Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Norhafiz Azis
Mohd Zainal Abidin Abd Kadir
Center for Electromagnetic and Lighting Protection (CELP)
Center for Electromagnetic and Lighting Protection (CELP) Universiti Putra Malaysia
Universiti Putra Malaysia Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia
Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia norhafiz@upm.edu.my
mzk@upm.edu.my
Abstract- Ufer grounding is an effective method for electrical Therefore in previous work, Bentonite was introduced to
earthing, especially at highly resistive soil. The main material improve the grounding characteristics of concrete by
in ufer grounding is concrete which has moisture-dependent prolonging the moisture retention period within the concrete
resistivity. In previous work, mixing concrete with Bentonite
complex [4] . Bentonite itself is a low resistivity material and
was done to observe slight improvement during short term
coupled with its ability to absorb, retain and swell with the
measurements. In current study, the detailed results of
extended period of measurements have been presented. It was
presence of moisture, it was thought that its introduction
found that the improvement of the proposed mix over the would be beneficial to the effectiveness of the concrete mix
standard concrete mix has increased with time. In addition, as a major component of grounding system [5].
mechanical strength of the proposed mix was found to be only
Slight improvement was observed when Bentonite was
10% lower than the standard mix. Therefore this suggests that
the proposed mix may be applicable as the mixture for
introduced into concrete mix at a ratio of 30% base on the
building foundation as in the case of ufer grounding. initial measurements reported in [4]-[5]. However similar
research experimenting on other materials foretold that
Keywords-component; Ufer grounding, Bentonite, Concrete, conclusion on the effectiveness of such grounding
Ground Resistance, Resistivity improvement material can only be accurately drawn after
several years of measurement [6] -[7] .
I. INTRODUCTION
In this paper, detailed analysis on the behavior of the
Grounding system is a compulsory component for all proposed Bentonite mixed concrete for up to two years was
electrical systems. It serves many possible functions which presented. In addition, preliminary results of the mechanical
include power system, transient, signal as well as strength of the proposed mix will also be discussed. The
electrostatic discharge [1]. There are several types of mechanical strength data is crucial in determining its
grounding configurations which cater for specific site suitability as material for building foundation.
conditions. For sites with high soil resistivity, it was
strongly recommended that the steel grounding electrodes be Earthing
embedded in concrete [2]. This method is called ufer rod
B. Site Selection
Before starting the experiment, the site in which the
research will take place was carefully selected. Several
factors were considered in the selection which includes:
573
2014 International Conference on Lightning Protection (ICLP), Shanghai, China
-- -i Megger model DET4TCR2 computes and displays the
,--r----- -----------------
10 em
;; :::; : -
------ , :
apparent soil resistance Re which results from the ratio of
, potential measured between PI and P2 (V) to the measured
,
, 50 em current I. This value of Re was fed into equation above to
::="r:
,
: : :
compute the apparent soil resistivity. The operating
,
,, frequency ofDET4TCR2 was fixed at 128 Hz which is not
mm_ _ - -
I';-:I
Concrete mix a at a harmonic of power frequencies [11] .
:
Metal_
! 25 em 5 em -+ i+ Fig. 5 shows the mapping for soil resIstIvIty
eage
! measurement purpose. The mapping was done according to
: --------------
l ______ !_!':'____________________________________
_
procedures employed and recommended in [8] , [11] -[12].
Figure 3. Dimension of each pit [4] Three sides of the site which forms a right-angled triangle
shape were identified as the measurement intervals. At each
side, several measurements were done at several probe
D. Mapping of Soil Resistivity spacings (r). Although the most accurate of soil resistivity
mapping is by considering measurement at mesh-shaped
The most recommended method in measuring the soil
sides of dimensions as small as possible, the right-angled
resistivity of large soil masses is 4-point method [8] . There
triangle mapping was deemed sufficient as only the rough
are two variations of such method namely Wenner
estimation of soil resistivity is necessary for this stage of
Arrangement and Schlumberger-Palmer Arrangement. In research. Mesh-shaped side measurement is required when
terms of worldwide practice, Wenner method is more
mapping soil resistivity for designing grounding system for
favored [9] . Wenner method is more efficient when
power substations.
comparison is drawn with regard to the ratio of received
voltage per unit of transmitted current. However in terms of
time and manpower, Schlumberger method is better as it
requires that only the outer probes be moved for 4-5 times
for each movement of the inner probes whereas in Wenner
arrangement, all probes have to be moved for each
measurement. Nonetheless, Wenner method was chosen for
this research work because it was the most preferred one in Figure 4. Wenner arrangement
the literature. Another reason of adopting Wenner method is
that the designs are buried at 1 m depth, and considering the
fact that only the resistivity of soil up to I m depth is
relevant, Wenner method is more justified as Schlumberger
method is more accurate for larger inter-probe spacing and
hence corresponding to resistivity of soil at greater depth.
The main principle behind the Wenner method is the
average soil resistivity (P) up to certain depth of soil which
is equal to the separation distance between the probes (r)
Si de 3
can be approximated to be equal to 2Re7fr if the depth of
ide I
G (50..5m)
P2) and two outer current probes (C l and C2) which are
Figure 5. Soil resistivity mapping
spaced equally by r m in a straight line and driven vertically
into the soil up to a depth d m. The Digital Earth Tester
574
2014 International Conference on Lightning Protection (ICLP), Shanghai, China
Eight cylindrical PVC pipes with open ends measuring Figure 7. Concrete sample under test
10 cm in height and 10 cm in diameter were used as moulds
for the concrete mix. Note that, the mix was exactly the The test was conducted according to ASTM C 469 C39
same as those used in grounding pits. The Bentonite test method for uniaxial compressive strength test of
concrete mixes were poured into the cylindrical moulds and concrete [15] . Increasing vertical force was applied on the
left for hardening for 24 hours. While pouring the concrete specimen until the breakdown of the samples occurred
mixes into the moulds, the mix was constantly hammered which was indicated by a drop in the force applied. The
and stirred to maximize compaction. Otherwise, voids and system will automatically stop increasing the vertical force
pores would be formed within the mix. After that, they were once it detected that the specimen has undergone complete
de-moulded and left for natural curing in air for 28 days. physical breakdown. Fig. 8 shows the final state of a
Fig. 6 shows the Bentonite mixed concrete blocks with the completely destroyed concrete sample.
same composition as the mixtures in the grounding pits.
575
2014 International Conference on Lightning Protection (ICLP), Shanghai, China
576
2014 International Conference on Lightning Protection (ICLP), Shanghai, China
2.5%. Drastic reduction of strength occurred when TABLE 1. SOIL RESISTIVITY PROFILE
Therefore when considering both the electrical and Probe Soil Soil
mechanical aspects, it is clear that 30% Bentonite-concrete Measurement Spacing Resistance Resistivity
mix is the optimum mix which addresses the objective of Sides (m) (0) (Om)
this thesis most. Since the mechanical strength of the 30% 2 8.67 109
composition was comparable with that of standard concrete, 4 4.15 104
its application as ufer ground in which the building's
6 2.92 110
foundation is utilized is feasible.
8 2.33 117
1
Rainfall (mml
10 l.93 121
12 1.49 112
611.8 14 l.30 114
16 1.02 103
375.8
.B9.4 0.5 60.2 189
279.7
257.9
1 27.63 174
180.5
2
1.5 17. 77 168
2 8. 88 112
2 9.45 119
Figure 9. Monthly rainfall data for year 2012 4 4.09 103
6 2. 77 104
.Rainfall (mml 8 2.58 130
3
314.5 10 2.00 126
302
12 l.32 100
14 1. 11 98
16 0.99 100
.,.....
January February March April May June July August 6
'2
/ '\
I \
Figure 10. Monthly rainfall data for year 2013
4
5
/ \
"
/ \
. 23 I \
'"
1 / '"
U
/ .......
-1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 1
CompreSSIve Stram (%)
577
2014 International Conference on Lightning Protection (ICLP), Shanghai, China
578
2014 International Conference on Lightning Protection (ICLP), Shanghai, China
V. CONCLUSION
TABLE 3. GROUND RESISTANCE MEASUREMENTS FROM It can be concluded that 30% Bentonite-concrete
SEPTEMBER TO DECEMBER 2012 (WET PERIOD)
composition is the optimwn mixing composition due to its
Average Ground Standard Deviation
lowest ground resistance and fluctuation. Improvement in
Pit Resistance (0) (0) tenns of electrical grounding characteristic was achieved by
1 18.29 2.29 mixing Bentonite with concrete at a ratio of 30%. Base on the
2 2l.34 2.38 mechanical strength test on air cured bentonite-concrete mixes,
3 36.44 2.75 introduction of 30% Bentonite to concrete building foundation
4 15.11 1.54 should have minimal reduction effect to its mechanical
strength since the mechanical strength of the best mix was
5 18.07 2.64
comparable with that of standard concrete. However more
6 17.35 2.69
extensive study should be done on the mechanical strength
7 18.95 4. l9 characterization by considering more aspects such as effect of
8 18.41 3.01 moist curing, admixtures as well as type of water used in
mixing.
Average Ground Standard Deviation The authors would like to thank UPM for the support.
Pit Resistance (0) (0)
REFERENCES
1 34.43 7.33
2 39.09 8. 13
3 64. 72 16.62 [1] S. C. Lim, C. Gomes, and M. Z. A. Ab. Kadir,
"Electrical earthing in troubled environment, " Int. J
4 31. 18 7.56
Electr. Power Energy Syst. , vol. 47, no. May, pp. 117-
5 33. 81 7.90 128, 2013.
6 40.93 10.41 [2] "IEEE Standard 142-2007 Recommended Practice for
Grounding of Industrial and Commercial Power
7 45. 74 14.20 Systems."
8 48.94 13.59 [3] L. Sandrolini, U. Reggiani, and a Ogunsola,
"Modelling the electrical properties of concrete for
shielding effectiveness prediction," J Phys. D. Appl.
Phys. , vol. 40, no. 17, pp. 5366-5372, Sep. 2007.
[4] S. C. Lim, C. Gomes, and M. Z. A. Ab. Kadir,
TABLE 5. OVERALL READINGS FOR THE ENTIRE FIRST YEAR (2012) "Preliminary Results of the Performance of Grounding
Electrodes Encased in Bentonite-Mixed Concrete, " in
Average Ground Standard Deviation International Conference on Lightning Protection,
Pit Resistance (0) (0) 2012.
[5] S. C. Lim, C. Gomes, and M. Z. A. Ab. Kadir,
1 22.46 9.73
"Characterizing of bentonite with chemical, physical
2 25. 18 8.96 and electrical perspectives for improvement of
3 40.36 23.85 electrical grounding systems," Int. J Electrochem.
Sci. , no. September, 2013.
4 2l. l2 7.00
[6] C. Gomes, C. Lalitha, and C. Priyadrarshanee, "Earth
5 24.31 6.97 Resistance Reducing Materials; Applications of
6 25.49 10.06 Industrial Wastes and Natural Substances, " presented
at the 30th International Conference on Lightning
7 27.51 12.09
Protection, ICLP 2010, Cagliari, Sardini, Italy, 2010.
8 30.11 13.54 [7] G. Eduful, J. E. Cole, and F. . Tetteh, "Palm Kernel
Oil Cake as an alternative to earth resistance-reducing
agent," International Journal of Applied Engineering
Research, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. J] 5-121, 2009.
579
2014 International Conference on Lightning Protection (ICLP), Shanghai, China
[8] "IEEE 81 Guide for Measuring Earth Resistivity, Mixed Concrete Encased Steel Cage under High Soil
Ground Impedance, and Earth Surface Potentials of a Resistivity Condition, " in Asia-Pacific international
Ground System. " Conference on Lightning, 2013, pp. 3-8.
[9] "IEEE Standard 80-2000, IEEE Guide for Safety in [14] S. C. Lim, L. W. Choun, C. Gomes, and M. Z. A. A.
AC Substation Grounding, " Kadir, "Environmental effects on the performance of
[10] S. P. Friedman, "Soil properties influencing apparent electrical grounding systems, " in Power Engineering
electrical conductivity: a review, " Computers and and Optimization Conference (PEOCO), 2013 IEEE
Electronics in Agriculture, vol. 46, no. 1-3, pp. 45-70, 7th International, 2013, no. June, pp. 330-333.
Mar. 2005. [15] "Test Method for Compressive Strength of Cylindrical
[11] G. E. Resistance, F. Affecting, and S. Resistivity, Concrete Specimens, " West Conshohocken, Pa, 2003.
"Understanding Soil Resistivity Testing Effects of Soil [16] K. M. Nemati, "Strength of Concrete, "
Resistivity on Understanding Soil Resistivity Testing, " courses. washington. edulcm4 25/strength. pdf?
no. October, 2011. (accessed: 02 Sep 2013).
[12] F. Wenner, ""A Method of Measuring Earth [17] K. Kishore, "What is concrete strength and what are
Resistivity, " Report No. 258, Bulletin of the Bureau of the factors affecting it ?"
Standards, Volume 12, No. 3, October 11, 1915. http://www.engineeringciviI.com/what-is-concrete
[13] S. C. Lim, C. Gomes, M. Zainal, and A. Ab, strength-and-what-are-the-factors-affecting-it.htrnl.
"Preliminary Grounding Performance of Bentonite (accessed: 3 Feb 2013).
580