LABORATORY REPORT (INDIVIDUAL)

TITLE : IMPACT OF JET

SEMESTER : 4 SESSION : 2016/2017
NAME : DANNIAL HARRISSON ANAK MAKERLY COURSE (CODE)
MATRIC NO.: A15MJ0030
GROUP : 6
GROUP MEMBERS : MUHAMMAD SHAMIN BIN SAHARUDIN
NAJIHAH BINTI ABD RAHMAN SMJC2711
SYAFIQ HAMDI BIN FATHI
SANGETHA A/P CHELLADORAI
MOHD AMZAR NAJMI BIN MOHD NASHER
DATE OF EXPERIMENT : 14/03/2017
LECTURER : DR PRAMILA TAMUNAIDU

Criteria Evaluation Scale Weigh Score

Mark
-tage (%)
Below expectation Needs Work Acceptable Good Outstanding
0 1 2 3 4
Background Background
No introduction, Background is Background information
information is vague information is
Introduction including objective vague or brief. No is researched and cited.
or brief. Merely researched and cited. 5
(PO1) and scope are objective and scope Well written objective and
presented. are presented. restating given Adequate objective
scope.
objective and scope. and scope.
Doesnt provide Materials and
Materials enough information Materials are amounts are clearly Materials and amounts are
and No materials or mentioned briefly.
methods methods described to represent an Steps are vague and
mention. Steps are identified ad well written. 3
experimental easy to follow, but Steps are easy to follow.
(PO1) general.
procedure. some are unclear.
Data is complete and
Collect minimal Some data may be Adequate data relevant. Tables are easy
data, poorly missing or not well collected but not well to read and units are
Data collection presented, presented
(PO2) No data reported. labelled. provided. Graphs are 3
missing data,
labeled and show trends.
inaccurate . Tables and figures
recording
properly captioned
Complete analysis with
Simply restating Disorganized or Adequate good supporting
Clear analysis and
Analysis and gathered data and poorly analysed, do analysis and evidence. Describe
Discussion not make sense; not discussion, with goof 7
information. discussion with relationship, trends and
(PO2) enough supporting evidence.
justification/discusssome supporting etc. The finding was well
ion. evidence discussed.

Conclusion
and Well supported
Conclusion and Conclusion is recommend conclusion based on
Recommend- No conclusion and
recommendation brief and Conclusion and ations findings. Conclusions and
recommendation 2.5
ation are present. recommendation are partially recommendations are
is missing..
(PO2) present vaguely. supported by related to objectives
results/
findings

Some related Suitable reference Highly related references,

References
No reference. Irrelevant reference reference with proper format proper format 2
(PO1)
Report is well Report is well organized
Report is somewhat
organized and and cohesive and contains
Report quality No attention to Report contains organized with some
cohesive but contains no mechanical errors. 2.5
(PO1) detail evident many errors. spelling or
some spelling or Presentation seems
grammatical errors.
grammatical errors polished.

Total Score /
100