Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Andrew S. Bambach
Madonna University
[SHORTENED TITLE UP TO 50 CHARACTERS] 2
Abstract
[SHORTENED TITLE UP TO 50 CHARACTERS] 3
The Industrial Revolution, is considered one of the greatest movements in all of mankind.
Scientists and inventors harnessed energy from Earths recourses and turned these raw materials
into living machines. It changed how people lived their lives. There was no longer a demand for
large amounts of people to pick cotton, work in textiles, plow fields, or mill wood. Machines had
taken the place of humans and animal power, and changed the culture of how civilization lived.
Instead of having to cross the country by horse and wagon which took months appam months,
people could than hop on a train and get there in a matter of weeks. This revolution took people
from living on farmers to city dwellers living in high rises. This change would only deepen as
technological advances got more sophisticated. Now with an even newer age of globalization
people are becoming even more far-fetched from where all their goods come from. It has gotten
to the point that if a child asks their parents where the food they eat comes from they tell the
child the grocery store, because they themselves dont even know where their food comes from.
People are even starting to fear the food they eat, because science has biologically changed the
food we grow to be mass produced and is causing people to be ill or even die. This disconnect
has raised the eyes of American citizens across the country and even people all around the globe.
People are now starting to stand up against the system or industrialized agriculture and have a
say in what is in their food and where it comes from. The disconnect of farm to table and
industrialization of farming genetically modified organisms has led to a resurgence of going back
to localized sustainable food sources and producing and eating larger amounts of locally grown
food that people know where it was grown and who grew is quickly sweeping across the country
What started this movement and why has this caught the eyes of so many American
citizens? There isnt just one event that caused people to want this movement. Anyone individual
could have flocked to this cultural movement for any number of personal reasons. Whether its
they wish to eat healthier, feel responsible for their childrens health, dont support the inhumane
ways large scale farms treat livestock, or just the simple reasoning for wanting to know where
their food comes from. Whatever reasoning, they all support locally raised and grow food.
Patricia Allen said it best in her article in the Oxford Academic saying, For alternative agrifood
environmental, social and economic issues in the food system. (Allen 1). People are beginning
to see the positive affect of what localizing food does. Its not only just a way to eat healthier, but
it allows people living in the same community to interact and share ideas and thoughts. Whether
its sharing ideas on how to cook a chicken they just bought from the farmer down the road, to
talking to the farmer that raised the chicken and learning that anyone can keep a couple of
chickens in their backyard. Today, people have lost many social skills because of the advances in
technology and social networking. People dont interact face to face like they used to, and having
a more localized community that does interact like that makes for happier citizens. Perhaps
people want to help play their part in protecting the environment. In fact, according to Time A
2006 report from the Food and Agriculture Organization estimated that livestock were
responsible for about 18% of human-caused greenhouse gases (Walsh 1). Eighteen percent!
Thats nearly a quarter of our greenhouse gas produced. This statistic is not even including the
pollution caused by the transportation, butchering, and mass production of the meat.
Furthermore, the localization makes economic sense for a lot of people. Now depending where
you live and time of year produce will vary in price but typically the prices are very similar and
[SHORTENED TITLE UP TO 50 CHARACTERS] 5
in a lot of cases the produce can be cheaper at the farmers market. Whatever reason someone
has for supporting the localization sustainable food system they all have the same goal of living
Localized sustainable farming sounds nice and its a good idea but what about the people
that live in cities miles from the nearest farmer? Or what about the people less fortunate living in
poverty living pay check to pay check? How can these people be a part of the movement? Well
look at the MUFI or The Michigan Urban Farm Initiative. MUFI is a nonprofit organization that
looks the engage members of the Michigan community in sustainable agriculture. MUFI is
taking vacant lots located in Detroits North end and developing a two-square-block radius into
an urban farm. It is one-hundred percent volunteer run and its goal is to educate the community,
sustainability, and minimizing socioeconomic disparity. Localized sustainable farming isnt just
for people that can afford to buy locally grown produce. With a little community support, even
one of the most impoverished cities in the United States can work towards sustainability. Sadly,
Detroit has the most upside for the movement because of how much foreclosed land there is
within the city. To put it in terms The Detroit News released an article stating To get a sense of
the loss, consider all the houses in Warren, Livonia, Royal Oak, Southfield, and Allen Park.
Empty them. The number is still less than all the foreclosures in Detroit. (Kurth, MacDonald).
While this comes as a depressing fact, plots of land are selling for less than a thousand dollars
and urban farming initiatives like the MUFI are taking advantages of these vacant lots and using
them to improve the community. Like the saying goes one mans trash is another mans treasure.
The Michigan Urban Farming Initiative is just one example of how localized sustainability is
local farms projected harvest. There is a bit of risk in this because customers typically pay the
farmers before the growing season and run the risk of weather or other implements destroying
the crops. However, it is a great way to for people that want the farm to table food. They get to
meet the person growing their food and interact with them. According to the USDA they estimate
there are as many as two-thousand five-hundred CSAs throughout the US. CSAs not only help
consumers buy locally grown food but they help ensure in the preservation of local small
farmers. CSA members ensure small farmers can stay in business and the money they spend on
the produce stays local and within the local economy. This initial capital at the beginning ensures
the farmer will make money on their crop in terms when it comes to harvest time they dont need
to charge a buffer for insurance. Overall CSAs are continuing to grow in popularity ensuring
local small town farmers wont be run out of business by the large scale industrial farms.
What about the people that dont have farmers markets, community initiatives, or CSAs?
Well these people take matters into their own hands. These people pick up the pitchfork, put on
their boots and grow their own food. Instead of it being a farm to table, its a few steps to table.
In fact, a small family living in the metropolis of Pasadena grew six thousand pounds of food in
one year, and they only live on one tenth of an acre. Thats about the size of a normal suburban
lot or even smaller. This family could almost solely live off all the food that they produce in a
year. Yet, for the people that live in an apartment or dont live on a lot, they still make the most
with what they have. Whether its growing plants out of their window ledge or using growing
lights. The movement towards locally grown food is growing on people and communities are
While the localized sustainable food source movement continues to grow, there are still
people that have their doubts on to how large of a scale this movement can get. Other critiques
also believe there is nothing wrong with the food system now and how it is produced. Modern
farmings goal is to produce the largest amount of food in the shortest time possible. They are
doing this by using science to genetically modify plants and animals to grow quicker and larger.
Mark Lynas who helped start the protests against GMOs said, people who want to stick with
organic are entitled tobut they should not stand in the way of others who would use science to
find more efficient ways to feed billions. The genetic literacy project went on to say Such
technology could eliminate the current organic practice of planting legume cover crops, which
are subsequently plowed down to trap nitrogen in the soil. This could cut an organic farmers
fuel bill by as much as 50 percent! (Wager). The pro GMO critiques say that consumers are
more likely to get hit by an asteroid than hurt by genetically modified food. Everyone from the
European Union (EU) to the World Health Organization (WHO), National Academies of Science
(NAS), Health Canada to the local Vancouver Coastal Health Authority (VCHA) agree there is
no evidence of harm from consuming food made with GM ingredients. (Wagner). So really can
the industrial farming and GMOs be bad for people if all the governments all around the world
allow for it to continue. The GMO activists even take it one step further taking aim at the organic
farming and criticizing them for their lack of sanitation. Pointing out one case in particular, In
one notorious recent case involving the finding of a novel strain of O104:H4 (E.coli) bacteria
linked to an organic farm in Lower Saxony in Germany in 2011, 3,950 people were affected and
53 died. (Wagner). Industrialized farming and GMOs are the leaders in in food production and
supply food to millions of people all around the world. So really how bad are GMOs and factory
[SHORTENED TITLE UP TO 50 CHARACTERS] 8
farms for people and why is it such a debate? With all of this said People are still moving
So, why do so many people question the scientists that created genetically modified
organisms and the pro factory farm activists? Well, for starts while all these people say nothing is
wrong with the way they grow, this food and it has so health effects. How much do they really
know? GMOs have only been around for twenty years. Twenty years is not a long enough time to
tell whether or not these foods will have an impact on consumers health. The other argument
about the health risks isnt even involved with the biological makeup of the plants and animals.
Its about what these farms are using to grow the livestock and crops. The farms that raise
livestock treat them with hormones and antibiotics to prevent disease and maximize growth. The
scary thing is that these hormones and antibiotics stay in the animals and animal products that
consumers eat. By the 1970s, researchers began warning regulators that routine use of
antibiotics powerless against deadly infections. (AP). The problem with this is the lack of
knowledge that consumers have on the food that they purchase at the supermarkets. Not only
does this style of agriculture affect the health of the consumer but it hurts the local economies.
These large-scale farms are subsidized by the United States government allowing them to afford
these large quantities with all of the modern expensive machinery. But how is this hurting the
local small scale farmers? Well these large-scale farms grow so much good that they can
drastically reduce the price per pound of food that they grow. This leaves the small farms
scrambling to stay in competition with them driving down their prices which in terms results in a
greater loss of revenue. Ninety percent of the food grown in the United States comes from family
farms. But this is bit of a miss conception. While the statistic is true, the majority of the ninety
[SHORTENED TITLE UP TO 50 CHARACTERS] 9
percent comes from family farms that once used to be conventional farms but have gotten lost
in the mix of industrialized farming technics. Many small farms cant keep up with these factory
farms and end up becoming bankrupt. This has scared so many people away from the agriculture
industry and is gradually starting to threaten it. According to the Labor Department, the median
age for farmers and ranchers is 55.9 years (Kurtzleben). The average age of the American
farmer is almost sixty years old. Thats the age at which most people are retiring. The last
reasoning as to why the industrialized farming has become so bad for so many people is due in
part to the fact that there is no communal or social aspect to it. Nowadays people drive to the
supermarket pick up the food they want to eat and drive back home. There is no social aspect to
it or community engagement. In all the localized sustainable food movement not only provides
consumers with a healthier source of food, but they help stimulate the local economy and create
Localized sustainable food is the movement of the future to ensure a sense of security and
overall wellbeing for local communities. It educates the future generations on where the food
they eat comes from and how it is grown. The money used to buy the locally grown food is
continuously being recycled back into the local economy to help keep it stabilized and thriving.
Local communities create stronger bonds and ties within itself to create a strong support system.
With the industrialized farming industry having questionable farming techniques, local
communities can come together to ensure a healthier future not only for themselves but for their
community and local economy. Local sustainability creates a sense of security within the
community ensuring that if anything were to happen to the food industry they would have a
means for being able to provide for themselves and their surrounding neighbors. With all this
[SHORTENED TITLE UP TO 50 CHARACTERS] 10
being said the cultural movement towards local sustainable food is growing in popularity and
Too bad you opted for this manner of report rather than the one
suggested in class--an assertion, support for assertion, offer
complexities to your assertion and then evolve into a new more
accurate assertion. But there is still time.
[SHORTENED TITLE UP TO 50 CHARACTERS] 11
References
Allen, P. (2010, May 14). Realizing justice in local food systems. Retrieved March 29,
abstract/3/2/295/446514/Realizing-justice-in-local-food-systems
Kurth, J., & MacDonald, C. (2015, June 25). Volume of abandoned homes 'absolutely terrifying'
reports/2015/05/14/detroit-abandoned-homes-volume-terrifying/27237787/
Walsh, B. (2013, December 16). The Triple Whopper Environmental Impact of Global Meat
triple-whopper-environmental-impact-of-global-meat-production/
Wager, R., Popoff, M., & Moore, P. (2013, October 17). Organics versus GMO: Why the debate?
https://www.geneticliteracyproject.org/2013/10/15/organics-versus-gmo-why-the-debate/
A. (2012, April 20). Are antibiotics in meat bad for humans? Retrieved March 30, 2017,
from http://www.cbsnews.com/news/are-antibiotics-in-meat-bad-for-humans/
[SHORTENED TITLE UP TO 50 CHARACTERS] 12
[SHORTENED TITLE UP TO 50 CHARACTERS] 13