INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF)

Name of Employee: ROGELIO R. GONIA JR. Name of Rater: CAROLINA A. TAPAR

Position: TEACHER III Position: PRINCIPAL 1
Division: ANTIPOLO CITY Date of Review: ______________________________
Rating Period: SY: 2016-2017
TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED DURING
EVALUATION
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS Scor
RATING
e
Weig
OBJECTIVE TIMELIN ht
MFO KRAs Efficiency Timeliness Actu
S E per
Quality al
KRA Q E T
Resul
t
Teaching 1. June 30% 5- Assisted the 5-
Assisted 2016 principal in inspecting Checked,evalauted
and
the To and evaluating DLL and submitted the
Learning principal March and other DepEd required report to
Process in 2017 forms 100% of the the office
checking assigned teachers regarding the
and assigned DLL and
evaluating 4- Assisted the deped forms
teachers principal in inspecting before the due
DLL and and evaluating DLL date
other and other DepEd 4-
DepEd forms 70% of the Checked,evalauted
forms assigned teachers and submitted the
once in required report to
every end 3- Assisted the the office
of the principal in inspecting regarding the
month and evaluating DLL assigned DLL and
and other DepEd deped forms on
 forms 50% of the the deadline of
assigned teachers submission
3-
2- Assisted the Checked,evalauted
principal in inspecting and submitted the
and evaluating DLL required report to
and other DepEd the office
forms 400% of the regarding the
assigned teachers assigned DLL and
1- Assisted the deped forms after
principal in inspecting the deadline of
and evaluating DLL submission
and other DepEd 2-Checked and
forms 20% of the evaluated the
assigned teachers 5- Attained 80 and assigned DLL and
above of the deped forms
learning before the end of
competencies as the month
June shown in the 1-Checked and
5-Has provided
2016 Reflection. evaluated the
remedial learning
2. To 4- Attained 70% to assigned DLL and
activities for 51 and
Facilitated March 79% of the learning deped forms after
above of the pupils
learning in 2017 competencies as the end of the
handled for every
classroom shown in the month
rating period.
through Reflection
4-Has provided
functional 3- Attained 60% to
remedial learning
/Lesson 69% of the learning
activities for 41 to 50
Logs and competencies as
of the pupils
innovative shown in the
handled for every
teaching Reflection
rating period.
and 2- Attained 50% to
3-Has provided
remedial 59% of the learning
remedial learning
strategies competencies as
activities for21 to 40
to pupils of the pupils shown in the
handled handled for every Reflection
daily and rating period. 1.Attained 49% and
to 2-Has provided below of the
improve remedial learning learning
the result activities for 15 to competencies as
by 20 of the pupils shown in the
periodic handled for every Reflection
assessme rating period.
nt/NAT 1-Has provided
Viand III remedial learning
(10%) June activities for 10 and
2016 below of the pupils 5- Attained 81%
To handled for every and above of the
March rating period. learning tasks
2017 applied by the pupils
as shown in the
3. portfolios, learning
Monitored 5- Has provided tasks forms, projects
appropriat learning task suited to and recitations.
e reading the span of interest of 4- Attained 66% to
programs, 30 and above 80% of the learning
learning pupils. of the learning tasks
tasks, 4- Has provided applied by the pupils
portfolio learning task suited to as shown in the
and the span of interest of portfolios, learning
projects 25 pupils. tasks forms, projects
that 3- Has provided and recitations.
support learning task suited to 3. Attained 46% to
developm the span of interest of 65% of the learning
ent of 20 pupils. of the learning tasks
good 2- Has provided applied by the pupils
study learning task suited to as shown in the
habits of
 35 pupils the span of interest of portfolios, learning
throughou 15 pupils. tasks forms, projects
t the 1.Has provided and recitations.
RPMS learning task suited 2- Attained 31% to
cycle. to the span of 45% of the learning
(10%) interest of the of the learning tasks
pupils 10 pupils and applied by the pupils
below as shown in the
portfolios, learning
tasks forms, projects
and recitations.
1. Attained 30 %
and below of the
learning of the
learning tasks
applied by the pupils
as shown in the
portfolios, learning
tasks forms, projects
and recitations.
Pupils 1 Attained August 20% 5- 100% of the 5 Evaluated 6
75% and 2015 pupils progress Learning areas 3
Outcome above to 5 days after
To was evaluated with
s desired
March test results and
Periodical Test.
learning 4 Evaluated 6
competencie 2016 analysis Learning areas 6
s in one 4- 85% to 99% of to 10 days after
grading the pupils Periodical Test.
period
progress was 3 Evaluated 6
(7%) Learning areas 11-
evaluated with test
results and analysis 15 days after
Periodical Test.
3- 70% to 84% of
2 Evaluated 6
the pupils Learning areas 16-
progress was 20days after
 evaluated with test Periodical Test.
results and analysis 1 Evaluated 6
2- 51% to 69% of Learning areas 1
month after
the pupils
Periodical Test.
progress was
evaluated with test
results and analysis.
1- 50% and below 5-Submitted the
of the pupils updated pupils
2.. June progress was
Maintained
student records
2016 evaluated with test and intervention
and updated
pupils/stude To results and analysis. records 3 days
nts schools March after the periodical
records, 2017 5- Maintained and updated
100% and above
test
intervention
records and pupils/students school 4- Submitted the
class records records. updated pupils
97% and above
(8%) 4-Maintained and updated student records
80-96% pupils/students and intervention
school records
87%-96%
records 1 week
3- Maintained and after the periodical
updated75-80 % test
pupils/students school
records 3- Submitted the
75%-86% updated pupils
(CRITERIA X 0.75)
2- Maintained and updated
student records
51-75% pupils/students and intervention
records records 2 week
38%-74%
1- Maintained and updated after the periodical
50% and below test
pupils/students school
records
2-submitted pupils
37% and below student records
and intervention
records beyond
the required date
 of submission
1- Submitted an
incomplete pupils
student records
and intervention
3. records 2 week
Conducted after the periodical
intervention
5 Conducted test
or
enrichment intervention programs as
program to June basis/benchmark for plan
improve the of action resulting to an
class 2016
increase of 10% to the
performance To school targeted MPS
at the end of
March 5-Has offered 100% 4 Conducted
school year
(5%) 2017 enrichment/program intervention program as
to 36 Grade Two-1 basis/benchmark for plan
of action resulting to an
pupils and 100% increase of 5% to the
intervention program subject/year level
pupils who need it. targeted MPS
4-Has offered 3 conducted
intervention program
enrichment/interventi
which contributed to the
on program to 85% students academic
to 99% of the performance in the class
pupils who need it. 2 prepared a proposal
3-Has offered for intervention program
1 conceptualized an
enrichment/interventi intervention program
on program to 70%
to 84% of the
pupils who need it.
2-Has offered
enrichment/interventi
on program 51% to
69% of the pupils
who need it.
 1-Has offered
enrichment/interventi
on program to 50%
and below of the
pupils who need it
Personal 1.Assisted June 20% 5-Served as chairman 5-Assisted and
and 2015 in giving technical facilitated technical
and facilitated assistance to 75%
To assistance during
Professio technical March School Seminar within -100% of co-teachers
nal assistance on matters pertaining
2016 the RPMS Cycle
to co- to enhancement, skills
Developme
teachers on and instructional
nt matters competence during
pertaining 4-Served as co- the RPM Cycle
to chairman in giving
enhanceme technical assistance 4-Assisted and
nt, skills facilitated technical
during School
and assistance to 40% to
Seminar within the
instruction 75% of co-teachers on
RPMS Cycle
al matters pertaining to
competenc enhancement, skills
e and instructional
3-Assisted and competence during
facilitated twice in the RPM Cycle
giving technical
assistance during 3-Assisted and
facilitated technical
School Seminar within
assistance to 30% of
the RPMS Cycle
co-teachers on
matters pertaining to
2-Assisted and enhancement, skills
facilitated once in and instructional
giving technical competence during
assistance during the RPM Cycle
School Seminar within
2.Assisted and
the RPMS Cycle
 facilitated technical
assistance to 20% of
1-Assisted ad
co-teachers on
participated technical
matters pertaining to
assistance during enhancement, skills
School Seminar and instructional
competence during 5-conducted LAC
the RPMS cycle session twice in a
semester
1.Assisted and 4- conducted LAC
facilitated technical session once in a
assistance to 10% of semester
co-teachers on 3- conducted LAC
matters pertaining to
session once a
June enhancement, skills
year
and instructional
2016 2. assisted LAC
competence during
To session twice in a
the RPMS cycle
March semester
2. 2017 1- assisted LAC
Organized session once in a
at least one semester
School
5-Evaluated the
activity
conducted school
activity during the
RPMS cycle
4-Conducted one
5 participated in
school activity
more than 4
during the RPMS professional
cycle development activities
3- organized school in one rating period
activity during the 4 participated in 4
June 5 Attended in professional
related activities for RPMS cycle
2016 development activities
self-growth and 2- proposed school in one rating period
To development in activity during the 3 participated in 3
 March international level RPMS cycle professional
4 Attended in related development activities
2017 1- conceptualized
3. Attended activities for self- in one rating period
school activity 2 participated in 2
100% of growth and
during the RPMS professional
professiona development in
national level cycle development activities
l meetings, in one rating period
in-service 3 Attended in
1 participated in 1
trainings related activities for professional
and related self-growth and development activities
activities development in in one rating period
for self- regional level
growth and
2 Attended in
related activities for
advanceme
self-growth and
nt
development in
division level
1 Attended in
related activities for
self growth and
development in
school level

Community 1. Attended June 10% 5- attended 4 HRPTA 5-Attended 4 HRPTA

regular/ 2016 meetings/ meetings was
Involvement periodic To conferences in one accomplished with
HRPTA
March rating cycle evidences.
Meetings/
Conferences 2017
4- - attended 3 4- Attended 3 HRPTA
 in all the HRPTA meetings/ meetings was
parents of conferences in one accomplished with
pupils to rating cycle evidences.
report pupils
progress (5%)
3- - attended 2 3- Attended 2 HRPTA
HRPTA meetings/ meetings was
conferences in one accomplished with
rating cycle evidences.

2- - attended 1 2- Attended 1 HRPTA

HRPTA meetings/ meetings was
conferences in one accomplished with
rating cycle evidences.

1- Planned to attend 1- Planned to HRPTA

HRPTA meetings and meetings
conferences.

2. Invited and
ensure 5- donations of
participation of stakeholders was
August received,
stakeholders
2016 recognized,
in SBM within
the RPMS To disbursed, liquidated
cycle (5%) March and utilized with
5-3 stakeholder proper
2017 donated and documentation
participated in school 4- donations of
activities and projects stakeholders was
in SBM received,
recognized,
disbursed, liquidated
and utilized
4-2 stakeholder 3- donations of
donated and stakeholders was
 participated in school
activities and projects
in SBM
3-1 stakeholder
donated and
participated in school
activities and projects
in SBM
2- invited stakeholder
to participate in
school activities and
3.Paricipated
in projects in SBM
projects/eve 1- send
nts/activities
with external communication to
funding/ stakeholder who will
sponsorship
donate and
within one
rating period participate in school
activities and projects
in SBM
5 participated a
partnership with
community as a long term
learning resource
4 used community as a external funding/
learning resource during
instruction at least thrice
in each quarter
3 used community as a an
learning resource during
received,
recognized,
disbursed and
liquidated
2- donations of
Stakeholders was
received, recognized
and disburse
1- Donations of
stakeholders was
received and
recognized
5- participated 2
initiated projects/
events/activities with
external funding/
sponsorship within one
rating period
4- participated 1
initiated projects/
events/activities with
external funding/
sponsorship within one
rating period
3Participated 2 times in
an
initiated projects/
events/activities with
sponsorship within one
rating period
2Participated 1 time in
initiated projects/

instruction at least twice in
each quarter
2 used community as a
learning resource during
instruction at least once in
each quarter
1 used community as a
learning resource as
reflected in school
documents like dll/lesson
plan or enrichment
activities
events/activities with
external funding/
sponsorship within one
rating period
1planned to Participate
in an
initiated projects/
events/activities with
external funding/
sponsorship within one
rating period

5. Plus Factor June 5% School English

2016- Coordinator
March
2017

ROGELIO R. GONIA JR. CAROLINA A.TAPAR

Ratee Rater/Principal I