Peer Evaluation suggested template (not mandatory)

Name of evaluator: Raechel Crocetta

Name of person being evaluated: Katie Stewart

Brief overview of the designed product, environment or service:

Design Challenge 7: create a three course menu which would showcase local
produce.

Process and Presen Quality of Comment

Production ted communicatio
Skill /Not n and design
presen process
ted

Satisfactory

absent Lacking or
Excellent

Evidence is yes x The pie charts were

Investigating and Defning

presented that too small to read the

demonstrates writing
the critique of
existing
solutions
through
research and
exploration of
their nature.

In light of what yes x Great analysis of food

is known about produce and
existing availability to the
solutions, and common market.
through survey,
observation Good analysis of
and/or impact on local
questioning, the consumers and
designer show reference to them.
evidence of
comprehensive
research and
analysis of
user/consumer/
audience/partici
 pant needs.

Evidence is x Discussed impact on

presented that local consumers, their
demonstrates families & the local
evaluation of economy. I did not
implications for read any reference to
individuals, the wider community
society and the or global environment.
local and global
environment, (ie carbon footprint
now and in the etc)
future. The design reflects the
The design is making of a menu
shown to board, rather than
respond to these recipes/dishes, but
needs. does support the eco
friendly aspect.

The design of x The design of the

the product deviated from
solution/product/ the above discussions
environment is as the brief was for
presented as a the production of a
design brief. physical menu rather
than the foods/ dishes.

An evaluative x This is where the

Generating and designing

selection of design challenge

options and diverges and changes
alternative into the actual making
design choices of a physical menu
is evidenced in board to read.
the students
documentation. A lot of thought went
This is achieved into the production of
through an this artefact, but I was
examination of thrown as was
specifications expecting to see a list
and of dishes and food
assumptions presentations.
that may include In terms of evaluating
the the production of the
manufacturing menu board the
process and risk following
assessment, as specifications were
well as cultural addressed: The
considerations, Purpose, Aesthetics,
workability, Functional
materials, Characteristics,
aesthetics etc. Form/Shape/Style,
Safety or Moral Issues,
Environmental issues,
cultural
considerations, Scale
of Production, User
Requirements or
Target Market, Budget
Constraints and
Materials, Time and
Resources, Quality of
Design, Product's
Performance,
Product's Price and
Value for Money.

Design choices X Design choice was

demonstrate interesting & creative.
innovative and Would like to have
creative thinking seen the actual
and ideas. product in completion
and used. This may
have highlighted
practical issues
concerning use of the
wood.

The design is of x Deviates from the first

high quality and phase of investigation.
clearly But does support the
responsive to eco-friendly angle
the needs
identified in the
first phase of
investigation.

A final design The product is

specification is described in full, but
presented that not presented.
outlines
purpose, My feeling is
aesthetics, that this would
characteristics, be a time
target market, consuming
cultural menu to create.
considerations, Be quite heavy
and hard to
 price and value manipulate
for money etc.

A final design is
presented.

A production x Production plan for the

plan and menu is presented
timeline is
presented, with
any ad hoc
modifications
that were
Producing and implementing

necessary
during the
production
process.

A reflective, x The first part was

production reflective, however,
journal is there was no
presented, evaluation at the end
documenting to tie the First Phase
the stages in the and Production phase
production together.
process and its
management.

A product, Couldnt be evaluated

process, to full extent as not
environment or finished.
service is
presented and
evaluated.

Evidence is In terms of this

ng Evaluati

presented of clearly defined

insightful exercise I found it very
evaluation and difficult to follow one