Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
The global consulting industry continues to grow at a steady rate, with no immediate signs of
slowing down. Across the many flavors of management consulting, the strategy segment has
grown the most in recent history, and for good reason. Fortune 500 CEOs continue to engage
top-tier firms to help drive value to their top and bottom lines.
4.4% 189.7
181.7
172.9
30.9 4.1 %
164.5 29.7
156.9 28.7
153.1
27.7
25.3 26.7 37.7 6.6 %
35.4
32.5
30.0
27.4 28.2
70.2 HR
63.6 66.8 5.0 %
54.9 57.4 60.3 Strategy
IT
Operations
So whats wrong with this picture? Nothing really. Clearly, clients see merit and positive ROI on
management consulting spend, or they would reallocate the billions of dollars to more useful
endeavors. Yet, we are witnessing major disruption in the industry. Not because the consulting
market is broken - rather, there are a number of macro-factors lending to a reshaping of the
landscape.
2 | Page
Whats driving this?
MACRO FACTORS
Gone are the days of consultants flying first-class, eating expensive steak dinners, and working
100+ hour weeks. Enter a new model, where consultants spend a few years getting top-notch
training from pedigree firms, and then work for the clients they wantwhen they want.
A lot of factors are contributing to this changing landscape, from shifting cultural norms to
increasing client sophistication:
1 4
Clients are increasingly building Advances in technology continues
internal corporate strategy teams to allow more and more consultants
Increased Client Teams are typically staffed with Emergence of to conduct business from home
Sophistication former management consultants, Remote Workers Changes in cultural norm continue
making for sophisticated buyers to support this shift as well
2 5
New players (e.g. curated networks, New models rely on robust
freelancers, etc.) are entering the databases to source and vet talent
Emergence of Lower management consulting market Digitization / for clients
Cost Players Able to offer clients reduced fees Big Data Technology Technology is quickly becoming a
with comparable talent to larger core capability for all consulting
firms models
3 6
Traditionally high turnover at Larger players continue acquiring
management consulting firms mid-sized strategy firms to offer
Growing As larger firms grow, their alumni Consolidation of clients full-suite of services
Alumni Pools networks do toproviding ideal Mature Players Mid-size players increasingly
talent pools for lower cost players challenged to compete in market
where scale benefits matter
The goods news? Like most markets, increased efficiencies mean more winners than losers.
Clients end up paying lower rates, thus increasing their ROI on consulting spend and driving
shareholder value. Consultants actually earn more on a per-hour basis, waste less time brown-
nosing partners, and theoretically get more time with their families.
3 | Page
What are the prevailing models?
KEY BENEFITS
There are three major types of consulting models. They tend to differ based on four major
dimensions:
1. Cost / Client Pricing: How much clients are billed per hour
2. Speed of Deployment: How quickly an engagement can be kicked-off
3. Talent / Experience: How experienced the consultants are
4. Core Capabilities: What these firms must excel at to win
Examples
4 | Page
Is traditional management consulting dead?
NEAR TERM PROSPECTS
Emerging models do not pose a significant threat to traditional firms rather, they should be
viewed as complimentary players. Each of these models has an important place in the
consulting value proposition for clients.
Ideal Model
Traditional Curated Freelance
Consulting Model Network Model Model
Brand name matters Value / cost more important Speed and cost are prevailing
Partner expertise is required than brand concern
Rationale
Large consulting and client Smaller teams (1-3) can drive Significant portion of freelance
teams necessary work independently network in graduate school
While each of the models has an ideal use-case, we can still expect competitors to grab share
in other areas. For example, PE firms are increasingly hiring consultants from the curated
network firms to run high-profile operational initiatives.
The future largely remains in question for the industry as a whole, and each model has their
own challenges. Traditional firms will need to be nimble and leverage technology when possible.
Emerging models, on the other hand, will likely need to build a certain level of in-house
capabilities if they want to continue to grow. Regardless of the outcome, it seems that clients will
surely see more and more value for their money.
5 | Page
Example: Cost Savings on a Consulting Engagement
ECA VS. EQUIVALENT TOP-TIER FIRM
Cost Comparison
ECA vs. Equivalent Top-Tier Firm
20%
ECA Rates Flexible Travel No Partner
~50% Less Arrangements Overhead
Up to 80% savings,
when compared to the
50% 20% 10% 80% traditional management
consulting model
Why ECA?
WHAT MAKES US DIFFERENT
Ex-Consultants Agency is extremely well equipped to assist companies with various consulting
engagements. We are redefining the way clients utilize top-tier consultants. Our leadership team
is comprised of top-tier management consultants and we have built a robust technology platform.
Our model is backed by a set of differentiating capabilities:
6 | Page
5.
QUESTIONS
The information contained in this publication is for general information purposes only. The information is provided by Ex-Consultants Agency LLC and while we
endeavor to keep the information up to date and correct, we make no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, about the completeness, accuracy,
reliability, suitability or availability with respect to the information, products, services, or related graphics contained in the publication for any purpose. Any reliance
you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
7 | Page