STEPHENA.

HOUZE
Ar-rc)tsr a, l-rN
l:40 l,i(\'Err CENrER
1 2l l S Y l ILF I A !.rrL
loR i\r, OREco\9::04

.l.tLrt
t()rt ir3 | 2.)t)6426
F,AXi03 / ?99 6428 JltG; (it i Ht.tElgEf,lHEMEe
iJtJLri+3LiAi.
caut\rr}..tRcLliT
ehaii: sephen@sho!ze..om CO{rqT
:ia!-!j-9{-iS3s
l u ly1 2 ,2010

Hon.KeithMeisenheimer Via email and handdelivery

MultnomahCountyCircuit Court lieith.meiserh ejmer@oj(Ls!ale!!!s
1021SWFourthAvenue
Portland,OR97204 !_
'''1 . '
Re: HormanandHorman '! ! i'.. '
Co.
Multnomah Nos.
Case 1006- &
66084 l00b- 66086
lconsoliddted) - .- .]-
:1- : '' "---F

Meisenheimer:

I'm correspondingwith the court at tlis time on behalfofmy client,Respondentin

the above-referencedmatters,with the knowledgeand agreementofMs. Rackner,
who representsthe Petitionerin the above-referenced consolidatedmatters.

I haveadyisedMs.Racknerthat my client,the Respondentwill not be contesting

hearingsetfor July22,2010at 1:30pm'
anymattersto be heardin the scheduled

Accordingly,Ms.Racknerand I are agreedthat there is no further needfor a hearing

beforethe cour! and that the court may strike tIe scheduledproceedingfrom its
calendar.

With respectto the underlyingPETITION FORDISSOLUTI0N OFMARRIAGE, it

remainsRespondent's intentionto seekseparaterepresentationby domesrjc
relationscounsel,who will addressany future schedulingregardingthe dissolution
case,
I

- r!..nl .
1 8j
3

4 IN THE CIRCUITCOURTFORTHE STATEOF ORECON

5 FORTHE COUNTYOF MULTNOMAH

5 ln the Matter of: )

) CaseNo. 1006-66086
7 KAINE ANDREW HORMAN, )
) oRDERTOSHOW
8 Petitioner, ) CAUSERE:REMEDIALCONIEMPT
)
9 and )
)
l0 TERRILYNN MOULTONHORTLAN, )
)
11 Respondent. )

1) TO: TERRI LIT{N MOULTON IIORMAN , - ,.:\u-:\ -,,,.-*

13 Basedupon the Motion ard the Supporting causeappeanng

t4 YOU ARE HEREBY ORDEREDto appearat the MultnomahCounty Courthouse,

l5 locatedat 102i SWFowthAvenue,Portland,Orcgonon a dateandtime to bespecifiedby

16 theCouftandshowcausewhy, if any,thefollowingordersshouldnot be madeby theCourt:

t1 1. in contemptfor the willful violationof theOrderto Restrict

FindingRespondent

18 ta File signed.by
Access order
on J]une28,2Al0|.the
theHonorableKeith Meisenheimer

19 VacatingOrder to Seal FiIeas to OJIN, E -Parte Motion anl Order to RestrictAccessto File

2t on June29,2010;'andtheorder
andOrder signedby theHonorableKeithMeisenheimer

2l AmenlingPrior Orderto RestrictAccessto Frle signedby theHonorableKeith

,,,,
on July 8,2010in thefollowingparticulars:
Meisenheimer

A. gaveanunauthotized
Respondent ancllor
to the documents
party(ies)access

24 informationfiled by Petitionerin the aboveentidedmatterdu ng the time accessto

carec, x{mR arENcrLLLP
Page1 - ORDERTO SHOWCAUSERE:
REMEDIAL CONTEMPT
I the Couftfile wasrestrictedpursuant above'
to theOrdersreferenced

2. Orderingtheimpositionof thefollowitgremedialsanctonsagaiDst for

ResPondent
2

3 the aboveviolations:

4 A. OrdedngRespondent of the name,dateof birth'

to providefull disclosurc

5 addrcss shehasdirecdyprovided
andphonenumberof anyperson(s)

6 documents i nformaton:
aDd/or

7 B. OrderingRespondent of thename,dateof bifih'

to providefull disclosure

8 thatthe person(s)
andphonenumberof anyperson(s)
address in
described

9 Paragraph and/orinformation:
2(A) abovehaveProvidedwith documents

10 C. to complywith thetermsof thejudgmentandimposition

OrderirgRespondent

1l annualgrossincome'
of a fine of $50000 or onepercentof Respondent's

12 continues;
whicheveris greater,for eachdaythecontemPt

D. OrderingRespoldentto comPlywith thetermsof the Ordersandenteringa

I4 Petitionerfor anyloss'
moneyawardin an amountsufEcientto compensate

15 injury, or costssuffetedby Petitionerasthe resultof the contemptand

It) to ensureRespondent's
designed with existingcourtordersi
compliance

E. E teringan orderdesigned \ryiththeorderof the

to insuretimelycompliance

18 on probatlon'or any
Courtiqcluding,but not limitedto placingRespondent

19 otherremedythat the Court determineswould be an effectiveremedyfor the

20 con@mpt;

F. Orderingthe sanctionof coDfinement or

for solongasthecontemptcotrtinues'

six months,\ahicheveris theshorterperiod;

G. OrderingthatRespondent legalfeesandcostsincured in bringing

PayPetitioner's

this motion.
Cl]e6, R{C@i & D.JCELLLP
Page2 - ORDERTO SHOWCAUSERR:
REMEDIAL CONIEMPT TETrcNE (503)22 er16
 at this Pointin
moneyawardsoughtis not determinable
3. Themaximumcompensatory

ume.

thattlreCourtmakespecialfindingsof law andfact to

pursuant
J 4. It is requested

oRcP62.

5 Datedthisladal of

7
by:
Submitted
a

9 AattL,lJ- Barfu'et\
I-iura E. Rackner,OSB#84328
10 Attomeyfol Petitioner

1l IF YOU IIAVE ANY QUESTIONSYOU SHOIJLDSEEAN ATTORNEY

IMMEDIATELY.
Lawer
If youneedhelpin finding an attorneyyou ma-ycal the OregonStateBar's
"
ReferralServiceat (503)584'3763or toll free in Oregonat (800)452'7636'

l4

l5

lo

l8

L9

20
,l

24
c::lm., Ridirn a t^ dEr[P
Page3 - ORDERTO SHOWCAUSERE:
REMEDIAL CONTEMPI tuHoNt(s)?24b
 ifi;-=-*er'
.i*: 1 : ?titi ;'t,
)
In !:ll t, i:...t
ir',:rrEcrslEilf$ I 4'i U

IN THE CIRCUIT COURTFOR TIIE STATE OF OREGON

5 FORTHE COUNTYOF MULTNOMAH

ln the Matter of: )

) CaseNo. 1006-66086
7 KAINE ANDREW HORMAN, )
) MOTIONFORORDERTO SHOW
8 Petitioner, ) CAUSERE:REMEDIALCONTEMPI
)
9 a!d )
)
10 TERRi LYNN MOULTONHORMAN' )
)
11 Respondent. )
E Racknerof
1 '' Petitiotrer,Kaine Andrew Horuan' by and throughhis attorney' Laura
requiring
Gearing,Rackner& Engel,LLP, doesherebymovetheCourtfor an order

Terd Lynn Moulton Horman,to aPpearandshowcausewhy' if any' the

Respondent,

It followingordersshouldnot be madeby theCourt:

Restrict
l. Finding RespondentiII cotrtemPtfor the willful violatiol of the Order to

tu File sigt\ed
Access on Jure 28 '2010' theorder
by theHonorableKeith Meisenheimer
Accessto FiLe
18 Vocatin&Order to SealFite as to OJIN,Er-Parte Motion hnd Order to Restrict
the order
19 and Order sig)edby theHonorableKeith Meisenheimeron June29 'ZO10i^nd

20 to File signedby the HononbleKeith

AmendingPrior Orderto RestrictAccess

on July 8,2010in thefollowingParticularc:

Meisenheimer
and/or
to the documents
Respoldentgaveanumuthorizedparty(ies)access
A.
matterduringthetjme access
informationfiled by Petitionerin theabove-entitled
to

the Courtfile \aasrestrictedpursuantto the Ordersreferencedabove

casc R^c6m A IXce rtP
Pase1 - MOTIONFORORDERTO SHOWCAUSERE:
REMEDIALCONTEMST hFHoNE (s) 2rn6
 for
againstResPondent
I 2. Ordering the impositionof the follo wing remedial sa,ncilons

, the aboveviolations:

3 A. OrderingRespondentto providefull disclosureof the name' dateof bifth'

4 address shehasdirectlyprovided
andphole numberof anyperson(s)

and/orinformation;
documents

6 B. OrderingRespondentto providefull disclosureof the name' dateof birth'

andphonenumberof anype$on(s)thattheperson(s)
address in
described
7

8 ParagBph2(A) abovehaveprcvidedwith documentsand'/orinfomation;

9 C. OrderingRespondentto comply with the termsof thejudgmentandimposition

10 of a fine of $500.00or onepercentofRespoldent'sannualgrcssincome'

1l whicheveris greater,for eachdaythecontemptcontmues;

1',1 D. OrderingRespondentto comply with the termsof the Orde$ andenteringa

Petitionerfor any loss'
moneyawardin an amountsufficientto compensate

14 injury, or costssufferedby Petitionerasthe result of the contemptand

15 to ensureRespondent's
designed with existingcourtorderc;
compliance

t6 E. Enteringanorderdesigned with theorderoffie

to insuretimelycompliance

on probation'or any
Courtincluding,but not limitedto placingRespondent

t8 other temedythat the Cout determineswould be an effective remedyfor the

19 conlemPr:

20 Orderingthesanctionof confinement ot
for solong asthecontemptcontinues'
F.

2l six months,whicheveris theshorterpenod;

)) G. payPetitioner'slegalfeesandcostsincuffedln
OrderingthatResPondent

brirgingthismotion.

24
Camc RrcmR & DlcE raP
Page2 - MOTION FORORDERTO SHOWCAUSERE:
REMEDIAL CONTEMPT rlffdE (s3) r22 en6
 at this Pointin
moneyawztrdsoughtis not determinable
The maxtmumcompensatory
1 3.

2 time.

3 4. It is requestedthat tbe Courtmakespecialfindings of law andfact pu$ualrt to

4 ORCP62.

5 IT IS SO MOI'ED.

6 DatedthisLL dayofJulY,2010
Gearing,Rackner& Engel,LLP
7

8
La'uraE. Rackner,OSB#84328
9 Attorney for Petitioner

10 PointsandAuthorities:

11
-- Orderto RestrictAccessto Fle
to RestrictAccess
Oia". Vu""tlng Orderto SealFile asto OJIN, Ex-ParteMotion andOrder
12 to File andOrder
OrderAmendinghior Order to RestrictAccessto File
13 ORS33.015et seq
UTCR 19
14 oRCP 68
Mfidavit of Counsel, submiftedherewith
l5

16

t7

18

19

20

2l
,,t

24
Ear D r \ DnED Tr\(.:Ur\\r' a^l qFpF c l - i d c 'P u 'd E R o 'i u l 'r D
PageJ - MUI IUN T(Jt( vr rEK rv orl ,,,,",i1S'.';,;'.1:,. *
REMEDIALcoNrEMPr *E**p,s3,]ff$,,
F* 618)2 e!3
I
i::,:i:..-
7
'ISiUl | 2 ili 2: Cli
3

4
IN THE CIRCUIT COURTFOR THE STATE OF OREGON
5
FOR THE COUNIY OF MULTNOMAH
6
ln the Matter of: )
1 ) CaseNo. 1006-66086
KAINE ANDREW HORMAN, )
8 ) AFFIDAVIT OF COUNSEL RE:
Petitiorer, ) MOTION FOR ORDERTO SHOW
9 ) CAUSE RE: REMEDIAL CON|EMPT
and )
10 )
TERR] LYNN MOULTONHORMAN, )
1l )
ResPondent. ) "',{$i
1i \]JL ' . .G
STATEOFOREGON ) -<-vi\e '_-.t
) ss. .., aYe\2Ja
Countyof Multnomah )
t4
thefollowing:
I,lnura E. Rackner,do herebyswearald depose
15
1. case l makethis affidavit
I am the attomeyfor the Petitionerin the above-captioned

in suppofiof Petitioner'sMotion andOrderto ShowCauseRe: RemedialCotrtempt'

l7
2.PetitionersubmittedaPetitionforRestrainingordertoPreveltAbuse(FamilyAbuse
18
Orderto hevent
Act) on June28,2010(hereafter'thePetition") The Restraining
Prevention
19
on June 28' 2010
Abuse was gratted bi the HonorableKeith Meisenheimer Also on
20
June28, Petitionersubmitteda motion fol an older to restrict accessto the ille. Among the
2l
reasonsPetitionersoughtto restrictaccessto the file were concemsaboutthe investigation

aboutPetitioner'spersonalsafetyand
of his son,Kyron,and concerns
into the disappeamnce

the safetyof his children.

24
Page1 - AFFIDAVIT OF COlll'ISELRE: cem6,R4cdB &ExcE ttP.
MOTION AND ORDERTO SHOW CAUSE RE: CONTEMPT
l;FHdr {sG) u 116
t 3. signedthe Order to RestrictAccessto File on
The HonorableKeith Meisenheimer
to theCourt
or entitiesallowedaccess
to thisOrder,theonly persons
June28,2010. Pursuant

f i l e a r e a sfo l l o w s:1 )Ore g o n cour tsandcour tstaff;2) Anygover nmentalagenc y i 3) T he-

attomeyof recordfor
4 parties(KaineAndrew Hormanalld Teri Moulton Horman);4) The
record
5 and5) The law firm of Gearing,Rackler& Engel' LLP or the attomeyof
Respondent:

6 for Petitioner.

4. signedthe OrderVacatill3
On June 2g,2.A1,0'the HonorableKeith Meisenheimer
7
Accessto File and
8 Orderto SeatFile as to OJIN, Ex-ParteMotion and Order to Restrict
in full force and
9 Order. Otherwise,the June28 Orderto RestrictAccessto File rcmained
the OrderAmending
10 effect. On July 8,2010, the Hononble Keith Meisenleimersigned
June28 Orderrestricting
1t hior Orderto RestrictAccessto File This Orderprcvidesthatthe
relating to the addressof
t2 accessto the file was vacated,exceptlhat accessto the infofllation

IJ Petitionerandtheparties'minorchildwouldremaitrrestricted'

l4 5 . A s s e tfo rth i n mo re d e ta i l b elow,Petitioner has|eam edthatRespondentgav ean

in the court fi1e'
t5 unauthorizedparty(ies)accessto the documentsand/or information
of thecourtfile'
I6 Petitioneris ulawareof theextentof who eiseis awareof the contents
of Petitioner'sson
pertainingto the disappearance
Due to the ongoinginvestigation
tt 6.
public
18 attemptto hire someoneto murderPetitiouer'andthemediaand
Kyron,Respondent's
for accessto this
19 interestin this high profile matter,Petitionerbelievesthat it is important
privacy of the minor
20 informationto remain restrictedin order to protectthe safety and
of this informationto
dissemination an unauthorized
,1 childrcnandPetitioner.Respondent's

'17 to Petitionerandthe children'ssafety'and couldaffectthe interests

party(ies)is detrimentai

andsafetyof otherfamily members.

RF':
Page2 - AFFIDAVIT OF COLTIJSEL & ENCE tlP
RE:coNTEMPT
u6loN .qm onoERTo sHowcAUSE
CBR^G, hc@R

ftrH4E (s03)?1241s
 that
and otherinformationfiom law enforcement
1 7. Petitionerhas receiveddocuments
,, in, and surounding'the restrainingorder' Petitioner
are relevantto the issuespresented

3 a willful violationof this Court'sorderto restrict

believesthat this matetialdemonstrates

4 access portionsof thecourtfile

to sensitive
Order
Act Restraining
5 8. Petitioner'sattomeyis awarethatthe FamilyAbusePrevention
June28' 2010 Petitioneris
6 signedby thjs Coufi was sewedon Responilenton Monday'
that the documentshave
7 further awarethat, pursuantto his request,this Court ordered
andherattorney
from view by anyoneexceptRespondent
rcst ctedaccess
8

9 9. PetitioDer thatthis Court'sorderthatthe materialbe

haslearnedfrom law enforcement

l0 ajldher attoroeyhasbeenviolated
sealedfrom reviewby anyoneotherthanResPondent
Petitioner's attomey that they
l1 ln the courseof its investigation,law enforcementinformed
Petitioneris awareof Mr'
1',' becameawareof an individualby the nameof MichaelCook
did not
he went to high schooliaith him Petitionerbelievesthat ResPondent
Cookbecause

t4 on June4' 2010
knowMr. Cookultil afterhis sonKyron'sdisappearance
and Mr'
Respondent
15 10. Law efforcementinformedPetitionerthat sillceJune4' 2010'
and personalcontacts-
tl ) Cook have had multiple contactsvia phone calls' text messages
phonerecords ln addition'
l7 Petitioner'sattorneyhas also reviewedMr' Cook's work cell

18 PetitionelisawarcthatMr'Cookhasbeenrecentlyinterviewedbylawenforcement.
a numberof
19 11. Petitioneris awarethat pumuantto a searchof Mr' Cook's cell Phone'
Cook's cell phone
20 pages of Petitioner'sreshainingoralerwere photographedby Mr'
that he went to Respondent's
21 Petitioneris awarethat Mr. Cook wasinterviewedandstated
hadbeenservedwith
homeon Monday,June28, 2010,andthat he arrivedafterRespondent
madethe Restrainirlg
that Respondent
the RestrainingOrder' N'Ir.Cook told investigatorc

24
Pase3 - AFFIDAVIToF CottNsELRE: cr:,M6,&{cds &trcELllP
I'A5ION ANO ONOERTO SHOWCAUSERE:CONTEMPT
T4Fuorc (58) 22-9116
 thatwere
I Orderavailable10Mr- Cookfor reviewand,in fact, poilted out particularsectrons

2 that he providedinfotmation
noteworthyto RespondentMr. Cook alsotold investigators
Further'
3 regardirg the documentsthat he had seen to at least two other individuals
of the sealedrestraining
allowedMr. Cookto takecell phonecamelaphotographs
Respondent
4
photograph
order. of panicularconcemto Petitionerwas the fact that a cell phonecamera

addressln fact,the searchof Mr' Cook'scell phone

wastakenof Petitioner'slistedresidence
Mr' Cook'
1 also revealedthat a GoogleMaps searchof the addresswas later perlormedby

8 Mr.cooktoldlawetrfolcementwheninterviewedthalhegottheaddressfromthepaperwolk,
listed
9 that he did an intemet mapssearchfor the addressbut never went to Petitioler's

10 residence.
be
l1 12. Further, Petitioner has learned that Mf Cook a1ld Respondentappear to now

l2 to includesexualactivity- While Petitionercannotstatewhenthe

involvedin a relationship
obtained'it
13 relationshipand sexualactivity actuallybega:r,accordingto the infotmation
after
t4 the sexualnatuteof the rclatioNhipbegaDon or aboutJune30' 2010'four days
appears
custodyof
t:] Petitionerleft the family home, and two days after the Court grantedsole

16 child,Kiara,to Petitioner'
PetitionerandRespondent's

1 3 . L a w e n fo rce me n th a si n fo lmedPetitioner thatthem atedalssuppor tingthi s

Cook include
18 relationshipthat have been obtainedand clarified by interviewswith Mr'

19 of iext messages
huDdreds in variousstagesof
of Respondent
as well as severalphotographs

20 hasmadePetitioneraware
undressand graphicsexualactivity. In a word,law enforcement

were"sexting"on andafterJune30' 2Ol0 While Responde[t'

thatMr. CookandRespondent

the fact that shemissesboth children,Kiara andKyron, the significant

at times,references
Mr' Cook and
majority of the materialdealswith social and personaimattetsbetween

24
Page4 - AFFIDAVIT OF COL]}ISELRE: a E^'cr ttP
M6TIONANDoRDERTo sHow CAUSERE:CoNTEMPT
CuRNc, R{cnd

-rELmoNE (s03):?2-er6
 attorney
1 andbeliesthatassertion RespordentaskedMr' Cookto lie to her own
Respondent

1 andothersaboutthefact thatshehadgote to Mr' Cook'shome'

3 |4']-awenforcementhasinformedPetitioner'SattorneythatRespondetrt'sstatedpe$onal
thosemadeto the man
4 rclationshipconcemsanil sexualoverturesto Mr' Cook resemble

to hireto murderPetitioner'
previouslyattempted
Respondent

6 1 5 . Pe t iti o n e fre ta i n sth e a ctua]ce]lphoner elateddocum entspr ovjdedb y ]aw

1 enforcementandasksthat they beexaminedby the Co.uftin canera'

8 16. hasinfomed Petitioner'sattomeythat an identifiedclerkat

Further,lawenforcement
prior to the serviceof the
9 a known local gym reportedthat on or aboutJu[e 28' 2010' and

10 legal documents, cameto that locationlookingto "abduct"her daughter'Kiara'

ResPondent
gym Respondentaskedthe
1t from the gym daycarecenterwhile Petilioner \4orkedout at the
hasinformed
11 clerk to contacther if Petitionercameto the gyrn with Kiara Law enforcement
then informed law
Petitioner's attorney that the clerk informed the ma[ager' and he

l4 of therequestby Respondent.
enforcement

l5 11. motion'
Petitioneris seekjngthereliefsetforth in the accompanying

lo

18

t9

20

21

22

24 RE:
Pase5 - AFFIDAVIT OF COLIIJSEL e F^GELLL?
M6noN /$D oRDERTo sHow cAUsERE:GoNTEMPT
Guwc,Ir^cd*

rLesoNE (503)2rn6
 Court which
1 18. Petitioneris incurringattorneyfeesto enforcean existingOrderof the
and t}le Petitioner'
7 was designedto promotethe safetyand privacy of the minor children
be requiredto
Petitionerfurtherrequeststhat as a remedialcontemptsanction,Respondent

payhis attomeyfeesand costsincured herein

5 O
Datedthis]gl daYof JulY.20l

6
LauiaE. Rackner,OSB#84328
Attorney for Petitioner

5 SI'BSCRIBEDAND SWORNTO beforemethis 1/"'' daY of JulY, 2010, by

Inura E. Rackner.

10
SEAL
11
1','
@.\li&,,
JULIAJKERSTING
NOTABYPIJBUC.OAEGON
coMMts€roNNo.43?698
MAY31.2013
EXPtnE9
coMMlSSt0N

i3

14

15

16

18

19

2T

24
Page6 - AFFIDAVIT OF COLrI'{SELRF: caRNc, nidn & ENcd LtP
MOTION AND ORDERTO SHOWCAUSERE: CONTEMPT
TErHde (503)2 en6