Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
This piece of writing was overall well written and informative. The style and language in
which it was written were adequate to the desired type of reader, which is a non-specialist
in the Finance. I have a good overall impression on the grammar, punctuation and
elaboration of ideas. The text reads fluidly despite small improvable sentences, and ideas
The most important positive point of this piece of writing is that it effectively
addressed Unit Ones prompt. Seung Ha clearly described the key elements of
the field comunicate with each other. The paper states the aim of the website from the
beginning, which sets the tone for easy reading at later parts of the text. In the same way,
Seung Ha is also concrete in describing the overall funtion of the article, which adds even
The first and most important mistake in the text is that it would require a more
engaging style to make the reader more interested in InvestmentNews. Finance is often a
hard field to understand, and it becomes sterile and unwelcoming if it is not presented in a
reader-friendly way. This article could be extremely enriched by a few more interesting
examples, colourful adjectives and other stylistic elements. It can be seen that Seung Ha
intended this article to be extremely objective, and that goal is perfectly achieved, but one
Secondly, the text lacks a strong conclusion. Seung Has article seems to finish
abruptly without giving the reader a final overarching thought to think about. In my
opinion, it is essential for every text to leave a lasting impression, a footprint that will
ENGW 3304 Miguel de Almansa Peso Peer Review Unit 1
provoke one last thought on the reader. This can be a clear summary of the ideas presented,
anecdote or a humorous (but relevant) comment. In this case, it could have been a few
sentences supporting the opinion that this website constitutes a form of expression for a
communicate with each other in the community by presenting facts objectively and without
clearly make the goal of paragraphs known to the reader and to explain what acronyms
stand for (i.e. IMO). As mentioned above, the reader is not necessarily a Finance specialist,
and could easily struggle with terms that are alien to him/her.
After the careful analysis of Seung Has text, I can conclude that I admire the
thoughtfulness of his ideas and the precision of his language. It has been especially
interesting to see how Seung Ha has adopted the same style in which his discourse