PATT BLUE ttif,

165 Cornell St.o Unit 114

Kingston, New York l240l

February 28,2017

Suzanne Cahill, Planning Director

& The Planning Board,
City of Kingston City HaIl,420 Broadway
Kingston, NY 12401

Dear Ms. Cahill and Members of the Kingston

Planning Board:

Place Senior & Supportive Housing

I am writing this letter in support of Landmark as proposed by
RUPCO for the Kingston Alms House property at 300 Flatbush Avenue.

I believe that this project addresses the need for affordable housing for the elder, frail, disabled and those
in need of supportive housing.

As a resident at the Lace Mill in Kingston, an affordable housing complex for arlists, I am aware and
privileged to live in a RUPCO property. RUPCO is an outstanding properry developer and manager of
aJfordable housing. They are personally involved and caring, responsive to well being of the property as
well as the residents who live here.

Iam very impressed with their plans to develop the Landmark site and address the housing needs of our
more vulnerable community. RUPCO is top notch in all respects, highly aware and responsive to the
specific communities they serve and the specific needs each presents.

I applaud the integrity and thoughful planning and community inclusion of Kevin O'Connor to move
the Landmark project forward. I hope that the members of the Planning Board agree that RUPCO
succeeds in every way with the properties they have developed and will do the same with Landmark.

I hope you will see the value of repurposing Landmark Place by the very capable and outstanding
planning of RUPCO, and give the project your stamp of approval.

Thank you for all consideration.

Sincerely,

Patt 8/te

Patt Blue
Photographer, Educator and Writer
 8*
"o
I
TO: Susan Cahill,
Planning Director.
Kingston Planning Department
'1
313 {
1

,l
420 Broadway,
Kingston, NY 12401
RE: The Plans regarding the CityAlms House
My dear lvfs. Cahill

I could not make the few publc meetings regarding the future of the Alms House bv RUPCO and the Kingston
Planning Department but mulywanted to, because I feel that the City and RUPCO have not consdered other
alternatives that could prove to be a better solution for the re,purposing of this building than to allow this '?oor
Flouse" to become a... '?oor [Iouse"! I wish you would consider my suggestion, and I will gladly give you and
RUPCO a more detailed account regarding the better use for this historic structure than to make it a place for
limited income families. Doesn't this City have enough welfare and low,cost housing that continues to make it a
low,revenue producer and one of the poorest cities in the Hudson Valley? Can't wer s a growing center for
tourism, think bigger and more majestic thoughts than this? A city growing richly in popularity, historic
significance, and strong commerce through tourism, rather than a city of recipients that may be on the verge of
bankruptcy?

The "Alms Housett can become the prime example for this catalyst of resurrection and renewal, in my vision.
Are you familiar with'?reservation Magazine"? If so, just look on the few last pages showing advertisements {or
Historic Hotels. There are many of them from all over the world. Luxurious accommodations and historic
presewation are brought together to create a mecca for tourism! I see our beloved Alms House dressing those
pages with its own ad someday! Why not? Think big and majestic, not shortsighted and narrow,minded!

To llustrate my point, the developer of LJptown Kingston's Old Bank Building has the right idea but it is a
faulty vision because it is in the wrong place. With a limited amount of space and few offerings to draw in the
expected guests, I feel that, in its present proposal, it is doomed to fail. The answer, however, would be to turn
this completely around. Allow the Private contractor to develop the Alms House while allowing the Bank
Building to become the new project for RIIPCO, perhaps as low,cost or assisted living apartments that arc
convenient to markets and other stores.

I ask you to consider my suggestion {or an alternative and more rewarding solution to benefit our oncereat city.
We have lost so much of our heritage with poor thinking, rampant destruction of many historic sites, plus poor
planning without considering better alternatives. The first Mayor Gallo was one of the very few mayors who had
a vision for the city that was beneficial to all and who got to carry some of it through. We need that again here
and now with your help, We need to stop the slaughter and waste of our city without the foresight to find the
right solution. Our city could be a shining example of using the very best answers {or the future by relying on,
and restoring much of its past. We have it all right here if we are aware enough to see it and utilize it! I humbly
ask you if we can talk more about my proposal before it becomes etched in stone without full consideration of all
better ideas. With your agreement to consider my suggestion and with consideration from RUPCO, Kingston
eould become a Wort&Class Tourism Destiny, rising out of its stigma of low revenue' high taxes, and near,
bankruptcy into a new age of opulence.

SincerelyYours,

Bryan Allyn Blas

54 Linderman Avenue
Kingston, NY 12401-5350
creativeartrrerson@smail.com (845) 33 1, 1 467, c. (845\ 90L.47 58
Cahill, Suzanne

From: Abigail Robin <robina@hawkmail.newpaltz.edu>

Sent: Friday, March 03,2017 11:46 AM
To: Cahill, Suzanne
Subject: RUPCO's housing proposal

Dear Suzanne, I'm sorry that I was not able to attend meeting. Let me say
that I offer my support and approval to RUPCO. They have served the
community mightly and hope they continue their god work. Cordially,
Abigail

x Virus-free. www com

1
 c\
\-
{Lt-' ,tY 1\\'\
Susan Spencer Crowe
6 Ponckhockie Street
Kingston, New York 7240'l'

February 24,2017

Suzanne Cahill, Planning Director

and the Planning Board
City of Kingston
City Hall
420 Broadway
Kingston, NY 12401

Dear Ms. Cahill and Members of the Kingston Planning Board,

I am writing this letter in support of Landmark Place Senior & Supportive Housing as
proposed Uy nUeCO for the Kingston Alms House property at 300 Flatbush Avenue. I
believe th"i thir project addresses the need for affordable housing for the elderly, frail,
disabled and those in need of supportive housing. I attended the open house that RUPCO
held on February 18 and was very impressed with their plans to develop the site and
address the housing needs of our community. The robust array of onsite staffing and
services that RUPCO is proposing for this property will help ensure its success.

As an early supporter of the Lace Mill Factory rehabilitation and conversion into affordable
housing fr artists, I have been very impressive the thoughtfulness and care that goes into
every nUpCO project that it has been proposed since. The proposed site plan and design of
the Landmark Place Campus with its gardens and landscaping is of very high quality and
respectful of its neighbors. This campus will only add value to the surrounding area's
housing stock and to the quality of life in that neighborhood. It also saves and repurposes
an imprtant historical landmark property in the City of Kingston and puts the property on
the tax rolls for the first time in the building's history. RUPCO has a proven track record for
maintaining its properties and payment of taxes on those properties. This project is a win-
win for the City of Kingston.

I hope that the members of the Planning Board agree with my assessment and allow this
profect to move forward with their stamp of approval. Thank you for your time and
consideration.

Sincerely,
(.r,n brL-
oa-n !p"^ uA
Susan Spencer Crowe
 *
Cahill, Suzanne

From: Adam T. Mandell, Esq. <Mandell@maynardoconnorlaw.com>

Sent: Wednesday, March 01,2017 2:58 PM
To: Cahill, Suzanne
Subject: ISPAM? FORWARD TO lT@KINGSTON-NY.GOVI RUPCO Proposalfor Landmark place

lmportance: Low

-Personal & Confidental-

Dear Director Cahill,

Please allow this e-mail to serve as a written submission to the hearing for Landmark Place. ln the nterests of full
disclosure, please be advised that I am currently a member of the Board of Directors of RUpCO. !

I amwriting in favor of RUPCO's proposal for Landmark Place, largely for the reasons set forth during the hearing on
February 28,20L7.ln the interests of brevity, I will not repeat those reasons here.

However, after attendng the hearing on February 28,20L7,1 feel compelled to voice my concern for one argument, in
particular, raised in opposition. I find it incredibly offensive that some of the opponents of this project would
characterize the potential residents of Landmark Place as aggressive criminals, waiting to attack our children and
seniors. Those characterizations are without any valid basis, and reflect those speakers ignorance of the people of our
community who need stable, supportive and dignified homes. I hope that the members of the Planning Board will reject
this fearmongering as the transparent scare tactic that it is.

To counter that scare tactic, l'd like to share with you a portrait of who I see as potential residents of Landmark place, by
way of the example of my own family's story (my parents do not live locally, and will not be applying to live in Landmark
Place - I use them only to demonstrate the population that Landmark Place hopes to serve).

My parents are both college educated, tax paying citizens, with no criminal histories. My father was a successful banking
executive and my mother was a special needs teacher. ln 2006, my father decided to start a leasing/financing business
with a couple of partners, in which he invested almost all of the personal wealth he had amassed over his professional
career. ln late 2007, early 2008, when the economy collapsed, he lost everything. For the next several years, he worked
when he could, but depleted the remaining savings he had left, attempting to pay-down creditors, their mortgage and
other bills. Ultimately, they ended up losing their home to foreclosure and filing for bankruptcy.

Their financial troubles took a toll on their relationship, and after 44 years of marriage, my parents then got divorced,

My father lives in an apartment that he can't afford. He is diagnosed as clinically depressed and requires medication and
treatment. At times, he is forced to decide between paying rent or paying copays for treatment and medications. He has
been actively looking for a more affordable living situation for the past year, with no success.

Around the time of my parents' divorce, my mom was diagnosed with colon cancer that had metastaszed to her lung.
She had the lung tumor surgically removed this past December, and is currently in the middle of six-months of chemo
therapy. She would like to work, but can't, because the chemo has made her too weak, and because her compromised
immune system makes it too dangerous for her to be around the children. Her paid leave runs out in April, when she
will no longer be able to afford the apartment she is currently living in.

1
Obviously, neither of my parents will be living in Landmark Place. However, they are both appropriate examples of good
people, who despite their best efforts, still need assstance by way of affordable, stable housing. Most of us are just a
financial crisis, or a divorce, or a serious illness away from needing this help.

To vilify and dehumanize the people whom Landmark Place could potentially help, in an attempt to incite opposition to
this project, is disgraceful.

Respectful ly submitted,

Adam T. Mandell, Esq.

Partner
MAYNARD, O'CONNOR, SMITH & CATALINOTTO, LLP
PO Box 180 . Saugerties, NY .12477
Tel: 845-246-3666
Fax: 845-246-0390
Email: Mandell@mavnardoconnorlaw.com
Web: www.mayardoconnorlaw.com

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail transmission, and any documents, files, or previous e-mail messages attached
to it, may contain confidential information that is legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, or a person
responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or
use of any of the information contained in or attached to this message is STRICTLY-PROHIBITEO. f yo have received
this transmission in error, please immediately notify us by reply e-mail at Mandell@maynardoconnorlw.com or by
telephone at (518) 465-3553, and destroy the original transmission and its attachments wittrout reaOing them or sving
them to disc. Thank you.

2
 fuwv<'L ul,l't

February 27,2017

Kingston Planning DePartment Kingston Common Council

420 Broadway 420 Broadway
Kingston, NY 12401 Kingston, NY 12401

Re: Landmark Place letter of Support

Dear Planning Department and Common Council Members:
I am writing to you in support of RUPCO's Landmark Place proposalfor permanent,
affordable, accessible senior and supportive housing at 300 Flatbush Avenue, Kingston,
NY. Please enter this letter into the formal record for the public hearing on February 28,
2017.
I believe this project will benefit our city and its senior, homeless and special needs
residents by providing permanent, stable, affordable housing to those most vulnerable
in our community.

As a professional program developer and grant writer for a disabilities advocacy

agency, I see a large number of people who receive disability payments as their sole
income. Those who receive SSI only are priced out of every housing market in the
nation. We see people in need of affordable housing every day, but when they also
require accessible housing, the availability becomes more limited and the search more
daunting.
As the parent of an adult with developmental disabilities, it's important for our family's
peace of mind that he live in a safe, affordable environment. When he is, coupled with
the supports and services necessary to stabilize him in his home, everyone wins.
people can begin to enjoy their lives and pursue their dreams. Communities are
strengthened and more secure.
Landmark Place is an important step in taking care of our most at-risk citizens. I urge
you to vote in favor of RUPCO's proposal'

Very tru yours,

Tracy Stelli
165 Cornell Street, #214

Kingston, NY 12401
(9 1 4) 475-3360 ; TracyStell i n gwerf@g mai l. com
 WLhNi" , I' l'.,
Brady, Donna

From: Haber, Kyla

Sent: Wednesday, March 01,2017 10:58 AM
to: Chuck Polacco (chuckp@ netstep.net); Jamie Mills (jbahruth 1 @hotmail.com); Jonathan
Korn (kingstonre@gmail.com); Platte, Wayne; Rob Jacobsen
(robert@robertrjacobsen.com); William Tubby; Wiltshire, MaryJo
Cc: Cahill, Suzanne; Brady, Donna
Subject: FW: Response to Public Hearing on 2/28/17, regarding "The Alms House"

Hello AII
We received this email letter this morning.
Kyla

From : Jennifer Altoma re [mailto ja ltoma re24@ao l.com]

Sent: Wednesday, March OL,2Ot7 10:22 AM
To: Haber, Kyla <khaber@kingston-ny.gov>
Subject: Response to Public Hearing on2/28/L7, regarding "The Alms House"

To Whom It May Concern,

My name is Jennifer Altomare and I am a resident of 157 Tammany St. Kingston. I have been a resident of the
City of Kingston for almost 1 years now since purchasing my house in 2001, my husband has been a resident
of the City of Kingston since 1973 when his family immigrated here from ltaly. We are opposed to the
proposed Alm House project becoming Landmark Place. I am in agreeance with all of those who spoke
opposing the project at last nights public hearing.

When we purchased our home my husband and I were each commuting to Dutchess and Rockland County for
work and this was a perfect location to stay in Kingston and continue commuting. This Alms House location is
a perfect spot to build something that will boost the economy and add jobs to our area and/or bring middle
income families or individuals to our area. I don't see this project boosting the economy on any way. I'm very
concemed for the future of my children if they want to stay in Kingston when they get older, decent paying jobs
are hard to come by in this area now and I don't see it getting any better.

As for my neighbors and I, many who also have children, we are very concerned for the safety of our
neighborhoods, due to the mental health and substance abuse issues that will go along with the homeless
population that will be housed at Landmark Place. There are many children in our neighborhood and most of us
don't feel comfortable with this proposal.

Thank you,
Jennifer Altomare

Sent from AOL Mobile Mail

I
 !urwt
tlarht fu
My name is Paul Casciaro and I reside at 387 Clifton Avenue with my wife Kristine and two children.
Unfortunately I am out of town and unable to speak at this meeting so I have asked my Alderman to
read this letter on my behalf.

My family has lived in this neighborhood since the 1930's. We have taken pride in our neighborhood
even through its continual change. When we were children we spent many hours playing with our
Friends in this neighborhood. Whether it was basketball at the Colonial Gardens court or baseball in the
open field of what we called the lnfirmary on Flatbush Avenue or football in the Rundle's side yard
behind Mickeys lgloo as well as helping George and Mickey with their farm feeding the animals or
harvesting their corn.

To Move forward in time, we saw the development of Stuyvesant Charter, the construction of Koenig
Boulevard and the pavement take over the field at the lnfirmary we once used as playing fields. Koenig
Boulevard put an end to George and Mickey's farm and our football field. The expansion of Colonial
Gardens has now even made the basketball court a distant memory.
Jump to the start of 2000 and we saw the addition of yet another affordable housing project called
Birchwood. Birchwood was touted as a home for young Fireman, Police and a newly hired Teacher or
two who could not find affordable housing. Steve Fischer the head of the Kingston Housing Authority at
that time vehemently opposed the construction of Birchwood stating that we would be "creating what is
called a pocket of poverty " by concentrating affordable housing in one area. I am curious as to what
those young Police Officers, Fire Fighters or Teachers think about their development?
Now here we are in 2Ot7 preparing to debate yet another development poised to further infringe on
this neighborhood. Yes RUPCO will respond with studies on needs and how renovation of building
improve a neighborhood but there are also plenty of Studies like lnsights By Stanford Business 9/15/15
which will show how home values in distressed neighborhoods decline by an average of 2.5% within a
mile of similar concentrations . Or lhe 11,/3//1,1 Reuters Article describing pockets of poverty and their
negative impact to the current residents including Colonial Gardens, Stuyvesant Charter and Birchwood.
The long and short of ths is our neighborhood is currently at capacty with affordable housing. Smart
social economic development does not mean housing the poor and now potentially the homeless all in
one area. Our neighborhood is defined as "distressed" due to the amount of city resources expended to
police its safety as a result of cluster development. The city has two current low income and senior
housing projects forging ahead. Do we need and can we afford another one? ls this the best the City can
offer its current residents?
Respectful ly subm itted,
Paul G Casciaro
 Vtr) L 'L? t1
fwb\tc
Lawrence R. McCauley
132 Andrew St.
Kinqston. NY 12401

February 28,2017

To Whom it May Concern:

I write this as a homeowner and tax payer in the City of Kingston who is concerned about the
direction of our fine City. I do not believe the plan that RUPCO has for the Historic Alms House
is in the best interest of the City as a whole. We need development that will generate tax
dollars, and we need residents who will contribute financially to the area rather than those who
require assistance.

Respectfully,

Lawrence R. McGauley
 ltwru;- Olrll z i; lr+

Suzanne Cahill
Planning Director
City Hall
420 Broadway
Kingston, NY 12401

Dear Ms. Cahill,

I am writing you in regard to the property at 300 Flatbush Ave. (The Alms House) I believe this
property would be best suited as a commercially zoned property. lf the parcel is zoned
commercial, it would give opportunity to additional developers to bid on the property and
possibly offer more than what has been on the table so far. This is a prime piece of real estate,
situated between two main roads in Kingston. This would be perfect for commercial industry to
create both employment and revenue opportunities that Kingston so desperately needs. lf we
can get a developer in who has the vision to create a shopping and dining experience that will
benefit the whole community, not just one demographic, Kingston could benefit from a surplus
of revenue from a property that hasn't contributed as a revenue source previously. The City of
Kingston needs to look to at what kind of economic plan and structural integrity it will leave to
future generations. We need some kind of business that will stabilize the economic losses we
have endured over the past decades. Real Estate is on the upswing throughout Ulster County,
including the City of Kingston, if this property is zoned commercial and advertised nationally,
we could see a movement happen in the city that could start bringing business back into
Kingston, rather than drive it elsewhere.

I hope you take in to consideration my thoughts and views on this property and think of all
Kingstonians when making the decision on what zoning would best benefit this prime parcel of
land. We all can benefit from businesses that will create jobs, revenue and peace of mind for
the future of our city. Thank you for your time.

Best Regards,

tr
Cynthia Chambers
 'l t7
Cahill, Suzanne

From: Kmberly Healy <belkim50@gmail.com>

Sent: Tuesda March 07, 20'17 1 1:18 AM
lo: Cahill, Suzanne
Subject: Landmark place

To the councilman of the planning board.

I fist would like to thank you for listening to all of our concerns at the hearing on 2/28/L7 for landmark place.

My name is Kim Healy. I live at 39 Lisa Ln and I am opposed of RUPCO's LANDMARK PLACE at 300 FLATBUSH AVENUE.
My husband and I purchased our first home in 2016. Some of the selling points to us was that we would be living in a
safe neighborhood that we could start a family and know that our children would be safe while playing outside with the
other children in the neighborhood. When I read in the daily freeman that Rupco had a vision to turn the Alms house
into low income housing and the focus of the residents were special needs populations, chronically homeless, and those
diagnosed with mental illness or SUD (Substance Use Disorder) this did not sit well with me and I immediately had
regretted buying our home where we did.

I am a nurse and work with people who suffer with mental illness and substance abuse. I have seen firsthand what it is
like when my patients refuse to take their medications that help them with their battle of mental illness. They become
combative, sometimes abusive and irate with me or other staff. I have contacted RUPCO to see what their plan is for
when a resident(s) refuses to take their medications.
Prior to the hearing I had the pleasure of speaking with Tara Collins who is on the Rupco board and who also spoke at
the hearng .l asked her what Rupco plan was for when the residents with mental illness refuse to take their medication.
She informed that my statement was valid and that would get back to me. I never did hear back from Ms.
Collins until I met her at the hearing. During our conversation she advised me once again that my statement was valid
and stated to me "We never really thought about that" how is it that I am the only person who has thought of that
especially to the fact that Rupco has been around for so long. So basically there is nothing in place for when this
happens? As for the substance abuse residents I also asked Ms.
Collins what is the criteria for the resident who have battled substance abuse. How long do they have to be sober for in
order to live at Landmark place. I was told possibly 2 years but that was not set in stone. I then asked if these residents
will be drug tested monthly to make sure they are not using, again RUPCO had no answer for me. I find it unfair that I
have to worry about residents possibly loitering around my neighborhood while they are not on medications and acting
out, I have to worry about people wth past substance abuse who may have a relapse and rob my home to get money so
they get their fix.
I find that unfair to me, my community.and for the children in my neighborhood. We all work so hard for our homes and
to provide a safe area for our children to play and now that might be taken away from them because of RUpCO and
them not having any plan for these residents.

A lot of people made very valid points during the hearing such as if landmark place was to be built there would be an
increase in traffic and jay walkers which could increase the rate of people getting hit by cars and accidents in general.
Also the (PILOT) agreement that RUPCO has been given for other purchases they have made is not right. Why should
they be exempted to paying their fair share of taxes every year? Why should they be given a set amount of taxes to pay
every year for 32 years? lf another company were to buy the Alms house they would have to pay the taxes every year
on that property and I am pretty sure during the hearing I had heard f that was the case that company would have to
pay a million + in taxes a year - this would help the cty n a tremendous way,

1
 Thank you for your time and for reading my letter. ljust would like to end my letter with one last statement. please
think about all of us when you make your decision. Please think about our families and that all we are trying to do is
keep our neighborhood a safe place to raise a family. Please remember that the decision you make today will impact you
and the rest of the Kingston community forever. lf we allow this in our neighborhood and something does happen
whether t be an irate resident lashing out and hurting others, or a substance abuse user from the facility gets arrested
for assaulting one of their elderly neighbors and stealing from them so they can get there next quick fix, or a resident is
jaywalking and gets hit by a car just remember you were the ones who made the decision to approve this.

Thank you for your time.

Sincerely,

Kim Healy

2
March 2,2017

Plannlng Department
City Hall
420 Broadway
Kingston, NY 12401

Dear Planning DePartment:

being
I amnot a resident of Kingston but I worked for Ulster County at the Alms House building
for this purposes.
considered for residential housing and would like to comment on its suitability

persons who would not be expected to

lf the property were to be used for a nursing home or any other
at a major
leave the facility, this would be a good site. There is adequate parking and easy accessibility
intersection.

The site is, however, extremely dangerous to pedestrians. I will assume that
the formerly homeless
persons living there will not have cars. Walking along Flatbush Avenue, which I have
done many times,
treacherous with snow on
involves navigating a long curving road that has no sidewalks. lt is even more
from the commercial
the ground. Allong 9W, I cuffently see people walking with purchases having come
traffic only be expected
area in the Town of Ulster. There are no sidewatks along this road and foot
can

to increase with the addition of many more residents n the area'

At the Alms House intersection itself, crossing 9W involves 6 lanes of traffic

with cars coming over a rise
to get to the
while approaching the light. lt is folly to think that anyone would cross three intersections
with cars
convenience store right across the street and so residents will try to make a beeline
from all four directions. And, how do you recommend someone safely walking to Mickey's
approaching
lgloo?

and I would
Ithink ifs entirely appropriate that this site is not zoned for multiple residential units
with use of
strongly recommend that that the planning Board consider the pedestrian traffic associated
thls site for housing disabled, elderly and low-income people. They deserve to live
in a safe
environment.

Thank you for your consideration

Sincerely yours,

ARLENE FOY R
6 Union Center Road
Ulster Park, NY 12487
Cahill, Suzanne

From: Theresa Darling <ttdarlin9602@yahoo,com>

Sent: Monday, March 06,2017 11:14 AM
To: Cahill, Suzanne
Subject: Rupco - Alm's house

I am writing this letter in opposition to the proposed purchase of the Alms House by Rupco. I was at
the meeting on the 28th of February and listened to the proposed purchase for senior housing and
low income supportive housng. I sat and listened to those in favor of this proposal and what I found
was that the vast majority of those that were in favor of this project were either Rupco employees or
those on the board or those already benefitting from housing by Rupco. The rest of those in favor
lived in neighborng towns and even counties. I heard maybe one or two who actually lived in the city
of Kingston and had no affiliation with Rupco. Honestly, the only opinions that should be taken into
consideration by the planning board are from those who are actually residents of the City of Kingston
as we are the ones who have a vested interested in the growth and prosperity of OUR city.

One speaker made a great point by listing all of the low income properties that the City of Kingston
already has in place. lt was quite an impressive list and goes to show that we do know the
importance of caring for our less fortunate neighbors and we do just that. However, there comes a
time when we have to step back and access how many more of these types of housing we can afford
to do. I think we have met our quota and it's now time to look at neighboring towns and counties to
help in this effort.

The planning board needs to look towards the future growth of the City. I have owned my own home
in Kingston for close to 20 years and I have seen my taxes increase year and year. I am not sure
how much more they can go up before I need to consider looking elsewhere. t love Kingston and
certainly do not want it to come to that. We need to find ways to bring in good paying jobs and
businesses that will help take the burden off of us as homeowners. This project by Rupco won't even
remotely help our city. lf it is decided to go ahead with this project I fear it will have terrible
consequences. I am pleading with you to look for other investors for this project that will help the
homeowners and also help grow the city.

ln addition to the obvious issue of the tax burden, we have the issue of our sewer infrastructure. I
thinks it is fairly obvious the sewer system is in poor repair and in need of upgrading. Washington
Avenue made this extremely obvious. lf this project goes through it will possble create another
Washington Avenue and of course this will be at the expense of the tax payers.

My final concern is for the safety of my young children who live within 1110 of a mile from this
project. I love that they can go outside and play in the backyard safely. lf this project goes through,
that will no longer be the case. I can not live in an area where I have to worry on a daily basis of my
and my families safety. Yes, Rupco states there will be security on site but that certainly does
nothing for those of us living in the neighborhood. Honestly, the elderly living there are prime targets
for crime. I would NEVER put my elderly loved one in this housing unit. I work in the health care
feld and have for over 30 years and I know no matter how hard we try and help those with substance
abuse or those with serious mental illness, we can't always make it better for them and unfortunately,
a large majorty of this population resort to sometimes very serious crimes. I can not feel the same
comfort I do now living in my home if this project goes forward. lt makes me very sad to have to say
that.
1
As evidenced by this letter, I am not a writer by any means. I am just a very hard working middle
class City of Kingston resident who wants my hard work to make a difference. I am tired of being
taxed over and over. When is the middle class, the backbone of Kingston, going to be heard!! We
need positive changes in this City that makes us #1 in New York! A place that those with prosperous
businesses want to come to .... a place where more hard working people want to buy
houses. Someone said at that meeting "if you build it they will come" and that is so true. lf we keep
building low income housing, that is what Kingston will become. The more low income housing we
build, the more they will flock to our City and the end result will be disastrous.

Please let's keep the growth of Kngston going. Please say no to this project. Please understand that
ONLY those who actually live in the City of Kingston should have a voice in what is done with the
Alms or what is best for our City!!

Thank you for your time...

Sincerely,

Theresa A. Darling
28 Kingston Terrace
Kingston, NY

2
 'R".i d 3"'t1 @ Ytt
*ir-
Cahill, Suzanne

From: Beth Jacowitz bethjacowitz@hotmail.com

< >
Sent: Sunday, March 05,2017 3:11 PM
to: Cahill, Suzanne
Subject: Fwd: Oppose RUPCO

Sent from my iPhone

Begin forwarded message:

> My Name is Dr. Beth Sandy I grew up in Kingston , I went away for school and decided after starting a family my
husband and I came back to the place I grew up ..ln the 40 yrs I have seen a lot of changes to my hometown. Kingston
has flourished since the 80s however there have been changes in my town that have not been positive. Our community
helps out people in need with 13 facilities to aid with homeless mentally impaired,women in abusive relationship etc...
> Our town does not need an other place to increase the population of low income and mentally impaired. We need to
focus on the population here and not have places like NYC to bring more of this population.
> I am concerned about the safety of my family and neighborhood We live
> on quiet dead end road where the children play outside our house and never feel any fear that something will happen
to them.
> This new population of mentally ill roaming around our community will
> bring an anxiety of fear that I did not want when I move to my neighborhood. I move out a urban setting to avoid this
fear Also the sewage problem which no one in RUPCO wants to address will be deferred to the homeowners . Which is
unfair and very expensive.
> I opposed RUPCO to come to my home and community Thank you Dr. Beth
> Sandy

> Sent from my iPhone

1
 RBSOURCE CENTER FOR ACCESSIBLE LIVING, INL.
Your Independence is Our Mission

727 Ulsler Avenue TTY (845) 331-4527

Kingston, NY 12401 FAX (845) 331-2076
Main (845)331-0541

February 28,2017

Kingston Planning DePartment Kingston Common Council

420 Broadway 420 Broadway
Kingston, NY 12401 Kingston, NY 12401

Re: Landmark Place Letter of Support

Dear Members of the Planning Department and Common Council

My name is Susan Hoger. I am the Chief Executive Officer at the Resource Center
foi Accessible Living, lnc. or RCAL. My not for profit's mission is to serve people with
disabilities.

I am writing to you in support of RUPCO's Landmark Place proposal for permanent,

affordable senior and supportive housing at 300 Flatbush Avenue, Kingston. Please
enter this letter into the formal record for the public hearing on February 28,2017 '

I believe this project will benefit Kingston and its senior, homeless and special needs
residents a multitude of ways. As our baby boomer population continues to grow, we
correspondingly need more senior housing. As you are probably aware more
affordable housing is mixed use by providing housing to pre-identified sub-groups.
Whether these people are veterans or people with disabilities, they are as a group
also extremely in need of affordable housing.

RCAL as a service provider has consistent experience with people who are
homeless, in need of supportive housing or are frail seniors. Some seniors, for the
first time in their lives, may need accessible affordable housing. These seniors have
often been an integral tax paying part of our community fabric until some life
circumstance changes this. Seniors, veterans and people with disabilities should all
be welcome to stay in their community by being provided an adequate amount of
affordable housing. This proposal is an important project to meet those needs.

Member Agency, United Ilay of Ulster County

As RUPCO so aptly puts it, a place to call home provides stability, peace of mind,
safety, and security. Home is a place to hang your hat. Every home should be an
affordable home, a place even those on modest or fixed incomes can afford.

RCAL believes Landmark Place is an important next step for this City in order for us
to take care of our most at-risk citizens. I encourage you to vote in favor of the
Landmark Place proposal.

Sincerely,

Susan J. Hoger, LMSW

Chief Executive Officer

SJH/car

Member Agency, United Way of Ulster County

Lnfrn RK
Frncr
Senimr &
Supptrntve {-{*usln

Letters of Support
Tracy Stellingwerf, Kingston resident

Patt Blue, Kingston resident

Mona Sherry, RUPCO resident senior-supportive housing

Susan Spencer Crowe, Kingston resident

Friends of Historic Kingston

Pat Courtney Strong, Kingston resident & business owner

Susan Hoger, RCAL, Kingston supportive services.business

Rebecca Sauer, Supportive Housing Network of New York

February 27,2017

Kingston Planning Department

Kingston Common Council
420 Broadway
Kingston, NY 12401

Re: Landmark Place letter of Support

Dear Planning Department and Common Council Members:

I am writing to you in support of RUPCO's Landmark Place proposalfor permanent,

affordable, accessible senior and supportive housing at 300 Flatbush Avenue, Kingston,
NY. Please enter this letter into the formal record for the public hearing on February 28,
2017.

I believe this project will benefit our city and its senior, homeless and special needs
residents by providing permanent, stable, affordable housing to those most vulnerable
in our community.

As a professional program developer and grant writer for a disabilities advocacy

agency, I see a large number of people who receive disability payments as their sole
income. Those who receive SSI only are priced out of every housing market in the
nation. We see people in need of affordable housing every day, but when they also
require accessible housing, the availability becomes more limited and the search more
daunting.

As the parent of an adult with developmental disabilities, it's important for our family's
peace of mind that he live in a safe, affordable environment. When he is, coupled with
the supports and services necessary to stabilize him in his home, everyone wins.
People can begin to enjoy their lives and pursue their dreams. Communities are
strengthened and more secure.

Landmark Place is an important step in taking care of our most at-risk citizens. I urge
you to vote in favor of RUPCO's proposal.

Very truly yours,

Tracy Stellingwerf
165 Cornell Street, #214
Kingston, NY 12401
(91 4) 475-3360 ; TracvSteII nqwerf@q mai Lcom
i
 PATT BLT'E
165 CorneLl St., Unit LLA
Kingston, New York L24OL

February 28, 201,1

Kingston Common Council

City of Kingston City Hall' 420 Broadway
Kingston, NY 12401
420 Broadway, Kingston
NY 12401

Dear Ms. Cahitt and Members of the Kingston

Planning Board:
I am wrting this letter in support of Landmark Place Senior &
Supportive Housing as proposed by RUPCO for the Kingston Al-ms House
property at 300 Flatbush Avenue.
I believe that this project addresses the need for affordable housing
for
the eJ-derly, frail-, disabled and those in need of supportive housing.
As a resident at the Lace Milt in Kingston, an affordable housing
complex for artists, I am aware and priviteged to l-ive in a RUPCO
property. RUPCO is an outstanding property developer and manager of
affordable housing. They are personatly involved and caring,
responsive to well- beng of the property as wel-l as the residents who
Iive here.
I am vry impressed with their plans to devefop the Landmark site and
address the housing needs of our more vulnerable community. RUPCO is
top notch in al-l respects, hi-ghly ariare and responsive to the specific
communities they serve and the specific needs each presents.
I applaud the integrity and thoughtful planning and community
inclusion of Kevn O'Connor to move the Landmark project forward. I
hope that the members of the Planning Board agree that RUPCO succeeds
in every way with the properties they have developed and will do the
same with l,andmark.

I hope you will see the value of repurposing Landmark Place by the
very capabl-e and outstanding plannng of RUPCO' and give the project
your stamp of approval.
Thank you for al-l consideration.
Sincerely,
Patt B].ue

Patt Blue
Photographer, Educator and Writer
Kingston Pla nning Department
420 Broadway
Kingston, NY 12401

Re: Landmark Place Letter of Support

Iwish I could be there tonight to show you the face of a real person. lnstead, because of a death in the
family I must just send you my heart and soul and hope you hear this.

My name is Mona Sherry. I was a RE Broker in Ulster County and sold multi millions of dollars of Real
estate at Westwood Metes & Bounds. My real estate career was legendary. I was the top of 2 brokers in
the county every year for 35 yrs. I loved the business and it loved me back. I sold most of my properties
in the 700-1.5m range. Mostly between Woodstock and New Paltz. I raised 4 children, all of whom went
to Coleman and local schools. They allwent on to get Masters Degrees from RISD to Yale to Hobart
William Smith and Marist. I did it on my own. I had no choice.

ln 2003, I got a rare cancer. lt was Chondrosarcoma. lt was devastating and it took up 2/3 of my femur. I

had a tumor growing for 30 yrs. my local doc, never did a plain X-ray. He did other things - from vein
stripping to ultra sounds when I complained of the pain.

So who cares? Why care about a successful person who gets cancer-'we all know someone anyway' I
continued living and working after a six month hiatus because I had no choice. Credit cards were still
due, kids needed nikes, and school tuition, riding lessons... my home in Bishops Gate had a 12,0005 tax
bill. I kept going. Somehow. I used a cane, walking properties until I could barely stand up. I started to
fall behind. However, I kept selling. I kept going.

Then 2008. The market crashed. My last kid was out of the house and so was L lsold it luckily, but lost
all my equity. Just like many of you. ln 2OO8 I was done. My NY WKENDERS WERE BARELY functioning'
They could not keep up their two homes. No one wanted to buy a 2nd home. My market was gone.

I moved to Central NY near my son, who is an educator and professor. I was scared, and on disability' I

saved zero because every dime went to raising a family of 4 kids as a single parent, in a home where
education was prime.

I was60. I was terrified. I lived on 8755 a month in CNY. I had previously earned 100-150k a yr. my
income was written off; hence my Social Securit was horrific. My ex was a loser. He paid zero. Period'

I am you. I am not an aberration. I kept on going. I made a new company, baking Upstate Granola' lt is
thriving but I had to give it to my daughter, as I was falling in the oven, yet I persisted. I believe in hard
work.

Back to I am you. We are each one-step away from hard times. We are in G-D's hands, or the hands of
Karma or fate - but we all can be alone, sick and desperately needy.
 Susan Spencer Crowe
6 Ponckhockie Street
Kingston, New York L2401'

February 24,20L7

Suzanne Cahill, Planning Director

and the Planning Board
City of Kingston
City Hall
420 Broadway
Kingston, NY L2401

Dear Ms. Cahill and Members of the Kingston Planning Board,

I am writing this letter in support of Landmark Place Senior & Supportive Housing as
proposed by RUPCO for the Kingston Alms House property at 300 Flatbush Avenue. I
believe that this project addresses the need for affordable housing for the elderly, frail,
disabled and those in need of supportive housing. I attended the open house that RUPCO
held on February L8th and was very impressed with their plans to develop the site and
address the housing needs of our community. The robust array of onsite staffing and
services that RUPCO is proposing for this property will help ensure its success.

As an early supporter of the Lace Mill Factory rehabilitation and conversion into affordable
housing for artists, I have been very impressive the thoughtfulness and care that goes into
every RUPCO project that it has been proposed since. The proposed site plan and design of
the Landmark Place Campus with its gardens and landscaping is of very high quality and
respectful of its neighbors. This campus will only add value to the surrounding area's
housing stock and to the quality of life in that neighborhood. It also saves and repurposes
an important historical landmark property in the City of Kingston and puts the property on
the tax rolls for the first time in the building's history. RUPCO has a proven track record for
maintaining its properties and payment of taxes on those properties. This project is a win-
win for the City of Kingston.

I hope that the members of the Planning Board agree with my assessment and allow this
project to move forward with their stamp of approval. Thank you for your time and
consideration.

Sincerely,

Susan Spencer Crowe

Remarks to RUPCO 2.27.I7 by Friends of Historic Kingston

For Alms House

Preservation of our historic buildings and economic development are equal

partners in shaping the future of our community. We applaud investment in
our local architecture and honored historical traditions.
We strongly believe that the Kingston Cty AIms House is an intrinsic part
of this tradition and can continue to serve the citizens of our community.
This noteworthy Gateway to Kingston merits our care, our preservation
and our protection. The Friends of Historic Kingston supports RUPCO plans
to preserve the Alms House through sustainable development while
continuing to recognize the historic symbolism of the site.
 COURTNEY
sTRoN9F
{*;#e

cb,27. 17

Toth* Ftrnr*ryloorrd:
pFoft to scnbr end rukrcrable
*UP Lfdrrt placc protect will provc crircl st
in Kirdt' I am
;rr". of orr trfirnunity, A hhffi orrpr rd ll{}nceryn aHcr?f rnd knr
lccny rmil drrt oureity lnctitttioni proYidc sri*l er$ce to rnery
p6cl affer hordg lht
tr*,ic psph. hrt' rrlry fu $ty of l(i'o*on ir lo:iut to
ffrcts thir necdr.

rcrthc nrxt 2 y.f', th nbr pophtbn in our srsrxlnitv

d lfrab flblt c
f *niors
nnixrd trrd, incrcairs e t 1 5 pcop" lilc ds rpt hrv cnorh hot't*
happcn uben &l bn,nr
intl. ron rr F'.!G;* n*tt** pbnni4fOr{rhatwilt
f'sdsnts lilr}: or bclqw a
rftddL inorne ror*rr rctire" Srtccn pcrcar* of Xirgrton 't pfofct
peoph' Thic
p(rft lerr{ ard rnohrra5 percrx rc l*incornc workir
|oo,o|r*r turc tht tg,G'G r:s6r*', rFG& ip accEunt' rd that
ir why I
"
spport iL
rr th: Alrs tloce
As -pYi3 dc{ilborr s,id| a telr k rcord' RUP will
akE pbc in rc citv- I ur3c
in r.rh a riy ttst frarfo t{t tht poaitfur dbFrnts
thr gry sf Kifl$on Phnnirq Bord to t foflbly on
*uPs plb'tn'

Slrcrch,

?r-f;. *- si"-
t otrttV Stnr
416rodnf
l(lngtr, !*Y
 RSOUR.CE CNTER FOTT,4CCESSTtsLE LIVING, iNC
Yerur Jncfep etzdence is ur Mlsslon

727 Ulster Avenue TTY (845) 331-4527

Kingston, NY 12401 rAX (845) 331-20?6
Main {845)331-541

ebruary 28,2A17

Kingston Planning Department Kingston tommon Council

420 Broadway 420 Broadway
Kingston, NY 1?401 Kingston, NY 12401

Re: Landmark Place Letter of Support

Dear Members of the Planning Department and Common Cotncil:

fvly name is Susan Hoger. I am the Chief xecutive Officer at the Resource Center
for Accessible Living, lnc. or RAL My not for profit's mission is to serve people with
disabilities,

I am writing to you in support of RUPGO's Landmark Place prcposalfor perrnanent,

affordable senior and supportive housing at 300 Flatbush Avenue, Kingston. Please
enter this letter into the formal record for the public hearing on February 28, 2917.

I believe this project wlll benefit Kingston and its senior, homeless and special needs
residents a multitude of ways. As our baby boomer populaticn contlnues to grow, we
correspondingly need more senior housing. As you are probably aware rnre
affordable housing is mixed use by providing housing to pre-identified sub-groups.
Whether these people are veterans or people with disabilities, they are as a group
also extremely in need of affordable housing.

RCAL as a service provider has cansislent experience with people who are
homelees, in need of suppcrtive housing or are frail seniors. Some seniors, for tl^le
first time in their lives, may need accessihle affordable housing. Tl'ese seniors have
often been an integral tax paying prt of our community fabric untilsome life
circumstance changes this. $eniors, veterans and people with disabilities should all
be welccrne to stay in their community by being provided an adequate amount of
affordable housing. This pl'oposal is an important project to rneet thse needs.

bmber .4gent,, {.inited l/q ts{ L;lst(r {'ount\r

SHNNY Salutes RUPCO's Supportive Housing Efforts I RUPCO Page 1 of3

Serltlrglfuw
(iM'6
adtw ****ls {-*nl*ct S*bscribe {JseluI orm: Spc*seirs
I lc lnkE

I '
;",;, * ;;,;-;
;; ;;; ; ;,',;;"i,' ;;;;;;i i;;;;;
;'::
Landmark Plscr press nference held "pn lebruary 13, t1T'

13
Feb. Along with hhe Campaign 4 NY/NY Housing, lhe Supportiv*
Housing Nelwurk of New York has been working for three
years ta ensur lhal there ere sufficienl resures tc hause
1t7
the mosl vulnerable New Yorkers, at a time when more lha*
8,000 are hcmeless slatewide. We have apptauded Covern*r
Cuomo's commilment to develcp ?t,00 unils of supporlive
hcusing over Lhe :rext 15 years and were pleased when his budget lasl year inttud*d
resource$ lo develap the firsl 6,St0 over five years lhrouEh lhe Empire Slale Supparhive
l-lousing l:rilialive {FSSHI)" However, lhe requiremenl lhaL lhe apprcpriation be subjecl to a
Memorandum of Understanding belwee* him, Lhe speaker of bhe Assembly, and Lhe leader ot
Lhe SenaLe, led Lo *nsuccessful negoliations. The full pot of money has nct yet been released'
Nevertheles:, as a resutl of the tireless *dvocacy *f our partners and membe:-s we we:"e abte
lo secue funding in [*e amount of $150 million in lasl ye*r's budget cycle la fund the First
1,0 units of supporlive ho*sinq.

RUFCCI's Lendmark Place will c*ntain 35 [55t-{l units, among the first in bhe slaLe to be part af
lhis monumenlal commilmcnt. The hisloric property wiil be rehabbed Lc house ssnisrs,
including lhose that are medically frail, velerans, lhe chronica[ hcmeles* and lhose wilh
menLa[ iltness and subslance abuse disorders. This developmenl will allcw lh*s* people the
opporLunity lo rebr"ild Lheir lives and regain shability. The Network saluLes RUPCC on
innovative *nd criticatly essenli*l work"

Meanwhile, back in Albany w* are prepared far anolher sesn of budg*l neEolialions' The
Eovefnor has included g2.5 bittion in his budget for a* affordabte housing
pl*n, includin $1
billio* for supporlive housing over Lhe nexL five years. While lhis budgel removes Lhe
requireme nL fcr lhe MtU, lhe proposaI is slill subject Lo negotialions in the leislalure. At*ng
with our prtnets, we re centinuing te push tor lhe release oF much-needed funds for
supportve ho*sing, be it lhrough the sgning of last year's MOU or through lhe *pproprialion
of unds in lhis year's budget. *raniuelio*s tike RUPCt, wilh the buildings lhey develop and
lefins Lhey serve, remind us of why these governmenl pblicies are sc imporlanl. We look
forward [o lhe s*ccessful ccnstruction and opening cf Landmark Place and Lhe sharsd lork
ahscd.

'1*s: Landmark Piece, supportive hausing

'l
Share this

http : //rupco. org/rebecca-sauer- sshny-esshi-rupco/ 2t2812017

 From the Desk of Ellen DiFalco -lr L
66 Glen Street
Kingston NY 1.240L
845 331 7 497 edifalco@earthlink.net

TO: Suzanne Cahill, Planning Director

Kyla Haber, Assistant Planner

Planning Board Members: Wayne D. Platte, Jr., Chairman; Charles

Polacco, Vice-Chairman, MaryJo Wiltshire, Robert Jacobsen and
Jonathan Korn

Planning Board Alternate Members:

Jamie Mills and William Tubby

DATE: March 8,2017

Thank you for the opportunity to offer my comments for the record to the
Planning Board regarding the RUPCO's proposal to create studios and apartments
in the Alms House building to be named "Landmark Place."

The Tuesday, February 28 Public Hearing was advertised as a "public hearing" and
should have been conducted as one. To delay the public hearing for a 3S-minute
presentation by RUPCO Director Kevin O'Connor and Engineer Dennis Larios was
an inconvenience to the attendees. An "informational meeting" is conducted for
such presentations.

As the Planning Board is currently reviewing the site plan, it should be noted,
Ulster County is served by one city, 20 towns, and three villages. Yet, RUPCO has
set its sights on another city of Kingston property for construction of what it
deems a "solution to meet the city's shortfall for affordable housing" (quote by
CEO Kevin O'Connor in March 8 Daily Freeman) for our senior citizens, homeless
and mentally ill population. lsn't it enough they are ready to break ground at
Cedar Street {E-Square) and have plans for The Metro mixed commercial use
property on South Prospect Street and Greenkill Avenue?

It is my opinion, the city of Kingston has enough "pockets of poverty" in and

around the immediate area and we are saturated with subsidized housing. While
this construction may fulfill a portion of the affordable housing gap, we will not
meet the needs of the hundreds of individuals and families that are on waiting
lists for Section 8 housing or supportive housing if this project is allowed to be
built. lt is also ludicrous to assume there will not be issues when you commingle
special needs individuals, veterans, frail and disabled alongside a senior housing
complex on the same campus.

Additionally, the Landmark Place campus will tax an already failing infrastructure.
It was humorous that during the power point presentation, the engineer noted
the water and sewer lines would now be rerouted across the street; however, the
lines run to the same system. RUPCO should have made adjustments in their
planning to have their own onsite utilities.

RUPCO needs this project to go through because they are relying on all the tax
credits they will be eligible for to cover their 30-35 percent rehabilitation costs.

I ask that you be mindful of the comments that were made from the residents
who actually live in the immediate vicinity of this project, who raised their
families and pay taxes. They are very concerned if this project moves forward and
so should you.

What your board should ask is when this project was in its early stages of being
sold, why wasn't the Planning Board engaged in the process? Why didn't anyone
from the city speak during public comment at the Ulster County Economic
Development Alliance board meetings? Were any of your board members even
invited to these meetings? Why, when the authorizing resolution was passed for
the disposition of 300 Flatbush Avenue, the county thought it was a great idea to
market the property to the highest bidder. RUPCO was not the highest bidder. We
have since learned there were two other bids that were tossed aside. You should
also know that most of the negotiations for the disposition of this property were
done behind closed doors in secret EXECUTIVE SESSIONS. Would the outcome
have been any different?

I also urge youto consider it a conflict of nterest when L2 RUPCO employees and
three associates (in health care fields) were allowed to comment during this
public hearing. This was an ambush and well-orchestrated. What else would a
RUPCO representative or one closely affliated with the organization say-it's not
a needed project and be fired for insubordination the very next day?

Finally, it is my opinion that RUPCO's Landmark Place project is not the best fit for
the former Alms House. When your board weighs n on the zoning change that is
required for RUPCO to proceed, it is my hope you will agree that Landmark Place
is NOT the "solution to meet the city's shortfall for affordable housing."

Thank you for your time and consideration.

Ellen DiFalco
 (n"'J
March 1,,20t7 sfnfrt

City of Kingston Planning Board

420 Broadway
Kingston, NY 12401

Attn: Sue Cahill

Dear Ms. Cahill,

This letter is in opposition to RUPCO's purchase of the Alms House for low
income senior and supportive housing. Our neighborhood is saturated with low
income housing already. Adding 66 units to our neighborhood would stress the
already existing sewer infrastructure. During the presentation last night, it was
noted that there would be an increase from L,600 gallons of water to 8,L00
gallons. lt was said that this is a slight increase in use, when in reality it is five
times the present use. Not a slight increase in our opinion. Our sewers are
already failing throughout the city and this type of increase would only lead to
another "Washington Avenue" disaster. The city and the taxpayers cannot afford
somethng like this.

On another note, Rupco and their supporters are in favor of this project to
get the people who are in need of this housing placed in permanent homes.
Rupco has cited that these people in need are presently living in "flop houses"
and motels/hotels. Our concern is that after Rupco builds this facility, and these
people are placed in permanent housing, these "flop houses" and motels/hotels
will only be refilled. lf these places are so atrocious, then landlords should be
held accountable and renovate said buildings or be forced to close them.

By adding so much low income housing, our city cannot grow on the 39% of
taxpayers that are paying for all the low income residents. Our tax rolls would not
be used to the best of its ability by accepting a PILOT payment from Rupco. The
39o/o of taxpayers cannot afford for our taxes to increase to help support this
facility. We realize that federal tax money already ear-marked for such projects
 Kingston is becoming a mecca for low income residents. The middle class
of Kingston do not have any housing available to them. Many of our recently
graduated children that reside our city are being forced to move out of the area
to pursue jobs and affordable housing. We need to look at potential buyers for
this property. There have been offers since Rupco's, and they should have an
opportunity to present their ideas for this most valuable piece of property,
especially if it means jobs and tax revenue for the city.

We hope that the Board will see through the amount of people who came
out in support of the project. Most of them were employees and members of the
of Rupco's board. Also most of them did not reside in the City of Kingston. There
was one woman who resides in Greene County and she said there are no facilities
like this in her area, maybe Rupco should build there.

ln closing let us say that we are not against this facility being "in our
backyard", but what we are saying is that we do NOT want ANY more low income
housing being built in our city. lf we continue to keep bringing low income
housing to our city, soon the percentage of paying taxpayers will not be able to
afford for this. We need to bring jobs and paying taxpayers to our city. The 39%
cannot continue to shoulder the burden.

Sincerely,

,Jrt* n ilr'*lr*1 Jl ,-"n f\ .*\ I {rf/e,n t/ou*

3)t C.L,:an flAut ?'l unt &
fua"nrsr.
(tnq6r"i Y, ,W, lrtff,tWot
r*-*a)o-.4ffi.- 8s t'5\ t^,t lY/<
2

2t Lt't\t
3 ,t il L*aJ'.. , Y
KinYh* NJU
ru/h", {- l&r',<*
3 q3, C/-,'C{a^ ,rr*
/a' *? Ju-^
l/lm t fo,,.a il"t"4
'vv/ Ct,"rno" ,{rq
l*
Kt aJ ttdn l
/L/ / I
l,"551-r- tl/
r7-v(
ruqc, Li rd,6 tlnn.nbcs
"
3-Uih A
l!*slo*r nlY rlt{o l

&*.a- Cody cl
/ -re/// s/
ftr7ttr,hy/Lllo /

p^/ /r/"ne ule

sL7 Al,'f/* u<
/<rn s "L Y'
,\/ /zvt/

Onn^ "/uo'
^r Ol'fto*,/u''
/<'n?ston,N/ /alrt

Hy.mu'*
k.*,^.o.i{t Y /L/ I
 ?kzucu bs
lefi1.t Afu < tf -?"" o l.

I ohzl U 0
34
*01 aQl vw n Lq Wffidd 4
.r\t

b
.ttJ -tntl 7c va
qrvl Lg
^:l F

SSffic-
 fi...-, vz-* 4aln c

March 6,20L7

City of Kingston Planning Board

420 Broadway
Kingston, NY 12401

Attn: Sue Cahill

Dear Ms. Cahill:

I am writing this letter in opposition to the proposed purchase of the Alms House by Rupco. I was at the
meeting on the 28th of February and listened to the proposed purchase for senior housing and low
income supportive housing. I sat and listened to those in favor of this proposal and what I found was
that the vast majority of those that were in favor of this project were either Rupco employees or those
on the board or those already benefitting from housing by Rupco. The rest of those in favor lived in
neighboring towns and even counties. I heard maybe one or two who actually lived in the city of
Kingston and had no affiliation with Rupco. Honestly, the only opinions that should be taken into
consideration by the planning board are from those who are actually residents of the City of Kingston as
we are the ones who have a vested interested in the growth and prosperity of OUR city.

One speaker made a great point by listing all of the low income properties that the City of Kingston
already has in place. lt was quite an impressive list and goes to show that we do know the importance
of caring for our less fortunate neighbors and we do just that. However, there comes a time when we
have to step back and access how many more of these types of housing we can afford to do. I think we
have met our quota and it's now time to look at neighboring towns and counties to help in this effort.

The planning board needs to look towards the future growth of the City. I have owned my own home in
Kingston for close to 20 years and I have seen my taxes increase year and year. I am not sure how much
more they can go up before I need to consider looking elsewhere. I love Kingston and certainly do not
want it to come to that. We need to find ways to bring in good paying jobs and businesses that will help
take the burden off of us as homeowners. This project by Rupco won't even remotely help our city. lf it
is decided to go ahead with this project I fear it will have terrible consequences. I am pleading with you
to look for other investors for this project that will help the homeowners and also help grow the city.

ln addition to the obvious issue of the tax burden, we have the issue of our sewer infrastructure. I think
it is fairly obvious the sewer system is in poor repair and in need of upgrading. Washington Avenue
made this extremely obvious. lf this project goes through it will possible create another Washington
Avenue and of course this will be at the expense of the tax payers.
My final concern is for the safety of my young children who live within t/LO of a mile from this project. I
love that they can go outside and play in the backyard safely. lf this project goes through, that will no
longer be the case. I cannot live in an area where I have to worry on a daily basis of me and my family's
safety. Yes, Rupco states there will be security on site but that certanly does nothing for those of us
living in the neighborhood. Honestly, the elderly living there are prime targets for crime. I would NEVER
put my elderly loved one in this housing unit. I work in the health care field and have for over 30 years
and I know no matter how hard we try and help those with substance abuse or those with serious
mental illness, we can't always make it better for them and unfortunately, a large majority of this
population resort to sometimes very serious crimes. I cannot feel the same comfort I do now living in
my home if this project goes forward. lt makes me very sad to have to say that.

As evidenced by this letter, I am not awriter by any means. I am just a very hard working middle class
City of Kingston resident who wants my hard work to make a difference. I am tired of being taxed over
andover. Whenisthemiddleclass,thebackboneof Kingston,goingtobeheard!! Weneedpositive
changes in ths City that makes us #L in New York! A place that those with prosperous businesses want
to come to .... A place where more hard working people want to buy houses. Someone said at that
meeting "if you build it they will come" and that is so true. lf we keep building low income housing, that
is what Kingston will become. The more low income housing we build, the more they will flock to our
City and the end result will be disastrous.

Please let's keep the growthof Kingston going. Please say no to this project. Please understand that
ONLY those who actually live in the City of Kingston should have a voice in what is done with the Alms or
what is best for our Cityl!

Thank you for your time

Sincerely,

Theresa Darling
28 Kingston Terrace
Kingston, NY 12401
(84s) 33L-21s0
 . <-
"lultt
March 3,20L7

Kingston Planning Board

Kingston City Hall

420 B'way

Kingston, NY 12401

Ref: Alms House

ln general this project is commendable, however, lfeel the City of Kingston is

already overburdened with similar projects. This project will not only tax our
resources such as water, sewage and EMS but it will be doing so at the expense of
the City taxpayer (due to the propose tax breaks).

These type of projects should be spread throughout the County so as not to

centralize their support burden in one area. This project could as easily be located
in Saugerties, Highland or New Paltz.

I am opposed to this project going forward within the City of Kingston especially
in light of the projected tax breaks!

Yours truly;

Larry Bigando

17 Crane St.

Kingston