Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Florea Dinu
Lecture 20: 11/04/2014
European Erasmus Mundus Master Course
Sustainable Constructions
under Natural Hazards and Catastrophic Events
520121-1-2011-1-CZ-ERA MUNDUS-EMMC
Case study :
Tower Center International
Bucharest
Main data
Analysis and design of structure
Progressive collapse resistance
Building main data
Plan 25,5m x 41,5m
Span 7,5m
Bay 7,5m
Storey height 4,0m
Total height 106,3m
Nr. stories 3B + 26S
Foundations Mat foundations + piles, Top-down method
Main structure Partially encased steel columns, steel beams and
bracings, composite slabs
Location The building neighbors the
city centre of Bucharest
Erection March - November 2006
Completion May, 2007
Building main data
Typical floor
3D view
Foundation system
Preliminary study
Constraints: Structural
Infrastructure existing, designed for other structural
system
Bucharest European Capital with the highest seismic risk
Architectural
Interior open space
Bracings position and configuration
Maximum columns size,
belt trusses
Strong beams
Description of the structural system
Columns Cruciform cross sections columns from hot rolled
profiles
MRF bays: cross section columns of 800x800mm
CBF bays: cross section columns of 1000x500mm
Columns were partially encased in reinforced
concrete
S355 steel
ET25
ET23
ET21
ET19
ET17
ET15
longitudinal
Etaj
ET13 transversal
ET11
ET9
ET7
ET5
ET3
ET1
0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25
Deplasare [m]
Wind design
Wind tunnel tests
Rigid model to evaluate the distribution of
pressure coefficients
Aeroelastic model to evaluate the aerodynamic
coefficients
Boundary layer wind tunnel
Reasons
Unusual Shapes
Complex Surroundings (dense constructed area)
To optimize safety of project
Wind design
Wind tunnel tests - Rigid model
Length scale 1:100
Davenports law zg
U ( zg ) G
1.2
1
Experimental
0.8 Alfa=0.23
h/hmax
0.6
0.4
0.2
0
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2
v/vmax
1000
800
Cota [mm]
600
400
200
0
0 0.1 0.2 0.3
3.5
3 =2.75 T3 T2 T1
4.4/T
2.5
2
2
8.8/T
1.5
0.5
T B =0.16 T C =1.6s T D =2
0
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4
Perioada
Period TT,, ssec
Performance based evaluation
Reasons
Code requirement for important buildings
There are some design requirements that are very difficult to
achieve in practice to verify design assumptions
In the design code there are not direct verifications for CPLS
Goals
to evaluate the behaviour of the structure
to verify the plastic mechanism incremental nonlinear
time-history analysis were preformed Incremental
nonlinear time-history analyses were carried out
to validate the seismic performance of the dual-steel
structural system
Three performance objectives (three performance levels
and corresponding hazard levels)
Incremental nonlinear time-history analyses
Performance based evaluation
Three performance levels (limit states) were considered:
serviceability limit state (SLS) Tr = 30 yrs
ultimate limit state (ULS) Tr = 100 yrs
collapse prevention limit state (CPLS) Tr = 475 years
Intensity of earthquake action at the ULS is equal to the
design one (intensity factor = 1.0).
Ground motion intensity at the SLS is reduced to = 0.5
For the CPLS limit state was increased to = 1.5
A set of seven ground motions were used in the analysis,
scaled to match the target (P100-1/2006) spectrum
10
2
8
Spectral Acceleration, m/s
0
0 1 2 3 4
T, s
Performance based evaluation
Plastic hinge distribution for different acceleration levels
ag = 0,08g ag = 0,12g ag = 0,16g ag = 0,20g ag = 0,24g ag = 0,36g
0.09
Conectori 13
52) 0.08
0.07
0.06
0.05
0.04
0.03
0.02
0.01
0.00
0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000
Columns to be lost
1 2 3 4
Column loss scenario
105
100
95
Load C6 C5 C4 C3 C2
C1
-40
Linear response
C3
-60
C4-5
-80
Nonlinear response
-100
-120
0.00 0.10 0.20 0.30 0.40 0.50
Time (sec)
Vertical displacement for C3 and C4-5
scenarios
C3 35 - - -
C4-5 80 0.008 0.012 -
Veiws during construction
Quality control during erection
Quality control during erection
Due to its height,
building construction
tolerances had to be
strictly controlled
Horizontal structural
tolerances were limited
to H/500 (interstory
deviation)
Accurate GPS system to
control the position of
columns
Steel building
GPS system to control the
position