India's God Krishna Was the King of Jerusalem!

By Gene D. Matlock

What a strange world in which we live! The Catholic Church has

always known that Christianity did not begin with Jesus Christ,
but yet it tries to make us think it did.

St. Augustine of Hippo (354-430 AD) wrote: "This, in our day, is

the Christian religion, not as having been unknown in former
times, but as having recently received that name."

Eusebius of Caesarea (circa 283-371 AD) said: "The religion of

Jesus Christ is neither new nor strange."

In Anacalypsis, The 17th century British orientalist and iconoclast,

Godfrey Higgins, insisted that Christianity was already firmly in
place in both the West and the East, many centuries before Jesus
Christ was born. He said, The Crestians or Christians of the West
probably descended directly from the Buddhists, rather than from
the Brahmins. (Vol. 2, pp 438, 439.)

The existence of the Christians both in Europe and India,

(existed) long anterior to the Christian era... (Vol 2, p. 202.) I
think the most blind and credulous of devotees must allow that
we have the existence of the Cristna of the Brahmins in Thrace,
many hundred years before the Christian era-the birth of Jesus
Christ. (Book X, p. 593.)

"Melito (a Christian bishop of Sardis) in the year 170, claims the

patronage of the emperor, for the now so-called Christian religion,
which he calls "our philosophy," on account of its high antiquity,
has having been imported from countries lying beyond the limits
of the Roman empire, in the region of his ancestor Augustus, who
found the importation ominous of good fortune to his
government." This is an absolute demonstration that Christianity
did not originate in Judea, which was a Roman province, but
really was an exotic oriental fable, imported from India, and that
Paul was doing as he claimed, viz: preaching a God manifest in
the flesh who had been "believed in the world" centuries before
his time, and a doctrine which had already been preached "unto
every creature under heaven." (Bible Myths and Their Parallels in
Other Religions; T. W. Doane, p. 409.)

Religious historians have for hundreds of years struggled to find

out how and why the stories about Jesus and Krishna, who were
born 2,000 years apart, are so nearly identical.

Both Christ and Krishna descended from Noah.

The future births of both messiahs were predicted ahead of

time.

Christ was descended from Abraham

Krishna was the father of Abraham (Brahma).

Christ was at once a Koresh, a Hebrew, and a Yehudi.

Krishna was at once a Kurus, an Abhira, and a Yadava.

Christ was an incarnation of Yah-Veh.

Krishna was at once an incarnation of Vishnu and Shiva.

Christ's first name, Jesus, was Yeshua.

A title of Krishna, meaning "love; devotion," was Yesu. Even

today, many Hindu parents name their sons, Yesu Krishna.

Both men were born of virgins and in a stable.

Krishna's mother was named Devaki.

Jesus mother was called Mary.

Krishna did not have an earthly father as such, but a

protector, named Vasudeva.
 Jesus did not have an earthly father as such, but a mortal
protector named Joseph.

An evil king tried to kill Christ and Krishna when they were
both infants.

To protect the infant Jesus, Joseph and Mary took him to

Maturai, Egypt.

To protect the infant Krishna, his parents, Vasudeva and

Devaki, took him to Mathura, India.

It was predicted that both men would die to atone for the
sins of their people.

As you have probably noticed, they took refuge in places

having almost identical names.

Both men preached to their people.

Christ was crucified and then resurrected. Krishna was killed

by a hunter's arrow and impaled on a tree. Later, he
returned to life.

Christ was crucified in Jerusalem.

Some Hindu scholars think that Krishna died in Jerusalem,

having gone there when his coastal city of Dwarka sank
under the sea. Others say he went to Iraq.

Christ appeared after his "death." Krishna appeared after his

"death."

Both of them have a major holiday dedicated to them on

December 25th.

Christ had a female admirer named Mary Magdalene.

Krishna had a female admirer named Marya Maghadalena.
Fanatically sectarian Christians and Hindus alike militantly reject
the idea that the stories of these two deities are related. The
Christians accuse the Hindus of blurring their identities on
purpose. Some even claim that the Devil himself is the culprit.The
Hindus reciprocate accordingly. Unfortunately, neither side can
prove or disprove anything. In this article, I will attempt to clear
up this mystery once and for all.

The Hindu Equivalent of our Old Testament Story of

Abraham.

The story begins with our Abraham or Brahma as the Hindus

called him. His father was Lord Krishna; his brother was Mahesh
a.k.a Maheshvara who would be our Moses (Heb: Moshe).

The Hindu triad consists of the Gods Brahma, the equivalent of

our God, and Gods Shiva and Vishnu. Actually Shiva and Vishnu
are one and the same deities. Together, they are Brahma (God).
Today, in India, there are only two temples dedicated to God
Brahma because the Hindus say mankind is not yet ready to
worship such a lofty concept.

Hindu Proof That Jesus Is the Son of God!

The Bible tells us that Jesus was both Shiva and Vishnu, for Jesus'
biblical names are Isa/Isha (Shiva), Yeshua (Skt. Yishvara,
pronounced in Sanskrit as Yeshwara), Kristos, and Yesu, another
name of Krishna . Even in India, Lord Krishna was and still is
called Yesu Krishna and Kristna. These names prove to us that
Jesus was both Shiva and Vishnu, thus making Jesus the
begotten son of the Unbegotten-Brahma.
 Picture of Christ.

The preceding information shows us that the Hindus are as

Christian as the Christians are. Morever, the Hindus can prove
that Jesus was the son of God, but we have to accept this as a
matter of faith only. Even so, there is no lack of Christian sects
wanting the Hindus to "convert" to their way of thinking although
we must credit the Hindus with the honor of proving to us that
Jesus is the son of God. But the Hindus don't need to convert to
the spiritual knowledge they bequeathed to us. They were
"converted" thousands of years before our Jesus was born. I say,
leave them be.

Since Krishna was not born of man, he was not actually the
earthly father of Brahma and Mahesh. Therefore, he himself was
the protector (Tara) of Brahma. In Sanskrit, Tara means "savior;
protector." It is a term generally used with the gods Rudra, Shiva,
Vishnu and Brahma. Even our Old Testament says that the father
(protector) of Abraham was Terah (Genesis 11:26.) The Bible
tells us that Abraham and Sarah were half-siblings.
(Genesis 12:19-20.). The Hindu holy books also tell us that a
blood relationship existed between them. The Puranas relate
Sarasvati to Brahma and Vishnu. Most frequently, she is
associated with Brahma. Her connection with him dates earlier
than to any other God. She is portrayed mostly as his wife and
occasionally as his daughter. When Vishnu's popularity in India
increased, myths relating Saraswati to him appeared.
(Ref: Sarasvati and the Gods; www.vishvarupa.com.) Therefore,
Brahma or Vishnu would also have been the Tara (Terah) of
Sarasvati because of her divine origins.

Brahm (Abraham)
 Sarasvati (Sarah)

Abraham or Brahma's home was the land of Haran (Genesis 1:4.)

Haran was the coastal principality governed by Krishna. It was
even named after him because Hara (Sun God) is another name
of Krishna. Brahma/Abraham was 75 years old when he left
Haran.

Just as Christ was crucified on a cross and then returned to life,

Krishna, also known as Haran, was crucified on a tree and then
returned to life. This fact appears to cause some confusion in The
Bible. (Read Genesis 11:26-31).

There is also another "Haran" in India-today's state of Haryana. It

is the region where Abraham decided to stop making idols and
worship only one God. Brahmavarta, a region in Northeastern
Haryana, is said to be the place where mankind was first created.
(Varta=Dwelling.) Brahmavarta was the site of the Kuruksetra
War between the Kurus and Pandavas, in which Lord Krishna
distinguished himself. An ancient and holy river, now dried up, the
Sarasvati, once flowed through Brahmavarta. The Hakra (the
biblical Haggar) was a tributary of the Sarasvati. The relationships
of these three geographical entities make sense. If Brahma
provided the channel or bed for the Sarasvati river, Brahmavarta
could easily have been the symbolical father or brother of
Sarasvati. Hakra (Haggar), being a tributary of Sarasvati,
depended on Sarasvati . So what were Abraham, Sarah, and
Haggar? People, things, or places?

Map of India, showing Haryana

 Map showing Brahmavarta

I have stated that the Bible mentions Haran and Haryana. The
Hindu holy books also say that Brahma/Abrahan lived in Ur of the
Chaldees. Ur was a Sumerian name for "town; city." Chaldee
(pronounced Kaldee) derives from the Sanskrit Kaul, a Brahman
caste, and Deva (demi-god). The North Indian Kauldevas
worshiped idols representing their ancestors. According to the
Hindus, Brahma married Sarasvati in Chaldea, the part that is
now Afghanistan.

Northern Afghanistan was called Uttara Kuru and was a great

center of learning. An Indian woman went there to study and
received the title of Vak i.e. Saraisvati (Lady Sarah). It is believed
that Brahm, her teacher, was so impressed by her beauty,
education, and powerful intellect, that he married her. (The Hindu
History, by Ashkoy Kumar Mazumdar; p. 48, in passim.) Lord
Krishna, the divine father (Terah/Tra) of Brahma/Abraham, was
the king of Haran, with the seaport of Dwarka as its capital.

In about 1900 BC, hundreds of thousands of native Indians

emptied Northern and Central India and fled to the Middle East
after Krishna's Dwarka sank under the water.

Krishna gathered his family together and fled either to the Middle
East or to what is now Iraq. Only some gigantic natural disasters,
such as earthquakes and floods could have caused such an
exodus. It was at this time that the Saraisvati and the Indus
changed their proper beds. The Saraisvati dried up.

Map showing the path of the Sarasvati before it dried up.

The drying up of the Saraisvati... led to a major relocation of the

population centered around the Sindhu and the Sarasvati
valleys... caused a migration westward from India. It is soon after
this time that the Indic element begins to appear all over West
Asia, Egypt, and Greece. (Indic Ideas in the Graeco-Roman
World, by Subhash Kak, taken from IndiaStar online literary
magazine; p. 14.)

And Joshua said unto all the people, Your fathers dwelt... in old
time, even Terah, the father of Abraham, and the father of
Nachor, and they served other gods.

Many people don't understand what is meant by Joshua's remark

about "the other side of the flood."

And Joshua said unto all the people, Your fathers dwelt... in old
time, even Terah, the father of Abraham, and the father of
Nachor, and they served other gods.

And I took your father Abraham from the other side of the flood,
and led him throughout all the land of Canaan... (Joshua 24:2-3.)
Many people don't understand what is meant by Joshua's remark
about "the other side of the flood." They think he was referring to
the Noachide flood. He was referring to the time when God
Krishna's Dwarka and Haran province, in today's Gujarat, sank
under water in about 1900 BC. Abraham, Sarah, and their
followers escaped southward, to the coastal ports of Kalyan and
Sopara (Sophir or Sauvira), in Maharashthra. From there, they
sailed northward to the Middle East. Sarah (Sarsvati) embarked
from the port of Kalyan. At one time, Kalyan was located closer to
the coast, but is now located more than 50 miles inland.
Sarasvati is the patron saint of Kalyan. The patron saint of Sophir
or Sauvira was Parasu Rama (possibly a name of our biblical
Abraham/Brahma).

And I took your father Abraham from the other side of the flood,
and led him throughout all the land of Canaan... (Joshua 24:2-3.)

Indian Author Paramesh Choudhury, author of The India We Have

Lost, claims that Krishna and his family probably fled to Iraq. But
I'm certain that they went to Jerusalem. The word Jerusalem is
derived from Sanskrit: Yadu-Ishalayam, meaning "The Holy Rock
of the Yadu Tribe." Lord Krishna was a Yadu. The Moslems still
revere this huge rock under the Dome of the Rock on Jerusalem
Temple Mount.
 Temple [top] Mount and Dome of the Rock. [bottom]
Abraham's tomb.

Until now, I have been wondering why Krishna's name did not
appear in Jerusalem after his arrival there. Yet, the name of the
king of Jerusalem, Melchizedek, the mentor of Abraham, did. I
once thought that Melchizedek was the name of a certain person.
I made this mistake by thinking that a prince and a son of a
Kassite king, Melik-Sadaksina, was a supernaturally endowed
prince, magician and spiritual giant. I thought he had
accompanied Krishna, Abraham, and Sarah to the Middle East.
Later on, I came to realize that the Sanskrit
word Sadhaka applies to anyone who is an adept, a magician, one
possessed of supernatural powers gained by worshipping a deity
or by uttering magical chants.

I have additionally shown in this article that the New Testament

words for Jesus all refer to Lord Krishna and his holy names. The
early Christians were convinced that Melchizedek was just a prior
incarnation of Jesus Christ, The remains of the Nag Hammadi
manuscript entitled Melchizedek seem to confirm
this. Melchizedek, king of Jerusalem and mentor of his son
Abraham, was none other than ancient India's God Krishna. The
early Christians thought that Jesus was a reincarnation of
Krishna, for who else had the name Yesu Kristna, Isa, Krishna,
etc.?