Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Cortney Bench
Writing 1010
Professor Crow
December 5, 2016
Annotated Bibliography
Asma, Stephen T. Monsters and the Moral Imagination. The Chronicle of Higher
that monsters represent human vulnerability and crisis which is crucial part of
monsterology that plays an imaginative role in human's lives, while also making them
think about the responses to specific situations. In order to illustrate his claim, the author
uses a number of examples and historical events to make connections to his audience. He
mentions well known movies like Zombieland, Where the Wild Things Are, Saw IV,
Halloween II, The Wolfman, and Twilight Saga: New Moon so his audience can
understand what he is arguing about. The historical events he discusses are the tragic
events like 9/11 and the conflict in Iraq in order to connect specifically to Americans.
Asma introduces to his audience is Silvas killing spree. Silvia killed these people
because he thought his mother was dead. All of these examples, help Asma connect to his
Reading many of the recent examples that Asma has incorporated in his argument
helped me understand his claim because the examples are relatable to most people,
Bench 2
including myself. Asma uses formal language and incorporates more sophisticated
is re-enchanted with meaningful monsters, and even the eggheads are stroking their
chins-last month saw the seventh global conference on Monsters and the Monstrous at the
University of Oxford. (1) In order to understand this sentence, someone would have
some sort of knowledge of the context behind this especially the word egghead. The
term egghead is a more academic term for being intelligent. Throughout the article,
Asma uses more academic terms and vocabulary to connect to his audience to the ones
who will understand them the most. Asma starts broadley using pop culture than he starts
to focus on the eggheads. Another way Asma makes a connection between his audience
is by context and culture. He does this by mentioning the 9/11 incident and the attack in
Iraq. He uses these horrifying events to give his audience specific examples to understand
Kaplan, Matt. The Science of Monsters. ABC Science, ABC, 8 July 2013,
2016.
question to his audience which is Why have monster stories, which have the effect of
scaring people, persisted so relentlessly throughout the ages?(1). While he poses this
question to his audience to illustrate his answer, he provides many sub-claims that
answers the question that he proposed. Kaplan uses the examples of the experiment of
spicy food, variation of behaviors for animal, the sense of mastery of the mind over the
Bench 3
body, humans are predisposed to flee from danger but also be risk takers in certain
surrounding world. The main point of his argument is that monsters are presented in our
After reading Kaplans main points and argument, I believe his ideas relate most
to Stephen Asmas ideas in Monsters and Moral Imagination. Kaplan and Asma both
have different explanations and examples, but the ideas behind their argument are very
similar. Kaplan uses logos frequently throughout his writing, for example, Kaplan says
Seeing them makes the heart pump faster, hairs stand on end, and sweat pour down our
face.(1). This quote shows that he uses logos because of the logical progression of our
Kaplan also connects with his audience by using culture in his writing. He
incorporates certain stories that consist both of academic and popular stories in order to
educate his audience. He includes specific stories so that it also relates to his main
argument. Kaplans tone and persuasive examples in the first paragraph helps lure his
audience so they keep reading on, and hopefully sell more of his book.
https://www.netflix.com/watch/70223021?trackId=14170289&tctx=0%2C5%2C4ac635
B6-8c20-489a-bb7c-68ae318c540b-39043625.
The show, Supernatural, there are these two characters, Dean and Sam, who are
brothers and monster hunters. They go out to search and kill any monsters they can find.
In the episode,Skin, Sam gets a text from his old college friend Becky that says her
Bench 4
brother Zach was convicted of murdering his girlfriend. Both brothers decide to go back
and help out Sams friend. They meet up with Becky and talk about the details of what
happened. After finding out what happened, Dean and Sam are both willing to help and
they head over to the house where the murder took place. They find some interesting
clues that will help to find who actually committed the murder. Meanwhile, another
murder happens just like the same murder of Zachs girlfriend. The clues they discover
leads them down to the sewer, where the brothers find blood and a pile of skin. Sam and
Dean finally find the man who is committing all of the murders, and that not a human but
a shapeshifter. At some point, the shapeshifter transformed into Dean and kidnaps Sam.
Sam then figures out that Dean was also kidnapped by the shapeshifter. Both brothers
find a way out of the sewer, and go find the shapeshifter who is at Beckys house. They
get to the house and fight the shapeshifter, and eventually they are able to kill it.
that allows the audience to connect. During the episode, the lighting during most of the
movie is dark, and the reason for this is to make it look even more scarier and more
suspicious to the audience. If it was light, the audience would think everything was okay,
which does not fit with the general ambiance of the episode. Towards the end of the
show when Jared and Sam kill the monster and save the day, the lighting gets brighter
and it is no longer dark. This shows that now the main threat of the episode is gone which
makes the audience feel a sense of relief. Another rhetorical choice is the music that is
used in the episode. In the beginning, they use hard rock and roll music because it use to
be considered scary music that sets the scene of the episode. If happy music was played
Bench 5
in the beginning, it would make the audience feel a different emotion than the makers of
http://wilwheaton.typepad.com/wwdnbackup/2011/10/flash-fiction-the-monster-in-my-c
The story My Monster in my Closet is about a little girl who has a monster in
his closet. The little girl runs to her parents and tells them that there is a monster in her
closet. The father of the girl asks her questions about the monster, but then he starts to
make fun of the girl for being scared. The mom becomes angry at the dad and tells him
not make fun their daughter for her imagination. She tells the girl that she can have the
nightlight on and they walk her back to her room. The girl gets in bed and hears the
monster talking to her through the closet door again. She screams and her parents come
into the room. His dad is sick of his daughters overreaction and goes to open the door.
When the dad opens the closet door, the monster is indeed there and kills the dad. The
mom walks over to the monster and she tells him that she has missed him. Her skin then
starts to crack and underneath are dark scales. She told her daughter to come over and
meet her real dad. The girl freaks out and her skin starts to peel to reveal dark scales. The
girl looks at her dads dead body and begins to eat the rest of the body with her monster
family.
When I read My Monster in my Closet, the tone of the author in the story made
the story even more scary. The writer used specific language that impacted the story,
which made it even more scary. For example, the writer uses italics during the time when
Bench 6
the monster was talking which made the the monster sound creepy, and it highlighted
how different the monster was from the other people in the story. By italicizing when the
monster was talking, we can tell the monster spoke different than the humans because we
know he must talk creepy of the text is different than when the humans talked. Wheatons
tone and voice made the story even more scarier and this kept the story interesting. While
the story was short, it was also intense and it made the story that much better.