Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Determinant Of Auditors
Turnover Intention From Public
Accounting Firm
Binti Shofiatul Zaki Baridwan Bambang
Jannah Faculty of Economic Hariadi
and Business
Faculty of Economic Faculty of Economic
University of Brawijaya,
and Business and Business
Indonesia
University of Brawijaya, University of Brawijaya,
Indonesia Indonesia
intention based on the Theory of Reasons Action not satisfied with their work have the intention to
(TRA). TRA explains that intention is the best quit the organization and hope to get another job.
predictor of actual behavior (Ajzen and Fishbein, Thus, the auditors who are satisfied with
1980: 40). Previous research investigating the job will be happy to do the job and not trying
turnover has been focused on turnover intention to find alternative employment. The auditors
because there is no actual data and turnover who joined public accounting firm are assumed
studies require longitudinal study design (Dalton, utility maximizers. Someone who is not satisfied
Hill, & Ramsay, 1997). Steel and Ovalle (1994) with his work, tends to leave the organization in
state that turnover intention is probably early stages of his career. Gregson (1990),
antecendent and predictor of turnover decision. Setiawan and Ghozali (2013), Fitriany, Gani,
To identify factors influencing the turnover Siregar, Marganingsih, & Anggraita (2011),
of public accountant, previous research has Muliawan et al. (2009), Lathifah (2008), Kalbers
investigated the relationship between job and Cenker (2007), Shafer, Park, & Liao (2002)
satisfaction, affective commitment, continuance found that the high job satisfaction causes lower
commitment, performance, role conflict, role turnover intention. Therefore, the rearch
ambiguity, and turnover intention. This study hypothesis is formulates as follow.
contributes to the literature by building on prior
models of public accounting turnover. This study H1: Job satisfaction has a negative influence on
ia a combination of Muliawan, Green, & Rob turnover intention
(2009), Law (2005) and Viator (2001) research
into one model to understand the antecendents of Organization Commitment
turnover intention. This model can provide an The concept of organization commitment is
answer or solution to the problems of turnover based on premise that individuals from an
phenomena in public accounting. attachment to the organization (Ketchand and
These contribution have both theoretical Strawser, 1998). In the development of
and practical implication. Theoritically, to organizational commitment in attitudinal
predict turnover intention, we can use affective perspectives, organizational commitment
commitment, continuance commitment, and role develops through various dimensions or multiple
conflict. From practical standpoint, public sources. At least, consisting of affective
accounting firm has to improve the working commitment and continuance commitment
atmosphere. Related to this, many auditors and (Meyer and Allen, 1984). Dunham, Grube, &
accounting graduates choose a career in public Castaneda (1994) stated that a multidimensional
accounting firm. approach to organizational commitment provided
This articel is divided into four sextions. a more accurate understanding between
Section one presents the research problem and individuals involvement and the organization.
objective. Section two extracts relevant literature Therefore, measurement of organizational
on turnover intention and hypothesis commitment in this study is measured by
development. Section three explains the research affective commitment and continuance
methodology, including sample and sample commitment.
selection. Section four report results and Affective commitment (desire based) is one
discussion. of the three components of the commitment
model proposed by Meyer and Allen (1991). It is
2. Literature Review and Hypotheses based on the side bet theory of Becker (1960).
Development Employees with a strong affective commitment
remain in the organization because they wanted
Job Satisfaction to. Auditor have emotional attachement to the
Discrepancy theory emphasizes on what is firms. The feelings can arise in the form of
expected by employees and what is gained by the loyalty, love, joy, pleasure, and others. Thus,
employees. The employees will be satisfied auditors will work with pleasure and maintain its
when the gap between expectation and membership. Rahayu (2011), Perryer, Jordan,
perception of reality does not exist. The decision Firns, & travaglione (2010), Hall and Smith
to leave the organization is a first step taken by (2009), pakawaru (2009), Kalbers and Cenker
individual because of dissatisfaction. Mobley (2007), Law (2005) found that affective
(1990), found that the employees who are commitment negatively affect to turnover
satisfied with their jobs will be happy to do the intention. Therefore, the research hypothesis is
job and they will not evaluate alternative formulated as follows.
amployment. However, the employees who are
H2: affective commitment has a negative
influence on turnover intention
H4: performance has a negative influence on H6: Role ambiguity has a positive influence on
turnover intention turnover intention
respondents in various places. The other testing are Average Variance Extraxted (AVE)
questionnaires was sending directly to and Communality, which should be above 0.5.
respondents and via internet (google docs and e- For outer loading by loading score of 0.5-0.7, the
mail). indicators do not to be removed along the AVE
and Communality score above 0.5 (Hartono,
Questionnaire 2009: 80). Information about the validity test
The participants received a cover letter results can be found in Appendix A. The
explaining the purpose of the study, an eight- reliability test uses Cronbachs alpha with rule of
page bundle including the front and back cover thumb over 0.7, but 0.6 is still acceptable (Hair et
survey questionnaire. The instrument is in al. 2006).
Indonesian version. The problems that may Measurement of job satisfaction was based
appear from using surveys in collecting the data on two studies. Three indicators developed by
are the low response rate and ambiguous Hoppock used by Muliawan et al. (2009). Seven
questionnaire statement. The questionnaire was indicators developed by Brayfield and Rothe
pre tested to ensure the appropriateness of the adapted by Kalbers and Cenker (2007). Based on
questions and to eliminate ambiguities. A pre test the validity test, two items were removed
was conducted by distributing 15 questionnaires because it has value less than 0.5. Two other
to auditor in Jakarta and Bali. Based on pre test, items were removed from the lowest value to
slight improvements were made to the increase AVE and Communality more than 0.5.
questionnaire. Cronbachs alpha value of job satisfaction is
The samples are chosen using a convenient 0.6677.
sampling technique because the information Affective commitment and continuance
about the number of auditors who work in public commitment were measured by widely used and
accounting in East Java is not available in the accepted scales developed by Meyer and Allen
directory IAPI (www.iapi.com). Based on the (1984), Affective Commitment Scale-ACS and
directory of Indonesian Institute of Certified Continuance Commitment Scale-CCS. Based on
Public Accountants (IAPI) 2015, there are 53 the validity test, two items were dropped from
public accounting firms in East Java. 45 of them ACS (factor loading below 0.5), and Cronbachs
are in Surabaya, and 8 public accounting in alpha was 0.7843. Furthermore, five continuance
Malang. From all the firms, 13 firms in Surabaya commitment items dropped from CCS (factor
and 6 public accounting firms in Malang are loading were less than 0.5) and Cronbachs alpha
willing to accept and fill out the questionnaire. was 1.0000.
Not all firms are willing to accept the Measurement performance was based on
questionnaires because of their busy work and scale items adoptes from Kalbers and Fogarty
organizational policy for not receiving any (1995). Validity test indicated that one items was
questionnaire. removed (factor loading was less than 0.5). The
The questionnaires were sent by mail using Cronbachs alpha was 0.7466.
EXPRESS POS services attached with postage This study used modified version of the 14
free return envelopes. After a week, a follow up items Rizzo et al. (1970) for role conflict and
reminder phone call was made to all participants. role ambiguity. Validity test indicated that all
Then, further follow up calls were made every items loaded satisfactory, except one items
week until the questionnaires had been filled. dropped from role ambiguity (factor loadings
The completed questionnaires were taken under 0.5). The Cronbachs alpha was 0.8521 for
directly from the respondents in both Surabaya role conflict and 0.8939 for role ambiguity.
and Malang after confirmation was received. The turnover intention scale was
This is done to prevent low response rate because constructed from two questionnaire items
almost all of the respondents were not able to adopted from prior study, four indicators from
send back the questionnaire quickly. Kalbers and Fogarty (1995) and three indicators
from Viator (2001). The Cronbachs alpha was
Variables and Measurement of Variabels 0.8884.
Information of respondents demographic
characteristics includes sex, age, education, past
position in public accounting, years working in 4. Findings and Discussion
presents company and concentration area. All
scale items were scored based on seven-point Response Rate and Demographic Profile
Likert scale from stongly disagree to strongly Total questionnaires distributed were 104
agree. questionnaires in public accounting firm, 60
Two main parameters in the instrument test questionnaires in Surabaya, 36 questionnaires in
are validity and reliability testing. Validity Malang and 8 questionnaires obtained privately.
83 questionnaires were returned, but only 75 Note: KA= afective commitment; KC=
questionnaires were complete and usable. The continuance commitment; KIN= performance;
response rate is 79.80%. KK= job satisfaction; KP= role conflict; NB=
The most samples are 38 male respondents turnover intention; TP= role ambiguity
(50.67%) and 37 female respondents (49.33%).
Nearly half of the age respondents, range from Hypothesis 1 (H1) stated that job
21-30 years old is 53 respondents (70.67%), 31- satisfaction has negative influence on turnover
40 years old is 18 respondents (24%), 41-50 intention. The result showed that t-statistical
years old is 2 respondents (2.67%), and under 20 value is 0.2498 (<1.64), so H1 is not supported.
years old is 2 respondents (2.67%). This result does not support discrepancy theory,
The respondents compositions are 62 because it failed to show their satisfaction or
respondents (82.67%) bachelors degree, 7 dissatisfaction of various aspects of the job.
respondents (9.33%) masters degree, 3 Job satisfaction appears since the auditors
respondents (4 percents) diplomas, and 3 begin work. Wijono (2014: 132) states that job
respondents (4%) did not mention their last satisfaction generally increase with age, the
education. lowest job satisfaction was found in the youngest
For position level, most of the respondents employees. Some young people were
are junior. Junior accountant for 49 respondents disappointed with their first jobs because they
(65.33%), 15 respondents senior (20%), 9 failed to get the challenge and responsibility that
respondents supervisor (12%), 1 respondents they want. The majority of the respondents aged
manager (1.33%), and one respondents (1.33%) between 21-30 years as many as 53 individuals.
did not mention his position. This range is young and productive auditor at
Based working period in presents company, work. However, the young auditor cannot obtain
23 respondents worked 2-3 years (30.67%), 21 fulfillment and self-actualization in their first job
respondents worked above 3 years (28%), 16 with a feeling satisfaction. Young auditors still
respondents worked 2-3 years (21.33%), 14 wants much experience before feeling satisfied
respondents worked below 1 year and 1 with what he got in his current job. Because the
respondents (1.33%) did not mention their intention of the auditor in this sample is not to
working period in public accounting. Most work at the firm in the long term. Auditor just
concentration audit area auditor are 70 looking for any job experience or they work in
respondents (93.33%) in audit area, 2 the firm while waiting call another job they want.
respondents (2.67%) in tax area, 0 respondents in So the feeling satisfied or dissatisfied auditors in
system area, and three respondents (4%) did not public accounting firm is not their concern.
mention they concentration audit area. There are Hypothesis 2 (H2) stated that affective
some respondents did not fill questionnaire about commitment has negative influence on turnover
the demographics. However, the questionnaire intention. The results showed that the value of t-
was not disposed considering that demographic statistics for hypothesis 2 is 2.4432 (> 1.64),
data is not used for hypothesis testing. which means a significant, so H2 is supported.
This study uses Partial Least Square (PLS) Coefficient values -0.2939 indicate that affective
with program SmartPLS version 2.0. Hypothesis commitments negatively affect the turnover
testing is done by looking at the value of the intention.
estimates path coefficients and the value of the This results is consistent with that of
critical point (t-statistic). If the value of t-statistic previous research. This findings support Rahayu
is higher than t-table by 1.64 for a one-tailed (2011), Perryer et al. (2010), Hall and Smith
hypothesis, it means that the hypothesis is (2009), Pakawaru (2009), Kalbers and Cenker
supported. The results of hypothesis testing (2007) and Law (2005). Based on hypothesis
reported in Table 1. testing can be explained that the auditors will
continue work in public accounting to maintain
its membership. Auditors will support the goals
Hypotheses Variable T Statistiks and values of the firm. Auditor has an emotional
H1 KK -> NB 0.2498 attachment to the firm, so he worked in the firm
H2 because really want it. However, auditor was
KA -> NB 2.4432
unhappy working at the firm, they have intention
H3 KC -> NB 5.0445 to quit from public accounting. Thus, the
H4 KIN -> NB 0.0542 negative effect on turnover intention can be
H5 KP -> NB 5.6404 supported in this study.
H6 TP -> NB 0.7180 Hypothesis 3 (H3) stated that continuance
commitment has negative influence on turnover
Table 1: Hypotheses Testing Output
intention. The results showed that the value of t-
statistics for the hypothesis 3 is 5.0445 (> 1.64), significant, H5 is supported. The coefficient of
which means a significant, so H3 is supported. 0.5055 indicates that role conflict has positive
Coefficient values -0.4879 indicate that influence on turnover intention. This results
continuance commitment has negative influence support Viator (2001), Lui et al. (2001), and
on turnover intention from public accounting Gregson et al. (1994). The empirical results of
firm. This findings support Perryer et al. (2010) the study prove that the conflict effect the
and Pakawaru (2009). The empirical results of turnover intention. This is consistent with role
the study prove that continuance commitment theory that each of the individual roles require
may affect turnover intention. different behavior, sometimes they may have
Based on the side bet theory from Becker more than one role (multiple roles). The
(1960), commitment achieved because existence of multiple roles in one of these
individuals make a side bet. Auditor make profit- functions can cause discomfort, conflict and
and-loss calculations (costs-benefits). A greater pressure. Auditors have at least two roles. First,
benefit will prevent them to find alternative these individuals act as auditors and the others as
employment. Auditors with high continuance a management service. As auditor, he must keep
commitment will still work in public accounting. a distance with the client. However, as
If auditor felt that there is no other employment management service they must be close to the
alternative for those who offer a better return client. This conditions can make role conflict in
than the current job. The auditor will take into individual. In the end, he may decide to quit
account tradeoffs between stay or quit from from the firm.
public accounting firm to get another job. Hypothesis 6 (H6) states that role
Another consideration is related to the cost and ambiguity has positive influence on turnover
time spent working at the firm. The auditor may intention. The results showed that the value of t-
loss seniority and friendships in public statistics for hypothesis 6 is 0.7180 (<1.64),
accounting. This problem can also be seen from which means insignificant, so H6 rejected. This
opportunity cost point of view. Auditors have the results is not support the role theory.
opportunity to stay or leave public accounting Role theory states that the role ambiguity
firm to get a new job. If the auditor chooses to occurred due to the lack of availability of the
remain in public accounting, then he will lose the necessary information to position specific
chance to get a new job. Auditors who choose to organizations due to the gap of understanding
leave the firm for new jobs, doesnt mean that his and unclear job descriptions. So that auditors
new work place is better than before. He should have a perception vague on its role in completing
start working from beginning and the cost can be the task. However, in general, auditors who are
more expensive. working in public accounting have already been
confident with his role in the workplace. Role
Hypothesis 4 (H4) stated that performance ambiguity occur in the organization relationship
has negative influence on turnover intention. The in public accounting. In general, the main
results showed that the value of t-statistics for accountant position in public accounting is
hypothesis 4 is 0.0542 (<1.64), which means partner, audit manager, supervisor, assistant,
insignificant, so H4 is not supported. Based on senior and junior accountant.
the statistical results of this hypothesis is Role ambiguity occur when an individual
rejected. It can be understood that the reality on has served as audit manager, supervises
the sample should not adversely affect the supervisors and assistant, but the partner can
performance of turnover intention. Usually the intervene his role. It can make audit manager
auditors have high performance would have quit wonder why he always intervened continuesly by
intention of public accounting is low, because the partner. Then, the role ambiguity arises in him.
auditor will be given the opportunity of Role ambiguity can make stress and frustration
promotion and bonuses by the employer as a within the auditor. However, in this study did not
reward for performance. They will be motivated find support for the effect of role ambiguity on
by superiors not to quit because getting auditors turnover intention.
with good performance requires a long process.
However, it does not apply to the respondent in 5. Implications
this study. Auditors seem not to care about their
performance, whether it is considered good or This study examined the effect of job
bad. They keep working at the firms. satisfaction, affective commitment, continuance
Hypothesis 5 (H5) states that role conflict commitment, performance, role conflict, role
has positive influence on turnover intention. The ambiguity on turnover intention. The empirical
results showed that the value of t-statistics for results of the study showed that the turnover
this hypothesis is 5.6404 (> 1.64), which means a intention was influenced by affective
commitment, continuance commitment, and role governance in public accounting can prevent
conflict. Turnover intention is not influenced by auditor leave from public accounting firm. Thus,
job satisfaction, performance, and role many auditors and accounting graduates choose a
ambiguity. That is, an auditor at a young age (21- career in public accounting and are interested in
30 years) do not require the status of an becoming Certified Public Accountants.
established and still have the desire to seek work
experience. Auditor does not matter whether its 6. Limitations
performance is considered good or bad by
supervisors and auditors already confident about This study has several limitations. First, the
his role in the workplace. However, if the young results can be generalized to the public
auditor get what they need (such as affective accounting firm only from sample of this study.
commitment and continuance commitment), they Because this study used convenience sampling.
will keep work in public accounting. Therefore, Researchers cannot use random sampling
the auditor will survive in public accounting if techniques because of the unavailability of
they are not in conflict situations. information on the number of population auditors
This study contributes to the literature who work in public accounting in East Java.
research in behavioral accounting. Predictive the Second, there is only one indicator constructs
turnover intentions can be done by using continuance commitment left because when the
affective commitment, continuance commitment, pilot test two indicators is removed. Then, five
and role conflict variables. indicators removed during field tests because it
Practically, it suggested to the owner of has value less than 0.5.
public accounting firm to create a better working
atmosphere, free of conflict. Good corporate
APPENDIX A
Overview Algoritm
Last Step
NO Variable Note
AVE Communality
1 KA 0.6148 0.6148 Valid
2 KC 1.0000 1.0000 Valid
3 KIN 0.5351 0.5351 Valid
4 KK 0.6043 0.6043 Valid
5 KP 0.6754 0.6754 Valid
6 NB 0.6927 0.6927 Valid
7 TP 0.6937 0.6937 Valid
Note: KA= afective commitment; KC= continuance commitment; KIN= performance; KK= job
satisfaction; KP= role conflict; NB= turnover intention; TP= role ambiguity
people:2
1= No one dislike his/her job more than I dislike mine;
To 7= No one likes his/her job better than I like mine
Affective Commitment
I would be very happy to spend the rest of my career with this organization. 0,8333
I enjoy discussing my organization with people outside of it. 0,8527
I really feel as if this organizations problems are my own. 0.8332
I think I could become as easily attached to another organization as I am to this -
one.2
I do not feel emotionally attached to this organization.1 2 -
I do not feel like part of the family at my organization.1 -
This organization has a great deal of personal meaning for me.3 -
I do not feel a strong sense of belonging to my organization.1 0.5859
[4] Becker, H. S., Notes on the Concept of [10] Gregson, T., Communication Satisfaction:
Commitment. American Journal of Sociology, A Path Analytic Study of Accountants Affiliated
66 (1), 1960, pp. 32-40. with CPA Firms, Behavioral Research
Accounting 2: 1990, pp. 32-49.
[5] Cahyono, D., Persepsi Ketidakpastian
Lingkungan, Ambiguitas Peran, dan Konflik [11] Gregson, T., Wendell, J., & Aono, J., Role
Peran Secagai Mediasi Antara Program Ambiguity, Role Conflict, and Perceived
Mentoring dengan Kepuasan Kerja, Prestasi Enviromental Uncertainty: Are the Scales
Kerja dan Niat Ingin Pindah (Studi Empiris di Measuring Separate Constructs for
Lingkungan Kantor Akuntan Publik (KAP) accountants?, Behavioral Research in
Besar), Diponegoro University, Doctoral Thesis, Accounting 6: 1994, pp. 144-159.
2008. [12] Hair, J.F. Jr., Black, W.C., Babin, B.J.,
[6] Dalton, R., Hill, J. W., & Ramsay, R. J., The Anderson, R.E., & Tatham, R.L., Multivariate
Threat of Litigation and Voluntary Data Analysis, 7th ed., NJ, Pearson Prentice Hall,
Partner/Manager Turnover in Big Six Firms. 2009.
Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 16: [13] Hall. M., & Smith, D., Mentoring and
1997, pp. 379-413. Turnover Intentions in Public Accounting Firms:
A research note, Accounting, Organizations
and Society, 34: 2009, pp. 695-704.
[14] Hartono, J. M., & Abdillah, W., Konsep dan [25] Mustofa, Manajemen Modern Bisnis Kantor
Aplikasi PLS (Partial Least Square) Untuk Akuntan, Jakarta: PT Kompas Media Nusantara,
Penelitian Empiris. Yogyakarta: BPFE- 2014.
Yogyakarta, 2009.
[26] Pakawaru, I. Komitmen Organisasi dan
[15] Kalbers, L. P., & Cenker, W. J., Kepuasan Kerja sebagai Prediktor Keinginan
Organizational Commitment and auditor in Auditor untuk Berpindah (Studi Empiris pada
Public Accounting, Managerial Auditing KAP di Indonesia). Brawijaya University,
Journal 22 (4): 2007, pp. 354-375. Thesis, 2009.
[16] Kalbers, L. P., & Fogarty, T. J., [27] Perryer, C., Jordan, C., Firns. I., &
Profesionalism and Its Consequences: A study Travaglione, A., Predicting Turnover Intention.
of Internal auditors, Auditing: A Journal of The interactive effects of organizational
Practice dan Theory 14 (1): 1995. Pp. 64-86. commitment and perceived organizational
support, Management Research Review 33 (9):
[17] Ketchand, A. A., & Strawser, J. R., The 2010, pp. 911-923.
Exixtence of Multiple Measures of
Organizational Commitment and Experience- [28] Rahayu, Hubungan Antara Komitmen
Related Differences in a Public Accounting Organisasi, Kepuasan Kerja, dan Niat
Setting, Behavioral Research in Accounting, 10: Berpindah Auditor, Simposium Nasional
1998, pp. 109-136. Akuntansi xiv Aceh, 2011.
[18] Lathifah, I., Pengaruh Konflik Pekerjaan- [29] Raza, H., Maksum A., Erlina., & Raja, P.
Keluarga Terhadap Trunover Intentions Dengan L., Antecendents and Consequences of
kepuasan Kerja Sebagai Variabel Intervening. Individual Performance: Analysis of Turnover
Studi Empiris pada Auditor Kantor Akuntan Intention Model (Empirical Study of Public
Publik di Indonesia, Diponegoro University, Accountants in Indonesia), Journal of
Thesis, 2008. Economic and Behavioral Studies 6 (3): 2014,
pp. 169-180.
[19] Law, D. W., Interactive Organizational
Commitment and Hardiness in Public [30] Rhode, J. G., Sorensen, L. E., & Lawler, E.
Accountants Turnover, Managerial Auditing E., An Analysis of personal Characteristics
Journal 20 (4): 2005, pp. 383-393. related to professional staff turnover in public
accounting, Decision Sciences 7 (4): 1976, pp.
[20] Lui, S. S., Hang, Y. N., & Anita, W. N. T., 771-800.
Interrole Conflict as a Predictor of Job
Satisfaction and Propensity to Leave. A Study of [31] Rizzo, J. R., House, R. J., & Lirtzman, S. I.,
Professional Accountants, Journal of Role Conflict and Ambiguity in Complex
Managerial Phychology 16 (6): 2001, pp. 469- Organizations, Administrative Science
484. Quarterly 15 (2): 1970, pp. 150-163.
[21] Meyer, J. P., & Allen, N. J., Testing Side- [31] Setiawan, I. A., & Ghozali, I., Akuntansi
Bet Theory of Organizational Commitment: Keperilakuan: Konsep dan Kajian Empiris
Some Methodological Consideration, Journal Perilaku Akuntan, Semarang: Badan Penerbit
of Applied Psychology 69 (3): 1984, pp. 372-378. Universitas Diponegoro, 2006.
[22] Meyer, J. P., & Allen, N. J. A Three [32] Setiawan, I. A., & Ghozali, I.,
Component Conceptualization of Organizational Multidimensional Causal Path On
Commitment. Human Resource Management Organizational Commitment and Job
Review 1 (1): 1991, pp. 61-89. Satisfaction in Intention to Leave by
Accountants, Journal of Economics, Business,
[23] Mobley, W. H., Intermediate Linkages in and Accountancy Ventura 16 (2): 2013, pp. 339-
the Relationship Between Job Satisfaction and 354.
Employee Turnover, Journal of Applied
Psychology 62 (2): 1977, pp. 237-240. [33] Shafer, W. E., Park, L. J., & Liao, W. M.,
Profesionalism, Organizational-Professional
[24] Muliawan, A. D., Green, P. F., & Robb, A. Conflict and Work Outcomes: A Study of
A., The Turnover Intentions of Information Certified Management Accountants,
Systems Auditor, International Journal of Accounting, Auditing dan Accountability Journal
Accounting Information Systems 10: 2009, pp. 15 (1): 2002, pp. 46-68.
117-136.
[34] Snead, K.,& Harell, A., The Impact of Accounting, Organization and Society 26: 2001,
Psychological Factors on The Job Satisfaction of pp. 73-93.
Senior Auditors, Behavioral Research in
Accounting, (3): 1991, pp. 85-96. [38] Wells, D. L., & Muchinsky, P. M.,
Performance Antecendents of Voluntary and
[35] Steel, R. P., & Ovalle, N. K., A Review and Involuntary Managerial Turnover, Journal of
Meta-Analysis of Research on the Relationship Applied Psychology 55 (2): 1985, pp. 329-336.
Between Behavioral Intentions and Employee
Turnover, Journal of Applied Psychology 69 [39] Wijono, S., Psikologi Industri dan
(4): 1984, pp. 673-686. Organisasi. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media
Group, 2014.
[36] Suwandi & Indriantoro, N., Pengujian
Model Turnover Pasewark dan Strawser: Studi [40] Williams, C. R., & Livingstone, L. P.,
empiris pada Lingkungan Akuntan Publik, Another Lokk at The Relationship Between
Jurnal Riset Akuntansi Indonesia 2 (2): 1999, pp. Performance and Voluntary Turnover,
173-195. Academy of Management Journal 37 (2): 1994,
pp. 269-298.
[37] Viator, R. E., The association of Formal
and Informal Publik Accounting Mentoring with
Role Stress and Related Job Outcomes,