Le 1

Sallie Le

Professor Miss

UWRT 1104

February 7, 2017

Rhetorical Analysis of My Academic Discourse Paper

I was asked by my professor to attend a Charlotte Film Festival and watch a movie for

the experience. After watching the film, I needed to write about my experience. The experience

could be anything about the movie itself, the environment or atmosphere while watching the film

to the reaction of everyone surrounding me. Since the paper is completely an experience paper,

the tone is very informative and the writing was informal. The informality is directed to an

audience who wants to be informed on about a night watching an infamous film.

This assignment was an experience paper so I believed that this needed to be a paper

written in first person: I walked in the room with the movie already a few minutes in and the

first thought I had was realizing that I will be reading subtitles for 90 minutes(Le 1). The

narration in first person would clarify that this was in my thoughts, feelings, and opinions of the

experience I had at the film festival which could be completely different from another persons

experience. I think that determining the narration is a huge factor in a paper. There is a stronger

connection between the writer and the audience when it is written in first person whether it is a

positive or negative connection. The audience will be able to get the first hand emotion as if they

were inside the writers head. In this case, the audience will be able to feel the emotions and the

connection I had with the film as I am explaining in detail to what I see and feel. The first

person narration will also help the audience build a personality of the writer through the writers
 Le 2

personal style of diction and sentence structure: Everyone around me was like that too, their

body blocks what the mind actually wants (Le 2). I think that this sentence from the essay

exemplifies that the writer is a bit humorous and light-hearted because I have not heard anyone

say that phrase before.

The paper was mostly written in chronological order, as it starts out with the first

impression of the movie and ends with the reflection on the movie. I think this gives the audience

a build-up of the whole experience and it will allow them to understand the experience better as

if they were there alongside me. The chronological order also helped with a neat arrangement to

have a fluid structure of communication.

This experience expressed with words on paper became really personal to me because of

the connections made throughout the analysis. The connections I made are unique to me as not

everyone shared my specific interest that I related the movie to. For example, I compared works

under infamous YouTube directors to a film I had never been introduced to that is directed by an

infamous foreign director. I also mentioned the familiarity of reading English subtitles as it

something I had already experienced outside of the Charlotte Film Festival. The idea that there

are connections beyond the experience in the movie theater, will make the experience personally

mine. These kind of connections are also for more clarity of my experience. The connections will

allow the audience to better understand the events I went through.

The influence in my writing in this academic paper is noticeably from past experiences. I

wrote about my likes and dislikes of the movie based on what I already liked and disliked. When

a certain part of the movie reminds me of my interests, I gain a personal emotional connection. It

is shown through the word choice I used when I relate the connections. If I were to like dogs, I

would probably write something like this, the dog I fatefully met the other day, lovingly licked
 Le 3

my face showing its affection to if I were to hate dogs: the dog I bumped into the other day,

disgustingly spread all of its germs onto my face. When I compared the movie to works made

by one of my favorite directors, the word choice were bright and positive and the readers will be

able to tell my feelings through the word choice: I enjoy watching the short series and I think

the quality of the film is notablewith a few flaws (Le 3). This is also helped by the

narration in first person as I makes it more personal.

I think a very intriguing portion about this paper, is the massive amount of heavy and

negative adjectives about the bloody theme in the movie. I used words that naturally would make

the readers emphasize the heavy words without realizing that they are doing it: their dangerous

and life-threatening actions are very thriller-like (Le 2) and it showed bloody guts spilling and

blood splattering (Le 3). The words, life-threatening and bloody guts are detailed and are

not light-hearted words so it really intrigues the reader to be imaginative. The adjectives used

were strong as it makes the audience curious as to what makes me shut my eyes or wince. Not

only does the pattern of adjectives throughout the essay makes the audience curious about the

movie, but also allows the audience to use their imagination and picture the scenes in their head

using the explanations I have given. The gruesome and bloody scenes in the movie gave a heavy

impact on my reflection of the experience as it stuck out the most to me. The audience will be

able to realize that graphic scenes made an impact on my first film festival screening event.

The sentences made up in my essay, were relatively short and the word choice was not

difficult. I think it still gets the point across to the reader as really complex sentences may get the

audience bored and distracted in the middle of the sentence. I think that the sentence length is

perfect for this type of experience paper, too. When experiencing anything, the thoughts are

fragmented and broken as there is not a time to think complex ideas at the moment. The thoughts
 Le 4

are short and new thoughts replace the older ones. There is a correlation between brief and

complex thoughts to the length of the sentences.

I think that my writing is very lacking in structure and grammar, but I do think

that the ideas and concepts that I wrote about in this academic paper are able to get to the reader.

The audience will be able to understand the feelings and opinions I have expressed in the paper

as I have related them to general things that people may have experienced outside of the event.

The grammatical errors may hinder the fluid of the paper, but that may also because I grew up

speaking with errors that I never learned how to fix. The way I speak is interconnected to the

way I write and this paper is no exception to that.

 Le 5

Works Cited

Le, Sallie. Karate Kill Essay for a Liberal Studies class. Arts & Society: Theatre. University of

North Carolina- Charlotte. n.d. Print.