Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Czarina Muyargas
Specific Aims
College students are the age population at highest risk for prescription drug abuse. This
particular group of individuals are incessantly exposed to an environment in which social events
and parties are a part of their everyday lives, and drug use and alcohol is common and
uncontrolled. Research has shown that prescription drug abuse occurs more frequently within
wealthy communities where Caucasians make up the racial majority. This educational and
awareness program has been created to address prescription drug abuse in the community setting
within this targeted population, by utilizing interactive seminars and workshops to disseminate
information that is relatable and applicable to college students residing in Los Angeles County,
California. This program aims to not only educate college students on prescription drugs, their
intended and proper use, as well as ways in which individuals misuse and abuse them, but also
provide the necessary skills to recognize particular risks in various environments and effectively
improve them. Prescription drug abuse doesnt occur in only certain individuals. It can affect
everyone regardless of their gender, age, ethnicity, and socioeconomic status, though motivations
A total of 720 college students between the ages of 18 and 25 years-old, living in Los
Angeles County, California will be recruited to participate in the program. 40% of the
participants living in Manhattan Beach will be selected to become the experimental group that
will receive the program, while 40% of the participants living in Santa Monica will be part of the
comparison group that does not receive anything more than their current level of knowledge and
understanding of the issue. Univariate analysis will be conducted to measure the 30% increase in
knowledge at posttest from questions 1 through 8 using a chi-squared test. Data taken from
PRESCRIPTION DRUG ABUSE AMONG COLLEGE STUDENTS 3
questions 1 through 8 will be reported as nominal data in the form of a bar graph with the
percentages and numbers of participants reporting answers on prescription drugs and level of
safety. Bivariate analysis will be conducted to measure the 5% increase in behavior change
measured at posttest through questions 9 through 15. An independent sample t-test will be used
to make a meaningful evaluation between the experimental and comparison group. In addition, a
dependent sample t-test will compare the pre/posttest results within each of the groups at a
significance level of alpha=0.05. Data will be reported as nominal data by utilizing a pie chart
and frequency table. The mean, mode, and standard deviation will be reported as well.
Prescription drug abuse has reached unprecedented epidemic percentages among young
adults in the United States. The nationwide prevalence rate amongst this subpopulation of 18 to
regular basis (Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration [SAMHSA], 2012).
Commonly abused types of prescription drugs include opioids, prescribed for pain, central
nervous system (CNS) depressants, used for anxiety and sleep disorders, and stimulants,
commonly used for attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder and narcolepsy (National Institute on
Increases in the abuse of prescription drugs have led to substantial increases in mortality.
Prescription drug overdose cause about 50 Americans to die every day and cause more than
16,000 deaths annually (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [CDC], 2016). In 2014,
more than 14,000 people died in the United States from overdoses, with rates higher among non-
Hispanic whites (CDC, 2016). Whats even more alarming is that the mortality rate of accidental
PRESCRIPTION DRUG ABUSE AMONG COLLEGE STUDENTS 4
drug overdose has quadrupled since 1999 (CDC, 2016). Among young adults, for every death
due to prescription drug overdose, there were 22 treatment admissions and 119 emergency room
In the state of California, the occurrence of prescription drug abuse corresponds to the
nationwide trends. In the most recent National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH),
9.07% of California residents reported using prescription drugs in the past month. The national
average was 8.02% (SAMHSA, 2015). As the most populous state in the country with 38.8
million residents as of 2015, the raw number of individuals affected by improper and misuse of
prescription drugs is substantial, with rates varying significantly across counties, and even within
counties (CDADP, 2015). With the vast majority of the cities within Los Angeles County being
affluent, a wide variety of drugs become readily accessible, making it an environment where
prescription drug abuse can thrive. Each week, an estimated number of one to two individuals
under the age of 25 die as a result of prescription drug abuse in Los Angeles County (Los
Angeles County Department of Public Health, 2013). In 2014, 342 emergency room visits were
specifically related to prescription and over-the-counter drugs in those between the ages of 12
and 25 years-old. Of these emergency room visits, about 64% of the 186 who were admitted into
the hospital for treatment involved 18 to 25 year-oldsof which 42 later died from prescription
and over-the-counter drug overdose. According to the Los Angeles County Coroners Office,
mortality from prescription drug overdose have shockingly surpassed mortality resulting from
illicit drug overdose. Evidence suggests a steady increase of morbidity and mortality rates
Prescription drug abuse is a very serious problem that comes with a high burden of costs.
Each year, the U.S. economy is exhausted out of $190 billion in funds. This total includes $130
PRESCRIPTION DRUG ABUSE AMONG COLLEGE STUDENTS 5
billion in lost productivity, $20 billion in healthcare costs, and $40 billion in legal costs Should
the prevalence and incidence rates of prescription drug abuse continue to rise substantially,
expenditures are projected to exceed $500 billion by 2016a 148% increase in just three years
(NIDA, 2012).
At various times throughout the year, the Drug Enforcement Administration organizes
drug collection campaigns throughout thousands of sites across the country, where they collect
unused, unwanted, expired, or dangerous medications. This program enlists the assistance of
local law enforcement agencies, which often have these medication disposal sites established on
their property. It guarantees the safe disposal of medications and allows individuals to
anonymously drop off medications, while ensuring that local law enforcement upholds their civic
duty to protect the community (Drug Enforcement Administration, 2013). Informing community
members of upcoming prescription drug collection days can help reduce the number of
prescription drugs found in peoples homes and help to ensure the proper disposal of prescription
drugs.
The joint partnership of Cardinal Health and Ohio State University led to the
development of the Generation Rx University Toolkit, which guides college students, faculty,
and staff in educating others about the misconceptions, realities, and dangers of prescription drug
abuse. Upon accessing Cardinal Healths Generation Rx website, members of the general public
are provided with a supply of educational resources, including presentations and handouts, free
of costs (Cardinal Health, 2013). This program stands out because it encourages community
organizations, educators, and studentsto collaborate and develop partnerships in the hopes of
decreasing the prevalence and incidence of prescription drug abuse within the community.
At several colleges and universities along the East Coast, existing Good Samaritan
policies at the state level have been adopted on campus to address the consequences of alcohol
and drug consumption. These policies encourage students to call the police when they fear that
one of their peers may be in danger from consuming these dangerous substances. Additionally,
campus policies assure that any student who calls campus police or another emergency service to
help another student with a drug or alcohol-related medical issue will not face legal
consequences. This is a great program to have at all college campuses throughout the nation
because it not only recognizes the severity of the problem, but also offers a more meaningful
solution. Students are given an opportunity to help save the life of a fellow student in need
ineffectiveness due to their lack of flexibility and failure in considering that many adolescents
will at least experiment with substance use (Boccanfuso and Kuhfield, 2011). Although it
provides the structure necessary to address the problem as a legitimate threat, its application of
imposing harsh punishments have attributed to program failure. Reconnecting Youth, Positive
Action, Too Good for Drugs, and Skills for Adolescents are highly effective alternative
approaches to zero-tolerance amongst youth and adolescent populations in the K-12 grade level.
Such programs include the promotion of character development, academic achievement, school
bonds, healthy activities, and social-emotional skill-building. Because previous studies of these
decrease in drug involvement, it is believed that the positive impacts of these programs will carry
on as these individuals transition into college and become young adults (Boccanfuso and
Kuhfield, 2011). All of these components have been implemented into the National Youth Anti-
Drug Media Campaign to target a wider audience through various means of media advertising.
Information contained within these advertisements further reinforces the knowledge and skills
that individuals may have previously acquired at school or other clinical environments, such as
their physicians office or the local pharmacy (Johnson et. al, 2011).
program in the United States as it has reduced binge drinking and excessive drinking prevalence
amongst college students. This intervention incorporates motivational interviewing in the form
of two one-on-one interviews, which are designed to promote reduced alcohol consumption or
abstinence among high-risk drinkers (Boccanfuso and Kuhfield, 2011). These sessions provide
the individual with a greater sense of self-awareness in terms of their drinking behaviors so that
they can eventually develop a safer drinking plan (Boccanfuso and Kuhfield, 2011). Although
the BASICS model has only been used to specifically address alcohol consumption, the
motivational interviewing component offers a clinical approach that seems promising in possibly
Theoretical Relevance
The framework for the proposed program will be guided by the Social Cognitive Theory
in which the continuous interactions between an individual and their environment dictate their
behavior. The Social Cognitive Theory explains how people acquire and maintain certain
behavioral patterns, while also providing the basis for intervention strategies (Bandura, 1997).
What makes prescription drugs dangerous is the perceived notion that prescription drugs are
PRESCRIPTION DRUG ABUSE AMONG COLLEGE STUDENTS 8
safer because they are legally obtained from a pharmacy or through a friend or family member,
rather than illicit drugs purchased on the street (The Office of National Drug Control Policy
[ONDCP], 2011). This simple but critical misunderstanding (personal factor), consequentially
increases the likelihood of continued use (behavioral factor) amongst college students unless
measures are taken to rectify these misunderstandings (environmental factor), through continued
education and awareness efforts. This program aims to not only educate college students on
prescription drugs, their intended and proper use, as well as ways in which individuals misuse
and abuse them, but also provide the necessary skills to recognize particular risks in various
environments and effectively improve them. In doing so, the program hopes that students will
take the initiative to become more proactive about their health and the choices that they make
while in college.
prescription drugs, a pretest will be administered in the form of an internet-based survey prior to
the start of the program. This pretest serves a dual purpose, first, to serve as a means of
recruiting participants into the program, and second, to a guideline for program developers to
determine what information will be included in the educational component of the program.
Program developers expect that the participants will respond truthfully since their responses will
Education will take place in a series of six small seminars and workshops of thirty
minutes each, all of which will be taught by a team of college professors and other experts who
are either knowledgeable on the subject matter or have experience in dealing with college
students. In order to accommodate students on the quarter and semester system, implementation
will take place bi-weekly during the months of October and November in the fall or March and
PRESCRIPTION DRUG ABUSE AMONG COLLEGE STUDENTS 9
April in the spring. The program will begin the first week of the month and alternate every other
Friday, due to the majority of college students having class Monday through Thursday.
Participants are expected to actively listen, respond to questions presented, address any of their
concerns or questions, and engage in all individual and group activities presented in the delivery
and application of skills throughout the duration of the seminars and workshops.
This educational and awareness program has two objectives that will help measure
Objective 1: Upon completion of the program, participants will demonstrate at least 30%
increase in knowledge regarding prescription drugs and prescription drug abuse as measured by
Objective 2: Upon completion of the program, participants will demonstrate a 5% increase in the
through 15 at posttest.
Methods
Participants selected for this program will be made up of male and female college
students of all ethnic/cultural backgrounds between the ages of 18 and 25 years-old. These
individuals can be either part-time or full-time students at any college or university, however,
they must be residents of Los Angeles County, California while attending their respective college
or university. This information will be made available by the student via self-report during the
pre/posttest. College students who report themselves as living in Manhattan Beach and Santa
Monica will be asked to participate in the program, while those living in the cities of Calabasas,
PRESCRIPTION DRUG ABUSE AMONG COLLEGE STUDENTS 10
and Pasadena will be asked to participate in the pilot study. Participants must be 18 years-old in
order to participate in the program. Additionally, they must report the same zip code for both
pre/posttests or they will be excluded from the sample population. Undocumented individuals
sampling technique, from various locations throughout Los Angeles where college students
frequently hang out. These locations include college and university campuses, shopping centers,
as well as bars and clubs. It is critical to determine a sample size that is large enough to show
statistical significance and a sample that is small as possible that satisfies the criteria so that
resources are not wasted. 40% of the participants living in Manhattan Beach will be asked to
join the experimental group, while an additional 40% of the participants living in Santa Monica
Based upon the criteria used to determine the sample size, the 6.3 table will be used. A
0.8 power test, 0.2 for P1, and a 0.05 significance level for alpha will be used to determine Type
1 and Type 2 error. The effect size will be determined by the 30% rate of change measured by
objective #1 of the program. A minimum sample size of 300 college students per group will be
needed at posttest for a total of 600 minimum participants. 20% (or 120 participants) will be
added to this amount to account for the estimated percentage of the participants who cannot be
located, the estimated percentage of those who drop out during the program, and the estimated
percentage of those who refuse to participate. Therefore, a total sample size of 720 college
students will be needed; 360 participants will make up the experimental group while another 360
will be part of the comparison group. Data obtained from the pilot test will be used to determine
PRESCRIPTION DRUG ABUSE AMONG COLLEGE STUDENTS 11
the number of program participants. Having a sufficient staff size ensures adequate program
A gift card worth $10 to Starbucks will serve as an incentive to initially recruit program
participants. At this time, they will also receive a raffle entry for a chance to win a pair of
concert tickets to see Drake perform live at the Staples Center in Los Angeles. However, they
must report themselves as living in a Los Angeles County zip code during the pretest in order to
win both the $10 gift card and the raffle entry. Additionally, each participant must sign and
amongst those recruited, additional raffle entries will be given at the completion of every seminar
or workshop attended, making the likelihood of winning the raffle increase with participation.
The maximum number of raffle entries will be no more than seven entries per participant. To be
eligible for the concert tickets, participation in all activities is required. Individuals who opt out
at any time during the program will be placed in a separate raffle for a smaller prize of a $50 gas
card. Winners of each raffle will be contacted within 30 days after program completion.
The non-equivalent comparison group will be chosen as the experimental design method for this
program. This method eliminates history, maturation, testing, and instrumentation as threats to
internal validity because of the utilization of two groupsone of which receives the program,
while the other receives nothingand the implementation of a pre/posttest in measuring and
comparing the results directly attributed from the program. However, there is a slight chance
that participants may be able to recollect the answers that they marked in the pretest when they
fill out the posttest two months later, which may have an effect on testing.
PRESCRIPTION DRUG ABUSE AMONG COLLEGE STUDENTS 12
Since there is no randomization of the participants, the chosen method cannot account for
the following threats to internal validity, regression to the means, selection, and attrition. As far
as the regression to the means effect, program staff do not expect to be concerned with it because
they have already pre-selected which cities belong to the experimental and comparison groups.
Ultimately, the experimental group will get the program and the comparison group wont.
Selection will be accounted for because, again, the program staff have already pre-selected the
cities which will and will not receive the program, so college students living in Manhattan Beach
cannot be members of the comparison group since they have already been assigned to the
experimental group. Similarly, college students living in Santa Monica cannot be assigned to the
experimental group since they are part of the comparison group. However, this does not
completely eliminate selection from occurring as college students may have friends living within
the same city as them in either groups. Because of the magnitude of the incentive thats at stake,
once participation has been completed, it is believed that the college students are less likely to
drop out, which takes the attrition effect into account. And even if they do drop out for some any
reason, their consolation prize is another raffle opportunity to compete for a $50 gas card.
Interaction can be controlled if two or more of the internal threats to validity in history,
maturation, testing, or instrumentation are used. Diffusion will be eliminated because college
students living Manhattan Beach and Santa Monica will be separated from each other by
experimental and control groups, will attend different schools, and because each participant will
sign a waiver that explicitly states they are not to discuss their involvement in the program to
their peers. Compensation and compensatory rivalry will be eliminated by the training of staff
and the programs process evaluation. It is expected that demoralization should not occur
because college students are offered incentives at each step of the wayone $10 gift card to
PRESCRIPTION DRUG ABUSE AMONG COLLEGE STUDENTS 13
Starbucks and one raffle entry for the grand prize for initial participation in the survey and
program recruitment, as well as one raffle entry for every seminar and workshop attended
thereafter. The likelihood of winning the concert tickets increases with program participation.
Even if the college students do not win the concert tickets, they still get to keep their $10 gift
card in addition to the knowledge and skills that they learned from the program.
External threats to validity, including artificial environment and ethical issues, will be
eliminated by one, the presentation of real-life scenarios that detail the thoughts and experiences
of college students at various settings in which prescription drug abuse occurs during the
seminars, and two, the instruction, demonstration, and application of skills used to problem-solve
compromising situations during the interactive workshop. Guest speakers will be asked to
voluntarily participate in helping program staff deliver the necessary information during the
seminars. These individuals include current and former college students who have had
experience dealing with alcohol and prescription drug abuse in a college setting. This ensures
that the information provided will not be coming from a biased, judgmental perspective, but
rather a more realistic one. By making the program more relatable to college students, the
program experience and the information obtained will be retained in their memory for a longer
period of time. Ethical issues will be accounted for by signing a waiver that clearly states that
those that participate in the program are to maintain and adhere to the confidential policies stated
Operationalization of Concepts
Questions 1 through 8 of the pre/posttest includes knowledge questions that were adapted
from the Smart Moves School Toolkit Web Pre-Test and Quiz and the Drug-Related Knowledge,
Attitudes and Beliefs in Ireland Nation-Wide Survey. The questions will yield nominal data in
PRESCRIPTION DRUG ABUSE AMONG COLLEGE STUDENTS 14
the form of matching, multiple choice, true/false, and choose all of the correct answers questions.
These questions will discern prescription drugs, illegal drugs, and over-the-counter drugs from
one another; identify prescription drugs that are commonly abused by college students and
sources from which they are obtained; assess judgment on whether it is okay to take medications
that are not prescribed; and determine knowledge on the severity of prescription drugs (National
Association of School Nurses, 2013). The responses to these questions will help determine the
current level of knowledge that college students have regarding prescription drug abuse and any
To measure the beliefs of college students, questions 9 through 15 have been adapted
from a combination of resources, including the 2013 Indiana Substance Use Survey and the Core
Alcohol and Drug Survey-Long Form. These particular set of questions assess the alcohol and
substance use of college students in the form of nominal data. These include questions
regarding: alcohol use within the past six months and whether it was in combination of drugs;
specific prescription drug(s) used within the past six months and the frequency of use for each
one; location of where these substances were used; whether the college students individually
engaged in sexual intercourse; and whether these college students were intoxicated or under the
influence of alcohol and/or drugs while engaging in sexual intercourse (Jun et. al, 2013). It is a
well-known fact that college students are at high risk when it comes to prescription drug abuse
because of the environmental exposure to frequent parties and gatherings where alcohol is almost
always available. Usually when alcohol is available, the likelihood for engaging in high-risk
behaviors, including unprotected sex and combined alcohol and drug use, is heightened. The
responses to these questions will help determine whether past research is supported in this
program.
PRESCRIPTION DRUG ABUSE AMONG COLLEGE STUDENTS 15
Upon the completion of the eighteen survey questions at pre and posttest, there will be an
additional ten questions pertaining to the demographics of the participants. Questions 16 through
23 were adapted from the Core Alcohol and Drug Survey, Long Form and later modified
accordingly. Nominal level data will be retrieved in the form of male/female, yes/no, self-report,
and check one that applies questionsof which gender, date of birth, race/ethnic background,
class standing, student status, employment status, student housing, geographic location, and
living arrangements can be examined. These are important things to consider as it will help
assess possible risk and protective factors at the individual level with respect to prescription drug
abuse.
Pilot-testing of the program will be conducted in the form of six focus groups that will
include no more than ten students each. Participants of the pilot study will be college students,
who fit the main criteria of being 18 to 25 years-old and a Los Angeles County, California
resident. However, they must specifically live within the cities of Calabasas and Pasadena. Data
extrapolated from the pilot study will serve as a guide for determining the sample size needed for
the program, one that will provide an effect that is both measurable and significant. Relevant
information will be extracted from past research of programs and interventions that have shown
rates of success. Some of the components from past research conducted will be manipulated to
cater to the programs target population and later applied to the program itself. Program staff
will be under the advisement and guidance of highly experienced and trained experts with at
least ten years of experience in working with college students in some form of substance abuse.
Instruments to measure change include pre and posttests at program recruitment and termination,
PRESCRIPTION DRUG ABUSE AMONG COLLEGE STUDENTS 16
as well as the program materials, including PowerPoint presentations, brochures, and handouts,
handle and deal with college students prior to the implementation of the program. At program
implementation, program staff will join together in a series of meetings that occur before and
after the seminars and workshops. At this time, the staff will engage in a number of discussions
that include the agenda that takes place for the day, the goals and expectations from each session,
address concerns and/or problems that may have occurred and ways in which to troubleshoot
them, and suggestions for improving instruction in the future. One member will be designated as
the recorder, who will be in charge of documenting what occurred during the meeting in great
detail. Additionally, every student in attendance will be asked to sign in and out of each session.
At the end of each session, they will fill out a survey, based on a five-point Likert-scale, at the
end of every seminar and workshop that will assess the quality and validity of the information
presented, critique the program staffs delivery of information and instruction, highlight the good
and bad of each session, and include suggestions for the future.
nominal data in the form of a bar graph and the mode will be reported. The bar graph will show
the number and percentages of participants that answered questions 1 through 8 correctly and
prescription drugs and assessment of what is safe and unsafe. Univariate analysis will be
were met, data collected will be analyzed using inferential statistics to show a 0.05 level of
significance. To measure the 5% increase in positive behaviors from pretest to posttest, nominal
data taken from questions 9 through 15, which focuses on high-risk-taking behaviors of college
students and will be reported in the form of a pie chart and frequency table. The mode, mean,
and standard deviation will be reported as well. An independent sample t-test will be conducted
between the experimental and comparison group. A dependent sample t-test will compare the
pre and posttest results within each of the groups at a significance level of alpha=0.05.
Activity Month Month Month Month Month Month Month Month Month Month
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 8 9
Needs
Assessment
Program
development
Pilot testing
Sampling
Pretest
Program
Implementatio
n
Process
Evaluation
Posttest
Data Analysis
PRESCRIPTION DRUG ABUSE AMONG COLLEGE STUDENTS 18
Report Writing
Timeline
References
tolerance.pdf
Bretch, M. L. (2013). Patterns and Trends in Drug Abuse in Los Angeles County, California:
California Department of Alcohol and Drug Programs (CDADP). (2009). Summary Report and
from http://www.adp.ca.gov/Director/pdf/Prescription_Drug_Task_Force.pdf
California Department of Public Health. (2015). Prescription Opioid Misuse and Overdose
http://www.cdph.ca.gov/Pages/OpioidMisuseWorkgroup.aspx
http://www.cardinal.com/us/en/generationrx
Cardinal Health. (2013). Cardinal Health Foundation, the Ohio State University Launch Fourth
http://search.proquest.com.mcc1.library.csulb.edu/docview/1328127835?
accountid=10351
http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm6101a3.htm
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2016, June 21). Prescription Overdose Data | Drug
https://www.cdc.gov/drugoverdose/data/overdose.html
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2016, June 21). Understanding the Epidemic | Drug
https://www.cdc.gov/drugoverdose/epidemic/index.html
Core Institute of Student Health Programs, Illinois. Core Alcohol and Drug Survey,
related-hospital-emergency-room-visits
Executive Office of the President of the United States. (2015). California Drug Control Update.
_california.pdf
Reducing Prescription Drug Overdose Deaths: Utah's Prescription Safety Program. Pain
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com.mcc1.library.csulb.edu/doi/10.1111/j.1526-
4637.2011.01126.x/pdf
Jun, M.K. and King, R.A. (2013). Results of the Indiana College Substance Use Survey2013.
PRESCRIPTION DRUG ABUSE AMONG COLLEGE STUDENTS 20
from http://www.drugs.indiana.edu/publications/icsus/ICSUS_Survey_2013.pdf
Los Angeles Department of Public Health. (2013, January). Prescription Drug Abuse in Los
http://publichealth.lacounty.gov/docs/HealthNews/PrescriptionDrug-12-13.pdf
National Association of School Nurses. (2013). Smart Moves, Smart ChoicesStudent Pretest:
Teen Prescription (Rx) Drug Abuse Awareness. Silver Spring, MD: National Association
http://www.smartmovessmartchoices.org/pdfs/SmartMoves_SchoolToolkit_Pre-
Test_Web.pdf
National Association of School Nurses. (2013). Smart Moves, Smart ChoicesGet Facts:
Take the Quiz. Silver Spring, MD: National Association of School Nurses. Retrieved
from http://www.smartmovessmartchoices.org/quiz
National Council on Alcoholism and Drug Dependence (NCADD). (n.d.). Learn About Drugs:
drugs/prescription-drugs
National Council on Patient Information and Education. (n.d.). Prescription Drug Abuse on
http://www.talkaboutrx.org/documents/GetTheFacts.pdf
National Institute on Drug Abuse. (2015, August). Trends & Statistics | National Institute on
statistics
PRESCRIPTION DRUG ABUSE AMONG COLLEGE STUDENTS 21
National Institute on Drug Abuse. (2016, February). Abuse of Prescription (Rx) Drugs Affects
Young Adults Most | National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA). Retrieved from
https://www.drugabuse.gov/related-topics/trends-statistics/infographics/abuse-
prescription-rx-drugs-affects-young-adults-most
National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA). (2012). Prescription Drugs. Retrieved from
http://www.drugabuse.gov/drugs-abuse/prescription-drugs
Office of National Drug Control Policy (ONDCP). (2011). A Response to the Epidemic of
http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/ondcp/Fact_Sheets/prescription_drug_abus
e_fact_sheet_4-25-11.pdf
Office of National Drug Control Policy (ONDCP). (n.d.) National Youth Anti-Drug
campaign
Policy Impact: Prescription Painkiller OverdosesWhat's the Issue?. (2013, July 2). Centers for
http://www.cdc.gov/homeandrecreationalsafety/rxbrief/
Results from the 2012 National Survey on Drug Use and Health: Summary of National Findings.
(n.d.). Results from the 2012 NSDUH: Summary of National Findings, SAMHSA,
http://www.samhsa.gov/data/NSDUH/2012SummNatFindDetTables/NationalFindings/N
SDUHresults2012.htm