Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
1. Traditional jurisdiction under Pennoyer? iii. Ps unilateral contact with forum state
a. Consent? created harm under Denckla or
i. Objection waived? Volkswagen? =INSUFFICIENT
ii. Appeared in court to defend on the b. Burger King reasonableness factors (if
merits? unreasonable, violates due process)?
iii. Forum selection clause (Carnival)? i. Burden on D?
b. Served while present? 1. Foreign D under Asahi?
i. Tag jurisdiction under Burnham (NOT ii. Interest of P?
majority concurrence says min. iii. States interest?
contacts test)? 1. Case between two foreign
c. Resident? parties under Asahi?
i. Individual = domicile, Corp. = INC / iv. Other states trumping interest?
PPB 3. Is this a specific or general jurisdiction claim?
ii. General jurisdiction? a. Did the claim arise out of the Ds contacts with
1. Essentially at home under the forum state?
Goodyear? Under Daimler: i. If yes, specific jurisdiction apply min.
domicile? (INC/Principal place contacts test.
of business) ii. If no, general jurisdiction.
d. Seizure of property in forum state? (Quasi in 1. D must be essentially at home
rem) in the forum state through
i. Shaffer min contacts still required continuous and systematic
2. International Shoe minimum contacts test? relations under Goodyear.
a. Intentionality and purposeful availment? 2. Corporation at home = INC /
i. Purposefully targeting forum state PPB under Daimler, but
under Burger King or McGee or person indicates these categories may
in forum state under Calder? = not be exclusive.
SUFFICIENT 4. If no, object/move to dismiss under 12(b)(2) for lack of
ii. Placing product into stream of PJ in first responsive pleading or WAIVED
commerce under American Radiator, a. Under Insurance Co. of Ireland, a court may
Goodyear, Asahi or J. McIntyre? = sanction PJ to an uncooperative party
MAYBE sufficient