Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Situaciones de urgencias
relacionadas con implantes
Jorge Enrique Llano Rodrguez, Olga Marcela Malagn Baquero, Juan Manuel Arango Gaviria
dacin del tejido y podra interferir con la oseo- da el uso de antimicrobianos o de geles orales
integracin, los intentos para cubrir las porciones que protegen el rea descubierta y favorecen la
expuestas resultan infructuosos, debe mantener- reparacin mientras puede retirarse la mem-
se la zona limpia y libre de placa. Se recomien- brana.
exposicin posquirrgica
Es la comunicacin prematura entre el implante o membrana y la cavidad oral.
Hay perforacin del tejido blando que cubre el implante, con una zona eritematosa alrededor de la zona expuesta y pre-
sencia de residuos, fibrina y placa bacteriana sobre la superficie.
La zona expuesta debe mantenerse limpia y libre de placa, se recomienda el uso de antimicrobianos.
La exposicin de la rosca del cuerpo del implante favorece la colonizacin bacteriana y puede afectar la cicatrizacin, los
tornillos de cierre primario, al exponerse, no interfieren con la oseointegracin.
Si es una membrana, se recomienda utilizar algn enjuagatorio que contenga antimicrobianos o cubrir con geles orales
mientras se retira
Autoevaluacin
Cmo puede afectar al implante la exposicin prema- Cmo puede manejarse la exposicin de una membra-
Qu medicamentos se pueden usar con precaucin en la atencin odontolgica de la paciente embarazada:
tura? na para regeneracin sea?
________________________________________ ________________________________________
________________________________________ ________________________________________
________________________________________
Qu desventaja ve en el tratamiento de superficie de ________________________________________
los implantes? ________________________________________
________________________________________
________________________________________
Autoevaluacin
Qu se debe considerar para calificar un implante Cmo se maneja un implante no oseointegrado?
Qu medicamentos se pueden usar con precaucin en la atencin odontolgica de la paciente embarazada:
como exitoso? ________________________________________
________________________________________ ________________________________________
________________________________________ ________________________________________
________________________________________
Qu significado puede tener la movilidad de un im- ________________________________________
plante?
________________________________________
________________________________________
________________________________________
Autoevaluacin
Qu es la profilaxis antibitica? Cmo se detecta presencia de infeccin posquirrgica
Qu medicamentos se pueden usar con precaucin en la atencin odontolgica de la paciente embarazada:
________________________________________ de implantes?
________________________________________ ________________________________________
________________________________________
Por qu puede ocurrir una infeccin posquirrgica de ________________________________________
implantes? ________________________________________
________________________________________
________________________________________
________________________________________
Autoevaluacin
Qu se busca con la radiografa en el diagnstico y Por qu es tan importante cubrir la entrada del im-
Qu medicamentos se pueden usar con precaucin en la atencin odontolgica de la paciente embarazada:
tratamiento de urgencia? plante?
________________________________________ ________________________________________
________________________________________ ________________________________________
________________________________________ ________________________________________
Autoevaluacin
Qu cuidados se deben tener cuando se retira un frag- Qu conducta se sigue cuando hay movilidad de un
Qu medicamentos se pueden usar con precaucin en la atencin odontolgica de la paciente embarazada:
mento de tornillo fracturado dentro del implante? implante que soporta una prtesis?
________________________________________ ________________________________________
________________________________________ ________________________________________
Cul es el procedimiento para recementar una corona Qu consecuencias puede traer la fractura de la su-
o prtesis sobre implantes que se ha descementado? praestructura?
________________________________________ ________________________________________
________________________________________ ________________________________________
Bibliografa
Advances in dentistry. Implants.J Am Dent Assoc. Barzilay I, Graser GN, Iranpour B, Natiella JR. Imme-
1986 Dic;113(6):872-9. diate implantation of a pure titanium implant into an
Albrektsson T. Direct bone anchorage of dental im- extraction socket: report of a pilot procedure. Int J
plants. J Prosthet Dent. 1983;50(2):255-61. Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1991;6(3):277-84.
Babbush C, Kirsh A, Ackerman K, Mentag P. The intra- Bauman GR, Mills M, Rapley JW, Hallmon WH. Cli-
mobile cylinder (IMZ), two stage osteointegrated nical parameters of evaluation during implant
implant system with the intramobile element (IME): maintenance. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants.
short and long-term cinical data. The Implant Re- 1992;7(2):220-27.
port Practical Periodontics & Aesthetic Dentistry. Becker W, Becker BE, Israelson H, et al. One step sur-
1990;2:24-32. gical placement of Branemark Implants: A prospec-
Urgencias Odontolgicas 4 edicin. Malagn / Londoo. 2013. Editorial Mdica Panamericana.
CAPTULO 15 Situaciones de urgencias relacionadas con implantes 237
tive multicenter clinical study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Esposito M, Grusovin MG, Talati M, et al. Interven-
Implants. 1997;12(4):454-62. tions for replacing missing teeth: antibiotics at
Beime OR, Worthington P. Problems and complications dental implant placement to prevent complica-
in implant surgery. Oral and maxillofacial surgery. tions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Jul
Clinics Dent North America. Filadelfia: W.B. Saun- 16;(3):CD004152. Actualizado en: Cochrane
ders; 1991. Database Syst Rev. 2010;(7):CD004152.
Brnemark PI. Osseointegration and its experimental Friberg B, Jemt T y Lekholm U. Early failures in 4641
background. J Prosthet Dent. 1983;50(3):399-410. consecutively placed Branemark dental implants:
Brnemark PI, Zarb G, Albrektsson T. Tissue-Intearated A study from stage I surgery to the connection of
prostheses. Osseointegration in clinical dentistry. completed prostheses. Int Oral Maxillofac Impl.
Chicago: Quintessence publishing; 1985. l991;6(2):142-6.
Brnemark PI, Engstrand P, Ohrnell LO, et al. Brane- Gammage DD, Bowman AE, Meffert RM, et al. Histo-
mark Novum: A New Treatment Concept for Reha- logic and scanning electron micrographic compa-
bilitation of the Edentulous Mandible. Preliminary rison of the osseous interface in loaded IMZ and
results from a prospective clinical follow-up study. integral implants. Int J Periodontics Restorative
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 1999;1(1):2-16. Dent. 1990;10(2):124-35.
Bowman AE, Gammage DD, Meffert RM, et al. Com- Gracis SE, Nicholls JI, Chalupnik JD y Yuodelis RA.
parison of the soft and osseous tissues responses Shock absorbing behavior of five restorative
of loaded and unloaded IMZ implants. Int J Perio- materials used on implants. Int J Prosthodont.
dontics Restorative Dent. 1990;10(4):300-11. 1991;4(3):282-91.
Budd TW, Bielat KL, Meenaghan MA, Schaaf NG. Mi- Guichet DL, Caputo AA, Choi H y Soerensen JA. Pas-
croscopic observations of the bone/implant inter- sivity of Fit and Marginal Opening in Screw or
face of surface treated titanium implants. Int J Oral Cement-Retained Implant. Int J Oral Maxillofac
Maxillofac Implants 1991;6(3):253-8. Implants. 2000;15(2):239-46.
Budd TW, Nagahara K, Bielat KL, et al. Visualization Hobkirk JA, Schawb J. Mandibular deformation in
and initial characterization of the bone implant subjects with osseointegrated implants. Int J Oral
interface of osseointegrated implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1991;6(3):319-28.
Maxillofac Implants. 1992;7(2):151-60. Jemt T, Lindn B, Lekholm U. Failures and complica-
Buser D, Bragger U, Lang NP, Nyman S. Regeneration tions in 127 consecutively placed fixed parcial
and enlargement of jaw bone using guided tissue prostheses supported by Branemark implants: from
regeneration. Clin Oral Impl Res 1990;1:22-32. prosthetic treatment to first annual check-up. Int J
Chapman RJ, Kirsch A. Variations in occlusal forces Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1992;7(1):40-4.
with a resilient internal implant shock absorber. Int Jemt T, Lindn B, Urde G. Failures and complications
J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1990;5(4):369-74. in 92 consecutively inserted overdentures suppor-
Cranin AN, Gelbman J, Dibling J. Evolution of dental ted by Branemark implants in severely resorbed
Implants in the twentieth century. Alpha Omega. maxillae: A study from prosthetic treatment first
1987;80:24-31. annual check-up Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants.
Dahlin C, Sennerby L, Lekholm U, et al. Generation of 1992;7(2):162-7.
new bone around titanium implants using a mem- Jimnez M. Atlas de enfermedades orales en nios,
brane technique: an experimental study in rabbits. adolecentes y adultos jvenes. Medelln: Univer-
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1989;4(1):19-25. sidad de Antioquia; Asociacin Colombiana de
Dahlin C, Lekholm U, Linde A. Membrane - induced Periodoncia y Oseointegracin; 2011.
bone augmentation at titanium implants. A Re- Jimnez M, Duque F, Baer PN, Jimnez SB. Ne
port of Ten Fixtures Followed From 1 to 3 Years crotizing ulcerative periodontal diseases in
After Loading. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. children and Young adults in Medellin, Co-
1991;11(4):273-81.Emphasis. lombia 1965-2000. J Int Acad Periodontol.
English CE. Implants. Part I. Cylindrical implants. CDA 2005;7:55-63.
J. 1988;16(1):17-26. Jemt T. Failures and complications in 391 consecutively
English CE. Cylindrical Implants: Part II. CDA J. inserted fixed prostheses supported by Branemark
1988;16(1):26-37. implants in edentulous jaws: A study of treatment
English CE. Implant Symposium. CDA J. 1987;15-25. from the time of prostheses placement to the first
Engquist B, Astrand P, Anzn B, et al. Simplified me- annual check-up. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants.
thods of implant treatment in the edentulous lower 1991;6(3):2706.
jaw, a controled prospective study Part I: One- Kasemo B. Biocompatibility of titanium implants: Sur-
stage versus two stage surgery. Clin Implant Dent face sciences aspects. J Prosth Dent. 1983;49(6):
Relat Res. 2002;4(2):93-103. 832-7.
Ericson J (Invited Speakers). New insigths on one vs.two Kirsch A, Ackerman K. The IMZ osseointegrated implant
stage procedures. Clin Oral Impl Res. 2002;13:v. system. Dent Clin North Am. 1989;33(4):733-91.
Kirsch A, Ackermann KL. A thirteen-year retrospective Rosenquist B. Fixture placement posterior of the men-
analysis of the IMZ implant system. Irvin: Interpore tal foramen with transpositioning of the inferior
international reports; 1992. alveolar nerve. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants.
Kirsch A. IMZ-Over a decade of clinica use. Interpore 1992;7(1):45-50.
Update. 1992;5:1. Saadoun A. Delayed Submerged Implant versus Inme-
Klauber C, Lenz L, Henry P. Oxide thickness and sur- diate Nonsubmerged Implant. Clin Oral Impl Res.
face contamination of six endosseous dental im- 2002;13:xxxi.
plants determined by electron spectroscopy for Sager D, Thies R. Implant retained precision two-
chemical analysis: A preliminary report. Int J Oral stage single tooth replacement. J Oral Implantol.
Maxillofac Implants. 1990;5(3):264-71. 1991;17(2):166-71.
Kraut R, Dootson J, Mc Cullen A. Biomechanical analy- Shepherd N. Why use an intramobile element? Inter-
sis of osseointegration of IMZ implants in goat pore Update. 1992;5:2-3.
mandibles and maxillae. Int J Oral Maxillofac Im- Skalak R. Biomechanical considerations in oseeointe-
plants. 1991;6(2):187-94. grated prostheses. J Prosth Dent. 1983;49(6):843-
Lindhe, J. Karring T, Lang NP. Periodontologa clni- 48.
ca e implantologa odontolgica. 4.a ed. Buenos Smith D, Zarb G. Criteria for success of osseoin-
Aires: Mdica panamericana; 2005. tegrated endosseus implants. J Prosthet Dent.
Lpez Arranz JS, de Vicente Rodriguez JC, et al. 1989;62(5):567-72.
Osseointegration of IMZ implants. Ultrastructu- Sones AD. Complications with osseointegrated im-
ral analysis of a case. Rev Eur Odontoestomatol plants. J Prosth Dent. 1989;62(5):580-584.
1990;2(5):319-324. Sonoyama W, Kuboki T, Okamoto S, et al. Quality
Malevez C (Invited Speakers). Zigomatic Implants. of Life Assestment in Patients with Implant-suppor-
Clin Oral Impl Res. 2002;13:vi. ted and Resin-Bonded Fixed Prosthesis for Boun-
Manzour Ahmed y col. Comparative Evaluation ofCas- ded Edentulous Spaces. Clin Oral Implants Res.
ting Retention Using iti Solid Abutment with Six Ce- 2002;13(4):359-364.
ments. Clin Oral Impl Res. 2002;13:343-348. Sullivan D. Prosthetic considerations for the utilization os-
McCartney J, Kuhar K. The intemal threaded chamber of seointegrated fixtures in the partially edentulous arch
O.I. implants. J Prosthet Dent. 1990;63(4): 488-9. Int. J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1987;1(1):39-45
McCartney J, Kuhar K. Retrieving fractured intramo- Testori T, Del Fabbro M y col. (Poster presentation). In-
vile elements from O.I. implants. J Prosthet Dent. mediate Loaded Osseotite Implants in the Partially
1990;63(2):245. Edentulous Patient. Report on a 18-Month Expe-
McGlumphy EA, Robinson DM, Mendel DA. Im- rience. Clin Oral Impl Res. 2002;13:xxv.
plant superstructures: A comparison of ultima- Triplett RG, Mason ME, Alfonso WF, McAnear JT.
te failure force. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. Endosseous cylinder implants in severly atro-
1992;7(1):35-9. phic mandibles. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants.
Misch C. Implantologa contempornea, 3.a ed. Bar- 1991;6(3):264-9.
celona: Elsevier; 2009. Wachtel HC, Langford A, Bernimoulin JP, Reichart P.
Nuovodent. Especial 500 aos odontologa en Amrica Guided bone regeneration next to osseointegrated
pre-colom bina: Bogot: Diagnhos; 1992. VI-III. implants in humans. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants.
Parell S, Branemark PI, Ohrnell Lars-Olog, Svens- 1991;6(2):127-35.
son B. Remote Implant Anchorage for the Reha- Watanabe F, Tawada Y, Komatsu S, Hata Y. Heat Dis-
bilitation of Maxillary Defects. J Ptosthet Dent. tribution in bone during preparation of implant
2001;86(4):377-81. sites: Heat analysis by real time. Int J Oral Maxillo-
Patterson E, Johns RB. Theoretical analysis of the fatigue fac Implants. 1992;7(2):212-19.
life on fixtures screws in osseointegrated implants. Worthington P, Branemark PI. Advances osseointegration
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1992;7(1):26-34. surgery. Applications in the maxillofacial region.
Pylant T, Triplett RG, Key MC, Brunsvold MA. A retros- Carol Stream (IL): Quintessence Publishing; 1992.
pective evaluation of endosseous implants in the Zabalegui J, Gil J, Zabalegui B. Magnetic resonance
partially edentulous patient. Int J Oral Maxillofac imaging as and adjunctive diagnostic aid in pa-
Implants. 1992;7(2):195. tient selection for endosseous implants: Preliminary
Rompen E (Invited Speakers). Improvements in the Bra- study. Int J Maxillofac Implants 1990;5(3):283-7.
nemark/Replace select system. Clin Oral Impl Res. Zarb G. The Promise of Osseointegration Two Decades
2002;13:iii. Later. Clin Impl Dent and Rel Res. 2002;4(2):57-9.