Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
F. M ans feld*
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
As electrochemical techniques for corrosion research, monitoring,
and control become more sophisticated, and improved software
for the performance and analysis of electrochemical tests Considering the electrochemical nature of corrosion processes, it
becomes available, more detailed information about corrosion be- is not surprising that the application of electrochemical techniques
havior can be obtained from such tests. It is important, however, has been so successful in the evaluation of the kinetics and the
to consider the background and limitations of even such routine mechanisms of corrosion processes. The constant improvement of
tests as polarization techniques. While improved instrumentation instrumentation and the recent development of software for the
and the availability of commercial software have made it much performance and analysis of electrochemical tests have made the
easier to carry out electrochemical corrosion tests, it is important use of electrochemical techniques even more successful. The in-
to plan the performance and analysis of such tests carefully. It is troduction of new techniques, such as electrochemical impedance
pointed out that neglecting the effects of the uncompensated re- spectroscopy (EIS), has made it possible to study the corrosion
sistance ("ohmic drop") can cause severe distortions of polariza- behavior of systems such as polymer-coated metals and anodized
tion curves, underestimation of corrosion rates, and changes in Al, which could not be evaluated previously with traditional DC
the true scan rate of a potentiodynamic curve. Positive feedback techniques. While great progress is being made in the application
and the interrupter technique can be used to eliminate such er- of electrochemical techniques in corrosion research, monitoring,
rors. The choice of the correct scan rate is an important factor in and control, it seems that often the background and the limitations
the performance of potentiodynamic tests. of these techniques are not considered carefully in the planning
Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) has broad- and the analysis of electrochemical tests. In this paper, examples
ened the range of corrosion phenomena which can be studied of the application of different electrochemical techniques wilt be
using electrochemical techniques. Examples of EIS applications given. It will be pointed out that greater care is necessary in the
include the evaluation of corrosion behaviors of polymer-coated performance of routine tests such as potentiodynamic polarization,
metals and anodized Al alloys. EIS can be used as a quality con- where the effects of the uncompensated resistance and scan rate
trol test for anodized Al surfaces and for chromate-conversion- are often ignored. The application of EIS has so far resulted in the
coated Al alloys. It is pointed out that it is on/y possible to use the publication of a large amount of experimental data without much
full power of the EIS technique if suitable models for the imped- interpretation. The need for the development of suitable models
ance behavior and fitting programs for the analysis of EIS data which describe the observed corrosion behavior and allow the
are developed. Examples for such models and software are given transition from the present data collection stage to the data analy-
for polymer-coated steel and anodized Al. A model which sis stage will be demonstrated.
describes the localized corrosion behaviors of Al alloys and Al-
based metal matrix composites is also presented. ELECTROCHEMICAL TECHNIQUES
Polarization Techniques
Presented at CORROSION/88, St. Louis, Missouri, March 1988. The application of polarization techniques, such as poten-
*Corrosion and Environmental Effects Laboratories, Dept. of Materials Science and tiostatic and potentiodynamic polarization, has been very success-
Engineering, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California 90089- ful in evaluating such basic phenomena as passivity and the ef-
0241. fects of alloying and the use of inhibitors on the kinetics of the
0010-9312/88100223/$3.00/0
856 1988, National Association of Corrosion Engineers CORROSIONDecember 1988
CORRO SION SC IE NCE
Rx Ru
2000
Rp 1500
CE REF WE
most of the applied potential results in the ohmic drop with very
little polarization of the electrode surface.
The ohmic drop in polarization measurements can be elimi-
nated in various ways. It can be subtracted from the measured
polarization curve after the measurement using a constant value of
R. which had been either calculated from the cell geometry and
the electrolyte conductivity or measured with a current or potential
pulse or by one of the techniques discussed below. The disadvan-
tage to this approach is that it has to assume a constant value of
R. (which, most likely, is not true for the anodic polarization curve)
and that the scan rate error cannot be corrected by subtracting the
ohmic drop after recording the polarization curve. The ohmic drop
can also be subtracted from the measured polarization curve
mathematically by curve fitting to the Tafel equation. However, the
limitations are the same.
The techniques which are available commercially for the mSec 10.2 mS/divl
compensation of R during the measurement are the positive
feedback and the interrupter techniques. The backgrounds of both
a SCE REF,
MV = 160 mV,
techniques have been described in the electrochemical literature I - 0.34 mA, Ru - 470 ohm.
and will therefore not be discussed in this paper. However, a few
comments regarding the application of these techniques need to
be made here. The positive feedback technique is relatively easy
to apply; however, changing values of R during the measurement
will lead to instabilities of the potentiostat and possible measure-
ment loss. The use of this technique over a wide potential range is
therefore considered to be of only very limited value in corrosion
studies.
en
The interrupter technique avoids the limitations of the positive
0
feedback technique by continuous sampling of the value of R and
subtraction of the ohmic drop IR. However, a detailed study of
the application of this technique in corrosion studies has shown
that it is very difficult to apply and that a number of experimental
considerations have to be made very carefully. This study was
conducted for steel and stainless steel (SS) in ethanolic HCI as a
model solution, which combines relatively low conductivity with mSec I0.05mS/div)
moderate corrosivity, both of which can be varied by varying the
HCI concentration. Data have also been obtained for the anodic b Pt WIRE REF,
and cathodic polarization behavior of AISI 11 304 SS in pure
)
tV = 525 mV,
hydrazine. 4 It was found that the interrupter frequency and the
I = 0.34 mA, Ru = 1.54 kohm.
band width of the potentiostat have to be adjusted to the charac-
teristics of the system given in Figure 1 in order to obtain mean-
ingful results.
A recording of the impedance spectrum in the high-frequency
range provides data which can be used for these adjustments.
Such data, of course, also provide the values of R. at the times of
the measurement. Adjustment of the potentiostat band width is
possible for the Solartront Model 1286. Another very important
aspect which was discovered in this study was that reference elec-
trodes such as the SCE cannot be used in the interrupter tech-
nique. Figure 4 shows traces of the potential decay during the in-
terrupter period, which were recorded which an oscilloscope. Such
observations are essential for the correct application of the inter-
rupter technique. Trace A obtained with a SCE as the REF does
not show the correct shape, despite the Pact that all potentiostat
settings were applied correctly. R, which was determined as 1.5
mSec (0.1mS/divl
kohm from the EIS data, was calculated from Trace A to be 0.47
kohm. Capacitive coupling of the SCE with a Pt wire, which im- C SCE+Pt WIRE
proves the high-frequency response, 9 results in the expected AV - 560 mV,
shape of the potential decay curve (Trace C), but the calculated I - 0.31 mA, Ru - 1.81 kohm.
value of R = 1.81 kohm is too large. Only when the SCE is elim-
inated and a Pt wire is used as the REF, the correct decay curve FIGURE 4. Potential decay during interruption of the applied
and the correct R value can be recorded (Trace B). potential for different reference e lectrodes.
The uncompensated resistance also affects measurements of
the polarization resistance R P in a small polarization range around
the corrosion potential. 2 The experimental value R P " is the sum of with high corrosion rates (low R p ) and good to moderate conduc-
the true value R P and R. (R 1; = R P + P u ). The error caused by tivities (low R) and in systems with low corrosion rates (high R P)
R is equal to R/R p and can have similar magnitudes in systems and low conductivities (high R). Figure 5 shows an example for
measurements of R P for the system Fe/EtOH + 0.01 N HCI. The
1 ' 1 American Iran and Steel Institute (AISI), Washington, DC. ohmic drop was eliminated during the measurement with the posi-
tRegistered trede name. tive feedback technique. Neglect of the contribution of R. would
CO RROSION SCIENCE
400
150
Fe
0.01 N HCVEtON i 100
22 C 200
Eleetrod. Surtaw: 2.0 em'
50
Localized Corrosion -4
Polarization techniques have also been applied for the evalu-
ation of localized corrosion phenomena. The pitting potential E pt
and the protection potential E prot have been used to characterize
the susceptibility of metals and alloys to pitting corrosion. The dif- -6
ference between E prot and the corrosion potential E go has been
used to assess the danger of localized corrosion occurring. How-
ever, both values are affected by the experimental conditions to a Loglil ( I in uA/cm 2 )
degree which depends on the corrosion system, with SSs and Al
alloys being the extremes on either side. The problem with the FIGURE 7. Potentiodynamic polarization curves obtained at differ-
approach of ranking the susceptibility to pitting based on E pit be- ent scan rates for AIS/ 430 SS in 1 N H2 SO 4 (methanol); scan rate
comes apparent for Al alloys, where in aerated NaCI, E p , t equals (mV/s): 0.03 (Curve 1), 0.17 (Curve 2), 0.34 (Curve 3), and 1.00
E co , r . AAt 4) Al 2024 has a more noble E pit , but suffers more dam- (Curve 4).
age from pitting in NaCI than AA Al 6061 or Al 7075, which have a
more negative E pi ,.
From an engineering standpoint, it seems much more impor-
tant to determine pit growth rates than the possibility that pitting
j 2 >Rohrback Cosasco Model 9030 Corrater, Rohrback Cosasco Systems, Santa Fe can occur. Hunkeler and Boehni 11 have developed a method for
Springs, California. the determination of pit growth rates based on a metal foil tech-
(3) American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM), Philadelphia. Pennsylvania. nique. Based on the results obtained with this new technique; they
(4) Aluminum Association (AA), Washington, DC. were able to determine the growth law for pits in Al in the form
2400
N
E N
E 1600 0.5 Hz
G
iN
G
5 Hz
E IN 800
E 0.5Hz
tQ 0.05 Hz
5 3000
E 4
E
U
u 2000
G 3 IN_ 0.05 Hz
IN 2
E
1
1000 0.5 Hz QQ
0.005 Hz
0 1
00
1000 2000 3000 4000 5000
0
Re (2) /S2cm 2
FIGURE 13. Same as in Figure 12, but for three different rotation
a speeds: Curve 1 = 0 s 1 , Curve 2= 4 s 1 , Curve 3 = 14 S 1 (from
Reference 24).
90
Polymer Coatings
m The most successful application of EIS has probably been in
N the evaluation of the corrosion behavior of polymer-coated metals.
L-
FIGURE 11. Bode plots for the data in Figure 10 at 4 Hz (from change with exposure time, A d can be calculated from the experi-
Reference 24).
mental data for R P0 (ohm) = R P /A d . The interfacial impedance Z ;
POLISHED
O POUSHED+ DEGREASED
0 HOT ALKAUNE
A ALKALINE DERUST
A CONC. HNO3
INH. HCI
FREE FILM
Z
O
2
0
a
0
a
0
O
J
TIME. DAYS
0
6 1 1 ' 1 1 ' 1 1 1 ' 1 '
0.1 r 4 200 0
0 v
0.3 a
1
3 300 E
3 og
0 10 0 2 400 W
wW
C 16
33 1 500
50
0 II 600
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18
t(DAYS)
FIGURE 16. Time dependence of R, the corroded area CORR, the delaminated area DEL, and the
corrosion potential E. O.
8
FILM SUR FACE
ALUMINUM HOAR AND WOOD MODEL
Al/Nl ACETATE SEALING
OXIDE (CO) 6
S>
'ORE (R 1 ) L - 24 h
0
S4
N
N
ARRIER g 2
n
'ER (R 2 , C2) I J UNSEALED \
ALUMINUM 0
Co 90
R^
C2
WWQ eo
R2 w0
a R1
Co ^_ X 45
R^ w
C2 NSEALED
C1,1 C1,2
d
b R1,1 R1,2 R2 O F 1 1 1 1 1 1 t 1 1 i
-1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
LOG 2IIf (f In Hz)
C1
FIGURE 18. Bode plots for SAA Al with sealing in Ni acetate (data
Rn C2 from Reference 37, Table 2) for EC in Figure 17(b).
90
f 1 . F)cb cl. f1C f
0 50
W Rb Rt tal
J
2 f
4
W RS FCb
N
Q 30 t.f
1
Cb Cp
Rb RP Rb
n
a T
x10 7 s
CAA Al 7075/0.5N NaCI
x10 6
w
6 6
14 x10 5 E
O
x
2
K 3 x104 N 4 -
x103 !V F
t72
0 ID UNSEALED,3h
J O ^ 0
2 HOT WATER SEAL, 20h
x 10 2 0
2 -
which shows that two time constants occur also for the DCh
sealed surface. Despite these very small differences in the imped-
ance spectra, the corrosion resistance of the DCh-sealed surface O O O
during exposure to NaCI was superior to that of the unsealed sur- _ 60
face. This points to a difference in the sealing mechanism 31.32 w
1
The use of ASTM B457 which requires one measurement at 1000 (7
Hz would result in erroneous conclusions concerning the quality of
the DCh sealing procedure and the resulting corrosion resistance.
y 30
Based on the impedance data obtained for anodized Al alloys
after outdoor exposure for three years, Lorenz and coworkers 34 S
have proposed a modification of the EC in Figure 17(c) to take a
into account changes resulting from the observed corrosion phe-
nomena. The following two cases were considered: (1) penetration
of the outer porous layer without attack of the barrier layer -2 0 2 4 6
("passive pits"), and (2) penetration of both layers resulting in ac- LOG w(w in rad/s)
tive corrosion of the Al-base metal ("active pits"). Figures 20 and
21 show the corresponding ECs and typical impedance plots as a RS=1i2,R P =10 5 f.C p =10 -9 F
function of the area fraction F for which pitting occurred. 32 34 Lo-
renz, et aI 34 . 35 have observed impedance spectra for HW sealed Rb=10 9 2,Cb=5.10 -7 F
SAA Al 99.5 containing artificial pits during exposure to NaCI for
20 h, which were very similar to those shown in Figure 21. Mans- 0
feld and Kendig 31,32 have observed similar impedance spectra for
FIGURE 20. Schematic representation of damage to the outer
CAA Al 2024 with a DCh seal during exposure to NaCI for periods
exceeding 120 h. porous layer of anodized Al: (a) EC and (b) Bode plots as a function
of the area fraction F at which pitting occurred.
In a study on the effects of acid fog on the corrosion behavior
of various materials, Mansfeld, et a1 4 have recently exposed SAA
HW sealed Al at three sites in Southern California. After 15 in the capacitive region resulting from the outer porous layer is
months of exposure in Visalia, California, no damage was ob- slightly different from that of the ideal case (which would be 1 in
served; in fact, the properties of the outer porous layer seemed to a Bode plot), the parameter has been used for fitting purposes.
have improved, as can be seen by the changes of the impedance This deviation from ideal capacitive behavior is considered to re-
spectra compared to those of an unexposed blank in Figure 22. sult from the inhomogeneous nature of the anodized sealed sur-
The simple shape of these impedance plots suggests that the data face which contains the anodized layer and the sealed pores. Ta-
can be fit to the model shown in Figure 17(c). Software has been ble 1 shows the impedance parameters for the unexposed blank,
developed for the fitting of the experimental impedance data which the side of the sample which was facing upward, and that which
results in the numerical values of Cl, C2, and Al. Since the slope was facing downward.
(1 FICb (1 - F)Cp
175
Jk
E
E
0
FAL!
c
..
N i[-\ \ 3//2 /1
N
W
fl \\ /^ / N
RCORR
T i15
tI -
a
-2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 5
LOG 1(1inHz)
60
W Conversion Coatings
EIS has also been found to be very useful as a quality con-
z
trol test for chromate conversion coated Al alloys. 41 Figure 23
30 shows a scatter band for the impedance of AA Al 7075-T73, which
rn
was coated with Alodinet 600 and then exposed to aerated 0.5 N
NaCI for 2 h. The scatter band was determined from the EIS data
for six samples which had been prepared with the same standard
-2 0 2 4 6 procedure for the application of Alodine 600. The mean curve and
LOG w(w in radls) the curves for plus/minus two standard deviations from the mean
were calculated at each measured frequency. This procedure and
b the presentation in a Bode plot have the advantage that the scat-
RS - 1Q. RF - 10 5 4. Cp - 10 -9 F. ter in the data can be evaluated at all frequencies. In Figure 23,
Cb - 5.10 -7 F, Rb - 1094. RCORR - 10 5 Q. Cdf - 3.10'` the scatter becomes larger at the lowest frequencies, where polar-
ization of the electrode can occur because of the drift of the corro-
FIGURE 21. Schematic representation of damage to both oxide sion potential. The EIS data in this frequency range were obtained
layers on anodized Al: (a) EC and (b) Bode plots as a function of F. in a galvanostatic mode at 1 = 0. Figure 24 shows EIS data for a
sample which was not prepared according to the standard proce-
dure. Deviations occur from the standard plot in Figure 23 at the
The reststance R1 of the pores has increased about tenfold highest and lowest frequencies. With increasing exposure time, a
during exposure for the side facing upward. This increase was shoulder in the impedance plot, which becomes more obvious
even higher for the surface facing downward. Apparently, the wet- from the inspection of the phase angle (Figure 24), disappears,
ting/drying cycles in an atmosphere which was not very corrosive the capacitance increases, and the impedance at the lowest fre-
(despite earlier measurements of very low pH values in collected quencies decreases. This strong time dependence of the imped-
fog samples) favors continued sealing of the pores in the outer ance itself is evidence that the conversion-coated surface is unsta-
oxide Iayer. The decrease of the capacitance Cl of this film with bie and not very corrosion-resistant.
exposure time suggests that the film has thickened. These resuits
demonstrate again the detailed information which is available from
EIS data for cases where other methods for corrosion damage Localized Corrosion
analysis would not be sensitive enough to provide meaningful in- The final example of the application of EIS in the author's
formation. The capacitance of the barrier layer for the exposed recent work concerns the detection and monitoring of localized
samples is difficult to determine in the measured frequency range corrosion of Al alloys. 42-45 It has been observed that characteristic
resulting from the large value of R1 and was therefore considered changes occur in the capacitive part and at the lowest frequencies
not to be affected by the exposure test remaining at a constant of the impedance diagram when pitting or crevice corrosion ini-
value of 0.3 to 0.7 p.F/cm 2 , which has been also reported by other
workers. 32-35 1 Registered trede name.
0.5N NaCI. 2h
Al 7075-773IAIodlns 600
vo~ curve s 2a
N
2; 4
T
0
z_
3
N_
02
OL
-2 1 0 1 2
LOG 1(1 IN HZ)
FIGURE 25. EC for localized corrosion of Al alloys and Al-based
FIGURE 23. Scatter band for the impedance of AA Al 7075-773 metal matrix com posites.
coated with Alodine 600 determined for six samples after exposure
to 0.5 N NaCI for 2 h.
90
Al 7075-77310.5 N N*CI
8~mpN A11 75
7b
In 60$
0
1
J
0 1
C_
w
2
3
(3
T M- 3 45 0
2
N_ W W
N W
0
02 T 2 30
J S
a
0 I,
-2
___ /m/, i
-1 0 1 2
0 1
-3
1
-2 -1
1
0
1
1 2
S
FIGURE 24. Bode plots for AA Al 7075-773 coated with Alodine 600 FIGURE 26. Schematic Bode plots for the EC in Figure 25: F = 0
by a nonstandard method: exposure in 0.5 N NaCI for 2h (Curve 1), (Curve 1) a nd F = 0.005 (Curve 2).
1 day (Curve 2), 2 days (Cu rve 3), a n d 7 days (Cu rv e 4).
CORROSION SCIENCE
90
1 -2 h 1 unhealud
2-4 d JAl 707546
3-2hC.Cl.k W
1. CeC1 3 treabed Al 7075-T6
4-23diN7075.76 75 2. As received Al 7075-T6
In 6
60
0
\N
Z W
5
1
N3 45 0
N Q
W
O 2 30 =
0. 4
2 ---- Pfttinp lor 1
LL
OL
-2 -1 0 1 2
LOG f (t IN HZ)
REFERENCES 29. F. Mansfeld, M. W. Kendig, Organic Coatings, Vol. 8, p. 513, Marcel Dekker,
1986.
30. S. Haruyama, M. Asari, T. Tsuru, Proc. Corrosion Protection by Organic Coat-
1. R. Olivier, 6th Meet. Int. Comm. Electrochem. Therm. Kinetics, Poitiers, France, ings, The Electrochemical Society, Princeton, New Jersey, Vol. 87-2, p. 197,
Buttersworth, England, p. 314, 1955. 1987.
2. F. Mansfeld, Corrosion, Vol. 32, p. 143, 1976. 31. F. Mansfeld, M. W. Kendig, Corrosion, Vol. 42, p. 490, 1985.
3. F. Mansfeld, "The Polarization Resistance Technique for Measuring Corrosion 32. F. Mansfeld, M. W. Kendig, J. Electrochem. Soc., Vol. 135, p. 828, 1988.
Currents," Adv. Corr. Sci. and Techn., Vol. 6, p. 163, Plenum Press, 1976. 33. F. Mansfeld, "Evaluation of Corrosion Protection Methods with Electrochemical
4. F. Mansfeld, Y. C. Chen, H. Shih, "Determination and Elimination of the Uncom- Impedance Spectroscopy," Paper No. 481, CORROSION/87, NACE, Houston,
pensated Resistance in Low Conductivity Media," ASTM STP to be published. Texas.
34. J. Hitzig, K. Juettner, W. J. Lorenz, W. Paatsch, J. Electrochem. Soc., Vol. 133,
5. D. Britz, J. Electroanal. Chem., Vol. 88, p. 309, 1978.
p. 887, 1986.
6. M. Kuhn, K.-G. Schuetze, G. Kreysa, E. Heitz, "Electrochemical Corrosion Test-
35. J. Hitzig, K. Juettner, W. J. Lorenz, W. Paatsch, Corros. Sci., Vol. 24, p. 945,
ing," Dechema Monographs, VCH Publishers, Dearfield Beach, Florida, Vol. 101,
1984.
p. 265, 1986.
36. W. Paatsch, W. J. Lorenz, K. Juettner, Metalloberflaeche, Vol. 41, p. 6. 1987.
7. H. Boehni, lecture notes, ETH Zuerich, Switzerland.
37. T. P. Hoar, G. C. Wood, Electrochim. Acta, Vol. 7, p. 333, 1964.
8. F. Mansfeld, Corrosion, Vol. 38, p. 556, 1982
38. M. Koda, H. Takahasi, M. Nagayama, 34th Meeting Int. Soc. Electrochem., Paper
9. F. Mansfeld, S. Lin, Y. C. Chen, H. Shih, J. Electrochem. Soc., Vol. 135, p. 906, No. 803, Erlangen, West Germany, September 1983.
1988. 39. M. W. Kendig, A. Allen, F. Mansfeld, J. Electrochem. Soc., Vol. 131, p. 935,
10. S. Haruyama, T. Tsuru, ASTM STP, 727, p. 167, 1981. 1984.
11. F. Hunkeler, H. Boehni, Corrosion, Vol. 37, p. 645, 1981. 40. F. Mansfeld, G. Chen, H. Shih, "Analysis of the Corrosion Damage of Anodized
12. F. Hunkeler, H. Boehni, Werkst. Korros., Vol. 32, p. 129, 1981. Al after Exposure in California," to be published.
13. F. Hunkeler, H. Boehni, Werkst. Korros., Vol. 34, p. 593, 1983. 41. F. Mansfeld, S. Kim, W. Won, H. Shih, "A Quality Control Test for Chromate
14. F. Mansfeld, Corrosion, Vol. 37, p. 301, 1981. Conversion Coated Al Alloys Based on EIS," to be published.
15. F. Mansfeld, M. W. Kendig, S. Tsai, Corrosion, Vol. 38, p. 556, 1982. 42. F. Mansfeld, S. Lin, S. Kim, H. Shih, Corros. Sci., Vol. 27, p. 997, 1987.
16. W. J. Lorenz, F. Mansfeld, Corros. Sci., Vol. 21, p. 647, 1981. 43. F. Mansfeld, S. Lin, S. Kim, H. Shih, "Corrosion Protection of Al Alloys and Al-
17. F. Mansfeld, M. W. Kendig, Werkst. Korros., Vol. 36, p. 473, 1985. Based Metal Matrix Composites by Chemical Passivation," Paper No. 380,
18. M. W. Kendig, A. Allen, S. Jeanjaquet, F. Mansfeld, CORROSION/85, Paper No. CORROSION/88, NACE, Houston, Texas, submitted to Corrosion.
74, NACE, Houston, Texas. 44. F. Mansfeld, S. Lin, S. Kim, H. Shih, "Surface Modification of Al Alloys and Al-
19. I. Epelboin, C. Gabrielli, M. Keddam, H. Takenouti, ASTM STP, 727,p. 150, 1981. based Metal Matrix Composites by Chemical Passivation," submitted to Electro-
20. R. L. van Meirhaeghe, E. C. Dutoit, F. Cardon, W. P. Gomes, Electrochim. Acta, chim. Acta.
Vol. 21, p. 39, 1976. 45. F. Mansfeld, S. Lin, S. Kim, H. Shih, "Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy
21. D. D. Macdonald, M. Urquidi, J. Electrochem. Soc., Vol. 132, p. 2316, 1985; M. as a Monitoring Tool for Passivation and Localized Corrosion of Al Alloys," Proc.
Urquidi-Macdonald, S. Real, D. D. Macdonald, J. Electrochem. Soc., Vol. 133, p. Symp. Electrochem. Methods in Corrosion Research, Zuerich, Switzerland, July
2018, 1986. 1988, to be published in Metals Forum.
22. H. Shih, F. Mansfeld, "Should the Kramers-Kronig Transforms be Used for the 46. H. Shih, F. Mansfeld, "A Fitting Procedure for Impedance Data of Systems with
Validation of Experimental Impedance Data?," Corrosion, in press. Very Low Corrosion Rates," submitted to Corros. Sci.
23. H. Shih, F. Mansfeld, "Concerning the Usa of the Kramers-Kronig Transforms for 47. H. Shih, F. Mansfeld, "A Fitting Procedure for Impedance Data Obtained for
the Validation of Impedance Data," Corros. Sci., in press. Cases of Localized Corrosion," submitted to Corrosion.
24. K. Juettner, W. J. Lorenz, M. W. Kendig, F. Mansfeld, J. Electrochem. Soc., Vol. 48. F. Mansfeld, S. Lin, S. Kim, H. Shih, "Pitting and Passivation of Al Alloys and
135, p. 332, 1988. Al-Based Metal Matrix Composites," Proc. Transient Techniques in Corrosion
25. F. Mansfeld, Corrosion, Vol. 44, p. 558, 1988. Science, The Electrochemical Society, Chicago, Illinois, October 1988.
26. F. Mansfeld, M. W. Kendig, S. Tsai, Corrosion, Vol. 38, p. 478, 1982. 49. F. Mansfeld, S. Lin, S. Kim, "Evaluation of Corrosion Protection Methods for
27. M. W. Kendig, F. Mansfeld, S. Tsai, Corros. Sci., Vol. 23, p. 317, 1983. Magnesium," submitted to J. Coatings Tech.
28. F. Mansfeld, M. W. Kendig, ASTM STP, 866, p. 122, 1985.