Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Gregory MacRae
1
Many slides from 2009 Myanmar Slides of Profs Jain and Rai
Lateral Loads
Wind Earthquake
Lateral Load Resisting Systems
Vertical Elements
Moment-Resisting Frames
Walls
Bearing walls / Shear Walls / Structural Walls
Gravity Frame + Walls
Dual System (Frame + Wall)
Vertical Truss
Tube System
Bundled-Tube System
Floor/Diaphragm
Foundation various types
Rai, Murty and Jain
Vertical Elements
Building Structures
Structural Systems
Structural Systems
Rai,
Murty
and
Jain
U.S. Buildings, Zones 3 and 4
9
Sudhir K Jain
Lateral Load Resisting Elements
14
Sudhir K Jain
Lateral Load Resisting Elements
Countries CHILE, US, PERU, COLOMBIA, MEXICO
15
Sudhir K Jain
STRUCTURAL FORMS
16
Sudhir K Jain
Moment Resisting Frame
Beams
h
Columns
Joints Ph / 2 Ph / 2
Ph / 2 Ph / 2
17
Sudhir K Jain
Moment Resisting Frame
BMD
19
Sudhir K Jain
Moment Resisting Frame
BMD
0.5Lbeam Lbeam
htop
0.7htop
hmid 0.5hmid
hmid
0.5hmid
hbot
0.7hbot
Example: If the storey shear at the top level is 120kN say, then the shear force on
23
an internal column in 20kN, and on an external column is 40kN.
Moment Resisting Frame
6kN Example:
Top right beam shear is found by
20kN 40kN 40kN 20kN considering a free body. The beam
axial force is first computed from .
horizontal equilibrium as 20kN. Then,
by taking moments about the column
40kN 80kN 80kN 40kN mid-height, the beam shear is
20kNx0.3*3.6m /(0.5x7.2m)= 6kN.
0.5 x 7.2m
20kN
Shears on Different Members 0.3 x 3.6m
6kN
20kN
24
Moment Resisting Frame
6kN 21.6kNm
Example:
20kN 40kN 40kN 20kN The beam moment demand is therefore
0.5 x 7.2m * 6kN = 21.6kNm due to
earthquake loads. This can be
combined with gravity loads for design.
40kN 80kN 80kN 40kN
21.6kNm
0.5 x 7.2m
20kN
Forces on Different Members 0.3 x 3.6m
6kN
20kN
A similar process may be used to obtain all moments, shears and axial forces throughout
25
the frame.
Moment Resisting Frame
27
Sudhir K Jain
Degree of Freedom in 3-D Frame
28
Sudhir K Jain
Moment Resisting Frame
x
Plan of a three-storey building having three two-bay frame in the
y-direction, and by two four-bay frames in the x-direction
29
Sudhir K Jain
Moment Resisting Frame
31
Sudhir K Jain
Walls
32
Sudhir K Jain
Example
Stiffness due to point load at the top
0.15m thick
0.4m
14m
3.6m
0.4m 0.4m
4m
Wall Section
Area = 860,000 mm2
Shear Area = 540,000 mm2 (= 0.15m x 3.6m)
Moment of Inertia = 1.867 1012 mm4
E = 25,500 MPa
33
G = 10,500 MPa Sudhir K Jain/MacRae
Example
3 3
WH W 14000 6
flexure 12
19 .6 10 W mm
3EI 3 25,000 1.867 10
WH W 14000
shear 2.46 10 6 W mm
As G 540,000 10,500
Total Deflection = -6 W mm
flexure + shear = 22.1X10
W
k wall 45,320 N mm 45,320 kN m
22.1 10 6W
34
MacRae/Sudhir K Jain
Rocking of Footing
Footing
Shear wall
4m
8m
Winklers Foundation
M k(x ). 4dx
Sub grade modulus for some soils
k 30,000kN / m3
x
35
Sudhir K Jain
Rocking of Footing
36
Sudhir K Jain
Rocking of Footing
Rotation of footing
14W
2.73 10 6W radians
5.12 106
Wall displacement at roof level
rocking 2.73 10 6 W 14 3.83 10 5W m
Total deflection
It must be considered
total rocking flexure shear
5 8
3.83X 10 W m 2.21X 10 W m
5
3.83X 10 W m
Wall stiffness W
k wall 5
26,110kN / m
3.83X 10 W 37
Sudhir K Jain
Shear Wall with Openings
Issues
Stiffness calculations
Force resultants/stresses
Detailing
Stiffness
beam
Imaginary
beam
Wall beam
Shear panels
Column beam
Analysis Column
Model
I= I=
Column
Ib
39
Sudhir K Jain
Example
Opening
4m 3m 6m
40
Sudhir K Jain
Wall-Frame Systems
1000
400 1000 5 28.25
100 1400 7 23.25
50 1500 7.5 16.25
1550 7.75 7.75
41
Sudhir K Jain
Wall-Frame Systems
How does a wall structure deform?
The deflected shape is
Straight line for point load at top
Approximately a quarter cycle of sine function in case of earthquake
force.
Deformation:
Cantilever beam Frame
(flexural beam; ignoring shear deformation)
::Large inter-storey Zero Slope :: Small inter-storey
displacement displacement
Zero Slope
:: Small inter-storey
displacement Large inter-storey
What happens, if we combine the two? displacement
42
Sudhir K Jain
Wall-Frame Interaction
Extreme 2 ::
Frames too rigid
Walls deform as per frames
43
Sudhir K Jain
Wall-Frame Interaction
Interacting Forces
tension
Combine
compression
44
Sudhir K Jain
Wall-Frame Interaction
2
Shear lag Variation in axial
A Compression Columns B force
in columns
Tension Columns
Plan Force Plan 46
Sudhir K Jain
Horizontal Elements
Precast:
E.g. Post-tensioned
(with topping)
jpcarrara.com
http://www.formstress.co.nz/products/ribtimber.html#construction
Reinforced Concrete Cast-in-Situ Slabs
The slab is subject to horizontal load.
t
b
K K/2 K
51
Sudhir K Jain
In-plane versus out-of-plane deformation of floor
53
Sudhir K Jain
Foundations
See Prashant Presentation
Thank you!!
55