Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Jalynn Clancy
English 102
Dr. Wynne
Since 2002, the United States has had the highest incarceration rate in the world
(Tsai et al.) and it shows no signs of decreasing any time soon. Mass incarceration is a
complex issue; but the most perplexing segment of mass incarceration is analyzing which
solution will create the best outcome. To make this decision, there are 4 essential questions that
incarceration?
4. What are the policies being put into place to prevent mass incarceration?
The following literature review analyzes the several social, political, and judicial factors of
mass incarceration, the people that are affected by it, a multitude of prevention policies, and
Researchers have the tendency to blame growing incarceration rates on one sole policy or
social issue; but few have stopped to consider that there may be multiple different factors that
contribute to mass incarceration. To accuse one specific policy or idea as being the root of all
judicial and social injustice, over simplifies the issue and does the topic at hand a great
Clancy 2
disservice. To successfully decrease the rate of imprisonment, it is essential that America looks at
To locate the contributing factors of mass incarceration, a survey was conducted in March
2017, with the sole intention of gaining a general idea of possible public opinions on this subject.
This survey includes a relatively diverse group, of 25 participants, that volunteered to assist me
in my research. They were asked basic questions concerning demographics, such as age and
ethnicity, as well as opinion based questions that will be revealed throughout this review. The
first question on the survey asked if the participant was familiar with the concept of mass
incarceration. While 44% of the participants claimed to be familiar with the topic, 56% of the
participants lacked clarity on the subject matter (See Figure 1). The staggering percentage of
people with insufficient knowledge on mass incarceration lead to the understanding that the
deficiency in clear information on the subject could be a contributing factor. This is an important
The survey also asked participants if they felt like mass incarceration was an important
social issue; and although 76% of the participants felt like it was, 24% felt like it was somewhat
of an important issue, or not an important issue at all (See Figure 2). This data gives insight to
the likelihood that people not only lack education on mass incarceration, but it is possible that
Figure 1. Are you familiar with the concept of mass incarceration? Figure 2. Do you feel like mass incarceration is an important
Graph provided by SurveyMonkey.com social issue? Graph Provided by SurveyMonkey.com
Another contributing factor is poor education. This factor is often overlooked and
dismissed as being trivial; but it is a proven fact that prisoners tend to be less educated...
(Tsai et al.). Specifically, the average state prisoner has a 10th grade education, and about
70 percent [of the prisoners] have not completed high school (Tsai et al.). This is not a
coincidence. Most nonviolent offenders commit their crimes with the idea that it will create
success or financial security; but if these same criminals were supported through their
respective educational systems, maybe they would have chosen a better route. People are
products of their environment, and although creating a more consistent and reliable
educational system will not stop all criminals, it may curtail a few.
There are also legal factors such as longer sentences for similar crimes, high jail fees, and
increasing amount of people being sent to jail (Wrzesniewski). These influencers are discussed
by Jakub Wrzesniewski in his commentary entitled The Scariest Explanation for America's Vast
Prison Population: We Want It That Way. In this article, Wrzesniewski mentions the idea of
middle class entitlement and he molds this idea upon the fact that voters love a tough-on-crime
Clancy 4
candidate (Wrzesniewski) and rather than prefer rational punishment for all, voters aware of
unjust incarceration seem to prefer harsher, more callous treatment for all (Wrzesniewski). But,
the key element of middle class entitlement is that people can only feel this harsh towards
criminal punishment, if they are sure they will never be in the same situation (Wrzesniewski).
Wrzesniewski identifies lack of empathy as a contributing factor and calls for a nationwide shift
Is there a particular part of the justice system that plays a key role in the epidemic; or is it
Every segment of the justice system shares responsibility in the development of mass
incarceration. Laws such as mandatory minimum sentences and the increase in jail fees (as
mentioned previously) obviously hold some responsibility, but different segments within the
system play major roles as well. These segments can be divided into the imprisonment process,
and the rehabilitation process that allows prisoners to reunite with mainstream society.
Clancy 5
The arrest, jail, and court process need to be held accountable for part of the incarceration
rate. The process begins with a few policemen and women [cataloguing] demographic
information on
Figure 3. Pretrial policies drive jail
growth. Graph provided by Prison
suspects,
Policy Initiative: Compiled from the
Bureau of Justice Statistics Series
[identifying]
Prison and Jail Inmates at Midyear,
Correctional Populations in the United
those in groups
States, and Jail Inmates. Missing data
for 1994 extrapolated from 1993 and
with high rates of
1995 values.
crime, and
[ blatantly arresting] them for suspicion (Russell). This invasion of civil rights not only accounts
for who is incarcerated, but also the amount of people incarcerated (see figure 3). Specifically,
this encroachment on civil liberties is a violation of the Fourth Amendment which states the
right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable
Then the process moves into the legal and judicial processes, where prosecutors have
been proven to stack offenses to force the plaintiff into a plea bargain. They do this by
agreeing to drop a select number of the charges . In exchange for [the accused forfeiting] his
or her Fifth, Sixth and Fourteenth Amendment rights of protection against self-incrimination, to
trial by jury, to confront and cross-examine adverse witnesses, to present evidence, to compel the
attendance of witnesses, and to require prosecutors to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt
(Heiner). This method gives prosecutors a dangerous amount of power, while mandatory
Clancy 6
minimum sentences simultaneously [removes] discretionary power from judges who might
crime (Wrzesniewski). This system effectively ...mass-produces inmates, with little sensitivity
(Wrzesniewski).
The final division is the rehabilitation process; or rather the lack of. One challenge in
creating an effective reintegration program is distinguishing between the addict who may
have a high risk of recidivating for low- level offenses (for example, probation violations for
positive drug tests) and a released prisoner with a lower risk to recidivate but whose offenses
have a greater potential for lethality. (Lobuglio et al.). After shuffling for a solution to the
correctional facilities throughout the country . Ideally, the centers will be located near job and
transportation centers, and be run by local correctional and public safety agencies (Lobuglio et
al.). By investing in diverse correctional facilities, it is likely that prisoners will be able to
diminish some of the social pressures (lack of education, unemployment, and housing
discrimination), that might push them back into the judicial system.
Who are the groups of people that are directly and indirectly affected by mass
incarceration?
Every person, in every demographic and social class, is affected by mass incarceration;
but certain ethnicities are impacted more than others. It is a well-known and indisputable fact
that minority members are more likely to be arrested, more likely to be charged, less likely to
have the charge bargained down, more likely to be found guilty, and more likely to get a longer
sentence (Wrzesniewski); but this is not necessarily due to higher crime rates in communities of
Clancy 7
color. It is also unfair to attribute the increasing incarceration rates of minority members to
case. Although bigotry and prejudice contribute to who is being arrested and
how they are apprehended, it is not the sole determinant. The incarceration
of young African American and Hispanic men, is not simply a political issue
but a social issue. Not only are these communities impacted because of their
lack of government support, but they also face the most stereotypes, micro-
People who have witnessed mass incarceration from a comfortable distance tend to
Wrzesniewski middle-class entitlement theory. Most people are not aware of problems that they
perceive to have no effect on them, but they fail to realize that the high incarceration rates of any
obviously leads to an increase in taxes, but it also brings to light the failure of the nation. This
nation is only as virtuous as its lowest citizen, so when any member of this country struggles
What are the policies being put into place to prevent mass incarceration?
prisoners (Lobuglio et al.) but this is only a minor progression when tackling a major
controversy. To combat the lack of progress, the government launched the Justice Reinvestment
Clancy 8
Initiative program. But the current model of the JRI is failing, due to the absence of clarity and
structure in its development. So, in the essay Ending Mass Incarceration: Charting a New
Justice Reinvestment, several researchers, analyst, and advocates work to cultivate a more
The authors acknowledge that there are five critical concerns with the current JRI and
those include the Insufficient Targeting of the Key Corrections Reduction Policy
Mechanisms, Limited Involvement of Well Established Local and State Advocacy Groups,
and Failure to Reduce Structural Disincentives (Austin et al.). But within these five
dilemmas, are five solutions. The article dissects the idea that the correctional population is a
function of two factors: admissions (including revocations to prison from probation and parole)
and [the] length of stay (Austin et al.), and suggest that for policy makers to reduce the
incarceration rates, they must decrease these determinants instead of focusing on recidivism
rates, which has been proven to be ineffective (Austin et al.) (see figure 4).
advocacy groups
of organizing and
maintaining ambition for this issue can only be tackled by groups with long term investments
and interest (Austin et al.). The third and fourth dominant concerns involve a deficiency in
Clancy 9
implementation oversight; meaning that there needs to be a system that ensures the quality of the
developed plans (Austin et al.). For example, the JRI proposed that savings from reduced
correctional populations should be poured back into struggling communities; but the current JRI
failed to maintain that proposal (Austin et al.). The final point addresses how the current criminal
justice system has been incentivized by federal grants and the promise of more jobs (Austin et
al.). To solve these issues, the new Justice Reinvestment Initiative needs to refocus their goals,
attack the problem with more aggression, reward decreases in correctional population (without
increasing crime rates), circulate their savings back into the community, and implement a plan of
supervision.
Conclusion
Mass incarceration is a complex and intricate social issue that needs to be handled with
precision. For it to continue, it only needs the silence of this country; but for mass incarceration
to end, it needs a nationwide shift in empathy and compassion. Solutions will not be found in
concerns over the economic aspects of confinement, because it will only prompt America to find
a cheap way out of the situation. Additionally, solutions will not be found in reversing the
political legislation that got America to these rates. Positive results will only be created through
the realization that not only is mass incarceration a critical predicament, but it is devastating the
lives of millions of people. It is important to look at the incarceration rate as more than just a set
of numbers. Each number is an actual person with dreams they wish to achieve, and a family that
worries about them. When America begins to treat prisoners as human beings that have made
mistakes, instead of disposable undesirables, only then will there be an actual change in the
judicial system.
Clancy 10
References
Alexander, Michelle. The New Jim Crow: Mass Incarceration in the Age of Colorblindness.
Austin, James, et al. Ending Mass Incarceration: Charting a New Justice Reinvestment. From
Clancy, Jalynn. Mass Incarceration in the United States of America. Survey. 13 Mar. 2017.
and the Unfinished Project of American Abolition." Philosophy & Social Criticism 42.6 (2015):
<http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0191453715575768>.
Lobuglio, Stefan F. and Anne Morrison Piehl. "Unwinding Mass Incarceration." Issues in
Science & Technology, vol. 32, no. 1, Fall2015, pp. 56-61. EBSCOhost,
search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=iih&AN=110096498&site=ehost-live.
Russell, Thaddeus. "No way out: Talking about racism won't end mass incarceration." Reason,
url=http://link.galegroup.com/apps/doc/A477642147/OVIC?
Tsai, Tyjen, and Paola Scommegna. U.S. Has World's Highest Incarceration Rate. U.S. Has
Wagner, Peter, and Bernadette Rabuy. Mass Incarceration: The Whole Pie 2016. Prison Policy
2017.
Wrzesniewski, Jakub. "The Scariest Explanation for America's Vast Prison Population: We Want
It That Way." America's Prisons, edited by Jack Lasky, Greenhaven Press, 2016.
url=http://link.galegroup.com/apps/doc/EJ3010108435/OVIC?