Vous êtes sur la page 1sur 6

Journal of Food Engineering 89 (2008) 204209

Contents lists available at ScienceDirect

Journal of Food Engineering


journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/jfoodeng

a-Tocopherol nanodispersions: Preparation, characterization and


stability evaluation
Jean Ne Cheong a, Chin Ping Tan a,*, Yaakob B. Che Man a, Misni Misran b
a
Department of Food Technology, Faculty of Food Science and Technology, Universiti Putra Malaysia, 43400 Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia
b
Department of Chemistry, University of Malaya, 50603 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t

Article history: A top down approach based on emulsicationevaporation technique was used to prepare nanodisper-
Received 21 November 2007 sion of a-tocopherol. Physicochemical properties of the prepared nanodispersions were investigated
Received in revised form 13 April 2008 under combination of the processing parameters (pressure and cycle) and ratio of aqueous:organic. Stor-
Accepted 19 April 2008
age study was performed for 3 months to evaluate the stability of all the prepared nanodispersions. The
Available online 28 April 2008
results showed that homogenization pressure have signicant (P < 0.05) inuence on the droplet diam-
eter and size distribution. On the contrary, the processing cycle had not signicant (P > 0.05) effect on
Keywords:
the droplet diameter and size distribution of the prepared nanodispersion. Droplet diameters in the range
a-Tocopherol
Nanodispersion
of 90120 nm were obtained for the prepared a-tocopherol nanodispersions. During storage duration,
High-pressure homogenization there were no signicant (P > 0.05) changes in mean diameters while the concentrations of a-tocopherol
Emulsicationevaporation were signicantly (P < 0.05) reduced for all prepared nanodispersions. In general, it is shown that emul-
Physicochemical properties sicationevaporation technique can be used as a suitable technique for the production of a-tocopherol
Storage stability nanodispersions with narrow size distribution.
2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

1. Introduction to the special feature of nanodispersions whereby it has been


shown that nanosized dispersion increases the surface areas and
Natural antioxidants such as a-, b-, c-, d-tocopherol and tocot- dissolution velocity thus increasing the saturation solubility (Kra-
rienols are widely used in vitamin supplementation and as antiox- use and Muller, 2001; Jacobs et al., 2001). The emulsication
idants in the food, cosmetic and pharmaceutical industries evaporation technique is one the techniques used for preparing
(Constantinides et al., 2006). The general trend of biological activ- the nanosized dispersions (Mehnert and Mader, 2001). This tech-
ity of some compounds of vitamin E has been reported as follows: nique has been used in incorporating an anti-helmintic drug: pra-
a-tocopherol > b-tocopherol > a-tocotrienol > c-tocopherol > b- ziquantel into poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) nanoparticles in the
tocotrienol > d-tocopherol (Abidi, 2000). Vitamin E, a lipid-soluble treatment of schistosomiasis (Mainardes and Evangelista, 2005).
antioxidant, is often regarded to a-tocopherol. Lemos-Senna et al. (1998) prepared amphiphilic cyclodextrin nan-
Functional lipids are bioactive compounds with substantial ospheres using the emulsication-solvent evaporation method as a
health benet. However, poor water solubility of these compounds promising carrier for hydrophobic drugs. Meanwhile, Jaiswal et al.
has made their use problematic in food formulation (Tan and Nak- (2004) prepared biodegradable cyclosporine nanoparticles, a po-
ajima, 2005). Most of the antioxidants are almost insoluble in tent immunosuppressive drug, by high-pressure emulsication-
water or show a very low water solubility leading to insufcient solvent evaporation process to improve the oral bioavailability
bioavailability especially after oral or parenteral/intravenous and pharmacokinetics.
administration and very often below the therapeutic level (Muller In general, the control in size reduction processes inuences the
and Peters, 1998). Hence, issue related to the solubility of this properties of the produced materials. Size greatly relates to func-
ingredient has become one of the major considerations in the food tionality of food materials. A smaller size means bigger surface area
industry. and is desirable to improve absorption and bioavailability of bioac-
Great attentions have been paid for the research and develop- tive compounds. High-pressure homogenization has been exten-
ment to overcome this problem. Nanodispersion is an alternative sively used to emulsify, disperse, mix and process the products in
and promising approach to overcome bioavailability problems various industrial sectors: chemical, pharmaceutical, specialty
(Krause and Muller, 2001). The increase in bioavailability is due foods, food science research and biotechnology (Floury et al.,
2004a; Roesch and Corredig, 2003; Jafari et al., 2007a). Homogeni-
* Corresponding author. Tel.: +60 3 89468418; fax: +60 3 89423552. zation processes are mostly possible in reducing the mean droplet
E-mail address: tancp@putra.upm.edu.my (C.P. Tan). size, and simultaneously narrows the width of the size distribution

0260-8774/$ - see front matter 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2008.04.018
J.N. Cheong et al. / Journal of Food Engineering 89 (2008) 204209 205

by reducing the number of microparticles and the polydispersity contrast to the commonly used two-dimensional estimates of
index (Muller and Peters, 1998). mean droplet prole area. The polydispersity index (PI) is a mea-
The main objective of this study was to prepare and sure for the width of the distribution. It is a measure for the width
characterize the a-tocopherol nanodispersions based on the of the distribution ranging from 0 (monodispersed) to 0.500 (rela-
emulsicationevaporation technique. Various processing parame- tively broad distribution).
ters were investigated during the production of nanodipsersions.
Nanodispersion containing a-tocopherol were obtained based on 4.2. Sample preparation for a-tocopherol determination
the top-down approach by varying the power density of the
homogenizer and the number of homogenization cycles. In the The sample preparation procedures were modied from Iwases
top-down approach, nano-objects are constructed from larger work (2000). Bond Elut C18 cartridges (Varian, Harbor City, CA,
entities (bulk system) without atomic-level control. In addition, USA) were conditioned by washing with 5 ml of methanol and then
the prepared a-tocopherol nanodispersions were stored at 4 C to with 10 ml of deionized water prior to use. One-milliliter of sample
determine their physicochemical stability. was applied to the conditioned Bond Elut C18 cartridge. The car-
tridge was then washed with deionized water (10 ml) and then
2. Materials each with 5%, 25%, and 50% aqueous acetonitrile solution (5 ml)
sequentially, followed by elution with acetonitrile. The eluate
a-Tocopherol (95%) was purchased from SigmaAldrich (M) (10 ml) was further ltered with a membrane lter. An aliquot
Sdn. Bhd. (Missouri, USA). Polyoxyethylene sorbitan mono-laurate (25 ll) of ltrate was injected into the HPLC.
(Tween 20), analytical grade hexane and HPLC grade methanol
were purchased from Fisher Scientic (Leicestershire, UK). 4.3. Determination of a-tocopherol content

3. Preparation of a-tocopherol nanodispersions HPLC separation was performed with Shimadzu liquid chroma-
tography system (CT-10A VP, Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan), equipped
3.1. Pre-emulsication step with SPD-10AV UV-Vis detector, a LC-10AT pump system, and a
CT0-10A oven. Quantitative measurement of a-tocopherol content
The organic phase containing a-tocopherol (1%, w/w) was rst was done at 295 nm. The a-tocopherol was separated on a
dissolved in hexane before dispersing into the aqueous phase con- 4.6  50 mm 3 lm silica gel column (Purospher STAR RP-18 en-
taining (1% w/w) of Tween 20 in deionized water using a conven- capped column; Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) with mobile phase
tional homogenizer (Heidolph Diax-900, Schwabach, Germany) at of methanol: water (99:1 v/v) at 1.0 ml/min. Oven temperature
5000 rpm for 5 min to produce a coarse oil-in-water emulsion. was set at 40 C. The calibration of peak area versus a-tocopherol
Three organic to aqueous phase ratios (in weight fraction) namely concentration was linear in the concentration range of 0.2
1:9, 2:8 and 3:7 were prepared. 1.0 mg/ml (R2 = 0.9931). Injections, in duplicate, were done at each
concentration for standards and samples. All results were ex-
3.2. Preparation of nanodispersion pressed in mg/ml.

The resulting coarse pre-emulsion was immediately passed 4.4. Storage stability
through a high-pressure homogenizer (APV Lab 1000, Albertslund,
Denmark). Solvent was then removed from the ne emulsion by Prepared nanodispersions were placed in duplicate in amber
using a rotary evaporator under reduced pressure (Eyela NE- bottles and stored at 4 C for 90 days. The samples were used to
1001, Tokya Rikakikai Co. Ltd, Tokyo, Japan). Several batches were determine the droplet size, size distribution and retention of a-
prepared, using the mentioned steps, by varying the homogenizing tocopherol content at the interval of 4 weeks.
pressure (2080 MPa) and cycle (13 cycles). In addition, two dif-
ferent ratios of organic to aqueous phase (1:9 and 2:8) were used. 4.5. Statistical analysis
Each dispersion sample was then characterized for droplet size dis-
tribution, a-tocopherol concentration and for further storage eval- All experiments and measurements were duplicated. Data were
uation (4 C with sampling at 4 weeks intervals for a period of 12 statistically analyzed using one-way analysis of variance procedure
weeks). (Minitab (Minitab 13) software package, State College, USA). The
signicant difference level was set a 0.05. Each reported value
was the mean of four analyses from two replications.
4. Characterization of a-tocopherol nanodispersions

4.1. Particle size analysis 5. Results and discussions

The dispersions were characterized in terms of particle size and 5.1. General
size distribution. Particle size analysis measurements were per-
formed using ZetaSizer Nano ZS (Malvern Instrument Ltd, Malvern, The ability to alter the solubility of functional lipids is an attrac-
UK.) Storage stability was assessed by monitoring the size as a tive application, as the poor water solubility of lipids makes them
function of time (up to 3 months). The mean diameter measuring problematic in food formulations. Tan and Nakajima (2005) have
the uctuation of the intensity of the scattered light which is successfully prepared the preparation of b-carotene in nanodisper-
caused by the particle movement. The particle size of the prepared sions. They investigated the inuence of phase ratio and homoge-
a-tocopherol nanodispersions was described by the volume- nization conditions on droplet size and b-carotene content. As a
weighted mean diameter (D4,3). By denition, the volume- continuation from those studies, this paper focused on the
weighted mean islet volume is the mean islet volume if droplets production of the a-tocopherol nanodispersions by high-pressure
are weighted proportional to their volume. This parameter can be homogenization (a top down approach) based on the emulsica-
estimated without assumptions regarding the shape of the droplets tionevaporation technique. In top down approach, size reduction
and provides unbiased information of three-dimensional size, in is performed by application of force and the degree of control in
206 J.N. Cheong et al. / Journal of Food Engineering 89 (2008) 204209

size reduction processes inuences the properties of the produced Table 1


materials (Sanguansri and Augustin, 2006). In general, the mean Characteristic of droplet size (D4,3, nm) of a-tocopherol nanodispersions prepared
with different ratios of mixtures using two different homogenization pressuresA
diameters of the nanodispersions were considerably small after
the homogenization process by a high-pressure homogenizer. In Organic:aqueous phase ratio Pressure (MPa)B
a high-pressure homogenizer, the oil and water mixture is sub- 20 80
jected to intense shear forces, turbulence, cavitations, pressure gra- 1:9 106.6 2.7a 95.8 3.2a
dient and also recirculating regions, which lead to the break up of 2:8 119.6 1.5b 106.2 2.2b
the dispersed phase into smaller size (Floury et al., 2004b. In this 3:7 146.0 5.0c 129.5 1.9c
study, the dispersion was forced through a narrow homogenization A
Each value in the table represents the mean standard deviation of four mea-
gap with a very high velocity, which lead to droplets size in the surements from two replications.
B
nanometric range (typically having the range of 90120 nm) after Means within each column with different letters (a, b, or c) are signicantly
the emulsicationevaporation process. Bouchemal and co-work- different from each other (p < 0.05).
ers (2004) has successfully reported to produce a-tocopherol nano-
dipsersion of 171 2 nm using spontaneous emulsication
technique. However, high-pressure emulsication technique will portion would lead to a signicant (P < 0.05) increase in the parti-
be more suitable and applicable in the modern emulsication tech- cle size of the prepared nanodispersion regardless of the pressure
nique because of the extreme emulsication conditions that is cre- applied. The increase in the droplet sizes could be partly attributed
ation of very high density at a very short time on a small volume of to an increase in the concentration of dispersed phase, which sub-
dispersion. sequently leading to a higher probability of recoalescence of drop-
In the present study, a-tocopherol was rst dissolved in hexane lets. Furthermore, as the organic volume increases, incomplete
before dispersing to the continuous phase containing emulsier in covering of droplet interface by emulsier molecules, which favors
deionized water using a conventional homogenizer. The pre-coarse droplet aggregation and thus increases the mean droplet sizes
dispersion in the micron range was further homogenized using a (Jafari et al., 2007b). In addition, this observation might be also
high-pressure homogenizer. Hexane was then removed using an attributed to the reduction of the shear stress during homogeniz-
evaporator under reduced pressure. The formation of a-tocopherol ing process, resulting from higher viscosity of the organic phase
nanoparticles happened as hexane diffuses into the aqueous phase and consequently a less favorable mixing efciency and larger
and evaporates at the water/air interface. Due to the high interfa- emulsion droplets (Jumaa and Muller, 1998). Due to this reason,
cial tension between the organic and aqueous phases, emulsier organic to aqueous ratio of 3:7 was not selected for subsequent
such as Tween 20 is used to allow the existence of interfacial ten- study.
sion gradients, which is crucial for formation of stable droplets.
Emulsiers play major roles in formation of nanoemulsion: by low- 5.3. Effect of homogenization parameters on the physicochemical
ering the interfacial tension, Laplace pressure is reduced and hence properties of a-tocopherol nanodispersions
the stress needed to break up a drop is reduced (Tadros et al.,
2004). Marie and co-workers (2002) have shown that with emulsi- To study the effect of different homogenization pressures in
ers concentration higher than 1% in the aqueous phase did not in- preparing the a-tocopherol nanodispersions, two different
duce a decrease in particle size. This may due to the low critical organic:aqueous ratios were xed (1:9 and 2:8). In general, a
micelle concentration value (60 mg/l) for Tween 20 (Helenius high-pressure homogenization pressure ensures a good emulsica-
et al., 1979). Stabilizer used has an effect on the long-term stability tion process and therefore leads to smaller particles. The efciency
(avoidance of aggregates), but had no effect on maximum disper- of the emulsication process was recorded by measuring the mean
sity and no effect on the shape of the produced nanodispersions droplets diameter. The homogenization was performed using a
(Keck and Muller, 2005). Therefore, in this study we xed the type two-stage homogenizer with pressure ranging from 20 to
and concentration of emulsier, while the inuence of organic to 80 MPa. Table 2 shows the mean droplet diameters of nanodisper-
aqueous phase ratio and homogenization conditions was investi- sions prepared in different operative conditions.
gated. Tween 20, a non-ionic emulsier that absorbs very quickly Generally, the results demonstrated that all of the pressures ap-
at the oilwater interface, has shown results in small particle for plied lead to a size reduction, although no consistent trend shown.
various applications. For the use of suitable concentration of Tween This shows that the intense turbulent and shear ow elds in the
20, a preliminary study showed that 1% of Tween 20 in water was gap generated at the applied homogenization pressure were
adequate to produce a-tocopherol dispersion within the accept- sufciently enough to break droplets, which were distinctly larger
able nano range (data not shown). than the gap width in the high pressure homogenizer. However,

5.2. Effect of organic/aqueous phase ratio on the size distribution of a-


tocopherol nanodispersions Table 2
Characteristic of droplet size of a-tocopherol nanodispersions prepared using
Table 1 shows the average droplet size parameters of a-tocoph- different homogenization pressureA
erol nanodispersions determined by the photon correlation Pressure Organic:aqueous phase ratioB
spectroscopy (PCS) technique for three different ratios (MPa)
1:9 2:8
(organic:aqueous), namely 1:9, 2:8 and 3:7. For three of these
Droplet size, Polydispersity Droplet size, Polydispersity
organic/aqueous ratios, the average droplets sizes signicantly
D4,3 (nm) index (PI) D4,3 (nm) index (PI)
(P < 0.05) increased with an increase in the organic phase portion
20 106.6 2.7a 0.32 0.09a 119.7 1.5a 0.21 0.01a
for both applied pressures; 20 MPa and 80 MPa.
40 104.1 2.9a 0.40 0.19b 120.7 0.4b 0.24 0.01b
In general, for the pressure applied at 20 MPa, the droplets size 60 102.8 3.2a 0.38 0.12c 110.8 0.6a,b 0.24 0.02c
distribution extended from 100 to 120 nm with an increase in the 80 95.8 3.2b 0.43 0.14d 106.2 2.2c 0.29 0.03c,d
portion of organic phase. Similar particle size distribution trend A
Each value in the table represents the mean SD of four measurements from
can be observed when pressure was applied at 80 MPa, with the two replications.
droplet size distribution obtained extended from 90 to 110 nm. B
Means within each column with different letters (a, b, or c) are signicantly
These results clearly showed that an increase of the organic phase different from each other (p < 0.05).
J.N. Cheong et al. / Journal of Food Engineering 89 (2008) 204209 207

increasing pressure from 20 MPa to 60 MPa had no signicant the homogenization pressures lead to the increase of temperature
(P > 0.05) effect on the droplet size. Possible explanation would in the homogenizers chamber during emulsication, and thus in-
be the fact that this pressure range may not be able to reach the crease the droplet size.
energy threshold necessary to break the particle apart forming In addition to the droplet size analysis, the concentration of pre-
the desired nanodispersions (Floury et al., 2000). In addition, at pared nanodispersions of a-tocopherol was investigated. Tables 4
low shear rates, the forces are not large enough to disrupt the and 5 illustrated the results on the loss of a-tocopherol during
bonds holding the particle together (interfacial forces < disruptive preparation steps for ratios of 1:9 and 2:8, respectively. The con-
forces). According to Keck and Muller (2005), there is no linear tent of a-tocopherol from a freshly prepared coarse emulsion
relationship between the decrease in size and increase in pressure. was approximately 755 mg/l and 1800 mg/l for ratios of 1:9 and ra-
They observed that increasing the pressure stepwise by 50 MPa has tio 2:8, respectively.
not lead to stepwise decrease in a linear relationship. Jafari et al. For both organic/aqueous phase ratios, a-tocopherol contents
(2007c) also observed the same phenomenon for the preparation were signicantly (P < 0.05) decreased with an increase in the
of nanoemulsion of maltodextrin combined with a surface-active pressures and number of homogenizing cycles. After the prepara-
biopolymer. tion steps, the contents of a-tocopherol decreases for both the
In spite of the observation mentioned earlier, it was observed 1:9 and 2:8 ratios at 80 MPa for 3 cycles. It is well known that a-
that by increasing pressure to 80 MPa lead to a signicant tocopherol is sensitive to light, oxygen and heat. In a dynamic high
(P < 0.05) reduction of the droplet size distribution for both the or- pressure system, such as the high pressure homogenizer, tempera-
ganic/aqueous phase ratios. With the increased of pressure to ture rise in the chamber is expected, triggering a loss in the pre-
80 MPa, the energy required to deform the droplets are sufcient pared a-tocopherol in the prepared nanodispersion. In addition,
to overcome the Laplace pressure. These observations showed that the presence of heat, light and oxygen during evaporation process
the intensity of the high shear forces, and the turbulent and/or cav- also contributed to the losses a-tocopherol content. Therefore, a
itations produced during the homogenization process determining loss in the content of a-tocopherol in the sample, after high pres-
the droplet size. These results are in broad agreement with those sure homogenization, is predicted.
reported by Tan and Nakajima (2005). This is a good indication that
droplet size distributions can be controlled by adjusting the 5.4. Stability evaluation of prepared a-tocopherol nanodispersions
homogenization pressure. during storage
Considering both the two ratio of the aqueous:organic phases,
ratio 1:9 showed the smaller droplet size but wider distribution All prepared nanodispersions showed a good stability in term
than ratio 2:8. The main reason for this observation may not be ex- of droplet size distribution. Figs. 1 and 2 show the inuence of
actly claried. Tentatively, the differences might be due to the
organic:aqueous phase variations. Table 4
Becher (1967) showed that the number of times a product Changes in a-tocopherol concentration after the preparation steps (for the
passed through a homogenizer affected the mean droplet size organic:aqueous ratio of 1:9)A
and the droplet size distribution of the nal product. Increasing Pressure Number of After high-pressure After evaporation (mg/l)
of cycle numbers resulted in a decrease in average droplet size (MPa) cycles homogenization (mg/l)
and narrowing the droplet size distribution. However, the observa- ConcentrationB Loss ConcentrationB Loss
tion is not in agreement with our ndings (Table 3). In general, (%) (%)
there is no further decrease in mean droplet size after three 20 1 690 0a 8.6 645 21a 14.6
homogenizing cycles. There was a slight increase in the mean 40 1 650 14b 13.9 625 7ab 17.2
droplet size indicating the maximum dispersity at the given power 60 1 640 14b 15.2 610 28b 19.2
density has been reached. One of the possible explanations is that 80 1 615 7c 18.5 570 14c 24.5
80 2 605 21d 19.9 565 21c 25.2
the droplet size has getting more and more perfect and has reach
80 3 545 21e 27.8 475 7d 37.1
its maximum dispersivity (over-processing), which means that
A
the force and energy required to break the droplets seems to in- Concentrtaion of a-tocopherol after 1st stage homogenization was
755 7.1 mg/l.
crease rather exponentially. Furthermore, temperature can be an B
Each value in the column represents the mean standard deviation of four
important parameter in emulsication affecting both viscosity of analyses from two replications. Means within the column with different super-
the dispersed and continuous phase and also the nature of the scripts are signicantly (P < 0.05) different.
emulsier as a consequence of phase inversion temperature and
its solubility, which can lead to deterioration and would favors
aggregation and consequently affects its stability (Joscelyne and Table 5
Tragardh, 2000; Marie et al., 2002; Floury et al., 2000). Increasing Changes in a-tocopherol concentration after the preparation steps (for the
organic:aqueous ratio of 2:8)A

Table 3 Pressure Number of After high-pressure After evaporation (mg/l)


Characteristics of droplet size distribution of a-tocopherol nanodispersions prepared (MPa) cycles homogenization (mg/l)
with different homogenization cycles and two different ratios of mixture (at 80 MPa)A
ConcentrationB Loss ConcentrationB Loss
Ratio Number of Droplet size, D4,3 Polydispersity index (%) (%)
(organic:aqueous) cycle (nm)B (PI)B
20 1 1750 14a 2.8 1650 36a 8.3
1:9 1 95.8 3.2a 0.43 0.14 40 1 1770 7a 1.7 1620 34a 10.0
2 108.8 0.8b 0.32 0.10 60 1 1690 7b 6.1 1500 72a 16.7
3 109.7 0.6b 0.32 0.05 80 1 1560 14b 13.3 1350 67b 25.0
2:8 1 106.2 2.2a 0.29 0.03 80 2 1460 35b 18.9 1420 67b 21.1
2 107.3 1.5a 0.29 0.01 80 3 1460 21c 18.9 1430 64b 20.6
3 114.9 2.1b 0.24 0.01 A
Concentration of a-tocopherol after 1st stage homogenization was
A
Each value in the table represents the mean SD of four measurements from 1800 2.12 mg/l.
B
two replications. Each value in the column represents the mean standard deviation of four
B
Means within each column with different letters (a, b, or c) are signicantly analyses from two replications. Means within the column with different super-
different from each other (P < 0.05). scripts are signicantly (P < 0.05) different.
208 J.N. Cheong et al. / Journal of Food Engineering 89 (2008) 204209

120 700

Alpha tocopherol concentration (mg/l)


115 600

110 500

105 400
Droplet Size (nm)

100 300
20MPa, 1 cycle
40Mpa, 1 cycle
200
95 60MPa, 1 cycle
20MPa, 1 cycle 80MPa, 1 cycle
40MPa, 1 cycle 100 80MPa, 2 cycles
90
60MPa, 1 cycle 80MPa, 3 cycles
80MPa, 1 cycle 0
85 0 4 8 12
80MPa, 2 cycles
Storage Duration (week)
80MPa, 3 cycles
80
Fig. 3. Changes in a-tocopherol content for a-tocopherol nanodispersions prepared
0 4 8 12
using various homogenization conditions during storage at 4 C (for organic:aque-
Storage Duration (Week) ous phase ratio of 1:9).

Fig. 1. Changes in mean droplet diameter for a-tocopherol nanodispersions during


the duration of storage for organic:aqueous phase ratio 1:9 (12 weeks).
1800

1600
Alpha tocopherol concentration (mg/l)

140
1400

130 1200

1000
120
Droplet size (nm)

800
20MPa, 1 cycle
600 40MPa, 1 cycle
110
60Mpa, 1 cycle
400
80MPa, 1 cycle
100 20MPa, 1 cycle 80MPa, 2 cycles
200
40MPa, 1 cycle 80MPa, 3 cycles
60MPa, 1 cycle 0
90 80MPa, 1 cycle 0 4 8 12
80MPa, 2 cycles Storage Duration (week)
80MPa, 3 cycles
80 Fig. 4. Changes in a-tocopherol content for a-tocopherol nanodispersions prepared
0 4 8 12 using various homogenization conditions during storage at 4 C (for organic:aque-
Storage Duration (Week) ous phase ratio of 2:8).

Fig. 2. Changes in mean droplet diameter for a-tocopherol nanodispersions during


the duration of storage for organic:aqueous phase ratio of 2:8 (12 weeks).
sity of light, and oxidation might have promotes degradation of
content during storage. Another possible explanation would be
storage on the droplet size distribution of a-tocopherol nanodi- the large surface area of the prepared nanodispersions due to the
spersions for 1:9 and 2:8 ratios, respectively. The droplet diameter nanometer range. This may signicantly reduce the stability of
and size distribution are important parameters affecting emulsion the prepared a-tocopherol content.
stability (Saito et al., 2006; Heurtault et al., 2003). Results indicated
that the emulsicationevaporation technique proved to be an ef- 6. Summary
cient way to stabilize the droplet size of the prepared nanodisper-
sions for both ratios. a-Tocopherol nanodispersions prepared from The observations presented in this study conrmed that the
both organic/aqueous ratios were physically stable throughout the nanosized droplets formed using emulsicationevaporation is rel-
12 weeks of storage period at 4 C. atively a simple and effective technique for producing a-tocoph-
However, during storage at 4 C, there was a decrease in the a- erol nanoemulsions in a range of 100120 nm. Droplet size of
tocopherol concentration. Figs. 3 and 4 show the degradation pro- a-tocopherol can be produced in a controlled way by adjusting the
le of a-tocopherol as a function of storage time. The degree of processing parameters pressures and cycle numbers accordingly.
degradation of a-tocopherol content was found to increase with In study, smaller droplet size was obtained for nanodispersion pre-
a decrease in the droplet diameter, with the higher degradation pared using 80 MPa during the emulsication step. This holds true
for the ratio 1:9. Numerous factors had an inuence on the degra- as long as the a-tocopherol/interfacial area ratio is large enough to
dation, which include process factor (temperature, homogeniza- cover the newly formed interface in such a way that recoalescence
tion equipment) and storage condition. The process of breaking are minimized. In the case of homogenizing cycle, recoalescence or
up droplets during emulsication caused the increase in the cham- the so-called over-processing occurs with increasing number of
bers temperature to rise. The exposure of temperature, the inten- homogenizing cycles. The a-tocopherol nanoemulsions showed
J.N. Cheong et al. / Journal of Food Engineering 89 (2008) 204209 209

good physical stability. However, the tocopherol content of the Jafari, S.M., He, Y., Bhandari, B., 2007a. Optimization of nanoemulsions production
by microuidization. European Food Research and Technology 225, 733741.
prepared nanodispersions was signicantly (P < 0.05) reduced dur-
Jafari, S.M., Assadpoor, E., He, Y., Bhandari, B., 2007b. Re-coalescence of emulsion
ing storage. The number of poorly soluble functional lipids are droplets during high-energy emulsication. Food Hydrocolloids, doi:10.1016/
steadily increasing, especially lipids which simultaneously poorly jfoodhyd.2007.09.006.
soluble in water and in non-aqueous media. Therefore, there will Jafari, S.M., He, Y., Bhandari, B., 2007c. Production of sub-micron emulsions by
ultrasound and microuidization techniques. Journal of Food Engineering 82,
be a high demand for formulations overcoming the problem re- 478488.
lated to these solubility problems. Further study will be required Jaiswal, J., Gupta, S.K., Kreuter, J., 2004. Preparation of biodegradable
to develop suitable emulsier system to protect the prepared func- cyclosporinenanoparticles by high-pressure emulsication-solvent
evaporation process. Journal of Controlled Release 96, 169178.
tional lipid of nanodispersion from degradation during prolonged Joscelyne, S.M., Tragardh, G., 2000. Membrane emulsication a literature review.
storage. Journal of Membrane Science 169, 107117.
Jumaa, M., Muller, B.W., 1998. The effect of oil components and homogenization
conditions on the physicochemical properties and stability of parenteral fat
Acknowledgement emulsions. International Journal of Pharmaceutical 163, 8189.
Keck, C.M., Muller, R.H., 2005. Drug nanocrystals of poorly soluble drugs produced
Financial support of this work by Ministry of Science, Technol- by high pressure homogenization. European Journal of Pharmaceutics and
Biopharmaceutics 114.
ogy and Innovation of Malaysia through research Grant IRPA 09- Krause, K.P., Muller, R.H., 2001. Production and characterization of highly
02-04-10059 EAR is gratefully acknowledged. concentrated nanosuspensions by high pressure homogenisation.
International Journal of Pharmaceutics 214, 2124.
Lemos-Senna, E., Wouessidjewe, D., Lesieur, S., Duchene, D., 1998. Preparation of
References
amphiphilic cyclodextrin nanospheres using the emulsication solvent
evaporation method. Inuence of the surfactant on preparation and
Abidi, S.L., 2000. Chromatographic analysis of tocol-derived lipid antioxidants. hydrophobic drug loading. International Journal of Pharmaceutics 170, 119
Journal of Chromatography A 881, 197216. 128.
Becher, P., 1967. Effect of preparative parameters on the initial size distribution Mainardes, R.M., Evangelista, R.C., 2005. PLGA nanoparticles containing
function in oil-in-water emulsions. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science 24, praziquantel: effect of formulation variables on size distribution.
9196. International Journal of Pharmaceutics 290, 137144.
Bouchemal, K., Briancon, S., Perrier, E., Fessi, H., 2004. Nanoemulsion formulation Marie, P., Perrier-Cornet, J.M., Gervais, P., 2002. Inuence of major parameters in
using spontaneous emulsication: solvent, oil and surfactant optimization. emulsication mechanisms using a high-pressure jet. Journal of Food
International journal of pharmaceutics 280, 241251. Engineering 53, 4351.
Constantinides, P.P., Han, J., Davis, S.S., 2006. Advances in the use of tocols as drug Mehnert, W., Mader, K., 2001. Solid lipid nanoparticles: production,
delivery vehicles. Pharmaceutical Research 23, 243255. characterization and applications. Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews 47, 165
Floury, J., Bellettre, J., Legrand, J., Desrumaux, A., 2004a. Analysis of a new high 196.
pressure homogenizer. A study of ow pattern. Chemical Engineering Science Muller, R.H., Peters, K., 1998. Nanosuspensions for the formulation of poorly soluble
59, 843853. drugs. I. Preparation by size-reduction technique. International Journal of
Floury, J., Desrumaux, A., Lardieres, J., 2000. Effect of high-pressure homogenization Pharmaceutics 160, 229237.
on droplet size distributions and rheological properties of model oil-in-water Roesch, R.R., Corredig, M., 2003. Texture and microstructure of emulsions prepared
emulsions. Innovative Food Science and Emerging Technologies 1, 127134. with soy protein concentrate by high-pressure homogenization. LWT 36, 113
Floury, J., Legrand, J., Desrumaux, A., 2004b. Analysis of new type of high pressure 124.
homogenizer. Part B. Study of droplet break-up and recoalescence phenomena.. Sanguansri, P., Augustin, M.A., 2006. Nanoscale materials development a food
Chemical Engineering Science 59, 12851294. industry perspective. Trends in Food Science and Technology 17, 547556.
Helenius, A., McCaslin, D.R., Fries, E., Tanford, C., 1979. Properties of detergents. Saito, M., Yin, L.J., Kobayashi, I., Nakajima, M., 2006. Comparison of stability of
Methods in Enzymology 56, 734749. bovine serum albumin-stabilized emulsions prepared by microchannel
Heurtault, B., Saulnier, P., Pech, P.B., Proust, J-E., Benoit, J-P., 2003. Physico-chemical emulsication and homogenization. Food Hydrocolloids 20, 10201028.
stability of colloidal lipid particles. Biomaterials 24, 42834300. Tadros, T., Izquierdo, P., Esquena, J., Solans, S., 2004. Formation and stability of
Jacobs, C., Kayser, O., Muller, R.H., 2001. Production and characterization of nanoemulsions. Advances in Colloid and interface Science, 303318.
mudadhesive nanosuspensions for the formulation of bupravaquone. Tan, C.P., Nakajima, M., 2005. b-carotene nanodispersions: preparation,
International Journal of Pharmaceutics 24, 2129. characterization and stability evaluation. Food Chemistry 92, 661671.

Vous aimerez peut-être aussi