Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t
Article history: A top down approach based on emulsicationevaporation technique was used to prepare nanodisper-
Received 21 November 2007 sion of a-tocopherol. Physicochemical properties of the prepared nanodispersions were investigated
Received in revised form 13 April 2008 under combination of the processing parameters (pressure and cycle) and ratio of aqueous:organic. Stor-
Accepted 19 April 2008
age study was performed for 3 months to evaluate the stability of all the prepared nanodispersions. The
Available online 28 April 2008
results showed that homogenization pressure have signicant (P < 0.05) inuence on the droplet diam-
eter and size distribution. On the contrary, the processing cycle had not signicant (P > 0.05) effect on
Keywords:
the droplet diameter and size distribution of the prepared nanodispersion. Droplet diameters in the range
a-Tocopherol
Nanodispersion
of 90120 nm were obtained for the prepared a-tocopherol nanodispersions. During storage duration,
High-pressure homogenization there were no signicant (P > 0.05) changes in mean diameters while the concentrations of a-tocopherol
Emulsicationevaporation were signicantly (P < 0.05) reduced for all prepared nanodispersions. In general, it is shown that emul-
Physicochemical properties sicationevaporation technique can be used as a suitable technique for the production of a-tocopherol
Storage stability nanodispersions with narrow size distribution.
2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
0260-8774/$ - see front matter 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2008.04.018
J.N. Cheong et al. / Journal of Food Engineering 89 (2008) 204209 205
by reducing the number of microparticles and the polydispersity contrast to the commonly used two-dimensional estimates of
index (Muller and Peters, 1998). mean droplet prole area. The polydispersity index (PI) is a mea-
The main objective of this study was to prepare and sure for the width of the distribution. It is a measure for the width
characterize the a-tocopherol nanodispersions based on the of the distribution ranging from 0 (monodispersed) to 0.500 (rela-
emulsicationevaporation technique. Various processing parame- tively broad distribution).
ters were investigated during the production of nanodipsersions.
Nanodispersion containing a-tocopherol were obtained based on 4.2. Sample preparation for a-tocopherol determination
the top-down approach by varying the power density of the
homogenizer and the number of homogenization cycles. In the The sample preparation procedures were modied from Iwases
top-down approach, nano-objects are constructed from larger work (2000). Bond Elut C18 cartridges (Varian, Harbor City, CA,
entities (bulk system) without atomic-level control. In addition, USA) were conditioned by washing with 5 ml of methanol and then
the prepared a-tocopherol nanodispersions were stored at 4 C to with 10 ml of deionized water prior to use. One-milliliter of sample
determine their physicochemical stability. was applied to the conditioned Bond Elut C18 cartridge. The car-
tridge was then washed with deionized water (10 ml) and then
2. Materials each with 5%, 25%, and 50% aqueous acetonitrile solution (5 ml)
sequentially, followed by elution with acetonitrile. The eluate
a-Tocopherol (95%) was purchased from SigmaAldrich (M) (10 ml) was further ltered with a membrane lter. An aliquot
Sdn. Bhd. (Missouri, USA). Polyoxyethylene sorbitan mono-laurate (25 ll) of ltrate was injected into the HPLC.
(Tween 20), analytical grade hexane and HPLC grade methanol
were purchased from Fisher Scientic (Leicestershire, UK). 4.3. Determination of a-tocopherol content
3. Preparation of a-tocopherol nanodispersions HPLC separation was performed with Shimadzu liquid chroma-
tography system (CT-10A VP, Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan), equipped
3.1. Pre-emulsication step with SPD-10AV UV-Vis detector, a LC-10AT pump system, and a
CT0-10A oven. Quantitative measurement of a-tocopherol content
The organic phase containing a-tocopherol (1%, w/w) was rst was done at 295 nm. The a-tocopherol was separated on a
dissolved in hexane before dispersing into the aqueous phase con- 4.6 50 mm 3 lm silica gel column (Purospher STAR RP-18 en-
taining (1% w/w) of Tween 20 in deionized water using a conven- capped column; Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) with mobile phase
tional homogenizer (Heidolph Diax-900, Schwabach, Germany) at of methanol: water (99:1 v/v) at 1.0 ml/min. Oven temperature
5000 rpm for 5 min to produce a coarse oil-in-water emulsion. was set at 40 C. The calibration of peak area versus a-tocopherol
Three organic to aqueous phase ratios (in weight fraction) namely concentration was linear in the concentration range of 0.2
1:9, 2:8 and 3:7 were prepared. 1.0 mg/ml (R2 = 0.9931). Injections, in duplicate, were done at each
concentration for standards and samples. All results were ex-
3.2. Preparation of nanodispersion pressed in mg/ml.
The resulting coarse pre-emulsion was immediately passed 4.4. Storage stability
through a high-pressure homogenizer (APV Lab 1000, Albertslund,
Denmark). Solvent was then removed from the ne emulsion by Prepared nanodispersions were placed in duplicate in amber
using a rotary evaporator under reduced pressure (Eyela NE- bottles and stored at 4 C for 90 days. The samples were used to
1001, Tokya Rikakikai Co. Ltd, Tokyo, Japan). Several batches were determine the droplet size, size distribution and retention of a-
prepared, using the mentioned steps, by varying the homogenizing tocopherol content at the interval of 4 weeks.
pressure (2080 MPa) and cycle (13 cycles). In addition, two dif-
ferent ratios of organic to aqueous phase (1:9 and 2:8) were used. 4.5. Statistical analysis
Each dispersion sample was then characterized for droplet size dis-
tribution, a-tocopherol concentration and for further storage eval- All experiments and measurements were duplicated. Data were
uation (4 C with sampling at 4 weeks intervals for a period of 12 statistically analyzed using one-way analysis of variance procedure
weeks). (Minitab (Minitab 13) software package, State College, USA). The
signicant difference level was set a 0.05. Each reported value
was the mean of four analyses from two replications.
4. Characterization of a-tocopherol nanodispersions
The dispersions were characterized in terms of particle size and 5.1. General
size distribution. Particle size analysis measurements were per-
formed using ZetaSizer Nano ZS (Malvern Instrument Ltd, Malvern, The ability to alter the solubility of functional lipids is an attrac-
UK.) Storage stability was assessed by monitoring the size as a tive application, as the poor water solubility of lipids makes them
function of time (up to 3 months). The mean diameter measuring problematic in food formulations. Tan and Nakajima (2005) have
the uctuation of the intensity of the scattered light which is successfully prepared the preparation of b-carotene in nanodisper-
caused by the particle movement. The particle size of the prepared sions. They investigated the inuence of phase ratio and homoge-
a-tocopherol nanodispersions was described by the volume- nization conditions on droplet size and b-carotene content. As a
weighted mean diameter (D4,3). By denition, the volume- continuation from those studies, this paper focused on the
weighted mean islet volume is the mean islet volume if droplets production of the a-tocopherol nanodispersions by high-pressure
are weighted proportional to their volume. This parameter can be homogenization (a top down approach) based on the emulsica-
estimated without assumptions regarding the shape of the droplets tionevaporation technique. In top down approach, size reduction
and provides unbiased information of three-dimensional size, in is performed by application of force and the degree of control in
206 J.N. Cheong et al. / Journal of Food Engineering 89 (2008) 204209
increasing pressure from 20 MPa to 60 MPa had no signicant the homogenization pressures lead to the increase of temperature
(P > 0.05) effect on the droplet size. Possible explanation would in the homogenizers chamber during emulsication, and thus in-
be the fact that this pressure range may not be able to reach the crease the droplet size.
energy threshold necessary to break the particle apart forming In addition to the droplet size analysis, the concentration of pre-
the desired nanodispersions (Floury et al., 2000). In addition, at pared nanodispersions of a-tocopherol was investigated. Tables 4
low shear rates, the forces are not large enough to disrupt the and 5 illustrated the results on the loss of a-tocopherol during
bonds holding the particle together (interfacial forces < disruptive preparation steps for ratios of 1:9 and 2:8, respectively. The con-
forces). According to Keck and Muller (2005), there is no linear tent of a-tocopherol from a freshly prepared coarse emulsion
relationship between the decrease in size and increase in pressure. was approximately 755 mg/l and 1800 mg/l for ratios of 1:9 and ra-
They observed that increasing the pressure stepwise by 50 MPa has tio 2:8, respectively.
not lead to stepwise decrease in a linear relationship. Jafari et al. For both organic/aqueous phase ratios, a-tocopherol contents
(2007c) also observed the same phenomenon for the preparation were signicantly (P < 0.05) decreased with an increase in the
of nanoemulsion of maltodextrin combined with a surface-active pressures and number of homogenizing cycles. After the prepara-
biopolymer. tion steps, the contents of a-tocopherol decreases for both the
In spite of the observation mentioned earlier, it was observed 1:9 and 2:8 ratios at 80 MPa for 3 cycles. It is well known that a-
that by increasing pressure to 80 MPa lead to a signicant tocopherol is sensitive to light, oxygen and heat. In a dynamic high
(P < 0.05) reduction of the droplet size distribution for both the or- pressure system, such as the high pressure homogenizer, tempera-
ganic/aqueous phase ratios. With the increased of pressure to ture rise in the chamber is expected, triggering a loss in the pre-
80 MPa, the energy required to deform the droplets are sufcient pared a-tocopherol in the prepared nanodispersion. In addition,
to overcome the Laplace pressure. These observations showed that the presence of heat, light and oxygen during evaporation process
the intensity of the high shear forces, and the turbulent and/or cav- also contributed to the losses a-tocopherol content. Therefore, a
itations produced during the homogenization process determining loss in the content of a-tocopherol in the sample, after high pres-
the droplet size. These results are in broad agreement with those sure homogenization, is predicted.
reported by Tan and Nakajima (2005). This is a good indication that
droplet size distributions can be controlled by adjusting the 5.4. Stability evaluation of prepared a-tocopherol nanodispersions
homogenization pressure. during storage
Considering both the two ratio of the aqueous:organic phases,
ratio 1:9 showed the smaller droplet size but wider distribution All prepared nanodispersions showed a good stability in term
than ratio 2:8. The main reason for this observation may not be ex- of droplet size distribution. Figs. 1 and 2 show the inuence of
actly claried. Tentatively, the differences might be due to the
organic:aqueous phase variations. Table 4
Becher (1967) showed that the number of times a product Changes in a-tocopherol concentration after the preparation steps (for the
passed through a homogenizer affected the mean droplet size organic:aqueous ratio of 1:9)A
and the droplet size distribution of the nal product. Increasing Pressure Number of After high-pressure After evaporation (mg/l)
of cycle numbers resulted in a decrease in average droplet size (MPa) cycles homogenization (mg/l)
and narrowing the droplet size distribution. However, the observa- ConcentrationB Loss ConcentrationB Loss
tion is not in agreement with our ndings (Table 3). In general, (%) (%)
there is no further decrease in mean droplet size after three 20 1 690 0a 8.6 645 21a 14.6
homogenizing cycles. There was a slight increase in the mean 40 1 650 14b 13.9 625 7ab 17.2
droplet size indicating the maximum dispersity at the given power 60 1 640 14b 15.2 610 28b 19.2
density has been reached. One of the possible explanations is that 80 1 615 7c 18.5 570 14c 24.5
80 2 605 21d 19.9 565 21c 25.2
the droplet size has getting more and more perfect and has reach
80 3 545 21e 27.8 475 7d 37.1
its maximum dispersivity (over-processing), which means that
A
the force and energy required to break the droplets seems to in- Concentrtaion of a-tocopherol after 1st stage homogenization was
755 7.1 mg/l.
crease rather exponentially. Furthermore, temperature can be an B
Each value in the column represents the mean standard deviation of four
important parameter in emulsication affecting both viscosity of analyses from two replications. Means within the column with different super-
the dispersed and continuous phase and also the nature of the scripts are signicantly (P < 0.05) different.
emulsier as a consequence of phase inversion temperature and
its solubility, which can lead to deterioration and would favors
aggregation and consequently affects its stability (Joscelyne and Table 5
Tragardh, 2000; Marie et al., 2002; Floury et al., 2000). Increasing Changes in a-tocopherol concentration after the preparation steps (for the
organic:aqueous ratio of 2:8)A
120 700
110 500
105 400
Droplet Size (nm)
100 300
20MPa, 1 cycle
40Mpa, 1 cycle
200
95 60MPa, 1 cycle
20MPa, 1 cycle 80MPa, 1 cycle
40MPa, 1 cycle 100 80MPa, 2 cycles
90
60MPa, 1 cycle 80MPa, 3 cycles
80MPa, 1 cycle 0
85 0 4 8 12
80MPa, 2 cycles
Storage Duration (week)
80MPa, 3 cycles
80
Fig. 3. Changes in a-tocopherol content for a-tocopherol nanodispersions prepared
0 4 8 12
using various homogenization conditions during storage at 4 C (for organic:aque-
Storage Duration (Week) ous phase ratio of 1:9).
1600
Alpha tocopherol concentration (mg/l)
140
1400
130 1200
1000
120
Droplet size (nm)
800
20MPa, 1 cycle
600 40MPa, 1 cycle
110
60Mpa, 1 cycle
400
80MPa, 1 cycle
100 20MPa, 1 cycle 80MPa, 2 cycles
200
40MPa, 1 cycle 80MPa, 3 cycles
60MPa, 1 cycle 0
90 80MPa, 1 cycle 0 4 8 12
80MPa, 2 cycles Storage Duration (week)
80MPa, 3 cycles
80 Fig. 4. Changes in a-tocopherol content for a-tocopherol nanodispersions prepared
0 4 8 12 using various homogenization conditions during storage at 4 C (for organic:aque-
Storage Duration (Week) ous phase ratio of 2:8).
good physical stability. However, the tocopherol content of the Jafari, S.M., He, Y., Bhandari, B., 2007a. Optimization of nanoemulsions production
by microuidization. European Food Research and Technology 225, 733741.
prepared nanodispersions was signicantly (P < 0.05) reduced dur-
Jafari, S.M., Assadpoor, E., He, Y., Bhandari, B., 2007b. Re-coalescence of emulsion
ing storage. The number of poorly soluble functional lipids are droplets during high-energy emulsication. Food Hydrocolloids, doi:10.1016/
steadily increasing, especially lipids which simultaneously poorly jfoodhyd.2007.09.006.
soluble in water and in non-aqueous media. Therefore, there will Jafari, S.M., He, Y., Bhandari, B., 2007c. Production of sub-micron emulsions by
ultrasound and microuidization techniques. Journal of Food Engineering 82,
be a high demand for formulations overcoming the problem re- 478488.
lated to these solubility problems. Further study will be required Jaiswal, J., Gupta, S.K., Kreuter, J., 2004. Preparation of biodegradable
to develop suitable emulsier system to protect the prepared func- cyclosporinenanoparticles by high-pressure emulsication-solvent
evaporation process. Journal of Controlled Release 96, 169178.
tional lipid of nanodispersion from degradation during prolonged Joscelyne, S.M., Tragardh, G., 2000. Membrane emulsication a literature review.
storage. Journal of Membrane Science 169, 107117.
Jumaa, M., Muller, B.W., 1998. The effect of oil components and homogenization
conditions on the physicochemical properties and stability of parenteral fat
Acknowledgement emulsions. International Journal of Pharmaceutical 163, 8189.
Keck, C.M., Muller, R.H., 2005. Drug nanocrystals of poorly soluble drugs produced
Financial support of this work by Ministry of Science, Technol- by high pressure homogenization. European Journal of Pharmaceutics and
Biopharmaceutics 114.
ogy and Innovation of Malaysia through research Grant IRPA 09- Krause, K.P., Muller, R.H., 2001. Production and characterization of highly
02-04-10059 EAR is gratefully acknowledged. concentrated nanosuspensions by high pressure homogenisation.
International Journal of Pharmaceutics 214, 2124.
Lemos-Senna, E., Wouessidjewe, D., Lesieur, S., Duchene, D., 1998. Preparation of
References
amphiphilic cyclodextrin nanospheres using the emulsication solvent
evaporation method. Inuence of the surfactant on preparation and
Abidi, S.L., 2000. Chromatographic analysis of tocol-derived lipid antioxidants. hydrophobic drug loading. International Journal of Pharmaceutics 170, 119
Journal of Chromatography A 881, 197216. 128.
Becher, P., 1967. Effect of preparative parameters on the initial size distribution Mainardes, R.M., Evangelista, R.C., 2005. PLGA nanoparticles containing
function in oil-in-water emulsions. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science 24, praziquantel: effect of formulation variables on size distribution.
9196. International Journal of Pharmaceutics 290, 137144.
Bouchemal, K., Briancon, S., Perrier, E., Fessi, H., 2004. Nanoemulsion formulation Marie, P., Perrier-Cornet, J.M., Gervais, P., 2002. Inuence of major parameters in
using spontaneous emulsication: solvent, oil and surfactant optimization. emulsication mechanisms using a high-pressure jet. Journal of Food
International journal of pharmaceutics 280, 241251. Engineering 53, 4351.
Constantinides, P.P., Han, J., Davis, S.S., 2006. Advances in the use of tocols as drug Mehnert, W., Mader, K., 2001. Solid lipid nanoparticles: production,
delivery vehicles. Pharmaceutical Research 23, 243255. characterization and applications. Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews 47, 165
Floury, J., Bellettre, J., Legrand, J., Desrumaux, A., 2004a. Analysis of a new high 196.
pressure homogenizer. A study of ow pattern. Chemical Engineering Science Muller, R.H., Peters, K., 1998. Nanosuspensions for the formulation of poorly soluble
59, 843853. drugs. I. Preparation by size-reduction technique. International Journal of
Floury, J., Desrumaux, A., Lardieres, J., 2000. Effect of high-pressure homogenization Pharmaceutics 160, 229237.
on droplet size distributions and rheological properties of model oil-in-water Roesch, R.R., Corredig, M., 2003. Texture and microstructure of emulsions prepared
emulsions. Innovative Food Science and Emerging Technologies 1, 127134. with soy protein concentrate by high-pressure homogenization. LWT 36, 113
Floury, J., Legrand, J., Desrumaux, A., 2004b. Analysis of new type of high pressure 124.
homogenizer. Part B. Study of droplet break-up and recoalescence phenomena.. Sanguansri, P., Augustin, M.A., 2006. Nanoscale materials development a food
Chemical Engineering Science 59, 12851294. industry perspective. Trends in Food Science and Technology 17, 547556.
Helenius, A., McCaslin, D.R., Fries, E., Tanford, C., 1979. Properties of detergents. Saito, M., Yin, L.J., Kobayashi, I., Nakajima, M., 2006. Comparison of stability of
Methods in Enzymology 56, 734749. bovine serum albumin-stabilized emulsions prepared by microchannel
Heurtault, B., Saulnier, P., Pech, P.B., Proust, J-E., Benoit, J-P., 2003. Physico-chemical emulsication and homogenization. Food Hydrocolloids 20, 10201028.
stability of colloidal lipid particles. Biomaterials 24, 42834300. Tadros, T., Izquierdo, P., Esquena, J., Solans, S., 2004. Formation and stability of
Jacobs, C., Kayser, O., Muller, R.H., 2001. Production and characterization of nanoemulsions. Advances in Colloid and interface Science, 303318.
mudadhesive nanosuspensions for the formulation of bupravaquone. Tan, C.P., Nakajima, M., 2005. b-carotene nanodispersions: preparation,
International Journal of Pharmaceutics 24, 2129. characterization and stability evaluation. Food Chemistry 92, 661671.