Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
This indicates the importance and relevance of balance among life forces.
Whenever the balance is disrupted the life forces can become destructive forces.
The same thread of thought runs in so many powerful human approaches such as
the,”Middle Path” of Buddha. The foundation of the middle path philosophy is the
balance between living activities.
This thread extends to the concept of,” Balance of power”. Democracy survives
because of the balance of power among different democratic institutions such as
judiciary and parliament. If the balance of power is disrupted and excessive power
gets concentrated in one institution it leads to demagoguery and exploitation. This
thread of thought is so large that it connects even unrelated entities. In the
movie,”star wars”, the power which was optimally distributed among the senate
got concentrated in the hands of one, who inadvertently assumed the role of
emperor. Democracy was subverted.
Thus balance plays a key role in the optimal survival capability of human kind.
If this balance does not exist between work and life, it is bound to have a
downward spiraling impact on performance as well as quality of life.
Let us examine a few cases of “Work-Life imbalance” and see what we can learn
from them:
A textile co. had a 6 day week and the daily work timing was from 9.00am to 5.45
pm. One of the professed human resource objectives of the top management was
to develop the habit of late working among executives and managers. Thus, it was
common for some executives to work till 8 pm. For 6 days a week and there were
some enthusiastic souls who would come for a couple of hours on Sunday too. On
the face of it this seems to be a good state of affairs. Everybody is working so
hard to make the organization successful. Intense karm yogis are continuously at
work. However, as we dig below the surface the real state of affairs emerges. The
actual amount of work done by the organizational personnel is at-most 2-3 hrs.
The rest of the time is spent in gossiping, politicking and light banter. The
objective of al executive personnel is to reach office on time. Subsequently, the
pace is leisurely in terms of tea, some chatting and more tea.
So,if the top management perceives that they can get more work out of the
executive personnel by increasing the amount of time at the work place, they are
completely off the mark.. This, in fact breeds complacency, people become
impervious to change and small events tend to get blown out of proportions. Since
organizational personnel spend a lot of time gossiping, small events get blown out
of proportion. In case one of the female employees is spending some time with
one of the male employees, it will become the talk of the entire organization. This
is one of the consequences of the work-life imbalance forced on the employees by
their managements under the mistaken assumption that more time spent in the
office means more work and hence greater organizational efficiency.
The questions that arise are
,”What is the dynamics of the correlation between time spent in the office and
productivity?”
“Is the law of diminishing returns as applicable to the amount of time spent in
office as in economics?”
Let us draw a comparison between “work-life balance based productivity” and
work-life imbalance based productivity”
In order to facilitate comparison, we need to convert the different value adding
activities that we do in our office into units of work.
Case 1: Insy Consulting
The different value adding activities in the value chain and associated units of
work are given in the table below:
Arun, a consultant with Insy consulting does the following activities on a regular
workday:
Since Arun is not able to complete his work upto his satisfaction, so he usually
puts in 1 hr. of work at his home office before sleeping. The activity done during
this time, is blog/website updation. Therefore Arun’s total productivity is
8.75.Arun undertakes this activity and continuously sacrifices his interests in book
reading, music and sports.
Learning Points:
On analyzing Arun’s case the following learning points come to the fore:
Workday productivity=18.75
This level of productivity is two times the productivity that Arun is currently
achieving in spite of indulging in work-life imbalance. The redesigned set of
activities includes the work activities that Arun was doing in the evening at
his home. Thus, if Arun redesigns the set of activities at his workplace, he can
not only increase his productivity by 100%, he can also restore his work-life
balance.
The value adding activities and the value added by each activity would
have a tendency to change over time as the overall yearly goal and the business
environment changes.
Therefore, the macro-competencies which subsume the micro-
competencies mentioned above are:
• Focusing
The ability to identify the year end focus.
• Planning
The ability to map the activities to be done in order to
realize the year end focus.
• Organizing plan execution.
The ability to create a activity-person-time chart in order to
catalyze execution of plan.
• Organizing the work place.
Creating organization at the work place so that useful items
can be found and useless items do not get in the way of
productive effort.
• Concentrating on the focus.
Avoiding dispersed thinking in order to reduce wastage of
talent.
The key learning imparted to the personnel was that they need to devote
more time to Q2 activities so that the percentage of time spent in Q1 is
reduced thereby reducing the occurrence of crises.
Though the analysis is interesting and has its value, it suffers from one
major blind spot.
The life quadrant is completely missing from the analysis.
The entire analysis is of urgent and important tasks whereas life
giving activities such as watching the sunset or reading an interesting
book or playing the violin or listening to music are not even part of
the perception.
Exports department:
At 5.15 everyday the head of exports calls in his team and gives
them tasks to occupy them for the next one –two hrs. The dominant
grievance is ,”We were sitting idle for at least half the day. Why couldn’t
the tasks be given to us at that time? Why are the tasks being given to us at
5.15 when the time to go home is coming near?”
On his part the head of exports is giving them tasks at that time because he
wants the top management to believe that his team is awfully busy and
dedicated.
IT Department:
The head of IT is in office from 8.45 to 7 everyday. He spends his
time in the office .What kind of activities he is doing is not known? He is
seen chatting with materials personnel and other senior personnel daily for
at least 2 hrs.
Marketing department:
In the marketing department, the executives are observed chatting
and discussing palmistry for at least half the work day.
Training department:
The training department executives are busy during training days
but on non-training days they are observed moving from department to
department chatting and even reading fiction during office hours.
This is work life imbalance of the worst sort. Personnel are spending
more time in the office but there productivity is stagnant and even
declining. The zest for life and improvement is missing. This is what
happens when work life imbalance extends beyond a sustainable
point. People are working in name only. There is only an appearance
of work happening. Rather than tapping the talent of personnel such
a work culture kills it.