Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Preface
Structural analysis is a key part of design in civil structural engineering. The
structural analysis is the procedure that enables the determination of the
structural response (the internal forces and the movement components)
considering the applied external effects (loads, displacements, thermal) and
the boundary conditions. It was not too long ago that structural analysis
methods were performed manually using the various conventional theory of
structures methods such as the moment distribution method, the slope
deflection method, the matrix method.
Another method of calculation is the finite element method (FEM). The FEM,
developed long time ago from the matrix analysis method, provides high level
of accuracy when used in the structural analysis, but the mathematical
complexity of the method made it impractical for manual analysis. The
development of the computers and the evolution of their capacity in the
previous decades allowed for the integration of the FEM as numerical method
for the use in the structural analysis. Accordingly, the FEM became typically the
base for the modern structural analysis.
The FEM software represent powerful and flexible means to model a wide
range of structures and straining effects on the structures. However, the use of
this powerful means may embrace important peril within the obtained
solutions if some precautions are not properly incorporated in the numerical
model.
2
knowledge and experience in the structural domain. ACI Presidents Memo
Jos M. Izquierdo- Encarnacin 2003 highlighted the importance of the above
concept:
As a rule, a program should be used only if engineers can predict the general
deflection and distribution of moments in the structure prior to obtaining a
solution. The computed solution is used to verify the results previously
predicted by the engineers. If the solution is significantly different from the
prediction, engineers should use the results only if they can satisfactorily
explain the reason for the discrepancy and find it acceptable.
Since most of the software manuals provide guidelines for the use of specific
software assuming the user has already the required theoretical knowledge
and adequate experience, the intent of this manual is to provide simplified
basic guidelines of the structural modeling techniques combining:
However, the user manuals of software do not include all necessary modeling
techniques, tips, and the adequate assumptions for specific cases of study.
3
The aim is to enable the user to construct a numerical model that properly
generate the expected responses of a structure.
Hoping this manual to serve its purpose, it is only the first edition. Your
comments, feedbacks, suggestions and queries are all welcomed to bring out
the best of and enhance the editions yet to come.
4
Contents
1. Introduction 7
2. Degrees of Freedom 8
3. Finite Elements for Structural Modeling 8
4. Global and Local Axis System 10
5. Basic Assumptions 12
6. Meshing of Area Elements (Slabs, Walls, Domes) 14
6.1 Shell Element Shapes 14
6.2 Mesh Refinement 16
6.3 Singular Points 18
7. Modeling of Columns 21
8. Vertical Alignment 21
8.1 Elements of centerlines along the same vertical axis 21
8.2. Use stiff rigid elements 22
8.3. Use of shell FE 23
8.4. Columns embedded or connected to Structural Walls 23
9. Modeling of Structural Walls and Core Walls 24
9.1 Meshing of Walls 25
9.2 Vertical Discontinuity in Walls 25
9.3 Openings in the Structural Walls 26
9.4 Pier assignment of shear walls and core Walls 26
9.5 Horizontal Alignment of Walls 28
9.6 Modeling of Walls and Core-Walls with Frame FE 30
9.7 Boundary Zones of Shear Walls and Core Walls 33
10. Modeling of Beams 35
11. Deep Beam (Wall-Beam) 36
12. Modeling of Floor Slabs 38
5
13. Modeling of Ramps and Stairs 39
14. Story Data 39
15.Lateral Earth Pressure on Basement Walls 40
16. Stiffness Modifiers 41
16.1 Stiffness modifiers for the FE direct results 42
16.2 Stiffness modifiers for the FE indirect shell results 42
17. Fixity level for Seismic Analysis 43
18. Diaphragm behavior of floor slabs 44
19. Connectivity of Vertical to Horizontal Structural Elements 47
20. Seismic additional eccentricity 49
21.Special Considerations For Tall Buildings 49
21.1 Elastic Shortening and Inelastic Time-Dependent
Shortening 49
21.2 P-Delta analysis of buildings 51
6
1. Introduction
The structural study of new or existing structures aims to design or assess the
structures capacity to support the effects of the straining effects as applied
external loads, imposed movements, temperature, acceleration transmitted
from supports.
7
2. Degrees of Freedom
The finite elements that are commonly used for the structural analysis are:
The Frame (or bar) elements with various D.O.F, such as the frame
elements with 1 D.O.F (along translation D.O.F direction) to represent tie
beams, or frame elements with 3 D.O.F (one translation and 2 rotation
D.O.F) to represent beams subjected to non-axial loads within one plane
(local x-z or local x-y), or with 6 D.O.F to represent columns subjected to
axial forces and shear forces along both (X & Y) horizontal directions
8
Frame elements may be also used to represent structural walls (column
with equivalent section), or slabs (the grillage method) where the slab is
represented by a grid of 3 D.O.F frame elements along the length and the
width of the slab.
o The plate elements (shell elements with 3 D.O.F UZ, RX, & RY) are used
to represent slabs.
o The membrane elements (shell elements with 3 D.O.F UX, UY, and RZ)
are used to represent structural elements in the case where the axial
forces represent the major internal force components (as the domes and
arched roof).
9
4. Global and Local Axis System
Figure 5.a. Frame Local Axis Figure 5.b. Shell Local Axis
The local x (or 1) axis is parallel to the element neutral axis, from
origin joint to end joint
The local y ( 2 or 3) axis is the second planar axis, perpendicular to x
axis
The local z (2 or 3) axis is perpendicular to xy (1-2 or 1-3) plane
The right hand rule may also helps in defining the local axis system shown
in the next figure.
10
The analysis results for FE are obtained according to the local axis systems.
For example the internal forces of the frame element parallel to local axis 1
(or x) represents the axial force (FX), V2 (or FZ) the vertical shear, V3 (or
FY) the horizontal shear, T (Mx) the torsion moment, M2 (MZ) the
horizontal flexural moment, M3 (MY)the vertical flexural moment.
For the shell elements F11, F12 and F22 represent the in-plane internal
forces, whereas V11, V12, V22, M11, M22, & M12 represent the out-of-
plane internal forces.
11
The internal forces and stresses and stresses in the above figure may also
be given as:
5. Basic Assumptions
12
Figure 9. Extended Elements at Connections
In the case of large difference between the clear length and the FE
length, rigid elements may be added to account for this difference.
13
6. Meshing of Area Elements (Slabs, Walls, Domes)
The regularity of the FE shapes and their size affect the accuracy of the
analysis results. The most regular FE shapes are the square for quadrangle
FE and the equilateral triangle for the triangular FE. However, it is
recommended to consider the ratio of shape to be 1:2 (the minimum
length to maximum length). This ratio be increased 1:4 max.
14
The next figures show a rectangular (8x8m) solid slab, 20 cm thick meshed
with regular rectangular mesh than with an irregular mesh respectively.
The moment value at the center of area for the regularly meshed slab was
32.7 KNm whereas the irregular mesh generated 30.4 KNm moment at the
same point.
15
6.2 Mesh Refinement
The "mesh refinement" transforms the FE into smaller element sizes and
therefore increases the FE number in a contour area. Theoretically the
smaller the element size (the finer the mesh), the smaller the discretisation
error, and the accuracy of the analysis results increases, but computation
time increases.
The below figure 14 shows the layout of 20cm concrete solid slab
supported by 9 columns with 8.0 m spacing, whereas figures 2, 3, and 4
show the moment maps due to the self weight of the slab meshed with
elements size (1.6x1.6m), (0.4x0.4 m), and (0.1x0.1 m) respectively.
16
Figure 14. Coarse Mesh Moments Map
17
The increase in analysis results with the mesh refinement may be
represent schematically with the next figure 16.
In brief, when the structural study targets the global behavior of the
building -as in Etabs- and the design of the structural elements (except the
floor slabs design), the refinement of the floor slabs mesh is not of major
importance since the results will not be used for the design of the slabs.
The refinement becomes of importance when the study targets the slabs
analysis and design (as in SAFE).
The reentrant corners and sharp corners where the strain becomes
unbounded since the D.O.F are the displacement, and unless limited by
the material model, the stresses will be also infinite.
18
Figure 17. Reentrant Corners and Sharp corners
Extremely high stresses may result from finite element model including
singularity and typically the refinement of mesh around the singular
points increases the stresses. This may raise a problem when the
requirement of stress upper limit (say 70% of the yield stress) is defined.
The common trend of ignoring the small red spots (small zones of
extremely high analysis result values) may not be adequate.
This type of singularity may be avoided considering the following steps:
19
Fillet of the sharp corner (as the perfect sharp corners are rare in
reality).
Removing or modifying the small details that are not important
within the analysis and may generate singularities.
20
Replacing the infinitely rigid supports by elastic sports(springs)
Ignoring the localized results at these red spots points. The analysis
results may be evaluated at a distance from the singular points.
Extremely high stresses may result from finite element model including
singularity and typically the refinement of mesh around the singular points
increases the stresses. This may raise a problem when the requirement of
stress upper limit (say 70% of the yield stress) is defined. The common
trend of ignoring the small red spots (small zones of extremely high
analysis result values) may not be adequate.
7 . Modeling of Columns
8. Vertical Alignment
Vertical elements can be considered aligned if their center lines are at the
same vertical "Z" axis or if their center lines are slightly shifted. Slight
difference in the vertical alignment of the center lines may be ignored in
order to avoid the complexity related to the use of short rigid elements to
connect the CL at the floor levels.
21
Architectural layout (eccentric CL of Columns) Vertical Alignment
22
8.3. Use of shell FE
Compared to the frame FE, higher geometrical and analytical accuracy are
generated with the use of shell elements because more joints are used to
define the column (4 FE instead of 2). However, the design of the column
in this case should not be performed in the same software since shell
elements are considered as shear walls in the design process (as in ETABS).
The part of the core-wall going along the retaining wall may be
considered same as a part of the retaining wall with different thickness
(as previously explained in paragraph 9).
The implanted column need not to be assigned within the shell core-wall
element, as the internal forces in the embedded columns decrease due
to the shell stiffness. The internal forces of the column section above the
shell element commonly govern the design of the column. Typically, the
reinforcement of the critical section at the bottom of the column (at the
link with the shell element) is extended to the floor below in the shell
element.
23
The columns linked to a structural wall may be shifted to the wall center
line (or the wall center line shifted to the columns c.g ), or a rigid stiff
beam element may be used to connect the column c.g to the wall center
line.
Structural (shear) Walls and core-walls are commonly represented by shell FE.
The internal forces generated in these elements include in-plane and out-of-
plane components (Axial and shear forces, torsion and biaxial flexural
moments).
Modeling the shear walls with 6 DOF shell FE, results in in-plan and out of-
plane 6 components of internal forces.
24
9.1 Meshing of Walls
For a higher accuracy of the analysis results, its highly advisable to mesh
wall elements as previously recommended (the single wall shell element is
not automatically meshed by default in Etabs).
25
To ensure the continuity of the wall, shell elements may be assigned auto edge
constraints (Etabs assigns by default auto-edge constraints). A better approach
of this case may be obtained by subdividing the longer element into several
elements as shown in the next figure.
Openings in the structural walls may be ignored if the area of the openings
is smaller than 15% of the wall area at the same floor (an exception is to be
considered for the case of longitudinal or transversal strip openings).
Larger openings shall be included within the wall shell elements.
When shell elements are used for the walls and core-walls, the generated
results are distributed per unit length of the element (forces/ unit length,
moments/unit length...). For design purposes, it may be preferable to
obtain the resultants of wall internal forces as concentrated along the
neutral axis, similarly to the frame FE results. This may be achieved with
different ways in the software (as advanced "reduced results" in Robot
Millennium or as pier results in Etabs....)
The pier function (or the reduced results) generates internal forces
including an important component for the design of the wall section that is
the in-plane moment of the wall (this component is not directly obtained
as FE shell result).
26
The in-plane moment (M3 or MY) is calculated from the summation of the
couples of axial forces generated from the normal stresses of the shell
element (s22 or syy).
Walls and core walls(1) may be assigned same pier label at all floor levels
except for the case were the wall is subdivided in more than one shell
within the same floor (case for large wall opening(2) ), in such case each
shell is assigned a different pier label.
The core wall maybe assigned several pier labels for each shell element.
Whatever is the assignment method of the core wall, the design results will
be the same (the area of reinforcement of the whole pier section =
summation of the reinforcement area of the different piers) since the pier
results -or the reduced results- are generated from the same FE shell
analysis.
27
Figure 25. Pier Assignment
(1)
When a wall is assigned an opening, the shell element shall be
subdivided into elements connected at boundary joints as illustrated
in the next figures.
28
9.5. Horizontal Alignment of walls
The walls and core-wall may have different thicknesses of their parts as
shown in the next figures. These differences lead to discontinuity of the
neutral axis of the wall and the core wall parts and therefore
disconnected wall section and core-wall section when shell elements are
used to represent these structural elements.
29
Walls with variable thickness
30
9.6 Modeling of Walls and Core-Walls with Frame FE
o The first frame element is going along the neutral axis of the core-
wall, and assigned the section properties related to axial stiffness
(namely the area and the modulus of elasticity).
o The second frame is located along the vertical axis of the shear
center and assigned the section properties related to the flexural
and torsion stiffness properties (Ix, Iy, and Iz) 2,3 .
31
The main advantage of using the Frame FE approach is the direct use of the
results (the internal forces) in the design of the wall/ core-wall sections,
whereas the use of shell elements requires followed by a pier assignment
(or reduced results) to generate results similar to the frame. The main
disadvantage is related to the disregard of the warping stresses of the
core-wall section behaving as thin-walled.
(1)
The Center of Gravity (CG) -or the center of area- is structurally defined
as the point of the cross section of an element that causes uniform
stresses and shortening -or elongation- of the element when subjected
to normal forces. When the applied normal force is eccentric with
respect to the CG, it generates different axial shortening (or elongation)
of the section points.
(2)
The Shear Center (SC) is structurally defined as the point of the cross
section of an element that causes lateral displacement for the case of
vertical elements (in-plane displacement of the element cross sections),
when a lateral force is applied at the SC. When the lateral force is
applied eccentrically to the SC the element, sections displace
horizontally and rotate (twist).
32
Figure 33. a. Wall Translation Figure 33. b. Wall Rotation due
due to Force along the S.C to Torsion From Eccentric Force
For the core wall sections the boundary zones may be defined as the
corner zones of the walls intersection as the sections type U-shape, L-
shape, box-shape ... However in the case of complex section shape not all
walls intersection constitutes boundary zones.
33
Figure 35. Boundary Zones of Core Walls
The end zone in core-wall sections may be identified with as the zones
maximum normal stress values within the simplified normal stress
equation for a section subjected to axial force (N), and biaxial moments
(Mx and My) as explained in the following procedure.
- The datum of the stress diagram (line 0f zero stress) is obtained for = 0,
which lead to:
- The extreme values of stresses for a given (N, Mx, and My) are obtained
for the points at the far points of the section on the datum line as shown in
the next figure.
34
Figure 36. Distribution of Normal in Core Walls
Due to the complexity of the design, detailing, and execution of the beam-
column and the beam-wall connections, the beam elements may not be
included in the building numerical. The beams role as supporting elements
35
of the floor slabs may be included in the study of the slabs (using SAFE
software for example).
36
Figure 39. Rigid Frame and Cantilevered Columns Moments
Deep beams (or the wall beams) where the beam depth may cover a
whole floor height. The deep beams may be used to support the loads of
implanted columns
The coupling beams which are beams connecting walls along their
strongest axis of inertia
Beams connecting slab parts of different levels within the same floor.
37
Similar to the case of pier assignment of shear walls, when beams are
represented by shell elements, they are assigned spandrel label to generate
design forces (or as reduced results) at the centerline of the beam.
Figure 41. Local Axis Systems for shell and Spandrel Beams
The internal forces include the in-plane flexural moments (M3 or My) that
are calculated from the summation of the couple of forces generated from
the normal stresses (s11 or sxx), in a way similar to the determination of
the in-plane moment of shear wall assigned as pier.
Floors slabs are represented by thin 6 DOF shell FE. However slabs may be
represented by either:
Plate FE which includes the flexural out of-plane slab inertia in the
numerical analysis. In this condition, no temperature analysis can be
performed since no in-plane D.O.F are involved.
Shell FE, where all degrees of freedom are used to generate in-plane and
out of-plane internal forces (as the PT slabs).
38
13. Modeling of Ramps and Stairs
Ramps and Stairs are type of inclined slabs between story levels. However,
and since they do not affect significantly the gravity loads distribution or
the diaphragm behavior of the floor slabs when buildings are subjected to
lateral forces, an approximation may be considered as flat ramps and
stairs at each floor level.
The story data for the numerical model may be summarized with the
following points:
The story height: is the distance between the floor slabs mid-
thickness, except for the floor directly above foundation where the
story height is considered as the distance from the top of the
foundation to the mid-thickness of the first slab.
39
When the foundation system in not included in the numerical model,
the first floor slab is the cover slab of the foundation level, i.e. if the
building consists of 2 basement floors, the first floor slab assigned is
the basement 1 architectural slab.
Unlike the architectural drawings of floor slabs that shows the slab
geometry ,including shafts, recessed zones, and the vertical
elements above this slab, in some software (as ETABS), slabs are
assigned the vertical elements below -supporting- the slab,
supporting it.
40
16. Stiffness Modifiers
Since the vertical elements (columns and walls) are mostly subjected to
compressive axial forces, they crack less than horizontal elements
(beams and slabs) which are subjected mostly to flexural moments.
The elastic analysis results in:
41
16.1 Stiffness modifiers for the FE direct results
42
be assigned same reduction as for the wall to account for the
reduction of the walls axial capacity.
(2)
Where the floor slabs are assigned rigid diaphragm behavior (no
in-plane moments are generated), m11 (mxx) has no significant
value and may be omitted.
When subjected to lateral earthquake forces, the fixity level of the building
may be defined as the level of maximum internal forces, or the level of
minimum displacements. Based on this definition, the fixity level may not
be necessarily the same as the foundations level, especially for buildings
with basement floors connected to the basement peripheral walls.
43
below the ground level, the axial gravity forces increase, and therefore
the design may be governed by maximum moment at ground level or
maximum axial at lower basement levels.
The effects of the lateral forces are commonly related to location of the
applied forces. This in turn is related to specific geometrical points such
as the center of mass (COM), and the center of rotation (COR).
The Center Of Mass represents the location of the resultant of floor mass
i.e. the center of slab area when the mass is uniformly distributed, and
the related vertical elements masses. The vertical element masses
include half the vertical elements height below the slab, and half the
height above slab as shown in the next figure. The vertical element mass
is considered as the center of gravity of the section.
44
The position of the COM or the COI may be determined considering
arbitrary origin as shown in the next figure 45 for the determination of
the COR.
For the study of the building response to lateral forces as wind pressure,
earthquakes, earth pressure. (Except the temperature effects),
diaphragm behavior is assigned to the floor slabs. The rigid diaphragm
behavior may be explained by the following figure 46.
Points A and B have original coordinates (xA, yA), (xB, yB) with respect
to a reference point O, and the angel AOB. When the floor slab is
subjected to horizontal force and torsion (in-plane) moment, the new
coordinates of A' (xA, yA),B' (xB, yB) and are defined in the deformed
slab.
45
If: xA= xA; yA= yA; xB= xB; yB= yB; and =, than A, B, O (and all
slab points) are moved with the same degrees of freedom (2
displacements UX, UY, and one rotation RZ) and the slab is behaving as
rigid diaphragm.
Another criteria for the use of rigid diaphragm behavior, is when the
maximum lateral displacement in a floor slab exceeds 20 percent the
average displacement at the same floor slab.
46
19. Connectivity of Vertical to Horizontal Structural Elements
47
Figure 48. Vertical to Horizontal Elements connectivity types
48
c) The release of rotation at an element edge cannot be achieved in the
common practice of construction unless special element, like bearing
pads is used. This is due to the requirement of real hinges to reduce
the section moment of inertia of connected element edge to enable
free rotational movements.
49
Figure 55. Shortening of Vertical Elements
50
21.2 P-Delta analysis of buildings
The effect of P-delta analysis may not have important effects on building
unless the stability coefficient ratio "" of the cumulative secondary to
main moment exceeds 0.1. According to the IBC 1617.4.6.2 "" is
determined by the equation:
= Px/VxhsxCd
Where:
The use of the P-Delta analysis should be carefully conducted, and the
related parameters shall be reviewed (which vertical loads have
been involved, the convergence to analysis for the given number of
iterations).
51
Figure 50. Internal Force Diagrams for Linear and Non-Linear Analysis
Where:
qallowable = soil bearing capacity (t/m2)
Es= soil modulus of elasticity
B = the least foundation planar size
= soil poisson's ratio
52
By using the subgrade modulus, the software generates springs
(representing the soil stiffness) with single partially restricted
degree of freedom parallel to the vertical global direction.
The bearing pile is commonly represented by spring with one -or multi-
D.O.F. The spring is assigned stiffness along the vertical and horizontal
directions for pile-foundation hinge connectivity, or springs along the
vertical, horizontal, and rotational directions for the pile-foundation rigid
connectivity type.
The vertical stiffness Kz of the spring represents the least value between
the reinforced concrete capacity and the geotechnical capacity (skin
capacity + end bearing capacity if exist).
53
o Conservatively evaluated as the axial stiffness of the concrete pile
as:
F= Kz allowable Kz = F/ allowable
Where:
F= Apile*conc
Apile = Cross section area of pile = d2/4
d = Pile diameter
conc = Allowable normal stress of concrete assumed limited to 0.25f'c
f'c = Compressive strength of concrete
allowable = Allowable settlement of pile that may be assumed as 0.01d
Kz = d2* 0.25 f'c/(4*0.01d) 20*f'c*d
54
Higher accuracy of pile behavior may be obtained with non-linear Kz
spring.
There are several approximate ways to account for this difference, such
as:
Neglecting the soil vertical stiffness in the case where the piles are
grid-closely-type distributed
Neglecting the soil stiffness in the zones surrounding the piles and
considering full soil stiffness outside these zones in the case of
spaced distribution of piles
25. Warnings
The structure may be unstable without warning massage during the run
of the analysis. This may be due to excessive movement of the structure
or a part of it. It is useful to run a preliminary modal analysis to check
the stability, if there is very large periods than the structure is unstable
to one (or more than one) of the following reasons:
55
Loss of stiffness
Defining of masses
Loss of accuracy
If caused by the loss of stiffness, the mode shape of the large period
indicates where the instability occurs.
Case1
Figure
52. Single Span with by Sliding Supports
Case2
56
Case3
57
26. Import of geometrical data from AutoCAD Files
The geometrical structural data that are used for the numerical model
may be prepared from the architectural drawings following the below
recommended steps:
Four new layers are to be created in the AutoCAD architectural files for
th2e: slabs (S-Slab), Walls (S-Wall), Columns (S-Column), and Openings
(S-Opening).
The new structure layers are used to create the contour of the
corresponding elements i.e. Slabs, Walls, Columns, and Openings. All
contour lines are to be closed polyline type.
Each floor slab is exported into a new file with a reference point (same
horizontal coordinates point at all levels) at origin (coordinates 0, 0, 0).
The reference point should be architecturally fixed such as an inner
corner of the lift shaft or staircase.
58
Figure 58. Slab on Grade
59
Contact mail:
ytemsah@hotmail.com
60
61