en HELD: CASE: Toom saitached by Fixture Holland v Hodgson (1872) bolts and nuts Machinery ina Fixture Goh Chong Hin v Consolidaied Malay Fubar factory Ina rubber Estates Sin Bhd, (1924-1928) estate attachad oy bolts and nuts Underground Fisture ‘Shell Co. oF the Federation of Malaya v petro! tanks Com missioner of the Federal Capital of KL buried 2feet [1964] below ground lavel wrted over with concrete Bulkpaim-oil Fixture Goorin Co.Ltd. VChairman, Keng Town Council storage tanks, [1964] vertical cylinders resting on pre-cag, cconorate pillars Offset printing Fixture Wiggins Teape (M) San. Bhd. vBahagia Trading machines attixed Sdn. Bhd. & Ors, [1980] by boltstothe tloor Overhead cranes Fistures ‘Material Trading Pie Uta [in Liquidation) v.DBS attached to stea! Finance Ltd (1988) runwayson floor of awarehouss ‘Air-conditioning Chalier ‘Sungel Way Leasing San Bhd. v Lin Seng unit ‘eusiom Properties Sdn. Bhd. & Ors[1989] made’ fora shopping complex but subjectto a hire purchase agreement with Romallpa clause’ Dyeing machines Chaitel Bt Finance Bhd Grobal Pactie Textilewith legs cemented on 2 raised cement platform, removal of which would not cause materia| damage. Soject to ‘Fomalpa clause’ in equipment ease agreamant Industries Sin. Bid [1993] Printing machines standing on their own weight Chattel Hulme v Brigham & Anor. [1843] 0 Tapestry Chatter Leigh v Taylor (1901) 1 Ch 523 T ‘Marble statuas of lions in an Engi garden sianding on theirown weight res D’ Exncourt v Gregory (1866)LR 3 Bq 382 12. Plush ip-up sais in blocks of 4 and Battachedto the floor ot acinema by iron standards with iron feet Fixtures Vaudeville Electric Cinema v. Muriset [1923] 2. Ch. 74 ie Pecuresin frames allachedinio recessesin the wall Chattels Berkley v Poulett (1977) EGD 754 1% Escalatorsin shopping complex hoisted into place weight Fixtures People’s Park Chinatown Devp. Pte Lid. (in Liquidation) v Schindler's Lifts (S) Pte Ltd. [1993] 1 SIR 591