Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Engels was more deterministic, analyzed from the general to the particular, like
Plato
In the Late 17th century, the traditional analysis of pol order based on scarcity was
replaced by one based on abundance, due to the discovery of America
But this was soon refuted by poverty, and it led to crystallization of socialist ideas
Even Marx was Eurocentric, and there is very less difference between an liberal Mill,
socialist Marx
Marx aspired to create a social phil that articulated the aspirations of the rising
proletariat
But Hegel contended that the revolution would lead to the emergence of nation
states
While MARX believed that it is a prelude to a more fundamental and total revolution
of the masses, beyond the nation states
Acc to him, FR was a political revolution,, and the next step was a social revolution
which would be
His relationship between them was like the one between Plato and the Sophists
He borrowed more from their ideas than he cared to admit, so was indebted to their
ideas
Said that destruction of capitalism was inevitable, coz it had given rise to its own
grave diggers
Capitalism made man acquisitive, ruthlessly competitive and selfish, and eroded
natural instincts of compassion, fraternity and solidarity
Made socialism a very possible reality, not just a mere pleasing dream, by removing
the early socialism of its eccentricities and fantasies
He conceded that human mind was capable of comprehending the external world,
and was a dynamic force
Emphasized on absolute autonomy of the human mind, and freed men from all
superstitions of transcendent objects
For Marx, key idea was not history of phil, but that of economic production and
social relations that accompanied it
Said that capitalism developed as a reason of certain historical factors, and would
disappear in due course of time
Unlike Hegel, who applied his dialectics to phil world, Marx applied it to the material
world
THE MODE OF PRODUCTION AND EXCHANGE WAS THE FINAL CAUSE OF ALL SOCIAL
CHANGES AND POLITICAL REVOLUTIONS
It means that, for minds or thoughts to change, society has to change first
Both appealed to an emotion above self interest as a reason for driving change-
For Hegel it was national pride, for Marx it was the loyalty among workers for a
better future
Who critiqued the Hegelian process of putting the thought before existence
It was existence that preceded thought, so it was neither God nor thought, but the
individual who was the FOCUS
In Hegels phil, the individual, instead of remaining the subject, became a predicate
of universal substance
THE PHILOSOPHERS HAVE ONLY INTERPRETED THE WORLD IN DIFFERENT WAYS,
THE POINT, HOWEVER, IS TO CHANGE IT :: MARX
Marx replaced God with Money, and said that man worships money as it dominates
him
Demarcated the stages which were necessary for reaching the goal of Communism
Practical side of human activity, rather than speculative thought as the moving
force of history
Considered the mode of production as the economic base, the real foundation of
society
This economic base determined and conditioned the superstructure, which consists
of state, law , govt, art, culture, phil
When the economic base of society changed , there was a change in consciousness
1- PRIMITIVE COMMUNISM
2- SLAVERY
3- FEUDALISM
4- CAPITALISM
5- COMMUNISM
Except in the last one, each one had an inherent contradiction that made conflict
imminent
This can be done if man Is freed from religion and private property
2 classes in every society, one who owned the means of production and one who
sold their labor
FREEMAN AND SLAVE, PARTICIAN AND PLEBIAN, GUILD MASTER AND JOURNEYMAN,
in a word-
He objected to the idea that class struggle had ended with the rise of bourgeoisie
He said that it was the desire among the industrial proletariat to bring about
economic equality that kept class struggle and revolutionary change alive
The actual reality was hidden, which Marx described as FALSE CONSCIOUSNESS
THE IDEAS OF THE RULING CLASS ARE IN EVERY EPOCH THE RULING IDEAS
The ruling material force of the society is at the same time its ruling intellectual
force
ANALYSIS OF CAPITALISM
Marx said that the man who owns no other property than labor is always a
slave to the owners of property
Even if state owned the means of production, wage labor would still continue. This
is not real Socialism, but a new variant of capitalism, called STATE CAPITALISM
Today, many critics argue that the USSR wasnt a true socialist state, but a
tyrannous form of state capitalism
But despite all these uses, capitalism has outlived its utility coz of the immense
suffering and hardships it has caused. It would have to yield itself to a new
socialist mode of production.
Examples of suffering-
Eviction of peasants from their land, loss of their sources of income, their
vagabondage, assembling in cities where they had become dependent on starvation
wages, creation of the proletariat (have nots)
The exploitation of the proletariat can be measured by surplus value- the difference
between the wages paid to the laborer and the final price for which the goods were
sold.
DRAWBACKS OF CAPITALISM-
CLASSICAL economists believed in the trickle-down theory, but Marx said that the
gulf widened.
Because of all this, the individual, who is also the producer, rebels against society
As working class increased in number , it got bargaining skills and became better
organized
The clarion call given to the workers was to unite, shed their chains and conquer the
world
He did not take cognizance of the fact that A HATRED OF CAPITALISM NEED
NOT LEAD TO SOCIALISM, AS IT CAN TAKE OTHER POLITICAL DIRECTIONS
1- DECOLONISATION
2- UNIVERSAL ADULT FRANCHISE/ DEMOCRACY
3- SOCIAL SECURITY MEASUES, LABOR WELFARE LAWS AND STATE
INTERVENTION TO CREATE DEMAND AND BOOST EMPLOYMENT
Marxist predictions did not come true, He had said that people will either become
bourgeoisie or proletariat. But this didnt happen, and middle class grew constantly
In such a situation, the dictator, with the support of state apparatus, became its
guardian