Vous êtes sur la page 1sur 20

04-11-17-One of The People of the lawful state, Colorado: Attention: Public officers and

fiduciaries... The people, your employers are speaking

Date: April 10, 2017

From the Desk of Steven Duane Curry; Executor-in-Probate


American State National; 'Sui Juris,' Next Friend
21250 Dave Wood Road
Montrose, Colorado [81403]
970-316-1361

To: CYTHIA COFFMAN; Colorado Attorney General


CC: ROBERT S. SHAPIRO; First Assistant Attorney General
% Kenneth King; Criminal Investigator; Deputy Attorney General
1300 Broadway, 9th Floor
Denver, CO 80203
720-508-6000

Re: Presumption of Indictment of "We the Peoples Common Law Jury"

Subject: Commercial Affidavit & Notice of Non-Consent, Protest & Objection

Greetings, Cythia & Robert;

With all due respect, Madam & Sir, as 'Elected' State Public Officials, and
as the Chief Law Enforcement Officers of the State, next to Governor
Hickenlooper, the following Commercial Affidavit & Notice of Non-Consent &
Objection, is created & constructed, not with argument, anger, rancor, threat, or
contempt, but as a genuine Declaration & Statement of the Facts, the Truth, the
whole Truth, and nothing but the Truth. As such, any & all responses, protests,
or rebuttals of these Facts & Truths, MUST be made point-for-point, article-for-
article, including all attachments & links, under Oath, under Penalty of Perjury,
and returned to me within 10 days time of your receipt of this electronic/email
message. For your ease & convenience, each point is constructed in the form of
a question, and is numbered sequentially.

CAUTION: Failure to respond, protest, or rebut these Facts & Truths within
the required time period, SHALL result in your commercial acquiescence, your
Presented as a courtesy of the scannedretina arnie@arnierosner.com 714-964-4056 Page - 1
The Scanned Retina; A Private Citizen Advocacy Membership Group, dedicated to Securing
Lawful Constitutional Compliance for all Americans.

Things about which you did not darethink-


04-11-17-One of The People of the lawful state, Colorado: Attention: Public officers and
fiduciaries... The people, your employers are speaking

acceptance, and your agreement, to ALL terms & conditions contained herein,
and that, the Facts & Truths are to be considered the absolute Facts & Truths of
the matter, and that, they are to be known to all men as "LAWFUL
JUDGEMENTS IN COMMERCE," with ALL statutes, codes, and 'colors of law," no
longer WITHSTANDING!

This Commercial Affidavit & Notice of Non-Consent, Protest & Objection is to be


filed, and set to both the Public & Private sides the Court of Record, and in all
the following active cases;

1 Stephen Nalty; Case No.#16CR001


2 Steven Byfield; Case No.#16CR001
3 Janis Blease; Case No.#16CR001
4 Larry Goodman; Case No.#16CR001
5 Brian Baylog; Case No.#16CR001
6 Harlan Smith; Case No.#16CR001
7 Bruce Ducette; Case No.#16CR001
8 David Coffelt; Case No.#16CR001

Having reviewed & studied your recently signed Presumption of Indictment"


against several members of "We the People of Colorado Common Law Jury," and
others known & unknown, I have the following questions, concerns, protests, and
objections.Please answer these 59 simple queries & interrogatories, honestly &
sincerely. This should not take but a few minutes of your time, but, do take
your time, as many lives are at stake!

1. Were you elected to your public offices by the People of Colorado?


Yes? or No?

2. If "No," were you selected, or appointed by any particular corporate-body-


politic?
Yes? or No?

3. If "Yes," who, or what corporate-body-politic selected, or appointed you to


your public office?
Presented as a courtesy of the scannedretina arnie@arnierosner.com 714-964-4056 Page - 2
The Scanned Retina; A Private Citizen Advocacy Membership Group, dedicated to Securing
Lawful Constitutional Compliance for all Americans.

Things about which you did not darethink-


04-11-17-One of The People of the lawful state, Colorado: Attention: Public officers and
fiduciaries... The people, your employers are speaking

4. Are you an officer, agent, or member, of the American BAR Association? Yes?
or No?

5. Are you an officer, agent, or member, of the Colorado BAR Association? Yes?
or No? [Before responding, see http://www.goldwaterinstitute.org/en/work/
topics/constitutional-rights/free-speech/goldwater-institute-sues-state-bars-are-
unconstitu/

6. If you are an officer, agent, or member, of the American BAR Association, do


you consider it a 'Conflict of Interest' to hold a government office of the State
of Colorado? Yes? or No? [See A.B.A. Rules of Professional Conduct & Ethics,
Rule #4, before answering].

7. Are you aware of the Original & Organic XIII Amendment of the US
Constitution, which prohibits BAR members from holding Public Office of the
People's government? Yes? or No? [Before responding, see http://src-fla.us/
index.php/understanding-the-fraud/14-sample-data-articles/107-judge-drake-5

8. Are you aware of the "Titles of Nobility Act"? Yes? or No?

9. Are you aware of the US Supreme Court Case of 1803 known as Marbury v.
Madison? Yes? or No?

10. Are you familiar with the Judiciary Act of 1789? Yes? or No?

11. Under the Judiciary Act of 1789, what is the maximum penalty &
punishment one can face having committed any crime? a. Life in Prison. b. 20
years in prison. c. 30 Stripes. d. Six months imprisonment.

12. What do the i.n.i.t.i.a.l.s. "B.A.R." stand for?

13. Would it surprise you to learn, that the i.n.i.t.i.a.l.s. "B.A.R." stands for the
"British Accreditation Regency?" Yes? or No? [See above link before
responding].
Presented as a courtesy of the scannedretina arnie@arnierosner.com 714-964-4056 Page - 3
The Scanned Retina; A Private Citizen Advocacy Membership Group, dedicated to Securing
Lawful Constitutional Compliance for all Americans.

Things about which you did not darethink-


04-11-17-One of The People of the lawful state, Colorado: Attention: Public officers and
fiduciaries... The people, your employers are speaking

14. As an agent, officer, and member for a private foreign corporation, a.k.a. the
"B.A.R.", are you Legislatively-authorized, under the US Supreme Court decision
over Marbury v. Madison, the "Titles of Nobility Act," or the State & US
Constitutions, to take an Oath of Office to support & defend the State, or US
Constitution, and/or to hold an elected Public Office of the People's American
State government? Yes? or No?

15. If "Yes" on #14, would you agree, then, that State government operates
ONLYby the "Consent of the Governed"? Yes? or No?

16. Would you agree with the following writ, order, decision, and ruling of the
US Supreme Court in 1906?

"The "individual" may stand upon "his Constitutional Rights" as a CITIZEN. He is


entitled to carry on his "private" business in his own way. "His power to contract
is unlimited." He owes no duty to the State or to his neighbors to divulge his
business, or to open his doors to an investigation, so far as it may tend to incriminate
him. He owes no duty to the State, since he receives nothing therefrom, beyond the
protection of his life and property. "His rights" are such as "existed" by the Law of
the Land (Common Law) "long antecedent" to the organization of the State", and
can only be taken from him by "due process of law", and "in accordance with the
Constitution." "He owes nothing" to the public so long as he does not trespass upon
their rights." HALE V. HENKEL 201 U.S. 43 at 89 (1906). Yes? or No?
17. With regard to Hale v. Henkel, and Marbury v. Madison, do you consider
yourself a "CITIZEN"? Yes? or No? If Yes, please explain how you justify your
status.
18. With the US Supreme Court having 'exclusive' & 'original jurisdiction' over all
commercial, civil & criminal matters of the united States, are you required to be
in full compliance with their rulings, writs, orders, judgements, and decrees?
Yes? or No? [Before answering, please consult 18 USC 401 & 402].

19. Based on Hale v. Henkel, would you agree, that "individuals" are genuinely
defined as Natural, Living-born, flesh & blood beings, and NOT as fictions,
associations, incorporations, or corporations? Yes? or No?
Presented as a courtesy of the scannedretina arnie@arnierosner.com 714-964-4056 Page - 4
The Scanned Retina; A Private Citizen Advocacy Membership Group, dedicated to Securing
Lawful Constitutional Compliance for all Americans.

Things about which you did not darethink-


04-11-17-One of The People of the lawful state, Colorado: Attention: Public officers and
fiduciaries... The people, your employers are speaking

20. Would you agree, then, that, "individuals" have certain, reserved, protected,
and unalienable rights under the State & US Constitutions? Yes? or No?

21. Given the ruling of Hale v. Henkel, do you consider the "State" to be a
corporation, an incorporation, or an individual? Please choose one.

22. Would you agree, that corporations, being fictions of the mind, and not
individual living-born beings, can ONLY engage, and Contract, with other fictions,
and/or corporations? Yes? or No? Before responding, please consult the term,
corporation, in Blacks Law Dictionary, 8th Edition].

23. Would you also agree, then, that the "individual living-born beings" you
ordered to be arrested, are NOT corporations, incorporations, or fictions? Yes? or
No?

24. In ALL Commercial Contracts, is it required that ALL parties "CONSENT" to


the CONTRACT? Yes? or No?

25. DoALL the State & County Courts you administer over as the State's Chief
Law Enforcement Agents & Prosecutors, offer CORPORATE CONTRACTS to
individual living-born beings? Yes? or No?

26. If "Yes" on #25, how do you manage to create corporations, incorporations,


and fictions, out of individual living-born beings, without their knowledgeable &
free willed-Consent, and without violating the individual's Constitutional rights,
and without violating your fiduciary obligations & duties under Hale v. Henkel?
Please be specific!

27. As elected "CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICERS" of the STATE, and serving as a


CORPORATE JUDICIAL OFFICERS for & of the COURTS, at the very same time,
how do you justify & rectify your duel-OFFICE functions, with this clear &
questionable 'Conflict of interest', in re-inventing, re-creating, and/or re-
presenting, the individuals you ordered to have arrested & charged? Please
be specific?
Presented as a courtesy of the scannedretina arnie@arnierosner.com 714-964-4056 Page - 5
The Scanned Retina; A Private Citizen Advocacy Membership Group, dedicated to Securing
Lawful Constitutional Compliance for all Americans.

Things about which you did not darethink-


04-11-17-One of The People of the lawful state, Colorado: Attention: Public officers and
fiduciaries... The people, your employers are speaking

28. In order to Commercially CONTRACT with the individual living-born beings


you ordered to have arrested, do you change their living-born status to that of
a "dead person"? Yes? or No? If Yes, is this Action NOT the legal definition
of MURDER? Yes? or No?

29. On each count of the "Presumption of Indictment" against each "dead person,"
does each count require a separate Contract for each "dead person" & "dead
estate"? Yes? or No?

30. Have you, as the Chief Prosecutors against the "dead persons" you are
charging, and offering to CONTRACT with, produced, to the record, and served
upon these "dead persons," a Bid Bond, a Performance Bond, or a Payment
Bond, for each count levied against them? Yes? or No? If Yes, are these
Bonds in full compliance with the DOJs recent directive regarding excessive
bonds, and civil rights violations? [Before responding, please consult http://
www.abajournal.com/news/article/
justice_department_warns_local_courts_about_illegal_enforcement_of_fees_an
d/].

31. Would you agree, that; "No Bond means no responsibility, means no power of
Official signature, means no real corporate political power and means no privilege to
operate statutes as the corporate vehicle." Yes? or No? [Before responding, please
see the following;]

Note: The following Maxims of Law clearly explains why those individuals, who
are currently incarcerated, felt they had 'probable cause,' and why they had
chosen to exercise their Commercial & Constitutional rights to issue Bills of
Exchange against these malfeasant public & judicial officers, a.k.a. their
accusers in your Presumption of Indictment.

[PUBLIC HAZARD BONDING OF CORPORATE AGENT:


1. "All officials are required by Federal, State and Municipal Law to provide the
name, address and telephone number of their public hazard and malpractice bonding
company, the policy number of the bond and if required, a copy of the policy
Presented as a courtesy of the scannedretina arnie@arnierosner.com 714-964-4056 Page - 6
The Scanned Retina; A Private Citizen Advocacy Membership Group, dedicated to Securing
Lawful Constitutional Compliance for all Americans.

Things about which you did not darethink-


04-11-17-One of The People of the lawful state, Colorado: Attention: Public officers and
fiduciaries... The people, your employers are speaking

describing the bonding coverage of their specific job performance."


2. "Failure to provide this information constitutes corporate and limited liability
insurance fraud (15 USC) and is prim-a-facie evidence and grounds to impose a lien
upon the official, personally, to secure their public oath and service of office"].
32. If you have produced & issued any of the Bonds mentioned above to the
record, and you have served these Bonds upon the individual living-born beings"
you arrested, who have you made the Surety for these bonds? The individual?
or The "Dead Person? Remember; as a CORPORATE agent, or officer, you
CANNOT, under any circumstances, or Commercial Law, engage, or CONTRACT, to
anything other than another Corporation! Agreed? Yes? or No?

33. With each Bond for each Count, and for each "Dead Person," have you
completed a separate recording to the I.R.S. with a Form #1099OID for each?
Yes? or No?

34. Would you agree, that; "Municipal corporations, which include cities, counties,
states and national governments, have no commercial reality without bonding of the
entity, its vehicle (statutes), and its effects (the execution of its rulings)." Yes? or
No?

35. Are you familiar with the Bill of Exchange Act of 1882? Yes? or No?

36. Who is authorized to use a Bill of Exchange? a. ONLY Attorneys. b. ONLY


Judges. c. ONLY Attorneys General. d. Anyone. e. ONLY BAR members. If you
answered d., you would be correct!

37. What is a Promissory Note? Please be specific!

38. Who can create & issue a Promissory Note? Please be specific!

39. Would you agree, then, that; "Under the Bill of Exchange Act 1882, a
Promissory Note is to be treated as cash. This was also confirmed by Lord Denning, a
High Court Judge, during a precedent High Court judgment in 1969. The principle is
that a bill, cheque or note is given and taken in payment as so much cash, and not
as merely given a right of action for the creditor to litigate a counterclaim (see
Presented as a courtesy of the scannedretina arnie@arnierosner.com 714-964-4056 Page - 7
The Scanned Retina; A Private Citizen Advocacy Membership Group, dedicated to Securing
Lawful Constitutional Compliance for all Americans.

Things about which you did not darethink-


04-11-17-One of The People of the lawful state, Colorado: Attention: Public officers and
fiduciaries... The people, your employers are speaking

Jackson v Murphy [1887] 4 T.L.R. 92)." Yes? or No?

40. If "Yes" on #39, why have the judges, prosecutors, Sheriffs, and other
CORPORATE agents, officers, and members, who are alleging injury in your
Presumption of Indictment, and whom have sought out your prosecutorial
assistance as a Chief Executive Officer, and a Judicial Officer, at the same time,
in arresting, prosecuting, and retaliating against these "dead persons,"
NOTsimply have 'accepted for value' the Bills of Exchange served upon them
through lawful civil processes? Please answer in detail!

41. Would you agree, then, that the individual living-beings you ordered
arrested were never genuinely intent on injuring other individual living beings,
but rather seeking lawful CIVIL remedy & recourse against the CORPORATE
agents, officers, and members of private foreign corporate fictions, who had
attacked them in the first place, using fabricated & fictitious Oaths & Bonds,
along with using foreign statutes, codes, and colors of law, all in an attempt to
deprive We the People of Colorado of their reserved & protected Commercial &
Constitutional rights granted them at the moment of their Birth? Agree? Yes?
or No?

42. In NOThaving accepted the numerous Affidavits, Notices, Bills of Exchange,


and the Peoples lawful foreclosures on their false & fabricated Oaths of Office,
a.k.a. Promissory Notes, and all having gone into silence & acquiescence, would
you agree, that these agents, falsely alleging injury as CORPORATE fictions,
were, under Commercial Law, in actual & genuine Commercial Dishonor & Default
on their Oaths of Office, and on their Official Promissories? Yes? or No?

43. Having mis-represented & charged these individual Living-born men & women
as "DEAD PERSONS," or "DEAD & ABANDONED ESTATES," which, by the way, are
pure acts of Personage & Barratry, was your genuine intent to induce, coerce,
threaten, and intimidate these individual living-born beings, by military force of
arms, their written CONSENT with their Living signatures on your Bid,
Performance, and Payment Bonds, and by these measures of duress, to access
their unlimited commercial estates, which were Contracted without their
knowledge, or Consent; all with the corporate issuance of their Live Birth
Presented as a courtesy of the scannedretina arnie@arnierosner.com 714-964-4056 Page - 8
The Scanned Retina; A Private Citizen Advocacy Membership Group, dedicated to Securing
Lawful Constitutional Compliance for all Americans.

Things about which you did not darethink-


04-11-17-One of The People of the lawful state, Colorado: Attention: Public officers and
fiduciaries... The people, your employers are speaking

Certificates & their unlimited funds in their Cestue Que Vie Accounts, along with
the intent of seizing all other entitlements these individuals had inherited, and
which had been granted them at the moment of their Births? Yes? or No?
[Before responding, please consider that, Fraud vitiates ALL
Contracts!.....including their Live Birth Certificates, of which these individuals
had NOT knowingly Consented to!]

44. If "No" on #43, please explain, in detail, your intentions and why you have
found it necessary to kidnap, arrest, transport, incarcerate, and imprison these
individual living beings, all for exercising their Commercial & Constitutional
rights of "SELF-DEFENSE" against a clearly corrupt system of corporate theft by
deception, tyranny & oppression, and to exercise their reserved & unalienable
rights to seek & receive lawful remedy & recourse for their injuries; all in using
the very same commercial processes you, and the courts, use against the People
every day, and in each & every case. Please explain the term "Equity." Please
explain, too, if you will, the terms, Extortion, and Racketeering, as they relate
to Courts issuances of Bid Bonds, Performance Bonds, and Payment Bonds.

1 Do you understand, that anyone can create & issue a Promissory Note, or a Bill
of Exchange to pay their debts, but if refused, the corporation in question
is technically breaking the law! Yes? or No? [Before responding, please
consider the following;

U.C.C. 3-603 TENDER OF PAYMENT:

1 If tender of payment of an obligation to pay an instrument is made to a person


entitled to enforce the instrument, the effect of tender is governed by
principles of law applicable to tender of payment under a simple contract.
[See Truth & Lending Act, (T.I.L.A.), Regulation #Z].

1 If tender of payment of an obligation to pay an instrument is made to a person


entitled to enforce the instrument and the tender is refused, there is
discharge, to the extent of the amount of the tender of the obligation of an
endorser accommodation party having a right of recourse with respect to the
obligation to which the tender relates.
Presented as a courtesy of the scannedretina arnie@arnierosner.com 714-964-4056 Page - 9
The Scanned Retina; A Private Citizen Advocacy Membership Group, dedicated to Securing
Lawful Constitutional Compliance for all Americans.

Things about which you did not darethink-


04-11-17-One of The People of the lawful state, Colorado: Attention: Public officers and
fiduciaries... The people, your employers are speaking

1 If tender of payment of an amount due on an instrument is made to a person


entitled to enforce the instrument, the obligation of the obligor to pay
interest after the due date on the amount tendered is discharged. If
presentment is required with respect to an instrument and the obligor is
able and ready to pay on the due date at every place of payment stated
in the instrument, the obligor is deemed to have made tender of payment
on the due date to the person entitled to enforce the instrument.

46. As to your living signature on the last page of the "Presumption of


Indictment," I have to ask where is the signature, and the stamp of any Federal
District Court prosecutor? I ask this, because the warrants for the seizures &
arrests of these living-born individuals were served by agents & officers of the
Federal Bureau of Investigation. Am I correct? Yes? or No?

47. If "Yes" on #46, it appears that these Federal Agents & Officers were
clearly operating well outside of their Federal jurisdiction, power, and authority,
which extends only to the Boundary Stones of the political enclave, or
embassy, of their private, foreign, corporate State, known as Washington, D.C..
These agents & officers of the United States of America, Inc., then, have NEVER
been given Legislative Authority of the governed to operate within the
boundaries of any of other 50 States united. Correct? Yes? or No? [Before
responding, please review https://mainerepublicemailalert.com/2017/03/30/
federal-tax-case-shows-evidence-the-u-s-legal-system-is-a-fraud-2/ ].

48. In your requesting that these Federal agents & officers serve your warrants
for the seizures & arrests of these individual Living-born men & women, it
appears this act was in clear violation of these individuals' rights under the IV
& V Amendments, as you did NOT, as an elected State Executive Officer, have
the Legislative power, or the Consent of the governed, to have authorized the
use of military force, or the establishment of a foreign State embassy within
the lawful political, territorial, and geographical boundaries of the State of
Colorado. Am I correct? Yes? or No?

49. If you are genuinely & sincerely operating under the State & US
Presented as a courtesy of the scannedretina arnie@arnierosner.com 714-964-4056 Page - 10
The Scanned Retina; A Private Citizen Advocacy Membership Group, dedicated to Securing
Lawful Constitutional Compliance for all Americans.

Things about which you did not darethink-


04-11-17-One of The People of the lawful state, Colorado: Attention: Public officers and
fiduciaries... The people, your employers are speaking

Constitutions, and under the General Laws of Colorado, as your Oaths of Office
require, why does your office, and ALLState & County courts in Colorado under
your Administration as elected Chief Executive Officers, fly & display a gold-
trimmed American Flag, as this Flag is, under the International Law of Flags,
recognized ONLY as an Admiralty, Maritime, Tribunal, and Courts Martial Flag,
which under POTUS Dwight D. Eisenhower's Executive Order #108304 of August
21, 1959, can ONLY be displayed & flown inside a Military facility, ceremony, or
operation? [See attached Executive Order].

50. Please explain, as well, why you, and the Governor, fly & display a gold-
trimmed Colorado State Flag, when this Flag, with its gold & yellow trim, is also
clearly in violation of the International Law of Flags, and the State
Constitution.The answer, if I may, is that you CANNOT lawfully establish
personal, subject matter, or territorial jurisdiction over any Living-born
American State Nationals who live and inhabit the Land in Colorado, and fly &
display a private, foreign, corporate gold-trimmed flag at the same time, without
first violating your Oath of Office, and thus breaching your Good Faith
CONTRACT with We the People of Colorado, who elected you to your Public
Offices! Would you agree? Yes? or No?

51. I thank you, in advance, Mrs. Coffman, and Mr. Shapiro, for your cooperation
& agreement in having ALL the spurious, false, and fabricated charges &
allegations against these living-born individuals dismissed with great prejudice,
as they were, "at Dawn's early light", merely & simply acting out in Self-
Defense& Protection of their peaceful communities against the oppression &
tyranny of a private, foreign, military invasion.It was, after all, their obligation
& duty to report, and to repulse, in any manner possible, a hostile invasion &
occupation of their Land by aforeign military power, pursuant 18 USC 3 & 4!

52. With all due respect, Madam & Sir, you CANNOT, under any circumstances,
engage, contract, or hold these non-militant, non-incorporated, non-consenting,
well-intentioned, albeit "overly-Patriotic & zealously committed" American State
National individuals to account for exercising their God-given rights to defend
themselves, and their rights & entitlements to all Commercial & Constitutional
remedies & recourses available to them under Law for the injuries they, and
Presented as a courtesy of the scannedretina arnie@arnierosner.com 714-964-4056 Page - 11
The Scanned Retina; A Private Citizen Advocacy Membership Group, dedicated to Securing
Lawful Constitutional Compliance for all Americans.

Things about which you did not darethink-


04-11-17-One of The People of the lawful state, Colorado: Attention: Public officers and
fiduciaries... The people, your employers are speaking

their assemblies & communities have suffered under the BARs Military Courts
Martial! Agree? Yes? or No?

53. These individual 'advocates for peace', contrary to the pervasive dark &
elitist rhetoric of their accusers, are NOT "War Criminals," or "Domestic
Terrorists." These titles, it would appear, more correctly & genuinely belong to
any corporation, association, collective, or other fictional creations of the
darkness, who believe they can operate in secret, and operate above & outside
the Law of the Land! I will trust that you know who these entities are, as
they continue to demonstrate & flaunt their lack of honor, character, integrity,
ethics, morals, and/or conscience! Yes? or No?

54. Would you not agree, Madam & Sir, that "We the People,"CANNOT, under
any circumstances, be expected to Consent, en-Trust, or contract our lives,
freedoms, liberties, pursuits, or our properties, to any form of corporate
government that exhibits such foul, corrosive, and corruptive incivility! This is,
after all, a "Nation of Laws," and as your newSuperior, Neil Gorsuch, recently
stated, "No man is above the Law"! Agreed? Yes? or No? [Before responding,
please see this link @ http://freebeacon.com/issues/mr-social-security-indicted-
disability-fraud/].

55. On a person-al note, Cynthia & Robert, I must fervently protest & object to
my being mis-represented & mis-characterized on Page #29 of the "presumption
of"Indictment"by your Grand Jury as a "Justice"! I am NOT a "Justice" ("Just-
US")! That is just one of many copyrighted titles you folks seem to enjoy using,
and I will not have it inferred, or suggested, that I hold such a corporate office
without my knowledgeable consent, or that I have, somehow, violated the
corporations' copyrighted property! [See attached Universal Declaration of
Human Rights, Articles 1-30].
I am, quite simply, an individual Judge on the Land, as is my Universal
right to judge all things of which I am cognizant & competent to judge, such as
judging distance, judging the area of a hector of land, judging characters,
judging how far I can travel in a day, judging how much I can safely eat, or
exercise, judging the differences of day & night, judging between right & wrong,
judging when enough lies have been told, and judging when enough lives have
Presented as a courtesy of the scannedretina arnie@arnierosner.com 714-964-4056 Page - 12
The Scanned Retina; A Private Citizen Advocacy Membership Group, dedicated to Securing
Lawful Constitutional Compliance for all Americans.

Things about which you did not darethink-


04-11-17-One of The People of the lawful state, Colorado: Attention: Public officers and
fiduciaries... The people, your employers are speaking

been lost to war! As a Vietnam Combat Veteran, I have first-hand knowledge &
experience of the pain, suffering, and the utter uselessness of war, and all
unnecessary deaths associated with it!
After many years of living in this "Spiritual & Mental Experiment," I'm quite
certain I know who I am, and I know, all too well, that I am very much a Spirit
that currently embodies a Living-born human body on the Land. This I well
understand, given my inherited abilities to critically think & reason, my ability
to bleed, my frustrations, my many disappointments, my heartaches, my failures,
and my love, my commitment, and my obligations & duties to my fellow man to
speak for them when they may, at the moment, be incarcerated, or
incapacitated, and not in a position of power to speak for themselves!.......Only
human, living-born, flesh & blood beings have this capacity for caring!
Corporations, and other fictions of the mind, CANNOT!! Agreed? Yes? or No?
It is, after all, a genuine & common American right & tradition to reach out
as a Next Friend, and to help my fellow man when their lives are in danger, or
when they are under strain & duress not of their making! He, or she, is
welcomed to accept my assistance of counsel, or not, but I CANNOT force them
to into any contract not of their choosing, any more than you can! I know that
you know this! Any & all presumptions to contract, and ALL gratuitous bailments
& contracts, then, that areNOT of mutual benefit, are clearly NULLITIES, and
they are VOID upon the very first contractual defect at their creation &
inception! Agreed? Yes? or No?

1 Should I find, that this Presumption of Indictment has NOT been NULLIFIED
& VOIDED, as it is REQUIRED to be under Law, but rather enlarged to
include me, and/or others known, or unknown, I SHALL, without hesitation,
or delay, categorically deny, reject, and protest all such charges,
allegations, and inferences, levied by any corporate agent, officer, or
prosecutor, of any of the 50 States, as I remain a Federally-registered
crime victim, witness, and informant against the A.B.A., ET AL, pursuant
18 USC #3771. Should there be any writ, ruling, decision, or warrant
issued by any Corporate officer, or Administrative Clerk, agent, or
contractor, without due process, I SHALL accept for value any such writ,
and demand that these writs be set-off & discharged without any further
Presented as a courtesy of the scannedretina arnie@arnierosner.com 714-964-4056 Page - 13
The Scanned Retina; A Private Citizen Advocacy Membership Group, dedicated to Securing
Lawful Constitutional Compliance for all Americans.

Things about which you did not darethink-


04-11-17-One of The People of the lawful state, Colorado: Attention: Public officers and
fiduciaries... The people, your employers are speaking

sanction, penalty, denial, delay, or obstruction, pursuant 15 USC 1 & 2.


Do I have your understanding on this matter? Yes? or No? Thank you!

1 On this subject, Madam & Sir, I would like to point out, as well, that the
International Commercial Obligation Lien that was filed on behalf of We
the People against the A.B.A., and D.O.J., on October 16, 2015, went un-
protested, un-argued, and un-rebutted, by every single officer, agent, and
member of the A.B.A., and the D.O.J., for a period of Ninety (90) Days
time. On January 17, 2016, this Lien became Truth & Judgment in
Commerce, based on their silence & acquiescence. Within this Lien, all
those individual living-born beings currently under your care & custody,
were also represented as crime victims, witnesses, and informants against
the A.B.A., and the D.O.J.. [NOTICE WAS PROPERLY & LAWFULLY MADE
TO THE PRINCIPALS AS IT WAS TO ALL AGENTS. NOTICE WAS
PROPERLY & LAWFULLY MADE TO ALL AGENTS AS IT WAS MADE TO THE
PRINCIPALS]. Your recent Presumption of Indictment, then, was
constructed in clear breach, and in clear contradiction to your earlier
acceptance & agreement to the terms & conditions set forth in this
Commercial Lien, and that, your recent actions against these individual
crime victims, witnesses, and informants, MUST be remedied by their
immediate release. Agreed? Yes? or No?

1 I would add, too, that this International Commercial Obligation Lien is now in
commercial use in many Nations around the world, with the purpose of
Noticing the International Bar of their criminal trespasses &
transgressions against humanity. You must know, too, that this Lien was
constructed, NOT as a way to extort monies from individual BAR officers,
agents, and members, but to induce & force their dissolution should they
fail to be in full compliance with the Law of Nations, and that, they act
within the Four Corners of every Nations Constitution with which they
Presume to have CONTRACT, or an Embassy, and all without usurpation,
or military occupation of these Nation States governments. Do I have
your understanding? Yes? or No? Thank You!

Inasmuch, and as scholars of Law, yourselves, you know as well as I do, that the
Presented as a courtesy of the scannedretina arnie@arnierosner.com 714-964-4056 Page - 14
The Scanned Retina; A Private Citizen Advocacy Membership Group, dedicated to Securing
Lawful Constitutional Compliance for all Americans.

Things about which you did not darethink-


04-11-17-One of The People of the lawful state, Colorado: Attention: Public officers and
fiduciaries... The people, your employers are speaking

following fundamentals of law are antecedent, as in set in Stone, even in your


very own legal system, and they are well established & accepted as the moral
& ethical foundations by which we must view, act, and re-act to, the facts &
truths of all Civil matters. So, as a gentle reminder;

1. "There can be no sanction or penalty imposed upon one because of his/her


exercise of Constitutional Rights." [See also your very own "Administrative
Procedures Act (1948), Section #12", wherein, "No part of this act shall be in
violation of anyone's Constitutional rights."]
2. Litigants can be assisted by unlicensed laymen during any judicial proceedings."
3. Members of groups who are competent non-lawyers can assist other members of
the group achieve the goals of the group in court without being charged with
"unauthorized practice of law."
4. A next friend is a individual who represents someone who is unable to tend to his
or her own interest."
Meyer v. Nebraska, 262 U.S. 390, 399, 400.
Schware v. Board of Examiners, United State Reports 353 U.S. pages 238, 239.
Sims v. Aherns, 271 SW 720 (1925).
Sherar v. Cullen, 481 F. 2d 946 (1973).
Brotherhood of Trainmen v. Virginia ex rel. Virginia State Bar, 377 U.S. 1; v.
Wainwright, 372 U.S. 335; Argersinger v. Hamlin, Sheriff 407 U.S. 425.
NAACP v. Button, 371 U.S. 415.
United Mineworkers of America v. Gibbs, 383 U.S. 715.
Johnson v. Avery, 89 S. Ct. 747 (1969).
Federal Rules of Civil Procedures, Rule 17, 28 USCA "Next Friend."

1 Finally, Madam & Sir, I could not help but notice your repeated use of the
terms, Conspiracy, and Racketeering, throughout your Presumption of
Indictment. I would remind you, that as We the People of Colorado united
& assembled is a protected & reserved exercise of common right under
the First Amendment! To presume our unity & assembly to be a
Conspiracy, is, quite simply, spurious, and an unfounded & unsupported
claim! Inasmuch, I genuinely & sincerely believe you are heading directly
for multiple Jury Nullifications, should you choose to move forward
against any of these individual living-born men & women on any single
Presented as a courtesy of the scannedretina arnie@arnierosner.com 714-964-4056 Page - 15
The Scanned Retina; A Private Citizen Advocacy Membership Group, dedicated to Securing
Lawful Constitutional Compliance for all Americans.

Things about which you did not darethink-


04-11-17-One of The People of the lawful state, Colorado: Attention: Public officers and
fiduciaries... The people, your employers are speaking

criminal count, including any count of conspiracy, or racketeering! Doing


so, will, most likely, inflame all Colorado non-profits, as in all churches &
religious organizations who unite, and/or assemble, and who are regularly
induced & influenced into tithing & paying tribute to a non-profit
organization around the State, and around the Country, as well! I recall,
too, that the Colorado BAR Association is listed & registered with the
Colorado Secretary of State as a Private, non-profit & Charitable
Corporation! Are the dues you pay as members considered excessive &
Extortive? Yes? or No? Does the Colorado BAR Association operate an
antitrust Monopoly over the Peoples State departments of government? I
believe the Goldwater Institutes Investigation has confirmed this to be
the Truth! The Facts & Truths of the matter are also found on the very
first page of your Presumption of Indictment, where you re-present THE
PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF COLORADO, just in case you hadnt noticed!
As a point of order, the People of the State of Colorado CANNOT, by any
means or measure, be incorporated without their knowledgeable & free
willed-Consent, and you have NEVER been given Legislative Authority to
presume such! [See Secretary of State Registry for THE PEOPLE OF THE
STATE OF COLORADO.....This alleged CORPORATION, then, is a fiction,
and does NOT exist under Law!].

CAUTION, then, is well advised! Proceed at your Own Risk!

In closing, I do, from my Heart of Hearts, Cythia & Robert, wish you, and your
families, the very best that "Life" and your "Spirit" have to offer you!
"Redemption," it is said,"begins with Mercy!" "Mercy" requires that we "Pay it
Forward!"

I look forward to reading your responses, protests, and rebuttals, and I look
forward to your expediting the dismissal of each & every count against my
friends, their release, and your returning them all safely to their homes &
families!

I thank you, in advance, for your Honor, Character, Courage, Integrity, and
Sacrifices!
Presented as a courtesy of the scannedretina arnie@arnierosner.com 714-964-4056 Page - 16
The Scanned Retina; A Private Citizen Advocacy Membership Group, dedicated to Securing
Lawful Constitutional Compliance for all Americans.

Things about which you did not darethink-


04-11-17-One of The People of the lawful state, Colorado: Attention: Public officers and
fiduciaries... The people, your employers are speaking

In Honor, Service & Fidelity!

Steven Duane Curry

Steven Duane Curry; Executor-in-Probate 'Sui Juris'


All Rights Reserved
UCC 1-308
970-316-1361
cwheileg@gmail.com

Presented as a courtesy of the scannedretina arnie@arnierosner.com 714-964-4056 Page - 17


The Scanned Retina; A Private Citizen Advocacy Membership Group, dedicated to Securing
Lawful Constitutional Compliance for all Americans.

Things about which you did not darethink-


04-11-17-One of The People of the lawful state, Colorado: Attention: Public officers and
fiduciaries... The people, your employers are speaking

Presented as a courtesy of the scannedretina arnie@arnierosner.com 714-964-4056 Page - 18


The Scanned Retina; A Private Citizen Advocacy Membership Group, dedicated to Securing
Lawful Constitutional Compliance for all Americans.

Things about which you did not darethink-


04-11-17-One of The People of the lawful state, Colorado: Attention: Public officers and
fiduciaries... The people, your employers are speaking

Colorado Corporate Governance?

Notice: Suspected Impersonation of Public Officers Colorado

Colorado v Nalty malicious prosecution by an illegal incorporated court is being


exposed worldwide.

ColoradoOffice of governor is currently vacant!

TRUE BILL OF INDICTMENT- COUNTY TECHNICAL SERVICES, INC Colorado

Purging the Impostors of Colorado? What about California? Arizona? New York?
America?

Senator Hill: On your watchmore Colorado state officials are committing


Misprision of felony 18 USC Code Section 4

Colorado Representative Steve Lebsock Reporting Fraud to civil authority

Rick01 commented on Doreen commented on Colorado:

Colorado; A State With no Lawful Government! A State run by Impostors!

Colorado: BIG-TIME TROUBLE FOR PRETEND PUBLIC SERVANTS

Chess or Checkers? Which is it? More Fraud in Colorado

Toxic Archive Jim Porter Colorado

The Colorado Summary of Corruption

Colorado Voter Fraud You Aint Seen Nothing YET!

Any Legitimate Journalists in Colorado? Or have they all been bought off?

THE PEOPLES COMMON LAW GRAND JURY Colorado

Presented as a courtesy of the scannedretina arnie@arnierosner.com 714-964-4056 Page - 19


The Scanned Retina; A Private Citizen Advocacy Membership Group, dedicated to Securing
Lawful Constitutional Compliance for all Americans.

Things about which you did not darethink-


04-11-17-One of The People of the lawful state, Colorado: Attention: Public officers and
fiduciaries... The people, your employers are speaking

Justice in Colorado

Colorado open records act-cora

Successful Common Law Courts held in Colorado:

Colorado BAR to be Dismantled? A foreign Control Mechanism over Courts.

Foreign Agents; Elected Officials? Congress? County and City Commissions?

Colorado; The land of the Free Americans

As Promised: Special News from Colorado. The Day of Infamy redefined!

THE PEOPLES COMMON LAW GRAND JURY Colorado

Criminal Complaints to be filed against key Colorado Public Officers

Eric William Madsen: Governor Colorado 1994 vrs de facto governor Roy Romer

Presented as a courtesy of the scannedretina arnie@arnierosner.com 714-964-4056 Page - 20


The Scanned Retina; A Private Citizen Advocacy Membership Group, dedicated to Securing
Lawful Constitutional Compliance for all Americans.

Things about which you did not darethink-