Vous êtes sur la page 1sur 1

Online Letters to the Editor

Association of Body Mass Index With Hospital Furthermore, they may have an improved rate of chemical
Mortality in ICU Patients thromboprophylaxis, which is independently associated with
survival (2). These bring to light the possibility that obese
To the Editor: patients may be triaged to higher care standards. Thus, differ-
ences in care standards between obese and nonobese patients

I
n an observational cohort study including 154,308 ICU could account for subsequent differences in hospital death.
patients, Pickkers et al (1) showed that obese and seriously The authors have disclosed that they do not have any poten-
obese patients had the lowest risk of hospital death in a tial conflicts of interest.
recent article in Critical Care Medicine. Strengths of this study
include the large sample of patients and adjust for most of Fu-Shan Xue, MD, Shi Yu Wang, MD, Rui Ping Li, MD
known risk factors that can affect mortality of ICU patients. Department of Anesthesiology, Plastic Surgery Hospital,
Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union
Also, Pickkers et al (1) openly discuss the limitations of their Medical College, Beijing, Peoples Republic of China
work. However, the study employed observational designs,
which are subject to uncontrolled confounding. In our view,
several issues in the study design may confound interpretation REFERENCES
1. Pickkers P, de Keizer N, Dusseljee J, et al: Body Mass Index Is
of the results. Associated With Hospital Mortality in Critically Ill Patients: An
First, illness severity is one of mostly important determi- Observational Cohort Study. Crit Care Med 2013; 41:18781883
nants for hospital death of ICU patients (2). Pickkers et al (1) 2. Kiraly L, Hurt RT, Van Way CW 3rd: The outcomes of obese patients
have attempted to control illness severity differences among in critical care. J Parenter Enteral Nutr 2011; 35(5 Suppl):29S35S
3. Zilberberg MD, Stern LS, Wiederkehr DP, et al: Anemia, transfusions
patients with different body mass index (BMI) by adjusting and hospital outcomes among critically ill patients on prolonged acute
the Simplified Acute Physiology Score II (SAPS II), but a sig- mechanical ventilation: A retrospective cohort study. Crit Care 2008;
nificant shortcoming of the SAPS II is inability to distinguish 12:R60
chronic disease from acute disease. This presents a poten- 4. Williams JF, Zimmerman JE, Wagner DP, et al: African-American and
white patients admitted to the intensive care unit: Is there a difference
tial problem in controlling for illness severity. It is generally in therapy and outcome? Crit Care Med 1995; 23:626636
believed that chronic diseases are more common in the obese 5. Horner RD, Lawler FH, Hainer BL: Relationship between patient race
patients. In our opinion, no matter how refined the adjustment and survival following admission to intensive care among patients of
primary care physicians. Health Serv Res 1991; 26:531542
is for differences in illness burden, it is never possible to ensure
DOI: 10.1097/01.ccm.0000435673.83682.58
a complete adjustment for illness severity differences among
ICU patients with various BMI and admission reasons. For
example, an obese patient with chronic cardiac insufficiency
and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease may qualify for a The Obesity-Mortality Paradox Phenomenon
SAPS II score of 16 at baseline, but this patient would have in Critically Ill Patients: One Size Does Not
a better short-term outcome than an underweight or normal
FitAll
patient with acute cardiac failure and acute respiratory insuf-
ficiency despite an equivalent SAPS II score. That is, a chroni- To the Editor:

I
cally higher SAPS II score in obese patients may manifest as n a recent issue of Critical Care Medicine, I read with great
a survival benefit. Thus, we argue that not taking impacts of interest the article by Pickkers et al (1), which reported
acute versus chronic disease scoring on the study outcomes that a large observational database derived from the Dutch
into account is injustice to conclude association between obe- National Intensive Care Evaluation registry shows an inverse
sity and hospital mortality in the ICU patients. association between obesity and hospital mortality in critically
Second, transfusion and ethnicity were not included in ill patients that could not be explained by a variety of known
adjusted potential confounders. It has been shown that trans- confounders.
fusions independently contribute to increased risk for hospi- Similarly, a short-term obesity-related survival benefit was
tal death of ICU patients (3). Furthermore, available evidence also concluded in some previous meta-analyses for patients
shows the existence of important ethnic differences in thera- with or without surgical intervention in intensive care. Nota-
pies of ICU patients (4) and that black patients are almost bly, these meta-analyses were statistically very heterogeneous,
three times more likely than white patients to die in-hospital which indicates the need for caution in interpreting pooled
following admission to the ICU (5). Additionally, lack of health estimates (1). As is known, types of specific diseases, sever-
insurance is associated with increased risk of hospital mortal- ity of sickness, and management in critically ill patients may
ity in ICU patients. Thus, we cannot exclude possibility that have diverse impacts of body mass index (BMI) on the hospital
these factors would have contributed to their results. mortality. For instance, some meta-analyses conversely dem-
Third, their study design did not include the detail about onstrated that obesity is associated with higher risks of ICU
therapies of ICU patients. Consequently, it is difficult to esti- death among severely traumatic patients and those with 2009
mate the degree to which interventions by ICU physicians H1N1 infection (2, 3).
might have influenced outcomes. From a clinical stand- In addition, we have identified the severity of Glasgow Coma
point, obese patients have more physical care requirements. Scale or Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Examination

e80 www.ccmjournal.org January 2014 Volume 42 Number 1

Vous aimerez peut-être aussi