0 évaluation0% ont trouvé ce document utile (0 vote)
74 vues2 pages
This document outlines the marking criteria for an individual lab report with scores allocated to 5 sections: report format, title and objectives, introduction with citations, materials and procedures, result analysis, discussion and conclusion. Each section is assessed on a scale from failing to distinction. Key details assessed include documentation quality, title/objective clarity, introduction quality and citations, explanation of procedures and diagrams, result analysis and discussion/conclusion logicality. The total possible marks are out of 100.
Description originale:
marking scheme for lab report for malaysian student in intrumentation module
This document outlines the marking criteria for an individual lab report with scores allocated to 5 sections: report format, title and objectives, introduction with citations, materials and procedures, result analysis, discussion and conclusion. Each section is assessed on a scale from failing to distinction. Key details assessed include documentation quality, title/objective clarity, introduction quality and citations, explanation of procedures and diagrams, result analysis and discussion/conclusion logicality. The total possible marks are out of 100.
This document outlines the marking criteria for an individual lab report with scores allocated to 5 sections: report format, title and objectives, introduction with citations, materials and procedures, result analysis, discussion and conclusion. Each section is assessed on a scale from failing to distinction. Key details assessed include documentation quality, title/objective clarity, introduction quality and citations, explanation of procedures and diagrams, result analysis and discussion/conclusion logicality. The total possible marks are out of 100.
Report format 0-1 2 3 4 5 (5 Marks) Very poor Rather poor Average Good Excellent documentation documentation documentation documentation documentation Title and objectives 0-1 2 3 4 5 (5 Marks) No title and Poorly stated title and No clear title and Good title and Stated title and objectives objectives objectives objectives with objectives as minor correction required Introduction with 0-2 3-4 5-6 7-8 9-10 citations No introduction Rather poor Introduction not Good introduction Good introduction (10 Marks) and citations introduction without clear without but poor citations as well as citations citations citations Materials and 0-7 8-11 12-15 16-18 19-25 Procedures No materials and No materials and Materials along Materials along Materials along (25 Marks) procedures poorly explained with the with the with the procedures explanation of the explanation of the explanation of the procedures without procedures with procedures with diagrams improper diagrams proper diagrams Result analysis 0-7 8-11 12-15 16-18 19-25 (25 Marks) No results Not correct results Results without Result analysis Result analysis with analysis missing vital the necessary information information Discussion and 0-11 12-14 15-19 20-22 23-30 conclusion No discussion No discussion on General discussion Discussion along Discussion along (30 Marks) and conclusion results and incorrect and conclusion with with conclusion troubleshooting and troubleshooting and general conclusion conclusion as a logical outcome of discussion
DIPLOMA LEVEL 2 APIIT 2017
AENG007-4-2-INM MARKING SCHEME FOR LAB REPORT INDIVIDUAL REPORT
Total marks (100): Lecturer initials: ______ (Chitturi Venkatratnam CVT)