MTI C-00-T2155 R1 Report For Surge Analysis On SW System PDF

SURGE ANALYSIS
ON SEA WATER SYSTEM
Issued Sep. 11 2008 Project Document No: MTI-C-00-T2155 Rev. 1 Page 2 of 14
~ Revision History ~
Rev. Date Description of Change
0 Aug. 7, 2008 Final
1 Sep. 11, 2008 Revised due to SW pipe re-routing caused by SWID pit relocation
SURGE ANALYSIS
ON SEA WATER SYSTEM
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1. SUMMARY............................................................................................................................................... 4
2. ANALYSIS CONDITION .......................................................................................................................... 5
2.1 Analysis Model ................................................................................................................................. 5

2.2 Upset Scenario ................................................................................................................................. 6
3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION............................................................................................................... 10
3.1 Case-1: All of operating pumps (3 pumps) trip............................................................................ 10

3.2 Case-2: One(1) of operating pumps trips ..................................................................................... 12
SURGE ANALYSIS
ON SEA WATER SYSTEM
1. SUMMARY
T&F have carried out surge analysis on sea water (SW) system to confirm that maximum surge pressure and
surge force in the system are within acceptable level.
This analysis has assumed the following two upset scenarios expected in the main SW route:
Case-1: All of operating pumps (3 pumps) trip
Case-2: One(1) of operating pumps trips
Based on the result of surge analysis, it has been found that the additional vacuum breakers (VB) are
necessary at the downstream of C-EA1001A~K to keep the surge pressure less than the SW system design
pressure.
Furthermore, the additional VB at the upstream of SW outlet tie-in (AT-51) in Ammonia Plant is
recommended to mitigate the surge force at pipe elbow in Ammonia Plant.
By these measures, the surge pressure and the surge force will be settled as summarized below:
[With additional VB at C-EA1001A~K downstream only]

z The maximum surge pressure in the system will be fully within the design pressure of 6.0kg/cm2G.
z The maximum surge force is estimated 5.7tonf at the upstream elbow of V-103JTC in Ammonia Plant.
[With additional VB at C-EA1001A~K downstream and the upstream of SW outlet tie-in (AT-51) in Ammonia
Plant]
z The maximum surge force is estimated 3.6tonf at the upstream elbow of V-103JTC in Ammonia Plant.
[With additional VB at C-EA1001A~K downstream only]

z The maximum surge force is estimated 2.2tonf at the Motor Operated Valve (MOV) of the tripped SW
Intake Pump.
z The maximum reverse rotating speed of pump is estimated 490rpm, which is well below the acceptable
limit: 737.5rpm (= 125% of rated speed).
SURGE ANALYSIS
ON SEA WATER SYSTEM
[With additional VB at C-EA1001A~K downstream and the upstream of SW outlet tie-in (AT-51) in Ammonia
Plant]
z The maximum surge force is estimated 2.2tonf at the MOV of the tripped SW Intake Pump.
z The maximum reverse rotating speed of pump is estimated 490rpm, which is well below the acceptable
limit: 737.5rpm (= 125% of rated speed).
2. ANALYSIS CONDITION
2.1 Analysis Model
The analysis models of overall SW system are shown in Fig.1, Fig.2 and Fig.3. Table 1 shows the definition
of each system configuration.
Table1 System Configuration

Additional VB at the Additional VB at the upstream Remarks
downstream of C-EA1001A~K of SW outlet tie-in (AT-51) in
Ammonia Plant
Fig.1 No No Original
Fig.2 Yes No
Fig.3 Yes Yes
In this analysis, the line for chlorination system and desalination plant are ignored because their contribution
to the results of this analysis will be very minor due to their small flow rates (chlorination system: 58 m3/h,
desalination plant: 1174 m3/h) compared with the total flow rate of SW system (= 37500 m3/h).
The pipe length, size, and sound speed in the pipes are summarized in Table 2.
The pump characteristic curve provided by FLOWSERVE is shown in Fig.4. All pumps are driven by motor.
The GD2 and rotation speed of the pump/motor are estimated as in Table 3. In this analysis, three pumps:
C-GA1024A/B/C are in operation and C-GA1024D is standing-by in the normal condition.
The characteristic curve of MOV installed at pump discharge: 44 Model 720F of TOMOE, is shown in Fig.5.
This valve can fully close from full open position within one minute.
SURGE ANALYSIS
ON SEA WATER SYSTEM
Sea water density, viscosity, and vapour pressure used in this analysis are 1022kg/m3, 0.8cP, and
0.043kg/cm2A respectively.
2.2 Upset Scenario
In this study, we assumed two upset scenarios as below, which are considered to occur during the real
operation:
In Case-1, the pump discharge pressure will decrease quickly, which may cause vacuum condition at the
downstream of heat exchangers and/or butterfly valves (BTV). In view of strength of the GRP pipes for SW
system, there is no problem even if full vacuum occurs somewhere in the system. However, such vacuum
condition may cause a big surge pressure due to water column separation and vapour zone collapse. The
main purpose in Case-1 is to confirm if such phenomena would occur.
In Case-2, the pressure in the pump discharge header will be kept high by the remaining two operating
pumps (The stand-by pump is not started automatically as an operating philosophy). The high pressure in
the discharge header causes the rapid reverse flow development through MOV of the tripped pump.
Therefore, this case would generate severe reverse rotation of the tripped pump and pressure surge due to
the MOV closure.
SURGE ANALYSIS
ON SEA WATER SYSTEM
Table 2 Pipe length, size, and sound speed in the pipes

Pipe number Length Size Sound speed Material
(m) (NPS, in) (m/s) *1
1001 1.00 44 1088.72 316L

1002 14.99 44 1088.72 316L
1003 7.03 44 634.74 GRP
1004 150.00 76 634.43 GRP
1005 10.00 76 634.43 GRP
1006 13.00 18 636.73 GRP
1007 10.00 18 636.73 GRP
1008 7.00 18 636.73 GRP
1009 97.40 56 634.52 GRP
1010 145.00 76 634.43 GRP
1011 123.00 76 634.43 GRP
1012 34.00 76 634.43 GRP
1013 261.50 88 854.44 CS
1014 1.00 44 1088.72 316L
1015 14.99 44 1088.72 316L
1016 7.03 44 634.74 GRP
1017 4.60 76 634.43 GRP
1018 1.00 44 1088.72 316L
1019 14.99 44 1088.72 316L
1020 7.03 44 634.74 GRP
1021 4.60 76 634.43 GRP
1022 1.00 44 1088.72 316L
1023 14.99 44 1088.72 316L
1024 7.03 44 634.74 GRP
1025 4.60 76 634.43 GRP
1026 6.00 76 634.43 GRP
1027 13.00 18 636.73 GRP
1028 10.00 18 636.73 GRP
1029 7.00 18 636.73 GRP
1030 6.00 56 634.52 GRP
1031 6.00 76 634.43 GRP
SURGE ANALYSIS
ON SEA WATER SYSTEM
1032 13.00 18 636.73 GRP

1033 10.00 18 636.73 GRP
1034 7.00 18 636.73 GRP
1035 6.00 56 634.52 GRP
1036 6.00 76 634.43 GRP
1037 13.00 18 636.73 GRP
1038 10.00 18 636.73 GRP
1039 7.00 18 636.73 GRP
1040 6.00 56 634.52 GRP
1041 6.00 76 634.43 GRP
1042 13.00 18 636.73 GRP
1043 10.00 18 636.73 GRP
1044 7.00 18 636.73 GRP
1045 6.00 56 634.52 GRP
1046 6.00 76 634.43 GRP
1047 13.00 18 636.73 GRP
1048 10.00 18 636.73 GRP
1049 7.00 18 636.73 GRP
1050 6.00 56 634.52 GRP
1051 6.00 76 634.43 GRP
1052 13.00 18 636.73 GRP
1053 10.00 18 636.73 GRP
1054 7.00 18 636.73 GRP
1055 6.00 56 634.52 GRP
1056 6.00 76 634.43 GRP
1057 13.00 18 636.73 GRP
1058 10.00 18 636.73 GRP
1059 7.00 18 636.73 GRP
1060 6.00 56 634.52 GRP
1061 6.00 76 634.43 GRP
1062 13.00 18 636.73 GRP
1063 10.00 18 636.73 GRP
1064 7.00 18 636.73 GRP
1065 6.00 56 634.52 GRP
1066 6.00 76 634.43 GRP
SURGE ANALYSIS
ON SEA WATER SYSTEM
1067 13.00 18 636.73 GRP

1068 10.00 18 636.73 GRP
1069 7.00 18 636.73 GRP
1070 6.00 56 634.52 GRP
1071 6.00 76 634.43 GRP
1072 13.00 18 636.73 GRP
1073 10.00 18 636.73 GRP
1074 7.00 18 636.73 GRP
1075 6.00 56 634.52 GRP
1076 74.00 56 634.52 GRP
1077 47.20 24 636.28 GRP
1078 13.00 24 636.28 GRP
1079 2.88 18 636.73 GRP
1080 3.10 18 636.73 GRP
1081 2.97 18 636.73 GRP
1082 2.38 18 636.73 GRP
1083 11.50 24 636.28 GRP
1084 16.50 24 636.28 GRP
1085 75.00 56 634.52 GRP
1086 3.80 18 636.73 GRP
1087 3.10 18 636.73 GRP
1088 2.97 18 636.73 GRP
1089 6.46 18 636.73 GRP
1090 62.30 52 634.54 GRP
1091 37.37 48 633.12 GRP
1092 10.83 48 633.12 GRP
1093 77.81 48 633.12 GRP
1094 9.67 48 633.12 GRP
1095 7.40 48 633.12 GRP
1096 *2 1.00 48 633.12 GRP
1097 *2 8.10 48 633.12 GRP
1098 *3 120.00 52 634.54 GRP
*1) Youngs modules of GRP: 24.6GPa
*2) Pipe number: 1096 in Fig.1 configuration.
*3) Pipe number: 1097 in Fig1 configuration
SURGE ANALYSIS
ON SEA WATER SYSTEM
Table 3 GD2 and rotation speed of the pump and motor

GD2 (kgm2) Rotation speed (rpm)
Pump (C-GA1024A/B/C/D) 1065.5 590
Motor (C-GM1024A/B/C/D) 3304.0 590
3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
3.1 Case-1: All of operating pumps (3 pumps) trip
(a) Without any additional VB (current system design: See Fig.1)
Figure 6 shows pressure fluctuation history at the inlet/outlet of C-EA1001K. The pressures at the same
location of other heat exchangers (C-EA1001A~J) also show the similar history. At simulation time = 10sec,
all operating pumps (C-GA1024A/B/C) trip and MOVs in their lines start to close. Then, at 70sec, MOVs fully
close. As shown in this figure, at the outlet of heat exchanger, pressure drops to vapour pressure and vapour
zone is formed after all pumps trip. Then, a big pressure spike appears at 23sec when the vapour zone is
collapsed by liquid column rejoinment.
The maximum surge pressure is estimated 10.7kg/cm2G as in Fig.6, which is greater than the design
pressure of SW system (6.0 kg/cm2G). Therefore, the original system design is not acceptable.
(b) With additional VB at C-EA1001A~K downstream (See Fig.2)
In order to avoid the above maximum surge pressure greater than the SW system design pressure,
installation of additional VB has been examined to eliminate the vacuum condition at the downstream of heat
exchangers: C-EA1001A~K.
Figure 7 shows pressure fluctuation history at the inlet/outlet of C-EA1001K. The pressures at the same
location of other heat exchangers (C-EA1001A~J) also show the similar history. The pressure spikes
appeared in Fig.6 are successfully eliminated as in Fig.7. It means that the additional VB is functioning well
as anticipated.
SURGE ANALYSIS
ON SEA WATER SYSTEM
On the other hand, the surge pressure due to water column separation and vapour zone collapse occurs at
the downstream of BTV in Ammonia Plant at about 12sec as shown in Fig.8. This surge pressure causes
the relatively big surge force: 5.7tonf at the pipe elbow as in Fig.9. It is recommended that the occasional
support design load (static) there should be 14tonf in minimum considering its impulsive nature and some
allowances.
(c) With additional VB at C-EA1001A~K downstream and the upstream of SW outlet tie-in (AT-51) in
Ammonia Plant (See Fig.3)
In order to mitigate the surge force at the pipe elbow in Ammonia Plant as mentioned above, installation of
further additional VB has been examined to eliminate the vacuum condition at the downstream of BTV in
Ammonia Plant.
Figure 10 and Fig.11 show the pressure fluctuation history and the surge force at the pipe elbow in
Ammonia Plant respectively after the installation of the above further additional VB.
By this measure, the surge force at the pipe elbow in Ammonia Plant can be held at 3.6tonf, which will
require pipe supports to withstand the occasional load of 8tonf (static) considering its impulsive nature and
some allowances.
Based on the above results, we recommend installing additional VB at C-EA1001A~K downstream and the
upstream of SW outlet tie-in (AT-51) in Ammonia Plant (See Fig.3).
However, in case the additional VB at the upstream of SW outlet tie-in (AT-51) in Ammonia Plant is not
installed (= applying Fig.2 system configuration), the pipe support at upstream of V-103JTC in Ammonia
Plant should be designed/fabricated to withstand the surge forces of 14tonf (static equivalent) by MAN
Ferrostaal.
SURGE ANALYSIS
ON SEA WATER SYSTEM
3.2 Case-2: One(1) of operating pumps trips
(a) Without any additional VB (current system design: See Fig.1)
There is no discussion here because this configuration has been already judged as unacceptable in
Case-1(a).
(b) With additional VB at C-EA1001A~K downstream (See Fig.2)
Figure 12 shows pressure fluctuation history at the downstream of MOV-2001A. The pressures at the same
location of other MOVs also show the similar history. At simulation time = 10sec, C-GA1024A trips and
MOV-2001A starts to close. Then, at 70sec, MOV-2001A fully closes. This figure shows that any significant
pressure spike will not appear at the moment of MOV full closure (= 70sec). The slow valve closing speed (=
one minute from full open to full close) contributes to it. Figure 13 shows the maximum surge force at MOV in
the tripped pump line. The maximum force at MOV appears just after the pump stop and is estimated 2.2tonf
to the direction of pulling the pump. It is recommended that the occasional support design load (static) there
should be 5tonf in minimum considering its impulsive nature and some allowances.
On the other hand, a pressure spike appears at about 62.6sec around C-EA1001A~K. Figure 14 shows
pressure fluctuation history at the inlet/outlet of C-EA1001K. The pressures at the same location of other
heat exchangers (C-EA1001A~J) also show the similar condition. The pressure spike occurs at the outlet of
heat exchanger by the closure of vacuum breaker (= finish air venting). However, the resultant surge force at
the pipes around the heat exchanger is still within a reasonable level: 1.3tonf as shown in Fig.15. It is
recommended that the occasional support design load (static) there should be 3tonf in minimum
considering its impulsive nature and some allowances.
The SW pumps (C-GA1024A/B/C/D) have a limit of reverse rotation up to 125% of rated speed (737.5rpm =
590rpm x 1.25).
Figure 16 shows the reverse rotation of pump. It has been confirmed that the reverse rotation of the tripped
pump will not reach the limit.
(c) With additional VB at C-EA1001A~K downstream and the upstream of SW outlet tie-in (AT-51) in
Ammonia Plant (See Fig.3)
SURGE ANALYSIS
ON SEA WATER SYSTEM
Figure 17 shows pressure fluctuation history at the downstream of MOV-2001A. The operating scenario is
same as that for Case-2(b) above. It is found that any significant pressure spike will not appear at the
moment of MOV full closure (= 70sec) in this condition also. The slow valve closing speed (= one minute
from full open to full close) contributes to it. Figure 18 shows the maximum surge force at MOV in the tripped
pump line. The maximum force at MOV appears just after the pump stop and is estimated 2.2tonf to the
direction of pulling the pump. It is recommended that the occasional support design load (static) there
should be 5tonf in minimum considering its impulsive nature and some allowances.
The pressure spikes appear at about 51sec to 75sec around C-EA1001A~K. Figure 19 shows pressure
fluctuation history at the inlet/outlet of C-EA1001I. The pressures at the same location of other heat
exchangers (C-EA1001A~H, J, and K) also show the similar condition. The pressure spike occurs at the
outlet of heat exchanger by the closure of vacuum breaker (= finish air venting). However, the resultant surge
force at the pipes around the heat exchanger is still within a reasonable level: 1.0tonf as shown in Fig.20. It is
recommended that the occasional support design load (static) there should be 2.5tonf in minimum
considering its impulsive nature and some allowances.
Figure 21 shows the reverse rotation of pump. It has been confirmed that the reverse rotation of the tripped
pump will not reach the limit, which is 125% of rated speed (737.5rpm = 590rpm x 1.25).
SURGE ANALYSIS
ON SEA WATER SYSTEM
ATTACHMENT
Fig.1 Analysis model of SW system (without additional vacuum breakers)

Fig.2 Analysis model of SW system (with additional vacuum breakers at C-EA1001A~K
downstream)
Fig.3 Analysis model of SW system (with additional vacuum breakers at C-EA1001A~K
downstream and the upstream of SW outlet tie-in (AT-51) in Ammonia Plant)
Fig.4 Assumed pump characteristic curve
Fig.5 Assumed MOV characteristic curve
Fig.6 Pressure fluctuation history at inlet/outlet of C-EA1001K / Case-1(a)
Fig.7 Pressure fluctuation history at inlet/outlet of C-EA1001K / Case-1(b)
Fig.8 Pressure fluctuation history at downstream of BTV in Ammonia Plant / Case-1(b)
Fig.9 Surge Force at the pipe elbow at upstream of V-103JTC / Case-1(b)
Fig.10 Pressure fluctuation history at downstream of BTV in Ammonia Plant / Case-1(c)
Fig.11 Surge Force at the pipe elbow at upstream of V-103JTC / Case-1(c)
Fig.12 Pressure fluctuation history at downstream of MOVs / Case-2(b)
Fig.13 Surge Force at MOV in the tripped pump line / Case-2(b)
Fig.15 Surge Force at the pipe elbow at downstream of C-EA1001K / Case-2(b)
Fig.16 Rotating Speed of Pump / Case-2(b)
Fig.17 Pressure fluctuation history at downstream of MOVs / Case-2(c)
Fig.18 Surge Force at MOV in the tripped pump line / Case-2(c)
Fig.19 Pressure fluctuation history at inlet/outlet of C-EA1001I / Case-2(c)
Fig.20 Surge Force at the pipe elbow at downstream of C-EA1001I / Case-2(c)
Fig.21 Rotating Speed of Pump / Case-2(c)
1071
1066
1061
1056
1051
1046
1041
1036
1031
1026
1090 1076 1005 1004
1077 VEC
VEC VEC 1025 1021 1017

AT-50 TP-501 T&F
VEC
MFS T&F
1091 1078
1072
1067
1062
1057
1052
1047
1042
1037
1032
1027
1006
1024 1020 1016 1003
T&F
MOV-2001D
MOV-2001C
MOV-2001B
MOV-2001A
V-127C
1092 1079 1086

1023 1019 1015 1002
U-EA105A U-EA105B
1073
1068
1063
1058
1053
1048
1043
1038
1033
1028
1007
1093
1080 1087
V-103JTC
1094
1081 1088
1074
1069
1064
1059
1054
1049
1044
1039
1034
1029
1008
1022 1018 1014 1001
T&F
Butterfly Valve Butterfly Valve
VEC
1095
1082 1089
1075
1070
1065
1060
1055
1050
1045
1040
1035
1030
C-GA1024D C-GA1024C C-GA1024B C-GA1024A
Butterfly Valve
C-EA1001A~K
1096 1083
MFS T&F 1009

AT-51 TP-502
VEC VEC
1084
1097 1085 1010 1011 1012 1013
Sea modeled as tank

B.L
Fig.1 Analysis model of SW system (without additional vacuum breakers)
Attachment_of_Report_for_surge_analysis_on_sw_system_rev1.doc
1/12
1071
1066
1061
1056
1051
1046
1041
1036
1031
1026
1090 1076 1005 1004
1077 VEC
VEC VEC 1025 1021 1017

AT-50 TP-501 T&F
VEC
1091 MFS T&F
1078
1072
1067
1062
1057
1052
1047
1042
1037
1032
1027
1006
1024 1020 1016 1003
T&F
V-127C
MOV-2001D
MOV-2001C
MOV-2001B
MOV-2001A
1092
1079 1086
1023 1019 1015 1002
1093 U-EA105A U-EA105B
1073
1068
1063
1058
1053
1048
1043
1038
1033
1028
1007
V-103JTC
1080 1087
1094
1081 1088
1074
1069
1064
1059
1054
1049
1044
1039
1034
1029
1008
1095 1022 1018 1014 1001
T&F
Butterfly Valve VEC
1082 1089
1075
1070
1065
1060
1055
1050
1045
1040
1035
1030
1096
C-EA1001A~K
1083
1097
MFS T&F 1009
AT-51 TP-502
VEC VEC
1084
1098 1085 1010 1011 1012 1013
Sea modeled as tank

B.L
Fig.2 Analysis model of SW system (with additional vacuum breakers at C-EA1001A~K downstream)
2/12
1071
1066
1061
1056
1051
1046
1041
1036
1031
1026
1090 1076 1005 1004
1077 VEC
VEC VEC 1025 1021 1017

AT-50 TP-501 T&F
VEC
1091 MFS T&F
1078
1072
1067
1062
1057
1052
1047
1042
1037
1032
1027
1006
1024 1020 1016 1003
T&F
V-127C
MOV-2001D
MOV-2001C
MOV-2001B
MOV-2001A
1092
1079 1086
1023 1019 1015 1002
1093 U-EA105A U-EA105B
1073
1068
1063
1058
1053
1048
1043
1038
1033
1028
1007
V-103JTC
1080 1087
1094
1081 1088
1074
1069
1064
1059
1054
1049
1044
1039
1034
1029
1008
1095 1022 1018 1014 1001
T&F
Butterfly Valve VEC
1082 1089
1075
1070
1065
1060
1055
1050
1045
1040
1035
1030
1096
C-EA1001A~K
1083
1097
MFS T&F 1009
AT-51 TP-502
VEC VEC
1084
1098 1085 1010 1011 1012 1013
Sea modeled as tank

B.L
Fig.3 Analysis model of SW system (with additional vacuum breakers at C-EA1001A~K downstream and the upstream of SW outlet tie-in (AT-51) in Ammonia Plant)
3/12
Fig.4 Assumed pump characteristic curve
Fig.5 Assumed MOV characteristic curve
4/12
12.0
11.0
10.0 Press at C-EA1001K inlet
9.0 Press at C-EA1001K outlet
Pressure (kg/cm2G)
8.0
7.0
6.0
5.0
4.0
3.0
2.0
1.0
0.0
-1.0
0.0 10.0 20.0 30.0 40.0 50.0 60.0 70.0 80.0 90.0
Time (sec)
Fig.6 Pressure fluctuation history at inlet/outlet of C-EA1001K / Case-1(a)
5.0
Press at C-EA1001K inlet

Pressure (kg/cm2G)
3.0
2.0
1.0
0.0
-1.0
0.0 10.0 20.0 30.0 40.0 50.0 60.0 70.0 80.0 90.0
Time (sec)
5/12
4.0
Press at Ammonia Plant BTV inlet

3.0 Press at Ammonia Plant BTV outlet
Pressure (kg/cm2G)
2.0
1.0
0.0
-1.0
0.0 10.0 20.0 30.0 40.0 50.0 60.0 70.0 80.0 90.0
Time (sec)
Fig.8 Pressure fluctuation history at downstream of BTV in Ammonia Plant / Case-1(b)
4000
3000 V-103JTC Upstream Elbow
2000
1000
0
Force (kgf)
-1000
-2000
-3000
-4000
-5000
-6000
-7000
10.0 11.0 12.0 13.0 14.0 15.0 16.0 17.0 18.0 19.0 20.0
Time (sec)
Fig.9 Surge Force at the pipe elbow at upstream of V-103JTC / Case-1(b)
6/12
4.00
Press at Ammonia Plant BTV inlet
3.00 Press at Ammonia Plant BTV outlet
Pressure (kg/cm2G)
2.00
1.00
0.00
-1.00
0.0 10.0 20.0 30.0 40.0 50.0 60.0 70.0 80.0 90.0
Time (sec)
Fig.10 Pressure fluctuation history at downstream of BTV in Ammonia Plant / Case-1(c)
500
0
-500
-1000
Force (kgf)
-1500 V-103JTC Upstream Elbow
-2000
-2500
-3000
-3500
-4000
10.0 11.0 12.0 13.0 14.0 15.0 16.0 17.0 18.0 19.0 20.0
Time (sec)
Fig.11 Surge Force at the pipe elbow at upstream of V-103JTC / Case-1(c)
7/12
6.0
Press at MOV-2001A downstream

5.0
Pressure (kg/cm2G)
4.0
3.0
2.0
1.0
0.0
0.0 10.0 20.0 30.0 40.0 50.0 60.0 70.0 80.0 90.0
Time (sec)
Fig.12 Pressure fluctuation history at downstream of MOVs / Case-2(b)
500
MOV-2001A
0
-500
Force (kgf)
-1000
-1500
-2000
-2500
10.0 11.0 12.0 13.0 14.0 15.0 16.0 17.0 18.0 19.0 20.0
Time (sec)
Fig.13 Surge Force at MOV in the tripped pump line / Case-2(b)
8/12
5.0
Press at C-EA1001K inlet
Pressure (kg/cm2G)
3.0
2.0
1.0
0.0
-1.0
0.0 10.0 20.0 30.0 40.0 50.0 60.0 70.0 80.0 90.0
Time (sec)
1000
C-EA1001K Downstream Elbow
500
0
Force (kgf)
-500
-1000
-1500
60.0 61.0 62.0 63.0 64.0 65.0 66.0 67.0 68.0 69.0 70.0
Time (sec)
Fig.15 Surge Force at the pipe elbow at downstream of C-EA1001K / Case-2(b)
9/12
800
600
Rotating Speed of C-GA1024A
Rotating Speed (rpm)
400
Rotating Speed of C-GA1024B,C
200
-200
-400
-600
0.0 10.0 20.0 30.0 40.0 50.0 60.0 70.0 80.0 90.0
Time (sec)
Fig.16 Rotating Speed of Pump / Case-2(b)
6.0
5.0 Press at MOV-2001A downstream

Pressure (kg/cm2G)
4.0
3.0
2.0
1.0
0.0
0.0 10.0 20.0 30.0 40.0 50.0 60.0 70.0 80.0 90.0
Time (sec)
Fig.17 Pressure fluctuation history at downstream of MOVs / Case-2(c)
10/12
500
MOV-2001A
0
-500
Force (kgf)
-1000
-1500
-2000
-2500
10.0 11.0 12.0 13.0 14.0 15.0 16.0 17.0 18.0 19.0 20.0
Time (sec)
Fig.18 Surge Force at MOV in the tripped pump line / Case-2(c)
5.0
Press at C-EA1001I inlet
4.0 Press at C-EA1001I outlet
Pressure (kg/cm2G)
3.0
2.0
1.0
0.0
-1.0
0.0 10.0 20.0 30.0 40.0 50.0 60.0 70.0 80.0 90.0
Time (sec)
Fig.19 Pressure fluctuation history at inlet/outlet of C-EA1001I / Case-2(c)
11/12
1500
C-EA1001I Downstream Elbow
1000
500
Force (kgf)
-500
-1000
-1500
70.0 71.0 72.0 73.0 74.0 75.0 76.0 77.0 78.0 79.0 80.0
Time (sec)
Fig.20 Surge Force at the pipe elbow at downstream of C-EA1001I / Case-2(c)
800
600
Rotating Speed of C-GA1024A

Rotating Speed (rpm)
400
Rotating Speed of C-GA1024B,C
200
-200
-400
-600
0.0 10.0 20.0 30.0 40.0 50.0 60.0 70.0 80.0 90.0
Time (sec)
Fig.21 Rotating Speed of Pump / Case-2(c)
12/12

MTI C-00-T2155 R1 Report For Surge Analysis On SW System PDF

Transféré par

Informations du document

Titre original

Copyright

Formats disponibles

Partager ce document

Partager ou intégrer le document

Options de partage

Avez-vous trouvé ce document utile ?

Ce contenu est-il inapproprié ?

Droits d'auteur :

Formats disponibles

MTI C-00-T2155 R1 Report For Surge Analysis On SW System PDF

Transféré par

Droits d'auteur :

Formats disponibles

SURGE ANALYSIS

ON SEA WATER SYSTEM

Issued Sep. 11 2008 Project Document No: MTI-C-00-T2155 Rev. 1 Page 2 of 14

Rev. Date Description of Change

0 Aug. 7, 2008 Final

Issued Sep. 11 2008 Project Document No: MTI-C-00-T2155 Rev. 1 Page 3 of 14

2. ANALYSIS CONDITION .......................................................................................................................... 5

2.1 Analysis Model ................................................................................................................................. 5

3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION............................................................................................................... 10

3.1 Case-1: All of operating pumps (3 pumps) trip............................................................................ 10

Issued Sep. 11 2008 Project Document No: MTI-C-00-T2155 Rev. 1 Page 4 of 14

Case-1: All of operating pumps (3 pumps) trip

[With additional VB at C-EA1001A~K downstream only]

Case-2: One(1) of operating pumps trips

[With additional VB at C-EA1001A~K downstream only]

Issued Sep. 11 2008 Project Document No: MTI-C-00-T2155 Rev. 1 Page 5 of 14

2.1 Analysis Model

Table1 System Configuration

Issued Sep. 11 2008 Project Document No: MTI-C-00-T2155 Rev. 1 Page 6 of 14

2.2 Upset Scenario

Issued Sep. 11 2008 Project Document No: MTI-C-00-T2155 Rev. 1 Page 7 of 14

Table 2 Pipe length, size, and sound speed in the pipes

1001 1.00 44 1088.72 316L

Issued Sep. 11 2008 Project Document No: MTI-C-00-T2155 Rev. 1 Page 8 of 14

1032 13.00 18 636.73 GRP

Issued Sep. 11 2008 Project Document No: MTI-C-00-T2155 Rev. 1 Page 9 of 14

1067 13.00 18 636.73 GRP

Issued Sep. 11 2008 Project Document No: MTI-C-00-T2155 Rev. 1 Page 10 of 14

Table 3 GD2 and rotation speed of the pump and motor

3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

3.1 Case-1: All of operating pumps (3 pumps) trip

(a) Without any additional VB (current system design: See Fig.1)

(b) With additional VB at C-EA1001A~K downstream (See Fig.2)

Issued Sep. 11 2008 Project Document No: MTI-C-00-T2155 Rev. 1 Page 11 of 14

Issued Sep. 11 2008 Project Document No: MTI-C-00-T2155 Rev. 1 Page 12 of 14

3.2 Case-2: One(1) of operating pumps trips

(a) Without any additional VB (current system design: See Fig.1)

(b) With additional VB at C-EA1001A~K downstream (See Fig.2)

Issued Sep. 11 2008 Project Document No: MTI-C-00-T2155 Rev. 1 Page 13 of 14

Issued Sep. 11 2008 Project Document No: MTI-C-00-T2155 Rev. 1 Page 14 of 14

Fig.1 Analysis model of SW system (without additional vacuum breakers)

VEC VEC 1025 1021 1017

1092 1079 1086

MFS T&F 1009

1097 1085 1010 1011 1012 1013

Sea modeled as tank

Fig.1 Analysis model of SW system (without additional vacuum breakers)

VEC VEC 1025 1021 1017

Butterfly Valve VEC

1098 1085 1010 1011 1012 1013

Sea modeled as tank

VEC VEC 1025 1021 1017

Butterfly Valve VEC

1098 1085 1010 1011 1012 1013

Sea modeled as tank

Fig.5 Assumed MOV characteristic curve

Fig.6 Pressure fluctuation history at inlet/outlet of C-EA1001K / Case-1(a)

Press at C-EA1001K inlet

Fig.7 Pressure fluctuation history at inlet/outlet of C-EA1001K / Case-1(b)

Press at Ammonia Plant BTV inlet

-1500 V-103JTC Upstream Elbow

Press at MOV-2001A downstream

5.0 Press at MOV-2001A downstream