Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
CONTENT
INTRODUCTION
THE INCLINODEFORMETER
THE INCLINODEFORMETER
= =1 =0
Assumption:
is equal to the resulting displacement
vector of the inclinometer casing (from
conventional inclinometer measurements)
Cantilever wall
Main characteristics
- Existing wall stabilizes cutting for a highway
- Height: 12.90m
- High horizontal deformations
To avoid collapse:
=> 3 rows of pre-stressed grouted anchors (pre-
stress forces between 50 kN and 340 kN)
Cantilever wall
Main characteristics
- Existing wall stabilizes cutting for a highway
- Height: 12.90m
- High horizontal deformations
To avoid collapse:
=> 3 rows of pre-stressed grouted anchors (pre-
stress forces between 50 kN and 340 kN)
Main concern: increased earth pressure Measurements with the IDM probe
due to the pre-stressing of the anchors (before and after the remediation work)
ISC 5, 05-09 September 2016
Earth pressure evaluation and safety assessment employing a novel measurement device The Inclinodeformeter
10 Inclinodeformeter Earth pressure changes Application Back analyses - FEA Conclusion
MEASURMENT RESULTS
Inclinometer measurements RESULTS:
Displacement [mm] Conv. inclinometer measurements:
-1.5 -1 -0.5 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 => after the installation of the pre-
0 stressed anchors a deformation in
After anchor
2 installation negative direction
4
After 1 year
Depth [m]
6
- +
8
10
12
14
MEASURMENT RESULTS
Inclinometer measurements IDM measurements RESULTS:
Displacement [mm] Earth Pressure Change [kPa] Conv. inclinometer measurements:
-1.5 -1 -0.5 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 0 20 40 => after the installation of the pre-
0 0 stressed anchors a deformation in
After anchor
2 installation 2 negative direction
4 4
After 1 year IDM measurements:
Depth [m]
12 12
14 14 =0
Facts:
=> model dimensions L/H are 50/25 m
=> earth pressure (and earth pressure change)
in the region of retaining wall => fine
discretization
=> ~2400 elements (15-noded)
=> Hardening Soil model
2.0
Depth [m]
4.0
6.0
8.0
10.0
FE-analysis
12.0 installation anchors
8.0
10.0
FE-analysis
12.0 installation anchors
10.0
Possible Reasons:
=>Torsion of inclinometer casing
12.0 => Assumption of a rotated ellipse is questionable
CURRENT RESEARCH
Inclinometer casing with eight grooves (more measurements)
Research showed that (in some cases) shape of casing can not be described with an ellipse
=> Change of method: determination of oval with best fit of all measurements
Improved IDM system shows confident measurements
Wachter, 2016
WACHTER, B. (2016). Untersuchungen zur Messgenauigkeit und Weiterentwicklung der IDM-Sonde. Master thesis Graz
university of Technology, Graz, Austria.
MARTE, R.; WACHTER, B.; SCHWAGER, M.; AUSWEGER G. (2016). IDM Erddruckmessungen - Weiterentwicklung fr 8-Nut
Inklinometerrohr. In progress.
CONCLUSION
The analysis performed with a novel constitutive model for concrete the
position of the calculated tensile cracks show a very good agreement with
the cracks observed at the cantilever wall.