Criteria A. Task achievement. The Very Good/minor Only fair/some problems/only Poor/major writer provides: good/mostly problems/largely meets meets basic requirements problems/ does no requirements not reach problems/me requirements ets requirements well (1) a clear, balanced and Reasonable Suggested solution needs to comprehensive development of the be developed further. response to all elements besides the elements of the prompt suggested solution.
(2) convincing Problem requires further No evaluation for suggested
development showing development to be solution understanding of the more convincing. complexity of the topic Evaluation of existing solutions should be linked more closely to the scope of the problem eg illegal profiting. (3) a clearly stated stance Problems stance is (in the introduction, the weak due to insufficient evaluation and elaboration, explanation suggested solutions in and evaluation of how particular) commodification of education engenders rising cost and an illegal profiting. Some unclear ideas in the solutions weaken the stance- provide more details to achieve more clarity.
(4) integrated and relevant Some subjective claims
sources which are should be strengthened paraphrased, with sources. synthesized and/or Some unclearly summarized accurately quoted/paraphrased content. (5) clearly documents the In-text citations and citations using the biblio; some errors. required format (APA)
B. Structure and Very Good/minor Only fair/some problems/only Poor/major
development of answer. good/mostly problems/largely meets meets basic requirements problems/ does The writer provides: no requirements not reach problems/me requirements ets requirements well (1) a generic structure The topic sentence appropriate to the task after the intro should (introduction and be presented at the expected stages: start of the first body problem, solutions, paragraph. Mostly fine evaluation) for the rest. (2) a relevant introduction Mostly fine. Present the from general to thesis statement in one specific with a sentence concisely focused thesis grammatically. statement and clear scope (3) an appropriate Present the thesis conclusion relating statement in one back to the thesis sentence for a macro statement and summation. rounding off the essay (4) unified paragraphs with Link topic sentences clear topic sentences and or concluding statements to commodification more explicitly. (5) cohesion built through Some gaps due to thematic progression, insufficient elaboration lexical cohesion and of some ideas. referencing
C. Register and language. Very Good/minor Only fair/some problems/only Poor/major
The writer provides: good/mostly problems/largely meets meets basic requirements problems/ does no requirements not reach problems/me requirements ets requirements well (1) an academic and Reasonable. More abstract tone (through academic tone through the use of complex nominalization can be noun groups and included. nominalization, for Be more concise. example) (2) a range of appropriate Reasonable resources to evaluate Some subjective claims and appraise ideas and can be modified with sources qualifiers.
(3) logical meaning Consider more
relations through sophisticated sentence appropriate use of structures to combine complex, simple ideas more effectively sentences and and concisely. conjunction (4) a text which is virtually Many grammar mistakes. free of grammatical errors (for example: tenses, SVA, syntax/fragments and run-on)