Vous êtes sur la page 1sur 45

Republic of the Philippines

DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Caraga Administrative Region
DIVISION OF SURIGAO DEL SUR
Tago - I District
BADONG NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL
Junction Badong - Cabangahan, Tago, Surigao del Sur

INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF) FOR TEACHERS


June 2016 - March 2017

Name of Employee: ROSMINDA B. MAGTAGAD Name of Rater:


Position: Teacher - I Position:
School: Badong National High School Date of Review:

TO BE FILLED UP DURING PLANNING

KEY RESULT
MAJOR FINAL AREAS WEIGHT
OBJECTIVES TIMELINE PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
OUTPUTS PER KRA
(KRAs)
5 200 or more updated lesson plans/logs prepared in SMART way
Prepare lesson plans and daily lesson 4 150-199 updated lesson plans/logs prepared in SMART way
logs of activities including appropriate,
10% 3 90-149 updated lesson plans/logs prepared in SMART way
adequate and updated instructional
materials 2 60-89 updated lesson plans/logs prepared in SMART way
1 1-59 updated lesson plans/logs prepared in SMART way
5 10 instructional materials used/produced are appropriate, adequate and updated
Facilitate learning through the use of 4 8 instructional materials used/produced are appropriate, adequate and updated
written/computerized lesson plans, 3 6 instructional materials used/produced are appropriate, adequate and updated
modules, teaching guides, and other 10%
learning resources with the adequate 2 4 instructional materials used/produced are appropriate, adequate and updated
and updated instructional materials 1 2 instructional materials used/produced are appropriate, adequate and updated
(Supported with write-up and documentation)
5 100% of the indicators in classroom walk-through are observed
Teaching Learning
4 85%-99% of the indicators in classroom walk-through are observed
Process (30%) Initiate discipline of students including
classroom rules, guidelines and 5% 3 70%-84% of the indicators in classroom walk-through are observed
individual and group task

/marcuz rex/
Teaching Learning
Process (30%) Initiate discipline of students including
classroom rules, guidelines and 5%
individual and group task 2 55%-69% of the indicators in classroom walk-through are observed
1 54% and below of the indicators in classroom walk-through are observed

5 100% of the pupils monthly attendance and are monitored and submitted every last day of the month

Monitor attendance, diversity 4 85%-99% of the pupils monthly attendance and are monitored and submitted every last day of the month
appreciation, safe, positive and
motivating environment, over-all
7% 3 70%-84% of the pupils monthly attendance and are monitored and submitted every last day of the month
physical atmosphere, cleanliness, and
orderliness of classrooms including
proper waste disposal. 2 55%-69% of the pupils monthly attendance and are monitored and submitted every last day of the month

54% and below of the pupils monthly attendance and are monitored and submitted every last day of the
1
month
Indicators:
Monitor, evaluate and maintain 1. Test Questions with TOS
pupils/students progress through
2. Class Record (with dates of quizzes, assignments, projects, portfolio, etc.)

*Assessment for Learning 3. Rating sheets

(Formative) 4. List of pupils/students output like projects, activities done/performed, etc.


8%
*Assessment as Learning 5 All indicators were prepared and submitted two weeks before the scheduled due time

(Reflective) 4 3 indicators were prepared and submitted one week before the scheduled time
*Assessment of Learning 3 2 indicators were prepared and submitted on the scheduled date
(Summative) 2 1 indicator was prepared and submitted on the scheduled date
*Periodic Test 1 no indicator was prepared and submitted on the scheduled date.
5 100% pupils/students were given remediation/enrichment successfully
Conduct remediation/enrichment 4 85%-99% pupils/students were given remediation/enrichment successfully
programs to improve performance 5% 3 70%-84% pupils/students were given remediation/enrichment successfully
indicators 2 55%-69% pupils/students were given remediation/enrichment successfully
1 54% and below pupils/students were given remediation/enrichment successfully

5 100% of the pupils/students records were prepared and submitted before the scheduled time without error

Students' Learning 85%-99% of the pupils/students records were prepared and submitted on or before the scheduled time
4
Outcomes (30%) without error

Maintain pupils/students school records 5%

/marcuz rex/
Students' Learning
Outcomes (30%)
70%-84% of the pupils/students records were prepared and submitted on or before the scheduled time
Maintain pupils/students school records 5% 3
with minimal error

2 55%-69% of the pupils/students records were prepared and submitted one week after the due time

54% and below of the pupils/students records were prepared and submitted two weeks before the due
1
time

5 85% and above of the pupils proficiency level have mastered the required learning competency.

4 82-84% of the pupils proficiency level have mastered the required learning competency

Attain the required GSA for Grade level


5% 3 79%-81% of the pupils proficiency level have mastered the required learning competency
and learning areas

2 76%-78% of the pupils proficiency level have mastered the required learning competency

1 75% of the pupils proficiency level have mastered the required learning competency

5 Attained 75% and above NAT MPS per subject area


4 Attained 65%-74% of NAT MPS per subject area.
Attain 75% MPS per subject area in the
5% 3 Attained 55%-64% of NAT MPS per subject area.
National Achievement Test
Provision of Quality 2 Attained 44%-54% of NAT MPS per subject area.
Basic Education 1 Attained 45% or below of NAT MPS per subject area.

5 100% of the target objectives were achieved, accomplishment with set agreements were fully documented.

84%-99% of the target objectives were achieved, accomplishment with set agreements were fully
4
documented.
Conduct regular/periodic PTA 68%-83% of the target objectives were achieved, accomplishment with set agreements were fully
8% 3
meetings/conferences documented.
52%-67% of the target objectives were achieved, accomplishment with set agreements were fully
2
documented.
51%-below of the target objectives were achieved, accomplishment with set agreements were fully
1
documented.
100% of the parents of the students needing academic monitoring was followed up supported with
5
documents.
Community 84%-99% of the parents of the students needing academic monitoring was followed up supported with
Involvement 20% 4
documents.
Visit parents of pupils/students needing
7%
academic monitoring/follow up

/marcuz rex/
Community
Involvement 20%
Visit parents of pupils/students needing 68%-83% of the parents of the students needing academic monitoring was followed up supported with
7% 3
academic monitoring/follow up documents.
52%-67 of the parents of the students needing academic monitoring was followed up supported with
2
documents.
51%-below of the parents of the students needing academic monitoring was followed up supported with
1
documents.
5 100% of project accomplishment completed were achieved with documentation.
Undertake/initiate 4 84%-99% of project accomplishment partially achieved with documentation.
projects/events/activities with external 5% 3 68%-83% of project accomplishment partially achieved with documentation.
funding/sponsorship 2 52%-67 of project accomplishment partially achieved with documentation.
1 51%-below of project accomplishment partially achieved with documentation.
Conducted a completed action research and have presented in at least in the Division Level Research
5
Conference/Summit
Conducted a completed action research and have presented in at least in the District Level Research
4
Conference/Summit
Conducted action research 5%
Conducted a completed action research but have not presented the result in any level of research
3
conference/summit
2 Proposed an action research.
1 Conceptualize an action research
Attended an aggregate of 48 hours of relevant trainings at least in the Division level and earned 9 units in
5
graduate studies

Professional 4 Attended an aggregate of 48 hours of relevant trainings at least in the Division level.
Growth and Attend relevant
Development 20% trainings/workshops/conferences or Attended an aggregate of 24 hours of relevant trainings at least in the Division level and earn 9 units in
10% 3
seminars or earn 9 units of post graduate studies
graduate education
2 Attended an aggregate of 24 hours of relevant trainings at least in the Division level.

1 Attended at aggregate of 24 hours training at least in the District level


(Attached certificate of participation and Grades)
5 Received certificate of recognition in the National level.
Received special 4 Received certificate of recognition in the Regional level
awards/citation/recognition for 5% 3 Received certificate of recognition in the Division level
exemplary performance 2 Received certificate of recognition in the District level
1 Received certificate of recognition in the School level

/marcuz rex/
Attain five of the following: 5 Attained 5 indicators with documents

4 Attained 4 indicators with documents

1. Serve as coordinator in any working


3 Attained 3 indicators with documents
committee in the school

2. Publish an article in national


2 Attained 2 indicators with documents
circulation
3. Serve as demonstration
Plus Factor 5% 5%
teacher/resource speaker/cooperating 1 Attained 1 indicator with documents
teacher

4. Received an outstanding employee


award at least in the District level

5. Conducted an innovation

6. Participated in any activities as


teachers association

TOTAL (Excluding Plus Factor) 100% OVER - ALL RATING OF ASSESSMENT

Plus Factor 5% ADJECTIVAL RATING

Adjectival Rating Scale


Outstanding 4.500 5.000 Ratee:
Very Satisfactory 3.500 4.499
Satisfactory 2.500 3.499 MARK Y. SALAS
Unsatisfactory 1.500 2.499 Teacher - I
Poor 1.000 1.499

/marcuz rex/
CHERS

CYNTHIA S. ESPIRITU
Head Teacher - III/School Head

TOB FILLED UP DURING EVALUATION

ACTUAL RESULTS
RATING SCORE
Q E T

5 5 5 5.00 0.50

0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00

/marcuz rex/
0.00 0.00

2 3 5 3.33 0.23

2 2 2 2.00 0.16

3 3 3 3.00 0.15

4 4 4 4.00 0.20

/marcuz rex/
4 4 4 4.00 0.20

4 4 4 4.00 0.20

3 3 3 3.00 0.15

2 3 4 3.00 0.24

2 2 2 2.00 0.14

/marcuz rex/
2 2 2 2.00 0.14

5 5 5 5.00 0.25

2 2 4 2.67 0.13

3 5 3 3.67 0.37

3 3 3 3.00 0.15

/marcuz rex/
2 2 2 2.00 0.10

2.97

Satisfactory

Rater:

CYNTHIA S. ESPIRITU, HT - III


School Head

/marcuz rex/
Republic of the Philippines
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Caraga Administrative Region
DIVISION OF SURIGAO DEL SUR
Tago - I District
BADONG NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL
Junction Badong - Cabangahan, Tago, Surigao del Sur

OFFICE PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (OPCRF)


June 2015 - March 2016

Name of Employee: MARK Y. SALAS Name of Rater:


Position: Teacher - I Position:
School: Badong National High School Date of Review:

TO BE FILLED UP DURING PLANNING

KEY RESULT
MAJOR FINAL AREAS WEIGHT
OBJECTIVES TIMELINE PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
OUTPUTS PER KRA
(KRAs)
with clear financial management system for the school supported by evidences such as reports, account
5
logs, database system.
Manage school resources in 4 with clear financial and resource management system but one or more requirements were missing
accordance with Deped policies and
10%
accounting rules and regulations and
other pertinent guideline. 3 with clear financial and resource management system but 2 reports or requirements were lacking
2 financial management system and reporting were in its initial stages
1 no financial report
with clear financial management system for the school supported by evidences such as reports, account
5
logs, database system.
School Leadership,
Management and Utilize funds for approved school 4 with clear financial and resource management system but one or more requirements were missing
Operation (20%) programs and projects as reflected in 5%
the SIP/AIP. 3 with clear financial and resource management system but 2 reports or requirements were lacking
2 financial management system and reporting were in its initial stages
1 no financial report
5 submitted required reports five days or more before the set deadlines
Prepare financial reports/liquidation
reports and submit/communicate the
5%
same to higher education authorities
and other education partners.
School Leadership,
Management and
Operation (20%)

KEY RESULT
MAJOR FINAL AREAS WEIGHT
OBJECTIVES TIMELINE PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
OUTPUTS PER KRA
(KRAs)
Prepare financial reports/liquidation 4 submitted required reports four days before the set deadlines
reports and submit/communicate the
5% 3 submitted required reports three days before the set deadlines
same to higher education authorities
and other education partners. 2 submitted required reports two days before the set deadlines
1 submitted required reports on the set deadlines
5 Attained 75% and above NAT MPS per subject area
4 Attained 65%-74% of NAT MPS per subject area.
Attain 75% MPS in NAT 15% 3 Attained 55%-64% of NAT MPS per subject area.
2 Attained 44%-54% of NAT MPS per subject area.
1 Attained 45% or below of NAT MPS per subject area.
5 zero drop-out
Monitor attendance of students 4 1%-3% drop-out
Instructional
regularly and attain/maintain zero drop- 10% 3 4%-6% drop-out
Leadership (40%)
out rate. 2 7%-9% drop-out
1 10%-above drop-out rate
5 100% fully implemented and functional instructional and supervisory plan
4 84%-99% implemented and functional instructional and supervisory plan
Improve instructional leadership
15% 3 68%-83% implemented and functional instructional and supervisory plan
practices.
2 52%-67 implemented and functional instructional and supervisory plan.
1 51%-below implemented and functional instructional and supervisory plan
5 100% of the teachers are observed and given clinical assistance
Provide clinical supervision to teachers 4 84%-99% of the teachers are observed and given clinical assistance
for the improvement of teaching- 10% 3 68%-83% of the teachers are observed and given clinical assistance
learning outcomes 2 52%-67 of the teachers are observed and given clinical assistance
1 51%-below of the teachers are observed and given clinical assistance
100% of the NCBTS-TSNA of teachers were consolidated and provided with an action plan fully
5
documented
Provision of Quality
84%-99% of the NCBTS-TSNA of teachers were consolidated and provided with an action plan fully
Basic Education 4
documented
Create a school-based professional 68%-83% of the NCBTS-TSNA of teachers were consolidated and provided with an action plan fully
10% 3
Human Resource learning community. documented
Management and
Development (25%)
Provision of Quality
Basic Education KEY RESULT
MAJOR FINAL AREAS WEIGHT
OBJECTIVES professional
Create a school-based TIMELINE PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
OUTPUTS PER KRA
10%
(KRAs)
Human Resource learning community.
Management and 52%-67 of the NCBTS-TSNA of teachers were consolidated and provided with an action plan fully
2
Development (25%) documented

1 51%-below of the NCBTS-TSNA of teachers were consolidated and provided with an action plan fully
documented
5 Conducted at least 4 INSET/GAD with 100% attendance of participants properly documented

4 Conducted at least 3 INSET/GAD with 100% attendance of participants properly documented


Organize and conducts INSETS/GAD
5%
Training. 3 Conducted at least 2 INSET/GAD with 100% attendance of participants properly documented

2 Conducted at least 1 INSET/GAD with 100% attendance of participants properly documented

1 no training conducted
5 initiate/collaborate with stakeholders to put up a tangible project fully documented.

4 has stakeholders partnership/mobilization plan complete with reports.


Encourage stakeholders to create safe, has mobilization plan and occasionally meets stakeholders in meetings and activities but some elements
3
healthy and child-friendly school 10% are not enough resources raised
environment for student. has mobilization plan and occasionally meets stakeholders but not resulting to resources generated and
Parents 2
evidences are missing
Involvement and
Community has no mobilization plan and seldom meets with stakeholders but not resulting to resources generated and
1
Partnership (15%) evidences missing.
5 4 meetings attended and conducted within the school year with documentation.
Meet parents regularly to confer/inform 4 3 meetings attended and conducted within the school year with documentation.
about school accomplishment and 5% 3 2 meetings attended and conducted within the school year with documentation.
students progress. 2 1 meeting attended and conducted within the school year with documentation.
1 conducted meetings but not documented
Attain five of the following: 5 Attained 5 indicators with documents
1. Serve as resource speaker at least in the
4 Attained 4 indicators with documents
District level.
2. Serve as chairman in any working
3 Attained 3 indicators with documents
technical committees.

Plus Factor 5% 5%
KEY RESULT
MAJOR FINAL AREAS WEIGHT
OBJECTIVES TIMELINE PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
OUTPUTS PER KRA
(KRAs)

3. Conducts one income generating project


2 Attained 2 indicators with documents
properly implemented with documentation.
Plus Factor 5% 5%
4. Conducts an action research/innovation. 1 Attained 1 indicator with documents

5.Organize/maintain one socio-cultural


group.

6. Publish article in national circulation.

7. Acquire title of school site.

TOTAL (Excluding Plus Factor) 100% OVER - ALL RATING OF ASSESSMENT

Plus Factor 5% ADJECTIVAL RATING

Adjectival Rating Scale


Outstanding 4.500 5.000 Ratee:
Very Satisfactory 3.500 4.499
Satisfactory 2.500 3.499 CYNTHIA S. ESPIRITU, HT - III
Unsatisfactory 1.500 2.499 School Head
Poor 1.000 1.499
CYNTHIA S. ESPIRITU
Head Teacher - III/School Head

TOB FILLED UP DURING EVALUATION

ACTUAL RESULTS
RATING SCORE
Q E T

3 3 3 3.00 0.30

4 5 4 4.33 0.22

4 4 4 4.00 0.20
ACTUAL RESULTS
RATING SCORE
Q E T

4 4 4 4.00 0.20

2 2 2 2.00 0.30

3 3 3 3.00 0.30

4 4 4 4.00 0.60

2 3 4 3.00 0.30

2 2 2 2.00 0.20
ACTUAL RESULTS
RATING SCORE
2
Q 2
E T2 2.00 0.20

5 5 5 5.00 0.25

2 2 4 2.67 0.27

3 5 3 3.67 0.18

2 2 2 2.00 0.10
ACTUAL RESULTS
RATING SCORE
Q E T

2 2 2 2.00 0.10

3.22

Satisfactory

Rater:

CYNTHIA O. ACEVEDO
Public School District Supervisor
Republic of the Philippines
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Caraga Administrative Region
DIVISION OF SURIGAO DEL SUR
Tago - I District
BADONG NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL
Junction Badong - Cabangahan, Tago, Surigao del Sur

INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF) FOR MASTER TEACHERS
June 2015 - March 2016

Name of Employee: MARK Y. SALAS Name of Rater:


Position: Teacher - I Position:
School: Badong National High School Date of Review:

TO BE FILLED UP DURING PLANNING

KEY RESULT
MAJOR FINAL AREAS WEIGHT
OBJECTIVES TIMELINE PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
OUTPUTS PER KRA
(KRAs)
5 200 or more updated lesson plans/logs prepared in SMART way
Write lesson plans/logs based on the 4 150-199 updated lesson plans/logs prepared in SMART way
standards-based curriculum guides 5% 3 90-149 updated lesson plans/logs prepared in SMART way
daily. 2 60-89 updated lesson plans/logs prepared in SMART way
1 1-59 updated lesson plans/logs prepared in SMART way
5 10 instructional materials used/produced are appropriate, adequate and updated
Facilitate learning through the use of 4 8 instructional materials used/produced are appropriate, adequate and updated
written/computerized lesson plans, 3 6 instructional materials used/produced are appropriate, adequate and updated
modules, teaching guides, and other 5%
learning resources with the adequate 2 4 instructional materials used/produced are appropriate, adequate and updated
and updated instructional materials. 1 2 instructional materials used/produced are appropriate, adequate and updated
(Supported with write-up and documentation)
5 100% of the indicators in classroom walk-through are observed
Teaching Learning
4 85%-99% of the indicators in classroom walk-through are observed
Process (20%) Initiate discipline of students including
classroom rules, guidelines and 5% 3 70%-84% of the indicators in classroom walk-through are observed
individual and group task. 2 55%-69% of the indicators in classroom walk-through are observed
Teaching Learning
Process (20%) Initiate discipline of students including
classroom rules, guidelines and 5%
individual and group task.
1 54% and below of the indicators in classroom walk-through are observed

5 100% of the pupils monthly attendance and are monitored and submitted every last day of the month

Monitor attendance, diversity 4 85%-99% of the pupils monthly attendance and are monitored and submitted every last day of the month
appreciation, safe, positive and
motivating environment, over-all
5% 3 70%-84% of the pupils monthly attendance and are monitored and submitted every last day of the month
physical atmosphere, cleanliness, and
orderliness of classrooms including
proper waste disposal. 2 55%-69% of the pupils monthly attendance and are monitored and submitted every last day of the month

54% and below of the pupils monthly attendance and are monitored and submitted every last day of the
1
month
Indicators:
Monitor, evaluate and maintain 1. Test Questions with TOS
pupils/students progress through
2. Class Record (with dates of quizzes, assignments, projects, portfolio, etc.)

*Assessment for Learning 3. Rating sheets

(Formative) 4. List of pupils/students output like projects, activities done/performed, etc.


3%
*Assessment as Learning 5 All indicators were prepared and submitted two weeks before the scheduled due time

(Reflective) 4 3 indicators were prepared and submitted one week before the scheduled time
*Assessment of Learning 3 2 indicators were prepared and submitted on the scheduled date
(Summative) 2 1 indicator was prepared and submitted on the scheduled date
*Periodic Test 1 no indicator was prepared and submitted on the scheduled date.
5 100% pupils/students were given remediation/enrichment successfully
Conduct remediation/enrichment 4 85%-99% pupils/students were given remediation/enrichment successfully
programs to improve performance 3% 3 70%-84% pupils/students were given remediation/enrichment successfully
indicators 2 55%-69% pupils/students were given remediation/enrichment successfully
1 54% and below pupils/students were given remediation/enrichment successfully

5 100% of the pupils/students records were prepared and submitted before the scheduled time without error

85%-99% of the pupils/students records were prepared and submitted on or before the scheduled time
4
without error
70%-84% of the pupils/students records were prepared and submitted on or before the scheduled time
Maintain pupils/students school records 3% 3
with minimal error
Maintain pupils/students school records 3%

2 55%-69% of the pupils/students records were prepared and submitted one week after the due time

54% and below of the pupils/students records were prepared and submitted two weeks before the due
1
time

5 85% and above of the pupils proficiency level have mastered the required learning competency.

4 82-84% of the pupils proficiency level have mastered the required learning competency

Attain the required GSA for Grade level


3% 3 79%-81% of the pupils proficiency level have mastered the required learning competency
and learning areas

2 76%-78% of the pupils proficiency level have mastered the required learning competency

1 75% of the pupils proficiency level have mastered the required learning competency

5 Attained 75% and above NAT MPS per subject area


4 Attained 65%-74% of NAT MPS per subject area.
Attain 75% MPS per subject area in the
3% 3 Attained 55%-64% of NAT MPS per subject area.
National Achievement Test
2 Attained 44%-54% of NAT MPS per subject area.
Students' Learning 1 Attained 45% or below of NAT MPS per subject area.
Outcomes (30%)
5 initiated at least one successful instructional program to 100% of the teachers with full documentation.
initiated at least one successful instructional program and involved 84%-99% of the teachers with full
4
documentation.
Initiate improvements in instructional
3% initiated at least one successful instructional program and involved 63%-83% of the teachers with full
programs 3
documentation.
initiated at least one successful instructional program and involved 52%-62% of the teachers with full
2
documentation.
1 no evidence of initiating instructional program.
lead 100% of the teachers in preparing innovative instructional materials within a year with full
5
documentation.
lead 84%-99%% of the teachers in preparing innovative instructional materials within a year with full
4
documentation.
Lead in the preparation of instructional
3% lead 68%-83% of the teachers in preparing innovative instructional materials within a year with full
materials. 3
documentation.
lead 52%-67% of the teachers in preparing innovative instructional materials within a year with full
2
documentation.
1 no evidence of leading in preparation of instructional program.
Excellent execution of the lesson plan and excellent mentoring services provided to the demonstration
5
teacher
Very Satisfactory execution of the lesson plan and Very Satisfactory mentoring services provided to the
4
Serve as demonstrator teacher, demonstration teacher
facilitator or resource speaker at the Satisfactory execution of the lesson plan and Satisfactory mentoring services provided to the
3% 3
school level and or provided mentoring demonstration teacher
services to demonstration teachers.
2 Fair execution of the lesson plan and Fair mentoring services provided to the demonstration teacher.

1
Poor execution of the lesson plan and Poor mentoring services provided to the demonstration teacher
100% of the test results were analyzed and interpreted per grading period and submitted before the
5
scheduled time.
84%-99% of the test results were analyzed and interpreted per grading period and submitted before the
4
scheduled time.
68%-83% of the test results were analyzed and interpreted per grading period and submitted before the
Interpret test results and utilize. 3% 3
scheduled time.
52%-67 of the test results were analyzed and interpreted per grading period and submitted before the
2
scheduled time.
51%-below of the test results were analyzed and interpreted per grading period and submitted before the
1
scheduled time.
Initiated a full blown project and program that enhance the curriculum and achieve 75% in NAT
5
Performance.
Initiated a full blown project and program that enhance the curriculum and achieve 65%-74% in NAT
4
Initiate projects and programs that will Performance.
enhance the curriculum and its delivery 3% Initiated a full blown project and program that enhance the curriculum and achieve 55%-64% in NAT
3
to achieve 75% NAT performance. Performance.
Initiated a full blown project and program that enhance the curriculum and achieve 54%-below in NAT
2
Performance.
Provision of Quality 1 the project or program did not materialized
Basic Education 100% of the teachers were observed quarterly and submitted the observation checklist form at the end of
5
the quarter.
84%-99% of the teachers were observed quarterly and submitted the observation checklist form at the end
4
of the quarter.
68%-83% of the teachers were observed quarterly and submitted the observation checklist form at the end
Observe teachers every quarter. 5% 3
of the quarter.
52%-67 of the teachers were observed quarterly and submitted the observation checklist form at the end of
2
the quarter.
51%-below of the teachers were observed quarterly and submitted the observation checklist form at the
1
end of the quarter.
Conducted mentoring/coaching activities to 100% of the teachers and prepared innovative instructional
5
materials fully documented.
Conducted mentoring/coaching activities to 84%-99%% of the teachers and prepared innovative
4
Conduct mentoring/coaching activities instructional materials fully documented.
and prepare instructional material 5% Conducted mentoring/coaching activities to 68%-83% of the teachers and prepared innovative instructional
3
available. materials fully documented.
Conducted mentoring/coaching activities to 52%-67% of the teachers and prepared innovative instructional
2
materials fully documented.
1 no evidence of mentoring/coaching conducted
Instructional
100% of the teachers were guided and provided with the necessary technical assistance in the carry-over
Supervision (20%) 5
of their duties and functions.
84%-99% of the teachers were guided and provided with the necessary technical assistance in the carry-
4
over of their duties and functions.
Guided co-teachers in the performance 68%-83% of the teachers were guided and provided with the necessary technical assistance in the carry-
5% 3
of duties and responsibilities. over of their duties and functions.
52%-67 of the teachers were guided and provided with the necessary technical assistance in the carry-
2
over of their duties and functions.
51%-below of the teachers were guided and provided with the necessary technical assistance in the carry-
1
over of their duties and functions.
100% of the teachers lesson plan/log were properly checked and submitted the observation log every end
5
of the month.
84%-99% of the teachers lesson plan/log were properly checked and submitted the observation log every
4
end of the month.
Check lesson plans of teachers in the 68%-83% of the teachers lesson plan/log were properly checked and submitted the observation log every
5% 3
assigned grade/subject area. end of the month.
52%-67 of the teachers lesson plan/log were properly checked and submitted the observation log every
2
end of the month.
51%-below of the teachers lesson plan/log were properly checked and submitted the observation log every
1
end of the month.
5 100% of the target objectives were achieved, accomplishment with set agreements were fully documented.

84%-99% of the target objectives were achieved, accomplishment with set agreements were fully
4
documented.
Conduct regular/periodic PTA 68%-83% of the target objectives were achieved, accomplishment with set agreements were fully
5% 3
meetings/conferences documented.
52%-67% of the target objectives were achieved, accomplishment with set agreements were fully
2
documented.
51%-below of the target objectives were achieved, accomplishment with set agreements were fully
1
documented.

Community
Involvement (15%)
100% of the parents of the students needing academic monitoring was followed up supported with
5
documents.
Community 84%-99% of the parents of the students needing academic monitoring was followed up supported with
Involvement (15%) 4
documents.
Visit parents of pupils/students needing 68%-83% of the parents of the students needing academic monitoring was followed up supported with
5% 3
academic monitoring/follow up documents.
52%-67 of the parents of the students needing academic monitoring was followed up supported with
2
documents.
51%-below of the parents of the students needing academic monitoring was followed up supported with
1
documents.
5 100% of project accomplishment completed were achieved with documentation.
Undertake/initiate 4 84%-99% of project accomplishment partially achieved with documentation.
projects/events/activities with external 5% 3 68%-83% of project accomplishment partially achieved with documentation.
funding/sponsorship 2 52%-67 of project accomplishment partially achieved with documentation.
1 51%-below of project accomplishment partially achieved with documentation.
Conducted a completed action research and have presented in at least in the Division Level Research
5
Conference/Summit
Conducted a completed action research and have presented in at least in the District Level Research
4
Conference/Summit
Conducted action research 5%
Conducted a completed action research but have not presented the result in any level of research
3
conference/summit
2 Proposed an action research.
1 Conceptualize an action research
Led at least 5 teachers in conducting enrichment program to improve proficiency level of at least 4 pupils to
5
at least one step higher in every quarter.

Led at least 5 teachers in conducting enrichment program to improve proficiency level of at least 2
4
pupils/students to at least one step higher in every quarter.
Take charge of the school reading
program, remedial and/or enrichment 4% Led at least 3 teachers in conducting enrichment program to improve proficiency level of at least 3 pupils to
3
program. at least one step higher in every quarter.

Led at least 3 teachers in conducting enrichment program to improve proficiency level of at least 1
2
Professional pupils/students to at least one step higher in every quarter.
Growth and 1 No evidence of conducting remedial program
Development (15%)
Participated in the planning of at least 1 training program conducted in the division level and submitted the
5
consolidated outputs before the scheduled time.

Participate in the planning and


implementation of training programs in 3%
school, district and division level.
Growth and
Development (15%)

Participated in the planning of at least 2 training programs conducted in the district level and submitted the
Participate in the planning and 4
consolidated outputs before the scheduled time.
implementation of training programs in 3%
school, district and division level. Participated in the planning of at least 1 training program conducted in the district level and submitted the
3
consolidated outputs before the scheduled time.
Participated in the planning of at least 2 training program conducted in the school level and submitted the
2
consolidated outputs before the scheduled time
1 No evidence of participation in planning training programs
Attended 3 or more seminars, workshops trainings and echoed to teachers in an excellent way with
5
documentation

Participate in seminars, workshops, 4 Attended 2 seminars, workshops trainings and echoed to teachers in an excellent way with documentation
trainings within a year (Division, 3%
Regional and National) 3 Attended 3 or more seminars, workshops trainings but failed to echo to teachers.
2 Attended 2 seminars, workshops trainings but failed to echo to teachers.
1 No trainings attended
Attain five of the following: 5 Attained 5 indicators with documents

1. Published at least one (1) article in


professional magazines/ periodicals 4 Attained 4 indicators with documents
related to field of specialization.

2. Served as resource person/


consultant in seminar/ workshop/ 3 Attained 3 indicators with documents
training related to field of specialization.
Plus Factor (5%) 5%
3. Conducted action research the
findings/ results of which were utilized 2 Attained 2 indicators with documents
within the rating period.

4. Designed evaluation and monitoring


1 Attained 1 indicator with documents
program for the district/ division.

5. Teacher-In-Charge of a school for


one rating period

TOTAL (Excluding Plus Factor) 100% OVER - ALL RATING OF ASSESSMENT

Plus Factor 5% ADJECTIVAL RATING


Adjectival Rating Scale
Outstanding 4.500 5.000 Ratee:
Very Satisfactory 3.500 4.499
Satisfactory 2.500 3.499 MARK Y. SALAS
Unsatisfactory 1.500 2.499 Teacher - I
Poor 1.000 1.499
TEACHERS

CYNTHIA S. ESPIRITU
Head Teacher - III/School Head

TOB FILLED UP DURING EVALUATION

ACTUAL RESULTS
RATING SCORE
Q E T

3 3 3 3.00 0.15

4 5 4 4.33 0.22

4 4 4 4.00 0.20
4 4 4 4.00 0.20

2 3 5 3.33 0.17

2 2 2 2.00 0.06

3 3 3 3.00 0.09

4 4 4 4.00 0.12
4 4 4 4.00 0.12

4 4 4 4.00 0.12

3 3 3 3.00 0.09

3 4 4 3.67 0.11

4 2 3 3.00 0.09
4 5 3 4.00 0.12

4 3 2 4.00 0.12

4 4 2 3.33 0.10

4 3 2 3.00 0.15
4 1 2 2.33 0.12

4 5 2 3.67 0.18

4 5 1 3.33 0.17

4 5 3 4.00 0.20
2 2 2 2.00 0.10

5 5 5 5.00 0.25

2 2 4 2.67 0.13

3 5 3 3.67 0.15

3 3 3 3.00 0.09
3 3 3 3.00 0.09

2 2 2 2.00 0.06

1 1 1 1.00 0.05

3.40

Satisfactory
Rater:

CYNTHIA S. ESPIRITU, HT - III


School Head
Republic of the Philippines
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Caraga Administrative Region
DIVISION OF SURIGAO DEL SUR
Tago - I District
BADONG NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL
Junction Badong - Cabangahan, Tago, Surigao del Sur

INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF) FOR TEACHERS


June 2016 - March 2017

Name of Employee: ROSMINDA B. MAGTAGAD Name of Rater:


Position: Teacher - I Position:
School: Badong National High School Date of Review:

TO BE FILLED UP DURING PLANNING

KEY RESULT
MAJOR FINAL AREAS WEIGHT
OBJECTIVES TIMELINE PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
OUTPUTS PER KRA
(KRAs)
5 200 or more updated lesson plans/logs prepared in SMART way
Prepare lesson plans and daily lesson 4 150-199 updated lesson plans/logs prepared in SMART way
logs of activities including appropriate,
10% 3 90-149 updated lesson plans/logs prepared in SMART way
adequate and updated instructional
materials 2 60-89 updated lesson plans/logs prepared in SMART way
1 1-59 updated lesson plans/logs prepared in SMART way
5 10 instructional materials used/produced are appropriate, adequate and updated
Facilitate learning through the use of 4 8 instructional materials used/produced are appropriate, adequate and updated
written/computerized lesson plans, 3 6 instructional materials used/produced are appropriate, adequate and updated
modules, teaching guides, and other 10%
learning resources with the adequate 2 4 instructional materials used/produced are appropriate, adequate and updated
and updated instructional materials 1 2 instructional materials used/produced are appropriate, adequate and updated
(Supported with write-up and documentation)
5 100% of the indicators in classroom walk-through are observed
Teaching Learning
4 85%-99% of the indicators in classroom walk-through are observed
Process (30%) Initiate discipline of students including
classroom rules, guidelines and 5% 3 70%-84% of the indicators in classroom walk-through are observed
individual and group task

/marcuz rex/
Teaching Learning
Process (30%) Initiate discipline of students including
classroom rules, guidelines and 5%
individual and group task 2 55%-69% of the indicators in classroom walk-through are observed
1 54% and below of the indicators in classroom walk-through are observed

5 100% of the pupils monthly attendance and are monitored and submitted every last day of the month

Monitor attendance, diversity 4 85%-99% of the pupils monthly attendance and are monitored and submitted every last day of the month
appreciation, safe, positive and
motivating environment, over-all
7% 3 70%-84% of the pupils monthly attendance and are monitored and submitted every last day of the month
physical atmosphere, cleanliness, and
orderliness of classrooms including
proper waste disposal. 2 55%-69% of the pupils monthly attendance and are monitored and submitted every last day of the month

54% and below of the pupils monthly attendance and are monitored and submitted every last day of the
1
month
Indicators:
Monitor, evaluate and maintain 1. Test Questions with TOS
pupils/students progress through
2. Class Record (with dates of quizzes, assignments, projects, portfolio, etc.)

*Assessment for Learning 3. Rating sheets

(Formative) 4. List of pupils/students output like projects, activities done/performed, etc.


8%
*Assessment as Learning 5 All indicators were prepared and submitted two weeks before the scheduled due time

(Reflective) 4 3 indicators were prepared and submitted one week before the scheduled time
*Assessment of Learning 3 2 indicators were prepared and submitted on the scheduled date
(Summative) 2 1 indicator was prepared and submitted on the scheduled date
*Periodic Test 1 no indicator was prepared and submitted on the scheduled date.
5 100% pupils/students were given remediation/enrichment successfully
Conduct remediation/enrichment 4 85%-99% pupils/students were given remediation/enrichment successfully
programs to improve performance 5% 3 70%-84% pupils/students were given remediation/enrichment successfully
indicators 2 55%-69% pupils/students were given remediation/enrichment successfully
1 54% and below pupils/students were given remediation/enrichment successfully

5 100% of the pupils/students records were prepared and submitted before the scheduled time without error

Students' Learning 85%-99% of the pupils/students records were prepared and submitted on or before the scheduled time
4
Outcomes (30%) without error

Maintain pupils/students school records 5%

/marcuz rex/
Students' Learning
Outcomes (30%)
70%-84% of the pupils/students records were prepared and submitted on or before the scheduled time
Maintain pupils/students school records 5% 3
with minimal error

2 55%-69% of the pupils/students records were prepared and submitted one week after the due time

54% and below of the pupils/students records were prepared and submitted two weeks before the due
1
time

5 85% and above of the pupils proficiency level have mastered the required learning competency.

4 82-84% of the pupils proficiency level have mastered the required learning competency

Attain the required GSA for Grade level


5% 3 79%-81% of the pupils proficiency level have mastered the required learning competency
and learning areas

2 76%-78% of the pupils proficiency level have mastered the required learning competency

1 75% of the pupils proficiency level have mastered the required learning competency

5 Attained 75% and above NAT MPS per subject area


4 Attained 65%-74% of NAT MPS per subject area.
Attain 75% MPS per subject area in the
5% 3 Attained 55%-64% of NAT MPS per subject area.
National Achievement Test
Provision of Quality 2 Attained 44%-54% of NAT MPS per subject area.
Basic Education 1 Attained 45% or below of NAT MPS per subject area.

5 100% of the target objectives were achieved, accomplishment with set agreements were fully documented.

84%-99% of the target objectives were achieved, accomplishment with set agreements were fully
4
documented.
Conduct regular/periodic PTA 68%-83% of the target objectives were achieved, accomplishment with set agreements were fully
8% 3
meetings/conferences documented.
52%-67% of the target objectives were achieved, accomplishment with set agreements were fully
2
documented.
51%-below of the target objectives were achieved, accomplishment with set agreements were fully
1
documented.
100% of the parents of the students needing academic monitoring was followed up supported with
5
documents.
Community 84%-99% of the parents of the students needing academic monitoring was followed up supported with
Involvement 20% 4
documents.
Visit parents of pupils/students needing
7%
academic monitoring/follow up

/marcuz rex/
Community
Involvement 20%
Visit parents of pupils/students needing 68%-83% of the parents of the students needing academic monitoring was followed up supported with
7% 3
academic monitoring/follow up documents.
52%-67 of the parents of the students needing academic monitoring was followed up supported with
2
documents.
51%-below of the parents of the students needing academic monitoring was followed up supported with
1
documents.
5 100% of project accomplishment completed were achieved with documentation.
Undertake/initiate 4 84%-99% of project accomplishment partially achieved with documentation.
projects/events/activities with external 5% 3 68%-83% of project accomplishment partially achieved with documentation.
funding/sponsorship 2 52%-67 of project accomplishment partially achieved with documentation.
1 51%-below of project accomplishment partially achieved with documentation.
Conducted a completed action research and have presented in at least in the Division Level Research
5
Conference/Summit
Conducted a completed action research and have presented in at least in the District Level Research
4
Conference/Summit
Conducted action research 5%
Conducted a completed action research but have not presented the result in any level of research
3
conference/summit
2 Proposed an action research.
1 Conceptualize an action research
Attended an aggregate of 48 hours of relevant trainings at least in the Division level and earned 9 units in
5
graduate studies

Professional 4 Attended an aggregate of 48 hours of relevant trainings at least in the Division level.
Growth and Attend relevant
Development 20% trainings/workshops/conferences or Attended an aggregate of 24 hours of relevant trainings at least in the Division level and earn 9 units in
10% 3
seminars or earn 9 units of post graduate studies
graduate education
2 Attended an aggregate of 24 hours of relevant trainings at least in the Division level.

1 Attended at aggregate of 24 hours training at least in the District level


(Attached certificate of participation and Grades)
5 Received certificate of recognition in the National level.
Received special 4 Received certificate of recognition in the Regional level
awards/citation/recognition for 5% 3 Received certificate of recognition in the Division level
exemplary performance 2 Received certificate of recognition in the District level
1 Received certificate of recognition in the School level

/marcuz rex/
Attain five of the following: 5 Attained 5 indicators with documents

4 Attained 4 indicators with documents

1. Serve as coordinator in any working


3 Attained 3 indicators with documents
committee in the school

2. Publish an article in national


2 Attained 2 indicators with documents
circulation
3. Serve as demonstration
Plus Factor 5% 5%
teacher/resource speaker/cooperating 1 Attained 1 indicator with documents
teacher

4. Received an outstanding employee


award at least in the District level

5. Conducted an innovation

6. Participated in any activities as


teachers association

TOTAL (Excluding Plus Factor) 100% OVER - ALL RATING OF ASSESSMENT

Plus Factor 5% ADJECTIVAL RATING

Adjectival Rating Scale


Outstanding 4.500 5.000 Ratee:
Very Satisfactory 3.500 4.499
Satisfactory 2.500 3.499 MARK Y. SALAS
Unsatisfactory 1.500 2.499 Teacher - I
Poor 1.000 1.499

/marcuz rex/
CHERS

CYNTHIA S. ESPIRITU
Head Teacher - III/School Head

TOB FILLED UP DURING EVALUATION

ACTUAL RESULTS
RATING SCORE
Q E T

0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00

/marcuz rex/
0.00 0.00

2 3 5 3.33 0.23

2 2 2 2.00 0.16

3 3 3 3.00 0.15

4 4 4 4.00 0.20

/marcuz rex/
4 4 4 4.00 0.20

4 4 4 4.00 0.20

3 3 3 3.00 0.15

2 3 4 3.00 0.24

2 2 2 2.00 0.14

/marcuz rex/
2 2 2 2.00 0.14

5 5 5 5.00 0.25

2 2 4 2.67 0.13

3 5 3 3.67 0.37

3 3 3 3.00 0.15

/marcuz rex/
2 2 2 2.00 0.10

2.47

Unsatisfactory

Rater:

CYNTHIA S. ESPIRITU, HT - III


School Head

/marcuz rex/
Transmutation Table
1.000 1.499 Poor
1.500 2.499 Unsatisfactory
2.500 3.499 Satisfactory
3.500 4.499 Very Satisfactory
4.500 5.000 Outstanding

Vous aimerez peut-être aussi