Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Margot Grotstein
Ms. Levesque
Communications
26 January 2017
Bears Ears National Monument needs to be saved and we are the only people who can do
it. Bears Ears is located in southern Utah and just recently became a national monument. Many
people want to take away Bears Ears status as a national monument for a variety of reasons, none
of which are practical or valid. Bears Ears should remain a national monument because it is a
beautiful and rare place with cultural significance and it conserves much land.
Bears Ears has a plentiful amount of land and with the monument status we can preserve
the land for future generations without the inevitability graffiti and other forms of vandalism,
which could destroy and disrupt the beauty and significance of the land. Some believe that Bears
Ears Monument takes up too much land, but every inch less land Bears Ears has is an inch that
can be destroyed and tainted by humans. For our future generations to see the beauty of Southern
Supporters of changing Bears Ears status and making it public ground include big oil
companies who want to use it to drill into the ground and mine the oil. This will not only destroy
the land but also pollute our environment. The argument could be made for the people of the
neighboring town that big oil in the metaphorical backyards will add to the economy. But I argue
that once the oil is drilled dry, the people of the neighboring town will be left with nothing, no
Grotstein 2
land for tourists to come and see and no oil for a company use to drill out the ground. The
economy will rise and plummet, which will be bad for everyone in the vicinity of Bears Ears. If
Bears Ears is kept as a National Monument, the people of the neighboring town will have a
Some other reason to support Bears Ears in the fight to keep its national monument status
is the tribal significance it has. Bears Ears has been and currently is home to dozens of tribes
over hundreds of years and the land is sacred ([NATIVE AMERICAN CONNECTIONS
]). The idea of creating a national monument for tradition and culture of a small group of people
sounds a little absurd until you realize the benefits in it for everyone. The conservationists will
save miles of land, the neighboring communities will have a steady flow of income, the native
flora and fauna will have a safe place to live and will be perceived, Native Americans can
preserve and live on their land, and tourists can visit a beautiful place to visit.
Opposing viewpoints to the matter of the status of Bears Ears include oil, economy,
farming, land ownership, and space. Each one of these is unsubstantial compared to the plus side
of keeping its status as a national monument. The oil will dry up, the farmers can find other
places to farm, and land will become less important with more stable economy which will come
from the steady flow of tourism. All the problems that can be presented against Bears Ears
Finally, The benefits of keeping Bear's Ears a national monument, which include
conservation, culture, income, economy, and beauty, far outweigh the negatives. Bears Ears
should remain a national monument. for the people around Bears Ears, for the animals that live
in Bear's Ears for the oil that will stay under Bears Ears, and for the beauty of Bears Ears. Please
Grotstein 3
support the movement to keep Bears Ears status as a National Monument by calling or emailing
your representative.
Work cited
"Bears Ears Inter-Tribal Coalition | Support Your New Bears Ears National Monument."
"Proposal Overview." Bears Ears InterTribal Coalition. N.p., n.d. Web. 01 Feb. 2017.
COTTLE, MICHELLE. "Keeping the Presidents Hands Off Utahs Land." The Atlantic.
Eilperin, Juliet. "A Major Native American Site Is Being Looted. Will Obama Risk
Armed Confrontation to save It?" The Washington Post. WP Company, 6 June 2016.
Board, Editorial. "Opinion | Bears Ears' Critics Should Take a Deep Breath." The