Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
SHALLOW FOUNDATIONS ON
GRANULAR SOIL
AC
A CRITICAL REVIEW
BRAJA M.DAS
Settlement,S
Elasticsettlement,S
Elastic settlement Se
Consolidationsettlement
Consolidation settlement
Primary,Sp
Secondary,
Secondary Ss
S=Se +Sp
p +Ss
Inhislandmarkpaperin1927entitledTheScienceof
Foundations,KarlTerzaghiwrote:
Foundationproblems,throughout,areofsuchcharacterthat
a strictly theoretical mathematical treatment will always be
astrictlytheoreticalmathematicaltreatmentwillalwaysbe
impossible.Theonlywaytohandlethemefficientlyconsists
offindingout,first,whathashappenedonprecedingjobsofa
similarcharacter;next,thekindofsoilonwhichthe
operationswereperformed;and,finally,whytheoperations
have led to certain results. By systematically accumulating
haveledtocertainresults.Bysystematicallyaccumulating
suchknowledge,theempiricaldatabeingwelldefinedbythe
resultsofadequatesoilinvestigations,foundationengineering
could be developed into a semi empirical science
couldbedevelopedintoasemiempiricalscience....
Thebulkoftheworkthesystematicaccumulationof
empirical data remains to be done.
empiricaldataremainstobedone.
Toevaluatethecurrentstateoftheartfor
settlementpredictionsofshallowfoundationsin
p
sand,inanattempttopromotetheuseofshallow
foundations.
AFHWAinitiative
1.
1 FFederalHighwayAdministration(FHWA)
d l Hi h Ad i i t ti (FHWA)
2. TexasA&MUniversity
3
3. Geotest Engineering
4. AmericanSocietyofCivilEngineers(ASCE)
TTexasA&MUniversity
A&M U i it
NationalGeotech ExperimentSite
Approximately12m 28m
5 Square Footings: 1m 1m
1
1.5m 1.5
1 m
2.5m 2.5m
3m 3m (North)
3m 3m (South)
PROBLEM:
PROBLEM:
Predicttheloadat25mmsettlement
InSitu TestSummary
Boreholesheartest
h l h 3
Crossholetest 4
Cone penetration test 7
Conepenetrationtest
Dilatometertest 4
Pressuremeter test 4
Stepbladetest 1
Standardpenetrationtest 6
Numberofparticipants: 31
15consultants
16academics
Israel 1 Brazil 1
Japan
Japan 1 France
France 1
Canada 2 Italy 1
HongKong
Hong Kong 1 Australia
Australia 2
USA 21
MethodsUsedforSettlementPrediction
2222differentmethods
different methods
Schmertmann(1970,1978),BurlandandBurbidge(1985)
andFEMbeingpopular
Footing(m)
Prediction
P di i
591100 1162950 2954271 4075600 4156400
range(kN)
Existingmethodsforpredictingsettlementmaybe
groupedintothreecategories:
A Methodsinwhichobservedsettlementof
structuresarelinkedtoinsitu testresults
(t d d
(standardpenetrationtest,cone
t ti t t
penetrationtest,Pressuremeter tests)
B Semiempiricalmethod
B S i ii l th d
C Useoftheoryofelasticityandmodulusof
elasticity,E
l i i Es
CATEGORYA
TerzaghiandPeck(1948,1967)
Meyerhof(1956,1965)
DeBeer andMartens(1957)
Hough(1969)
PeckandBazaraa (1969)
( )
Burland andBurbidge(1985)
Terzaghi and Peck (1948 1967)
TerzaghiandPeck(1948,1967)
Se 4
Se(1) B1 2
1 B
Se =settlementofprototypefoundationmeasuring
= settlement of prototype foundation measuring
BB
Se(1) =settlementofatestplatemeasuringB
l f l i 1B1
B1 isusuallyoftheorderof0.3mto1m
y
TerzaghiandPeck(1948,1967)
2
3q B
Se CW CD
N60 B 0.3
B 1 Se
2
B 0.3 4 Se(1)
2
3q B
Se
N60 B 0.3
3q 1 Se
Se
N60 4 Se(1)
q N60
Se(1) 0.75
Meyerhof
y
2q(kN/m2 )
Se (mm) (B 1.22m)
N60
1956 2
2
S (mm) 3q (kN/m ) B (B 1.22m)
e
N60 B 0.3
/ 2)
1.25q(kN/m
Se (mm) (B 1.22m)
N60
1965 2
2
S (mm) 2q (kN/m ) B (B 1.22m)
e
N60 B 0 . 3
Note:q increasedbyabout50%
1.25q
Se (mm) CW CD (B 1.22m)
N60
and
2 2
2q((kN/m
/ ) B
) CW CD
Se (mm)
( (B 1.22m))
N60 B 0.3
CW 1.0
and
Df
CD 1.0
4B
Meyerhofs Analysis (1965)
MeyerhofsAnalysis(1965)
B Average q Se(predicted)
Structure (m) N60 (kN/m2) Se (observed)
2.3 o
Se log10 H
C o
o =effectiveoverburdenpressureatadepth
=increaseinpressureduetofoundationloading
H =thicknessoflayerconsidered
qc
C 1.5
o Sepredicted
FieldTestResults: 1.9
Seobserved
DeBeer (1965)
Methodappliedtonormallyconsolidatedsand
Method applied to normally consolidated sand
Reductionfactorneededforoverconsolidated
Reduction factor needed for over consolidated
sand
Hough(1969)
Cc o
Se H log10
1 eo o
C c a(eo b)
Valueof
constant
t t
Typeofsoil a b
Uniformcohesionlessmaterial
Uniform cohesionless material
(uniformitycoefficientCu 2)
Cleangravel 0.05 0.50
Coarsesand 0.06 0.50
Mediumsand 0.07 0.50
Finesand 0.08 0.50
Inorganicsilt 1.00 0.50
Wellgradedcohesionlesssoil
Siltysandandgravel 0.09 0.20
Clean,coarsetofinesand 0.12 0.35
Coarsetofinesiltyy sand 0.15 0.25
Sandysilt(inorganic) 0.18 0.25
PeckandBazaraa(1969)
2 2
2q(kN/m ) B
Se (mm) CW CD
(N1 )60 B 0.3
whereB isinm
(N1)60 =correctedstandardpenetrationnumber
CW =oo//oo at0.5B belowthebottomoffoundation
o=totaloverburdenpressure
o =effectiveoverburdenpressure
p
CD =1.0 0.4(D/q)0.5
=unitweightofsoil
unit weight of soil
PeckandBazaraa (1969)
4N60
(N1 )60 (o 75 kN/m2 )
3.25 0.01o
4N60
(N1 )60 (o 75kN/m2 )
1 0.04o
PeckandBazaraasMethod
( f DA
(afterDAppoloniaetal.1970)
l i l 1970)
GRANULARSOIL
BurlandandBurbidge(1985)
Forgravelor
sandyyggravel N60(a) 1.25N60
Forfinesand or
siltysandbelow
thegroundwater N60(a) 15 0.6(N60 15)
anddN60 15
IfN60(a) [orN60(a)]isapproximatelyconstant(or
increasing)withdepth,
0.75
z B
1.4
BR BR
where
BR =referencewidth=0.3m
width of the actual foundation (m)
B =widthoftheactualfoundation(m)
DepthofStressInfluence,z'
IfN60(a) [orN60(a)]isdecreasingwithdepth,calculate
z=2B andz =distancefromthebottomofthe
foundationtothebottomofthesoftsoillayer(z ).
Use z=2B
Usez 2B orz
or z =zz,,whicheverissmaller.
whichever is smaller.
DepthofInfluence
H H
Correction factor, 2 1
z z
H=thicknessofcompressiblelayer
For Normally Consolidated Soil
ForNormallyConsolidatedSoil
Se 1 .71
0 .14 1 .4
BR [N 60 or N 60 (a ) ]
2
1 .25 L
0 .7
B B q
L BR pa
0 .25
B
whereL =lengthofthefoundation
/ 2)
pa =atmosphericpressure(=100kN/m
ForOverconsolidatedSoil
(q c ; c overconsolidation pressure)
Se 0.57
0.447 1.4
BR [N 60 orN 60(a) ]
2
1.25 L
0.7
B q
B
0.25
L BR pa
B
For Overconsolidated Soil
ForOverconsolidatedSoil
(q c ) :
Se 0.57
0.14 1.4
BR [N 60 or N 60(a) ]
2
1.25 L
0.7
B q 0.67c
B
0.25
L BR pa
B
ProbabilityofExceeding25mmSettlementintheField
(After Sivakugan andJohnson2004)
(AfterSivakugan and Johnson 2004)
Predictedmethods
Predicted Burland &
settlement Terzaghi&Peck Schmertmann Burbidge
(mm) (1948) (1970) (1985)
1 0.00 0.00 0.00
5 0.00 0.00 0.03
10 0.00 0.02 0.15
15 0.09 0.13 0.25
20 0 20
0.20 0 20
0.20 0 34
0.34
25 0.26 0.27 0.42
30 0.31 0.32 0.49
35 0 35
0.35 0 37
0.37 0 44
0.44
40 0.387 0.42 0.51
CATEGORYB
Schmertmann (1970),
Schmertmann etal.(1978)
et al (1978)
Briaud (2007)
Terzaghi,PeckandMesri (1996)
Akbas andKulhawy (2009)
Schmertmann (1970)
q(1 s )
z [(1 2 s )A B]
Es
zE s
Iz (1 s )[(1 2 s )A B]
q
Iz
Se C1C2 q z
Es
q =netstressatthelevelofthefoundation
C 1 =correctionfactorforthedepthofthefoundation
correction factor for the depth of the foundation
=1 0.5(qo /q)
qo =effectiveoverburdenpressureatthelevelofthe
= effective overburden pressure at the level of the
foundation
C 2 =correctionfactortoaccountforcreepinsoil
= correction factor to account for creep in soil
=1+0.2 log(t/0.1)
Es =2qc
Thesame79foundationsrecords
givenbyJeypalan andBoehm(1986)
andPapadopoulos(1992)
wereanalyzedby
y y
Sivakugan etal.(1998).
Schmertmannetal.(1978)
0.5
q
Iz(peak) 0.5 0.1
o
L
Iz(atz 0) 0.1 0.0111 2
B
zp L
0.5 0.0555 1 1
B B
2 0.222 1 4
zo L
B B
Leeetal.(2008)
FEMAnalysis
Iz (peak) 0.5
zp L
0.5 0.11 1 1
B B
L
with a maximum of1 at 6
B
zo L
0.95 cos 1 3 4
B 5 B
L
with
i h a maximum
i f 4 at 6
of
B
Terzaghietal.
(1996)
L
zo 21 log 4
B
I z
z zo
Se q z
z 0 E s
E s (L / B ) L
1 0 .4 log 1 .4
E s ( L / B 1 ) B
E s ( L / B 1 ) 3 . 5q c
0 .1 t days
S e(creep) z o log
qc 1 day
Se R
0.24
B R
gammafunction
SHAPEFACTOR
B
f(L / B) 0.8 0.2
L
ECCENTRICITYFACTOR
e
fe 1 0.33 Center
B
0
0.5
e
fe 1 Edge
B
LOADINCLINATIONFACTOR
(deg)
2
f 1 Center
90
(deg)
0.5
f 1 Edge
360
SLOPE FACTOR
SLOPEFACTOR
0.1
f, d d
0.8 1 3 : 1 slope
B
0.15
f, d d
0.7 1 2 : 1 slope
B
L
Longtermsettlement,includingcreep=
l i l di
0.03
t
Se
t1
t =designlife(inhours)
t 1 =1hour
t 1 hour
Akbas andKulhawy
and Kulhawy (2009)
L1 L2 Method
37 Sites
37Sites
167Axialcompressionfieldloadtests
Mean Se(L1)=(0.23%)B
MeanS = (0 23%)B
Mean Se(L2)
MeanSe(L2) =(5.39%)B
(5.39%)B
Se
Q B
QL2 0.69 Se 1.68
B
B >1m
>1m
QL2 =ultimatebearingcapacityQ
ultimate bearing capacity Qu (Vesic 1973,1975)
1973, 1975)
B 1
B1m
Qu
QL2 Quq
B
Qu N portionofVesic' stheory
Qu f ( , E s , , , B)
1 2s
Se qo (B) Is If
Es
Is =shapefactor=f(m,n)
ForSe atthecenter : =4
L
m
B
H
n
B
2
Fox(1948)
( )
Df L
I f depthfactor f , and s
B B
Se(rigid) 0.93Se(flexible,center)
VariationofIf
L/B
Df /B 1.0 2.0 5.0
Poissons ratio s =0.30
Poissonsratio 0 30
0.20 0.902 0.930 0.951
0.40 0.808 0.857 0.899
0 60
0.60 0 738
0.738 0 796
0.796 0 852
0.852
0.80 0.687 0.747 0.813
1.00 0.650 0.709 0.780
2 00
2.00 0 562
0.562 0 603
0.603 0 675
0.675
Poissonsratios =0.40
0.20 0.932 0.955 0.970
0.40 0.848 0.893 0.927
0.60 0.779 0.836 0.886
0.80 0.727 0.788 0.849
1 00
1.00 0 689
0.689 0 749
0.749 0 818
0.818
2.00 0.596 0.640 0.714
Bowles (1987)
Bowles(1987)
E s ( i ) z
Weighted average, E s
z
z =H
= H or4B,whicheverissmaller
or 4B whichever is smaller
Eo H
IG influence
i fl f t f
factor ,
k Be Be
1
IE 1
Be
3.5 exp1.22 s 0.4 1.6
Df
BerardiandLancellotta(1991)
qB
Se Is
Es
Is=influencefactorforarigidfoundation (s = 0.15)
(Tsytovich,1951)
H 1/B
LL/B
/B 0.5
0 5 1.0
1 0 1.5
1 5 2.0
2 0
1 0.35 0.56 0.63 0.69
2 0 39
0.39 0 65
0.65 0 75
0.75 0 88
0.88
3 0.40 0.67 0.81 0.96
5 0.41 0.68 0.84 0.99
10 0.42 0.71 0.89 1.06
BerardiandLancellotta(1991)reanalyzedfield
p
performanceof130structuresonpredominantly
p y
silicasandasreportedbyBurlandandBurbidge
0.5
o 0.5
Es KE pa (Janbu,1963)
pa
pa =atmosphericpressure
atmospheric pressure
o and atadepthB/2belowthefoundation
K E f N1 60
N1 60 averagecorrectedstandardpenetration
number
b ini the
th influence
i fl zone
Influencezoneforsquarefoundation:
Influence zone for square foundation:
H15 =(1.2to2.8)B
H25=(0.8to1.3)B
(0 8 to 1 3)B
InfluencezoneforL/B
/ 10:
H15 (1.8to2.4)B
25 (1.2to2.0)B
H25 (1.2 to 2.0)B
Skempton(1986)
2
N1 60 N60
1 0.01o
o is
i in kN/ 2
i kN/m
N1 60
60
Dr2
ProcedureforCalculatingS
g E
BerardiandLancellotta(1991)
1. ObtainthevariationofN60 withintheinfluencezone
((i.e.,H
, 25)).
2. Obtain(N1)60 withintheinfluencezone.
Obtain N 1 60 .
3 Obtain
3.
4. ObtainKE atSe/B =0.1%.
0.5
o 0.5
5. Calculate E s KE pa .
pa
ProcedureforCalculatingSE (continued)
6. DetermineIs.
7 Useanequationfromtheoryofelasticityto
7. Use an equation from theory of elasticity to
calculateSe.
8 CalculateS
8. Calculate Se/B.IsitequaltoassumedS
/B Is it equal to assumed Se/B?
/B ?
9. Ifso,thecalculatedSe inStep7istheanswer.
10 Ifnot,useS
10. If not use Se/BfromStep8toobtainthenewK
/B from Step 8 to obtain the new KE.
11. RepeatSteps5,7and8untiltheassumedand
calculated Se/Bareequal.
calculatedS /B are equal
SettlementPredictioninGranularSoils
AProbabilisticApproach
A P b bili ti A h
Sivakugan andJohnson(2004),Geotechnique,Vol.54,
No. 7, 449502.
No.7,449 502.
PredictedSettlement 25mm
Probability of
exceeding25mm
g
Method inthefield
Terzaghi &Peck(1948) 0.26(26%)
Schmertmann (1970) 0.27 (27%)
Burland &Burbidge(1985) 0.42(42%)
B
Berardi
di &Lancellotta
&L ll tt (1991) 0 52 (52%)
0.52(52%)
COMMENTS AND CONCLUSIONS
COMMENTSANDCONCLUSIONS
1. Meyerhofsrelations(1965)simpletouse.Onthe
average,willgiveSe(predicted)/Se(observed) 1.5to2.0.
2. Peck&Bazaraamethod(1969)isnotsuperiorto
thatofMeyerhof(1965).
3. Burland&Burbidge(1965)isanimprovedmethod
overthatofMeyerhof(1965)andPeck&Bazaraa
(1969).
Difficulttoestimateoverconsolidationpressure
fromfieldexploration.
4 Modified
4. Modifiedstraininfluencefactormethodsof
strain influence factor methods of
Schmertmannetal.(1978),Terzaghietal.(1996),
Salgado(2008)andLeeetal.(2008)willgive
g ( ) ( ) g
reasonableresultswithpropervaluesofEs.
gg
5. SuggestedEs relations:
s
E s(L / B) L
1 0.4 log 1.4
E s(L / B1) B
Reliabilityistheprobabilitythattheactual
settlementwouldbelessthanthatcomputed
byaspecificmethod.
Inchoosingamethodfordesign,itallcomes
h h df d ll
downtokeepingacriticalbalancebetween
reliability and accuracy,
accuracy whichcanbedifficult
which can be difficult
attimes,knowingthenonhomogeneous
natureofsoilingeneral.Wecannotbeover
g
conservativebut,atthesametime,notbe
accurate.
WeneedtokeepinmindwhatKarlTerzaghi
id i th 45th JamesForrestLectureatthe
saidinthe45 J F tL t t th
InstituteofCivilEngineersinLondon:
Foundation
Foundationfailuresthatoccurarenolonger
failures that occur are no longer
anactofGod.