Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
At least once in your lifetime you have heard something like You have the right to
remain silent. Whether in a television show or a cool cop movie. That sentence is just the
beginning to the Miranda Rights. The rights were established June 13, 1966. Miranda Rights
provided that suspects must be informed of their specific legal rights when they are placed under
arrest. These rights basically state that a person under arrest have the right to remain silent. The
rights also state that they can get a lawyer. If the person under arrest wanted a lawyer and cannot
afford one, one can be provided for them. They are only stated when police intend to interrogate
the person under arrest while in custody. Ernesto Miranda was a laborer whose conviction on
kidnapping, rape, and armed robbery charges based on his confession under police interrogation.
His during his time with police, his fifth amendment right against self-incrimination had been
violated. When he confessed, those confessions were used against him to sentence him 20 to 30
years in prison. His rights were violated because he did not have the full opportunity to use his
privilege. "To permit a full opportunity to exercise the privilege against self-incrimination, the
accused must be adequately and effectively apprised of his rights and the exercise of those rights
must be fully honored." said Supreme Court's chief justice, Earl Warren.
Police are only required to Mirandize a suspect if they intend to interrogate that person
under custody. Arrests can occur without the Miranda Warning being given. If the police later
decide to interrogate the suspect, the warning must be given at that time. If public safety is an
issue, questions may be asked without the defendant being Mirandized, and any evidence
obtained may be used against the suspect under these circumstances. The Miranda Warning is all
about questioning and being protected from self-incrimination under the Fifth Amendment, not
being arrested.
The person arrested still has to answer questions about their name, age, and address. They
can be searched in order to protect the police officer. If a person under custody confesses before
they a read the Miranda Rights, it cannot be taken into evidence or cannot be used against them
went through trial again without his confession used against him and this time only received 11
years in prison.
If you have been Mirandized you wish to speak to police without an attorney, you can
change your mind at any time and plead the fifth. This means that you no longer wish to answer
questions, or that you have changed your mind and wish to have an attorney with you.
Miranda Rights are not a good way to bring people to justice. In many ways it can
sometimes go wrong. People that have committed a heinous crime can use the rights to make it
harder to for them to be brought to justice. Even if it is obvious that they committed the crime. If
a confession is made before the rights were given to the person under custody it cant be used
against them. This can result in criminals not getting the right amount of time that they deserve
on their sentences to prison, or just not get any time at all. On the other hand, it can also be a
good thing in most cases. Sometimes it can be fair to state the rights because most people are not
aware of what they can do to keep themselves safe especially when innocent. In some cases, a
person might know something that if they do state after they are given their rights then they can
be sentenced to prison. However, they could be innocent in a situation that seems bad. So at the
end of the day it would be better it they kept their mouths closed. I feel like we keep the Miranda
Rights to all people under arrest whether it is obvious or not that the committed a crime for the
fact that everyone is innocent until proven guilty. This is one of the things that it is important to