Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
From a brief study of the various Han dynasty tombs, we notice that many of the prominent ones are
filled with objects and artwork that give us important clues into the lives of the Han dynasty Chinese people.
More importantly, by examining the details of these objects we can get a sense of their values and beliefs
about the afterlife, as well as the types of issues they were concerned about when preparing a tomb for a
deceased family member. Different objects had different purposes with regards to preparing the soul for the
afterlife. We will first divide the objects into three categories. The first is daily life objects, or objects
related to the relatives daily life. The second category is ritual objects, and the third category is objects used
primarily for symbolism, or the symbol category. We will then observe objects belonging to each category
to conclude that daily life objects showed an increasingly abstract view toward the after life, ritual objects
showed filial piety and reverence towards the deceased, and symbol objects showed a desire to protect the
We will first categorize the images. However, it is important to note that these categories are only
loosely defined and it is possible to make arguments for putting an image in multiple categories. For the sake
of this discussion, it is not so important that an image belongs to multiple categories and as long as there is a
good reason for it to belong to a certain category, it is sufficient. Under the daily life category, we will
further subdivide it by human and nonhuman objects because this leads to a more organized manner of
description. The images classified under daily life (non-human) are Image 1: The Stove, Image 2: The
Granary, Image 3: Farm Shed, Image 4: Pigsty with Latrines. The images classified under daily life (human
form) are images 10,11,13 of various attendants. Next, we categorize the ritual objects as Image 9: Ritual
cup, Image 15: Incense Burners and Image 16: The Two Offering Jars. Finally, we categorize the symbol
objects as image Image 7: The Chimera, Image 8: The mastiff, Image 12: Grave Guardian Demon, Image 14:
The nonhuman daily life objects show that the Han dynasty Chinese had a slightly abstract view of
the afterlife. First we will note the size of all of these objects. They are very small compared to what they
Apoorva Shah
would be in real life. Unlike the Qin emperors tomb where the artifacts were life-sized, these objects make
no pretense of being life like. In fact, all of the details are minimalistically done so as to convey only the
idea of the object that they represent and nothing more. First let us consider Image 2: The Granary. The
material is earthenware and it is all connected as one complete piece. This is designed to convey the simple
idea of a granary as the decoration is minimal and all of its features are considered bare essentials. First
observe the legs. It might seem that this is an attempt at adding intricacy, since they are not standard legs
and more so resembling some animal. However, they lack any detail, only the bare outline of their form is
visible as well as some appendages. One possible interpretation of this is that it is supposed to represent a
real-life granary which might have had such details in the animal-shaped legs. Thus, this small clay granary
is not meant to be a model replica, but more as a symbol for a granary. The other carvings on this granary
are simple and not ornate, such as the markings on the sides and the criss-cross pattern. Next, we turn our
attention to Image 4, The Pigsty with Latrines. Starting from the top, we see a rudimentary clay roof over a
small room with a basic window. In the center, is a pit with a small pig. There is very little embellishment.
We only notice some faint criss-cross markings on the platform leading into the room. Otherwise, it is very
bare. Note that this is also made of earthenware. Finally, we turn our attention to the stairs. These stairs are
not very realistic as we can see they lack the definition to actually help someone climb. Similar to the feet of
the granary, these stairs only serve to illustrate the concept of stairs and are not actually meant to be a real
life miniature model of stairs in a Pigsty. The stove and farm shed (images 1 and 3) are also similarly basic,
and capture only the essentials parts of each objects real-life counterpart. This shows that the the Han
dynasty people chose to think of the after life in a much more abstract and symbolic manner. Unlike the
extreme detail in Qin Shi Huang Dis tomb, the Han dynasty people found it more important to convey the
Now we examine the Tomb attendants to show that they are also similarly fundamental. In image
11, we see a Male Tomb Attendant standing at attention, and he was presumably holding a staff given the
position of his hands. First, notice that he is not life-sized. Next, we observe that he is wearing a long robe,
Apoorva Shah
which is part of his clay figure. The robe is painted yellow and white and it obscures his anatomy. His face
has all the basic features but they are not sharp enough to determine his age or whether he is young or old. In
image 12, the standing tomb Attendants are an example of an even more fundamental form. The only
discernable human quality in them is their face and general outline of the shoulders and neck. Otherwise,
their body is flat, and their arms and legs are not visible. Thus, we see that the makers of these attendants
only wanted to convey the basic concept of the attendants. The female attendants in image 10 are similarly
fundamental, and do not contain any extra details. So this shows that the Han dynasty Chinese were more
focused on conveying the concept of the daily life objects rather than the actual objects themselves, and it
Observing the ritual objects found in Han dynasty tombs show that another major concern for the
Han dynasty people was to show filial piety and reverence towards the deceased. In image 9, we see an
ornate ritual cup. It looks like it is made of bronze and the mouth is much wider than the base. There are
two knobs at the top and a handle at the center. This cup is not meant for everyday drinking because if we
notice the narrowness of the spout, it is hard to sip from, so this object was placed in the tomb for the purpose
of ritual. Unlike the objects in the daily life category, this one also has some elaborate designs in the center
strip. One interpretation for this is that the cup was used for ritual by the organizers of the tomb and this
shows reverence towards the deceased family member, as well as possible filial piety. Another example of
reverence and filial piety is seen in Image 16, the two jars. We first notice the very unique shape of the jars.
The horizontal cross sections of the jars are square, while the vertical cross sections of the jars are very
curvy. This contrast gives the jars a very striking and interesting design. Next, notice that the entire surface
of the jars is used as a canvas for the painting of some monster, most likely a dragon. As a painting, this is
partitioned off into sections divided by a white strip. Furthermore the use of white color catches the eyes and
it stands out from the other colors which are duller. These jars stored rice which was used as an offering to
the deceased, thus showing reverence and filial piety. Finally, note that these jars are also made of
earthenware. If we compare the jars to the ones found in the farm shed (Image 3). We note the contrast.
Apoorva Shah
These jars are elaborately painted while the ones in the farm shed are not. This suggests the function of the
jars was more for reverence, and ritual, rather than daily life. Finally, we look at the incense burners in
image 15. These are also both ornate, made of bronze, and in the shape of a mountain, which is meant to
symbolize immortality. So the ritual objects show that reverence and filial piety was an important
Finally we turn our attention to the symbol objects, which were used to protect the soul of the
deceased. In image 8 of the mastiff, we note that dogs had a protective function in Chinese spirituality. The
function of this dog is mainly symbolic and we can infer this from the size, as it is fairly small. It also
contains a ring on its back which suggests that it was attached in some manner. Other symbolic objects were
used to convey the concept of immortality such as Image 17 with the eternal riding dragons. In this bronze
piece, we can only see the silhouette of the dragons and their rider. The surface of the pieces is flat, and the
main image that is being conveyed is that of a rider on a dragon, with very few other details. Another object
with a protective function is image 7 with the Chimera and image 12 with the Grave Guardian Demon. The
Guardian Demon is another example of a minimalistic design, The most prominent feature is the two horns
sticking out of its head but there very few other intricate details. Thus the symbol objects, were meant to
convey ideas of immortality and protection for the soul, but were not necessarily expected to have a greater
After observing the three categories of objects, we see that the main purpose of them was to convey
certain ideas, such as protection of the soul, immortality, mundane life, filial piety, and reverence. However,
the primary function was to convey the concepts and nothing more. The objects were not expected to spring
to life in the afterlife, especially because they were not life-sized. Rather, these objects represented a more
List of Images
Image 1: Stove
Apoorva Shah
Image 2: Granary
Apoorva Shah
Image 5: Granary
Apoorva Shah
Image 7: Chimera
Apoorva Shah
Image 8: Dog(Mastiff)
Apoorva Shah