Vous êtes sur la page 1sur 4

ISSN 2319-8885

Vol.04,Issue.33,
August-2015,
Pages:6698-6701
www.ijsetr.com

Ship Hull Structure Analysis in ANSYS


Y. LAKSHMI PRASANNA1, DR. AMAR NAGESWARA RAO2
1
PG Scholar, Dept of MECH, NIMRA Group of Colleges, Jupudi, Vijayawada, AP, India.
2
Associate Professor, Dept of MECH, NIMRA Group of Colleges, Jupudi, Vijayawada, AP, India.

Abstract: The ship, during operation experiences complex loading conditions, which is generally divided into few categories:
Linear Static and Dynamic Loads, Thermal Loads and Complex Non-Linear Dynamic Loads. Generally the loading on the ship is
a combination of some or all of the load categories mentioned above, depending on the type of the ship. This is dedicated to
Modal and Static Analysis. Static Analysis is usually done to find the overall strength of the structure. For this, different load
conditions etc. are also considered. In the domain of Modal Analysis and Static Analysis is done for ship shell to check the
stability of its structure. In this different mode shapes at natural frequencies and at different load conditions the ship structure
deformations and stresses are evaluated.

Keywords: Thermal Loads, Linear Static and Dynamic Loads, Static Analysis, Mechanical Design, Structural Analysis.

I. INTRODUCTION the effect of bending, shear, and axial and torsional


Provision of adequate strength in a ship at a reasonable deformations all together. Thus it is very useful for larger
cost, has always been one of the most challenging task for the Ships with complex structural arrangements and large variety
ship designers. Over the years the classification societies of cargo / ballast loading conditions.
have been providing the necessary standards to ensure the
adequacy of strength against all demands that can be A. About Ship Hull
envisaged during service life of the ship. Earlier, these Hull is known as the foundation of the ship. It withstands
formulations were largely based on experience of good ships extremely harsh climatic and weather conditions. Hull should
and the scantling requirements were given in simple tabular be designed in such a way that it is not affected by the
forms based on few basic parameters like main particulars of different forces that acts on it while the ship is sailing. In this
the ship. Subsequently, from around 1970, there was article we will have a look at different hull designs. The hull
significant change in the class rule formulations, wherein the is one part of the ship that requires extra concern during
requirements were specified by various formulae for design and construction. In the history of naval architecture,
environmental loads and allowable stresses based on simple hull designs have evolved over a period of time, from
principles of structural mechanics. Though these cylindrical wooden shanks to steel columns. Engineers have
formulations were more scientific, the designer did not been continuously innovating hull designs to provide greater
explicitly know the safety margins in the formulation and structural strength. As hull is continuously in contact with
inherent assumptions made, so it was difficult to use such water, it is under the effect of different types of forces acting
formulations for a novel design. In the last two decades there at the same time. Not only that, a hull requires high durability
has been a rapid development in the fields of hydrodynamics and resistance to prevent structural damage in case of
and structural analysis. The advanced methods developed collision or grounding. When considering the load features
now provide a better understanding of environmental loads where the load is transmitted gradually and continuously
(Demand) and strength of ship (Capacity). As these methods from a local structural member to an adjacent bigger
became more and more mature, providing reliable tools for supporting member, the best way to categorize loads on the
structural optimization, it was only logical that they were hull structure is as follows:
incorporated in the classification rules for s Ships and its Longitudinal strength loads
components are generally assessed for Strength and Vibration Transverse strength loads
under normal operation and Strength assessment under Local strength loads
critical loading condition like collision or underwater 1. Sagging, due to a wave with length equal to the ship's
explosion etc. Assessment of strength is now a days based on length, and peaks at the bow and stern and a trough
Direct Strength Analysis which eliminates any error in amidships.
judgment, which may arise out of several assumptions that 2. Hogging, due to a wave with length equal to the ship's
otherwise have to be made regarding the interaction between length, and a peak amidships (right at the middle of the
several structural members. The method takes into account length) as shown in Fig.1.

Copyright @ 2015 IJSETR. All rights reserved.


Y. LAKSHMI PRASANNA, DR. AMAR NAGESWARA RAO

(b)
Fig.3. (a) & (b) Pro-E model of Ship hull.

III. ANALYSIS
Fig.1. Sagging & Hogging of hull due to loading. ANSYS is general-purpose finite element analysis (FEA)
software package. Finite Element Analysis is a numerical
II. MODELING OF CONVEYOR BELT DRUM method of deconstructing a complex system into very small
The sketch shows the principal dimensions of the cargo pieces(of user-designated size) called elements. The software
ship as shown in Fig.2. The length can be overall length Implements equations that govern the behavior of these
(LOA) and length between the perpendiculars (LOP). The elements and solves them all; creating a comprehensive
depth (D) is measured from keel to the upper continuous explanation of how the system acts as a whole. These results
deck. The draft (d) is measured from keel to the water line of then can be presented in tabulated or graphical forms.
loaded ship. The beam (W) is the width of the ship as shown
in Fig.3. The front of the ship is the bows, the rear part is A. Modal Analysis
stern. A modal analysis is typically used to determine the
LOA = 4 ft vibration characteristics (natural frequencies and mode
shapes) of a structure or a machine component while it is
LBP=436. ft being designed. It can also serve as a starting point for
another, more detailed, dynamic analysis, such as a harmonic
W=62ft response or full transient dynamic analysis. Modal analyses,
while being one of the most basic dynamic analysis types
D=38ft
available in ANSYS, can also be more computationally time
d=28ft consuming than a typical static analysis. A reduced solver,
utilizing automatically or manually selected master degrees
of freedom is used to drastically reduce the problem size and
solution time.

B. Static Analysis
Used to determine displacements, stresses, etc. under static
loading conditions. ANSYS can compute both linear and
nonlinear static analyses. Nonlinearities can include
plasticity, stress stiffening, large deflection, large strain,
hyper elasticity, contact surfaces, and creep.

Fig.2. principal dimensions of the cargo ship. IV. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Results of this paper is as shown in Figs.4 and 5.
A. Modal Analysis
Mode Shapes:

(a) (a)
International Journal of Scientific Engineering and Technology Research
Volume.04, IssueNo.33, August-2015, Pages: 6698--6701
Ship Hull Structure Analysis in ANSYS

(b)
(c)

(c)
Fig.4. (a) Mode 1 (b) Mode 2 (c) Mode 3.
(d)
B. Structural Analysis

(a) (e)

(f)
Fig.5. (a) Mode 1 (b) Mode 2 (c) Mode 3. (d) Mode 4 (e)
(b)
Mode 5 (f) Mode 6.

International Journal of Scientific Engineering and Technology Research


Volume.04, IssueNo.33, August-2015, Pages: 6698-6701
Y. LAKSHMI PRASANNA, DR. AMAR NAGESWARA RAO
TABLE I: Results of Modal Analysis [11]Ultimate Strength of Ship Hulls Under Combined
Vertical, Horizontal Bending and Shearing Forces, By J. K.
Paik, A. K. Thayamballi, J. S. Che, Presentation at SNAME
transactions vol.104 1996.

TABLE II: Results of Structural Analysis

V. CONCLUSION
In this study the ship hull structure different mode shapes
at natural frequencies are analyzed with modal analysis.
Different stress parameters like equivalent stress, normal
stress, principal stress, shear stress, total deformation and life
of ship hull structures are analyzed in structural analysis by
using Pro-E and Ansys15 soft wares. The present data can
provide useful design parameters for the improvement of
designs and helpful for architects designing ship structures.
Advance methods developed in the field of hydrodynamics
and structural analyses have become more reliable and faster.
Thus it is now possible to routinely investigate many issues
connected with both demand and capacity directly for each
specific ship. The application of varied types of loads and
boundary condition is also simple. Automation of process,
with the use of ANSYS workbench has helped in increasing
the scope of such investigation to a large number of operating
conditions explicitly at the design stage so that the ships are
more fit for purpose than ever before.

VI. REFERENCES
[1]Vibration analysis and Structural system by Prof. M.
Mukhopadhyay Dept. of OENA IIT Kharagpur.
[2]Hydro elasticity of ships by R E D Bishop and W G
Price.
[3]Development unit note no. 30 examples of ship vibration
analysis by Lloyds Register of shipping.
[4]PRO-E & ANSYS 15.0 Manuals.
[5]Vorus, William S., Principles of Naval Architecture,
Chapter 7 vibration, Published by, The Society of Naval
Architects and Marine Engineers, 1988.
[6]Vibration Control in Ships, Published by Veritec, Hovik
Norway, 1985.
[7]IACS - Common Structural rules for Bulk Carriers 2006.
[8]Ultimate Limit State Design of Ships Hulls, By J. K. Paik,
Ge. Wang, B. J. Kim, A. K. Thayamballi.
[9]Guidance for Ultimate Hull Girder Strength Assessment,
By Korean Register of Shipping Sept. 2003.
[10]Estimation of Ultimate Longitudinal Bending Moment of
Ships and Box Girder, By M. K. Rahman and M.Chowdhury,
Journal of Ship Research vol. 40 No.3 Sept. 1996.
International Journal of Scientific Engineering and Technology Research
Volume.04, IssueNo.33, August-2015, Pages: 6698--6701

Vous aimerez peut-être aussi