Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
NB: Examples of rules from the Steel Code set out below are selected to give a
general impression of its major provisions.
The purpose of carrying out structural analysis is to calculate the maximum values of
forces (moment, shear force and axial force) for design and check against its capacity.
A B
L = 10m
X
Fy = 0,
50 - 10X - S = 0
S = 50 - 10X (2)
N=0
Bending moment diagram (BMD) moment is always plotted on the tension side of
the beam
compression
tension
X = 5 m,
X = 2.5 m M = 125 kNm
M = 93.75 kNm
Shear force diagram (SFD)
50 kN
50 kN
Maximum bending moment = 125 kNm
Maximum shear force = 50 kN
Maximum axial force = 0
b x
d
x y
Department of Civil Engineering, Monash University x
File: Bwong/CIV2222 Edition Date: 3:99
Subject CIV2222 : Structural Engineering 4
Steel Framed Structures
M
=
x
y
I
The beam is under maximum stress when M and y are at maximum values. That is, M
= Mmax (obtained from structural analysis above) and y = d/2.
The extreme fibre of the cross-section starts to yield when x = fy. Hence, the moment
capacity that a cross-section can take is
My = fy I/(d/2) = fy Z
Ms=KMy
My
rotation
In reality, when the whole section becomes yielded (in contrast to extreme fibre only),
the moment capacity can be increased by a shape factor K where
Hence,
Ms=KMy = fyKZ = fy S K = S/Z
b
Rectangular section : I = bd3/12
d2 d1 d1 d2
Non-symmetric section
Use of non-symmetric steel sections is not uncommon in steel structures. For instance,
the section of a steel gantry girder consists of an I-section and a channel. The moment
capacity of this section may require the values of S and Z.
I = (bd3/12 + Ah2)
The sign includes the contributions from all elements of the cross-section and h is the
distance between the centroid of the element and the centroid C-C of the overall
cross-section. Therefore, the first step usually is to find the location of C-C using first
moment of area before the moment of inertia I can be calculated.
b
d
Area A h
C C
200 mm
Example
20 mm
T-section
N.A.
500 mm
(200x20 + 500x10) yc
= 200x20x510 + 500x10x250 yc
yc = 365.5 mm
10 mm
1 200 mm
(h)1 = 510 - 365.5 = 144.5 mm 20 mm
(h)2 = 365.5 - 250 = 115.5 mm (h)1
N.A.
IN.A. = 200x203/12 + 200x20x(144.5)2
500 mm (h)2
+ 10x5003/12 + 10x500x(115.5)2
yc
= 254,522,250 mm4
10 mm
2
S* Ru
The following table summarises the values of capacity factor for steel design.
(Refer also to Appendix C on loading and factors of safety).
The main problem here is deflection, and the code suggests the following limits
Long beams supporting floors and machinery should be checked for resonance.
Limits on human tolerance for whole-body vibration are given in AS 2670.
Lateral drift of unbraced frames and multistorey buildings subject to wind and
earthquake loading "should be considered".
For industrial buildings, suggested limits on horizontal deflection at eaves due to wind
loading are:
with metal cladding, no gantry cranes, internal partitions not touching walls:
limit = column height/150
Other items listed under the heading of "serviceability" are design against slip in
friction-grip connections, and degree of protection against corrosion.
* Note that mild steel is a very "forgiving" material because of its long yield plateau.
At "stress raisers" such as re-entrant corners and bolt holes where very high stresses
would otherwise exist, the steel yields and flows in a plastic manner, but does not
(normally) fracture. Our approach to design and our calculations can be much simpler
than if we had to calculate the exact stress at every point in the structure. We are able
to compute simply the general level of stress in a member from formulas such as P/A
or M/Z. We may work out the force in each bolt in a small bolted joint under tension
by simply dividing the force by the number of bolts (see later).
However, there is a danger of complacency. Even mild steel may suffer brittle fracture
if subjected to low temperature and tri-axial tensile stress in the vicinity of a stress
raiser. Such tensile stresses may arise due to causes (e.g. the cooling of welds) which
are not immediately obvious.
Where the live load Q may vary from one span (or room) to another and exceeds
three-quarters of the dead load G, analysis must be carried out for
factored live load on all spans
factored live load on alternate spans
factored live load on two adjacent spans
The second case results in high BMs at mid-span in the loaded beams, and the third
causes high BM over the support between the two loaded spans.
The appropriate load factors for both the live load and dead load are given in
Appendix A (p. 113).
Steel is produced in various forms suitable for use in structures. These include "plate",
"rounds, bars and rods", "angles", "channels" and "I-sections". The I-sections are
produced as "beam" sections with Iyy much less than Ixx and "column" sections with
Iyy closer to Ixx (see later). Most of these sections are produced by rolling red hot
steel. Most sections now have parallel flanges: the "universal" beam and column
sections, and the channels. However, some "taper flange" Is and channels are still
produced. It is possible to make very large sections (e.g. for bridge beams) by
welding plate into the form of an I or box. In 1991 BHP introduced a range of "off-
the-shelf" welded I sections. See "Hot Rolled and Structural Products", BHP Steel.
3.2.1 Tension
3.2.2 Bending
The bending moment which a beam can carry before its flanges start to yield is
Zfy . If the moment is increased still further, yielding spreads throughout the cross-
section. Total collapse occurs, theoretically, at a moment Mp = Sfy where S is a
geometrical constant similar to Z. S is called the "plastic section modulus". The
principal aim of beam shape is to maximize Z and S for a given amount of material by
spreading it away from the neutral axis. The I section is ideal for this, as shown in the
table below. This also increases greatly the second moment of area Ixx , thus reducing
the amount of deflection under load. Unfortunately, this process reduces Iyy , making
the beam very flexible in the lateral direction, and susceptible to "lateral buckling" (see
later).
The simple Euler formula for buckling load of a column 2 EI/L2 is inaccurate
at slenderness ratios normally found in practice. However, it shows that second
moment of area is an important factor in column strength. A column may buckle in
either the x or y direction so it is important to have Ixx and Iyy of similar magnitude.
(An exception occurs if the column receives support in one direction (e.g. from a wall)
or is subjected to large bending moments in one direction).
Ad 2 Ad Ad
1.0
4 2 2
4.1 Grades
The most common (for rolled sections) is the newly introduced Grade 300PLUS
(replacing the once popular Grade 250), followed by Grade 350. These may be
obtained with notch ductile qualities (with suffix L0 or L15) and/or weather-resistant
qualities (with prefix WR) "off-the shelf". Welded sections are produced in Grades
300 and 400 steel and WR350/1L0. Hollow sections are produced with prefixes C
and H, depending on whether they are hot formed or cold formed, in Grades 200,
250, and 350.
The yield stress that may be used in design varies with the type of product and the
thickness of material. (Thinner portions have better properties, having undergone
more working in the rolling process, and are less prone to lamination).
Weathering steels are a special case - they are Grade C350 only, and fy is C340 MPa
regardless of thickness.
Plate in Grades 250, BHP-300 PLUS for WC and WB, and 350
Grade fu
As hot-rolled sections cool down after rolling, the tips of the flanges and the middle of
the web cool, and therefore harden, more quickly than the rest of the cross-section.
As the mass of material at the junctions between the flanges and web cools and
contracts in the longitudinal direction, the harder parts resist the contraction and are
placed in a state of compression. The junctions, being unable to contract as far as
they would otherwise, are placed in tension. The resulting distribution of stress is
shown below.
A similar effect occurs when plates are welded at the junction to form an I-section.
Residual stresses may be as high as fy /2. They greatly affect the behaviour of steel
members, particularly columns.
Their presence is ignored in many theoretical analyses (e.g. Euler and Perry Robertson
theories of column buckling) but allowance must always be made in some way for their
effects on actual behaviour.
The top group of figures show what happens (theoretically) within a steel cross-section
as the bending moment is steadily increased. (This explanation ignores the
Figure (1) shows the linear strain and stress distributions which exist in a beam at low
BM, when the material is still within the elastic portion of the stress-strain curve (AB).
As the BM is increased, material at the top and bottom reaches yield strain and fy
(Figure 2). If the BM is increased further, the strain at top and bottom exceeds y but
the strain diagram remains linear (3). However, the stress in the outer layers cannot
exceed fy . The steel in these layers is now in the region BC of the stress-strain curve.
With further increase in moment (4) the amount of material at strain greater than y
increases. Yielding extends closer to the neutral axis, as shown by the flat portion of
the stress diagram. If the BM is increased further (5), the strain in the outer layers
exceeds s, the strain at which strain-hardening commences. Because strain is still
proportional to distance from the neutral axis, the stress-strain curve is reproduced in
the stress diagram (5). Eventually, the cross-section becomes almost completely
plastic and a "plastic hinge" develops.
In theory, strain hardening is ignored and the stress diagram of Figure (6) is assumed
to exist at failure.
T
d
Force on compression zone C = b .fy
2
2
d
Moment capacity M p = C . = bd f y = Sf y
2 4
2
2
S (for rectangular section only) = bd c . f . Z = bd
4 6
Non-symmetric section
fy
T
yt
X X
yc
C
fy
For a section of arbitrary shape, C = Acfy and T = AT fy if the section is made of the
same material with yield stress = fy; Ac = area under compression; AT = area under
tension.
For equilibrium, T = C, Ac = AT . This is also the condition whereby the neutral axis
X-X (also called the equal area axis) divides the cross-section into two equal parts.
For symmetric sections, the equal area axis coincides with the centroid of the section.
For non-symmetric sections, they are different.
Also, take moment about X-X:
M p = Ty t + Cy c
= ( At y t + Ac y c ) f y = Sf y
Hence, S = first moment of area about the equal area axis.
e.g.
For an I-section,
200
40
220
100
40 400
40
Department of Civil Engineering, Monash University
For a T-section,
200
40
120
50
40 400 Equal area axis
150
y
Note : This section has an area which is about 82% of the full I-section but its
plastic section modulus S, hence its moment capacity MP, is only about 58% of
the full I-section. This is one of the reasons why I-sections are effective in
strength.
has not been taken into account in calculations. However, this is only true in sections
such as I's where material is concentrated at the extremities where the strain-hardening
is most effective. A measure of this concentration is the ratio of S/Z which is 1.5 for a
rectangular cross-section, about 1.15 for typical I's and 1.7 for a solid circular cross-
section.
S
1.15 1.50 1.70
Z
Note: Do not use the approximate relationship S/Z 1.15 to find S from Z or
vice versa.
In the circular cross-section the proportion of material that will benefit from strain
hardening is small. Hence AS4100 does not permit the use of a section modulus
greater than 1.5 times the elastic value.
Choosing a suitable size and shape for steel beams is a process of making an intelligent
estimate and then checking the beam for several possible modes of failure. Because
steel beams usually consist of thin plate-like elements they are susceptible to certain
special modes of failure.
Check Sfy M *
2. Applied BM causing local buckling of the compression flange and parts of the web
in compression.
Check M s M *
or
4. Shear force causes web to yield or buckle. (Shear force is carried mainly by
web).
Check Vu V*
Check
Usually, one of these modes dominates. Few rolled sections suffer from (2).
Beams in buildings are normally governed by (1) or (3), although (8) may be a
problem. The danger of lateral buckling (3) may be avoided by providing lateral
support where practicable and economically justifiable. Modes (4) and (5) are hardly
ever a problem in buildings unless holes are cut in webs to allow air-conditioning ducts
and other services to pass through. They are more common in bridge beams. Modes
(6) and (7) can be avoided by adding stiffeners to the web (see later).
7.1 General
If all goes well, the entire flange of a steel beam will reach fy . However, if the plate is
"slender" it may buckle locally before fy is reached.
(a) Make sure the plates are not slender enough to permit buckling before yield.
(b) Accept the reduction in strength due to buckling and calculate the reduced BM
capacity, Zefy where Ze S.
The choice depends on the economics of a particular situation. Either course requires
a knowledge of how plate buckling is influenced by slenderness.
The simplest approach is to calculate the elastic buckling stress of idealised plates
ignoring residual stress and initial lack of straightness.
The flange of a box beam is reasonably free to rotate at its edges because the webs
may bend easily. It is thus possible to adopt the following theoretical model.
The formula obtained for displacement (assuming the material remains elastic) is:
m y n z
u = sin sin
b I
where
u = deflection at any point
m = no. of waves in y direction (normally unity)
n = no. in z direction.
The solution for the stress in the flange when buckling occurs (the "elastic critical
stress") is
Ek
2
M crit = f =
01 2
Z b
12(1 - 2 )
t
The value of the critical moment at which elastic buckling occurs Zfo1 is related to the
number of waves which develop in the longitudinal direction. These waves are of
length 2b.
Hence for the high values of L/b found in practice, we can take k = 4.
If we wish to make sure that fo1 is at least as great as fy , taking E = 200,000 MPa and
= 0.3 we can show that
b fy
53.8
t 250
this is known as the YIELD LIMIT (for compression flanges between two webs).
Hence the flange can be prevented from buckling before it yields if we place a limit on
b/t.
NB: Considerations such as the above are an important part of the process
of adapting complex theories to suit the needs of everyday design.
The flanges of I-beams are reasonably modelled as a plate hinged along one side (the
line of the web) and free along the other.
2
b
k = 0.425 +
L
for long plates k 0.425
b f
f o 1 f y when 17.5
y
t 250
The above analyses are conservative because the connection between flange and web
is rigid and the web must also buckle to allow the flange to do so.
b fy
The "yield limit" on ensures that the plates will not buckle before the
t 250
maximum stress in the cross-section reaches fy . If we want to ensure that the plates
will not buckle before the entire section becomes plastic, we shall need a more severe
limit. This is called the "plastic limit". Our theory will have to take account of the
post-buckling behaviour described above.
The above theory is, like the Euler theory for columns, accurate only for very slender
elements. Reasonably compact elements suffer yielding and strain hardening.
This can be allowed for (approximately) by using the strain-hardening modulus Est
instead of E.
b fy
This suggests a plastic limit for of 23.0 for plates hinged along two edges.
t 250
However, tests suggest this is too conservative, and that the limits are more like
In the cases considered above, the plates were subjected to stresses which were
uniform across their width.
If an I-beam is bent about its minor axis, the stress distribution in the outstand is
triangular.
Vertical plates, including webs of plate girders are subjected to triangular distributions
which include tension.
B
A final case is that of the circular hollow section which obviously requires special
mathematical treatment.
These cases have all been analyzed, and plastic and yield limits determined in a similar
fashion.
As a result of all this theorizing, steel sections composed of plates are classified
according to the b/t ratios of their most slender components.
Class 1 "Compact". Plates in this category will strain-harden before local buckling.
The section may be designed for full plastic moment Sfy (but 1.5ZfY).
Class 2 Plates will reach yield stress before buckling and can therefore resist at
least Zfy . Interpolation permitted between this limit and the limit for Class
1.
Class 3 Plates will buckle locally before Zfy is reached. A reduced moment
capacity must be calculated.
The buckling of plates is affected slightly by the level of residual stress. AS4100 lists
the limits as follows: (AS4100-Table 5.2).
Note that a deformation limit is also specified. Very slender plates may deflect a
great deal before their resistance becomes so small that they can be said to have
b fy
"failed". Therefore a third limit is imposed on to ensure that deflections do
t 250
not become excessive.
SR 10 16 35
HR 9 16 35
LW, CF 8 15 35
HW 8 14 35
SR 30 45 90
HR 30 45 90
LW, CF, 30 40 90
HW 30 35 90
SR 10 25 -
HR 9 25 -
LW, HW, CF 8 22 -
All 82 115 -
HW = heavily welded
The procedure when checking a section is to work out the slenderness e of all plate
elements :
b fy
e =
t 250
The e for the element with the highest value of the ratio e/ey is adopted as
representative of the slenderness of the entire section, and becomes "s".
The value of ey for this element becomes sy for the section and its value of ep
becomes sp .
If s sp the section is compact, and its capacity is Sfy but 1.5 Zfy .
The reduced capacity in Class 3 may be calculated using the "effective width concept".
The effective width is taken as the width corresponding to the yield limit:
be fy
= sy
t 250
250
i.e. effective width be = sy t < b
fy
Alternatively, the curve in the graph may be approximated by factoring the moment
capacity Zfy by
2
sy
s for plates with max. comp. stress at an unsupported edge and zero or tension
at the other.
sy
s for all other cases. (See below for more information)
Ms = fy Ze
d1 t
length fy
where e = and ey = AS4100 - Table 5.2.
thickness 250
For one single element, such as flange and web, length/thickness = b1/T for flange and
d1/t for web.
(ii) Non-compact sections (sp < s sy) - minor local buckling effects:
sy s
Ze = Z + (S Z) for plate sections (eg.I-sections).
sy sp
sy
Ze = Z
s
sy
2
Ze = Z
s
Mixed sections
Choose the worst case for calculation. For instance, if flange is non-compact and web
is compact, use the equation for non-compact sections and values of s, sy and sp
are from the plate element (either flange or web) which has the greater value of e/ey.
bf = d = 400 mm
tw = tf = 10 mm tf
Grade 300 steel tw
(Z = 1855238 mm3, S = 2.08 x 106 mm3)
d
Solution :
tf
Flange bf
Flange is slender
Web
400 320
e = = 45.3
10 250
ep = 82, ey = 115, e/ey = 0.39
web is compact
Whole section
Section is slender.
s = e = 22.1, sp = 9, sy = 16
Ze = Z(sy/s) = 1855238 (16/22.1) = 1343159 mm3
&
Trahair,N.S. & Bradford,M.A.,The behaviour and design of
steel structures to AS4100, 1998, Chapter 6.
REQUIRED
Slender beams buckle sideways even under perfectly vertical loads. The beam curves
in the horizontal as well as the vertical plane and twists about its longitudinal axis. In a
simply supported beam, as shown above, the movement of the cross-section at the
mid-span is as shown below.
Before After
(An excellent example of this type of adaptation is the paper by Kerensky, Flint and
Brown, Proc. ICE, Part III Vol. 5, Aug. 1956 pp. 396-461, setting out the
development of the beam buckling rules for the old British BS153 code).
It is necessary, however, for the practical designer to know the parameters which
affect the buckling strength of beams and understand how they do so.
(b) whether the ends are free to twist about the longitudinal axis.
(c) whether the ends are free to rotate about a vertical axis.
(d) whether there is any lateral support provided along the length of the beam.
(e) whether the load is applied to the top or bottom flange, or through the web.
(f) the shape, and hence the geometrical properties of the cross-section.
To reduce this complexity, it helps if we define a standard case so that all practical
cases can be compared with it.
Uniform BM;
Prismatic beam;
Twist and lateral deflection at ends prevented;
Flange ends free to rotate about vert. axis;
Beam ends free to warp;
Load applied at shear centre.
EI y GJ
1 + EI2w
2
M b=
Ls GJ Ls
3
Iw is the "warping constant" which appears in the formula Mw = EI w d 3 where z is
dz
measured along the longitudinal axis.
(The St. Venant theory of torsion is covered in e.g. Ford, H. Advanced mechanics of
materials. H620.112 F 699A2).
Department of Civil Engineering, Monash University
The complex formula above is very rarely used in practice, but values of J and Iw for
standard I-sections are provided in the BHP booklet "Hot rolled and structural
products".
Analyses for cases where conditions are different from the standard case can be
rearranged to give a similar formula differing mainly by a factor attached to L so that
design can be based, as with columns "effective length" equal to kb L (see rule 5.6.3
of AS4100), where L = span.
This minimizes Mb. Any other shape of BMD will result in a higher Mb than
indicated by the formula for the standard case.
(b) Obviously, if the ends of the beam are free, or partially free, to twist, it
is easier for the whole beam to twist out of shape and hence buckle. The standard
case assumes complete restraint against twisting at the ends. Anything less will mean a
lower Mb than for the standard case.
(c) When a beam buckles, the top flange curves sideways. In the standard case the ends
of the top flange are free to rotate about a vertical axis.
If this rotation is prevented it is harder for the beam to buckle. Mb is greater than for
the standard case.
(d) The effect of lateral restraint at intervals along the beam is to force the beam to adopt a
more complex buckled shape. Because it is harder to force the beam into this position,
Mb is increased.
A concrete floor slab sitting directly on the top flange (or somehow securely attached
to it) prevents sideways movement and suppresses lateral buckling. Mb is then
Ms(=Zefy ). In reality, Mb cannot be greater than Ms because the maximum capacity
that a section can achieve is Ms. Hence, in the case when the top flange is restrained
by a concrete floor slab, Mb = Ms.
(e)
W
e R e R e W
R
If the load is free to move sideways when the beam buckles, a twisting moment is
set up between the reactions R at the supports, and the load W. This equals eW
where e is the sideways eccentricity. As can be seen above, e is greatest when the
load is on the top flange (1). The standard case assumes that the load is applied
through the centroid of the cross-section (2). For case (1) Mb is reduced. For
case (3) it is increased.
(f) Note the influence of Iy , J, Iw and L on the value of Mb given in the formula.
AS4100 adopts the confusing convention of using L for the distance between
points of lateral support. This reflects the great importance of this factor in
governing lateral buckling, but leads to confusion with the traditional use of L to
denote span.
Note that high values of L/ry are associated with low values of Mb and that I-
sections have low values of ry .
The constant J is a measure of stiffness against torsion. "Open" sections such as Is,
Channels, and angles have low values of J and twist easily in comparison with other
sections. Box sections and tubes have high values of J and therefore good
resistance to buckling. For I sections, resistance to twisting is related to the ability
of the flanges to resist horizontal bending (one goes in each direction). This is again
related to Iy for the section.
I-section subjected to
torsion only
4 A2o ds
Note that for box sections Iw = 0 and J = where = o taken
t
round the circumference and Ao is the area enclosed within a line tracing the
centreline of the walls.
(g) Resistance of the ends to warping may occur in beams built into brick or concrete.
This factor is rarely considered in practical design.
8.4.1 General
In the Australian design procedure, the first step is to classify the various ways in which
a cross-section may be supported against rotation (about the longitudinal axis) and
lateral movement. In this, it is important to identify the flange which will move the
furthest (sideways) when buckling occurs. This is the "critical flange". [See rules 5.5
and 5.4.2]
If a segment of a beam is supported at both ends, the critical flange is the compression
flange. If the segment is free at one end (cantilever) the critical flange is the first flange
encountered by an arrow drawn in the direction of loading.
SECTION RESTRAINT
Lateral movement prevented Twist rotation Type of
Code rule prevented restraint
AS4100
At critical Elsewhere on
flange cross-section
5.4.2.1 (a) Effective + Effective or = "Full" (F)
Partial
5.4.2.1 (b) Effective + Effective = "Full" (F)
5.4.2.2 Effective + Partial = "Partial" (P)
5.4.2.4 Effective + None = "Lateral" (L)
None None None = "Unrestrained" (U)
5.4.2.3 of critical = "Rotational
flange in plan* restraint"
About the longitudinal axis.
*
"Twist rotation of the critical flange in plan" refers to case (c) above, rotation of the
flange about a vertical axis.
Rafter
Flybrace
Either flange of rafter may be "critical" because rafters (in e.g. factories) are often
subjected to upward load due to wind pressure and suction.
It is assumed that the designer will normally provide restraint at regular intervals, and
the beam will be split into "segments" and "sub-segments" if necessary. These terms
are defined in Section 5 of AS4100. Note that the term "section" of a beam refers
to a cross-section at a particular point, and not to a length of the beam.
A "sub-segment" is a portion with one end laterally restrained and the other restrained
in any way. Sub-segments are marked out by lateral supports applied to the critical
flange to provide "lateral restraint". (Rule 5.4.2.4).
This unreal structure which appeared in the draft version of the code demonstrates the
terminology. It was not included in the final version.
We can now define "segments which have full lateral support" and which therefore
have a "nominal member capacity in bending" Mb equal to the nominal section
capacity Ms.
If the beam has lateral support at intervals (as in the above figure) it qualifies under this
simple rule as having "full" lateral support (Mb Ms) if both ends are fully or partially
restrained, and it, or its sub-segments fulfil the equation
250
L/ r y (80 + 50 m ) for equal- flanged I sec tions [5.3.2.4]
fy
b f 250
L/ r y (1800 + 1500 m ) for rect . hollow sections [5.3.2.4]
bw f y
(Note that any lateral restraints must be attached to the critical flange [5.3.2.3]).
Alternatively, if you are lazy, or do not yet know the BMD, you can conservatively
take as -1.0.
If there is "transverse" load acting within the length of the subsection under
consideration, then must be taken as -0.8.
(Note that "transverse" means in AS4100 "at right angles to the longitudinal
axis" i.e. for a beam: vertical load as well as horizontal).
If a beam supports a concrete floor sitting on the critical flange, or firmly attached to it,
the floor prevents lateral movement of the flange. This is called in AS4100 a
"continuously restrained segment". If both ends of the segment are "fully" or "partially"
restrained cross-sections, then Mb> Ms.
In all cases, the members providing restraint must be designed for specified strength
and stiffness, but this is left for advanced design subjects.
9.1 The web of a steel beam does most of the work in resisting the shear
force. We draw shear force diagrams so that we can pick out the
maximum SF and the value of SF at points where special problems
might occur (e.g. where there are holes for duct work).
As long as a plate subjected to shear does not buckle or yield, the stress (neglecting
residual stresses) is given by the formula developed in CIV2204.
VA y
=
Ib
The formula is inaccurate for vertical shear stress in the flanges, but these do little work
in resisting vertical shear force.
When the max. reaches the yield stress in shear y = f y / 3 , plastic yielding
commences and if the load is further increased, the entire web becomes plastic.
V = (t. y)
V = o t. dy = t x (Area of diagram)
y
fy
The plastic yield strength = Aw 0.58 Aw f y
3
If the only holes in the web are those required for fasteners, and the fasteners are in
place Aw = gross area of the web. For rolled sections this is assumed to be (overall
depth) d x tw. For welded I-sections it is taken as dw x tw.
If there are larger holes (e.g. for conduits, pipes, air-conditioning ducts) the net area
must be used, if it is less than 90% of the gross area.
Vw = 0.36 fyAe
where Ae is the net cross-sectional area. Ae may be taken as the gross area if all holes
are for fasteners, or if Ae 0.9 Ag.
If the elastic shear stress distribution (before yield) is reasonably uniform we can be
confident that the full yield stress will be reached throughout before failure, as long as
the web does not buckle.
As usual there are two approaches to buckling. One is to make the web so stocky
that it will not buckle before it reaches its full yield capacity. The other is to accept
buckling, and to calculate the reduced capacity of the web. Sometimes it is
economical to control the buckling by dividing the web into panels with vertical and/or
horizontal stiffener plates to increase its buckling strength. Stiffeners are costly in
terms of labour, and are much less common than they once were.
For design of unstiffened slender webs the buckling strength in shear is taken as the
elastic buckling strength. We do not calculate the plastic buckling strength which is
slightly higher.
The theory of plate buckling is developed for a "panel" of length lp and depth dp in a
stiffened web. This may be extended to cover the case of an unstiffened web by
putting lp >> dp.
E
2
k
F ov = .
12(1 - ) d p
2 2
tw
2
d
For lp d p k 5.35 p + 4
lp
2
d
For lp dp k 5.35 + 4 p
lp
5.35 2 E
F ov 2
dp
12(1 - )
2
tw
For a STEEL beam, the shear stress at which elastic buckling occurs is found
by substituting E = 200 000 MPa and = 0.3
979853 Aw
V b = Aw F ov = 2
dp
tw
Note that for box beams it is necessary to calculate Vb separately for each web and
add.
If a web is slender (high value of dp/tw) it will buckle before it reaches its yield strength
Vw. "Stocky" webs, with low dp/tw will yield before they buckle. It is important to
know the value of dp/tw at which the changeover can be expected.
979853 Aw fy
2
< Aw
dp 3
tw
dp fy
> 82
tw 250
dp 82
if
tw fy
250
dp 82
If >
tw fy
250
then Vu = Vb
Note that a new symbol Vu has been introduced for the shear capacity of a web with
approximately uniform shear stress, where Vu is the lesser of Vw and Vb.
In the code, the formula for Vb is re-arranged so that it is expressed in terms of Vw.
f 3
Aw = V w
y
V w = Aw
3 fy
979853 3 V w 3919 3 Vw
V b= =
dp
2
fy d p
2
fy
tw tw 250
2
82
= Vw
dp f y
t w 250
dp 82
Thus when, > for approximately uniform shear stress
tw fy
250
distribution
Vb = v Vw Vw
where
2
82
v= [5.11.5.1]
d p f y
t w 250
For unstiffened webs (which is all we cover in this subject) dp = d1 the clear distance
between the flanges, and lp = (or at least the length of the beam!). All webs for
which stiffener spacing S is greater than 3dp must be treated as "unstiffened", so
although we often have end stiffeners on our beams they cannot be treated as having
"stiffened webs".
For practical reasons the code places an upper limit on the slenderness of
unstiffened webs of:
d1 fy
180 [5.10.1]
tw 250
If the elastic shear stress distribution is not reasonably uniform, due to unequal flanges,
varying web thickness, or large holes Vv must be taken as
2V u
Vv= Vu
f *vm
0.9 + *
f
va
If holes in a beam web exceed certain dimensions (rule 5.10.7) the web must be
stiffened in the vicinity and a proper calculation of stress levels carried out.
The factored capacity Vv = 0.9 Vv must be greater than the design shear force V*
due to the factored loads. That is,
V * Vv
Over the internal supports of continuous beams high BM and high SF co-exist.
The above calculations refer to webs subjected to pure shear. The presence of BM
and/or axial force may reduce shear capacity significantly. The philosophy behind this
will be covered in Level 3. When there is no axial force then:
V * Vv
1.6 M*
V 2.2 -
*
Vv [5.12.3]
M s
dp 82 Vv = Vu = Vw = 0.6fyAw
Uniform tw fy
(e.g. I-sections)
250
dp 82 Vv = Vu = Vb = vVw
>
tw fy = v (0.6fyAw) Vw
250
where
2
82
v =
d p f y
t w 250
2 Vu
Vv = Vu
dp 82 f *vm
0.9 + *
Non-uniform tw fy f va
(e.g. T- and rectangular
250 Vu = 0.6fyAw
sections)
2 Vu
Vv = Vu
f *vm
dp 0.9 + *
82 f va
>
tw fy Vu = Vb = vVw
250 = v (0.6fyAw) Vw
where
2
82
v =
d p f y
t w 250
1.6 *
V * 2.2 - M Vv where Vv is obtained from the table above.
M s