Vous êtes sur la page 1sur 3

ARRIESGADO COLLEGE FOUNDATION,

INC.
College of Education
201 Bonifacio St., 8100 Tagum City, Davao del
Norte, Phillipines
Email: vincentarriesgado@yahoo.com.ph Tel. (084)217-3691,
(084)218-5328
_____________________________________________________________________________________

Name of the Pre-service teacher : ___________________________________________________


Subject Taught : ___________________________________________________
School : ___________________________________________________
Date : ___________________________________________________

100-95 94-89 88-83 82-78 77-72


Lesson Planning Excellent Very Satisfactorily Fair Unsatisfactorily
Satisfactoril
y
1.Objectives were stated in
behavioral terms
2.There was a congruence
between:
a. Objective and subject
matter
b. Objective and teaching
procedure
c. Objective and
formative test
d. Objective and
assignment
Teaching Methods
1. Methods used
was/were suited to the
needs and capabilities
of the students.
2. The teacher was
creative enough to
adapt his/her method
to the students
capabilities
3. Visual aids and other
examples were used to
illustrate the lesson
4. The teacher made
effective use of
formative test after
teaching
Classroom Management
1. The teacher has a
systematic way of
checking:
a. Attendance
b. assignment/homework
c. practice exercises
d. group works/project
e. passing in and out of
the room
f. correcting, distributing
and collecting paper
2. order and discipline
were present in the
classroom
3. Visual aids were within
easy reach of the
teacher during his/her
teaching
Communication Skills
1. The teacher spoke
clearly
2. The teacher used
correct grammar in
speaking.
3. Correct responses
were given by the
students through the
teachers skillful
questioning.
4. He/ She observed
correct pronunciation.
5. The board work of the
teacher was free from
errors in grammar and
in spelling.
6. The teachers
handwriting on the
board and lesson plan
was legible enough to
be read and
understood.
Teachers Personality
1. The teacher is neat
and well-groomed.
2. The teacher is free
from mannerism or
physical defects that
tend to disturb the
students attention.
3. The teachers
personality is strong
enough to command
respect and attention.

Strengths:
________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________
________________________________________

Comments and Suggestions:


________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________
________________________________________

Name of the Evaluator/Cooperating Teacher: _________________________


Signature over Printed Name

Date:_______________