Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
2.) Agree criteria for development of Study Alignment options and associated C/S Structures for
input into overall Study cost summary
3.) Identify Risks and Opportunities for development / mitigation
4.) Identify information requirements for development of Alignment Options etc. and understand
available and missing data
5.) Agree set of constraints / assumptions / design criteria proposed for the Study development
used to-date
6.) Review and agree / accept / pose modifications for development to preliminary alignment to-date
Alignment & Civil Workshop - Agenda
Desktop study
Further development (next phase)
needs to take into account any existing management framework
Framework needs to be in place to develop action plans, monitor & measure
and report performance
indicators need to be discussed and agreed stakeholders
Project Zefram Cochrane
Quartenary
Tertiary
Cretaceous-Jurassic
Triassic
Carboniferous
Devonian
Proposed Alignment and
Acid Intrusives Stations Location
Geology Plan of Station along the HSR Corridor
Quartenary
Tertiary
Cretaceous-Jurassic
Triassic
Carboniferous
Devonian
Devonian
A Acid Intrusives
Kuala Lumpur Station
Challenges in Limestone Formation
Quartenary
Tertiary
Main geological formation are
Cretaceous-Jurassic
Tertiary (sandstone, shale, B
Quartenary
Main geological formation
Tertiary
Cretaceous-Jurassic
are Devonian (phyllite,
Triassic schist and slate) and acid
Carboniferous intrusives
Devonian
Acid Intrusives
Melaka / Ayer Keroh Station
Challenges in Devonian
Quartenary
Tertiary
Cretaceous-Jurassic
Triassic
Carboniferous
Devonian
Acid Intrusives
Quartenary
Tertiary
Devonian
Acid Intrusives
Nusajaya Station
Challenges in Triassic
FORMATION
KALLANG MARINE CLAY
OLD ALLUVIUM
GOMBAK NORITE
SAJAHAT
Proposed Corridor
Singapore Station
Source: Geological map of Singapore DSTA, 2009
Overall
Malaysia route, the possible rail might be on
at-grade / embankment
elevated especially if the route crossing the river
tunnel in urban area
bridge crossing Straits of Johor
SECTION SHAPE
Construction methods
FREE CROSS-SECTION
Aerodynamic effects
3. Plan and profile for proposed tunnel apart from overall alignment
6. Risks to Project Win
Risks to Project Win
Agreed to-date
Trip Times KUL 2 SIN 90mins
Operational Patterns Express / Non Express, No Freight.
Speed Preferred design speed of 350km/h
Stations & Interconnection with other modes As per station workshop 13th July 2013
CIQ & OCC Located in Singapore
NSE Route Following parallel if reasonably practical
Safety & Security Total exclusion of ROW, no at grade crossings
To Be Agreed
Rollingstock Provider Preference / adoption of
Safety & Security - Extreme Events, maintenance time periods, crippled trains, crossovers etc.
Main & Satellite Depots Number & General Location
Stabling - Strategies
Passing & Maintenance Equipment Sidings Number & General Location
Utilities Diversions / Building Protections
Alignment Physical & Political Constraints
Appreciated to-date
Known No Go Areas , areas of SSSI, Heritage (National / International)
RAMSAR Consequences of locations
Flood Plains
Seismic
Not understood yet
Land ownership
Compatibility with existing development plans
Socio Economic Drivers
Land Take
Noise & Vibration Construction & Operation phases
Any particular under/over development constraints
Geotechnical
General appreciation of alignment conditions
Typical foundation solutions including ground improvement
Embankments and Cutting Typical Sections
Alignment Design Constraints
Agreed to-date
Alignment - Design Standards UIC / Euro Norms Minimum Curves Gradients etc..
Vertical Alignment Basis of developments, Google Earth Accuracy
Segregated HSR , non-shared use rail system
Train Length 400m
Platform Sizes 400m
Seismic Methodology
To be confirmed
Maintenance Zones ROW / Access requirements
Design Clearances To existing infrastructure (road / rail / utilities) over / above
Corridor Width, Following NSE?
Rolling Stock Parameters Specific Design Loads
Train Envelopes
Project Strategy Constraints
Selling Climate Positive What does it mean for alignment and civil / structural?
Costs Accuracy Understandings / Contingency Levels
Maintenance Strategies Balancing CAPEX vs.. OPEX (e.g.. Ballast Vs. Slab)
Project Zefram Cochrane
At Grade Track
Elevated Track
Underground Track
Utility Diversions
Building Protections
Preliminary Alignment To-Date
Civil & Structures
At Grade Track
Elevated Track Viaduct / Bridge Design
1. Design Considerations
2. Design Codes and Specifications
3. Existing HSR Viaducts / Bridges
Design Considerations Structural Performance
Design Life. For bridges designed to British Standards, design life shall be 120 years.
Replaceable elements such as expansion joints may be designed to a shorter term.
Seismic Performance. The seismic characteristics of the region along the alignment lead
to response spectra for Earthquake Events to be used in design. Resistance to damage or
collapse from these events are then considered.
0.35
TR2500
0.30 TR475
0.25
Spectral Acc. (g)
0.20
0.15
0.10
0.05
0.00
0.1 1 10
Period (sec)
Site-Specific Ground Response Spectra
used in design of Penang Second Bridge
Design Considerations Structural Performance
Repairability. Design for pre-determined failure points and level of associated damage shall provide
for fast repair and return to service.
Passenger Comfort. Passenger comfort criteria require that the viaduct structures are stiff and rigid.
Load-Bearing Capacity. The viaduct shall be designed to carry the HSR dynamic live loads.
Fatigue. The viaduct shall be designed to resist fatigue damage due to vibration.
Underground Track
> 500m long, slower speed < 500m long, higher speed
Civil / Structural
Utility Diversions
Building Protections
Preliminary Alignment To-Date
Overall alignment KUL to SIN
Nusajaya
Kuala Lumpur
Singapore