Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
WE'VE GOTTA FIX THIS! HOME NEWS CORRUPTION REPORTS BATTLING CORRUPTION AFFILIATES US YOU
Headlines:
search... SEARCH
William M. Windsor has been BANNED from filing any
lawsuit anywhere in America.
Pictures don't usually do people "justice," but so-called judge join the cause
Thomas Woodrow Thrash actually looks like this. Permanent
menacing frown! Join the Cause
Mr. Thrash issued his decision at about 2:30 pm on July 15, One click to say you want HONESTY in
government.
2011. Before he could issue a formal order, I had an appeal
prepared, and I went and filed it before he could....
corruption reports
I am not surprised by this outrageous attempt to silence me, but I am sickened by it. Sexual Misconduct
Criminal Acts
Special thanks to the great group of guys who showed up to support me. Their presence
Perjury
was invaluable, as I will explain in my report....
Search All Reports
Can you spell Kangaroo Court? That's what this was. U.S. Senators
U.S. Congressmen
The courtroom was packed with people there just for this hearing. I had 8 to 10 people. Governors
There were a couple of unknown people, one of whom MAY have been a reporter. I had Mayors
two assigned "Bodyguards" from the U.S. Marshal Service who went everywhere with me Judges
but to the bathroom. Then the gallery on the Defendants' side was jammed (maybe 30 Law Enforcement
people who came special). I assume most of the people, young women, work for the
various judges who are being sued.
There are 1749 listings and 18 categories in our
Mr. Thrash asked "counsel" to stand and identify themselves and who they represent. website
Christopher Huber said he was representing the United States, who he claims is a
Defendant even though they aren't. I then stood and said: My name is William M.
resources
Windsor, and I am representing myself and all of the Americans all over the country who
have been victimized by our corrupt federal judicial system." I figured I would just call a
Web Links
Spade a Spade from the outset! I would loved to have seen the looks on the faces of the
Terms of Use
Defendants' gallery. You could have heard a pin drop!
Site Map
Mr. Thrash then refused to allow me to state objections, and he gave each side only 20
About Us
minutes to present arguments. Thrash had previously ordered that I could bring no more
than 100 pieces of paper into the room, and I was denied subpoenas for witnesses. His
previous orders are all on appeal, so he was without jurisdiction to hold the hearing, but
10 minutes a day
these corrupt people have no concern whatsoever about the facts or the law. NONE.
Spend 10-Minutes a Day helping fix America. Click
Mr. Huber gave about a 10-minute argument, which was basically that I have filed eight for projects.
lawsuits, and courts have declared me to be vexatious. That is as far from the truth as
anyone can get, as I have well-documented.
latest news
I was then allegedly given 20 minutes, but it seemed to me that he tried to cut me off a
Windsor Banned from Filing a Lawsuit
little early, but he allowed me to complete all I had planned to say anyway. At the bottom Anywhere in America
15.07.11
15.07.11
of this article, I will add my script that I spoke from. As soon as I get the transcript, I will
post it here.
Federal Judge orders that Parties No
Longer have Constitutional Rights to
I began by asking the judge if an order had already been prepared announcing the outcome Due Process
07.07.11
of the hearing. BEET RED was his face! He snapped at me, and said: "I'm not going to
2 Hearings set on Same Day as Federal
answer any of your questions." At our house, we call this "calling waisties on someone." I Judges try to "Steal Money" and avoid
Jail
figured he had already prepared the order and it wouldn't matter what I presented. By 07.07.11
asking him, he couldn't very easily immediately file an order after the hearing ended. Be Criminal Charges filed against Federal
sure to read to the end to find out how this plays out.... Judges and Clerks in Atlanta
06.07.11
I did not mince words, but I was as respectful as one can be while telling a judge that he is
Windsor succeeds in establishing
a criminal. Mr. Thrash's face seemed to get redder and redder, but he held his tongue Federal Precedent Vital to Pro Se
Parties
during my presentation. At all other times, he was like a viper, cutting me off in a 03.07.11
nanosecond.
I probably spent 10 minutes objecting to him violating every rule in the book. Then I spent support center
about 7 minutes talking about what the case is about -- the fact that the federal judicial
Fax: 770-578-1057
system employees in Atlanta operate a criminal racketeering enterprise. Once again, you
Email: bill@lawlessamerica.com
could have heard a pin drop. If you were sent to observe the hearing by the judge you work Website: www.lawlessamerica.com
for, the hearing just took on a whole new meaning for you. The smartest of them should
realize that they could go to prison, too. If there is an honest one, they might come
forward.... tweet button
At one point, I said: Your honor, I have researched you. I have run reports and analyzed Tweet
every single case you have presided over involving pro se plaintiffs. [I held the papers up.]
I was surprised to discover that you have an absolutely PERFECT record! In your entire
login
career, you have NEVER ruled in favor of a pro se plaintiff. [pause for effect.] NOT ONE!
You have the same perfect record on jury trials. No pro se plaintiff ever received their jury Username
trial. You dismiss 90% of the cases that come before you, and the other 10% lose at
summary judgment because they didn't think to file a motion to dismiss (or wanted to run Password
up the legal fees). [You could have heard a lot of pins drop on that one. Now the observers
are thinking, oh my God, he is digging into all the dirt.] Then I said, your honor, your Remember me
record really surprised and disappointed me, but I then did the same analysis for every LOGIN
federal district court judge in Atlanta, and I discovered that they all have perfect records, Forgot login?
too! There is not one case of a pro se plaintiff ever winning in federal court in Atlanta. No account yet? Register
I made it absolutely clear that I have undeniable proof of criminal racketeering by him and
the federal judges and judicial staff in Atlanta. I looked him right straight in the eye and legal notice
told him he's a crook who has violated numerous criminal statutes.
I, William M. Windsor, am not an attorney. This
website expresses my OPINIONS. This website does
Toward the end, I commented on the reported government plot to have me assassinated. I not provide legal advice. This website is to expose
said I found it hard to believe at first, but stranger things have happened. Several judicial corruption in our government and the federal
judiciary. Please read our Legal Notice and Terms.
corruption activits have been murdered mysteriously. Then, I paused for effect, and after
Site Map
several seconds of dead silence, I said: "The truth of the matter is that killing me would be
the smartest thing the government could do. That's the only way you will stop me. Rest
assured that I will spend the rest of my life exposing all of you and bringing you to justice.
I am now connected with over 10,000 people around the country, and we are organizing.
We are going to return justice to our federal judicial system. We are owed fundamental
rights, and we will get them back."
Mr. Huber had nothing to add at the end, and Mr. Thrash immediately announced that he
was entering a permanent injunction that denied me the right to file any lawsuit in any
court anywhere in America. He read right from the pre-written order that he should not
have had except in a Kangraoo Court. I hope some of the observers will write their
observations for us to read, because it was something to see.
This hearing was a visual presentation of corruption at its worst. Complete denial of due
process. A ruling issued totally to try to protect the criminal racketeering enterprise
(federal courts in Georgia) from being brought to task.
This is exactly what I expected, so don't feel bad for me. Just get mad. There's still a lot of
other acts before the fat lady sings, and no one will ever stop me from fighting and
exposing these crooks. I made that very clear to all in attendance.
The minute the hearing ended, Gary, Jeff, and I went straight to the Clerk of the Court's
Office where I filed an appeal. I beat the order that shouldn't have been prepared in
advance to the Clerk. That was the plan. Jeff and Gary commented how they saw the
judge reading from an order that was written in advance.
So, they want to stop me any way they can. They have to stop me because they will go to
prison, lose their jobs and reputations, and much more when I succeed in exposing them. I
told Mr. Thrash that if I reach a jury, they will absolutely crucify him and all of the other
Defendants. And they will.
Ladies and gentlemen, our federal judiciary is hopelessly corrupt. They are criminals. We
have to wake up our fellow Americans.
For me, I've been at this for six years, and it's only beginning. Now we are organizing a
force to be reckoned with.
Here's my script -- not all of it was used, and then I spoke extemporaneously at the end
about the plight America is in:
I Object because you (Judge Thrash) do not have any jurisdiction in this
matter.
The Court's orders were, and are, void. The U.S. Supreme Court has stated that if a court
is "without authority, its judgments and orders are regarded as nullities. They are not
voidable, but simply void; and form no bar to a recovery sought, even prior to a reversal in
opposition to them. They constitute no justification; and all persons concerned in
executing such judgments or sentences, are considered, in law, as trespassers." (Elliot v.
Piersol, 1 Pet. 328, 340, 26 U.S. 328, 340 (1828).)
Fraud was committed in the removal of this case from the Fulton County Superior Court.
This fraud means this Court does not have jurisdiction.
You have committed fraud upon the court as has the U.S. Attorney. This means this Court
does not have subject matter jurisdiction.
You have not followed mandatory statutory procedures. This means this Court does not
have subject matter jurisdiction.
You committed unlawful acts. This means this Court does not have subject matter
jurisdiction.
You have violated due process. This means this Court does not have subject matter
jurisdiction.
You are part of a criminal racketeering enterprise. This means this Court does not have
subject matter jurisdiction.
You have not complied with the rules, the Code of Judicial Conduct, or the Federal Rules of
Civil Procedure. This means this Court does not have subject matter jurisdiction.
Upon information and belief, you do not have a copy of your oath of office in your
chambers. This means this Court does not have subject matter jurisdiction.
It is clear and well-established law that a judge MUST first determine whether he has
jurisdiction before hearing and ruling in any case. You failed to do so, and your so-called
orders are void.
You have demonstrated pervasive bias, and you lost jurisdiction when you failed to recuse
yourself. A study of pro se cases that you have handled reveals that you have a proven
overwhelming bias against pro se plaintiffs. You have an extra-judicial bias against pro
se parties. According to my review of every case you have ever handled in your career
using www.versuslaw.com, no pro se plaintiff has ever won in your court; 90% of pro se
cases are dismissed, and 10% are defeated at summary judgment; no pro se plaintiff has
ever received a jury trial
Failure to follow the mandatory requirements of the law is a further evidence of the
appearance of your partiality. This required recusal.
Rankin v. Howard (1980) 633 F.2d 844, cert den. Zeller v. Rankin, 101 S.Ct.
2020, 451 U.S. 939, 68 L.Ed 2d 326. When a judge knows that he lacks jurisdiction, or
acts face of clearly statutes valid statutes expressly depriving him of jurisdiction,
judicial immunity is lost.
Whenever a judge acts where he/she does not have jurisdiction to act, the judge is
engaged in an act or acts of treason. U.S. v. Will, 449 U.S. 200, 216, 101 S.Ct. 471, 66
L.Ed.2d 392, 406 (1980); Cohens v. Virginia, 19 U.S. (6 Wheat) 264, 404, 5 L.Ed
257 (1821).
You have improperly foreclosed my access to the court. You issued an injunction without
giving me the opportunity to be heard at a hearing. Procedural due process requires notice
and an opportunity to be heard before any governmental deprivation of a property or
liberty interest. (Zipperer v. City of Fort Myers, 41 F.3d 619, 623 (11th Cir. 1995).)
Meaningful access to the courts is a Constitutional right that has been denied by you, and
your latest order denies significant rights.
(See Procup v. Strickland, 792 F.2d 1069, 1072 (11th Cir. 1986) (per curiam) (en
banc); Christopher v. Harbury, 536 U.S. 403, 415 & n.12, 122 S.Ct. 2179, 2187 &
n.12, 153 L.Ed.2d 413 (2002).)
There has been no Show Cause order issued to me as required by Eleventh Circuit law. I
have had no proper notice.
Upon these findings and consistent with Eleventh Circuit law, this Court
required Plaintiff to show cause within ten days why a Martin-Trigona
injunction should not be entered. (See Procup v. Strickland, 792 F.2d 1069
(11th Cir. 1986); Torres v. McCoun, No. 8:08-cv-1605-T-33MSS (M.D.Fla.
09/10/2008); Western Water Management, Inc. v. Brown, 40 F.3d 105, 109
(5th Cir. 1994).) [emphasis added.]
Refusal to allow filing of Motion for Remand is illegal. You have ignored the legal
requirement that you review the Notices of Removal. Your response was to order that my
Motion for Remand presented to the Clerk will not be filed. (See Exhibit 4 Letter dated
July 5, 2011 and Exhibit 5 Order refusing to allow the Motion for Remand to be filed.) As
the Notices of Removal were improper, the cases should have been remanded. (Exhibit 9 is
a true and correct copy of the Motion for Remand.)
The orders issued by you are invalid. Orders have not been signed, issued under seal, or
signed by the Clerk of the Court in violation of 28 U.S.C. 1691.
The word process at 28 U.S.C. 1691 means a court order. See Middleton Paper
Co. v. Rock River Paper Co., 19 F. 252 (C.C. W.D. Wisconsin 1884); Taylor v.
U.S., 45 F. 531 (C.C. E.D. Tennessee 1891); U.S. v. Murphy, 82 F. 893 (DCUS
Delaware 1897); Leas & McVitty v. Merriman, 132 F. 510 (C.C. W.D. Virginia
1904); U.S. v. Sharrock, 276 F. 30 (DCUS Montana 1921); In re Simon, 297 F.
942, 34 ALR 1404 (2nd Cir. 1924); Scanbe Mfg. Co. v. Tryon, 400 F.2d 598 (9 th
Cir. 1968); and Miles v. Gussin, 104 B.R. 553 (Bankruptcy D.C. 1989).
Object to being denied subpoenas. I needed to subpoena witnesses for the hearing. I
am not able to prove everything that I need to prove without subpoenaed witnesses. It is
an unthinkable violation of Constitutional rights and rights to due process to deny
subpoenas. The only reason to deny subpoenas is to try to suppress the truth and railroad
Windsor through another Kangaroo Court.
Object to being denied documents. A limit of 100 pages meant that I brought nothing.
I had organized dozens of boxes of proof.
Object to the Courts conspiracy with the Clerk of the Courts Office to block
filing of documents, destruction or disappearance of documents, etc.
Object to the outrageous and illegal filing restrictions and denial of absolutely
valid motions and documents.
Object to the unbelievable bias. Already decided the case with no facts but mine.
Object to the illegal claim of use of judicial notice. Only facts may be admitted.
Object to perjury in your orders and one giant case of obstruction of justice.
Object that you have found facts in this matter in favor of the Plaintiffs when
the only party with sworn affidavits has been me.
Object to Judge Thrashs absolutely false claim that this matter is not stayed.
The Court of Appeals has jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1292(a)(1) because one of the
district court's rulings (1) imposed an injunction; or (2) had the practical effect of an
injunction; or (3) worked a modification of an injunction. The PROTECTIVE ORDER
denies my rights and implicitly enjoins me from future exercise of rights.
See Black's Law Dictionary 784 (6th ed. 1990) (defining "injunction" as "[a] court
order prohibiting someone from doing some specified act or commanding someone to
undo some wrong or injury"). (Nken v. Holder, 129 S.Ct. 1749, 173 L.Ed.2d 550
(U.S. 04/22/2009).)
(See also KPMG, LLP v. SEC, 289 F.3d 109, 124 (D.C. Cir. 2002); Lundberg v.
United States, No. 09-01466 (D.D.C. 07/01/2010).)
Judge Thrash entered a court order prohibiting someone from doing some specified act,
and that is an injunction (or a restraining order). It is immaterial that this Court did not
call the prohibitions on Windsor an injunction or restraining order.
Some of the appealed orders may be considered collateral orders. It deals with an
important issue that is completely separate from the underlying civil action, and it is
effectively unreviewable on appeal from a final judgment because the impact cannot be
reversed, and no compensation is available for the wrongdoing.
Forgay v. Conrad, 47 U.S. (6 How.) 201, 204 (1848), which held an interlocutory
appeal will lie from an order that "directs the property in dispute to be delivered to the
complainant" and "subject[s the appellant] to irreparable injury."
("[A] federal district court and a federal court of appeals should not attempt to assert
jurisdiction over a case simultaneously. The filing of a notice of appeal is an event of
jurisdictional significance--it confers jurisdiction on the court of appeals and divests
the district court of its control over those aspects of the case involved in the appeal.").
(Bryant v. Jones, No. 1:04-cv-2462-WSD (N.D.Ga. 01/10/2007).)
I have many orders from the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit that
provide that this civil action is stayed and hundreds from federal courts everywhere.
Failure to acknowledge this stay and follow the mandatory requirements of the law is a
further evidence of the appearance of partiality of Judge Thrash. This requires recusal.
Failure to acknowledge this stay will be an act contrary to law and all of these orders
were issued without lawful authority and were void ab initio. The disqualification
motions against Judge Thrash become self-executing.
Failure to acknowledge this stay will establish a lack of jurisdiction by Judge Thrash,
and as Judge Thrash knows he is operating without jurisdiction, he loses any claim of
judicial immunity.
Rankin v. Howard (1980) 633 F.2d 844, cert den. Zeller v. Rankin, 101 S.Ct.
2020, 451 U.S. 939, 68 L.Ed 2d 326. When a judge knows that he lacks jurisdiction, or
acts face of clearly statutes valid statutes expressly depriving him of jurisdiction,
judicial immunity is lost.
Failure to acknowledge this stay will be a gross violation of the law and will be a void
order. Failure to acknowledge this stay will be a gross violation of Windsors
Constitutional rights.
Whenever a judge acts where he/she does not have jurisdiction to act, the judge is
engaged in an act or acts of treason. U.S. v. Will, 449 U.S. 200, 216, 101 S.Ct. 471, 66
L.Ed.2d 392, 406 (1980); Cohens v. Virginia, 19 U.S. (6 Wheat) 264, 404, 5 L.Ed
257 (1821).
The Eleventh Circuit has jurisdiction due to the Collateral Order Doctrine. See Cohen
v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545--47, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 1225--26, 93
L.Ed. 1528 (1949). Appealed Orders have conclusively determined disputed questions;
have resolved important issues completely separate from the merits of the action;
and are unreviewable on appeal from a final judgment, because there will be none!
Object to unclean hands. U.S. Attorneys Office has committed extensive wrongdoing.
MOVE THAT JUDGE THRASH RECUSE HIMSELF. Judge Thrash has demonstrated
pervasive bias and must recuse himself. A study of pro se cases that Judge Thrash has
handled reveals that Judge Thrash has a proven bias against pro se plaintiffs. Judge
Thrash has an extra-judicial bias against pro se parties.
All I am doing is attempting to stand up for my rights and the rights of every American
that have been stolen by this corrupt federal judicial system.
An online legal dictionary defines corrupt as having an unlawful or evil motive; especially
characterized by improper and usually unlawful conduct intended to secure a benefit for
oneself or another.
Officers of the court have conspired to perpetrate fraud directed squarely at the integrity of
the decision-making of the federal courts. Intentional misstatements of facts or omissions
of material facts with knowledge of falsity, or in reckless disregard for whether statements
were true or false were made again and again and again.
This civil action is a complaint that says the federal courts in Atlanta are a criminal
racketeering enterporise!
It is about the most fundamental legal issues that exist: justice; honesty; fair play; equal
protection; due process; Constitutional protections; the right to a fair trial before an
impartial judge; the requirement that witnesses, attorneys, and judges tell the truth; the
requirement that witnesses, attorneys, and judges do not violate the laws of the state and
the country, abuse litigants, and commit fraud upon the courts.
This civil action is about these dishonest federal judges, a judicial system that tramples the
Constitutional rights of U.S. citizens, and the failure of the various individuals authorities
established to protect citizens to do anything about this.
The United States government has committed fraud. The government told me that I would
be protected by the Constitution. The government knew this was not true. I believed the
government. I was not protected, and I was damaged.
The serious issues presented herein came to my attention through my experience in the
United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia (N.D.Ga.) and the
United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit (Eleventh Circuit). A massive
fraud upon the courts has been perpetrated by Maid of the Mist Corporation (MOTM),
Maid of the Mist Steamboat Company Ltd (Steamboat), Maids Attorneys Hawkins &
Parnell (H&P) and Mr. Carl Hugo Anderson, (Mr. Anderson), Judge Orinda D. Evans
(Judge Evans), Judge William S. Duffey (Judge Duffey), you, and others.
While I do not have proof that judges have been paid to make decisions, it is one of the
only logical explanations for what is taking place.
District Court judges in the United States District Court for the Northern District of
Georgia (N.D.Ga.) ignore the facts; invent their own facts; ignore the Federal Rules of
Civil Procedure (FRCP), the Local Rules, and the Federal Rules of Evidence (FRE);
ignore the law; ignore applicable case law; cite erroneous case law; commit perjury by
making statements that they know to be false in their orders; violate parties rights in any
way they can; commit obstruction of justice; and trample the Constitutional rights of
litigants without a thought. They manipulate the judicial system to deprive parties such as
me of their legal and Constitutional rights.
Appellate Court judges in the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
(Eleventh Circuit) ignore the facts; ignore the points of error of appellants; ignore the
law; ignore applicable case law; cite erroneous case law; issue short, inadequate decisions;
do whatever it takes to support their friends at the District Courts; and trample the
Constitutional rights of litigants.
The judicial system supports this dishonesty and illegality. The system denies any form
of valid recourse for an aggrieved citizen.
Aggrieved citizens find it next to impossible to take legal action against judges. Judges
ignore perjury. There is no law that permits an aggrieved citizen to sue over perjury. The
only recourse against a N.D.Ga. federal judge is to file a complaint with the Judicial
Council of the Eleventh Circuit (Judicial Council). The complaints must be no more than
five pages. The Judicial Council ignores valid complaints and claims there is no proof
when there is plenty. The aggrieved citizens have no recourse. Since the Supreme Court
isnt really in the business of correcting errors by the lower courts, the N.D.Ga. and the
Eleventh Circuit combine to have tyrannical power.
The Chief Judges of N.D.Ga. and the Eleventh Circuit, Judge Julie E. Carnes (Judge
Carnes) and Judge Joel F. Dubina (Judge Dubina), have ignored the wrongdoing of their
fellow judges. I wrote to them to complain. I was ignored. These judges support the
wrongdoing, and they actively participate in the wrongdoing.
The Judicial Council (headed by Judge Dubina) ignores the facts; ignores the law; says and
does whatever it takes to protect their fellow judges; and tramples the Constitutional and
legal rights of U.S. citizens. I filed a complaint against Judge Evans, and it was not
pursued. The Judicial Council ignored massive dishonesty and criminal violations.
The United States of America, the U.S. Department of Justice, Attorney General Eric
Holder, United States Attorney Sally Quillian Yates, Assistant United States Attorney
Gentry Shelnutt, the Senate Judiciary Committee and its Chairman, Senator Patrick Leahy,
the House Judiciary Committee and its Chairman, Congressman John Conyers, the
president, every member of the House and Senate, every federal appellate court judge, the
Federal Bureau of Investigation, and Special Agent Gregory Jones ignored complaints from
me about the Constitutional violations of the federal judges in N.D.Ga. and the Eleventh
Circuit. Through their inaction, they have endorsed violation of the Constitutional
protections granted the citizens of the United States that they are supposed to protect.
A free society can exist only to the extent that those charged with enforcing the law
respect it themselves. There is no more cruel tyranny than that which is exercised
under cover of the law, and with the colors of justice. The law enforcers may
themselves offer inducements to transgress if, and only if, the persons so induced were
predisposed to violate the law and the offered inducements provided only the
opportunity to act on their predispositions. A society cannot long remain free if we
permit the law enforcer to offer more than opportunity for transgression." (U.S. vs.
Jannottie, 673 F.2d 578, 614 (3d Cir. 1982).) Federal public policy, and, indeed,
basic social policy, dictate that it is better to let a technical transgressor go free than to
allow federal law enforcement officials to manufacture crime that entraps the unwary
innocent.
Since Federal policy is to let the probably guilty go free rather than risk allowing law
enforcement to break the law, it should be federal policy that judges and government
officials who break the law should lose any and all protection.
In an alleged effort to insulate judges from regular legal actions against them, these same
judges have obliterated the fundamental rights of U.S. citizens. Judges have been
sanctioned to commit crimes and break laws with no concern about consequences.
This is not the story of one litigant upset with rulings in his case. This is the story of the
fantasy of Constitutional rights and justice in the United States federal courts in Atlanta,
Georgia.
I have massive proof of all of this, and it is in the record of the courts.
I am committed to fixing this cancer. I will spend the rest of my life working to expose you
and bring you to justice.
William M. Windsor
COMMENTS
Like 9 likes. Sign Up to see what your friends like.
#3 MichelleC. 2011-07-16 0
00:43
Dear Bill,
Your friend,
Michelle Christensen
Quote
ADD COMMENT
Name (required)
Website
Notify me of follow-up comments
Refresh
Send
JComments
Judicial Corruption is Our fundamental rights Misconduct is Abuse, Dishonesty, Government Dishonesty is Bad.
rampant. Our rights to a fair have been taken away by everywhere. Dishonesty Corruption. It's all We must find honest people
trial are a myth. Many a government of wrongs. abounds. Perjury, common with Police and and make them accountable
judges are totally corrupt. Stolen by corruption. subornation of perjury, Law Enforcement. to We the People.
READ all about it. READ all about it. corruption! READ all about it. READ all about it.
READ all about it.
You are here: News Judicial Corruption and Dishonesty News Reports Windsor Banned from Filing a Lawsuit Anywhere in America
Sender:
Your E-mail:
Subject:
SEND CANCEL
Windsor Banned from Filing a Lawsuit Anywhere in
America
Friday, 15 July 2011 15:10 William M. Windsor
William M. Windsor has been BANNED from filing any
lawsuit anywhere in America.
Pictures don't usually do people "justice," but so-called
judge Thomas Woodrow Thrash actually looks like this.
Permanent menacing frown!
Mr. Thrash issued his decision at about 2:30 pm on July
15, 2011. Before he could issue a formal order, I had an
appeal prepared, and I went and filed it before he could....
Here's my script -- not all of it was used, and then I spoke extemporaneously at the end
about the plight America is in:
I Object because you (Judge Thrash) do not have any jurisdiction in this
matter.
The Court's orders were, and are, void. The U.S. Supreme Court has stated that if a
court is "without authority, its judgments and orders are regarded as nullities. They are
not voidable, but simply void; and form no bar to a recovery sought, even prior to a
reversal in opposition to them. They constitute no justification; and all persons
concerned in executing such judgments or sentences, are considered, in law, as
trespassers." (Elliot v. Piersol, 1 Pet. 328, 340, 26 U.S. 328, 340 (1828).)
Fraud was committed in the removal of this case from the Fulton County Superior
Court. This fraud means this Court does not have jurisdiction.
You have committed fraud upon the court as has the U.S. Attorney. This means this
Court does not have subject matter jurisdiction.
You have not followed mandatory statutory procedures. This means this Court does not
have subject matter jurisdiction.
You committed unlawful acts. This means this Court does not have subject matter
jurisdiction.
You have violated due process. This means this Court does not have subject matter
jurisdiction.
You are part of a criminal racketeering enterprise. This means this Court does not have
subject matter jurisdiction.
You have not complied with the rules, the Code of Judicial Conduct, or the Federal Rules
of Civil Procedure. This means this Court does not have subject matter jurisdiction.
Upon information and belief, you do not have a copy of your oath of office in your
chambers. This means this Court does not have subject matter jurisdiction.
It is clear and well-established law that a judge MUST first determine whether he has
jurisdiction before hearing and ruling in any case. You failed to do so, and your so-called
orders are void.
(Adams v. State, No. 1:07-cv-2924-WSD-CCH (N.D.Ga. 03/05/2008).) (See
Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better Env't, 523 U.S. 83, 94 (1998); see also
University of S. Ala. v. The Am. Tobacco Co., 168 F.3d 405, 410 (11th Cir.
1999) ("[O]nce a federal court determines that it is without subject matter
jurisdiction, the court is powerless to continue."). (Jean Dean v. Wells Fargo
Home Mortgage, No. 2:10-cv-564-FtM-29SPC (M.D.Fla. 04/21/2011).) (Taylor
v. Appleton, 30 F.3d 1365, 1366 (11th Cir. 1994).)
You have demonstrated pervasive bias, and you lost jurisdiction when you failed to
recuse yourself. A study of pro se cases that you have handled reveals that you have a
proven overwhelming bias against pro se plaintiffs. You have an extra-judicial bias
against pro se parties. According to my review of every case you have ever handled in
your career using www.versuslaw.com, no pro se plaintiff has ever won in your court;
90% of pro se cases are dismissed, and 10% are defeated at summary judgment; no pro
se plaintiff has ever received a jury trial
Failure to follow the mandatory requirements of the law is a further evidence of the
appearance of your partiality. This required recusal.
Disqualification is required if an objective observer would entertain reasonable
questions about the judges impartiality. If a judge's attitude or state of mind leads a
detached observer to conclude that a fair and impartial hearing is unlikely, the judge
must be disqualified." (Liteky v. U.S., 114 S.Ct. 1147 (1994).)
Rankin v. Howard (1980) 633 F.2d 844, cert den. Zeller v. Rankin, 101 S.Ct.
2020, 451 U.S. 939, 68 L.Ed 2d 326. When a judge knows that he lacks jurisdiction,
or acts face of clearly statutes valid statutes expressly depriving him of jurisdiction,
judicial immunity is lost.
"When there is no jurisdiction, there can be no discretion, for discretion is incident
to jurisdiction." Piper v. Pearson, 2 Gray 120, cited in Bradley v. Fisher, 13
Wall 335, 20 L. Ed. 646 (1872).
you have committed treason.
Whenever a judge acts where he/she does not have jurisdiction to act, the judge is
engaged in an act or acts of treason. U.S. v. Will, 449 U.S. 200, 216, 101 S.Ct. 471,
66 L.Ed.2d 392, 406 (1980); Cohens v. Virginia, 19 U.S. (6 Wheat) 264, 404, 5
L.Ed 257 (1821).
Amendment V of the U.S. Constitution provides: No person shall be...deprived of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law.... Article 1of the Georgia
Constitution provides: No person shall be deprived of life, liberty, or property
except by due process of law.
All of these rights have been violated.
You have improperly foreclosed my access to the court. You issued an injunction
without giving me the opportunity to be heard at a hearing. Procedural due process
requires notice and an opportunity to be heard before any governmental deprivation of a
property or liberty interest. (Zipperer v. City of Fort Myers, 41 F.3d 619, 623 (11th
Cir. 1995).)
Meaningful access to the courts is a Constitutional right that has been denied by you,
and your latest order denies significant rights.
(See Procup v. Strickland, 792 F.2d 1069, 1072 (11th Cir. 1986) (per curiam) (en
banc); Christopher v. Harbury, 536 U.S. 403, 415 & n.12, 122 S.Ct. 2179, 2187 &
n.12, 153 L.Ed.2d 413 (2002).)
There has been no Show Cause order issued to me as required by Eleventh Circuit law. I
have had no proper notice.
Upon these findings and consistent with Eleventh Circuit law, this Court
required Plaintiff to show cause within ten days why a Martin-Trigona
injunction should not be entered. (See Procup v. Strickland, 792 F.2d 1069
(11th Cir. 1986); Torres v. McCoun, No. 8:08-cv-1605-T-33MSS (M.D.Fla.
09/10/2008); Western Water Management, Inc. v. Brown, 40 F.3d 105, 109
(5th Cir. 1994).) [emphasis added.]
Every judge or government attorney takes an oath to support the
U.S. Constitution. Whenever any judge violates the Constitution
in the course of performing his/her duties, as TWT has, then he
has defrauded not only the Plaintiff involved, but has also the
government. TWT is paid to support the U.S. Constitution. By
not supporting the Constitution, TWT is collecting monies for
work not performed.
Removal was illegal.
Refusal to allow filing of Motion for Remand is illegal. You have ignored the
legal requirement that you review the Notices of Removal. Your response was to order
that my Motion for Remand presented to the Clerk will not be filed. (See Exhibit 4
Letter dated July 5, 2011 and Exhibit 5 Order refusing to allow the Motion for Remand
to be filed.) As the Notices of Removal were improper, the cases should have been
remanded. (Exhibit 9 is a true and correct copy of the Motion for Remand.)
Object to denial of protection following report of assassination plot against
me.
Object that there are no valid orders in this matter.
The orders issued by you are invalid. Orders have not been signed, issued under seal, or
signed by the Clerk of the Court in violation of 28 U.S.C. 1691.
The word process at 28 U.S.C. 1691 means a court order. See Middleton Paper
Co. v. Rock River Paper Co., 19 F. 252 (C.C. W.D. Wisconsin 1884); Taylor v.
U.S., 45 F. 531 (C.C. E.D. Tennessee 1891); U.S. v. Murphy, 82 F. 893 (DCUS
Delaware 1897); Leas & McVitty v. Merriman, 132 F. 510 (C.C. W.D. Virginia
1904); U.S. v. Sharrock, 276 F. 30 (DCUS Montana 1921); In re Simon, 297 F.
942, 34 ALR 1404 (2nd Cir. 1924); Scanbe Mfg. Co. v. Tryon, 400 F.2d 598 (9 th
Cir. 1968); and Miles v. Gussin, 104 B.R. 553 (Bankruptcy D.C. 1989).
Object to being denied subpoenas. I needed to subpoena witnesses for the hearing.
I am not able to prove everything that I need to prove without subpoenaed witnesses. It
is an unthinkable violation of Constitutional rights and rights to due process to deny
subpoenas. The only reason to deny subpoenas is to try to suppress the truth and
railroad Windsor through another Kangaroo Court.
Object to being denied documents. A limit of 100 pages meant that I brought
nothing. I had organized dozens of boxes of proof.
Object to timing of orders denying right to respond.
Object to the Courts conspiracy with the Clerk of the Courts Office to block
filing of documents, destruction or disappearance of documents, etc.
Object to the outrageous and illegal filing restrictions and denial of
absolutely valid motions and documents.
Object to the unbelievable bias. Already decided the case with no facts but mine.
Object to the illegal claim of use of judicial notice. Only facts may be admitted.
Object to refusal to recuse.
Object to the repeated violation of everything Rules, statutes, criminal
statutes.
Object to perjury in your orders and one giant case of obstruction of justice.
Object that you have found facts in this matter in favor of the Plaintiffs when
the only party with sworn affidavits has been me.
Object to Judge Thrashs absolutely false claim that this matter is not stayed.
The Court of Appeals has jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1292(a)(1) because one of
the district court's rulings (1) imposed an injunction; or (2) had the practical effect of an
injunction; or (3) worked a modification of an injunction. The PROTECTIVE ORDER
denies my rights and implicitly enjoins me from future exercise of rights.
Injunctions are appealable pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1292(a). A court order prohibiting
someone from doing some specified act is an injunction. The PROTECTIVE ORDER
prohibits Windsor from filing anything.
See Black's Law Dictionary 784 (6th ed. 1990) (defining "injunction" as "[a] court
order prohibiting someone from doing some specified act or commanding someone
to undo some wrong or injury"). (Nken v. Holder, 129 S.Ct. 1749, 173 L.Ed.2d 550
(U.S. 04/22/2009).)
(See also KPMG, LLP v. SEC, 289 F.3d 109, 124 (D.C. Cir. 2002); Lundberg v.
United States, No. 09-01466 (D.D.C. 07/01/2010).)
Judge Thrash entered a court order prohibiting someone from doing some specified
act, and that is an injunction (or a restraining order). It is immaterial that this Court
did not call the prohibitions on Windsor an injunction or restraining order.
we have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. 1292(a)(1) (1982), which permits an
immediate appeal from the issuance of a new or modified injunction. It is
immaterial that the court characterized the March order as a finding of contempt.
an injunction does not cease to be appealable under section 1292(a) (1) merely
because it is contained in an order for civil contempt. Szabo v. U.S. Marine
Corp., 819 F.2d 714, 718 (7th Cir. 1987); see also I.A.M. Nat'l Pension Fund
Benefit Plan A v. Cooper Indus., 252 U.S. App. D.C. 189, 789 F.2d 21, 23-24
(D.C. Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 971, 107 S. Ct. 473, 93 L. Ed. 2d 417 (1986).
Accordingly, we have jurisdiction over Eastern's appeal under 28 U.S.C. 1292(a)
(1). (06/07/88 International Association v. Eastern Airlines, Inc., No. 88-
7079, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
CIRCUIT.)
preliminary injunctions are appealable orders under 28 U.S.C. 1292(a)(1). See,
e.g., El Paso Natural Gas Co. v. Neztsosie, 526 U.S. 473, 482 (1999).
we have appellate jurisdiction to review the District Court's granting or denying of
a preliminary injunction. See Davis v. Pension Benefit Guar. Corp., 571 F.3d
1288, 1291 (D.C. Cir. 2009). A restraining order lasting longer than 14 days generally
is considered an injunction, the granting or denying of which is subject to appeal.
See Sampson v. Murray, 415 U.S. 61, 86 (1974); United States v. E-Gold,
Ltd., 521 F.3d 411, 414-15 (D.C. Cir. 2008) (order restraining "assets pending trial
and judgment" is an "injunction" under 28 U.S.C. 1292(a)(1)). (In re Any and
all Funds or Other Assets, in Brown Brothers Harriman & Co. Account
#8870792 in the Name of Tiger Eye Investments Ltd., 613 F.3d 1122
(D.C.Cir. 07/16/2010).)
Under 28 U.S.C. 1292(a)(1), the court has jurisdiction to review "[i]nterlocutory
orders of the district courts of the United States ... granting, continuing, modifying,
refusing, or dissolving injunctions, or refusing to dissolve or modify injunctions...."
28 U.S.C. 1292(a)(1). Although the provision is typically invoked to appeal
preliminary injunctions, it can be invoked to appeal permanent injunctions that are
interlocutory in nature. Smith v. Vulcan Iron Works, 165 U.S. 518 (1897); see
also Ty, Inc. v. Publ'ns Int'l Ltd., 292 F.3d 512, 516 (7th Cir. 2002), cert. denied,
123 S. Ct. 892 (2003); Cohen v. Bd. of Trs. of Univ. of Med. & Dentistry, 867
F.2d 1455, 1464 n.7 (3d Cir. 1989); CFTC v. Preferred Capital Inv. Co., 664
F.2d 1316, 1319 n.4 (5th Cir. 1982); 16 Charles Alan Wright & Arthur R. Miller,
Federal Practice and Procedure 3924 (2d ed. 1996). (National Railroad
Passenger Corporation v. ExpressTrak, L.L.C., 330 F.3d 523 (D.C.Cir.
06/06/2003).)
Under 28 U.S.C. 1292(a)(1), circuit courts have jurisdiction to review
"[i]nterlocutory orders . . . granting, continuing, modifying, refusing or dissolving
injunctions." Regardless of how the district court may choose to characterize its
order, section 1292(a)(1) applies to any order that has "the practical effect
of granting or denying an injunction," so long as it also "might have a serious,
perhaps irreparable, consequence, and . . . can be effectually challenged only by
immediate appeal." I.A.M. Nat'l Pension Fund Benefit Plan A v. Cooper
Indus., Inc., 789 F.2d 21, 23-24 (D.C. Cir. 1986) (internal quotation marks
omitted). [emphasis added.]
Some of the appealed orders may be considered collateral orders. It deals with an
important issue that is completely separate from the underlying civil action, and it is
effectively unreviewable on appeal from a final judgment because the impact cannot be
reversed, and no compensation is available for the wrongdoing.
In order to be considered a collateral order, it would have to "resolve an important
issue completely separate from the merits of the action, and be effectively unreviewable
on appeal from a final judgment." Coopers & Lybrand v. Livesay, 437 U.S. 463, 468
(1978) (footnote omitted). See Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541
(1949) (setting out the collateral order doctrine). (See also Kassuelke v. Alliant
Techsystems, Inc., 223 F.3d 929, 931 (8th Cir. 2000).)
To be appealable as a collateral order under Cohen, "the order must conclusively
determine the disputed question, resolve an important issue completely separate from
the merits of the action, and be effectively unreviewable on appeal from a final
judgment." Risjord, 449 U.S. at 375 (quoting Coopers & Lybrand v. Livesay, 437
U.S. 463, 468, 57 L. Ed. 2d 351, 98 S. Ct. 2454 (1978)). (United States v. One 1986
Ford Pickup, 56 F.3d 1181 (9th Cir. 06/08/1995).)
In this matter, Judge Thrash issued an order that had immediate and irreparable impact
on me. The statute of limitations is running on claims that I need to file, and Judge
Thrash
The courts of appeal have considered irreparable harm relevant in determining
whether jurisdiction is available pursuant to the collateral order doctrine -- which
the Government does not invoke -- but not pursuant to 1291 itself. See Trout, 891
F.2d at 335; Rosenfeld, 859 F.2d at 721-22; Palmer v. City of Chicago, 806
F.2d 1316, 1318 (7th Cir. 1986).
Forgay v. Conrad, 47 U.S. (6 How.) 201, 204 (1848), which held an interlocutory
appeal will lie from an order that "directs the property in dispute to be delivered to
the complainant" and "subject[s the appellant] to irreparable injury."
In the words of Judge Duffey:
("[A] federal district court and a federal court of appeals should not attempt to
assert jurisdiction over a case simultaneously. The filing of a notice of appeal is an
event of jurisdictional significance--it confers jurisdiction on the court of appeals
and divests the district court of its control over those aspects of the case involved in
the appeal."). (Bryant v. Jones, No. 1:04-cv-2462-WSD (N.D.Ga. 01/10/2007).)
I have many orders from the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit that
provide that this civil action is stayed and hundreds from federal courts everywhere.
Failure to acknowledge this stay and follow the mandatory requirements of the law is a
further evidence of the appearance of partiality of Judge Thrash. This requires recusal.
Disqualification is required if an objective observer would entertain reasonable
questions about the judges impartiality. If a judge's attitude or state of mind leads a
detached observer to conclude that a fair and impartial hearing is unlikely, the judge
must be disqualified." (Liteky v. U.S., 114 S.Ct. 1147 (1994).)
Failure to acknowledge this stay will be an act contrary to law and all of these orders
were issued without lawful authority and were void ab initio. The disqualification
motions against Judge Thrash become self-executing.
Failure to acknowledge this stay will establish a lack of jurisdiction by Judge Thrash,
and as Judge Thrash knows he is operating without jurisdiction, he loses any claim
of judicial immunity.
Rankin v. Howard (1980) 633 F.2d 844, cert den. Zeller v. Rankin, 101 S.Ct.
2020, 451 U.S. 939, 68 L.Ed 2d 326. When a judge knows that he lacks jurisdiction,
or acts face of clearly statutes valid statutes expressly depriving him of jurisdiction,
judicial immunity is lost.
"When there is no jurisdiction, there can be no discretion, for discretion is incident
to jurisdiction." Piper v. Pearson, 2 Gray 120, cited in Bradley v. Fisher, 13
Wall 335, 20 L. Ed. 646 (1872).
Failure to acknowledge this stay will be a gross violation of the law and will be a
void order. Failure to acknowledge this stay will be a gross violation of Windsors
Constitutional rights.
Whenever a judge acts where he/she does not have jurisdiction to act, the judge is
engaged in an act or acts of treason. U.S. v. Will, 449 U.S. 200, 216, 101 S.Ct. 471,
66 L.Ed.2d 392, 406 (1980); Cohens v. Virginia, 19 U.S. (6 Wheat) 264, 404, 5
L.Ed 257 (1821).
The Eleventh Circuit has jurisdiction due to the Collateral Order Doctrine. See
Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545--47, 69 S.Ct. 1221,
1225--26, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). Appealed Orders have conclusively determined
disputed questions; have resolved important issues completely separate from the
merits of the action; and are unreviewable on appeal from a final judgment, because
there will be none!
Object to unclean hands. U.S. Attorneys Office has committed extensive wrongdoing.
MOVE THAT JUDGE THRASH RECUSE HIMSELF. Judge Thrash has
demonstrated pervasive bias and must recuse himself. A study of pro se cases that Judge
Thrash has handled reveals that Judge Thrash has a proven bias against pro se
plaintiffs. Judge Thrash has an extra-judicial bias against pro se parties.
Move that the MOTION BE DISMISSED FOR VOID OF EVIDENCE.
THIS MOTION IS A JOKE. THIS HEARING IS A SHAM .
All I am doing is attempting to stand up for my rights and the rights of every American
that have been stolen by this corrupt federal judicial system.
Federal judges in Atlanta are corrupt.
An online legal dictionary defines corrupt as having an unlawful or evil motive;
especially characterized by improper and usually unlawful conduct intended to secure a
benefit for oneself or another.
This description properly defines you all.
Officers of the court have conspired to perpetrate fraud directed squarely at the integrity
of the decision-making of the federal courts. Intentional misstatements of facts or
omissions of material facts with knowledge of falsity, or in reckless disregard for whether
statements were true or false were made again and again and again.
This civil action is a complaint that says the federal courts in Atlanta are a criminal
racketeering enterporise!
It is about the most fundamental legal issues that exist: justice; honesty; fair play; equal
protection; due process; Constitutional protections; the right to a fair trial before an
impartial judge; the requirement that witnesses, attorneys, and judges tell the truth; the
requirement that witnesses, attorneys, and judges do not violate the laws of the state and
the country, abuse litigants, and commit fraud upon the courts.
This civil action is about these dishonest federal judges, a judicial system that tramples
the Constitutional rights of U.S. citizens, and the failure of the various individuals
authorities established to protect citizens to do anything about this.
The United States government has committed fraud. The government told me that I
would be protected by the Constitution. The government knew this was not true. I
believed the government. I was not protected, and I was damaged.
The serious issues presented herein came to my attention through my experience in the
United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia (N.D.Ga.) and the
United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit (Eleventh Circuit). A massive
fraud upon the courts has been perpetrated by Maid of the Mist Corporation (MOTM),
Maid of the Mist Steamboat Company Ltd (Steamboat), Maids Attorneys Hawkins &
Parnell (H&P) and Mr. Carl Hugo Anderson, (Mr. Anderson), Judge Orinda D. Evans
(Judge Evans), Judge William S. Duffey (Judge Duffey), you, and others.
While I do not have proof that judges have been paid to make decisions, it is one of the
only logical explanations for what is taking place.
District Court judges in the United States District Court for the Northern District of
Georgia (N.D.Ga.) ignore the facts; invent their own facts; ignore the Federal Rules of
Civil Procedure (FRCP), the Local Rules, and the Federal Rules of Evidence (FRE);
ignore the law; ignore applicable case law; cite erroneous case law; commit perjury by
making statements that they know to be false in their orders; violate parties rights in
any way they can; commit obstruction of justice; and trample the Constitutional rights of
litigants without a thought. They manipulate the judicial system to deprive parties such
as me of their legal and Constitutional rights.
Appellate Court judges in the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
(Eleventh Circuit) ignore the facts; ignore the points of error of appellants; ignore the
law; ignore applicable case law; cite erroneous case law; issue short, inadequate
decisions; do whatever it takes to support their friends at the District Courts; and
trample the Constitutional rights of litigants.
The judicial system supports this dishonesty and illegality. The system denies any
form of valid recourse for an aggrieved citizen.
Aggrieved citizens find it next to impossible to take legal action against judges. Judges
ignore perjury. There is no law that permits an aggrieved citizen to sue over perjury.
The only recourse against a N.D.Ga. federal judge is to file a complaint with the Judicial
Council of the Eleventh Circuit (Judicial Council). The complaints must be no more
than five pages. The Judicial Council ignores valid complaints and claims there is no
proof when there is plenty. The aggrieved citizens have no recourse. Since the Supreme
Court isnt really in the business of correcting errors by the lower courts, the N.D.Ga.
and the Eleventh Circuit combine to have tyrannical power.
The Chief Judges of N.D.Ga. and the Eleventh Circuit, Judge Julie E. Carnes (Judge
Carnes) and Judge Joel F. Dubina (Judge Dubina), have ignored the wrongdoing of
their fellow judges. I wrote to them to complain. I was ignored. These judges support
the wrongdoing, and they actively participate in the wrongdoing.
The Judicial Council (headed by Judge Dubina) ignores the facts; ignores the law; says
and does whatever it takes to protect their fellow judges; and tramples the Constitutional
and legal rights of U.S. citizens. I filed a complaint against Judge Evans, and it was not
pursued. The Judicial Council ignored massive dishonesty and criminal violations.
The United States of America, the U.S. Department of Justice, Attorney General Eric
Holder, United States Attorney Sally Quillian Yates, Assistant United States Attorney
Gentry Shelnutt, the Senate Judiciary Committee and its Chairman, Senator Patrick
Leahy, the House Judiciary Committee and its Chairman, Congressman John Conyers,
the president, every member of the House and Senate, every federal appellate court
judge, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, and Special Agent Gregory Jones ignored
complaints from me about the Constitutional violations of the federal judges in N.D.Ga.
and the Eleventh Circuit. Through their inaction, they have endorsed violation of the
Constitutional protections granted the citizens of the United States that they are
supposed to protect.
A free society can exist only to the extent that those charged with enforcing the law
respect it themselves. There is no more cruel tyranny than that which is exercised
under cover of the law, and with the colors of justice. The law enforcers may
themselves offer inducements to transgress if, and only if, the persons so induced
were predisposed to violate the law and the offered inducements provided only the
opportunity to act on their predispositions. A society cannot long remain free if we
permit the law enforcer to offer more than opportunity for transgression." (U.S. vs.
Jannottie, 673 F.2d 578, 614 (3d Cir. 1982).) Federal public policy, and, indeed,
basic social policy, dictate that it is better to let a technical transgressor go free than
to allow federal law enforcement officials to manufacture crime that entraps the
unwary innocent.
Since Federal policy is to let the probably guilty go free rather than risk allowing law
enforcement to break the law, it should be federal policy that judges and government
officials who break the law should lose any and all protection.
In an alleged effort to insulate judges from regular legal actions against them, these
same judges have obliterated the fundamental rights of U.S. citizens. Judges have been
sanctioned to commit crimes and break laws with no concern about consequences.
This is not the story of one litigant upset with rulings in his case. This is the story of the
fantasy of Constitutional rights and justice in the United States federal courts in Atlanta,
Georgia.
I have massive proof of all of this, and it is in the record of the courts.
I am committed to fixing this cancer. I will spend the rest of my life working to expose
you and bring you to justice.
William M. Windsor
Last Updated on Friday, 15 July 2011 19:00
Headlines:
search
Search
Advanced Search
The exact phrase search... SEARCH
Any of these
None of these
join the cause
Section - All Sections -
Join the Cause
One click to say you want HONESTY in
SEARCH
government.
Joomla Search by AceSearch
corruption reports
Sexual Misconduct
Criminal Acts
Perjury
Search All Reports
U.S. Senators
U.S. Congressmen
Governors
Mayors
Judges
Law Enforcement
resources
Web Links
Terms of Use
Site Map
About Us
10 minutes a day
latest news
support center
Fax: 770-578-1057
Email: bill@lawlessamerica.com
Website: www.lawlessamerica.com
tweet button
Tweet
login
Username
Password
Remember me
LOGIN
Forgot login?
legal notice
Site Map
Judicial Corruption is Our fundamental rights Misconduct is Abuse, Dishonesty, Government Dishonesty is Bad.
rampant. Our rights to a fair have been taken away by everywhere. Dishonesty Corruption. It's all We must find honest people
trial are a myth. Many a government of wrongs. abounds. Perjury,
trial are a myth. Many a government of wrongs. abounds. Perjury, common with Police and and make them accountable
judges are totally corrupt. Stolen by corruption. subornation of perjury, Law Enforcement. to We the People.
READ all about it. READ all about it. corruption! READ all about it. READ all about it.
READ all about it.
Headlines:
Advanced Search
Return results if all of the following conditions are met:
search... SEARCH
SEARCH RESET
Category:
search reports
Accused Party:
All Categories
Accused Party Title:
SEARCH
Advanced Search
Court or Office:
Accused County:
join the cause
City of Complaint:
Join the Cause
County of Complaint:
One click to say you want HONESTY in
government.
State of Complaint:
Types of Misconduct:
Abuse
Bias corruption reports
Bribery
Brutality
Civil Rights Violation Sexual Misconduct
Conflict of Interest
Conspiracy to Defraud Criminal Acts
Conspiracy
Corruption Perjury
Criminal Acts
Cronyism
Search All Reports
Dishonesty U.S. Senators
Drugs
DUI-DWI U.S. Congressmen
Election Fraud
Embezzlement Governors
Ethics
Extortion Mayors
Failure to Report Crimes to Law Enforcement Authorities
False Statements to State Judges
False Swearing
Fraud Law Enforcement
Incompetence
Honest Services Fraud
Influence Peddling
Mail Fraud
Obstruction of Justice There are 1749 listings and 18 categories in our
Patronage website
Pedophilia
Perjury
Prejudice
Complaint Details: resources
Complainant:
Web Links
Site Map
Complainant State:
About Us
Featured: Any
SEARCH RESET
10 minutes a day
Spend 10-Minutes a Day helping fix America. Click
for projects.
latest news
support center
Fax: 770-578-1057
Email: bill@lawlessamerica.com
Website: www.lawlessamerica.com
tweet button
Tweet
login
Username
Password
Remember me
LOGIN
Forgot login?
legal notice
Site Map
Headlines:
Advanced Search
Results 1 - 20 of 500
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 search... SEARCH
Ackerman, Gary
Category: Official - Elected search reports
Accused Party Type Official - Elected Accused Party Title Congressman Court or Office U.S. House of Representatives State of
Complaint New York
Search...
All Categories
Adams, Sandy
Category: Official - Elected SEARCH
Advanced Search
Accused Party Type Official - Elected Accused Party Title Congressman Court or Office U.S. House of Representatives State of
Complaint Florida
Accused Party Type Official - Elected Accused Party Title Congressman Court or Office U.S. House of Representatives State of Join the Cause
Complaint Alabama
One click to say you want HONESTY in
government.
Akin, Todd
Category: Official - Elected
Accused Party Type Official - Elected Accused Party Title U.S. Congressman Court or Office U.S. House of Representatives State
of Complaint Missouri corruption reports
Accused Party Type Official - Elected Accused Party Title Congressman Court or Office U.S. House of Representatives State of
Complaint New Jersey
resources
Armey, Dick
Category: Official - Elected
Web Links
Accused Party Type Official - Elected Accused Party Title Congressman Court or Office U.S. Huse of Representatives State of
Complaint Texas Terms of Use
Site Map
Austria, Steve
Category: Official - Elected About Us
Accused Party Type Official - Elected Accused Party Title Congressman Court or Office U.S. House of Representatives State of
Complaint Ohio
10 minutes a day
Baca, Joe
Category: Official - Elected
Spend 10-Minutes a Day helping fix America. Click
Accused Party Type Official - Elected Accused Party Title Congressman Court or Office U.S. House of Representatives State of for projects.
Complaint California
Accused Party Type Official - Elected Accused Party Title Congressman Court or Office U.S. House of Representatives State of
Windsor Banned from Filing a Lawsuit
Complaint Minnesota
Anywhere in America
15.07.11
Bachus, Spencer
Category: Official - Elected Federal Judge orders that Parties No
Longer have Constitutional Rights to
Accused Party Type Official - Elected Accused Party Title Congressman Court or Office U.S. House of Representatives State of Due Process
Complaint Alabama 07.07.11
Accused Party Type Official - Elected Accused Party Title Congressman Court or Office U.S. House of Representatives State of support center
Complaint Georgia
Fax: 770-578-1057
Email: bill@lawlessamerica.com
Barrow, John Website: www.lawlessamerica.com
Category: Official - Elected
Accused Party Type Official - Elected Accused Party Title Congressman Court or Office U.S. House of Representatives State of
Complaint Georgia
tweet button
Bartlett, Roscoe
Category: Official - Elected Tweet
Accused Party Type Official - Elected Accused Party Title Congressman Court or Office U.S. House of Representatives State of
Complaint Maryland
login
Barton, Joe
Category: Official - Elected
Username
Accused Party Type Official - Elected Accused Party Title Congressman Court or Office U.S. House of Representatives State of
Complaint Texas
Password
Bass, Charles
Category: Official - Elected Remember me
Accused Party Type Official - Elected Accused Party Title Congressman Court or Office U.S. House of Representatives State of LOGIN
Complaint New Hampshire
Forgot login?
legal notice
Site Map
Headlines:
Advanced Search
Results 1 - 20 of 20
search... SEARCH
Adams, Sam
Category: Official - Elected
Accused Party Type Official - Elected Accused Party Title Mayor Court or Office City of Portland Oregon State of search reports
Complaint Oregon
Search...
Adams, Tom
Category: Official - Elected All Categories
Accused Party Type Official - Elected Accused Party Title Mayor Court or Office City of Green Oaks Illinois State of SEARCH
Complaint Illinois Advanced Search
Becker, Gary
Category: Official - Elected join the cause
Accused Party Type Official - Elected Accused Party Title Mayor Court or Office City of Racine Wisconsin State of
Complaint Wisconsin
Join the Cause
Accused Party Type Official - Elected Accused Party Title Mayor Court or Office City of Columbus New Mexico State of
Complaint New Mexico
corruption reports
Fennell, Richard
Category: Official - Elected
Sexual Misconduct
Accused Party Type Official - Elected Accused Party Title Mayor Court or Office City of Braswell State of
Complaint Georgia Criminal Acts
Perjury
Garcia-Von Borstel, Octavio Search All Reports
Category: Official - Elected
U.S. Senators
Accused Party Type Official - Elected Accused Party Title Mayor Court or Office City of Nogales Arizona State of
Complaint Arizona U.S. Congressmen
Governors
Giordano, Philip A. Mayors
Category: Official - Elected
Judges
Accused Party Type Official - Elected Accused Party Title Mayor Court or Office City of Waterbury State of
Complaint Connecticut Law Enforcement
Giuliani, Rudy
Category: Official - Elected
There are 1749 listings and 18 categories in our
Accused Party Type Official - Elected Accused Party Title Mayor Court or Office City of New York State of Complaint New website
York
Accused Party Type Official - Elected Accused Party Title Mayor Court or Office City of Oswego State of Complaint New
Web Links
York
Terms of Use
Jackson, John
Site Map
Category: Official - Elected
Accused Party Type Official - Elected Accused Party Title Mayor Court or Office City of White Hall State of About Us
Complaint Alabama
Kauffman, Allen D.
Category: Official - Elected
10 minutes a day
Accused Party Type Official - Elected Accused Party Title Mayor Court or Office City of Collins Missouri State of
Spend 10-Minutes a Day helping fix America. Click
Complaint Missouri
for projects.
Kilpatrick, Kwame
Category: Official - Elected
latest news
Accused Party Type Official - Elected Accused Party Title Mayor Court or Office City of Detroit State of
Complaint Michigan
Windsor Banned from Filing a Lawsuit
Anywhere in America
Lantigua, William 15.07.11
Accused Party Type Official - Elected Accused Party Title Mayor Court or Office City of Lawrence State of Federal Judge orders that Parties No
Complaint Massachusetts Longer have Constitutional Rights to
Due Process
07.07.11
Newsom, Gavin
2 Hearings set on Same Day as Federal
Category: Official - Elected
Judges try to "Steal Money" and avoid
Accused Party Type Official - Elected Accused Party Title Mayor Court or Office City of San Francisco State of Jail
07.07.11
Complaint California
Accused Party Type Official - Elected Accused Party Title Mayor Court or Office City of Clarkfield Minnesota State of
Complaint Minnesota Windsor succeeds in establishing
Federal Precedent Vital to Pro Se
Parties
03.07.11
Springer, Jerry
Category: Official - Elected
Accused Party Type Official - Elected Accused Party Title Mayor Court or Office City of Cincinnati Ohio State of
Complaint Ohio support center
Villaraigosa, Antonio
Category: Official - Elected tweet button
Accused Party Type Official - Elected Accused Party Title Mayor Court or Office City of Los Angeles State of
Complaint California Tweet
West, Jim
Category: Official - Elected login
Accused Party Type Official - Elected Accused Party Title Mayor Court or Office City of Spokane Washington State of
Complaint Washington
Username
Willias, Arnell
Password
Category: Official - Elected
Accused Party Type Official - Elected Accused Party Title Mayor Court or Office City of Helena State of
Complaint Arkansas Remember me
LOGIN
legal notice
Site Map
Headlines:
We are regularly out on the Web. When we find a great site we list it. Advanced Search
search... SEARCH
corruption reports
Sexual Misconduct
Criminal Acts
Perjury
Search All Reports
U.S. Senators
U.S. Congressmen
Governors
Mayors
Judges
Law Enforcement
resources
Web Links
Terms of Use
Site Map
About Us
10 minutes a day
Spend 10-Minutes a Day helping fix America. Click
for projects.
latest news
support center
Fax: 770-578-1057
Email: bill@lawlessamerica.com
Website: www.lawlessamerica.com
tweet button
Tweet
facebook share
Share on facebook
find us on facebook
login
Username
Password
Remember me
LOGIN
Forgot login?
legal notice
I, William M. Windsor, am not an attorney. This
website expresses my OPINIONS. This website does
not provide legal advice. This website is to expose
corruption in our government and the federal
judiciary. Please read our Legal Notice and Terms.
Site Map
Judicial Corruption is Our fundamental rights Misconduct is Abuse, Dishonesty, Government Dishonesty is Bad.
rampant. Our rights to a fair have been taken away by everywhere. Dishonesty Corruption. It's all We must find honest people
trial are a myth. Many a government of wrongs. abounds. Perjury, common with Police and and make them accountable
judges are totally corrupt. Stolen by corruption. subornation of perjury, Law Enforcement. to We the People.
READ all about it. READ all about it. corruption! READ all about it. READ all about it.
READ all about it.
Headlines:
search... SEARCH
The goal of this site is to spread the word about corruption
and injustice in the court system and in government.
By using this site, you signify your assent to these terms of search reports
use. If you do not agree to these terms of use, please do not
use the site. Search...
All Categories
I reserve the right, at my discretion, to change, modify, add, or remove portions of these SEARCH
terms at any time and without prior notice. Please check these terms periodically for Advanced Search
changes. Your continued use of this site following the posting of changes to these terms
will constitute your acceptance of those changes.
join the cause
Not Legal Advice
Join the Cause
The information contained on this site is offered as a service to the public does not
One click to say you want HONESTY in
constitute legal advice. I do not warrant or guarantee the accuracy, completeness, government.
This website is purely a public resource of general information (intended, but not promised
Sexual Misconduct
or guaranteed to be correct, complete, or up-to-date) and is not intended be a source of
Criminal Acts
legal advice. Do not rely on information at this site or others in place of the advice of
Perjury
competent counsel. The webmaster of this site will gladly remove any link from this site
Search All Reports
upon request from the linked entity. This web site is not sponsored or associated with any
U.S. Senators
particular linked entity unless specifically stated. The existence of any particular link is
U.S. Congressmen
simply intended to imply potential interest to the reader, inclusion of a link should not be
Governors
construed as an endorsement. I am not responsible for the content of external sites.
Mayors
FAIR USE NOTICE Judges
Law Enforcement
This site may contain some copyrighted material the use of which has not always been
specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in
our efforts to advance understanding of legal and judicial reform that is needed today in There are 1749 listings and 18 categories in our
the United States. Changes that we hope are affecting such issues as the Constitutional website
Rights, Substantive & Procedural Due Process, a fair and honest judicial system both
federal and state. When we include the full text of an article originally posted on the
resources
Internet rather than a simple link, it is because links frequently go "bad", that is the links
change over time or the web page is removed after a brief period. We believe this Web Links
constitutes a "fair use" of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of
Terms of Use
the USA Copyright Law (see below). In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this
Site Map
material is distributed on this web site without profit to those who have expressed a prior
general interest in receiving similar information for research and education purposes. If About Us
you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go
beyond "fair use", you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. Victims-of-Law,
Inc. does not give permission for credit citation of other sources. 10 minutes a day
Spend 10-Minutes a Day helping fix America. Click
TITLE 17 U.S.C. SECTION 107
for projects.
Copyright and Fair Use. Congress has identified four nonexclusive factors as "especially
relevant" in determining fair use. Id. The Copyright Act provides: The fair use of a latest news
copyrighted work . . . for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching,
scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright. In determining whether the Windsor Banned from Filing a Lawsuit
Anywhere in America
use made of a work in any particular case is a fair use the factors to be considered shall 15.07.11
include - (1) the purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of a
commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes; (2) the nature of the Federal Judge orders that Parties No
Longer have Constitutional Rights to
copyrighted work; (3) the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the Due Process
07.07.11
copyrighted work as a whole; and (4) the effect of the use upon the potential market for or
2 Hearings set on Same Day as Federal
value of the copyrighted work. 17 U.S.C. @ 107. Judges try to "Steal Money" and avoid
Jail
07.07.11
COPYRIGHTED MATERIAL
Criminal Charges filed against Federal
If I have inadvertently used copyrighted material without giving credit, please let me know Judges and Clerks in Atlanta
06.07.11
so I may give credit where credit is due or; if requested, remove such material.
Windsor succeeds in establishing
Federal Precedent Vital to Pro Se
Parties
03.07.11
Last Updated on Friday, 03 June 2011 12:37
Fax: 770-578-1057
Email: bill@lawlessamerica.com
Website: www.lawlessamerica.com
tweet button
Tweet
facebook share
Share on facebook
find us on facebook
login
Username
Password
Remember me
LOGIN
Forgot login?
legal notice
I, William M. Windsor, am not an attorney. This
website expresses my OPINIONS. This website does
not provide legal advice. This website is to expose
corruption in our government and the federal
judiciary. Please read our Legal Notice and Terms.
Site Map
Judicial Corruption is Our fundamental rights Misconduct is Abuse, Dishonesty, Government Dishonesty is Bad.
rampant. Our rights to a fair have been taken away by everywhere. Dishonesty Corruption. It's all We must find honest people
trial are a myth. Many a government of wrongs. abounds. Perjury, common with Police and and make them accountable
judges are totally corrupt. Stolen by corruption. subornation of perjury, Law Enforcement. to We the People.
READ all about it. READ all about it. corruption! READ all about it. READ all about it.
READ all about it.
Headlines:
Advanced Search
Home
News search... SEARCH
Attorney Dishonesty, Misconduct, and Corruption
News Reports
Corrupt Attorney Threatens William M. Windsor
California Attorney Confesses Crime in Open Court--Judge Fails to Take Notice search reports
Former Georgia Candidate for U.S. Congress Disbarred, Indicted, and More
District of Columbia Attorney and Investigators Indicted for Alleged Roles in Scheme to Obstruct Justice in Criminal
Case Search...
Louisiana Attorneys seek Retrial for suspected Serial Killer Derrick Todd Lee due to Prosecutorial Misconduct All Categories
San Diego California District Attorney Bonnie Dumanis fails to prosecute Elected Officials despite Promises
SEARCH
Attorney Dishonesty, Misconduct, and Corruption -- Latest News Reports - 38 Reports for April 18, 2011
Advanced Search
Department of Justice takes action to Suspend or Disbar 401 Immigration Attorneys
Indiana Prosecutor resigns for encouraging Fake Attack on Wisconsin Governor
Professional Misconduct Complaints
Violation #1 - Professional Misconduct of Attorneys - Ex Parte Communications join the cause
Violation #2 - Professional Misconduct of Attorneys - Presenting False Evidence about Manoj Makharia
Violation #3 - Professional Misconduct of Attorneys - Concealing Windsor's Fax of July 28, 2005
Violation #4 - Professional Misconduct of Attorneys - Concealing Windsor's Fax of August 10, 2005
Join the Cause
Violation #5 - Professional Misconduct of Attorneys - Counseled Client to Engage in Criminal Conduct
One click to say you want HONESTY in
Violation #6 - Professional Misconduct of Attorneys - Subornation of Perjury
government.
Violation #7 - Professional Misconduct of Attorneys - Subornation of Perjury and False Sworn Pleadings 1
Violation #8 - Professional Misconduct of Attorneys - Subornation of Perjury and False Sworn Pleadings 2
Professional Misconduct Complaint Against Carl Hugo Anderson of Hawkins Parnell Thackston Young
Battling Corruption
corruption reports
Affiliates
Affiliates
Battling Government Corruption and Dishonesty Sexual Misconduct
HELP FIGHT Dishonesty in Government
Criminal Acts
William M. Windsor recovers from Eye Surgery -- Ready to Renew Fight against Government Corruption
Contract with Citizens of the United States Perjury
First Candidate Commits to Sign Honesty Contract with the Citizens of the United States Search All Reports
Elected and Appointed Government Employees asked to Sign Honesty Contract with the Citizens of the United
States
U.S. Senators
Contract with the Citizens of the United States U.S. Congressmen
GRIP - Government Reform & Integrity Platform
Governors
Time to SAVE America - Time to Get a GRIP
Government Corruption Movement is MOVING Mayors
Initiatives Judges
Ideas for State Legislation to deal with Judicial and Government Dishonesty and Corruption
The Plan for Government Reform & Integrity
Law Enforcement
10-Minutes a Day to Fix America
Report all Dishonest and Corrupt Government "Officials"
Government Corruption: I Have a Plan
Government Corruption Channel Established on YouTube There are 1749 listings and 18 categories in our
website
Facebook May Be A Key to Combatting Government Corruption
Some Ideas for Fixing the Judicial Corruption Problem
Lawless America Online TV Show
Government Corruption Crisis TV Show - Watch Right Here resources
Government Corruption Crisis Online TV Show -- Sunday April 17, 2011 - 5-7 pm EDT
Government Corruption Crisis Online TV Show -- Sunday April 3, 2011 - 5-7 pm EDT
Web Links
Elena Sassower of Center for Judicial Accountability -- Lawless America TV, Sunday 5-7 pm EDT
Elena Sassower of Center for Judicial Accountability -- Lawless America TV, Sunday March 27, 2011 - 5-7 pm EDT
Terms of Use
Government Corruption Crisis Conference This Sunday
Government Corruption Crisis Online TV Show Tonight Site Map
Government Corruption Crisis Conference Report -- Next Steps
Sunday 5 to 7 pm EST -- Government Corruption Crisis Conference -- Watch Right Here! About Us
Government Corruption Crisis Conference
Legal Options
Fulton County Georgia Grand Jury Effort is Working - Grand Jury will investigate 11 Corrupt Federal Judges
How to Fight Judicial Corruption 10 minutes a day
Grand Juries are an Important Way to Battle Government Corruption
42 U.S.C. 1983 allows You to sue for Violation of Your Rights Spend 10-Minutes a Day helping fix America. Click
Criminal Charges against Corrupt Government Officials: Perjury - Violation of 18 U.S.C. 1621 for projects.
Pledge to Honesty in Government
Take the Pledge - Simply state You want Honesty in Government
Civil Liberties Violations
latest news
Civil Liberties
With OBL Dead, Are We Gonna Get Our Rights Back?
Congressional Dishonesty and Corruption Windsor Banned from Filing a Lawsuit
News Reports Anywhere in America
15.07.11
Another Weiner Pervert EXPOSED in Congress
115 U.S. Congress Members involved in Scandals and Corruption
U.S. Senator John Ensign from Nevada announces Resignation amid Ethics Investigation Federal Judge orders that Parties No
Every Member of House and Senate asked to Sign Honesty Contract with the Citizens of the United States Longer have Constitutional Rights to
Due Process
Who is this Man...and Why is he Smiling? 07.07.11
U.S. Congressman Christopher Lee Resigns After he sends Shirtless Photo to Woman on Craigslist
Constitutional Rights Problems 2 Hearings set on Same Day as Federal
Judges try to "Steal Money" and avoid
News Reports
Jail
Plan presented to reform Alabama Constitution 07.07.11
Supreme Court Landmark Decision means Constitution is Void
Supreme Court Justice Thomas signals his vote on Landmark Decision on the Constitution Criminal Charges filed against Federal
Judges and Clerks in Atlanta
Supreme Court to issue Landmark Decision on the Constitution 06.07.11
Corporate Dishonesty and Corruption
News Reports
Billions of Dollars in Medicare and Health Care Fraud Windsor succeeds in establishing
Federal Precedent Vital to Pro Se
What do Verizon, Johnson & Johnson, Goldman Sachs, CVS, and Taylor Bean and Whitaker have in common? Parties
Former Chairman of Taylor, Bean & Whitaker Convicted for $2.9 Billion Fraud Scheme That Contributed to the 03.07.11
Judicial Corruption is Our fundamental rights Misconduct is Abuse, Dishonesty, Government Dishonesty is Bad.
rampant. Our rights to a fair have been taken away by everywhere. Dishonesty Corruption. It's all We must find honest people
trial are a myth. Many a government of wrongs. abounds. Perjury, common with Police and and make them accountable
judges are totally corrupt. Stolen by corruption. subornation of perjury, Law Enforcement. to We the People.
READ all about it. READ all about it. corruption! READ all about it. READ all about it.
READ all about it.
Headlines:
about us search
Advanced Search
About William M. Windsor search... SEARCH
Saturday, 16 October 2010 16:53 William M. Windsor
My retirement didn't last long. I have owned and/or operated many magazines and trade join the cause
shows, travel businesses, retail stores, manufacturing companies, printing company,
Join the Cause
typesetting business, advertising agency, marketing companies, convention services
businesses, souvenir and gift businesses, tourist attractions, resort businesses, music One click to say you want HONESTY in
government.
businesses, computer software company, a consulting company, a food franchise, internet
businesses, and more. I have written numerous articles, books, training programs, and
manuals. In have spoken at conferences and trade shows across North America and in
corruption reports
Europe, Australia, and China.
Sexual Misconduct
From 1992 to 1996, I was President of Advanstar Expositions, a company owned at the
Criminal Acts
time by Goldman Sachs. Advanstar was one of the largest producers of trade shows and
Perjury
conferences in the world. From 1996 to 2001, I was CEO of 1st Communications, a
Search All Reports
company owned by Bain Capital, Triumph Capital Group, and me. 1st Communications
U.S. Senators
made a series of multi-million dollar acquisitions to build one of the largest trade show
U.S. Congressmen
businesses -- the largest in terms of the number of annual events. 1st Communications also
Governors
developed one of the first online job and resume businesses using a network of over 1,000
Mayors
web sites. That business was sold to The Washington Post in 2001, and I "retired" to
Judges
Atlanta, Georgia to be near grandchildren-to-be. I have been married to Barbara for 39
Law Enforcement
years; we have two wonderful children, and three incredible granddaughters.
I discovered corruption in the federal courts in Atlanta, Georgia, and I will not stop until
these judges are exposed for the world to see. My friends will tell you that I am as There are 1749 listings and 18 categories in our
website
tenacious as they come. I will spend the rest of my life on this if necessary.
I am not an attorney. I was accepted to law school but decided to go into business instead. resources
Over the last five years, I have gotten quite a legal education. At this point, I am confident
that I can do a better job than any attorney would, and I work cheap. Web Links
Terms of Use
Last Updated on Saturday, 23 April 2011 13:41
Site Map
My Story
10 minutes a day
latest news
support center
Fax: 770-578-1057
Email: bill@lawlessamerica.com
Website: www.lawlessamerica.com
tweet button
Tweet
windsor radio
facebook share
Share on facebook
find us on facebook
login
Username
Password
Remember me
LOGIN
Forgot login?
legal notice
Site Map
Judicial Corruption is Our fundamental rights Misconduct is Abuse, Dishonesty, Government Dishonesty is Bad.
rampant. Our rights to a fair have been taken away by everywhere. Dishonesty Corruption. It's all We must find honest people
trial are a myth. Many a government of wrongs. abounds. Perjury, common with Police and and make them accountable
judges are totally corrupt. Stolen by corruption. subornation of perjury, Law Enforcement. to We the People.
READ all about it. READ all about it. corruption! READ all about it. READ all about it.
READ all about it.
Headlines:
search
Advanced Search
The Thrasher has done this so he and his fellow federal judges have an illegal
means to shield themselves from prosecution, indictment, arrest, conviction,
10 minutes a day
imprisonment, disgrace, and impeachment....
Spend 10-Minutes a Day helping fix America. Click
for projects.
latest news
Like 7 likes. Sign Up to see what your friends like.
JUL try to "Steal Money" and avoid Jail Federal Judge orders that Parties No
Longer have Constitutional Rights to
Written by Admin
Due Process
07.07.11
Fax: 770-578-1057
Email: bill@lawlessamerica.com
Like One like. Sign Up to see what your friends like.
Website: www.lawlessamerica.com
My report has been filed and has been referred to the find us on facebook
Public Corruption Unit.
login
On July 1, 2011, United States District Court Judge for No account yet? Register
the Northern District of Georgia issued three (3)
orders recognizing that a pro se party has the right to
sign his or her own 28 U.S.C. 144 Certificate when legal notice
filing a motion to recuse a federal judge.
I, William M. Windsor, am not an attorney. This
website expresses my OPINIONS. This website does
This is important because the many corrupt federal judges use the argument not provide legal advice. This website is to expose
corruption in our government and the federal
that a pro se partry can't file a motion to disqualify under 28 U.S.C. 144
judiciary. Please read our Legal Notice and Terms.
because they aren't an attorney and can't file the 28 U.S.C. 144 Certificate by an
Site Map
attorney that the motion was filed in good faith.
Read the full story Add new comment
William M. Windsor will host the meeting unless he is sent to jail by corrupt
Judge William S. Duffey...
People who I spoke with indicated that the judge is a 10 on a 1-to-10 scale.
On June 29, 2011 just after 5:00 pm, the docket in the case shows "TRANSFER"
dated June 28, 2011.
We have an opportunity to get a court ruling here in Georgia that will pave the
way for federal judges to be prosecuted for their corrupt criminal acts!
It will come as no surprise that a whole new level of scumbagness has hit in
Atlanta in an effort to stop me from exposing all the serial crooks masquerading
as federal judges.
But they've made it clear they'd appreciate it if he'd go away. And soon.
More Articles...
1. William Windsor is a Victim of Racketeering in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia
2. Court Records Scam gets Scammier in Georgia Federal Court
3. Latest from Bill Windsor - Death Threats, Grand Jury, Suing Judges, and More
4. Family Court Judge Accused Of Domestic Violence
5. IRS Agent gets Three Years in Prison for filing False Tax Returns
6. Federal Judge Richard J. Leon covers up Corruption
7. Sue the Judges and Get Proof of their Crimes
8. Senator John Edwards to face Criminal Charges
9. Corrupt Attorney Threatens William M. Windsor
10. How to Fight Judicial Corruption
11. Racketeering and Corrupt Organization Lawsuit filed against 7 Federal Judges and 9 Judicial Employees
12. Police Officer molested at least Five Children at School
13. Windsor seeks Important Precedent for All Pro Se Parties
14. U.S. Congressman gets 13 years on Corruption Conviction
15. Windsor denied access to his own Court Records
16. Tulsa Oklahoma Police Scandal -- 11 Named - 32 People Freed from Prison
17. New Mexico Judge indicted on Four Counts of Bribery
18. William M. Windsor Targeted for Assassination by U.S. Government
19. Windsor seeks Government Protection from U.S. Marshals
20. Public Guardian's office looting estates--with a little help from the Judge
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Page 1 of 7
Judicial Corruption is Our fundamental rights Misconduct is Abuse, Dishonesty, Government Dishonesty is Bad.
rampant. Our rights to a fair have been taken away by everywhere. Dishonesty Corruption. It's all We must find honest people
trial are a myth. Many a government of wrongs. abounds. Perjury, common with Police and and make them accountable
judges are totally corrupt. Stolen by corruption. subornation of perjury, Law Enforcement. to We the People.
READ all about it. READ all about it. corruption! READ all about it. READ all about it.
READ all about it.
Get a GRIP America Affiliates: Lawless America | Center for Judicial Accountability | Supreme Abuse | Toxic Justice | Outlaw Judges | Judge William S. Duffey | Judge Evans Complaint | Power Corrupts Again | Judge
Kennedy Resign | Wake Up America | Conservative Patriot | Minnesota 10th Judicial District Free Press | NASGA - National Association to Stop Guardian Abuse |
Copyright 2011 Lawless America. All Rights Reserved. Designed by JoomlArt.com.
Joomla! is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL License.
Lawless America
WE'VE GOTTA FIX THIS! HOME NEWS CORRUPTION REPORTS BATTLING CORRUPTION AFFILIATES US YOU
Headlines:
search
Categories
Advanced Search
0-9 A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
search... SEARCH
Search...
Financial - Bankruptcy (2) Government (47)
All Categories
Bend Oregon Police City of Dearborn Michigan
SEARCH
Sherrod, Shirley District of Columbia
Advanced Search
District of Columbia
Alarcon, Arthur
Aldisert, Ruggero
corruption reports
Judicial Employees (9) Law Enforcement (89)
Atkins, Jeffrey Adams, Tommy Sexual Misconduct
Bickell, Danny Ballman, Clay Criminal Acts
Fossum, Erik Berkeley County Sheriff's Department Perjury
Search All Reports
Legal System (2) Military (22)
Matestec, Fred Blake, Carolyn
U.S. Senators
State of Florida Cockerham, John U.S. Congressmen
Cockerham, Melissa Governors
Mayors
Official - Appointed (29) Official - Elected (792)
Judges
Atchison, John David Roy Abercrombie, Neil
Law Enforcement
Berger, Sandy Ackerman, Gary
Parental Rights (2) Political (58) There are 1749 listings and 18 categories in our
Child Protection Services Aiken, Steve website
Balfour, E. Ozwald
resources
Vote (2)
Coan, Kevin Web Links
Webb-Washington, LaVern
Terms of Use
No records found
About Us
10 minutes a day
Spend 10-Minutes a Day helping fix America. Click
for projects.
latest news
support center
Fax: 770-578-1057
Email: bill@lawlessamerica.com
Website: www.lawlessamerica.com
tweet button
Tweet
login
Username
Password
Remember me
LOGIN
Forgot login?
legal notice
Site Map
Headlines:
Advanced Search
search... SEARCH
search reports
Battling Corruption and Dishonesty in Government
Search...
All Categories
Affiliates ( 1 Article )
SEARCH
Affiliates -- An important part of the effort to battle corruption is to get all Advanced Search
organizations, websites, bloggers, and others who are passionate about this problem to
affiliate with us.
join the cause
Battling Government Corruption and Dishonesty ( 2 Articles )
Battling Government Corruption and Dishonesty -- Specific plans have been Join the Cause
formulated for attacking government corruption and dishonesty.
One click to say you want HONESTY in
Contract with Citizens of the United States ( 3 Articles ) government.
Contract with Citizens of the United States -- Every government official and
candidate for elected office is asked to sign this Contract committing to always tell the
truth and protect our fundamental rights pursuant to the Constitution and Bill of corruption reports
Rights.
Sexual Misconduct
GRIP - Government Reform & Integrity Platform ( 2 Articles )
Criminal Acts
GRIP -- Government Reform & Integrity Platform -- affiliation of all groups and people Perjury
seeking honesty in government and support of the fundamental rights that we are Search All Reports
supposed to have pursuant to the Constitution and Bill of Rights.
U.S. Senators
Initiatives ( 8 Articles ) U.S. Congressmen
Initiatives -- Specific programs developed by GRIP to battle dishonesty and corruption Governors
in government. Mayors
Judges
Lawless America Online TV Show ( 10 Articles )
Law Enforcement
Lawless America Online TV Show -- Lawless America is on the air every Sunday
from 5-7 pm Eastern Time.
Legal Options ( 5 Articles ) There are 1749 listings and 18 categories in our
website
Legal Options -- There are a variety of legal options for battling corruption -- grand
juries, lawsuits, misconduct reports, and more.
resources
Pledge to Honesty in Government ( 1 Article )
Web Links
Pledge to Honesty in Government -- All Americans are asked to join the cause by
saying "I support honesty uin government and the fundamental rights pursuant to the Terms of Use
Constitution and Bill of Rights." Make the Pledge by joining the cause on Facebook or
by signing a Petition. Site Map
About Us
10 minutes a day
Spend 10-Minutes a Day helping fix America. Click
for projects.
latest news
support center
Fax: 770-578-1057
Email: bill@lawlessamerica.com
Website: www.lawlessamerica.com
tweet button
Tweet
login
Username
Password
Remember me
LOGIN
Forgot login?
legal notice
Site Map
Headlines:
Advanced Search
search reports
Search...
All Categories
SEARCH
Get a GRIP America Affiliates: Lawless America | Center for Judicial Accountability |
Advanced Search
Supreme Abuse | Toxic Justice | Outlaw Judges | Judge William S. Duffey | Judge Evans
Complaint | Power Corrupts Again | Judge Kennedy Resign | Wake Up America |
Conservative Patriot | Minnesota 10th Judicial District Free Press | NASGA - National join the cause
Association to Stop Guardian Abuse |
Join the Cause
One click to say you want HONESTY in
government.
Like 7 likes. Sign Up to see what your friends like. corruption reports
Sexual Misconduct
Criminal Acts
Perjury
Search All Reports
U.S. Senators
U.S. Congressmen
Governors
Mayors
Judges
Law Enforcement
resources
Web Links
Terms of Use
Site Map
About Us
10 minutes a day
Spend 10-Minutes a Day helping fix America. Click
for projects.
latest news
support center
Fax: 770-578-1057
Email: bill@lawlessamerica.com
Website: www.lawlessamerica.com
tweet button
Tweet
login
Username
Password
Remember me
LOGIN
Forgot login?
legal notice
Site Map
Headlines:
Advanced Search
search... SEARCH
How to use this Site -- Review this so you can take advantage of the many features of Web Links
this website.
Terms of Use
Site Map
About Us
10 minutes a day
latest news
support center
Fax: 770-578-1057
Email: bill@lawlessamerica.com
Website: www.lawlessamerica.com
tweet button
Tweet
login
Username
Password
Remember me
LOGIN
Forgot login?
legal notice
Site Map
Judicial Corruption is Our fundamental rights Misconduct is Abuse, Dishonesty, Government Dishonesty is Bad.
rampant. Our rights to a fair have been taken away by everywhere. Dishonesty Corruption. It's all We must find honest people
trial are a myth. Many a government of wrongs. abounds. Perjury,
trial are a myth. Many a government of wrongs. abounds. Perjury, common with Police and and make them accountable
judges are totally corrupt. Stolen by corruption. subornation of perjury, Law Enforcement. to We the People.
READ all about it. READ all about it. corruption! READ all about it. READ all about it.
READ all about it.
Headlines:
login search
Advanced Search
Username
search... SEARCH
Password
search reports
Remember me
LOGIN
Search...
Forgot login?
All Categories
No account yet? Register
SEARCH
Advanced Search
corruption reports
Sexual Misconduct
Criminal Acts
Perjury
Search All Reports
U.S. Senators
U.S. Congressmen
Governors
Mayors
Judges
Law Enforcement
resources
Web Links
Terms of Use
Site Map
About Us
10 minutes a day
Spend 10-Minutes a Day helping fix America. Click
for projects.
latest news
support center
Fax: 770-578-1057
Email: bill@lawlessamerica.com
Website: www.lawlessamerica.com
tweet button
Tweet
facebook share
Share on facebook
find us on facebook
login
Username
Password
Remember me
LOGIN
Forgot login?
legal notice
I, William M. Windsor, am not an attorney. This
website expresses my OPINIONS. This website does
not provide legal advice. This website is to expose
corruption in our government and the federal
judiciary. Please read our Legal Notice and Terms.
Site Map
Judicial Corruption is Our fundamental rights Misconduct is Abuse, Dishonesty, Government Dishonesty is Bad.
rampant. Our rights to a fair have been taken away by everywhere. Dishonesty Corruption. It's all We must find honest people
trial are a myth. Many a government of wrongs. abounds. Perjury, common with Police and and make them accountable
judges are totally corrupt. Stolen by corruption. subornation of perjury, Law Enforcement. to We the People.
READ all about it. READ all about it. corruption! READ all about it. READ all about it.
READ all about it.
Headlines:
Thrash (aka The Thrasher) issued multiple orders denying the Join the Cause
rights of a litigant to pursue his legal claims in court, file One click to say you want HONESTY in
motions, call witnesses to give testimony, and much more. government.
The Thrasher has scheduled a hearing for July 15, 2011 at 2:00 pm at which those in
attendance will be able to see his evil at work. I absolutely promise you a hearing filled There are 1749 listings and 18 categories in our
website
with verbal and documentary fireworks. Please come.
About Us
1-11-CV-01922-TWT-25-Order-Granting-Protective-Order-2011-06-17
1-11-CV-01922-TWT-29-Order-Granting-28-USC-144-2011-06-22
10 minutes a day
1-11-CV-01922-TWT-39-Order-Denying-Motion-for-Recusal-2011-07-01
Spend 10-Minutes a Day helping fix America. Click
for projects.
1-11-CV-01922-TWT-41-Order-denying-Filing-2011-07-07
1-11-CV-01922-TWT-42-Order-denying-Filing-2011-07-07
latest news
William M. Windsor
Windsor Banned from Filing a Lawsuit
Anywhere in America
Last Updated on Thursday, 07 July 2011 23:42 15.07.11
ADD COMMENT
Like 7 likes. Sign Up to see what your friends like. Federal Judge orders that Parties No
Name Longer have Constitutional Rights to
Due Process
(required) 07.07.11
support center
Refresh
Fax: 770-578-1057
Email: bill@lawlessamerica.com
Send Website: www.lawlessamerica.com
JComments
tweet button
Tweet
login
Username
Password
Remember me
LOGIN
Forgot login?
legal notice
Site Map
Judicial Corruption is Our fundamental rights Misconduct is Abuse, Dishonesty, Government Dishonesty is Bad.
rampant. Our rights to a fair have been taken away by everywhere. Dishonesty Corruption. It's all We must find honest people
trial are a myth. Many a government of wrongs. abounds. Perjury,
trial are a myth. Many a government of wrongs. abounds. Perjury, common with Police and and make them accountable
judges are totally corrupt. Stolen by corruption. subornation of perjury, Law Enforcement. to We the People.
READ all about it. READ all about it. corruption! READ all about it. READ all about it.
READ all about it.
You are here: News Judicial Corruption and Dishonesty News Reports Federal Judge orders that Parties No Longer have Constitutional Rights to Due
Process
Headlines:
I wonder if The Thrasher did this to interfere with our Judicial Corruption Meeting in
Atlanta from noon to 6 pm on the 15th?! corruption reports
Sexual Misconduct
Someone from inside the government fortress told me this would happen last week, so I'm Criminal Acts
not surprised. Perjury
Search All Reports
This new hearing is where The Thrasher will likely enter an order blocking my ability to
U.S. Senators
ever file a lawsuit of any type anywhere in America.
U.S. Congressmen
If you thought the Duffey Hearing sounded interesting, this one will be far more Governors
interesting. I will not be deprived of my Constitutional rights, the rights protected by the Mayors
Bill of Rights, and my most basic fundamental rights as an American. Judges
Law Enforcement
I plan to call both of these judges as fact witnesses, but they will undoubtedly block me
from being able to call any witnesses. That's the way the system works here. Zero rights
for people like me who are smart enough and have guts enough to nail these guys to the There are 1749 listings and 18 categories in our
wall for their crimes. website
They can't risk letting me call witnesses as I will expose all the crimes.
resources
I have asked to have video cameras and news media present. I have asked permission to
broadcast the hearings live online. That would be exciting! Web Links
Terms of Use
More later. It's 5:22 am, and I've been up all night drafting stuff to present to the Clerk for
Site Map
filing at 8:00 am.
About Us
William M. Windsor
Refresh
Criminal Charges filed against Federal
Judges and Clerks in Atlanta
06.07.11
Send
Windsor succeeds in establishing
JComments
Federal Precedent Vital to Pro Se
Parties
03.07.11
support center
Fax: 770-578-1057
Email: bill@lawlessamerica.com
Website: www.lawlessamerica.com
tweet button
Tweet
login
Username
Password
Remember me
LOGIN
Forgot login?
legal notice
Site Map
You are here: News Judicial Corruption and Dishonesty News Reports 2 Hearings set on Same Day as Federal Judges try to "Steal Money" and avoid Jail
Headlines:
I have many reasons to file criminal charges against these people, but I specifically made these efforts today to report obstruction
of justice. corruption reports
Sexual Misconduct
My first call was to the Atlanta Georgia Police Department (404-848-7231) non-emergency Criminal Acts
number. I was told that I needed to call a different number (404-658-7054). Perjury
Search All Reports
I called 404-658-7054, and the officer told me I had reached the wrong precinct. He told
U.S. Senators
me that the Atlanta Police does not have any authority at the federal courthouse, and he
U.S. Congressmen
said I needed to call the U.S. Police at the federal courthouse.
Governors
An online search revealed nothing for the "U.S. Police," so I called the general information Mayors
number at the courthouse (404-215-1660), and a woman in the Clerk's Office said they Judges
didn't have a clue who was responsible for police matters at the courthouse. I asked for Law Enforcement
the number for the U.S. Marshal Service, and I was given 404-730-2709.
I called 404-730-2709, and U.S. Marshal Hines told me that she couldn't help me. She There are 1749 listings and 18 categories in our
told me I had to call the U.S. Attorney's Office at 405-581-6000. website
I called the U.S. Attorney's Office at 404-581-6000, and I was told that the U.S. Attorney's
resources
Office does not accept complaints from the public. I know that is not true, but I accepted
the phone number for the FBI (404-679-9000) that I was given.
Web Links
I called the FBI, and I was connected to the Duty Agent. She was delightful, quite a change Terms of Use
from my experience. I told her the story, and she filed a report. Now we'll see if I get a call Site Map
back from the Public Corruption Unit.
About Us
The latest criminal acts of the federal judges and the employees of the Office of the Clerk of
the Court is that my legal filings never get filed. I send them to the Clerk's Office with a
cover letter listing the documents to be filed, and my courier gets a signed receipt for each. 10 minutes a day
Then the documents disappear. There is no rule or law that enables this. It is simply a Spend 10-Minutes a Day helping fix America. Click
violation of both state and federal criminal statutes regarding Obstruction of Justice. I for projects.
specifically name Judge Orinda D. Evans, Judge William S. Duffey, Judge Thomas
Woodrow Thrash, and Clerk's Anniva Sanders, Joyce White, and Beverly Gutting.
latest news
I print the dockets each day so I can prove what hasn't been filed. I have the cover letters
Windsor Banned from Filing a Lawsuit
and documents presented for filing and the signed and date and time-stamped receipts Anywhere in America
15.07.11
15.07.11
obtained from the folks at Courier Connection. So I have all the proof.
Last Updated on Wednesday, 06 July 2011 11:07 Criminal Charges filed against Federal
Judges and Clerks in Atlanta
COMMENTS 06.07.11
Like 39 likes. Sign Up to see what your friends like.
#3 Kevin Mulvey 2011-07-12 0
15:54 Windsor succeeds in establishing
The entire Government of Law Enforcement & Federal Precedent Vital to Pro Se
Justice went MOB after they took down the Parties
Mafia during that time period. Didn't you 03.07.11
know? Arms & Drugs r-us. Now it's learned
the Just-Us Dept., FBI & DEA have thier paid
informers working as the drug cartel in
Mexico and being trained with our countries
specila ops monies on our own bases. The
ATF Director claims he didn't know, while support center
they were letting all these assault weapons
"Walk" to the Mexican drug cartels. The Just-
Us Dept., FBI, DEA & Military appear to be in Fax: 770-578-1057
bed with the drug cartels. So when does the
collapse and war start? Email: bill@lawlessamerica.com
Website: www.lawlessamerica.com
WorthingtonGate - connects to all of these
TOP CORRUPT Betrayers and cowards of all
time.
http://LibertyAndJusticeUnited.org
Tweet
Password
#1 David Schied 2011-07-07 20:48 0
OMG Bill.....Don't hold your breath for the FBI. That's like waiting for Hell to freeze over. (I know your being
fecicious.)
Remember me
Hey, I'm wondering if you'd like to go with me on a publiic circuit. I think I know someone who might be able to help set
things up. Let me know of your interest. LOGIN
Quote
Forgot login?
ADD COMMENT
legal notice
Name (required)
E-mail (required, but will not display) I, William M. Windsor, am not an attorney. This
website expresses my OPINIONS. This website does
Website not provide legal advice. This website is to expose
corruption in our government and the federal
judiciary. Please read our Legal Notice and Terms.
Site Map
Refresh
Send
JComments
You are here: News Judicial Corruption and Dishonesty News Reports Criminal Charges filed against Federal Judges and Clerks in Atlanta
Headlines:
This is important because the many corrupt federal judges use the
argument that a pro se partry can't file a motion to disqualify under 28 U.S.C. 144 because corruption reports
they aren't an attorney and can't file the 28 U.S.C. 144 Certificate by an attorney that the
motion was filed in good faith. Sexual Misconduct
Criminal Acts
I spent weeks researching this and pulling together every case where an opinion was ever
Perjury
issued, and my documentation bowled Judge Amy Totenberg over so that she had to accept
Search All Reports
it.
U.S. Senators
I will scan the three orders and attach them here along with the three Motions for recusal. U.S. Congressmen
If I were filing a motion for recusal under 28 U.S.C. 144, I would use these cases and Governors
attach the orders showing that Judge Amy accepted the pro se 144 Certificates. Mayors
Judges
This applies only to federal courts, and it applies only to motions for recusal filed at the Law Enforcement
beginning of a proceeding. After a proceeding gets going, only 28 U.S.C. 455 applies.
Judge Amy's order is as corruot as can be in all other respects, but that is a story for
There are 1749 listings and 18 categories in our
another day. website
Order #2 About Us
Order #3
10 minutes a day
William M. Windsor
Spend 10-Minutes a Day helping fix America. Click
Last Updated on Sunday, 03 July 2011 14:06 for projects.
ADD COMMENT
Like 5 likes. Sign Up to see what your friends like.
Name latest news
(required)
E-mail (required, but will not display) Windsor Banned from Filing a Lawsuit
Anywhere in America
15.07.11
15.07.11
Website
Refresh
Windsor succeeds in establishing
Federal Precedent Vital to Pro Se
Parties
03.07.11
Send
JComments
support center
Fax: 770-578-1057
Email: bill@lawlessamerica.com
Website: www.lawlessamerica.com
tweet button
Tweet
login
Username
Password
Remember me
LOGIN
Forgot login?
legal notice
Site Map
Judicial Corruption is Our fundamental rights Misconduct is Abuse, Dishonesty, Government Dishonesty is Bad.
rampant. Our rights to a fair have been taken away by everywhere. Dishonesty
rampant. Our rights to a fair have been taken away by everywhere. Dishonesty Corruption. It's all We must find honest people
trial are a myth. Many a government of wrongs. abounds. Perjury, common with Police and and make them accountable
judges are totally corrupt. Stolen by corruption. subornation of perjury, Law Enforcement. to We the People.
READ all about it. READ all about it. corruption! READ all about it. READ all about it.
READ all about it.
You are here: News Judicial Corruption and Dishonesty News Reports Windsor succeeds in establishing Federal Precedent Vital to Pro Se Parties
Additionally, a 404 Not Found error was encountered while trying to use an ErrorDocument to handle the request.
Headlines:
Advanced Search
Please register to actively participate on the site.
search... SEARCH
login registration
Username Required field | Field visible on your profile | Field not visible on profile | search reports
Information: Point mouse to icon
Security Code: Search...
Password
All Categories
Enter Security Code:
Remember me SEARCH
corruption reports
REGISTER
Required field | Field visible on your profile | Field not visible on profile | Sexual Misconduct
Information: Point mouse to icon
Criminal Acts
Perjury
Search All Reports
U.S. Senators
U.S. Congressmen
Governors
Mayors
Judges
Law Enforcement
resources
Web Links
Terms of Use
Site Map
About Us
10 minutes a day
Spend 10-Minutes a Day helping fix America. Click
for projects.
latest news
support center
Fax: 770-578-1057
Email: bill@lawlessamerica.com
Website: www.lawlessamerica.com
tweet button
Tweet
facebook share
Share on facebook
find us on facebook
login
Username
Password
Remember me
LOGIN
Forgot login?
legal notice
I, William M. Windsor, am not an attorney. This
website expresses my OPINIONS. This website does
not provide legal advice. This website is to expose
corruption in our government and the federal
judiciary. Please read our Legal Notice and Terms.
Site Map
Judicial Corruption is Our fundamental rights Misconduct is Abuse, Dishonesty, Government Dishonesty is Bad.
rampant. Our rights to a fair have been taken away by everywhere. Dishonesty Corruption. It's all We must find honest people
trial are a myth. Many a government of wrongs. abounds. Perjury, common with Police and and make them accountable
judges are totally corrupt. Stolen by corruption. subornation of perjury, Law Enforcement. to We the People.
READ all about it. READ all about it. corruption! READ all about it. READ all about it.
READ all about it.
Headlines:
This was filed with Judge Julie Carnes, Chief Judge of the
corruption reports
United States District Court for the Northern District of
Georgia.
Sexual Misconduct
This same complaint is being sent to the Georgia State Bar Criminal Acts
Association. Perjury
Search All Reports
It is my hope that Carl Hugo Anderson will be disbarred. U.S. Senators
U.S. Congressmen
Verified Complaint of Professional Misconduct against Carl Hugo Anderson
Governors
The details of the complaint against Carl Hugo Anderson are many. I allege that he has Mayors
violated many Georgia Rules of Professional Conduct, many rules of the Federal Rules of Judges
Civil Procedure, Local Rules of the Northern District of Georgia, and has committed a Law Enforcement
number of violations of criminal statutes:
ATLANTA DIVISION
resources
VERIFIED COMPLAINT OF PROFESSIONAL MISCONDUCT AGAINST
Web Links
HAWKINS PARNELL THACKSTON YOUNG, CARL HUGO ANDERSON,
Terms of Use
SARAH BRIGHT, BRETT MENDELL,
Site Map
PHILLIPS LYTLE LLP, MARC W. BROWN, AND ARTHUR P. RUSS
About Us
1. This COMPLAINT is brought to expose the extreme dishonesty, numerous latest news
criminal acts, massive number of rule violations and professional misconduct of Maids
Windsor Banned from Filing a Lawsuit
Attorneys, especially Mr. Anderson and Mr. Brown. Anywhere in America
15.07.11
2. This COMPLAINT is made pursuant to LR 83.1C and LR 83.1F(2) of the Local
Rules (Civil Rules) of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia Federal Judge orders that Parties No
Longer have Constitutional Rights to
(LR), Rule 11 and 37 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (FRCP),Rules 3.1, 3.2, 3.3, Due Process
07.07.11
3.4, 4.1, and 8.4 of the Georgia Rules of Professional Conduct (GRPC), and the Courts
2 Hearings set on Same Day as Federal
Inherent Powers. The Thirty-Fifth Declaration of William M. Windsor (Dec #35) in Civil Judges try to "Steal Money" and avoid
Jail
Action No. 1:09-CV-02027-WSD is being submitted to Judge William S. Duffey for filing 07.07.11
contemporaneously with the submission of this COMPLAINT to the Chief Judge of the
Criminal Charges filed against Federal
Northern District of Georgia and is incorporated herein for all purposes. Dec #35 provides Judges and Clerks in Atlanta
06.07.11
a sworn statement as required by LR 83.1F(2). Dec #35 provides proof of the professional
misconduct of Maids Attorneys. Windsor succeeds in establishing
Federal Precedent Vital to Pro Se
Parties
3. LR 83.1 ATTORNEYS: ADMISSION TO PRACTICE BEFORE THE COURT -- F. 03.07.11
Attorney Discipline. (2) Misconduct of the Local Rules of the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Georgia states:
support center
Complaints of professional misconduct, including those referred
Fax: 770-578-1057
by judges, shall be submitted to the court in writing and shall state with particularity the Email: bill@lawlessamerica.com
Website: www.lawlessamerica.com
circumstances out of which the charges arose. Complaints submitted by counsel are subject
to the strictures of Fed.R.Civ.P. 11. All other complaints of professional misconduct, except
those submitted by judicial officers of this court, shall be under oath.
tweet button
Upon receipt of a complaint regarding the professional conduct of an attorney in a
Tweet
proceeding before this court or when a complaint regarding an attorneys conduct in a
proceeding in another court comes to the attention of this court, the district judge
before whom the case is pending or to whom the alleged misconduct in another facebook share
court has become known (or, in the district judge's discretion, the court) shall
Share on facebook
determine whether: [emphasis added]
managers. Proof is also provided in the exhibits to Declarations filed in MIST-1, especially LOGIN
Docs. 361, 362, 368, and 378. The CD-ROM and the Dockets in all matters related to Civil Forgot login?
Action No. 1:06-CV-0714-ODE (MIST-1), Civil Action No. 1:09-CV-02027-WSD (MIST- No account yet? Register
2), Civil Action No. 1:09-CV-01543-WSD (Deposition Action), and Civil Action No. 1:10-
CV-00197 (RJL) in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia (DC
Action) are referenced and incorporated herein as if attached hereto. The Microsoft Word legal notice
copies of affidavits on the CD-ROM are not signed, but all copies are signed, notarized, etc. I, William M. Windsor, am not an attorney. This
and filed with the courts. website expresses my OPINIONS. This website does
not provide legal advice. This website is to expose
corruption in our government and the federal
6. Judge Orinda D. Evans and Judge William S. Duffey are corrupt. Take one look at judiciary. Please read our Legal Notice and Terms.
this CD-ROM filled with EVIDENCE, and then consider the words of these judges when
Site Map
they falsely and maliciously claimed there was no evidence.
7. The problem in this matter is that there has been so much wrongdoing that the
list of the wrongdoing alone is massive. The proof is overwhelming. Windsor feels the best
way to deal with this will be with an evidentiary hearing in which the various violations of
the rules and the laws can be effectively illustrated in court. Windsor also asks this Court
to issue subpoenas to enable Windsor to obtain documents from these attorneys that will
prove wrongdoing. It would also help reduce the work that this Court will have to do on
this matter if Windsor can be issued subpoenas so he can take the depositions of these
attorneys. In a case like this, the most damaging proof is probably in the attorneys files.
Since this is a case of professional misconduct, fraud, and criminal violations, there can no
longer be attorney-client privilege.
8. Maids Attorneys have violated many rules and have committed numerous
criminal acts. Windsor has massive evidence of the violations and crimes. If this Court
doesnt want to do the reading necessary to review all the evidence, Windsor asks that the
Court advise Windsor what will make it easier for the Court. Windsor could provide an
electronic file that links all of the proof (linking to sworn Declarations and exhibits).
Windsor can present everything at an evidentiary hearing.
9. Windsor has spoken with the State Bar of Georgia about this matter, and Ms.
Carmen Rojas Rafter, Grievance Counsel for the State Bar of Georgia, asked that each
violation be set out as a separate statement paired with proof of the violation. The
magnitude of the rule violations is so great that Windsor has numbered each violation and
is presenting them in Dec #35.
10. Windsor has lost approximately $1,500,000 in legal fees on this matter. While
Windsor submits that the Court or the Committee on Discipline and the State Disciplinary
Boards of the State Bars should disbar Mr. Carl Hugo Anderson, Jr. (Mr. Anderson) and
Mr. Marc W. Brown (Mr. Brown), and such action will hopefully help others from being
victimized, Windsor will still be out $1,500,000 in legal fees that he should not have had
to incur. LR 83.1 allows sanctions of Discipline by this court may include disbarment,
suspension from practice for a definite time, reprimand, or other discipline which the
court deems proper. Rule 11 provides: the court may impose an appropriate sanction on
any attorney, law firm, or party that violated the rule or is responsible for the violation.
Absent exceptional circumstances, a law firm must be held jointly responsible for a
violation committed by its partner, associate, or employee.
11. FRCP Rule 11(c)(2) requires that a motion for sanctions must be made
separately from any other motion and must describe the specific conduct that allegedly
violates Rule 11(b). Windsor will submit a motion for sanctions to Judge Duffey in Civil
Action No. 1:09-CV-02027-WSD. Windsor will explain in that motion that it is tied to this
COMPLAINT.
12. William M. Windsor (Windsor) has provided proof to the Court that Maids
Attorneys have filed false sworn pleadings, have filed false pleadings, have filed improper
pleadings, have filed allegations and other factual contentions that lack evidentiary
support, have committed perjury, have obstructed justice, and have suborned perjury.
13. Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires that by presenting to the
court (whether by signing, filing, submitting, or later advocating) a pleading, written
motion, or other paper, an attorney is certifying that to the best of the persons knowledge,
information, and belief, formed after a reasonable inquiry under the circumstances, (1)
that it is not being presented for any improper purposes, such as to harass or to cause
unnecessary delay or needless increase in the cost of litigation; (2) the claims, defenses,
and other legal contentions therein are warranted by existing law or by a nonfrivolous
argument for the extension, modification, or reversal of existing law or the establishment
of new law; (3) the allegations and other factual contentions have evidentiary support or, if
specifically so identified, are likely to have evidentiary support after a reasonable
opportunity for further investigation or discovery; and (4) the denials of factual
contentions are warranted on the evidence or, if specifically so identified, are reasonably
based on a lack of information and belief.
14. The abuses in this lawsuit are immense. It is appalling what Maid and Maids
Attorneys have gotten away with in this case. Maid and Maids Attorneys have perpetrated
a fraud on the Court, and their abuse of Windsor is beyond words.
16. Windsor looks forward to illustrating the wrongful actions of Maid and Maids
Attorneys, and Windsor trusts that the Court will grant the Motion and send a message
that is loud and clear to Maid and Maids Attorneys as well as to others who would so
abuse our judicial system that the courts will not tolerate such abuse.
17. The record will show that Maids Attorneys have knowingly had Maid verify false
pleadings, have filed false sworn pleadings, have filed false pleadings, have filed improper
pleadings, have filed allegations and other factual contentions that lacked evidentiary
support, and Maids Attorneys have suborned perjury. Mr. Brown of PL drafted many of
the pleadings. Maids managers lied and committed hundreds of counts of perjury. Maids
Attorneys filed pleadings, motions, and other papers with knowledge that information
therein was false. Maids Attorneys filed pleadings, motions, and other papers for improper
purposes. Maids Attorneys filed pleadings, motions, and other papers to harass Windsor.
Maids Attorneys filed pleadings, motions, and other papers to increase the cost of
litigation. Maids Attorneys filed pleadings, motions, and other papers for which the claims,
defenses, and legal contentions were not warranted. Maids Attorneys filed pleadings,
motions, and other papers for which the allegations and contentions did not have
evidentiary support. Maids Attorneys filed pleadings, motions, and other papers for which
the denials of factual contentions were not warranted.
18. This should subject Mr. Anderson and Mr. Brown to professional discipline for
knowingly making false statements of fact; assisting a client in illegal or fraudulent
conduct; engaging in conduct involving fraud, dishonesty, deceit, or misrepresentation;
and engaging in conduct reflecting adversely on the attorney's fitness to practice law.
Attorneys have a duty to not knowingly advance a claim or defense that is unwarranted
under existing law and knowingly making false statements of law or fact, and such
prohibitions even more strongly apply to claims made in verified pleadings as in this case.
19. The obvious intent of the rules is to deter frivolous or untrue claims by requiring
that they be sworn to. Verifications are not to be taken lightly, and false sworn affidavits,
false testimony, and false verification are a form of perjury. Verification, like sworn
testimony, must be so direct and unequivocal as to subject the affiant to perjury if untrue.
20. Truth is the cornerstone of the judicial system; a license to practice law requires
allegiance and fidelity to truth. Filing a lawsuit requires honesty and truth. Maids
Attorneys ignored honesty and ignored the truth because they had to lie and suborn
perjury in hopes of prevailing in the litigation. Maids Attorneys should no longer be
allowed to practice law.
21. Civil Action No. 1:06-CV-0714-ODE (MIST-1) began with a Verified Complaint with
46 of the 50 paragraphs that were false or incorrect. Exhibit 2 to the Third Declaration
of William M. Windsor in MIST-1 itemizes proof to show that 44 of the 46 paragraphs
are proven false by the Plaintiffs testimony or by documents. [CD-ROM file: Motion to
Reopen - Exhibit 1 to Third Declaration of William M Windsor.]
22. Judge Orinda D. Evans (Judge Evans) signed an Order Granting Preliminary
Injunction against Defendants (the PI Order) on May 11, 2006. Much of the false
information provided by Maids Attorneys is in the PI Order. By Windsors count, the
PI Order contains as many as 39 false statements or conclusions based on false
statements, and the Proposed Order and Corrected Proposed Order Granting
Preliminary Injunction Against Defendants contains as many as 164 false, inaccurate,
or deceptive statements or conclusions based on false statements. [CD-ROM file:
Motion to Reopen - Exhibit 7 - Proposed Order Granting Preliminary Injunction - False
Statements - 2009-04-21 - Exhibit 9 - Order Granting Preliminary Injunction - False
Statements - 2009-04-21.]
23. Windsor gathered evidence that will establish that Maids Attorneys have filed several
false sworn affidavits in MIST-1 and that Maids President, Christopher Glynn, gave
false sworn testimony, and that Maids Vice-President, Timothy P. Ruddy, has filed a
false sworn affidavit and gave false sworn testimony, and that Maids Controller and
chief financial manager, Robert J. Schul, gave false sworn testimony. [CD-ROM file:
Motion to Reopen - Exhibit 1 - Complaint and Glynn Affidavit 2005-08-25 - False
Statements - 2009-05-12; Motion to Reopen - Exhibit 3 - Maid of the Mist -
Interrogatories - False Statements - 2009-05-01; Motion to Reopen - Exhibit 4 - Maid
of the Mist - Glynn Affidavit 2006-03-14 - False Statements - 2009-05-01; Motion to
Reopen - Exhibit 6 - Motion to Reopen - Maid of the Mist - Glynn Injunction
Testimony 2006-04-11 - False Statements - 2009-05-01; Motion to Reopen - Exhibit 8
- Ruddy Affidavit 2006-05-02 - False Statements - 2009-04-21 final; Motion to
Reopen - Exhibit 10 - Ruddy Deposition 2006-11-15 - False Statements - 2009-04-21 -
yellow removed; Motion to Reopen - Exhibit 11 - Glynn Deposition 2006-12-04 - False
Statements - 2009-04-21 - yellow removed; Motion to Reopen - Exhibit 12 - Schul
Deposition 2006-12-05 - False Statements - 2009-04-21 - yellow removed; Motion to
Reopen - Exhibit 14 - Ruddy Affidavit 2007-01-22 - False Statements - 2009-05-07;
Motion to Reopen - Exhibit 20 - Schul Affidavit - False Statements - 2009-05-07;
Motion to Reopen - Exhibit 21 - Corporation Deposition - False Statements - 2009-05-
07.]
24. Windsor has gathered evidence that establishes that key points presented to Judge
Evans in the Factual and Procedural Background recited in the PI Order are either
false or incorrect, and that Maids Attorneys knew or should have known that the
pleadings were false or incorrect. Similar proof has been identified with Maids
Attorneys summary judgment filings. [CD-ROM file: Motion to Reopen - Exhibit 13 -
Plaintiffs' Statement of Undisputed Facts for SJ - False Statements - 2009-04-22 -
ready for Kinko's.]
25. Windsor has proven that the Plaintiffs have made many hundreds of FALSE
SWORN STATEMENTS. Windsors proof filed in MIST-1 was never controverted
in any manner. The Plaintiffs filed absolutely no sworn affidavits in any attempt to
defend themselves.
27. Maids Attorneys made as many as 166 statements that Windsor has shown are
false or incorrect in the Proposed Order and Corrected Proposed Order Granting
Preliminary Injunction that resulted in as many as 39 statements that Windsor has shown
are false or incorrect in the Preliminary Injunction Order signed by Judge Evans.
28. Maids Attorneys filed alleged Statements of Undisputed Fact in their Motion
for Summary Judgment that include as many as 130 statements that Windsor has shown
are false or incorrect. An analysis of the Summary Judgment Order reveals that the
Summary Judgment Order contains 416 sentences. TWO HUNDRED AND TEN (210) of
the 416 statements by Judge Evans are false or incorrect.
29. The record of the Court in MIST-1 will show that Maids Attorneys have filed
pleading after pleading after pleading that are false, contain false statements, and contain
false sworn affidavits. The record of the Court in MIST-1 will show that Maids Attorneys
have filed improper allegations and pleadings that lack evidentiary support. The record of
the Court in MIST-1 will show that Maids Attorneys have committed perjury and have
suborned perjury.
31. Judge Evans signed a Summary Judgment Order on August 7, 2007. The grant of
the order was based on the false sworn affidavits, false sworn testimony, and false
pleadings filed by Maids Attorneys.
32. Maids Attorneys have not simply slipped up and made a little mistake that
resulted in an incorrect statement regarding an inconsequential issue in an affidavit.
Maids Attorneys have established a pattern and practice of lies, multiple false sworn
statements in multiple false sworn affidavits by multiple people, false sworn testimony at
the Preliminary Injunction Hearing, in their depositions, and more. These were material
false statements. Maids Attorneys have fabricated the claim upon which they obtained a
Temporary Restraining Order, a Preliminary Injunction, a Summary Judgment, and more.
33. Maids Attorneys have knowingly had their client verify false pleadings. This
should subject Mr. Anderson and Mr. Brown to professional discipline for knowingly
making false statements of fact; assisting a client in illegal or fraudulent conduct; engaging
in conduct involving fraud, dishonesty, deceit, and misrepresentation; and engaging in
conduct reflecting adversely on the attorney's fitness to practice law. Attorneys have a duty
to not knowingly advance a claim or defense that is unwarranted under existing law and
knowingly making a false statement of law or fact.
34. Windsor will show that these statements were knowingly and deliberately
falsified to serve the improper needs of Maids Attorneys, to inflict pain, suffering, and
financial loss on Windsor.
35. There have been many violations of the State Bar of Georgia Code of
Professional Conduct by Maids Attorneys. The categories of violations are listed below.
Dec #35 provides the proof of each infraction.
The Verified Complaint in this case was false. 46 of the 50 sworn paragraphs were false or
incorrect, and deposition testimony from the Plaintiffs witnesses have proven many of
these false sworn statements. Windsor believes 44 of the 50 are proven false below by the
testimony of an employee of the Plaintiffs or by documents. The Verified Complaint
apparently wasnt investigated by Mr. Anderson. It should have been clear that the action
would serve merely to harass or maliciously injure the Defendants. The Plaintiffs knew that
many of the claims in the Verified Complaint were false. The Plaintiffs and their attorneys
specifically knew that the claim that the Defendants stole money from customers and other
claims were false. Details of the False Statements in the Verified Complaint are provided
on the CD-ROM and in Dec #35 [CD-ROM file: 35 - Verified Action - MIST-2 - Thirty-Fifth
Declaration - 2010-10-10.]
44. Mr. Anderson filed alleged proof of damages on tortious interference claim with
no proof. After having sworn testimony from the customers involved that proved there
were no damages, he made the same claim yet again in the summary judgment filing in his
so-called Statement of Facts.
45. Mr. Anderson filed statements of facts that were not supported by any evidence
as well as statements of facts that were false and were not evidence before the Court.
Most of the so-called facts filed at the preliminary injunction and summary judgment
were false or evidence that was not before the Court. Details of the False Statements are
provided on pages 1052 to 1691 and 2378 to 3038 of Dec #35.
46. Details of the False Statements in the Glynn Affidavit dated August 25, 2005 are
provided on pages 365 to 554 of Dec #35. 46 of the 50 sworn paragraphs were false or
incorrect. Windsor believes 44 of the 50 are proven false below by the testimony of an
employee of the Plaintiffs or by documents.
47. Details of the False Statements in Interrogatories are provided on pages 682 to
716 of Dec #35.
48. Details of the False Statements in the Glynn Affidavit dated March 14, 2006 are
provided on pages 732 to 832 of Dec #35.
49. Details of the False Statements in the Updated Motion for TRO are provided on
pages 732 to 832 of Dec #35.
50. Details of the False Statements in the Glynn Preliminary Injunction Testimony
are provided on pages 855 to 1039 of Dec #35.
51. Details of the False Statements in the Proposed Order and Corrected Proposed
Order Granting Preliminary Injunction are provided on pages 1052 to 1690 of Dec #35.
Windsor has identified as many as 164 statements in the Proposed Order (MIST-1 Docket
#27) that are false, incorrect, or omit important information or that he believes are false or
incorrect. Testimony of the Plaintiffs managers, documents, and the fact that most of these
statements are not anywhere in the record before the Court proves that 158 of the 164 are
false.
52. Details of the False Statements in the Ruddy Affidavit dated May 2, 2006 are
provided on pages 1044 to 1052 of Dec #35. There was one false statement in this
declaration, and that has been proven by documents provided by the Plaintiffs.
53. Details of the False Statements in the Preliminary Injunction Order are provided
on pages 1691 to 1791 of Dec #35. Windsor has identified at least 39 statements in the
Order that are false, incorrect, or omit important information or that he believes are false
or incorrect. Windsor believes 17 of the 39 are proven false below by the testimony of a
Maid employee or by documents.
54. Details of the False Statements in the Ruddy Deposition are provided on pages
1861 to 2044 of Dec #35. In his deposition testimony on November 15, 2006, Mr. Timothy
P. Ruddy made numerous false statements 139 statements that Windsor believes are
false or incorrect: 76 of the 139 statements have been proven to be false with other
testimony of Ruddy, testimony of the two other corporate officers for the Plaintiffs,
documents, or the testimony of a third party.
55. Details of the False Statements in the Glynn Deposition are provided on pages
2063 to 2196 of Dec #35. In his deposition testimony on December 4, 2006, Mr.
Christopher Glynn has made 89 false statements, or statements that Windsor believes are
false. 32 of the 89 statements have been proven false by the testimony of another manager
for the Plaintiffs, documents, or testimony of a third party. The 89 statements include 278
additional false statements as he claimed prior lies in various documents were true.
56. Details of the False Statements in the Schul Deposition are provided on pages
2194 to 2272 of Dec #35. In his deposition testimony on December 4, 2006, Mr. Robert J.
Schul has made 54 false statements, or statements that Windsor believes are false. 22 of
the 54 statements have been proven false by the testimony of another manager for the
Plaintiffs, documents, or testimony of a third party.
57. Details of the False Statements in the Statement of Undisputed facts for
Summary Judgment are provided on pages 2378 to 3038 of Dec #35.
58. Details of the False Statements in the Summary Judgment Order are provided
on pages 3133 to 3445 of Dec #35.
59. Details of Rule 11 violations are provided in Exhibit 23 to the Third Declaration
of William M. Windsor in support of the Motion to Reopen Case filed in MIST-1 on April
24, 2009.
63. The Verified Complaint was clearly frivolous as 46 of the sworn paragraphs were
false. This action was taken for the purpose of harassing and maliciously injuring the
Defendants. Maid attorneys were unable to honestly make a good faith argument on the
merits of the action taken or to support the action taken by a good faith argument for an
extension, modification or reversal of existing law.
65. Maid attorneys had an obligation to dismiss the lawsuit or withdraw, and he did
not. Maids Attorneys knew that extensive information presented to the Court by the
Plaintiffs was false, but they never advised the Court and never amended the pleadings.
67. Maid Attorneys repeatedly abused legal procedure. Mr. Anderson abused
discovery as a tool to disadvantage the Defendants. Mr. Anderson abused mediation as a
tool to disadvantage the Defendants. Mr. Anderson filed false pleadings. Mr. Anderson
filed false sworn pleadings. Mr. Anderson routinely filed variations of pleadings which
served to increase the litigation costs of the Defendants. Mr. Anderson failed to produce
the documents requested when due in December 2005; produced most of the documents
less than 60 days before the close of discovery; produced some critical documents less than
30 days before the close of discovery after the lawsuit had been pending for 16 month; and
never produced other documents. Mr. Anderson listed nine adults and claimed they did not
buy tickets and established damages for tortious interference, but the nine adults did buy
tickets, and Mr. Anderson knew it. He had affidavits in hand that proved these nine people
did buy tickets. Mr. Anderson filed a Motion for TRO and Preliminary Injunction when he
had emails in hand from Mr. Brian Raley, attorney for the Defendants, explaining that
Alcatraz Media was not doing what Mr. Anderson was accusing Alcatraz of doing. Most of
this is detailed in Dec #35.
68. Maid attorneys participated in faking the claim that a customer purchased a
voucher in 2006 to manufacture a claim for tortious interference that the Court accepted
as a fact. Mr. Anderson regularly lied to the Defendants attorney, Mr. Raley, and to
Windsor, who was pro se, on a verity of subjects. Mr. Anderson filed the false sworn
affidavit of Timothy Ruddy when Mr. Anderson had produced contracts to the Defendants
on December 30, 2005 that proved Ruddys Affidavit to be false and proved testimony at
the Preliminary Injunction Hearing of Glynn, the President of the Plaintiffs, to be false. Mr.
Anderson filed the false sworn Affidavit of Christopher Glynn on March 16, 2006.
69. Mr. Anderson pretended the Plaintiffs had no knowledge of contracts and
claimed the Defendants changed their position on the contract when the first thing he ever
received from the Defendants after the lawsuit was filed was a letter from Windsor that
outlined the two contracts. Mr. Anderson actually produced the letter in December 30,
2005 document production, so he cannot deny receipt of the letter. Windsor believes that
Mr. Anderson probably participated in the alteration of documents. The actions of Mr.
Anderson caused a TRO and injunction to be granted against the Defendants in MIST-1
based upon false testimony. The record before the courts includes a number of examples
where one version of documents was produced in response to requests for production of
documents, but those same documents plus handwritten notes on the documents were filed
with Maids summary judgment filing. The testimony of Robert J. Schul in his deposition
proves that documents were provided to Maids Attorneys that were not produced to the
Defendants as they should have been.
70. Mr. Anderson allowed perjury galore. Mr. Anderson knew the Plaintiffs
witnesses were lying. Windsor believes he coached them to lie. A time slip from Phillips &
Lytle indicates that time was spent rewording affidavits in an attempt to avoid perjury. The
result can be seen in affidavits filed by the Plaintiffs that avoid literal perjury by making
nonsensical statements that at first seem to be saying something didnt happen, but then a
few words are added to the end of the statement to give it a different meaning literally. For
example: I never said we will agree to an oral contract for the 2005 season or for a giant
pink rabbit. The addition of or for a giant pink rabbit would make this statement
literally true if the person never said all of that statement.
71. Maid attorneys failed to list witnesses or provide any contact information on
witnesses needed by the Defendants. The Plaintiffs interrogatory answers, which are part
of the record, list only five witnesses. The Plaintiffs refused to produce one of the five and
then came up with affidavits for people not listed as witnesses at summary judgment. Mr.
Anderson filed excessive motions galore to run up the costs of the Defendants. Many,
many motions were filed multiple times.
72. Mr. Anderson did improper coaching of witnesses during depositions. Mr.
Anderson refused to allow the Defendants to take preservation of testimony depositions -
telling the Defendants he would file actions in every state to stop the Defendants. Mr.
Anderson refused to allow the Defendants to conduct discovery during mediation, and then
he prolonged the mediation to eat up the discovery time.
73. Windsor believes Mr. Anderson falsely claimed Mr. Timothy Ruddy could not
appear for the Maid of the Mist Corporation 30(b)(6) deposition because of a death in the
family. Windsor suspects that Mr. Anderson participated in the destruction of evidence.
Mr. Anderson submitted a Proposed Order and Corrected Proposed Order Granting
Preliminary Injunction that contained information that he knew was not in the record and
knew was false.
74. Mr. Anderson withheld documents related to Judy Berry throughout the
lawsuit. Windsor saw him reading from them at the Preliminary Injunction Hearing and
during Windsors deposition. Windsor called him on it at the deposition, and he lied. Then
Windsor took Berry's deposition after discovery had closed, and two affidavits showed up
as well as communication with Berry by Maid's attorneys. These documents had not been
produced. Windsor called him on it, and Mr. Anderson stated in emails and letters that the
affidavits were sent to the Defendants with a supplemental production. They were not.
This is easily proven by examination of the supplemental production in MIST-1.
76. Maid attorneys delayed the litigation through filing excessive motions,
amendments, updates, and corrections as well as by stalling the discovery process in every
way imaginable.
78. Maid attorneys brought the administration of justice into disrepute. The
Verified Complaint in this case was false. 46 of the 50 sworn paragraphs
were false or incorrect, and deposition testimony from the Plaintiffs
witnesses have proven these false sworn statements. The Verified
Complaint wasnt drafted by Mr. Anderson. It apparently wasnt
investigated by Mr. Anderson. It should have been clear that the action
would serve merel to harass or maliciously injure the Defendants. The
Plaintiffs knew that many of the claims in the Verified Complaint were
false. Maid and Maids Attorneys specifically knew that the claim that the
Defendants stole money from customers and other claims were false.
Details of the False Statements in the Verified Complaint are provided in
Exhibit #1 to the Third Declaration of William M. Windsor, attached to
the Motion to Reopen Case filed April 24, 2009. [CD-ROM files: Motion
to Reopen - Exhibit 1 - Complaint and Glynn Affidavit 2005-08-25 - False
Statements - 2009-05-12.]
79. Mr. Anderson filed alleged proof of damages on tortious interference claim with
no proof. After having sworn testimony from the customers involved that proved there
were no damages, he made the same claim yet again in the summary judgment filing. Mr.
Anderson filed statements of facts that were not supported by any evidence as well as
statements of facts that were false and were not evidence before the Court.
80. Mr. Anderson withheld important documents claiming irrelevant. Mr. Anderson
abused the discovery process in every way imaginable. Mr. Anderson failed to produce
documents provided by client. Mr. Anderson produced documents a year late at the end of
discovery when it was too late for the defendants to do anything with them.
81. Maid attorneys failed to produce witnesses for depositions. Mr. Anderson
refused to provide names and contact information for witnesses.
82. Mr. Anderson filed duplicative motions and court filings as a routine practice.
Mr. Anderson used the mediation process to run out the discovery clock. Mr. Anderson
delayed producing the first Plaintiffs deponent until 45 days before the close of discovery.
Mr. Anderson delayed in producing important documents until 25 days before the close of
discovery documents due 11 months before.
83. Maids Attorneys have violated RULE 3.3L CANDOR TOWARD THE
TRIBUNAL Lawyers shall not make a false statement of material fact or law to a
tribunal. Mr. Anderson made many false statements of fact. Mr. Anderson made false
statements of material facts to the courts in Civil Action Nos. 1:06-CV-0714-ODE, 1:09-CV-
01543-WSD, 1:09-CV-02027-WSD, and in numerous appellate court filings.
84. Mr. Anderson heard the false pleadings proven to be false by the testimony of
the employees of the client and did nothing about it. Mr. Anderson used false documents
to obtain the Preliminary Injunction. Mr. Anderson suborned perjury. Maid attorneys
counseled their client on how to be tricky in wording affidavits to avoid perjury. Mr.
Anderson tampered with witnesses.
85. Mr. Anderson came to know the falsity of material evidence, but he never took
remedial measures. He heard the sworn testimony in the case by his own clients that
proved hundreds of false sworn statements. Mr. Anderson knew that his clients employees
had committed multiple counts of perjury but he failed to make disclosure to avoid
assisting criminal and fraudulent acts by his client.
86. Maids Attorneys have violated RULE 3.3: CANDOR TOWARD THE
TRIBUNAL Lawyers shall not fail to disclose a material fact to a tribunal when
disclosure is necessary to avoid assisting a criminal or fraudulent act by the client.
87. Maid Attorneys never disclosed any of the material facts to the courts that they
knew about criminal and fraudulent acts by the Plaintiffs.
88. Maids Attorneys have violated RULE 3.3: CANDOR TOWARD THE
TRIBUNAL Lawyers shall not offer evidence that the lawyer knows to be false.
89. Maid Attorneys offered a massive amount of false evidence. Documents used in
MIST-1 include falsified documents and documents that appeared in one form before
discovery closed and then in a different form as part of the summary judgment filing.
90. Maids Attorneys have violated RULE 3.3: CANDOR TOWARD THE
TRIBUNAL If a lawyer has offered material evidence and comes to know of its falsity,
the lawyer shall take reasonable remedial measures.
91. Maid attorneys knew that material evidence they offered was false, but they took
no remedial measures whatsoever. Maid attorneys knew the Verified Complaint was false,
but they did nothing. They knew the motion for temporary restraining order and
preliminary injunction was false, but they did nothing. They knew the motion for summary
judgment was false. They knew that motions for sanctions were false and without legal
basis. They filed a motion to have Windsor, his son, and Alcatraz Media found in
contempt, and they knew the motion was frivolous and totally without factual or legal
foundation. They knew documents were false or incorrect. They knew witnesses had
committed perjury. They never took any remedial measures.
92. Maids Attorneys have violated RULE 3.3: CANDOR TOWARD THE
TRIBUNAL When evidence that a lawyer knows to be false is provided by a person
who is not the client, the lawyer must refuse to offer it regardless of the client's wishes.
94. Maids Attorneys have violated RULE 3.3: CANDOR TOWARD THE
TRIBUNAL An advocate must disclose the existence of the client's deception to the
court or to the other party.
95. Maid attorneys knew that material evidence they offered was false, but they did
not notify Judge Evans or the Defendants. Maid attorneys knew the Verified Complaint
was false; they knew the motion for temporary restraining order and preliminary
injunction was false; they knew the motion for summary judgment was false; they knew
motions for sanctions were false; they knew motions for contempt were false; they knew
various filings in the appellate courts were false; but they did nothing. They knew
documents were false or incorrect. They knew witnesses had committed perjury. They
never notified the courts or the Defendants.
96. Maids Attorneys have violated RULE 3.3: CANDOR TOWARD THE
TRIBUNAL If there is an issue whether the client has committed perjury, the lawyer
cannot represent the client in resolution of the issue, and a mistrial may be unavoidable.
97. Maid attorneys knew their client committed perjury, but they did nothing. Mr.
Anderson is especially guilty of this as he sat through every deposition and hearing and was
involved with everything that happened once the lawsuit was filed.
98. Maids Attorneys have violated RULE 3.3: CANDOR TOWARD THE
TRIBUNAL An advocate must disclose the existence of perjury with respect to a
material fact, even that of a client.
100. Maids Attorneys have violated RULE 3.3: CANDOR TOWARD THE
TRIBUNAL A lawyer has authority to refuse to offer testimony or other proof that the
lawyer believes is untrustworthy.
102. Maids Attorneys have violated RULE 3.3: CANDOR TOWARD THE
TRIBUNAL Lawyers have a special obligation to protect a tribunal against criminal or
fraudulent conduct.
105. Maid attorneys concealed evidence, altered evidence, withheld evidence until
the last few days of discovery, and much more. Mr. Anderson withheld important
documents claiming they were irrelevant when they were not. Mr. Anderson abused the
discovery process in every way imaginable. Mr. Anderson failed to produce documents
provided by client. This is proven by extensive deposition testimony of Mr. Robert Schul,
Controller for the Plaintiffs. Mr. Anderson produced documents a year late at the end of
discovery when it was too late for the defendants to do anything with them. Maid attorneys
failed to produce witnesses for depositions. Maid attorneys failed to provide names and
contact information for witnesses. Windsor believes Maids Attorneys filed bogus
documents with Judge Evans for in camera inspection, and Judge Evans did not allow
Windsor to see the documents. These documents will prove fraud upon the courts.
107. Maid Attorneys concealed and withheld many documents. Maid attorneys
blocked access to important documents.
109. Maid attorneys wrongly frustrated the rights of the Defendants to establish a
claim or defense by participating in altering, concealing, and/or destroying evidence for the
purpose of impairing its availability in a pending proceeding
111. Maid attorneys falsified evidence. Mr. Andersons Proposed Order and
Corrected Proposed Order and Statement of Facts at preliminary injunction was false. Mr.
Andersons alleged Statement of Facts at summary judgment was false. Mr. Anderson
committed perjury, and Maid attorneys suborned perjury by allowing their clients and
others to submit false evidence.
113. Maid attorneys suborned perjury by allowing their clients and others to submit
false evidence. Windsor believes Maid attorneys drafted false affidavits intentionally and
put words in the mouths of witnesses.
115. Maid attorneys suborned perjury by allowing their clients and others to submit
false evidence. Windsor believes Maid attorneys drafted false affidavits intentionally and
put words in the mouths of witnesses. Windsor believes Maid attorneys advised witnesses
to refuse to appear for depositions. Windsor believes Maid attorneys coached witnesses as
to what to say in depositions and affidavits.
117. Maid attorneys included two bogus criminal charges in the Verified Complaint
theft and bribery -- for the apparent purpose of trying to obtain advantage in the civil
matter. The Time Slips of Maid attorneys show that Maid attorneys contacted both the New
York Attorney General and the Georgia Athletic and Entertainment Commission in what
Windsor alleges is an attempt to fabricate criminal charges.
121. Maid attorneys totally disregarded the rights of the Defendants and the
attorney for the Defendants. Mr. Anderson lied to the Defendants and to the attorney for
the Defendants.
123. Maid attorneys made false statements of material facts as a routine matter. Mr.
Anderson led to the Defendants and their attorney. Mr. Anderson lied in court. Mr.
Anderson allowed his client to lie hundreds of times.
125. Windsor has submitted that Plaintiffs committed many fraudulent and criminal
acts. Maid attorneys never disclosed anything.
127. Maid attorneys lied to the Defendants and their attorney. Mr. Anderson lied in
court. Mr. Anderson allowed his client to lie hundreds of times. Mr. Anderson failed to
correct false statements made by his client. Mr. Anderson attended the depositions where
he heard witnesses for the Plaintiffs swear to testimony that proved false statements made
by other witnesses for the Plaintiffs. Mr. Anderson presented false statements in the
Proposed Order and Corrected proposed Order Granting Preliminary Injunction and in the
so-called Statement of Facts at summary judgment.
130. Maids Attorneys have violated RULE 4.4: RESPECT FOR RIGHTS OF
THIRD PERSONS Lawyers shall not use means that have no substantial purpose
other than to embarrass, delay, or burden a third person.
131. Maid attorneys filed MIST-1to embarrass and burden the Defendants. The
lawsuit is especially egregious as to Windsor, because he did nothing wrongful that Maid
attorneys and the Plaintiffs claimed he did personally.
133. Mr. Mendell and Ms. Bright had a duty to inform the appropriate professional
authority about Mr. Andersons violations. Mr. Anderson had a duty to inform the
appropriate professional authority about Mr. Browns violations. I do not believe anyone
was notified of anything.
135. Maid attorneys should have reported Judge Evans, but they were happy to be
the recipient of violations that were repeatedly favorable to them.
136. Maids Attorneys have violated RULE 8.4 MISCONDUCT Lawyers
shall not violate or attempt to violate the Georgia Rules of Professional Conduct, knowingly
assist or induce another to do so, or do so through the acts of another.
137. Maid attorneys committed many violations of the Georgia Rules of Professional
Conduct. Mr. Anderson violated the Georgia Rules of Professional Conduct routinely. Mr.
Anderson knowingly assisted or induced others to do so.
141. Anyone who willfully makes false statements made under oath before a
competent tribunal, officer or person or expressly under penalty of perjury, on a material
matter which the defendant does not believe to be true violates 18 U.S.C. 1621.
142. H&P and Mr. Anderson are guilty of Perjury in violation of 18 U.S.C. 1621.
H&P and Mr. Anderson knowingly made false, material statements or declarations that
they knew were false at the time, made in a proceeding before or ancillary to a court. These
statements were made voluntarily and intentionally.
143. Proof of these false statements is detailed in Dec #35 filed in 1:09-CV-02027
and in Dec #25 MIST-1 Doc. 462 and in the Verified Complaint in MIST-2.
145. Anyone who knowingly makes any false material declaration under oath in a
court proceeding violates 18 USC 1623 (a).
146. H&P and Mr. Anderson are guilty of Perjury in violation of 18 U.S.C. 1623.
147. H&P and Mr. Anderson knowingly made false, material statements or
declarations that she knew were false at the time, made in a proceeding before or ancillary
to a court. These statements were made voluntarily and intentionally.
148. Proof of these false statements is detailed in Dec #35 filed in 1:09-CV-02027
and in Dec #25 MIST-1 Doc. 462 and in the Verified Complaint in MIST-2.
149. Perjured testimony is an obvious and flagrant affront to the basic concepts of
judicial proceedings.
150. 18 USC 371 makes it a federal crime or offense for anyone to conspire or
agree with someone else to defraud the United States or any of its agencies. To "defraud"
the United States means to interfere with or obstruct one of its lawful governmental
functions by deceit, craft, or trickery.
151. The accused attorneys were part of a conspiracy to defraud the United States.
152. Defendants agreed to take various actions to obstruct justice with the federal
courts.
153. Defendants performed acts and/or made statements that they knew to be false,
fraudulent, and/or deceitful in courts, which disrupted the functions of the courts.
Defendants obstructed legitimate government functions. Defendants knew statements were
false or fraudulent when made.
154. Several of the conspirators committed overt acts of obstruction of justice. The
overt acts were knowingly committed to carry out the object of the conspiracy or were
carried out by failing to take action to stop it.
157. H&P and Mr. Anderson have falsified, concealed and/or covered up material
facts by trick, scheme and/or device.
158. H&P and Mr. Anderson have made false, fictitious and/or fraudulent
statements or representations.
160. H&P and Mr. Anderson have made or used false writing and/or documents
knowing the same to contain false, fictitious, and/or fraudulent statements or entries.
161. The specifics of false representations are detailed in the Factual Background
provided in MIST-1 Docket 462, 377, 378, and 474, referenced and incorporated herein as
if attached hereto.
162. H&P and Mr. Anderson have each falsified, concealed, or covered up a material
fact by tricks, schemes, or devices; made false, fictitious or fraudulent statements or
representations; and made or used false documents or writings.
163. Facts that have been falsified, concealed, or covered up were material, made
knowingly and willfully, and made in relation to matters in the NDGa, WDNY, or the
Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals.
164. False, fictitious, or fraudulent statements made were material, made knowingly
and willfully, and made in relation to matters in the N.D.Ga, W.D.N.Y., or the Eleventh
Circuit Court of Appeals.
165. False documents or writing used by H&P and Mr. Anderson were false,
material, made knowingly and willfully, and made in relation to matters in the N.D.Ga.,
W.D.N.Y., or the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals.
166. Statements were made both orally and in writing. 18 U.S.C. 1001 does not
require that statements be sworn, so it covers all writings by Mr. Anderson and H&P.
167. Statements were made with reckless disregard of the truthfulness of the
statements or with a conscious purpose to avoid learning the truthfulness of the
statements.
168. Mr. Anderson and H&P signed affidavits that were filed containing false
statements. The statements made were false, material, made knowingly and willfully, and
made in relation to matters in the NDGa, WDNY, or the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals.
169. The statements were made with an intent to deceive, a design to induce belief
in the falsity, and/or to mislead.
170. Details are provided in Evans Docket 462, Evans Docket 377 Amended
Declaration #3 and Exhibits 9 and 22 thereto, Evans Docket 378, and Evans Docket 474,
referenced and incorporated herein as if attached hereto.
171. Statements were made that contemplated that the statements were to be utilized
in courts of the State of Georgia and/or United States.
172. H&P and Mr. Anderson either knew statements were false or acted with a
conscious purpose to avoid learning the truth.
MISPRISION OF A FELONY
176. Article 18, Sec. 4, of the United States Code, "Whoever having knowledge of
the actual commission of a felony, cognizable by a court of the United States, conceals and
does not as soon as possible, make known the same to some judge or other person in civil
or military authority, under the United States, is guilty of the federal crime of Misprision of
a felony."
177. The accused attorneys had knowledge of felonies. They did not report the
felonies or take action on the felonies. This makes them guilty of Misprision of Felonies.
178. This Court should refer this matter to the appropriate authorities for action.
CONSPIRACY TO SUBORN PERJURY VIOLATION OF 18 USC 1622
180. H&P and Mr. Anderson conspired to procure the perjury corruptly.
181. H&P and Mr. Anderson knew, believed, or had reason to believe it to be false
testimony.
182. H&P and Mr. Anderson knew, believed, or had reason to believe that the
perjurer had knowledge of the falsity of his or her testimony.
184. The testimony given was false. At the time the witnesses testified, the witnesses knew
the testimony was false. The witnesses gave such testimony voluntarily and intentionally.
The false testimony was material.
187. H&P and Mr. Anderson knew, believed, or had reason to believe it to be false
testimony.
188. H&P and Mr. Anderson knew, believed, or had reason to believe that the perjurer had
knowledge of the falsity of his or her testimony.
190. The testimony given was false. At the time the witnesses testified, the witnesses knew
the testimony was false. The witnesses gave such testimony voluntarily and intentionally.
The false testimony was material.
193. H&P and Mr. Anderson knew, believed, or had reason to believe it to be false
testimony.
194. H&P and Mr. Anderson knew, believed, or had reason to believe that the perjurer had
knowledge of the falsity of his or her testimony.
196. The testimony given was false. At the time the witnesses testified, the witnesses knew
the testimony was false. The witnesses gave such testimony voluntarily and intentionally.
The false testimony was material.
199. H&P and Mr. Anderson knew, believed, or had reason to believe it to be false
testimony.
200. H&P and Mr. Anderson knew, believed, or had reason to believe that the perjurer had
knowledge of the falsity of his or her testimony.
202. The testimony given was false. At the time the witnesses testified, the witnesses knew
the testimony was false. The witnesses gave such testimony voluntarily and intentionally.
The false testimony was material.
205. H&P and Mr. Anderson knew, believed, or had reason to believe it to be false
testimony.
206. H&P and Mr. Anderson knew, believed, or had reason to believe that the perjurer had
knowledge of the falsity of his or her testimony.
208. The testimony given was false. At the time the witnesses testified, the witnesses knew
the testimony was false. The witnesses gave such testimony voluntarily and intentionally.
The false testimony was material.
209. Windsor has had serious eye problems in 2010. He has had three surgeries thus far,
and he may have more. At the present time, Windsor cannot effectively read anything
printed. This COMPLAINT has been written on a giant 30-inch monitor that sits
approximately 30-inches from Windsors eyes. Windsor can read the monitor with larger
type. But reading documents that are not in Microsoft Word on the computer screen is
essentially impossible. Windsor has ordered four new pairs of glasses, including an
experimental pair, and he hopes that pone of the four will enable him to read without
dizziness, headaches, and nausea. This COMPLAINT was written by copying, pasting, and
modifying information that Windsor had previously written. It does not yet provide the
level of detail that Windsor wants to provide for wrongdoing in 2009 and 2010. H&P and
Mr. Anderson have continued to file false pleadings and have violated many of the rules
cited above. Mr. Anderson has also made false statements to Judge Evans in hearings. Mr.
Anderson and H&P have illegally field liens against the personal asserts of both Windsor
and Windsors wife, who is not involved in any of this litigation. As soon as Windsor can
read, he will review all of the filings by Mr. Anderson and H&P in 2009 and 2010, and he
will prepare an itemized list of violations with the proof of the violations.
210. Windsor has been damaged by the violation of the rules, the Code of professional
Conduct, and these criminal statutes by Maids Attorneys. Windsor has been restrained or
enjoined since the Temporary Restraining Order was issued on April 3, 2006. Windsor has
incurred approximately ONE AND A HALF MILLION DOLLARS in litigation expense due
to the wrongful actions of Maids Attorneys. Windsor has incurred damages due to
refunds, expenses, lost profits, slander, and more.
WHEREFORE, Windsor respectfully requests that the Court do as follows:
(1) order that the Clerk of the Court issue subpoenas so Windsor can take depositions and
subpoena documents;
(6) order the Plaintiffs to repay the litigation expenses paid by Windsor
(8) bar the Plaintiffs from filing a similar complaint in another court;
(9) conduct a hearing to consider the perjury of Christopher Glynn, Timothy P. Ruddy,
Robert J. Schul, Sandra Carlson, and Judy Berry and hear the testimony of Glynn, Ruddy,
Schul, Carlson, and Berry;
(10) order that the alleged professional misconduct of Mr. Brown, Mr. Russ, and Phillips
Lytle, attorneys not a member of the State Bar of Georgia, justifies further inquiry by the
court and should be referred to a Committee on Discipline appointed by the court for
investigation;
(11) ask the State Bar of Georgia to investigate the actions of Mr. Anderson. Mr. Mendell,
Ms. Bright, and Hawkins Parnell; and
(12) ask the New York Bar Association to investigate the actions of Mr. Marc W. Brown,
Mr. Arthur Russ, and Phillips Lytle in this matter.
_______________________________
WILLIAM M. WINDSOR
Pro Se
Languages German
Born Glen Ridge, New Jersey, July 8, 1962
Judicial Corruption is Our fundamental rights Misconduct is Abuse, Dishonesty, Government Dishonesty is Bad.
rampant. Our rights to a fair have been taken away by everywhere. Dishonesty Corruption. It's all We must find honest people
trial are a myth. Many a government of wrongs. abounds. Perjury, common with Police and and make them accountable
judges are totally corrupt. Stolen by corruption. subornation of perjury, Law Enforcement. to We the People.
READ all about it. READ all about it. corruption! READ all about it. READ all about it.
READ all about it.
Headlines:
Advanced Search
search... SEARCH
Sexual Misconduct
Judicial Misconduct Complaints ( 22 Articles ) Criminal Acts
Judicial Misconduct Complaints Perjury
News Reports ( 72 Articles ) Search All Reports
News Reports
U.S. Senators
Articles ( 12 Articles )
Articles U.S. Congressmen
Videos ( 2 Articles ) Governors
Videos Mayors
Judges
Law Enforcement
resources
Web Links
Terms of Use
Site Map
About Us
10 minutes a day
latest news
support center
Fax: 770-578-1057
Email: bill@lawlessamerica.com
Website: www.lawlessamerica.com
tweet button
Tweet
login
Username
Password
Remember me
LOGIN
Forgot login?
legal notice
Site Map
Judicial Corruption is Our fundamental rights Misconduct is Abuse, Dishonesty, Government Dishonesty is Bad.
rampant. Our rights to a fair have been taken away by everywhere. Dishonesty Corruption. It's all We must find honest people
trial are a myth. Many a government of wrongs. abounds. Perjury,
trial are a myth. Many a government of wrongs. abounds. Perjury, common with Police and and make them accountable
judges are totally corrupt. Stolen by corruption. subornation of perjury, Law Enforcement. to We the People.
READ all about it. READ all about it. corruption! READ all about it. READ all about it.
READ all about it.
Headlines:
search... SEARCH
Title Filter Display # 20
2 Federal Judge orders that Parties No Longer have Constitutional Rights to Due Process
William M. Join the Cause
Windsor
One click to say you want HONESTY in
3 2 Hearings set on Same Day as Federal Judges try to "Steal Money" and avoid Jail Admin
government.
William M.
4 Criminal Charges filed against Federal Judges and Clerks in Atlanta
Windsor
6 Judicial and Government Corruption Meeting Scheduled for Atlanta - July 15, 2011
William M. Sexual Misconduct
Windsor
Criminal Acts
William M. Windsor testified again in Atlanta on July 1, 2011 - Charges of Corruption against 58 Federal William M.
7
Judges and Judicial Employees Windsor
Perjury
Search All Reports
William M. Windsor Testifies Again in Atlanta on July 1, 2011 - Charges of Corruption against 58 Federal William M.
8
Judges and Judicial Employees Windsor U.S. Senators
William M. U.S. Congressmen
9 Judge faced with Potential Landmark Ruling in Judicial Corruption Fight BAILS
Windsor Governors
10 Murder of Judicial Corruption Activist Sunny Sheu Admin Mayors
William M. Judges
11 Potential Landmark Ruling in Judicial Corruption Fight Coming Soon
Windsor Law Enforcement
William M. Windsor Testifies Today in Atlanta in Charges of Corruption against 58 Federal Judges and William M.
12
Judicial Employees Windsor
13 Family Court Judge Accused Of Domestic Violence Admin There are 1749 listings and 18 categories in our
website
14 Federal Judge Richard J. Leon covers up Corruption Joseph Zernik
William M. resources
16 Racketeering and Corrupt Organization Lawsuit filed against 7 Federal Judges and 9 Judicial Employees
Windsor
William M.
20 Windsor accused of Forgery by Federal Judge William S. Duffey
Windsor
1 2 3 4
10 minutes a day
Page 1 of 4
latest news
support center
Fax: 770-578-1057
Email: bill@lawlessamerica.com
Website: www.lawlessamerica.com
tweet button
Tweet
login
Username
Password
Remember me
LOGIN
Forgot login?
legal notice
Site Map
Judicial Corruption is Our fundamental rights Misconduct is Abuse, Dishonesty, Government Dishonesty is Bad.
rampant. Our rights to a fair have been taken away by everywhere. Dishonesty Corruption. It's all We must find honest people
trial are a myth. Many a government of wrongs. abounds. Perjury,
trial are a myth. Many a government of wrongs. abounds. Perjury, common with Police and and make them accountable
judges are totally corrupt. Stolen by corruption. subornation of perjury, Law Enforcement. to We the People.
READ all about it. READ all about it. corruption! READ all about it. READ all about it.
READ all about it.
You are here: News Judicial Corruption and Dishonesty News Reports