Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
University of Miami
This study was supported by a research grant from the National Aeronautics
and Space Administration (NGL 10-007-010). Reprints may be obtained from:
Leonard I. Jacobson, Department of Psychology, University of Miami, Coral
Gables, Florida 33124.
[ChUd Development, 1972, 43, 1111-1115. 1972 by the Society for Research in Child Develop-
ment, Inc. All rights reserved.]
CHILD DEVELOPMENT
METHOD
Subjects and experimenters.The Ss were comprised of 15 boys and 12
girls. The mean age of the Ss was 57.37 months (SD = 7.90). The mean in-
tervening period between program completion and the follow-up IQ adminis-
tration was 14.07 months (SD = 2.76).
Four white, male graduate student Es, well trained in the adminis-
tration of the Stanford-Binet, administered the follow-up IQ tests. The
experimenters had no knowledge of the Ss' previous IQ scores or prior
experimental condition.
Procedure for locating subjects.Few of the Ss still attended the day-
care center in which the program was administered. Therefore, a persistent
effort was made to locate in the community as many of the original partici-
pants as possible. The Es were highly successful in the pursuit, and the
Stanford-Binet was administered to many of the children in their homes or
schools. As a result of this effort, 27 of the original 36 Ss (75%) were re-
evaluated.
RESULTS
An important question is the extent to which a representative sample
of the original Ss was obtained. A comparison of the mean initial IQ
scores of all of the original Ss and those included in the follow-up study
indicated a mean difference in IQ between the groups of 0.40 points. Thus,
no systematic sampling bias was found. For pmposes of clarity, IQ com-
parisons were computed in the present analysis only for those Ss who par-
ticipated in the follow-up investigation.
Fortunately, the present sample size was sufficient for analyses of
changes in IQ during the intervening period as a function of original ex-
perimental condition and initial IQ level. The sample size was not sufficient
1112
LEONARD I. JACOBSON AND URRY E. GREESON
TABLE 1
MEANS AND STANDARD DEVIATIONS FOR THE T H R E E IQ ADMINISTRATIONS
IQ ADMINISTRATION
DISCUSSION
1113
CHJLD DEVELOPMENT
1114
LEONARD 1. JACOBSON AND LARRY E. GREESON
REFERENCES
Harlem Youth Opportunities Unlimited, Inc. (HARYOU). Youth in the ghetto.
New York, 1964.
Jacobson, L. I.; Berger, S. E.; Bergman, R. L.; Millham, J.; & Greeson, L. E.
Effects of age, sex, systematic conceptual learning, acquisition of learning
sets, and programmed social interaction on the intellectual and conceptual
development of preschool children from poverty backgrounds. Child Devel-
opment, 1971, 42, 1399-1417.
Jensen, A. R. How much can we boost IQ and scholastic achievement? Harvard
Educational Review, 1969, 39, 1-123.
Sacks, E. L. Intelligence scores as a function of experimentally established social
relationships between child and examiner. Journal of Abnormal and Social
Psychology, 1952, 47, 354-358.
Whiteman, M., & Deutsch, M. Social disadvantage as related to intellective and
language development. In M. Deutsch, I. Katz, & A. R. Jensen (Eds.), Social
class, race, and psychological development. New York: Holt, Rinehart &
Winston, 1968. Pp. 86-114.
Zigler, E., & Butterfield, E. C. Motivational aspects of changes in IQ test per-
formance of culturally deprived nursery school children. Child Development,
1968, 39, 1-14.
1115