2 e @ ORIGINAL THOMAS F. FRIEDBERG, ESQ. (#110439) LAW OFFICES OF FRIEDBERG & BUNGE 610 WEST ASH STREET, SUITE 1400 FILED P.O. BOX 6814 Oy Court SAN DIEGO, CA 92166-0814 Mo' tes ang (619) 557-0101 Nov ee ‘Attomeys for Plaintiffs ee SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES STANLEY MOSK COURTHOUSE GUY FAUTEUX and SHELIA FAUTEUX, | CASENO. BC6 39261 individually as Heirs at Law to Decedent, Tabatha Fauteux, COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES Plaintiffs, ABQ g W417, 2% v. Tru, S49, NARCONON INTERNATIONAL, 1a ASSOCIATION FOR BETTER LIVING AND 2018 O50, i EDUCATION INTERNATIONAL, and DOES “TY 04 T through L, inclusive, 7 2g Defendants. ALLEGATIONS COMMON TO ALL CAUSES OF ACTION Plaintiffs, GUY FAUTEUX and SHELIA FAUTEUX allege as follows: 1, Plaintiffs, GUY FAUTEUX and SHELIA FAUTEUX, are, and at all @ as heirs at law to decedent, Tabatha Fauteux, pursuant to California Code orc 377.60. 2. Plaintiffs are informed and believe, and based thereupon allege, that veda NARCONON INTERNATIONAL, and DOES I through XX, and each of them, (*? NARCONON) are, and at all times herein mentioned were, corporations or subsidiaries thereof, dulglicenséa and. 3 238 aa z og} 88 Feuteux v. Narconon COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES - PAGE 1 FAB LT 19zee9082 10 ul 12 13 14 15 16 7 18 19 20 au 22 23 24 25 26 2 28 operating within the State of California, and are, and were, transacting business within the County of Los Angeles, State of California. 3. Plaintiffs are informed and believe, and based thereupon allege, that Defendants, ASSOCIATION FOR BETTER LIVING AND EDUCATION INTERNATIONAL, and DOES XXI through L, and each of them, (“ABLE”) are, and at all times herein mentioned were, corporations or subsidiaries thereof, duly licensed and operating within the State of California, and are, and were, transacting business within the County of Los Angeles, State of California. 4, The true names and capacities, whether corporate, associate, health care provider, nurse, medical personnel and/or practitioner, agent, employee or otherwise of Defendants herein named as a DOE, and each of them, are unknown to Plaintiffs, who therefore sues such defendants, and each of them, by their fictitious names. Plaintiffs will amend this complaint to allege their true names and capacities when they have been ascertained. Plaintiffs are informed and believes, and based thereupon allege, that each such of fictitiously named defendants is responsible in some ‘manner for the occurrences herein alleged, and that Plaintiffs? injuries and damages, as herein alleged, were proximately caused by Defendants, and each of them. 5. Plaintiffs are informed and believe, and based thereupon allege, that at all timesherein mentioned, all of the Defendants, and each of them, were the agents, employees, assistants and/or consultants of the remaining co-defendants, and of each other, and as such, were acting within the ‘course and scope of their employment, agency and authority for each other, and with the knowledge and consent of their remaining co-defendants, and each of them; and when Defendants, and each of them, were acting as principals, Defendants, and each of them, were negligent in their selection, employment, retention, as well as the supervision of each and every other Defendant as its agent, employee, assistant and/or consultant. 6. Plaintiffs are informed and believe, and based thereupon allege, that Defendants, NARCONON, licenses, operates and/or otherwise directs and oversees drug rehabilitation facilities throughout the United States, and in particular, within the County of Los Angeles, State of California. 7. PlaintifiS are informed and believe, and based thereupon allege, that Defendants, Fauteus v. Narconon COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES - PAGE 23 o MW 2 13 4 16 7 18 19 20 ai 2 23 24 25 26 oi 28 ABLE, is an umbrella group that oversees the drug rehabilitation, education and training programs of Defendants NARCONON. 8. Plaintiffs are informed and believes, and based thereupon allege, that both NARCONON and ABLE rely exclusively upon the written “technology” of L. Ron Hubbard (“Hubbard”), the founder ofthe Church of Scientology, to address the drugand alcohol rehabilitation needs of persons involved with the Narconon programs. Defendants ABLE was established by the Church of Scientology to promote the secular works of Hubbard. 9, Plaintiffs are informed and believe, and based thereupon allege, that Defendants NARCONON and ABLE use their programs as recruitment tools for the Church of Scientology and recruits its members from the ranks of former students who have attended NARCONON’s drug rehabilitation program. The former students are invited to become “trainers” and are recruited and brought to Los Angeles and placed in an apartment owned and maintained by ABLE during their training period. While in training, the recruits are pressured to join the Church of Scientology. During this process, the recruits, who are former addicts of drugs such as heroin, are provided herbs that are intended to mimic certain of the highs of heroin, including Kratom, FIRST CAUSE OF ACTION (Wrongful Death) 10, Plaintiffs reallege paragraph I through 9, and incorporate the same hereof as though fully set forth herein. 11, In orabout July 2014, Plaintiffs daughter, Tabatha Fauteux (“Tabatha”), went into rug rehabilitation for heroin addiction at Narconon’s Harlington, Texas facility. Tabatha completed the drug rehabilitation program and was recruited to stay on to recruit and assist with new students enrolled in the Narconon program and was hired as an employee of Narconon Fresh Start and was paid a nominal wage. Her duties included, among other things, monitoring students in Narconon’s sauna program, 12, In or about August 2015, Tabitha was asked by her employer to go to NARCONON which was located in Los Angeles for further training. Upon arrival in Los Angeles, Tabatha was taken to an apartment where other “trainers” were staying located at the Oakwood Apartments at Fautouxv. Nareonon (COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES - PAGE 310 ul 2 13 4 15 16 7 18 19 20 a1 2 2B 4 25 6 27 28 3600 Barham Boulevard in Los Angeles, California. The apartment was rented and provided to Tabatha by ABLE. 13, While in Los Angeles, Tabatha went to ABLE on a daily basis and spent between 12 to 18 hours per day at ABLE. While at ABLE, Tabatha was exposed and pressured to join the Church of Scientology. During these sessions, Tabatha was provided with Kratom by employees of Defendants NARCONON and ABLE, Kratom is a herb that in lower doses, isa stimulant drug that ‘may increase focus, attention, energy, and alertness while in higher doses, it may produce a pleasant and mellow “high” similar to opioid drugs. Plaintiffs are informed and believes, and based thereupon alleges, that the personnel at NARCONON and ABLE did not have the requisite knowledge, ‘raining, education or experience in the fields of drug and alcohol rehabilitation and either failed to recognize the dangers of providing former heroin addicts with Kratom that can mimic certain of the effects of opioid drugs, such as heroin, or alternatively, acted in a conscious disregard for the health, safety and welfare of the trainers, including Tabatha, by providing herbal drugs knowing thet by doing so, the trainers, including Tabatha, would be placed at greater risk for repeat use of opioid drugs, including heroin. 14, While participating asa “trainer” at NARCONON and ABLE, Tabatha was provided Kratom by personnel of NARCONON and ABLE. Tabatha was also pressured while participating as a “trainer” to join the Church of Scientology. Tabatha resisted and rejected the tenants of the Church of Scientology, but was being controlled and directed by Defendants since her apartment was, being provided by Defendants, 12 to 18 hours each day Tabatha was exposed to and pressured to join the Church of Seientology and Defendants were providing herbal drugs that caused or contributed to her relapsing to heroin use, all during which time Tabatha was in a drug rehabilitation facility operated and run by Defendants. 15, Plaintiffs are informed and believes, and based thereupon allege, that due to the conduct of Defendants, Tabatha was impliedly under the control of Defendants, during which time she relapsed back to heroin use. On November 6, 2015, Tabatha overdosed on heroin and died. 16. Defendants, and each of them, acted negligently and carelessly and proximately caused and contributed to the death of Tabatha by: Fauteuxv. Narconon (COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES - PAGE 4& So we aan u 12 13 14 15 16 "7 18 19 20 21 2 B 4 25 26 27 28 a, failing to provide reasonable and adequate supervision of its trainers and staff; b. failing to exercise proper care in the selection, hiring and retention ofits employees and staff, ©. failing to prevent the promotion and use of herbal drugs by its employees; d. failing to take action to prevent its employees providing herbal drugs to “trainees” such as Tabatha, knowing that the “trainees” and, and were, former drug addicts; e. placing its “trainees” in a position whereby the trainees would be controlled and directed by controlling their place of residence, controlling their activities during the day and exposing the trainees to recruitment to the Church of Scientology under the of drug treatment and rehabilitation; a using trainers who had previously failed the Narconon program and retumed to drug use as supervisors and role models for the trainees, such as Tabatha, thereby increasing the probability that Tabatha would return to drug use. 17. Plaintifis are informed and believes, and based thereupon alleges, that the conduct of Defendants, as hereinabove alleged, was negligent and careless and contributed and/or caused ‘Tabatha to relapse to using heroin and overdose, thereby causing her death. Plaintiffs are informed and believe, and based thereupon allege that there are additional areas in which Defendants, and each of them, acted negligently. Plaintiffs will supplement the allegations ofthis Complaint to include the additional areas of negligence. 18. Atall times herein mentioned, Plaintiffs, GUY FAUTEUX and SHELIA FAUTEUX, were the parents of Decedent, Tabatha Fauteux and were dependent upon decedent for their support, ‘maintenance, care, comfort, society, affection and love. At all times herein mentioned, Decedent, ‘Tabatha Fauteux, was faithful and dutiful daughter to Plaintiffs, GUY FAUTEUX and SHELIA FAUTEUX. 19, Asa direct and proximate result of the acts of Defendants, and each of them, as hereinabove alleged, and the resulting death of Tabatha Fauteux, Decedent's heirs, Plaintiff, GUY FAUTEUX and SHELIA FAUTEUX, have sustained pecuniary and non-pecuniary loses resulting from the loss of society, comfort, affection, services, love, support and maintenance of Decedent, Feauteux v. Narconon COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES - PAGE 5Ree Sy Cas 10 Tt 2 13 14 16 7 18 19 20 2 2 23 24 25 26 27 28 Tabatha Fauteux, in an amount as yet unaséertained, but in excess of Twenty Five Thousand (625,000.00) and within the jurisdiction of this Court. Plaintiffs pray leave of Court to insert the actual and/or reasonable value of Plaintiffs’ pecuniary loses when ascertained, or to prove same at time of trial. 20. Asa further direct and proximate result of the acts of Defendants, and each of them, as hereinabove alleged, Decedent's heirs, Plaintiffs, GUY FAUTEUX and SHELIA FAUTEUX, have incurred funeral and burial expenses in an amount as yet unascertained. Plaintiffs pray leave of Court to amend and/or supplement this Complaint to insert the actual and/or reasonable value of such funeral and burial expenses when ascertained, or to prove same at time of trial SECOND CAUSE OF ACTION (Gross Negligence) 21. Plaintiffs reallege paragraph 1 through 20, and incorporate the same hereof as though fully set forth herein. 22, Plaintiffs are informed and believe, and based thereupon allege, that tall times herein mentioned, Defendants, and each of them, knew that asa result of their course of conductin bringing Tabatha to Los Angeles asa “trainee” knowing that Tabatha was a former heroin addict, controlling Tabatha’s living environment with knowledge that Tabatha was in effect being held hostage by Defendants, pressuring Tabatha to join the Church of Scientology and in providing herbal drugs to mimic the effects of opioid drugs, including heroin, would likely result in Tabatha relapsing to using heroin 23, Plaintiffs are informed and believes, and based thereupon allege, that in doing the things herein alleged, Defendants managing agents, officers and/or directors participated in the conduct alleged, and did so with their knowledge that their conduct was likely to cause harm to Tabatha. 24, Plaintiff are further informed and believe, and based thereupon alleges Defendants, and each of them, acted with the intent of causing harm to Tabatha and in so doing, acted with a conscious disregard forthe life, health and safety of Tabatha, and further acted with despicably, maliciously and oppressively, thereby entitling Plaintiffs to an award of punitive and exemplary Fauteux v. Narconon (COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES - PAGE 6o 10 Ml 12 2B 4 15 16 7 18 19 20 2 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 damages, all in an amount to be proven at time of trial WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs pray judgment against Defendants, and each of them, as follows: 1. Forgeneral damages in an amount within the jurisdiction of this Court and in excess of $25,000.00, and in an amount to be proven at the time of trial; 2. For special damages for loss of support and maintenance, all in an amount to be proven at the time of trial; 3. For funeral and burial expenses, all in an amount to be proven at the time of trial; 4. Formedical and related expenses, all in an amount to be proven at the time of trial; 5. For exemplary and punitive damages, all in an amount to be proven at time of trial; 6. For cost of suit incurred herein; and 7. For such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper. LAW OFFICES OF FRIEDBERG & BUNGE DATED: November 1, 2016 Feuteux v. Narconon (COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES - PAGE 7~ e @ORIGINAL Pia EEE AEE == a Peivin ar usa bance SNSEL SUAS Tama sopON og Hato ‘Texgpwowe no: 619-557-0101 saxo: 619-557-0560 jounty of Los Angeles _arronwey ron ane) Plaintiff ~ {uPeRio cour oF cauronwa.cousnv or LOS ANGELES NOV 012016 svreercoress: 111 NORTH HILL STREET : \MAIUNG ADORESS: ‘Short A. ve OtficerClerk cervavoze cove LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90012 ay, asty seuicunne. CENTRAL DIVISION hale sai FAUTEUX, etal. v. NARCONON INTERNATIONAL, et al. IVIL CASE cover ‘SHEET ‘Complex Case Designation trices Se eles — ee (counter 2 sinder | Cee. Sie, | rnsunttgnsray tt recede 425000) SoFcoDorless)| "(Cal Russ arCounndeSaal) | com | TTems 1-6 below must be completed (soe instructions on page 2). ‘Chack one box below forthe case type that best describes this case: ‘Auto Tort Contract, Provisionaly Complex Cit Litgation tees ("breach otconrecuwaranty (06) (Gal Rulos of Cour, rules L4DD"3 403) Uninsured moors (46) (1 ate 3.740 colectons (09) AnitrusTradereguation (08) ‘Other PUPDIND (Persona njuryiPropery — [__] otnercatections (00) (EJ construction defect (10) ‘Damage/Wrongful Death) Tort I inswance coverage (18) CI Wass tort 40 Asbestos (0) ( oberconac 7) S secuitestigaton 26 Product abit 24) Real Property (F eiroamertaToxi tot (20) Medial mabractin (45) [21 Eminent domsinivere TT nsuranee coverage cans asing tom the Othe PIPDID (23) ccodereaton (1) Stove sted poveraly samp eace Non PUPOAWO (Other Tor TF) engi evieson 3) types et) Busnes otuntr busines practice (7) CL) tesa propery (28) Entgeement of Judament 2) cnt sights (08) Uniawful Detainer (2 Entorcamentofuagment (20) Defamation (13) LJ commeriat (31) Miscellaneous Civil Complaint Fraud (18) CI restr (2) J rico en) Inet! propery 18) TO ons 29 ‘ther emia (nat pected oboe) (2) Professional negligence (25) juditl Review Miscetaneous Chil Petition (ther nen-PUPONND tr (35) CF asset tree 05) Parneship and corporate governance 21) Exyoment TE Petion e:abivaton award (11) [=] ter peition (nt spected above) (43) ‘Wrongful eminaton 26) (5) wor mancte 2) Toner employment (15) [othe ict revew 36) 2 Thiscase Lis [7Tisnot — complex under rule 3,400 of the Califomia Rules of Court. Ifthe case is complex, mark the [Bos tig encoponal jul nanapeet a. Large nunber of separate represented partes ¢] Large numberof winesses © [1] emensve moton pracioe rang affcut or novel 2, —] Coordination with elated acon pending inane or mor courts issue that wil be tino-consuring to reacve inoter counties, tats or counts, ova fedora out «(2 Substantial amount of camertary evidence] Substartialposhudprent ual suprsston 3. Remedies sought (check all that apply): a7] monetary b.[_] nonmonetary; declaratory or injunctive relief ¢. CZ punitive 4. Number of causes of action (specify: 2 5. Thiscase [lis isnot a class action suit 6. Ifthere are any known related cases, fle and serve a notice of related case. (Yof! may use form CM-015) Sate: November 1. 2016 “THOMAS F. FRIEDBERG, ESQ. s TE oR TT ¢ NOTICE «+ Plintilf must fe this cover shest with the fst paper fied inthe action or roveeding (oxcabtsfnal claims cases or cases fled under the Probate Cod, Family Codo, or Welfare and insttutons Code). (Ca. Rules of Court, rule 3.220, Fallure to fle may esut in sancbons + File this cover sheet in ation 1o any cover sheet equited by local court ue + I this case is complex under rule 3400 et sea, ofthe Caliomia Rules of Cour, you must serve copy ofthis cover sheet onal ctr pares tothe acon or proceeding, + Unless tis is @ collections case under rule 3.749 ora copex case, tis cover sheet wl be used for saisical purposes ony. TBE aU fo= Pap GR ATTORNEY TORPAATT Papen eae CIVIL CASE COVER SHEET ee Sere aa Rogen 2 28 Shower art on ventanacm-010 a saver oN HOWTO cowpteTe THE cover @ter ‘To Plaintifs and Others Filing First Papers. If you are fling a frst paper (for example, @ complaint) in a civil case, you must Complete and fie, alongwith your first paper, the Civil Case Cover Sheet contained on page 7. Ths infermatin wil be used fo compile Gatztes abou the types and eumbers of cases filed. You must complete iems 1 through 6 onthe sheet. In lem 1, you must check sine box forthe case type that best describes the case. Ifthe case fis both a general and a more specific ype of case sted in tem 1, heck the mote specific one. Ifthe case has multiple causes of action, check the box that best indicates the primary cause of action. So assist you in completing the sheet, examples ofthe cases tht belong under each case type in tem 1 ate provided below. A cover Sheet muct be fled only wih your nial paper. Failure to flea cover sheet wth the fst paper fled in a'cvl ease may subject a pary, is counsel, oF both fo sanctions under rules 2.30 and 3.220 ofthe California Rules of Court To Parties in Rule 3.740 Collections Cases. A “collections case" under rule 3.740 is defined as an action for recovery of money Jrecdin a sum stated to be certain that is not more than $25,000, exclusive of interest and attorney's fees, arising from a transaction in Sitch propery, senices, or money was acquited on credit, A collections case does not include an action seeking the folowing: (1) tor Jamages” (2) punve damages, 2) recovery of real propery, (4) recovery of personal propery, or (6) a prejudgment wnt of Fars e eventiicalon of a case as a rule 3.740 colections case on this form means that it wil be exempt from the general iimo-torsefvice requirements and case management cues, unless a defendant fies 2 responsive pleading. A rue 3.740 collections case wl be subject to the requirements for service and obtaining a judgment in rue 3.740. ‘To Parties in Complex Cases. In complex cases only, pares must aso use the Cuil Case Cover Sheet fo designate whether the cose is complex. Ifa plain believes the case is complex under rule 3.400 ofthe California Rules of Cour, this must be indicated by erpleting the appropiate towes in tems 1 and 2 Ifa pantif Gesignates a case 2s complex, the cover sheet must be served with tne cembtcit on all pares fo the action. A defendant may fle and serve no later than the time of its fst appearance a oinder inthe Giants designation, 2 counter-designaton thatthe case isnot comple, o,f the pint nas made no designation, a designation that ‘ ‘the case is complex. CASE TYPES AND EXAMPLES: Auto Tort Contract Provsionally Complex Chul Litigation (Cal “auto (22) Persona injuyropery ‘reach of ConaclWarany (8) Rules of Court Rules 1400-3403) ‘camage/Wrenghl Death Drache fa ae Rept (2) vowel ee Cans ten se Trt (40) Sunacbnaujectio CConiractWarranty Breach-Seller ‘Securities Ltigation (28) Srowaton. check Ins fom Plain not feus or negigence) Environmental Tox Trt (3) itaead of ate) iNeghgent Breacs of Convecl Insurance Coverage Claims ‘ther BUPOND (Personal Iniury! Waraty fang rm provisional complex my uttiehetcommaranaty cepa a) on olecon (eg. money we, open -foreement of Judgment aoe Caen Cove Seles Paint vee of Jaret ou mace ie Proparty Darga ecton Case-Sele aint tract of Judgrnent (Out Abetce Prony Dana Strano notes Ooi ee eecanan ce onfesson of 4udgmet (aon Product Liability (no! asbestos or Insurance Coverage (not provisionally domestic relations) ‘etounananenta) Gs compe (18) star Sate Jusgment Medial Malpracte (8) ‘lo Subrogation Aarintratve Agency Award aoe necpeseiae (ther Coverage (rot unpaid ares) Physicians & Surgeons ‘Other Contract (37) Petion/Certifcation of Entry of Other Professional Health Care: Contractual Fraud aoa fell ee Mead i Malpractice Other Contract Dispute Eee of coe er Real ro se Oi etmete Labi (e5, 9 rnen Conaiviverse iscelaneous Chl Complaint a fal). Conderaston (14) RICO zr) Intentional Bodily Injury/POAWD Wrongful Eviction (33) On (not specifiod (eg. sesaut, vandsm) (Other Real Property (e.g. quiet tite) (28) Decter Intentional inition of ‘wil of Possession of Real Property Ceca Sone ‘Emotional Distress Mortgage Foreclosure aun sg oon te as rational Distress: ‘Other Real Property (not eminent ee ‘ner PUPOIWO Soman enoroerart 3 (ter Conmensial Complain Non-PIIPOMND (Other) Tort foreciosure) ee 2usiness Tonia Business Uoiawrul Detainer Ch Colt Prats (07) Commercial (1) Miscellaneous Gv Pettion Cc igs (e9., dsciination, Resicntial (32) annersnp and Coote ‘ee area to Droge (8) te cas ives ileal Covemance 2 harassment rugs check this fom: cherie, ear at tec 8) Judicial Review Gui rarasement Fea 6) “Asset Fodor (05) Woroiaee vience intelectual Property (19) Peon te artravon Awe (11) EaerfOependent Aut [Professional Negligence (25) ‘Wilt of Mandate (02) “Abuse 25 Legal awacice ‘nit-nmnitalve Mandamus Bian SS Ober Protessonel Mabpactice WilcMangamus on Lnted Cout See o {20t madical or lege, Case Matter Patition for Relief From Late eoner ton RIPE Ta 8) Wat-Other Limited Cour Case ‘cam ployment Reve ‘ther Ci elton "tong Termination (36) one occas ot Other Employment (15) Review of Health Officer Order Notice at Appesl-Labor ‘Commissioner Appeals eee CIVIL CASE COVER SHEET a* ORIGINAL FAUTEUX, et al. v. NARCONON INTERNATIONAL, etal cxemaeB 6-392 OL CIVIL CASE COVER SHEET ADDENDUM AND STATEMENT OF LOCATION (CERTIFICATE OF GROUNDS FOR ASSIGNMENT TO COURTHOUSE LOCATION) This form is required pursuant to Local Rule 23 in all new civil case filings in the Los Angeles Superior Court. Step 1: After completing the Civil Case Cover Sheet (Judicial Council form CI-010), find the exact case type in Column A that corresponds to the case type indicated in the Civil Case Cover Sheet. ‘Step 2: in Column B, check the box for the type of action that best describes the nature of the case. ‘Step 3: In Column ¢, circle the number which explains the reason for the court filing location you have chosen, Applicable Reasons for Choosing Court Filing Location (Column C) 1. Class actons must be fled inthe Staney Mosk Courthouse, Cental Distr _7. Location where patton resis. 8. Location wherein defendantrespondent functions whol 8 Location here ane or mare othe pats reside 2, Permissive ling in contra itt 3. Lecation where cause of acon aos. 4. Wandatory personal ny ng in North 5. Location where perormance required cr 6 Location of property or permanently gar Distt 10, Location of Labor Commissioner Oe defendant resides 90d vehicle. 11. Mandatory filing location (Hub Cases — unlawful detainer limited rnon- ion) : Breach of Cansmeu WEA) | x5008 ContraciWaranty reach Seller Pitt (0 roudinegigence) ae {not insurence) D._A8019 Negligent Breach of ContractWarranty (no fraud) ae D_ A6028 Other Breach of ContractMWarranty (not fraud or negligence) a z 1 A002 Cotecions Case Seber it 561 £ cotactons 09) z © ABOY2 Other roms NotlCaecton Case sn ° D_A8034 Collections Case-Purchased Debt (Charged Of Consumer Debt 56,11 Purchased on oar Janay 1,204) Insurance Coverage (18) | AB015 Inwance Coverage (nc complx) 1.2.58 1 As0t8 Conracl rout 42.38 Over onrse (37) [Ast Toros iarerence 1.2.88 © AB02T Ober Conroe Osput(netbeachinsroncereudregigence) ——|1,2.3,8.9 Tripen bananas re pomannvas® 1 47300 Eninen DomainCendernaton Number of pace 28 z B | wonsttertoncany [1 asozs wend evetoncave 26 3 AOI Morgage Foreclosure 26 2 Other Real Property (26) | (1 A6032 Quiet Tite 26 16060 Other Rea Property (aterinen domain, andordtenantfreosue) | 2.6 l,_ [Priwereaneccommercal TS “se021 Unavid Deane Commercial (ot ds cr wongll even en Sg [Poatonagernestens [asa uniwitonanerResiere etn x worgleicon) |r 2g putt Delaines, |) A6020F Unlewkt Detainer Post Foresure 2.6.11 5 | Untowis DetainerOrgs(38) | A602 Union! Detainer eas 2.6.11 =_e_lf(xX=n LAcv 109 (Rov 276) CIVIL CASE COVER SHEET ADDENDUM Uocal Rule 23 ‘AND STATEMENT OF LOCATION Page 20f4 Lasc Approved 03-04SOnTNS FAUTEUX, eta. v. NARCONON INTERNATIONAL, et al ae LASC Approved 03-04 AND STATEMENT OF LOCATION Page 30f 4 ase Feoire(0s) | AS108 Asset Foveture Case = | Pettonsearaton 11) [DD ABtIS Petonic CampelCantmtacateAttraton 28 2 é 1D ABI! Wht- Administrative Mandamus 28 3 WetotMandate(02) | AGIE2 Wet-Mandaruson init Cut Cate Mater 2 3 {2 AS159 Wat - Oe nied Cout Cae Review 2 ter Judit Review 38) | C1 A680 Ober Wit usc! Review 28 ‘Ante redeRepulaton (3) | ABDIS AnstTradeRepuleion 128 Conanvcten Deter (0) | A8007 Cancion Detet 123 | Calsiwotmatess Tor | ga008 caine inebing Mass Tot 128 z S| securtestiigation 20) | 8025 Securities Ligation Ca 1.28 z Tose Tot 5 Ene Te yy [A038 Tox TerEnronmertal 12.98 8 | insurance Coverage Claims vion (complex case on a E | nmuancecovrnge cine | nants inaneeCoveagelSubrogatoncamplxcase on 2.5.8 1D Asta Sater Sie Judgren 251 ee 12 AGO Astact ugent 26 sie ee 0 A6107 Confession of Judgment (non-domestic relations) 29 is at suderent (20) | n6140 Adrinsatve Agency Award (nt unpaitais) 28 as 1D. ABtY4 Peton/Certiicat for Entry of Judgment on Unpaid Tax 28 1 AGH2 Other Enecement of Judgment Case 2.89 1c0 @7) ABO Rackeanng (RICO) Case 128 2 3 1D A600 Deck Rade Oty 128 & i Ctnerconplats | ABDAD Ijncve Reef On (nt cmestcarasmer) 28 BS | evoesosetea trove} | as011 ober Commercial Compl Case ronorvnoncanpie) 428 2% 1D_A8000 ter Chi Complaint (non-emnon-complex) 1.28 ParpermneCorpgnton ] a6113 Parnersip and Corporate Goverance Case 2.8 A612 Cai Harasement 239 ' 6123 Worplce Harassment 23a : conerPenona x | ASE Elegant Aut abuse Case 2.38 | Speated Above) 43) | ABTOO Elecion Contest 2 | 1D ABHO Potion Change o NamelChange of Gender = | © AO170 Pettontor Relea Late Csi Law Brin © A8I00 Ciera Peston AG | i ae 09 Rev 2n6) CIVIL CASE COVER SHEET ADDENDUM Uocal Rule 23 i i |SORE CSE FAUTEUX, et al. v. NARCONON INTERNATIONAL, et al. Step 4: Statement of Reason and Address: Check the appropriate boxes forthe numbers shown under Column C for the type of action that you have selected. Enter the address which isthe basis forthe filing location, including zip code. {No address required for class action cases). REASON: 17065 Hollywood Boulevard 01.02.03.04.05.96.07. 08.0 9.010.811 ore ware [arcoee Los Angeles Ica 90028 Step 5: Certification of Assignment: | certify that this case is properly filed in the Central District of Dated; November the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles [Code Civ. Proc., §392 et seq,, and Local Rule 2.3(a)(1 EN 2016 PLEASE HAVE THE FOLLOWING ITEMS COMPLETED AND READY TO BE FILED IN ORDER TO PROPERLY COMMENCE YOUR NEW COURT CASE: a 1 2 3 4 Original Complaint or Petition, Ir fiing 3 Complaint, a completed Summons form for issuance by the Clerk. Givil Case Cover Sheet, Judicial Counc! form CM-010. Civil Case Cover Sheet Addendum and Statement of Location form, LACIV 109, LASC Approved 03-04 (Rev. 02/16), Payment in full of the fling fee, unless there is court order for waiver, patil or scheduled payments, AA signed order appointing the Guardian ad Litem, Judicial Council form CIV-010, if the plaintiff or petitioner is a ‘minor under 18 years of age will be required by Court in order to issue a summons, ‘Additional copies of documents to be conformed by the Clerk. Copies of the cover sheet and this addendum ‘must be served along with the summons and complaint, or other initiating pleading in the case. LAGIV 109 Rev 2/16) CIVIL CASE COVER SHEET ADDENDUM Local Rule 23 LASC Approved 03-04 AND STATEMENT OF LOCATION Poge 4 of 4