Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Annotated Bibliography
Will Biesecker
UWRT 1104
Annotated Bibliography
Neville, Timothy J., Salmon, Paul M., Read, Gemma J. M., Kalloniatis, Alexander C. Play on or
call a foul: testing and extending distributed situation awareness theory through sports
officiating. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, vol. 17, no. 1, Taylor & Francis
This is a scholarly journal article that as a whole is looking to assess Distributed Situation
Awareness. The article looks into the DSA model using sports officiating as an example. It
examines if the DSA model needs to be revised or extended in order to remain appropriate. The
DSA model is a form of calculating human awareness in certain situations by human reaction.
The idea is to determine human limits and approaches in handling situations. The article
proposes alternative questions and ideas that could be useful in extending the DSA model if
necessary. Sports officiating is an efficient example to use for this research as sports officials are
The authors of this article all possess reliable credentials. The four authors, Timothy J.
Neville, Paul M. Salmon, Gemma J. M. Read, and Alexander C. Kalloniatis are all professors of
the Psychology department at the University of the Sunshine Coast in Australia. The authors are
objective in determining if the DSA model is still reliable. The purpose of the communication is
to inform those in the psychology field of the usefulness and flaws of the DSA model. This
source is different than others in my bibliography as the authors are not directly addressing my
topic, but an abundance of relevant information worth using in my project is found through the
authors experimentation.
This source was very helpful. As it does not pertain directly to my inquiry, I was able to
find much useful information through the DSA experiments about sports officials. I better
Biesecker 3
understand the flaws of the officiating due to an understanding of human situational awareness.
Because of this article, I will incorporate more of why human reaction is not good enough to
This source is a developed article from a popular source. ESPN, the self-proclaimed
Worldwide leader in sports, developed this article to argue and inform that college basketball
referees have an unintentional bias towards the home team when officiated games. The main
points of the sources argument includes statistics supporting their research. This article points
out specific flaws in college basketball officiating that show the unconscious bias referees
As the article does not clearly state an author, the statistics used in the article are derived
from very credible sources. Professors conducting the research examined 365 college basketball
games during the 2004-2005 season. These professors include Kyle Anderson of Indiana
Universitys Kelley School of Business, and David Pierce of Ball State. The findings of the
professors were eventually published in The Journal of Sports Sciences. The purpose of the
communication is to address the flaws to sports fans who are passionate about the fairness of
athletics. This article is different than other sources in my bibliography as it is very straight
This source fits well into my research as it addresses specific statistics that I was finding
tough to locate previously. This will likely change my project slightly as I will now likely use
college sports in my writing. This source will likely appear in my project, depending on if I do
This source is from a reliable website, The National Basketball Referee Association
website. This source discusses how successful the referees of the NBA have been recently. The
main points of the sources arguments are that it is impossible to be perfect when officiating the
best players in the world, and that the NBA referees have been as close as possible to perfection.
The source uses statistics gathered by NBA researchers since 2015. It claims that in the final two
minutes of play, NBA officials have been 97 percent correct on their calls.
This source does not state a specific author, but states the NBRA General Counsel that
reliable website such as the NBRA. The purpose of the sources communication is to inform
NBA fans that referees are doing an acceptable job. This source compares very differently with
other sources in my bibliography as this source refutes my argument. This source argues that the
referees are doing a satisfactory job, while the argument in my project will be that the referees
This source was helpful as it was useful to see both sides of the argument. With seeing
the other side of the argument, me better understand my topic and how I will be able to shape my
argument. I will use this source in order to address both sides of the argument that I am
Jones, Lindsay H. Amid mounting controversies, NFL referees in critical moment. USA Today,
http://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/nfl/2015/12/02/referees-officiating-dean-blandino-
This is a developed article from a popular source. In this article by USA Today, the
author is assessing all of the major mistakes that NFL referees had made to that point in the 2015
NFL season. The article evaluates mistakes and looks at statistics of officiating mistakes in 2015
compared to previous seasons. The article looks at the uproar from NFL fans due to bad calls at
the end of games, but points out that there are bad calls throughout the game with less attention
paid to them. The author assesses the commonly made mistakes by NFL officials, and the
The author, Lindsay H. Jones, is an NFL expert reporter for USA Today Sports who
graduated from Emory University. In the article, she references the NFL vice president of
officiating, Dean Blandino, who recognizes the mistakes. The information is reliable as the NFL
vice president of officiating accepts the statistics listed. The communication is intended to
address the specific flaws in NFL officiating in the 2015 season and the increase in mistakes
made by the officials over time. The audience is NFL fans who are wondering why officiating
performances have been determining the outcome of games. This source is different than others
This source fits well into my research as specific instances of flawed officiating are
necessary in my argument. These specific instances will help shape my argument as there will
be specific evidence of bad calls determining the outcomes of games. This article helped me
expand my thoughts on the topic with a comparison between bad calls in the middle of the
games and bad calls at the end of games. This source will appear in my topic for the use of