Daily Session Facilitator Evaluation (INSET 2016) - North District II

This form is to be answered by participants on a daily basis. ALL session for the day and all trainers/facilitators who
conducted sessions for the day will be evaluated.

NOTE: ALL items with Asterisk (*) mark are REQUIRED, thus it has to be answered

USERNAME * (5 characters minimum) DATE :*

Unique enough to identify you, but anonymous enough to keep your real name unknown
Pls. check or underline

Subject Learning Areas: DASHBOARD * Day to Be Rated:*[Day1]

[Day2] ] [Day 3]

I. SIGNIFICANT LEARNING

What is your most significant learning for the day? *

NOTE: Avoid writing down mere session titles.

What will you do differently, given your learning? *

II. EVALUATION OF SESSIONS AND FACILITATORS

Learning Area (Session 1): DASHBOARD * Day to Be

Rated:*[Day1] [Day2] ] [Day 3]

Session 1: How can the session be improved, if at all?

r
Learning Area (Session 2): *

Session 2: How can the session be improved, if at all?

Learning Area (Session 3): * r

Session 3: How can the session be improved, if at all?

Learning Area (Session 4): * r

Session 4: How can the session be improved, if at all?

SESSIONS AND FACILITATORS RATING *

 1 Strongly Disagree 2 Disagree 3 Agree 4 Strongly Agree
FACILITATORS

Mrs. Ms. Mrs. MA.

ADELINA JOSEFINA LILIBETH
SUBJECT
R. B. S.
AREA
CABAER PARADEL ESCALON
COORDINAT
O A A
OR
1. Session started on time
2. Session ended on time
3. Topic was relevant to our work
4. Objectives of the session were achieved
5. Activities were congruent to objectives
6. Activities were appropriate for adult
learners
7. Participants were engaged in activities
8. Learning materials were relevant
9. Learning materials were adequate
10. Learning materials were given on time
11. Time allotment for the topic was
adequate
12. Facilitator exhibited mastery of the topic
13. Facilitator expressed ideas clearly
14. Facilitator asked stimulating questions
15. Facilitator processed questions and
responses to deepen learning
16. Facilitator was sensitive to the
participants mood
17. Facilitator maintained positive learning
environment
18. Facilitator observed proper attire

III. PROGRAM MANAGEMENT AND OPERATIONS *

1 Strongly Disagree 2 Disagree 3 Agree 4 Strongly

Agree
TRAINING VENUE 1 2 3 4
Clean
Equipment were serviceable
Clean comfort rooms
MEALS
Satisfactorily quality
Sufficient quantity
Good Variety
Generally healthy
Served on time
ACCOMMODATIONS
With sufficient space
Clean
Clean comfort rooms
Internet access is usable
PROGRAM MANAGEMENT TEAM
Available when needed
Courteous
Efficient
Responsive to needs of participants
Comments/suggestions for improvement of program management/operations*
_______________________________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________________________________