Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Noah Arabbo, Catherine Butler, Aaron Espere, Cameron Shadaia, Veronica Tchernychouk
26 April 2017
The future appears bright for the city of Detroit, as its crime rates are continuously
decreasing. According to the United States Attorneys Office, Detroit is close to having the
lowest homicide rate in the city since 1967 (McQuade 1). In recent years, there has been up to a
28 percent decrease in the homicide rate, while other crimes have also gone down significantly:
percent (McQuade 3). With current Mayor Mike Duggan being known as a problem-solver and
dealing with the public safety operations of Detroit, the future seems positive for the city.
However, while these statistics are very important and encouraging to the future of Detroit, the
city still has a long way to go. When looking at Detroits crime rates in comparison to other
places in the United States, they are higher than average. In 2016 alone, there have been 302
homicides in Detroit: one of the highest murder rates in the country (Williams and Dickson,
par. 5). The violent crime rates and motor vehicle theft rates for Detroit are some of the highest
in the nation (Neighborhoodscout). Violent crimes can include armed robberies, aggravated
assaults, rapes, murders, and manslaughters. A lot of the crimes committed in Detroit consist of
property crimes, such as burglary, larceny, arson, and motor vehicle theft (Neighborhoodscout).
The danger of Detroit keeps a lot of people away, including new businesses. As stated by Kym
Worthy, You can have all the urban development you want and attract all the business people
you want, but if the citys not safe, they arent going to come [] and if they come, they arent
2
going to stay (Newcombe). Detroits reputation of being one of the most dangerous cities in the
United States dissuades people and businesses from relocating into the city. With the lack of
people coming to Detroit, the economy cannot be fueled on their transactions and consumption.
As found by a Harvard researcher, violent crime and criminal presence reduces economic
diversification, limiting the number of sectors that operate in a territory, favoring concentration,
and inhibiting the development of complex industries (Rios 4). Thus, in decreasing the crime
rates in Detroit, the economy and businesses will benefit. Finding solutions to the crime in
Detroit is important because not only do people want to feel safe in their own city, but people
The crime in Detroit is only an issue for those living in Detroit. When the auto-industry
and the stock market crashed, many people who could afford to fled from the city. This white
flight caused many of the houses in Detroit to become abandoned and taken over by blight. With
most the wealthy population gone, the city lost its economic stability, resulting in many
opportunities for crime to take over (Boyle 110-11). Due to the auto-industry being centered in
Detroit, the after-effects were mainly in the city. According to the FBIs Crime Reporting
System, the violent crime rates in just Detroit for the past two decades are four times the rates of
the entire state of Michigan. From that statistic, it is evident that crime is strictly a local problem
to Detroit.
the crime and poverty, Detroit is a less than desirable place to start a business. On a smaller,
individual level, heavy crime in an area can create the fear of crime. Today, the fear of crime is a
major social problem (Alper and Chappell 1). According to Mariel Alper and Allison Chappell,
[Having a fear of crime] undermines the quality of life, increases divisions between the rich and
3
the poor, transforms public places into places to avoid, leads to increased punitiveness, and can
increase crime (1). The fear of crime ruins the sense of community in an area. Wealthy people
may be able to protect themselves by moving from the area, but that only displaces crime onto
people already suffering. People living in areas heavy with crime feel helpless and will change
their daily habits. They will avoid leaving their homes, and when they do go out, they will avoid
certain dangerous activities, such as public transport, walking down certain roads, and being near
Many things can influence criminal activity, but there are no concrete causes of crime.
Detroits homicide rates and poverty levels have been studied to try and discover a correlation
between the two. It has been found that homicides, along with other acts of crime, are heavily
influenced by poverty, age, and the racial composition of a population, and as poverty increases
in an area, so do the amount of homicides (McDowall 27-30). Researchers find that most
homicide offenders and victims are young and non-white (McDowall 28). In the past three
decades, 54.7 percent of homicide offenders were non-white, and blacks were
disproportionately likely to commit homicide and to be the victims (Worrall, par. 11). Despite
race and age, background and situational factors can influence criminal activity. Background
factors can include: one having a low self-control, lack of parental or guardian supervision, or
association with delinquent peers (Agnew 1). Situational factors are circumstances in which
there could be a lack of supervision, the presence of attractive targets, or provocations by others
that could create the convenient opportunity to commit a crime (Agnew 1).
In the service learning aspect of the project, our group decided to tackle crime rates by
targeting blight. Blight can be described as the neglect of an urban area, and it can eventually
lead to other problems such as abandonment and deterioration. Blight is a very large problem in
4
Detroit: since 2005, [] 139,699 of 384,672 [of Detroit properties] have been foreclosed and
many of the foreclosed properties in Detroit are not maintained afterwards, thus, suffering from
blight (Kurth and MacDonald, par 2). These create environments that are promoters of crime.
Areas suffering from blight are usually not well maintained or visually appealing. They are areas
that emanate danger, and because of this, people tend to stay away from blight afflicted areas.
These factors can snowball into serious crime, as even minor public incivilities as drinking in
the street, spray-painting graffiti, and breaking windows can escalate into predatory crime
because prospective offenders assume from these manifestations of disorder that area residents
are indifferent to what happens in their neighborhoods (Sampson 1). Crime offenders assume
they are less likely to get caught committing crimes in blight afflicted neighborhoods due to the
condition, making it seem like people do not care about the area. This has led to frequent break-
To combat this blight, our group worked with the community in various cleanups in
different neighborhoods. We first volunteered at the Community of Scholars (CoS) Park Clean-
up with Wolverine Human Services, a group that aims to make safe environments for children to
be raised in. We helped a Wolverine Human Services community center and the surrounding
neighborhood by picking up trash. The second organization we volunteered with was the Urban
Development Program, which aims to help bring people back to Detroit through the
Helping assist in combating blight through volunteering really helped us realize how
much of a contributing factor blight is to crime. During the CoS park clean up, someone found a
gun while cleaning. We did not know if it was functioning or loaded, but to think it was right on
5
the ground, for anyone to find and potentially use it is no wonder blight afflicted areas suffer
from high rates of crime. Cleaning up blight should be the next step to reducing crime rates, and
all spheres can get involved. For example, the government sphere has enacted policies to combat
blight, like the Detroit Blight Force, and the market sphere can use their assets to help pay for
people to help clean up communities. The civic and private spheres can also organize cleanups
for their personal communities. Blight is a problem that does not have to be worked on on a large
scale: communities can help solve crime through volunteering. We can promote community
A program that has been successful in helping reduce crime rates in Detroit is the
AmeriCorps Urban Safety Program (ACUSP, par 2). Originating from a non-profit organization
located on Wayne States campus, ACUSP is a program that aimed to reduce crime rates in
Midtown of Detroit by promoting safety and community throughout the city. ACUSP has closely
integrated their efforts with local communities in order to motivate them to start crime-fighting
initiatives on their own. For example, they have contributed many different efforts, including
creating block clubs and conducting neighborhood cleanups to get the community involved in
helping reduce crime, working with Detroit Police officers to locate areas where crime is
ACUSP is able to expand their reach on reducing crime by involving many different
spheres. The government sphere has been involved with ACUSP through its connections with
several government officials. Governor Rick Snyder has also heavily assisted ACUSP through
his announcement of an initiative to give ACUSP $1.1 million, with $75,000 going to ACUSPs
crime analysis, $505,200 to a scholarship program, and the remaining amount to pay ACUSP
volunteers $12,000 a year (Burns, par 6-7). ACUSP has been involved with the private sphere
6
through its close integration with the community. By being involved in block clubs and
neighborhood watches, they are able to motivate the private sphere to stop crime. Although
ACUSP is not closely integrated with the market sphere, being a non-profit organization, it does
help the market sphere by reducing crime in Detroit. By reducing crime in Detroit, it makes the
environment safer for business. This helps bring businesses into Detroit, which helps to stimulate
Detroits economy. AmeriCorps Urban Safety Program is able to expand its reach on reducing
crime by involving many different spheres. This allows the program to be successful because it
acts as the bridge between the police force and the community, allowing them to support each
other in times of need. Due to a lack of new police officers, the Detroit Police Force has been
understaffed in their efforts to fight crime in the area. With ACUSP focusing on actively
engaging members of society, the people now are motivated to fight crime in forms of
neighborhood watches and such, making reducing crime much easier with more agents working
against it.
The media has also played a positive role in helping ACUSP distribute their goals and
intentions to a wider audience. Through mentioning of ACUSP through several news sites such
as Michigan Live, Drawing Detroit, and the Kresge Foundation, ACUSP is able to show its
message to more people, hopefully being able to inspire them to volunteer and help fight against
crime in Detroit.
Although ACUSP has made great strides in helping reduce crime in Detroit, it has not
fully ameliorated the problem of crime due to some inherent weaknesses. After seeing some
success in reducing crime in Midtown, ACUSP has been looking to increase their radius of
influence into other areas of Detroit. However, since it is volunteer and community based, there
are some structures in place that make it difficult to do so. First, ACUSP would have to generate
7
a sufficient number of volunteers in different areas in Detroit, and they will have to work around
peoples inability to make long-term commitments due to busy schedules or lack of interest.
Additionally, since ACUSPs efforts are more long-term, crime will continue to exist no matter
what is done to help improve Detroit. Crime is a social structure caused by economic structures
such as poverty, and it will continue to plague Detroit as long as Detroit is in a substantial
amount of debt. Detroit would have to solve its debt problems before it can see any real
reductions in crime. Still, it does not detract from the fact that ACUSP has been successful in
reducing crime rates and has potential to be successful in areas other than just Midtown.
Another effort that has been successful in reducing crime rates in Detroit is MindUP: a
among youth using mindful attention training which refers to bringing ones complete attention
to the present experience" (National Institute of Justice, par 1). MindUP is a program that focuses
on improving behavioral and learning tendencies in students. It offers 15 different lessons that
help improve several skills in students and help them develop a positive mindset. This program is
successful in preventing crime through targeting youth, modifying their mindsets and preventing
them from committing crime in the first place. It targets students at the elementary school age
because, it is during [that] developmental period that childrens personalities, behaviors, and
competencies begin to consolidate into forms that persist into adolescence and adulthood
(Reichl, par 8). By enforcing positivity and awareness through their various educational
programs, MindUP can help shape the youths mindset into one that will be deterred from crime
in the future.
MindUP is able to help combat crime through its involvement with the civic sphere and
the private sphere. By integrating their programs with the students learning, they are involved
8
heavily in the private sphere. Their program can be taken from schools and also be implemented
into family homes. Due to this, children can really embrace the MindUP curriculum through
constant repetition at school and at home. This repetition makes it more likely for children to
unconsciously integrate the lessons from MindUP into their personal lifestyles, making it more
likely that MindUp will stick with a child as they grow up.
The media has also played a positive role promoting MindUP and its functions. Websites
like People.com, Science News for Students, and the Northwest Indiana Times all explain what
MindUPs program does and how it is beneficial for students. Through mediums such as news
websites, MindUP can broadcast its effects to many different audiences and hopefully expand its
While MindUP has seen results in improving childrens behavioral tendencies, it does fall
short in some aspects in reducing crime in Detroit. First, MindUP faces various economic and
structural barriers that give it difficulties in implementation. MindUP states that its program costs
around $5,000 to $10,000 to implement. Many schools in Detroit are suffering from poverty due
to Detroits substantial amount of debt, and with this, it is hard to integrate a program like
MindUP on top of the already costly curriculum. There can be fundraisers to help schools gain
the money for programs like MindUP, but to a skeptical eye, there is not much reason to raise
money for a program that might not work when it can be used to help improve the school itself.
Finally, MindUP is a long term program. It will take a long time before its effects on reducing
crime will be noticeable because these students have to grow up, and it has to be shown that they
are less likely to commit crimes in the future. It is one thing for a program to make students less
likely to speak out against teacher, and it is another thing for a program to make adults less likely
to commit crime. Despite those problems, MindUP has already seen some results in improving
9
the behaviors of children, and it is not long before those effects translate into adulthood.
Supporting the idea that multiple-sphere involvement is key to a programs success, the
Wayne State University Police Department (WSUPD) also successfully reduces crime on the
Wayne State campus with the help of the private sphere. The locally-run WSUPD has a heavy
presence throughout the campus of Wayne State University. Their patrol routes go beyond the
campuss borders and into the surrounding neighborhoods. College campuses are a dangerous
place to be in, with their theft and sexual assault rates at a high level. Despite Wayne State being
in one of the most dangerous cities in the United States, it is one of the safest college campuses
in Michigan (2017 Safest College Campuses in Michigan). Having a strong police presence
greatly decreases opportunities for crime: The Wayne State Police Department has 60 officers
who patrol the campus and the neighboring Midtown neighborhood, where serious crime has
decreased 52 percent since 2008 (Detroits Wayne State University Listed Among Safest
College Campuses In U.S). The factor that is key to the police departments success is their
push for community involvement from the private sphere. Students, along with the police force,
must constantly be on their guard and aware of their surroundings to avoid any dangerous
situations, so like many college campuses, Wayne State has blue-light emergency telephone
boxes throughout campus. Students are also encouraged to have WSUPDs emergency number
on speed dial on their phones. With students easy access to the police and their quick response
times, Wayne States campus has been made much safer. Individual involvement with the police
department is also encouraged through self-defense classes. Individuals can learn how to feel
more confident in their abilities to defend themselves through men and womens self-defense
courses. The WSUPD has support from the private sphere of life along with the government,
making it a successful department that engages more than one sphere of life.
10
A member of our group decided to take advantage of what the Wayne State Police
Department had to offer and signed up to take a Basic Rape Aggression Defense (RAD) course.
This course was a twelve-hour class, spread throughout four evenings, and it was for women of
all ages. The WSUPD offers other self-defense courses for women, as well as a Resisting
Aggression w/ Defense (RAD) class for men. Two hours of the class consisted of lectures and
presentations about the sad realities of sex crimes, and the next seven hours were self-defense
training sessions based on a variety of common situations and how to avoid becoming a victim.
The last three hours was a simulation where they applied their new skills to an interactive
situation. The combination of these three different sessions resulted in a newfound confidence
and a decrease in fear when walking around downtown among the women who took the course.
This private sphere involvement ultimately made the Wayne State campus feel safer and
decreased the likelihood that they would suffer from a sex-related crime.
Our group believes that we can generate a direct plan of action that combines the
successful efforts of all other solutions. This proposed solution will consist of a grassroots
organization piloted by Wayne State University students. This organization will be formed
through the funding of federal grants, as well as donations by citizens. The objective of this
organization is to work cohesively with local police stations, the Center for Urban Studies, and
community residents. The framework consists of the utilization of resources such as CompStat,
social spheres, and community involvement. The overall outcome of this proposed solution is to
We believe that in order for this solution to be successful, the organization needs to team
up with other various successful programs. For example, the Detroit Police Department is one of
the most efficient resources we have in reducing crime. According to The City of Detroit, reports
11
of crime had decreased 6.7% in 2016, carjackings had decreased by 39%, while robberies had
decreased 17.4%. With approximately 1,600 officers in Detroit, the Detroit Police Department is
the powerhouse when it comes to detection and reduction of crime. The proposed organization
will see much greater success when united with the Detroit Police Department.
Another program our organization can greatly be impacted from is the Center for Urban
Studies. This program is piloted by Wayne State University and has worked to reduce urban
challenges since 1967. According to the Center for Urban Studies homepage, "the mission of
Wayne State University's Center for Urban Studies is to improve understanding of and provide
serving Detroit and the metropolitan area through conducting research, developing policies and
programs, training, and much more. With the knowledge the Center for Urban Studies has
collected over the course of 50 years, the proposed organization will have the opportunity to be
The proposed solution needs a specific framework in order to successfully complete the
objective. One of the resources involved in this framework includes the program CompStat.
developed in New York to reduce and prevent crime (Report: CompStat does reduce crime, par.
2). The article continues to state that programs that resemble CompStat are responsible for a 5 to
15 percent decrease in crime. The program is implemented in more than 10 U.S. cities, including
strategies, and is also a database for crime reports. CompStat has overcome obstacles that other
programs have struggled to conquer. One of these obstacles includes the geographic location.
Many programs suggest that the issue on crime be taken to a national scale, however, CompStat
12
does a great job of scaling down the issue. This microscopic view on crime allows for a
Another resource which will be effective in our proposed solution includes the
implementation of social spheres. The proposed solution will include three social spheres: the
civic sphere, the family sphere, and the government sphere. Through the civic sphere, we will
look to operate with community organizations that offer the required manpower to create change.
Through the family sphere, we will involve members of the community who are passionate about
lowering crime rates and are willing to help make a change. Through the government sphere, we
will communicate with local police willing to assist and cooperate with community members.
The incorporation of these three social spheres will the proposed solution be able to reduce
crime.
The final resource that our proposed solution will use is the community involvement.
With Detroit as a rising city, there are many residents who are inclined to help the city return to
its thriving era. The primary issue is a lack of opportunities to volunteer around the city. Most
residents will not volunteer because of they do not know or hear about many events that are
offered. With our proposed solution, we will increase the awareness of opportunities around
Detroit, as well as increase the spread of opportunity. Examples of how the community can get
involved range from joining neighborhood watch programs to picking up trash on the street.
amount of crime in the area. As our group participated in the cleaning of local environments by
picking up trash, we have realized that through the service learning opportunity presented to us
that criminal behavior can be deterred through a clean community. Detroit's population is
upwards of 688,000, making it the largest city in the midwestern state of Michigan according to
13
the United States Census Bureau. Creating volunteer opportunities such as a local cleanup can
help Detroit's community become more involved in the city, and an increase in involvement from
local residents can help create a safer environment for the city. With the help of these residents,
the proposed solution can affect a wider area, expanding further than Detroit.
In order for the proposed solution to take place, the overcoming of various structural
obstacles must be done. One of the structural obstacles included is the cost of the creation of this
organization. However, the cost of the organization to be created is very inexpensive. One source
of revenue that can help create this organization is federal funding. There are many programs
that are being funded by the federal government that are not successful. Allowing for the
allocation of the resources from these failed programs toward the more successful programs can
be very useful. Another alternative to combat the cost of the organization is the involvement of
the community. Through donations and fundraisers, we can raise enough money to initiate our
organization. An example of a local fundraiser would be to sell t-shirts that increase awareness of
crime in Detroit.
Another structural obstacle that our proposed solution must overcome is the belief of
citizens that one person cannot make a change. This belief prevents people from helping, as they
will perceive the help as being useless. One way our proposed solution can overcome this
obstacle is by assuring the citizens that their help is very much appreciated. For example,
offering incentives, such as food and other items to working residents will convince them that
The last structural obstacle that will be addressed is the amount of power the creators of
this organization has. Our group has reached the assumption that college students do not have
much authorization in the overall maintenance of crime. However, there are many steps which
14
can be taken to increase the authority many college students wish to reduce crime. One initiative
college students can take to increase power is communicate with state senators. Communication
with these state senators can influence their ability to distribute power more respectively. This
The proposed solution can have the opportunity to become very successful. In order for
this to happen, Wayne State students interested in being a part of this organization have to reach
out and connect with local police stations, the Center for Urban Studies, and community
residents. Once these institutions are integrated into the proposed solution, the implementation of
CompStat, social spheres, and community involvement can be further expressed. Our group
believes that in order to reduce crime, the approach to the problem needs to be simultaneously
versatile and direct. With a solution involving students living in the city, the goal of reducing
When proposing a direct plan of action involving and relying on a group of people as
shortcomings and propose a subsequent plan of action that is indirect. This means that the
problem of reducing crime rates is looked at from a wider lens. In the grassroots action, the
efforts are focused on small tasks that groups of students could collectively perform that would
hopefully make a difference in the community over time. To make an impact on a larger scale,
our group is proposing a new public policy attempting to alter the way institutions control crime
rates. This policy is aimed at reducing mass incarceration through a series of steps involving
The continual war on crime in the United States has done little to diminish crimes
happening in the country but instead has caused the number of people behind bars to skyrocket in
just a few decades. Currently, the US incarcerates almost twenty-five percent of the worlds
prisoners while holding only five percent of the worlds population. (BCJ) This means that our
criminal justice system is larger than it has ever been and has to accommodate 2.3 million
imprisoned Americans. This does not mean that more crime has been occurring, it merely shows
that more people are being put behind bars for low-level crimes. In fact, it has been found that
39% of the nationwide prison population can be released with no harm to public safety.
Releasing these people would save $20 billion every year. (Time Magazine). Crime is considered
one of the biggest social problems by most citizens. However, the inflation of incarcerations and
prison sentences has not contributed to the countrys decreasing crime rates. Many prisoners,
notably those 39% who performed non-violent, low-level crimes, would benefit much more from
alternatives such as community service, treatment, or probation. In order for crime to be reduced,
those who leave prison need to be able to adapt back into society in a positive way, in order to
prevent a continuation of the same criminal behavior. Those alternatives to prison are much more
effective to help people with the issues that drive low-level crime, like involvement with drugs
for example.
The public policy our group would like to propose is strongly influenced by a program
written by the Brennan Center for Justice from NYU School of Law. Our goal of reducing crime
rates in Detroit can be achieved by challenging the way our justice system works and working to
make it fair and competent. By working to reduce mass incarceration, the justice system can
better protect our communities and improve public safety. The positive effects of reducing mass
incarceration has already been seen in states such as South Carolina, who reduced its prison
16
population by 18 percent and saw a 38 percent drop in violent crime. Other states that reduced
unnecessary punishment include California, Texas, and New York, displaying evidence that
states with the largest drops in prison populations also saw the largest reduction of crime.
transform the criminal justice system into one that can effectively fight crime and increase public
safety. This part of the policy relates to criminal justice funding and can be applied at the
national, state, and local levels. Modeling after Brennan Center, we propose that funding focuses
on programs that have been proven to work at reducing crime. To implement this, the funding
would depend partially if not entirely upon the success of the program. The program itself should
have specific goals such as reducing prison sentences, reducing recidivism, reducing number of
incarcerations, and so on. However, the Justice Department has to implement the proposal in
order to make the funding dependent on success. The proposal could be implemented by the
Justice Department - without legislation. This would reflect the indirect approach of Success-
The above chart shows how the JAGs current reports do not incentivize success, but
rather just fuel the problem of mass incarceration by encouraging more arrests. On the right of
the table is the suggested performance measures, ones that would tell a lot more about whether
the funding is being allocated towards efforts that are effectively fighting crime.
Policy advocacy is a part of this plan of action that involves collaboration with existing
organizations and groups in the community. While policymaking is on a broad scale, it can only
form between the people most educated about this new policy and the community groups that
have the most hands-on experience with the issue of public safety. This way, the policy can have
more widespread support and this will put pressure on the branches of the criminal justice system
to act accordingly.
The goal of this policy is to cause an institutional change over time. A need for change is
evident based on the research showing that our current criminal justice system is flawed and
incarcerates too many people. This public policy would best address this issue because it outlines
18
exactly how the change needs to happen. While the conditions are flexible and open to
adjustments as societal standards and life spheres change, the policy will always be aimed at
reducing crime rates in cities. It will work tirelessly towards this goal while preserving the
Although crime in Detroit is a broad issue that includes many structural barriers, our
group ultimately decided on two potential solutions that are feasible and effective in deterring
crime. The main structural barriers that hinder the progress towards stopping crime in the city
include the normalization of crime amongst residents, the lack of necessary funding to lower
crime rates, the understaffing of Detroit Police officers, to name only a few. As a result, these
structural barriers have enabled the cycle of crime to continue to spread, and in turn, crime rates
are remarkably high. Per data released from The Federal Bureau of Investigation and distributed
through Wayne States Drawing Detroit WordPress in 2015, Detroit had the highest number of
manslaughter cases at a rate of 4.4 per 10,000 residents, as compared to the next highest
manslaughter rate in southeastern Michigan of .7 per 10,000 residents in Port Huron. Crime in
Detroit has negatively impacted the city altogether. Businesses are unable to thrive under the
economic conditions resulting from high crime rates, and in turn, the citys economy is affected
as well. The remarkably high crime rates have caused Detroit residents to feel uncomfortable in
their own homes, and even more uncomfortable to perform normal daily tasks. In evaluating this
issue, our group decided that to effectively lower crime rates, we must include several spheres of
action in our proposal. After researching many different attempts to lower crime rates, our group
found a common theme in the frameworks of policies that were most effective.
In studying these many policies, our group narrowed down our proposals to two
solutions: (1) a grassroots action and (2) an institutional policy change. The grassroots solution
19
entails starting a nonprofit organization with the goal of lowering crime rates in Detroit. Much
like the mission of The Center for Urban Studies, our organization would reach out to Detroit
residents and police departments to cohesively fight against crime. Our organizations primary
function would be to bridge the communication barrier between residents and police officers
through social connection events that would not only bring the different sides together but would
Our second institutional policy change proposal to lower crime rates would be through
reducing the amount of mass incarceration on a national scale. Theoretically, by reducing the
number of criminals in society, the government would be successful in lowering crime rates;
however, through research, we realized that this strategy proved to be counterproductive. Rather
than being more cost effective, statistics show that under the current criminal justice system,
mass incarceration is extremely costly, wherein the costs outweigh the benefits. By reallocating
the amount of funding from mass incarceration toward more creative and inclusive strategies to
fight crime, the government will be more efficient in lowering crime rates. Our group could work
to integrate this policy change by lobbying policymakers and working with other government
officials interested in changing current strategies for dealing with public safety in large cities.
After assessing the necessary inputs for both solutions, our group unanimously decided
that the grassroots proposal provides a more feasible option than the policy change proposal
approach. The events that our non-profit organization would host would be inexpensive;
therefore, a tremendous amount of federal funding and fundraising would not be necessary.
Events that we would host would include building block clubs, neighborhood watches for homes
and bikes, creating safe routes to schools, boarding up vacant buildings, conducting cleanup
events and securing homes, and providing safety tips such as VIN etching. These events would
20
not incur a lot of expenses because our participants will be volunteers, and more specifically,
Detroit residents who are passionate and invested in lowering crime rates surrounding their
neighborhoods.
Alternatively, the policy advocacy approach would be less feasible because of several
barriers our group would face. Being college students, it would be extremely difficult to
coordinate our busy schedules with those of state legislators. Additionally, because our group
consists of college level freshman, we would have a difficult time establishing credibility.
lack experience or credibility. Although, the policy advocacy approach could prove to be
somewhat effective if implemented properly, the grassroots proposal allows for us to work on a
smaller, local scale, ultimately making a more realistic and effective impact in the Detroit
Our group also evaluated the overall benefits and costs of both solutions, and concluded
that the most effective solutions still lie within the grassroots action proposal. By following the
framework provided by the Center for Urban Studies, we hope to achieve the same success that
they have experienced in Midtown. Per the Kresge Foundation News Service, Since 2009, the
Midtown area of Detroit has seen a 45 percent reduction in crime with an innovative
collaboration by residents, law enforcement agencies and volunteers. (Kresge par. 2). The
organizations success was remarkable; however, because the Center for Urban Studies is an
organization piloted through Wayne State University, their efforts did not expand beyond the
Midtown area. Our hope as a group would be to partner with The Center for Urban Studies and
expand their practice beyond Midtown and into different crime afflicted areas of Detroit.
21
Alternatively, in relation to the policy change approach, it appears that lowering mass
incarceration also reduces crime. To expand, statistics have shown that there is a strong
correlation between low incarceration rates and low crime rates. Hence, although both potential
solutions have a vast amount of upside, several different organizations, such as the Center for
Urban Studies and MindUP, have had success in Detroit communities by following the grassroots
action proposal. Based on our research, our group concludes that establishing a service-based
organization would be the most effective solution to lower crime rates in Detroit.
To reiterate, the three spheres of action associated with this specific solution include the
private sphere, the civic sphere, and the government sphere. The private sphere is exposed to
daily crime, and unfortunately, Detroit residents quality of life is negatively affected. The
portion of the government sphere that is associated with our solution is primarily the local level,
rather than the state and federal level, because the local police officers deal with local crime
daily; therefore, they are more equipped to handle the crime that occurs in Detroit. Lastly, our
non-profit organization, which represents the civic sphere, would work to organize events to
form a crime fighting coalition. Our organization would collaborate with other crime fighting
agencies such as the Center for Urban Studies and The Wayne State University Police
Department. The Center for Urban Studies could offer us the opportunity to recruit new
volunteers and help us gather the needed labor force to institute change. We would also attend
CompStat events hosted by the Wayne State University Police Department to identify crime
hotspots and understand which areas to target. This multi-sphere proposal has proven effective in
the past, and by emulating the same concepts, our hypothetical organization would be able to
the issue of public safety in Detroit, and were educated on a different perspective with regards to
crime. After ten hours of volunteering, my groupmates and I had only cleaned a couple
cleanup. Although this initially felt quite discouraging, throughout the course of volunteering, we
were constantly being motivated by residents of the area. After three hours of cleaning up public
streets plagued by garbage around the neighborhoods of a local elementary school, we felt that
there was just an overwhelming amount of trash and that we could not make a real difference.
Much to our surprise, as we were working, a lady in a car drove by and stopped and rolled down
her window to encourage us. We began talking to her and she was extremely thankful for the
efforts we were putting in, and even asked how she could get involved with future events. As we
continued to work, more cars would come to thank us for our work and one person joined us in
cleaning. This provided an immense amount of motivation and taught my groupmates and myself
a very important lesson: Detroit residents are extremely passionate about their city and care
about its well-being enough to get involved when they see that there is hope for a collective
effort to work towards progress. However, the common misconception among most is that the
structural barriers are too great to institute effective change. Amazingly, we learned that when
provided with an institution to combat crime, Detroit residents are more than willing to help. We
businesses, volunteers and the police that will ultimately affect positive change.
groupmates and I have established an effective proposal to lower crime rates. We were able to
23
expand our knowledge through interacting with passionate community members of Detroit, and
through our research, we ourselves became invested in the well-being of Detroit. After
residents believe that the structural barriers are too difficult to overcome. Without developing
extensive knowledge regarding the history of crime, the causes and effects of crime, and the
efforts that have been made to stop crime, developing a framework to combat crime can seem an
impossible task. However, by forming an organization that follows the successful framework
established by the Center for Urban Studies, our group can be successful in lowering crime rates
Works Cited
Scholarly:
Agnew, Robert. The Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency: Storylines as a Neglected
Cause of Crime. 43 Vol. Sage Publications, 01 May 2006. Web. 21 Mar. 2017.
Alper, Mariel, and Allison T. Chappell. Sociological Spectrum: Untangling Fear of Crime: A
McDowall, David. "Poverty and Homicide in Detroit, 1926-1978." Violence and victims. 1 Vol. 1
Rios, Viridiana. "The Impact of Crime and Violence on Economic Sector Diversity." (n.d.): n.
Schonert-Reichl, Kimberly A., Eva Oberle, Molly Stewart Lawlor, David Abbott, Kimberly
Thomson, Tim F. Oberlander, and Adele Diamond. "Enhancing Cognitive and Social
Developmental Psychology. U.S. National Library of Medicine, Jan. 2015. Web. 26 Apr.
2017.
Williams, Candice, and James David Dickson. "Crime Stats: Detroit Marks 302 Homicides in
Eisen, Lauren-Brook, Nicole Fortier, and Timothy Ross. Reforming Funding to Reduce Mass
Incarceration: A Policy Framework and Proposal. Publication. New York City: Brennan
Opsal, Erik. "Justice Update." Justice Update: Majority of States Cut Both Crime and
Incarceration | Brennan Center for Justice. Brennan Center for Justice, 16 June 2016.
"Reducing Mass Incarceration." Reducing Mass Incarceration | Brennan Center for Justice.
Think Tanks:
McQuade, Barbara L. "Plunging Crime Rate Should Be Part of Detroit's Comeback Story. The
United States Department of Justice. United States Attorney, 20 Mar. 2015. Web. 20 Apr.
2017.
"Our Mission." Center for Urban Studies :: Wayne State University. N.p., n.d. Web. 25 Apr.
2017.
News Media:
"AmeriCorps Urban Safety Program." AmeriCorps Urban Safety Project. AmeriCorps Urban
"2017 Safest College Campuses in Michigan." Niche. N.p., n.d. Web. 28 Mar. 2017.
Burns, Gus. "Gov. Rick Snyder, Mayor Dave Bing Announce $1.1 Million, 3-year AmeriCorps
Crime Initiative." Michigan Live. MLive Media Group, 04 Nov. 2013. Web. 22 Apr.
2017.
26
Chippy Follow. "Mapping The Fear of Crime." LinkedIn SlideShare. N.p., 01 Oct. 2011. Web. 24
Apr. 2017.
"Detroit's Wayne State University Listed Among 'Safest College Campuses' In U.S." CBS
Hickey, Kathleen. "Report: CompStat Does Reduce Crime." GCN. N.p., 17 Mar. 2015. Web. 25
Apr. 2017.
Kurth, Joel, and Christine MacDonald. "Volume of Abandoned Homes 'absolutely Terrifying'."
Detroit News. The Detroit News, 25 June 2015. Web. 21 Apr. 2017.
Program Profile: MindUp, National Institute of Justice, 13 Mar. 2017. Accessed 29 Mar. 2017.
Worrall, Patrick. "FactCheck: Do Black Americans Commit More Crime?" Channel 4 News.
Eisen, Lauren-Brook, and Inimai Chettiar. "39% of Prisoners Should Not Be in Prison." Time.