0 évaluation0% ont trouvé ce document utile (0 vote)
92 vues2 pages
This rubric evaluates science fair projects across several categories including the title page, abstract, table of contents, literature review, hypothesis, experiment details, graphs/charts, analysis, conclusion, recommendations, acknowledgements, and works cited. Projects are scored on a scale from emerging to mastery in each category based on criteria such as including all required elements, using proper formatting, demonstrating logical thinking, and applying information to answer the original question. The highest scoring projects meet all criteria with clear and thorough explanations.
This rubric evaluates science fair projects across several categories including the title page, abstract, table of contents, literature review, hypothesis, experiment details, graphs/charts, analysis, conclusion, recommendations, acknowledgements, and works cited. Projects are scored on a scale from emerging to mastery in each category based on criteria such as including all required elements, using proper formatting, demonstrating logical thinking, and applying information to answer the original question. The highest scoring projects meet all criteria with clear and thorough explanations.
This rubric evaluates science fair projects across several categories including the title page, abstract, table of contents, literature review, hypothesis, experiment details, graphs/charts, analysis, conclusion, recommendations, acknowledgements, and works cited. Projects are scored on a scale from emerging to mastery in each category based on criteria such as including all required elements, using proper formatting, demonstrating logical thinking, and applying information to answer the original question. The highest scoring projects meet all criteria with clear and thorough explanations.
Title Page (5) Present, No Name, No Capitalization in Capitalization in /5 No Capitalization. Title OR Missing title, 28pt font, (1) full name (3) Name, Punct. (4-5) Abstract (10) Missing parts, Far Less than page or page to 1 page, less than page, not more than 1 page, Includes full a summary of full Includes most summary. (8-10) experiment. (1-5) summary but /10 missing key parts (hypothesis, data, conclusion) (5-7) Table of Contents (5) No #s, out of order, Present, Missing Present, good Missing >3 parts (1- some numbers or 1- format, pages, /5 2) 2 parts (3-4) include all parts (5) Literature Review (15) 1 page or less, no Clear format (intro, Clear Format, flow between body, conclusion), background No I paragraphs, no not applicable info, knowledge is citations (1-5) citations but in applicable to /15 wrong format, 1-1 experiment, proper pages. (6-10) in text citations, @ least 2 pages (11-15) Hypothesis (10) Present, lack of logic Not If___ and I___ If___ and I ___ just guess, or not then___, but logical then___, answering question and answers Falsifiable, answers /10 (1-4) question. (5-8) question with logic (9-10) Experiment Details Missing steps Lists materials, List materials, (15) unclear to follow, rough procedure procedure specific not exact difficult but can be with measurements, No I measurements/ followed, needs repeat of /15 amounts, No more specifics, or experiment. (11-15) repetition of repeat only once (6- procedure. (1-5) 10) Graphs/Charts (10) Not sufficient data, Missing some titles, Titles (main and no titles, AND not but has others, needs axis), color if No I formatted to show color to read (not in needed, formatted to /10 trends. (1-5) color), OR not show trends. (9-10) formatted to show trends (6-8) Analysis (10) Not applicable to Applies to data, Applies to presented presented data, just some logic but data, logical, shows /10 No I restating data no mostly just restates thought not just meaning (1-5) data (6-8) repeating data (9-10) Conclusion (10) Same as analysis, no Answer but not to Answers specific final answer. (1-5) tested question. question. States No I Adjusts answer to whether experiment /10 hypothesis. (6-8) supports hypothesis or not. (9-10) Recommendations (5) Missing (0) Slightly applicable Applicable to real No I to real life or future. life or future, goes /5 Could go more in into depth (4-5) depth (1-3) Acknowledgements (5) Missing (0) Present, not in Present in complete /5 complete sentences sentences (5) (4) Works Cited Not APA format or APA, 3 or more APA, 3 or more <3 sources (1-2) sources, but sources valid sources. /5 questionable (3-4) Total /105