Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
FACTS:
Jeannette Zamudio, the Regional Cashier, for dishonesty due to questionable gas expenses under
his office. It was alleged that he was falsifying gas receipts for reimbursements and that he had
an unliquidated cash advance worth P116,000.00. Zamudio also complained that she was
unjustly removed by Lumiqued two weeks after she filed the two complaints. The issue was
referred to the DOJ. Committee hearings on the complaints were conducted on July 3 and 10,
1992, but Lumiqued was not assisted by counsel. On the second hearing date, he moved for its
resetting to July 17, 1992, to enable him to employ the services of counsel. The committee
granted the motion, but neither Lumiqued nor his counsel appeared on the date he himself had
chosen, so the committee deemed the case submitted for resolution. The Investigating Committee
recommended the dismissal of Lumiqued. DOJ Sec Drilon adopted the recommendation. Fidel
ISSUE:
Whether or not the due process clause encompass the right to be assisted by counsel
HELD:
No. The right to counsel, which cannot be waived unless the waiver is in writing and in
the presence of counsel, is a right afforded a suspect or an accused during custodial investigation.
It is not an absolute right and may, thus, be invoked or rejected in a criminal proceeding and,
with more reason, in an administrative inquiry. In the case at bar, Lumiqued invoked the right of
an accused in criminal proceedings to have competent and independent counsel of his own
choice. Lumiqued, however, was not accused of any crime. The investigation conducted by the
committee was for the purpose of determining if he could be held administratively liable under
the law for the complaints filed against him. The right to counsel is not indispensable to due