0 Votes +0 Votes -

0 vues10 pages,,,,

Mar 18, 2017

© © All Rights Reserved

PDF, TXT ou lisez en ligne sur Scribd

,,,,

© All Rights Reserved

0 vues

,,,,

© All Rights Reserved

- Thermal Ice Storage - Small
- TECS Water Cooled Chiller
- Dynamic Real-Time Optimization
- DAIKIN ECPEN12-430_tcm629-229531
- turbinas a gas
- GEA Heat Exchangers
- 5_35 C
- 20 Chiller Systems
- Nonlinear Mpc Based on Multi-model for Distillation Columns
- South-Carolina-ElectricandGas-Co-HVAC-Chillers-Incentives
- AllVariableWaterCooledChillerPlant
- Start Up Checklist
- Water Cooled Chiller ( SHUBAILY GRAND MALL )
- 5. ECI Heat Pump and Chiller Setting
- High Capacity Chiller Systems
- 090102b181d1edef
- 30rb-19pd
- buildings-08-00029-v2
- CN4227R - Course Outline - 2017
- Tagore Theatre

Vous êtes sur la page 1sur 10

journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/enbuild

energy productionconsumption system applied to a TRNSYS solar

absorption cooling system for thermal comfort in buildings

Eunice Herrera, Romain Bourdais , Herv Guguen

CentraleSupelec - IETR, Avenue de la Boulaie - CS 47601, F-35576 Cesson-Svign Cedex, France

a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t

Article history: The aim of this paper is to propose a control approach for the management of a productionconsumption

Received 10 April 2015 energy system based on model predictive control (MPC). The solar absorption cooling system is seen as

Received in revised form 12 June 2015 part of this productionconsumption energy system where the solar hot water storage (SHWS) system

Accepted 23 June 2015

is the producer subsystem and the chiller-building system is one of the consumer subsystems. In order

Available online 9 July 2015

to provide modularity to the control structure, the coordination between the subsystems is achieved

by designing interactive local predictive controllers. The consumer controllers compute a set of energy

Keywords:

demand proles sent to the producer controller which selects the prole that better minimizes the global

Absorption cooling system

Model predictive control

optimization cost function. In a rst part, the proposed control approach is tested on a simplied linear

Interactive controllers model composed of one producer and several consumers. In a second part, a more complex case is studied.

Hybrid systems A simplied model of an absorption cooling system is evaluated using the simulation tool TRNSYS. The

producer model is no longer linear, instead it is described by a nonlinear hybrid model which increases

the complexity of the optimization problem. The simulations results show that the performance of the

controller fullls the control objectives.

2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

absorption cooling systems are an alternative to reduce the elec-

Thermal comfort is that condition of mind which expresses sat- tricity consumption as they are driven by free-cost energy, waste

isfaction with the thermal environment [1]. Maintaining thermal heat or solar energy. Furthermore, solar-powered absorption cycles

comfort in buildings is necessary since upon this depends several are particularly attractive because of the near coincidence of peak

factors like occupants productivity and health. One of the main pur- cooling loads with the available solar power [5].

poses of an air-conditioning system is then to provide and maintain As the COP of solar absorption cooling systems is typically low

an articial and comfortable environment for the occupants within compared to vapor-compression based cooling systems, a proper

a building or an enclosed premise[2,3]. At the same time, ensuring management of the system is crucial in order to maximize the use

thermal comfort involves energy consumption. Designed strate- of the cost-free driving sources and the minimization of electric-

gies to maintain desired thermal conditions must have a proper ity or gas which are generally used as auxiliary sources. Besides

management in order to minimize the energy use. A well-designed an adequate study about the sizing of the components [610], a

building should be able to provide good thermal comfort, while proper control of the system which is characterized by a strong

simultaneously having low energy consumption [4]. weather inuence, hybrid nature and nonlinear dynamics is nec-

For several decades now, the vapor-compression cycle based essary. Advanced control strategies as MPC have been investigated

cooling system has been the most widely used for thermal comfort to tackle this problem [1113], nevertheless a coordination mech-

control in both residential and commercial buildings. Neverthe- anism must be considered between the different elements of the

less, as nowadays electricity consumption and global warming system (hot water production, cooling production and consump-

are worldwide major concerns, other forms of cooling production tion) as presented by various studies [1417].

In this paper, the global optimization problem is tackled using

a decentralized structure, in which a controller is dedicated to

Corresponding author. manage the energy producer part and one controller is dedicated

E-mail address: romain.bourdais@centralesupelec.fr (R. Bourdais). for each energy consumer. These controllers interact so that the

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2015.06.076

0378-7788/ 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

48 E. Herrera et al. / Energy and Buildings 104 (2015) 4756

Nomenclature (i)

U2 ith consumer subsystem controlled variables vector

b number of energy proles sent to the producer [] []

D1 uncontrolled input vector of the producer system V occupancy vector during the simulation []

[] X1 state vector of the producer subsystem []

(i) (i)

D2 uncontrolled input vector of the ith consumer sys- X2 state vector of the ith consumer subsystem []

tem [] W12 interacting variable from the producer to the con-

gmax maximum value of the g variable [] sumer []

gmin minimum value of the g variable [] W21 interacting variable from the consumers to the pro-

IT total radiation on collector tilted surface [kW m2 ] ducer []

(i)

ITs total radiation on buildings wall oriented to the W21 interacting variable from the consumer i to the pro-

south [kW m2 ] ducer []

J2 set of b consumer optimization costs [] Y2

(i)

output vector (Indoor temperature) of the ith con-

J1 producer subsystem optimization cost [] sumer subsystem [ C]

(i) (i)

J2 ith consumer subsystem optimization cost [] Yr indoor temperature set-point of the ith consumer

JG global optimization cost [] subsystem [ C]

Jg calculated optimization cost using b proles [] x average of vector x []

opt

Jg calculated optimization cost of the centralized case

x(k) state vector over the prediction horizon Nh []

[] occupancy prole []

Jt set of chiller-building optimization costs [] set of consumers energy demand proles []

Jt,h one element of the set Jt [] h one element of the set []

m number of consumers [] switching mode []

max(x) maximum value of vector x [] sd standard deviation []

m 1, m 2 uid mass ow rates in the tank-chiller loop [kg h1 ] %subopt suboptimality percentage []

mch uid mass ow rate in the chiller evaporator circuit

[kg h1 ]

mh uid mass ow rate of the heat exchanger-tank loop resulting solution is close to the original optimization problem but

[kg h1 ] avoiding its complexity. The proposed methodology is generic but

ml uid mass ow rate in the chiller generator circuit it is illustrated on an example in which the energy producer is

[kg h1 ] the solar hot water storage (SHWS) system and one of the energy

ms uid mass ow rate of the heat exchanger-collector consumers is the absorption chiller which provides cooling to a

loop [kg h1 ] building.

(i) (i) (i)

Q1 , Q2 , Q3 weighting factors in the optimization cost This paper is organized as follows: Section 2 introduces the

(i)

function J2 , [] energy productionconsumption system modeling. Afterwards,

Q aux rate of energy input by the heating element [kW] the proposed MPC strategy is formulated in Section 3. In Section 4,

Q s rate of energy input by the solar power system [kW] the performance of the control strategy is rst evaluated by several

T1 , T2 , T3 temperatures in the different levels of the stratied quantitative studies using a simplied linear case of the energy

storage tank [ C] productionconsumption system. In order to evaluate the perfor-

Tchr temperature of the uid entering in the chiller from mance of the proposed control strategy using a more complex test

the building [ C] case, an abstract model of a solar absorption cooling system for

Tchs temperature of the uid sent into the building from thermal comfort control in buildings developed in the thermal sim-

the chiller [ C] ulation tool TRNSYS [18] is studied. The conclusions of this study

Text exterior temperature [ C] are provided in Section 6.

Th temperature of the uid entering the storage tank

from the solar source [ C] 2. The productionconsumption system

Ti temperature of the uid entering the collector from

the heat exchanger [ C] The productionconsumption system is composed of one pro-

Tl outlet water temperature of the chiller generator ducer and m consumers. The producer is a representation of the

[ C] SHWS system which control inputs U1 (k) are the water ow rates

To mixing valve outlet temperature [ C] in the circulation pumps and the auxiliary energy (which can

Top building operative temperature [ C] be continuously controlled). The producer has a nonlinear hybrid

Ts collector outlet temperature [ C] dynamics. The nonlinear characteristic is due to the dependency

Tset set-point temperature demanded by the chiller gen- between temperature and water ow rates circulating in the stor-

erator circuit [ C] age tank and the hybrid one is introduced by the tank operating

Tsbg set-point building operative temperature [ C] modes. Indeed, the hybrid behavior depends on the direction of

Twbp water boiling point temperature [ C] the water entering and leaving the tank.

U1 vector composed of the state and inputs of the pro- The energy producer S1 is described by a hybrid nonlinear dis-

ducer system [] crete model of the form

(i)

U 2 vector composed of the state and inputs of the ith X1 (k + 1) = f1(k) (U 1 (k), W21 (k)) (1)

consumer system []

2(i)

U set of b proles sent to the producer controller [] (k) = (U 1 (k), W21 (k)) (2)

U1 producer subsystem controlled variables vector [] where U 1 (k) = [X1 (k), U1 (k), D1 (k)]. The state vector of the system

is X1 (k) Rn1 . U1 (k) Rm1 is the vector of controlled variables and

D1 (k) Rp1 is the vector of non-controlled inputs. W21 (k) Rq1 is

E. Herrera et al. / Energy and Buildings 104 (2015) 4756 49

resents the switching mode that depends on the state, on the

controlled variables and uncontrolled variables. The number of

modes is nite. The producer S1 is subject to output and input

constraints given by

the producer on the consumers is given by

continuous control inputs subject to nonlinear constraints that

depend on hybrid conditions.

The m consumers are composed of the chiller and the condi-

tioned space. The cooling water is circulated towards the building

(i)

using a radiant ceiling. The i consumer S2 is represented by

(i) (i) (i)

X2 (k + 1) = f2 (U 2 (k), W12 (k)) (5)

(i) (i) (i)

Y2 (k) = h2 (U 2 (k), W12 (k)) (6)

(i) (i) (i)

W21 (k) = g2 (U 2 (k), W12 (k)) (7)

Fig. 1. Structure of an energy producer-consumer system.

(i) (i) (i) (i)

where U 2 (k) = [X2 (k), U2 (k), D2 (k)]. At the same time, the ith

(i)

consumer is subject to output and input constraints as follows where k1 , k1 and 1 are constants. X2 (k) Rn2 is the state vector.

(i)

(i) (i) U2 (k) 0, 1 is the binary control variable and D2 (k) Rp2 is the

H2 (U 2 (k), W12 (k)) 0 (8)

(i)

vector of non-controlled inputs. Y2 (k) Rr2 is the output vector.

The inuence of the consumers on the producer is given by the (i)

The ith consumer S2 is subject input and output constraints

following relation:

given by

m

(i)

(i) (i)

Y2 min (k) Y2 (k) Y2 max (k)

(i)

(13)

W21 (k) = W21 (k) (9)

i=1 (i)

U2 (k) 0, 1 (14)

From the productionconsumption system description, it can Then, the ith consumer S2 is a hybrid system due to the discrete

be seen that strong interactions exist between the subsystems. In nature of its control input.

order to decrease the complexity of the control structure, a sim-

plication of these interactions is done from a control point of

3. MPC problem formulation

view. That is, the inuence of the producer on the m consumers

is not considered in the control model. Instead, a constraint is

In this section, the model predictive control strategy for the

added to the production system: the hot water must be delivered

productionconsumption system is presented. The aim of this

to the consumers at constant ow rate and temperature. Fig. 1

approach is to guarantee the thermal comfort in the condi-

depicts the simplied structure of the productionconsumption

tioned space by fullling the producer and consumer constraints.

system. Another simplication is done, the chiller operates at nom-

The global control problem is solved using predictive controllers

inal capacity. Taking into account that the absorption chiller can

associated with each subsystem with an information exchange

be characterized by a fast transient response compared to time

between producer and consumer controllers. Each of these predic-

constants in the order of 0.51 h (e.g. the Rotartica chiller presented

tive controllers is called local controller. First, the global problem

by [19] and [20]) which is the typical time constant for thermal

of energy productionconsumption is dened. Latter, the global

comfort control in buildings, the transient dynamics of the machine

problem is divided solving local optimization problems. To sim-

is not included as part of the consumer model. Instead, a steady- =

plify the notation, given a prediction horizon Nh at step k, x(k)

state abstract model is used to characterize the energy transferred T T T

from the hot water source to the building. As the dynamical model [x(k) , . . ., x(k + Nh 1) ] .

of the absorption chiller is not studied and as a low-level control

of the machine is not designed, it is supposed that the absorp- 3.1. Global optimization problem: a multi-objective criterion

tion chiller operates at nominal capacity. This implies that inlet

temperatures at generator, condenser and evaporator circuits are The producer has two energy sources. The solar energy is con-

controlled at nominal values. Consequently, the only degree of sidered as a disturbance since it is an external input that cannot be

freedom is the switch on/off of the chiller. According to this sim- controlled. The other source is the auxiliary electric energy which

plication, the ith consumer is represented as follows, instead can be controlled. As the electric energy use is translated in

electric power consumption associated to a corresponding cost, it

(i) (i) (i)

X2 (k + 1) = A(i) X2 (k) + B(i) U2 (k) + F (i) D2 (k) (10) is necessary to minimize this energy as much as possible.

As for the consumers, the control objectives are related to the

(i) (i)

Y2 (k) = C (i) X2 (k) (11) energy consumption. Besides, the binary behavior of the control

(i)

(i) (i) (i) (i)

input U2 (k) imposes a restriction on the operating periods of the

W21 (k) = k1 U2 (k)Y2 (k) k2 U2 (k) (12) consumer. That is, during a given lapse of time, it is preferable to

50 E. Herrera et al. / Energy and Buildings 104 (2015) 4756

operate the energy consumer with as low as possible turn on/off to the producer controller. The set of these b solution is dened by

events in order to avoid damages in the subsystem and to improve 2(i) (k):

U

its performance.

Thus, the objective of the ith consumer can be translated into (i)

the optimization cost function as U2,1 (k)

.

..

Nh

(i) (i) (i) (i) d (i) (i) d

U =

2(i) (k) (i)

U2,2 (k) (17)

J2 (U2 (k)) = [Q1 U2 (k + j 1)d + Q2 U2 (k + j 1)d

.

j=1

.

d

.

(i) (i) (i)

+ Q3 (i) (k + j)Y2 (k + j) Yr (k + j)d ] (15) (i)

U2,b (k)

(i) (i) (i)

in which U2 (j) = U2 (j) U2 (j 1) represents the change in the

control input. The occupancy at time k + j is given by the discrete The cost function value of each of these control sequences has

also to be calculated, dening the set

(i) (i) (i) (i)

variable (i) (k) {0, 1}. Q1 , Q2 and Q3 are weighting coefcients. J2 (k):

An empiric tuning of the coefcients has been considered for these

studies. (i)

J2,1 (k)

In order to minimize the complexity of the optimization prob- (i)

lem, it can be seen from Eq. (15) that the consumer constraint J2,2 (k)

(i)

described in Eq. (13) is introduced in the optimization criterion by J2 (k) = (18)

(i) ..

adding a set-point variable Yr (k). The minimization of the differ- .

ence between the consumer output Y2 (k)(i) and the desired output (i)

(i) J2,b (k)

Yr (k) only takes place during the occupancy periods, i.e. (i) (k) is

different from zero.

The global problem of energy productionconsumption can be (i)

Note that J2,1 (k) is the best optimization cost of the local problem

stated as follows i.

m As the important point is to determinate the inuence of the

U (1) (k),

JG (U1 (k), . . ., U (m) (k))

= J1 (U1 (k))

+ (i) (i)

J2 (U2 (k)) (16) consumers on the producer, for each of these best b solution, the

2 2

i=1

interaction variable has to be evaluated:

Taking into account the output and input constraints stated in (i)

W21,1 (k)

Eqs. (3), (8) and (14), the global optimization problem is a mixed

(i)

integer nonlinear one. As the number of consumers m increases, W21,2 (k)

(i)

this kind of optimization problem may not be easy to solve from W21 (k) = (19)

a centralized control point of view. Then, the optimization prob- ..

.

lem is tackled in a straightforward manner: a partitioning approach

(i)

is considered where local controllers are designed for each sub- W21,b (k)

system. The interactions between subsystems is introduced by

proposing several consumption energy proles to the producer 21

(i)

Each consumer controller generates its own set W (k). Group-

which selects the best one according to its objectives but taking into

ing these sets creates a superset, denoted by (k). It represents

account the preferences of the consumers. The proposed control

structure is detailed in the following section. all the possible combinations of the consumers inuence on the

producer and its built from Eq. (9).

is dened as follows:

(k)

3.2. Proposed MPC architecture

In this strategy, the difculty level of solving the global mixed 1 (k)

integer nonlinear problem is decreased by considering a reduced

..

number of integer possibilities. A model predictive controller is .

developed for the producer S1 which solves an optimization accord- (k) =

h (k)

(20)

ing to the information sent by the m consumer controllers which

solve an integer optimization. ..

.

3.2.1. Consumer optimization problem

bm (k)

According to the optimization cost function described in Eq.

(15), the optimization problem for each of the m consumers can is the hth element of (k).

in which h (k) This matrix contains bm

be written. elements. As an illustrative example, let us consider the case with

Optimization problem. At a time k and given the prediction hori- m = 2 and b = 2.

(i)

zon Nh , the current state of the system X2 (k), the previous control

(i)

input U2 (k 1) and the prediction of the uncontrolled variables

1 (k)

(1)

W21,1 (k)

(2)

+ W21,1 (k)

(i)

(1)

D (k), the problem for the consumer predictive controller is to nd

2

2 (k)

W21,1 (k)

+ W (2) (k)

= =

(i) (i) 21,2

the best b solutions that minimize J2 (U2 (k)). (k) (21)

(1) (2)

(i)

As U2 (k + j 1) {0, 1}, this is a discrete optimization problem. 3 (k) W21,2 (k) + W21,1 (k)

The objective of this controller is to nd not only the best solution (1) (2)

4 (k) +W

W21,2 (k)

(k)

but also the best b solutions in order to offer a degree of freedom 21,2

E. Herrera et al. / Energy and Buildings 104 (2015) 4756 51

of energy demands (k).

3. Given the set of bm linear optimizations, the energy producer

controller selects the one that has the lowest cost (described by

Eq. (23)). The energy demand prole h (k) selected associated

with the producer optimization lower cost is identied.

4. The producer controller sends the rst element U1 (k) of the

control signal vector to the producer and communicates to the

energy consumer controllers the energy demand prole h (k)

that has been selected. The consumer controllers send the rst

(i)

element U2 (k) of the control signal vectors associated with the

selected energy demand prole h (k).

5. The algorithm restarts at the sampling time k + 1.

Fig. 2. Global control architecture. In the proposed control strategy, each of the consumer con-

trollers carries out an integer optimization which computes b

energy demand proles sent to the producer controller. For exam-

On the same way, the set of consumer optimization costs Jt (k) is ple, by considering m = 3 consumers which propose b = 3 energy

built. Each of the bm elements is the sum of the local optimization demand proles over a prediction horizon Nh = 8, the number of

costs of each consumer. For the same example as before, we have: optimizations performed by the producer controller is bm = 27.

(1) (2)

In a centralized approach, this number increases exponentially

Jt,1 (k) J2,1 (k) + J2,1 (k) to 2(mNh ) = 1.7 107 . To better explain this, consider the scenario

(1)

Jt,2 (k) J2,1 (k) + J2,2 (k)

(2) depicted in Fig. 3 where the number of consumers is m = 2 and each

Jt (k) =

J (k) = (22) of them proposes b = 3 energy demand proles over a prediction

t,3 J2,2 (k) + J2,1 (k)

(1) (2) horizon of Nh = 2. If a centralized optimization is used, the num-

ber of integer combinations is 2(mNh ) = 16. That is, 16 optimizations

Jt,4 (k) (1) (2)

J2,2 (k) + J2,2 (k) are performed by the producer controller. Instead, the proposed

control strategy only considers a given number b of combinations

which generates a reduced eld of possibilities, in this case, the

3.2.2. Producer optimization problem

number is bm = 9. It can be noticed that the combinations c1 c4 , c6 ,

The optimization problem for the producer can be stated as

c10 and c14 are not evaluated which may lead to a suboptimality in

follows:

the solution.

Optimization problem. At a time k and given the prediction hori-

zon Nh , the current state of the system X1 (k), the prediction of the

uncontrolled variables D1 (k) and the set of energy demand pro-

les (k) where each element of the set h (k) has an associated 4. Case study 1: A simplied linear case

optimization cost Jt,h (k), the optimization problem for the energy

producer predictive controller is given by 4.1. System description

h (k))

min J1 (U1 (k), + Jt,h (k) (23) The objective of this study is to evaluate the perfor-

U1 (k),h

mance of the proposed control approach applied to the energy

productionconsumption system described in Section 2. As the

subject to:

control problem is solved from a decentralized point of view, the

0

H1(k) (U 1 (k), h (k)) (24) solution obtained is suboptimal. Then, suboptimality studies are

required in order to compare the results of the proposed strategy

m

h {1, 2, . . ., b } (25) with the centralized case. Nevertheless, solving a nonlinear opti-

mization problem is very hard, and can also induce suboptimality.

The producer controller has to nd the optimal cost In order to only study the suboptimality of the method, we consider

h (k))

J1 (U1 (k), and has to select the best energy demand prole

a simple linear model, by simplifying the producer model, for which

among the bm available proles, taking into account its cor-

h (k) any linear solver can determinate exactly the optimal solution. This

responding optimization cost Jt,h (k)in the cost function. model is described as follows:

3.2.3. Control strategy algorithm X1 (k + 1) = A1 X1 (k) + (D1 (k) + B1 (U1 (k) W21 (k))) (26)

Fig. 2 displays the architecture of the proposed control strategy.

A detailed description of the algorithm is given below. m (i)

where W21 = W (k). Then, the producer is represented by a

i=1 21

(i)

solar and electric energy storage linear system. Considering that

1. Given the consumer state vectors X2 (k)i=1,...,m , the previous the consumers are also described by linear models as in Equations

(i)

control inputs 1)i=1,...,m , and the prediction of the dis-

U2 (k (10) and (11), the global optimization problem is a mixed integer

turbances D2 (k) over the prediction horizon Nh , the energy linear problem. This model simplication allows the assessment

consumer controllers compute the superset (k) of bm energy of the control strategy ensuring that the optimal solution can be

demands over the prediction horizon Nh as well as the associate found. The MATLAB function linprog is used for the resolution of

costs Jt (k). the producer optimization problem and a modied version of the

2. Given the producer state vector X1 (k), the set (k) provided by branch and bound-based algorithm [21] is developed for the con-

the energy consumer controllers and the prediction of the distur- sumers optimization problem resolution. This algorithm computes

bances D1 (k) over the prediction horizon Nh , the energy producer a set of optimal solutions which are sent to the producer controller.

52 E. Herrera et al. / Energy and Buildings 104 (2015) 4756

energy demand proles b

4.2.1. Data generation Each consumer controller determinates b optimal solutions. It

As one the objective of the simplied model is to understand could be interesting to compare the behavior when the solutions

the behavior of the proposed control scheme and to evaluate the are all not optimal but when some are chosen randomly. Fig. 5

induced suboptimality, we proposed not to evaluate on completely depicts the suboptimality percentage of the proposed control strat-

random initial states but to use initial states more close to reality. egy considering b = 5 energy demand proles that come from:

In this context, the states that are considered as initial states in the

N = 144 optimization problems for statistical study, are recorded Optimal proles: This criterion of energy demand prole gener-

from a consistent open trajectory of the global system. ation is the one that has been considered so far. The black lines

represent the mean x and standard deviation sd of suboptimality

4.2.2. Test 1: Suboptimality percentage vs. number of energy percentage considering that the set of b energy demand proles

proles b sent by the ith consumer controller corresponds to the optimal

The difference between the results obtained using a lower num- solutions.

ber of energy demand proles and the centralized control case is Partially optimal proles: The blue lines are related to a par-

quantied by the suboptimality percentage given by tially optimal set of energy demand proles. This set is generated

(opt)

Jg (k) Jg (k) selecting 5 of the b = 10 optimal energy proles calculated by the

%subopt (k) = 100% (27) branch and bound-based algorithm. The rst two energy proles

(opt)

Jg (k) are the ones that have the lower optimization cost. The next three

where, proles are randomly selected from the eight remaining proles

of the set.

Jg (k) = J1 (U1 (k), h (k)) + Jt,h (k) (28) Random proles: The magenta lines are related to a random set of

The variable Jg (k) is the computed optimization cost which has energy demand proles without optimization. That is, with Nh = 5,

been obtained using a lower number of energy proles than the the ith consumer controller randomly selects b = 5 combinations

centralized case (when all the integer combinations are evaluated).

(opt)

The variable Jg (k) is the computed optimization cost which has

been obtained considering all possible integer combinations, that % optimization suboptimality

12

is, the optimal case.

10

The following indexes are introduced

1 N

8

mean x

N k=1

1 N

4

2

sd = (%subopt (k) x ) (30) 2

N1 k=1

0

Fig. 4 depicts the results calculated by the indexes when the 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35

number of profiles b

number of energy proles varies from b = 1 up to b = 32. Each cir-

cle of the blue, magenta and black curves of Fig. 4 represents the

25

mean x and standard deviation sd of the suboptimality percent-

Standard deviation sd

age %subopt (k) respectively. For example, the rst circle of the blue 20

curve corresponds to the mean of the suboptimality percentage

calculated from the comparison between the optimal case b = 32. 15

timality percentage from b = 1 up to b = 5. For example, the standard

deviation and mean considering one energy demand prole b = 1 5

mality percentage for the mean and standard deviation are 4.5% 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35

number of profiles b

and 10.8% respectively, which decreases as the number of energy

demand proles b increases. Fig. 4. Suboptimality percentage considering b = 1 up to b = 32.

E. Herrera et al. / Energy and Buildings 104 (2015) 4756 53

% optimization suboptimality storage system composed of solar collector, heat exchanger and

storage tank, the prediction model becomes nonlinear and hybrid.

15

optimal profiles

This entails the growth of the optimization complexity. In order not

partially optimal profiles to add further complexity to the global optimization problem, the

mean x

10 0.1*random profiles solar cooling installation studied here only considers one consumer

composed of an absorption chiller and a building.

5

0

1 1.5 2 2.5 3

Fig. 6 depicts a solar absorption cooling system which is divided

into two parts: the energy producer and the energy consumer. The

30

producer corresponds to the SHWS system which is composed of a

Standard deviation sd

20 models for both collector panel and heat exchanger are used as the

transient response of these elements is considered negligible com-

15

pared to the working sampling time (0.5 h) of the building model.

10 The consumer is composed of a building and an absorption chiller.

5 The model of the solar absorption cooling system is based on

0 physical considerations for each subsystem and most of them are

1 1.5 2 2.5 3 inspired by the TRNSYS documentation [18]. A global model of the

producer is obtained from the collector panel, heat exchanger and

Fig. 5. Suboptimality percentage considering b = 5 and different energy demand

prole generation.

storage tank models. The resulting global model is a hybrid non-

linear system. Further information about the producer prediction

model can be found in the study presented by [22]. According to the

from the 2Nh = 32 possibilities, it calculates its corresponding opti-

generalized model presented in section, the state vector, the vec-

mization cost and sends these sets to the producer controller.

tor of controlled variables, the disturbances vector and the vector

of interacting variables for the SHWS system are dened as follows

From Fig. 5 it can be noticed that there is an obvious difference

between the results considering optimal/partially optimal proles

X1 (k) = [T1 (k), T2 (k), T3 (k)] (31)

and the ones obtained by considering random proles which have

a mean x = 147% and standard deviation sd = 274% of subopti- U1 (k) = [m h (k), Q aux (k)]

s (k), m (32)

mality. Even if there is a minimal difference compared with the

optimal proles, considering partially optimal solutions leads to a D1 (k) = [IT (k), Text (k)] (33)

lower suboptimality percentage but computation complexity must

be taken into account as the prediction horizon size increases. That W21 (k) = [m

l (k), Tl (k)] (34)

is, the generation of partially optimal solutions requires the com-

putation of a bigger number of energy demand proles for the same where the vector X1 (k) represents the storage tank temperatures,

number of proles sent to the producer controller. Consequently, m s (k) and m

h (k) are the water ow rates of the circulation pumps

as the prediction horizon size increases, the optimization problem P1 and P2, Q aux (k) is the auxiliary electric power applied to the

resolution becomes even more complex. very top segment of the tank when the solar power is not strong

enough to rise the temperature T1 (k) to the required value if there

4.2.4. Test 3: Computational time comparison is a cooling demand. The vector D1 (k) represents the weather data

A last study has been provided regarding the computational time and the interacting variable W21 (k) is determined by the inuence

required by this kind of suboptimal strategies. For a prediction hori- of the chiller-building system on the SHWS system.

zon size equal to 8 (Nh = 8), a centralized solution is not reasonably The producer is subject to output constraints which can be

implementable in a close-loop control, but in order to illustrate this expressed in an explicit way as

exponential growth, we also implemented the proposed strategy

with b = 32. Table 1 summarizes the results obtained, which clearly T1 (k), T2 (k), T3 (k), Th (k), Ts (k), Ti (k) Twbp (k) (35)

highlight this exponential explosion.

T1 (k) Tset (k) if m

l (k) > 0 (36)

5. Case study 2: a TRNSYS model of a solar absorption

cooling system for a building Eq. (35) represents the limit temperature constraint of the SHWS

system to ensure safety performance of the system. Then, each tem-

In order to assess the performance of the proposed control strat- perature must remain below the water boiling point limit Twbp (k).

egy on a more complex case, a simplied solar absorption cooling Eq. (36) refers to the minimum required operating temperature at

system for thermal comfort in buildings implemented in the TRN- which T1 (k) must be when there is a chiller energy demand. The

SYS simulation tool is studied. Then, the linear representation of the vector of the SHWS system controlled variables is subject to lower

energy productionconsumption system is no longer adequate for and upper bounds as follows

prediction. As the producer is now represented by a solar hot water

U1 min U1 (k) U1 max (37)

Table 1

Control strategies time comparison.

The consumer prediction model presented in Eqs. (10)(12) is

also used for this case study. It represents the chiller-building sys-

Strategies Mean optimization time (s) tem which is subject to disturbances as the exterior temperature

Proposed algorithm with b = 3 0.85 Text and the solar radiation ITs (k) and to the binary behavior of the

Proposed algorithm with b = 32 755 chiller control input.

54 E. Herrera et al. / Energy and Buildings 104 (2015) 4756

Chiller-building system

5.2. Performance indexes included in the criterion are not only related to energy consumption

but to the constraints fulllment.

In order to assess the performance of the proposed control strat- From top to bottom of Fig. 7, the rst panel shows the storage

egy, the following indexes are introduced. They are calculated a tank temperature T1 (k) evolution (blue curve), its upper and lower

posteriori, after the simulation tests. bounds (red curves), and the chiller water ow rate (black curves).

For the producer controller: The value of the latter curve is modied in order to t in the gure.

The second panel of the gure represents the collector outlet ow

The rst indicator I (measured in kWh) quanties the use of temperature (blue curve) and its upper limit (red curve). The third

U1

and fourth panel are the water ow rate m h (k) in the SHWS system

auxiliary energy U1 (k) over the simulation from the initial time

ti until the nal time tf . The value of this indicator should be as

small as possible. It can be formalized as follows:

120

T (C)

tf

I = U1 (t)dt (38) 100

1

U1

ti 80

0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160

For the consumers: Time(hours)

Two indicators are related to the control input of each consumer. 150

T (C)

of the ith control input over the simulation. It can be dened as 50

s

tf (i)

0

0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160

I (i) = |U2 (k)| (39) Time(hours)

U k=ti

2

m (kg/hr)

500

where the chiller is working of the ith building:

tf

h

(i)

0

I (i) = U2 (k) (40) 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160

U k=ti

2 Time(hours)

Qaux (kW)

the ith building operative temperature deviation from the corre- 10

sponding set-point during occupancy proles: 0

1 tf (i) (i)

0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160

I (i) = (i) (k)|Y2 (k) Yr (k)| (41) Time(hours)

Y

2 V 1 k=ti

30

Top (C)

where V = [(i) (ti ), . . ., (i) (tf )]. It is supposed that ||V||1 is different 25

from zero.

20

0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160

5.3. Simulation results Time(hours)

1000

ml (kg/hr)

in the TRNSYS case study. The parameters of the controllers are

0

detailed in Appendix A. The prediction horizon for the SHWS pre- 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160

dictive controller has been set at Nh = 8 (4 h) and a sampling time of Time(hours)

IT (kW/m )

0.5 h. The criterion to select the prediction horizon has been chosen 1.5

2

and anticipation capacity. The objective of the predictive controller 0.5

is to minimize the energy consumption of the system which could 0

0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160

be translated into a linear optimization criterion. However, this has Time(hours)

been chosen in a quadratic form in order to provide more convex-

ity properties to the optimization problem. Furthermore, the terms Fig. 7. MPC strategy considering T1 = 82 C, Top = 27 C and b = 3.

E. Herrera et al. / Energy and Buildings 104 (2015) 4756 55

Table 2 is, when only one energy prole is sent to the producer controller

Control strategies comparison.

(which is the case of the MPC-LRBC strategy), a larger number of

MPC-LRBC strategy MPC strategy sudden peaks in the ow rate (as the one shown in the rst day of

Fig. 7) occurs. This may imply that by sending more than one energy

T1 = 82 C T1 = 111 C T1 = 82 C T1 = 111 C

Top = 27 C Top = 27 C Top = 27 C Top = 27 C demand prole as in the MPC strategy, an improved solution to the

optimization problem is found from a practical point of view.

IU2 96 96 74 80

IU2 103 103 63.5 65

IY2 1.16 1.15 1.18 1.25

I 68.91 23.04 43.76 14.69 6. Conclusions

U1

IT1 0 0 0.29 0 The present study is dedicated to the development

of a control strategy for the management of an energy

productionconsumption system. The main control challenge

is to achieve an energy balance between production and con-

and the auxiliary electric energy Q aux (k) respectively. The fth panel

sumption parts while maintaining the operating conditions within

of the gure depicts the building temperature Top (k) (blue curve),

the desired reference values. In order to provide modularity and

the occupancy periods (dashed magenta lines) and the temperature

simplicity to the control structure, the management of the energy

set-point (red line). Finally, the last panel shows the solar radiation

productionconsumption system is developed using a partitioning

IT (k).

system approach which allows the design of a decentralized con-

In order to exemplify the strategy, the number of energy demand

trol structure with minimal information exchange. Both producer

proles has been arbitrarily set to b = 3. The initial temperature at

and consumers control design are independent and in order to

the top of the tank is set at T1 = 82 C and the operative temperature

minimize the degradation of the optimal solution, interaction

in the building begins at Top = 27 C. In order to ensure that the tem-

mechanisms are established. Instead of solving a centralized

perature T1 (k) is greater or equal to Tset when the chiller operates,

control approach by exploring all the possibilities of the discrete

the SHWS controller anticipates the need of the auxiliary energy

set, the proposed control strategy only considers a smaller set

Q aux (k). It can be seen that the safety constraints of temperatures

which reduces signicantly the computational burden. Even if

T1 (k) and Ts (k) are respected. The priority of the building predictive

this consideration may lead to a suboptimal solution, quantitative

controller is to maintain as small as possible the difference between

simulation results have demonstrated that, by considering this

the building operative temperature and the set-point Tsbg which is

reduced set, the percentage of suboptimality is not signicant and

set at 25 C. The secondary objectives are the minimization of the

an important computational time is saved. In the proposed control

chiller switch on/off changes and the use of chilled water. These

strategy, the set of energy demand proles sent by each of the con-

changes cannot be signicantly reduced as a further minimization

sumers corresponds, in a rst stage, to its optimal solutions. Other

may degrade the building thermal comfort.

quantitative studies to assess the control strategy performance

Table 2 presents the performance indexes introduced in Sec-

have been done considering different criteria to generate the set.

tion 5.2 for the proposed MPC strategy taking into account two

The results have shown that a minimal suboptimality reduction is

different initial conditions: when the temperature of the tank

achieved by composing the set of energy proles randomly chosen

very top layer are T1 = 82 C and T1 = 111 C. These results are

from a bigger number of optimal solutions. Moreover, this kind of

compared with the MPC-LRBC strategy which is developed in

control architecture is also interesting because the only data that

the study presented by [22]. The objective of this MPC-LRBC

are exchanged between a consumer and the rest of the system are

strategy is to guarantee the constraints fulllment in the SHWS

limited and can preserve in a certain aspect the condentiality on

system while maintaining a straightforward control strategy in the

what is locally done.

chiller-building system. This control structure combines a model

The proposed MPC strategy is applied to a TRNSYS model of a

predictive control strategy for the SHWS system with a logic rule-

simplied solar absorption cooling system. The simulation results

based control (LRBC) strategy for the chiller-building system. That

show that by sending more than one energy demand prole to the

is, there is no on-line optimization for the consumption part but

producer controller, the solver can nd better solutions which may

it is considered that a ow rate prole generator sends the energy

avoid undesirable behaviors as sudden peaks in the collector ow

demand prole to the SHWS system which calculates its local non-

rate. In general, the proposed MPC strategy has a better perfor-

linear optimization as a function of the energy demand prole

the set-point mance compared with the MPC-LRBC strategy, which highlights

received. According to the occupation prole (k),

the interest of using model predictive control.

temperature Tsbg and the current building temperature Top (k), the

consumer controller decides to switch the chiller and pumps on/off.

The sequence of decision is logged to provide the ow rate prole

Appendix A. Model and control parameters

to the SHWS system controller. Two indexes have been aggregated:

the index I Ts (measured in C) quanties the upper limit constraint

The matrices of the building model are:

violation of the collector outlet temperature Ts (k) and I T1 (mea-

sured in C) quanties the lower limit constraint violation of the

tank temperature T1 (k). 0.9907 0.01801 0.050276 0.010807

It can be noticed that the MPC strategy has lower switch on/off 0.015113 0.70914 0.28662

0.21723

A= (A.1)

changes IU2 and lower use of the chiller I U2 . In addition, the index 0.10674 0.50807 0.34083 0.025452

I shows that the MPC strategy has the lower electricity con- 0.033633 0.088119 0.36012 0.87395

U1

sumption and the lower temperature constraint violations. It is

worth noting that the constraints violations of the MPC-LRBC and 3.1104e 05

MPC strategies are related to the difference found between the TRN- 0.00031401

SYS simulation model and the prediction model. The study of the B= (A.2)

0.00057885

two strategies showed that the MPC strategy improved the MPC-

LRBC one in terms of the smooth behavior of the ow rate m h . That 5.3283e 05

56 E. Herrera et al. / Energy and Buildings 104 (2015) 4756

Table A.3 [3] A. Ameen, Refrigeration and Air Conditioning, Prentice-Hall of India, 2006.

Case study 1. MPC parameters. [4] P. Taylor, R. Fuller, M. Luther, Energy use and thermal comfort in a rammed

(i)

earth ofce building, Energy Build. 40 (5) (2008) 793800.

Q1 (k) 2 [5] Z.F. Li, K. Sumathy, Experimental studies on a solar powered air conditioning

(i)

Q2 (k) 0.5 system with partitioned hot water storage tank, Sol. Energy 71 (2001)

(i)

Q3 (k) 5 285297.

(1)

Yr (k) 22

C [6] M. de Guadalfajara, M.A. Lozano, L.M. Serra, Evaluation of the potential of

(2) large solar heating plants in Spain, Energy Procedia 30 (0) (2012) 839848,

Yr (k) 24 C

(3)

1st International Conference on Solar Heating and Cooling for Buildings and

Yr (k) 26 C Industry (SHC 2012).

(i)

m ch (k) 700 kg h1 [7] F. Assilzadeh, S.A. Kalogirou, Y. Ali, K. Sopian, Simulation and optimization of a

LiBr solar absorption cooling system with evacuated tube collectors, Renew.

Energy 30 (8) (2005) 11431159.

Table A.4 [8] C. Monn, S. Alonso, F. Palacn, L. Serra, Monitoring and simulation of an

Case study 2. MPC parameters. existing solar powered absorption cooling system in Zaragoza (Spain), Appl.

Therm. Eng. 31 (2011) 2835.

Nh 8 [9] T. Tsoutsos, E. Aloumpi, Z. Gkouskos, M. Karagiorgas, Design of a solar

Yr 25 C absorption cooling system in a Greek Hospital, Energy Build. 42 (2) (2010)

265272.

Tset 90 C

m h,min 100 kg h1 [10] F. Palacn, C. Monn, S. Alonso, Improvement of an existing solar powered

ITmin 0.1 kW/m2 absorption cooling system by means of dynamic simulation and experimental

m h,max 800 kg h1 diagnosis, Energy 36 (7) (2011) 41094118.

Q aux,max 14 kW [11] T. Prudhomme, D. Gillet, Advanced control strategy of a solar domestic hot

water system with a segmented auxiliary heater, Energy Build. 33 (2001)

463475.

[12] A. Al-Alili, Y. Hwang, R. Radermacher, I. Kubo, Optimization of a solar

0.00010533 1.9279e 05 powered absorption cycle under Abu Dhabis weather conditions, Sol. Energy

0.0013994 0.00015231 84 (12) (2010) 20342040.

F = (A.3) [13] M. Rodrguez, C.D. Prada, F. Capraro, S. Cristea, Logic embedded NMPC of a

0.00031583 0.00043977 solar air conditioning plant, Eur. J. Control 14 (6) (2008) 484500.

[14] P. Menchinelli, A. Bemporad, Hybrid model predictive control of a solar air

0.00085981 8.1885e 05 conditioning plant, Eur. J. Control 14 (6) (2008) 501515.

[15] R. Halvgaard, P. Bacher, B. Perers, E. Andersen, S. Furbo, J.B. Jrgensen, N.K.

C = 104.86 1.9237 2.5191 0.49427 (A.4) Poulsen, H. Madsen, Model predictive control for a smart solar tank based on

weather and consumption forecasts, Energy Procedia 30 (2012) 270278, 1st

The gain vector L of the Luenberger observer that estimates International Conference on Solar Heating and Cooling for Buildings and

the building operative temperature has been calculated using the Industry (SHC 2012).

MATLAB function dlqr which solves the discrete algebraic Ricatti [16] W. Garcia-Gabin, D. Zambrano, E.F. Camacho, Sliding mode predictive control

of a solar air conditioning plant, Control Eng. Pract. 17 (6) (2009) 652663.

equation for linear quadratic regulators. The matrix obtained is [17] D. Zambrano, W. Garcia-Gabin, Hierarchical control of a hybrid solar air

L = [0.0013, 0.4616, 0.0967, 0.0588]T . conditioning plant, Eur. J. Control 14 (6) (2008) 464483.

The parameters of the SHWS system model and controller can [18] TRNSYS17-Documentation, A Transient Simulation Program, Solar Energy

Laboratory, University of Wisconsin, Madison, 2012.

be found in the study presented by [22]. The control parameters of [19] N. Jabbour, Intgration des systmes absorption solaire de petites

the MPC strategy applied to the simplied and TRNSYS cases are puissances aux btiments - approche multifonction solaire: chauffage, ECS et

specied in Tables A.3 and A.4. rafrachissement, INSA de Lyon, 2011.

[20] G. Evola, N.L. Pierrs, F. Boudehenn, P. Papillon, Proposal and validation of a

model for the dynamic simulation of a solar-assisted single-stage LiBr/water

References absorption chiller, Int. J. Refrig. 36 (3) (2013) 10151028.

[21] D. Scholz, Deterministic Global Optimization, vol. 63 Edition, Springer

[1] M. Hall, Materials for Energy Efciency and Thermal Comfort in Buildings, Optimization and Its Applications, Palo Alto, 2012.

Woodhead Publishing Limited, Cambridge, 2010. [22] E. Herrera, R. Bourdais, H. Guguen, Predictive and interactive controllers for

[2] F. Kreith, R. West, CRC Handbook of Energy Efciency, CRC Press, United solar absorption cooling systems in buildings, J. Process Control 24 (6) (2014)

States of America, 1997. 836845.

- Thermal Ice Storage - SmallTransféré parsiva_nagesh_2
- TECS Water Cooled ChillerTransféré parntt_121987
- Dynamic Real-Time OptimizationTransféré parNông Dân
- DAIKIN ECPEN12-430_tcm629-229531Transféré parMuhidin Kozica
- turbinas a gasTransféré parpamelataboadalozano
- GEA Heat ExchangersTransféré parSteven Martin
- 5_35 CTransféré parMaria Cristina Rivero Olarte
- 20 Chiller SystemsTransféré parJoshua Evans
- Nonlinear Mpc Based on Multi-model for Distillation ColumnsTransféré parjoaopaulofcrn
- South-Carolina-ElectricandGas-Co-HVAC-Chillers-IncentivesTransféré parGenability
- AllVariableWaterCooledChillerPlantTransféré par185412
- Start Up ChecklistTransféré parEdward Gitter
- Water Cooled Chiller ( SHUBAILY GRAND MALL )Transféré parkdpmansi
- 5. ECI Heat Pump and Chiller SettingTransféré parBiswanath Lenka
- High Capacity Chiller SystemsTransféré parSyed Noman Ahmed
- 090102b181d1edefTransféré parMike Faulkner
- 30rb-19pdTransféré parHarris Mintz
- buildings-08-00029-v2Transféré paremad
- CN4227R - Course Outline - 2017Transféré parMing Xiang
- Tagore TheatreTransféré parhimaniwatal
- 110-279.pdfTransféré parHoàngViệtAnh
- 15 Ways to Improve Chiller Efficiency3Transféré parJaspreet Singh Arora
- Reference Steam and Cooling CapacitiesTransféré parMohammad Kasanudin
- PLC ,AirConditioning and Mechanical Ventilation ,M&E, Automation စသည့္ Lecture(ကိုေကာင္းထက္ညႊန္႔)Transféré parSaw Ehlor
- Fgas Refrigerant Calculator (1)Transféré parSugu Kumar
- 22-2Transféré parFrancisco M. Ramos
- M&E Works Risk MgmtTransféré parSyaFiq Mansoor
- rfpo-120103003512-phpapp01Transféré parAnonymous pTtEWaa
- Chap 15 Scheduling.pptTransféré parKokWai Lee
- 05 Refrigeration Compressors a Trane Air Conditioning ClinicTransféré parmaddy_sggs

- AU ACST Assignment 2 Fall 2014Transféré parKhuleedShaikh
- AU ACST Assignment 1 Fall 2014Transféré parKhuleedShaikh
- 1-s2.0-S1474667016416770-mainTransféré parKhuleedShaikh
- 1-s2.0-S1877705816310700-mainTransféré parKhuleedShaikh
- Final_version (2) (1).pdfTransféré parKhuleedShaikh
- 1-s2.0-S0360132301000762-mainTransféré parKhuleedShaikh
- 1-s2.0-S0306261915013951-mainTransféré parKhuleedShaikh
- 1-s2.0-S0263224112004678-mainTransféré parKhuleedShaikh
- 39Transféré parKhuleedShaikh
- 38.pdfTransféré parKhuleedShaikh
- 62-116-eSim2016.pdfTransféré parKhuleedShaikh
- JournalPaper2 Published AETransféré parKhuleedShaikh
- 38Transféré parKhuleedShaikh
- 36Transféré parKhuleedShaikh
- 62-116-eSim2016Transféré parKhuleedShaikh
- 34Transféré parKhuleedShaikh
- FX1S PLC Series - Hardware Manual_0900766b80082eecTransféré parGuillermo Hernandez
- Solar Radiation Monitoring SystemTransféré parKhuleedShaikh
- mission.pdfTransféré parKhuleedShaikh
- TRNSYS_2004.pdfTransféré parKhuleedShaikh
- TRNSYS DocumentationTransféré parKhuleedShaikh
- Boiler Automation Using Programmable Logic ControlTransféré parx-robot
- ObjectivesTransféré parKhuleedShaikh
- Concept of God in Major World Religions - Dr. Zakir NaikTransféré parArshad Farooqui
- 5000 Gk Questions Nagaraj N C-1.pdfTransféré parSudar Shan
- MCQS Pak AffairsTransféré parKhuleedShaikh

- Hill Climb Algorithm[1047]Transféré parhetal65
- Wu16PhDTransféré parmayalasan1
- Convexity LectureTransféré parknotty
- architecture syllabusTransféré parsaurav gupta
- M.Tech RAC 2013-14Transféré parJeffy Shannon
- Jean-pierre.moreau.pagesperso-Orange.fr Cplus Steepds CppTransféré parshyam
- MTech Data Science and Engineering.pdfTransféré parAnonymous FqvBZUEdZ
- The economics of large-scale wind power in the UK A model of an optimally mixed CEGB electricity gridTransféré parapi-19808113
- GeophysicsTransféré parXimena Melgarejo
- OWO400010 Introduction to GENEX Nastar ISSUE1.00Transféré parEllis Okpoti
- (1984) Thermally Optimum Spacing of Vertical Natural Convection Cooled Parallel PlatesTransféré parChristian Mavarez
- fang2016(5)Transféré parhendra lam
- Ch02 - Lpilp ModelsTransféré parasma246
- 68-248-1-PBTransféré parabhijeet
- taguchi(kamarudin-jilid18).pdfTransféré parLuis González
- Computational Fea ChassisTransféré paryogesh
- HBV_manual_2005.pdfTransféré parrustantoandry
- UPES Quantitative ManagementTransféré parManjunatha B V
- 07980993Transféré parJeevan G
- Lecture-07 Search TechniquesTransféré parHema Kashyap
- Ch10Transféré parzaroxx
- syllabi_MTech_EE[1].pdfTransféré parSaurabh Kumar
- Multi-objective and multi-criteria optimization for power generation expansion planning with CO2 mitigation in ThailandTransféré parel_ruso__83
- FLOWSHEET OPTIMIZATIONTransféré parPanasheMuduzu
- Mine Rade Da to Spar a Series Temporal EsTransféré parluli_kbrera
- Swarm and Evolutionary Computation_2Transféré parTibin Joseph
- Improving Canned Food Quality With Variable Retort Temperature ProcessesTransféré parDedy Santoso
- AV02-0359ENTransféré parEban Ramírez
- Chapter 7 Supplement 1.pdfTransféré parnigam34
- linear programme-simplex and graphical.pdfTransféré parRayan Rodrigues

## Bien plus que des documents.

Découvrez tout ce que Scribd a à offrir, dont les livres et les livres audio des principaux éditeurs.

Annulez à tout moment.