0 évaluation0% ont trouvé ce document utile (0 vote)
88 vues2 pages
Procter & Gamble acquired Gillette in 2005 for $57 billion. This created synergies through complementary product lines and brands. However, it also led to 6000 job cuts. Warren Buffett, a major Gillette shareholder, profited greatly from the deal. Some questioned whether the acquisition terms were fair to Gillette shareholders given Buffett's windfall.
Description originale:
case study - tata motors
case study - procter and gamble gilette
Procter & Gamble acquired Gillette in 2005 for $57 billion. This created synergies through complementary product lines and brands. However, it also led to 6000 job cuts. Warren Buffett, a major Gillette shareholder, profited greatly from the deal. Some questioned whether the acquisition terms were fair to Gillette shareholders given Buffett's windfall.
Procter & Gamble acquired Gillette in 2005 for $57 billion. This created synergies through complementary product lines and brands. However, it also led to 6000 job cuts. Warren Buffett, a major Gillette shareholder, profited greatly from the deal. Some questioned whether the acquisition terms were fair to Gillette shareholders given Buffett's windfall.
Case study 4 Procter & Gambles Acquisition of Gillette
Problem statement
In 2005, Procter and Gamble announced the acquisition of Gillette for 57
billion of dollars. These two brands offer remarkable similarities in organizational structure, complementarity strengths in their markets and technologies, a stronger lineup of brands, additional opportunities for scale economies. As part of this, the case study also relates financial states of the acquisition. Gillette acquisition has created 6000 workforce reduction. Warren Buffet that was the biggest shareholder of Gilette at that time wins a lots of money from this acquisition. It seems that the Procter and Gambles Acquisition of Gillette represents a conflict of interest as the Gilettes shareholders gain a lots of money from it. We can ask ourselves about the fairness of the transaction.
Recommendations
As a recommendation, we suggest to P&G and Gillette shareholders to
carefully consider factors that might cause ethical problems. To check out the compensation value for example, in the case study it is said that Gillettes CEO earned 164M$.
Case study 5 Tata Motors : Can It Become a Global Contender in
the Automobile Industry?
Problem statement
Tata motors is a successful Indian company that is doing well in developing
countries and is famous for his Nano Car. In 2012, Tata Motors faced different challenges in his Indian Market, new restrictive regulations about diesel and new competitors entered the low- costs car market. But also in his international market, especially the problem of how to export the Nano car in the US market.
Recommendations
Tata Motors should follow a globalization strategy, focused on:
- The growing Indian Market
India has a great potential so the company has to continue on this market and maintain R&D development in order to overcome the diesel problem and find alternative solutions. - The developing countries market Developing countries where the demand from growing middle-class of commercial and passengers cars is growing. Tata motors should launch Nano Cars in those countries. - Penetrate the US market The company has several solutions, as the nano car would clearly cause a problem of safety in highways in the US. The solution could be to redesign the Nano car. And to market the car has middle-upper class such as the SMART cars in Europe. - Developing Jaguar Land Rover in the luxury market Because it will help the Indian company to get market share on the international luxury market and to be present all over the world and in developed countries. (USA,Europe:France,UK)